Horizon Zero Dawn time-lapse: World in motion.

One of the best looking open world games for sure. The only open world game that I think touches this is Witcher 3 on PC.

He's a clown. Don't waste your time with him.

So, you're saying that Naughty Duds lie when they said Sony ordered them to copy Gears and DF over Ryse?

Besides Naughty Duds did nothing but for their entire existence of 30+ years try to copy the successful franchises. When platformers were all the rag they were trying to copy Nintendo and Mario and when drak gritty shooters become popular they again copied it with Uncharted. And since Naughty Duds have found the casual success with UC2 they are churning the same onrails garbage left and right.

I also criticized and trash Ryse but that doesn't change the fact that it was still superior than Crapzone: Shadow Fail while being on a 50% weaker console.

So, are you going to proof me wrong, quackknight? Oh wait, you can't because you were caught with your panties down trying to downplay PC games.

Remain butthurt that Sony's biggest franchise is the direct result of a copy of Gears which cows hate so much and Ryse still crapped on their precious exclusives while being on a 50% weaker hardware. So, much for elite First Party.

But wait, there's something even more pathetic, the so called elite devs couldn't get the last gen TLOU to run at constant 60FPS on 900pStation or even on Pro, LMAO.

No need to prove you wrong, you're an idiot, you were already wrong the moment you started typing. Quicksilver has already destroyed you in here. You're just blabbering like a buffoon to save your ego, you've been owned on all fronts. Gears is a shitty 7/10 flop of a game, Crytek hasn't made anything good since Crysis Warhead, and it's why they are running out of business. Their engine is trash and it's why everyone is dumping them. UE4 and Frostbite shit all over them.

@zeeshanhaider: Im saying its a far superior franchise and has set more standards then Gears ever dreamed of. Look at the new Tomb Raider? Its almost completely inspired by Uncharted. Again reviews and sales back that up and there is no way you can objectively argue that.

And did Ryse look better then PS4 launch titles? Maybe but it also ran far worse and ran at lower resolution. The funny thing us now is Both Horizon and UC4 shitstomp Ryse from a technical standpoint and also managed to be better games.

Uncharted has become the series it is today thanks to Sony feeling pressure from the success of Xbox with its ‘gritty shooters’, an ex-Naughty Dog developer has revealed.

Talking exclusively to Play, Don Poole, former Environment Modeller at Naughty Dog, explains how Uncharted: Drake’s Fortune was originally a ‘fantasy’ game until orders came from Sony to make it more ‘realistic’.

Uncharted has become the series it is today thanks to Sony feeling pressure from the success of Xbox with its ‘gritty shooters’, an ex-Naughty Dog developer has revealed.

Talking exclusively to Play, Don Poole, former Environment Modeller at Naughty Dog, explains how Uncharted: Drake’s Fortune was originally a ‘fantasy’ game until orders came from Sony to make it more ‘realistic’.

http://www.nowgamer.com/naughty-dog-gritty-xbox-shooters-shaped-uncharted/

All of which begs the question: could these new consoles run Crysis 3? Ryse delivers the full suite of CryEngine features with excellent image quality and it's still just a launch title. Given the experience of working on such a product, we have little doubt that Crytek could produce a Crysis Trilogy of sorts for next-generation consoles with few compromises

Source

Remain butthurt that Sony's biggest franchise is the direct result of a copy of Gears which cows hate so much and Ryse still crapped on their precious exclusives while being on a 50% weaker hardware. So, much for elite First Party.

@zeeshanhaider: You're not even trying to make sense now. Using shitty rumors from disgruntled former employees as facts now. LOL at the idea that Uncharted was inspired by Gears of Fail. Let's pretend Killswitch didn't exist before Gears...

Face it, Gears is a mediocre 6/10 and 7/10 franchise now with abysmal sales to boot. Even Epic the original creators don't want to have anything to do with it now. How does it make you feel knowing Gears will never have the sales or critical acclaim that Uncharted has gained over the years? Must be gut-wrenching for you.

