@zeeshanhaider: You have been rekt because you praised Crycraps ability on consoles. You bash GG yet the fact there game ran at 1080p in the single player vs the lower 900p in Ryse. How can I take a moron who seriously ignores this simple fact? The sub HD your referring to ran at 60fps vs Ryse that had dips into the low 20s? If you don't known the correlation between frame rate and resolution and can't objectively acknowledge that then your not worthy to speak too.
Like I said I won't entertain a Sony drone who doesn't know jack about graphics and especially the one who hypes a subHD turd with baked lighting and shadows. Remain butthurt that Crytek shat on Sony First Party while working on a 50% weaker hardware. Ouch! Sorry Sony drone, you a nobody because:
All of which begs the question: could these new consoles run Crysis 3? Ryse delivers the full suite of CryEngine features with excellent image quality and it's still just a launch title. Given the experience of working on such a product, we have little doubt that Crytek could produce a Crysis Trilogy of sorts for next-generation consoles with few compromises - and yes, we want it. Given the quality of the developer's work on Xbox One, we would love to see what it could do with PlayStation 4 in the future as well. However, despite all the technological finery on offer, the limited and repetitive gameplay make Ryse difficult to actually recommend as a prospective purchase. That said, if you really want a taste of what we can expect from the next generation of consoles,Ryse towers over the rest.
Source
![](https://www.gamespot.com/a/uploads/original/105/1053478/3081291-1137545177-30575.gif)
Log in to comment