Gears is such a shitty franchise. Halo was great under Bungie. Gears was never good.

@zeeshanhaider: Ryse would barely crack the top 10 compared to other PS4 games. Sonys first part keeps getting better and better while Crytek peeked in 2012.

Meanwhile that so called gritty copy ( which has a teen rating ) blew gears out of the water. Classic Sony, constantly evolving and improving while Crytek got left in the dust on its way to bankruptcy. Get Rekt !

Is this your DC?

Bu...bu.....bu....disgruntled employee.

Funny thing is I always maintained that Gears was a shitty franchise and one of the worst. Doesn't change the fact that Naughty Duds were ordered to copy it by Sony.

Remain butthurt that Sony's biggest franchise is the direct result of a copy of Gears which cows hate so much and Ryse still crapped on their precious exclusives while being on a 50% weaker hardware. So, much for elite First Party.

@Heil68 said:

@xhawk27

Love you deleted your comment. ..lol

But do tell us here at GS forums what excluive game is releasing at END of 2017 with Scorpio?????

I'm going to mall tomorrow, l'll pre-order that sum'bitch.

Forza 7.

ANd Tomb Raider is now worse for it. Still doesn't change the fact that Naughty Duds never did anything original in their 30+ years. Let alone an original title, they don't even have a single original mechanic to their credit. LOL Naughty Duds. Always copying.

And did Ryse look better then PS4 launch titles? Maybe but it also ran far worse and ran at lower resolution. The funny thing us now is Both Horizon and UC4 shitstomp Ryse from a technical standpoint and also managed to be better games.

Oh congratulations to Naughty Duds and Garbage Games. They finally surpassed Ryse after 3-4 years on a 50% - 250% more powerful hardware. Hurray! Must be a proud moment for them that they finally caught up with Crysis 2 6 years late. Everytime they go head to head, Crytek blown them out of the galaxy.

LOL Crytek peeked in 2012 that' why their technology is still powering the most ambitious game to date and not to mention have been used for full length feature films like Dawn of the Planet of the Apes. Funny, how Sony has a films division yet they are nowhere near the level of Crytek's technical abilities. Ouch!

And LOL Crytek even at the verge of bankruptcy is the owner of more expensive tech than Naughty Duds or Garbage Games were ever worth in their entire lifetime. LMAO! Evolving a non-game? Good joke. You know what evolving and improving means, it's like when Epic left Gears to work on UT, Fortnight etc. What's Naughty Duds doing making another non-game?

@zeeshanhaider said:

ANd Tomb Raider is now worse for it.

Still doesn't change the fact that Naughty Duds never did anything original in their 30+ years.

Let alone an original title, they don't even have a single original mechanic to their credit. LOL Naughty Duds. Always copying.

NO is not worse...The highest rated Tomb Raider game is the first one on PS1 with 91%,after that one non have 90 or even 88%.

The series went down way before it took from Uncharted dude.

TR 2 has 85% TR3 has 76% and there are some chapters even lower into mediocrity,the last tomb raider on last gen console which is also on PS4,xbox one and PC had 86% and on PS3 87,Rise of the Tomb Raider which is more like Uncharted has 86 and 88 on PS4,so again factually you are WRONG.

Yeah what is so original about Crysis PS hater? Oh nothing and you suck Crytek ass for years and their games aren't Uncharted caliber period..

The lowest on the main chapters is 88...

Haahahahaa Uncharted on its worse chapter almost match Crysis on its best,and Uncharted on its best own Crysis...hahahaa

lol

Hahahahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa...

We get it you hate Sony and everything their developers do,you downplay Guerrilla in the same way to...hahahaa

Problem is ND is not Guerrilla...

Those guys piss all over your beloved Crytek and Piss over Tomb Raider and Cristal Dynamics as well..hahahahaha

No. Tomb Raider before was a game. Now it isn't though still better than onrails DowngradeCharted 4. Secondly, Naughty Duds are not game developers, let alone good game developers. They make non-games in their own words. LMAO. Naughty Duds in their 30+ years of copying never did a single original title or even a single mechanic. Nothing can change that. And when the industry legend like Warren Specter called them on their bullshit they couldn't defend their pathetic non-game. The even embarrassing thing, their most successful franchise is the copy of Gears in their own words. Deal with it. lol Naughty Duds.

And the even funny thing they are even worse as a technical devs. Have nothing to show for themselves apart from downgrades and copying techniques pioneered by Crytek and other PC devs. LMAO.

And I won't even going to list what's so original and unique about Far Cry and Crysis when entire industry knows that and applaud Crytek for their genre defining games. You cows downplaying it just goes to show your insecurity because the Sony First Party in comparison is truly pathetic. Remain butthurt that Crytek busted the myth of teh powah of teh cell. No wonder Naughty Duds never bragged about it after words once Tiago Sousa called them out on their lie.

That's nice, but we both have our opinions.

I would only use an example that I've played. But yeah, holy shit.

@zeeshanhaider: Again you are Factually incorrect. TR is better then it ever has been. It had moved into complete irrelevance untill they took a page from Naughty dog. Again its objectively worse then UC but still better then just about anything Cryteks produced.

You blast ND and GG technical abilty but the fact remains they both have more impressive games then anything Crytek has ever produced. Why is that? Because like their games their engine also became irrelevant. Thats why that most ambitious game still isnt done and why they moved away from cryengine to lumberyard. Its why they are on the verge of bankruptcy. Because both their games and their engine sucks. Epic couldn't make decent games anymore but at least their engine is solid.

ND recently won a Annie award in outstanding animation. A technology they pioneerd which is constantly better then any other game in the Industry. What Crytek produce? Another flop lmao?! Hopefully Sony can hire some of their more talented devs if any are left.

@zeeshanhaider:

You're getting tossed around and owned in this thread so hard. You're not even trying to fight back with any facts. You claim Crytek is relevant when they are on the verge of bankruptcy and their engine has been abandoned by practically every dev in the industry including Star Citizen devs. Ryse was a monumental flop and even Robinson their VR game flopped harder than pancakes. TR franchise was on a death spiral before they decided to start copying the Uncharted formula and now they are relevant again. You've been completely destroyed in this thread by facts. You're a complete clown. Any regular poster would have abandoned this thread after getting owned so hard but since you have no shame at all in life you're here continuing to further embarrass yourself.

LOL Lumberyard is still Crytek's technology. Amazon even lists as based on Cryengine 3. LMFAo, and yes, TR is worse than when it was a GAME.

Naughty Duds don't make games. LOL all their lives Naughty Duds and garbage Games have made copies, not a single original thing. Remain butthurt. Crytek has 3 genre defining games and nothing that you say will change the fact even though Crytek were far younger studio than Naughty Duds.

LOL, animation is an artistic tlent, what the **** technology has to do with it? The technology behind is the same as Crytek pioneered. LMAO. LOL Naughty Duds best talent is still making use of the tech pioneered by Crytek and other PC devs. Such a shame that a studio that's around for 30+ years have made zero contributions to technology and have absolutely zero originality. Oh and Crytek is still worth more than Garbage Games and Naughty Duds not to mention all this blahblah about animation and Crytek is the only devs whose realtime tech has been deemed good enough for hollywood production. Sony First Party isn't even in the same galaxy.

And still Crytek is for more technically capable than all of Sony First party combine. Burn!!!

Remain butthurt that Sony's biggest franchise is the direct result of a copy of Gears which cows hate so much and Ryse still crapped on their precious exclusives while being on a 50% weaker hardware. So, much for elite First Party.

The draw distance is actually quite impressive for a console release, and the graphics are well beyond Skyrim (Yes, even modded skyrim). Having ridiculously detailed textures and high poly models imported into the game via mods in Skyrim will only get you so far. Skyrim is seriously lacking when it comes to lighting, effects and world detail. The lighting in Bethesda games is atrocious, and lighting is one of the key elements in creating convincing looking games.

I'm so pumped up for Horizon been waiting a very long time to get my hands on this game but right now I'm in the middle of playing RE7 so i'll have to find time to play Horizon.

@quadknight: Saying Cloud Imperium abandoned Cryengine isn't quite accurate.

@zeeshanhaider: You just ramble like a incoherent madman. Continue to defend the dead and worthless developer. And no i assure you they are worth far less then any of Sonys major first party studios. They were decent at tech and terrible at games. And with all the talent that has left their not good at either now.

@zeeshanhaider: do you feel better now?

First proof they are dead? And even if they are dead, it's hilarious that they worth more than premier Sony First Party Studios in their dead state and have created new technologies and genre defining games. None can be said about any of the Sony First Party studio. They contributed shit to technology and have zero originality while still copying tech pioneered by the 'dead' developer. Crytek were always best at tech, probably still is since they are the only devs in the industry with a working and operations SVOGI solution in place, and they were one of the greatest when they were PC only. Consoles be damned for ruining another great dev.

Always feel good after owning Sony drones and their shitty devs.

@zeeshanhaider: This is to easy. I almost feel bad like im picking on a kid with special needs. You need proof Crytek is dead? They haven't paid their employees in months. They had to sell the rights to one of their games because they didn't have the budget to finish it. They haven't made a game thats scored at least a 8 on metacritic in almost a decade and to top it off they can't even get anyone to license their engine anymore.

The Decima engine has a brighter future then anything Crytek has out there and from a game perspective there would be at least 5 studios from Sonys first party that obliterate them.

All of Cryengines impressive innovations were due to the fact they had the limitless power of the PC while console developers were hamstrung to 10 year old hardware (PS3). All it took was a new console with better specs and Crytek got left in the dust. Look at their VR effort(Robinson the Journey). Now explain to me why RE7 on the same platform utterly destroys it? Lmao they can't even hold Capcoms jock anymore much less any of Sonys first party.

Old news. They have now paid their employees. Again old news, they have sold the IP and the shitty studio that created Haze. The flop for Sony. LMAO. Again it said about their financial power when they were developing for PC that they were able to buy 5-6 studios around the world compared to when they went the route of consoles. And after all that they are still worth more than premier Sony First Party studios. It's so fucking ridiculous that Crytek after all that are still independent while the studios you are comparing with have gone bankrupt eons ago, that's why Sony was able to buy them for peanuts. Oh yeah, they can't license their engine, that's why Amazon has Lumberyard and the most ambitious game to date is being build on their technology, not to mention PREY is coming out. The latest game to based on their engine. Not to mention their are countless others in the pipeline. Idiots like you think just because it isn't popular like Unity, it's not cutting edge.

The Decima engine has a brighter future then anything Crytek has out there and from a game perspective there would be at least 5 studios from Sonys first party that obliterate them.

LOL, what future? Is Death Stranding a more ambitious game than Star Citizen? LOL Kojima is so out of knowledge from the latest tech that he had to travel the world to learn the latest tech of games and is still helped by western studios. LMAO. Great comparison. And yes, Crytek is still worth more than Sony's premier studios. What does Sony's premier studios had at their name? Zing....they have nothing. The IPs are owned by Sony, and at the tech side they always copying the revolutionary PC devs like Epic, Id, Crytek etc. Really hurt you that after all these debate you were never able to name a single contribution from them to the tech side. Neither did the elite first party have created anything original. Remain butthurt that after all that Crytek has 3 genre defining games to their credit.

All of Cryengines impressive innovations were due to the fact they had the limitless power of the PC while console developers were hamstrung to 10 year old hardware (PS3). All it took was a new console with better specs and Crytek got left in the dust. Look at their VR effort(Robinson the Journey). Now explain to me why RE7 on the same platform utterly destroys it? Lmao they can't even hold Capcoms jock anymore much less any of Sonys first party.

LOL, is that why Ryse shat on the elite Sony First Party while being on a 50% weaker hardware? And at the time of Crysis PS3 wasn't 10 years old. And Crysis 2 even on consoles shit on Sony's offerings. Still hilarious whenever I read the Naughty Duds interview and they were bragging about finally being able to implement SSAO ( A crytek invented technique) in their non-game. Another hilarious situation when Tiago Sousa ripped them on their bullshit powah of teh cell excuse with UC3. And LOL, Robinson still looks better than RE7 VR. Stop comparing it to the PC videos. Must suck that after 6 years Sony First Party is barely starting to catch up with Crysis 2.

@zeeshanhaider: More fail on your part. Naughty dog was no where near bankruptcy when Sony bought them. Neither was sucker punch and SSM was created by Sony. Id hate to break it to you but Crytek didnt come up with most of the techniques dip shit. Just because their engine uses it doesn't mean they created it.

Again comparing games on the same platform Robinson the journey looks like shit compared to RE7. How is that even a argument? And in 2017 Crytek is behind both GG, ND and SSM. Ryse looks worse then all of their best efforts. And Crysis 2 on the PS3? LMAO! It was 680p and had dips into the teens. Lol Cryrekt!

Also i want a link that shows the value of Crytek and it being worth more then all of Sony first party or else im just going to assume you're lying.

@Quicksilver128: Crytek actually did pioneer a lot of techniques though. But they still suck these days lol.

LOL Naughty Duds sold to Sony and even the original founders left when they were pissed with Sony's directing them to always copy this and that. LOL they aren't independent, so the very favt that a bigger fish ate them shows that they were trash and needed saving. Crytek are still independent and without the endless dollars from a big publisher they still created many techniues and have 3 genre defining games to their credit, unlike the entire Sony First Party.

Yes, Crytek did pioneer and created many techniques. From the top of my brain: SSAO, SSDO, IBL, RealTime Local Reflections, volumetric coulds, fogs, particles that cast and receive shadows and as well as effected by physics. Vegetations that weren't static and reacts to players and effected by physics. Hell they were the first to do realtime GI and again improved it this generation with SVOGI. Hell realtime SBS was pioneered by Crytek. Remain butthurt. While Sony First Party still uses baked shadows and lighting to date, LMAO.

LOL. RE7 looks like shit even at max on my PC. I can wager it looks like gutter trash on PSVR with its PS2 graphics, and I have already seen back to the dinosaur Island as well the Climb to knows how Crytek games look in VR. So tell your lies to someone else. Besides rather than believing you I believe DF who agrees that Ryse shat on Sony's best offerings while being on a 50% weaker hardware as well as Crysis 2 with its all realtime lighting system unlike DowngradeCharted4 that still uses baked lighting and shadows. BURN! Tiago Sousa ripped Sony First Party and particularly Naughty Duds over UC3 over teh powah of teh cell so you lose again at the subHD part.

It's pretty easy to tell Crytek is the owner of Crysis, Ryse, Warface, Cryengine, FimEngine, HUNT, TimeSplitters and bunch of other F2P IPs. And their Cryengine license to Amazon is estimated to be in excess of $65M+. What does any of the Sony First Party studio owns.....their personal twitter accounts? LMAO. Go home you have been owned and remain buttmad that Sony first Party neither contributed a thing in terms of technology nor they have made any contributions to the games creatively. One word defines Sony's offerings - COPY.

@zeeshanhaider: Why does nothing Crytek produced look better then UC4 or Horizon? Why can't they top themselves from 2011?

Why can't they make a game, that scores above a 7? Why does Robinson the Journey look like shit compared to RE7? Why did Crysis 2 run at 600p at 15fps on PS3?

And if Crytek made 65 million why are they on the verge of bankruptcy?

Stop crying your hero has fallen! Good day loser. Try to defend someone who is relevant.

An argument between I Can Haz and peeshanheider for whose pot can call the kettle black more often is amazing. Keep it up you two.

Stopped reading at DowngradeCharted4 looking better. Sorry I believe DF over any random Sony drone that's hyping onrails grabge with baked shadows.

Already exposed all your lies. Remainn butthurt that Sony First Party neither contributed anything to the games industry whether you look at technically or creatively. Crytek did both while being a much younger studio.

Oh and I just remember at least Crytek never made a subHD game on a current gen system. Garbage Game has a subHD Crapzone: Shadow Fail to their resume. Try to defend some competent dev. HINT: They are not part of Sony First Party. :D

Flagged! And f**k lingua franca.

@zeeshanhaider: If you believe Df then you believe UC4 is the most impressive game on consoles.

And never released a sub hd game? Crysis 2 was sub HD on PS3. Ryse was sub HD on XB1. Thats actually all they do. They can't even meet the industry standard.

I love how you run into a thread about Horizon. It just shows how salty you are.

@Blabadon: lol, im not Icanhaz.

Not sure Xflop could even run this engine without a significant downgrade. It's a great time to game on PS4.

Industry leading visuals with review scores to match. Xbox Done.

Yay, congratulations on finally reaching a bar set by Crysis 2. Sony First Party is only 6 years late. SHame shame!

Crytek never released a subHD game on current gen of consoles unlike Garbage Games which lied about Crapzone: Shadow Fail running at 1080p/60 while DF caught that it's actually subHD. LOL Ryse was 1600x900. It's HD resolution. Remain butthurt.

Let me rub some more salt on your wounds, both Robinson and RIGS went head to head, you know which studio got canned? Yup, the answer is guerilla Cambridge. So much for Crytek going bankrupt. I would hate to think what would Crytek do if they were to release a new AAA production title since Sony First Party is stuck copying their tech from 2011 and still failing at it. It will be a massacre.

In the end, if you have anything to prove that your shitty Sony First Party has over Crytek then reply otherwise I don't have time to read your ramblings without any facts. So far you have failed to list any contributions from Sony to the gaming world.

@zeeshanhaider: Oh 900p is HD now? Lmao! Ironic because KZ: SF ran at a full 1080p in the singleplayer. It only dropped below that in MP which it was running double the framerate. Which not even DF could tell at first because the IQ was very clean. Just another impressive scaling method created by GG.

Wtf is rigs? Not to mention Crytek has already had several side studios shutdown so dont even go there because you lose again.

And taking the throne from Crysis 2? Lol Crysis 2 never had it with its sub 720p and 15fps. Meanwhile ND and GG have the most impressive games to date. Try donating to Cryrekt though maybe they will polish another turd for you and release it for pc!

It couldn't. Its simply too much for the X1 to handle. Maybe under a dynamic res dropping down to 540p, tho.

Oh, you think 900p is subHD? No wonder you didn't know anything about graphics and another brain dead Sony drone. I feel embarrassed now that I was talking to you. Here's the hint Garbage Games are the ones that have a subHD game to their credit this gen. Go and educate yourself. And LOL at giving Garbage Games the credit for temporal reconstruction. So, all those stereoscopic games didn't exist before Crapzone: Shadow Fail?

And as always remain butthurt over he fact that Sony First Party have zero contributions to the games industry and even in 2017 they are trying to catch up a bar set by Crysis 2 in 2011.

All of which begs the question: could these new consoles run Crysis 3? Ryse delivers the full suite of CryEngine features with excellent image quality and it's still just a launch title. Given the experience of working on such a product, we have little doubt that Crytek could produce a Crysis Trilogy of sorts for next-generation consoles with few compromises - and yes, we want it. Given the quality of the developer's work on Xbox One, we would love to see what it could do with PlayStation 4 in the future as well. However, despite all the technological finery on offer, the limited and repetitive gameplay make Ryse difficult to actually recommend as a prospective purchase. That said, if you really want a taste of what we can expect from the next generation of consoles, Ryse towers over the rest.

Source

BURN! Only 6 years late!

@zeeshanhaider: 900p is lower then 1080p you rambling buffoon. So again another win for GG. And why you post an old article from before UC4 and Horizon was released im not sure how that has any relevance.

Keep owning yourself though this is entertaining.

And why do you keep mentioning Crysis 2? It wouldn't crack the top 20 on the PS4 , maybe not even top 50.

LOL Garbage Games, they suck so much that they created a subHD game on a current generation console and that too on a 50% more powerful hardware. And to top all that they were lying as well. Shame shame!

And in the meantime learn a thing or two about graphics otherwise I won't entertain your next post.

All of which begs the question: could these new consoles run Crysis 3? Ryse delivers the full suite of CryEngine features with excellent image quality and it's still just a launch title. Given the experience of working on such a product, we have little doubt that Crytek could produce a Crysis Trilogy of sorts for next-generation consoles with few compromises - and yes, we want it. Given the quality of the developer's work on Xbox One, we would love to see what it could do with PlayStation 4 in the future as well. However, despite all the technological finery on offer, the limited and repetitive gameplay make Ryse difficult to actually recommend as a prospective purchase. That said, if you really want a taste of what we can expect from the next generation of consoles, Ryse towers over the rest.

Source

BURN! Only 6 years late at the best and at worst even Ryse crapped all over Sony First Party while being on a 50% weaker hardware.

Horizon looks like a really nice game to dive into. Coolyfett may have to dive into this one!!!

2160p checkboard is not true 4k resolution.

It's running at a lower resolution then scaled to fit 4k.

That seems like it could be dangerous. There must be a medication or therapy that can help with that. You should check with your OB/GYN.

Some advise you can use....

You can thank me later. :P

every game looks good to me since 2000..and some even before then..i simply dont get excited over any game ive seen..NONE...maybe im alone here??

@zeeshanhaider: So you have been Rekt and have resorted to posting the same irrelevant 5 year old article?

DF already stated games looked better so please explain the relevance. Also why do you ignore KZ:SF was 1080p vs Ryse 900p?

lol I have been rekt by a fool who don't know the difference among HD, subHD and FullHD!

Crapzone: Shadow Fail was subHD on a 50% more powerful hardware. Remain butthurt and who am I to judge when DF shat all over Sony First Party while also exposing 900pStation. For a Sony drone who doesn't know jack about graphics I have only this to say:

All of which begs the question: could these new consoles run Crysis 3? Ryse delivers the full suite of CryEngine features with excellent image quality and it's still just a launch title. Given the experience of working on such a product, we have little doubt that Crytek could produce a Crysis Trilogy of sorts for next-generation consoles with few compromises - and yes, we want it. Given the quality of the developer's work on Xbox One, we would love to see what it could do with PlayStation 4 in the future as well. However, despite all the technological finery on offer, the limited and repetitive gameplay make Ryse difficult to actually recommend as a prospective purchase. That said, if you really want a taste of what we can expect from the next generation of consoles, Ryse towers over the rest.

Source

@zeeshanhaider: You have been rekt because you praised Crycraps ability on consoles. You bash GG yet the fact there game ran at 1080p in the single player vs the lower 900p in Ryse. How can I take a moron who seriously ignores this simple fact? The sub HD your referring to ran at 60fps vs Ryse that had dips into the low 20s? If you don't known the correlation between frame rate and resolution and can't objectively acknowledge that then your not worthy to speak too.