How are PC's a generation ahead exactly?

  • 187 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for SoraX64
SoraX64

29221

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#51 SoraX64
Member since 2008 • 29221 Posts

The only advantage PCs have over consoles is graphics and even that isn't a generation ahead, it's not the leap from PS2 to PS3 at the moment, hermits are too ecstatic over it. What about gameplay, sound, animations? I have yet to see a PC game match a game like Killzone 3 or Uncharted 2 in sound/animation.

Let's not get ahead of ourselves here.

Blazerdt47
Game play? So now game play dictates a new generation? And you obviously don't look at many PC games if you think the graphics aren't a generation ahead. You can't really attach the PC to any certain "generation", since a new generation is determined by the release of new console hardware. You can't measure the PC in generations. PC hardware is miles ahead of console hardware though.
Avatar image for ShadowDeathX
ShadowDeathX

11699

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#52 ShadowDeathX
Member since 2006 • 11699 Posts
Can some one tell me what the max. bit rate for Loseless 7.1 Audio on a Playstation 3 is?? Seeing as the BD-Drive is mad slow on the Playstation 3, Stock Hard Drives are slow too, and the sound card is pretty generic, it can't be that high while playing a game.
Avatar image for James161324
James161324

8315

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 James161324
Member since 2009 • 8315 Posts

Its the hardware is a atleast 1 generation ahead. But devs aren't using it all, but look at most multiplats the pc games look many times better in most cases.

Even looking at bc2 which was a crappy console port, the pc to console is a major difference.

Avatar image for Captain__Tripps
Captain__Tripps

4523

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 Captain__Tripps
Member since 2006 • 4523 Posts
What exactly did the 360 do besides better graphics than the xbox? PC is a generation or more ahead of consoles hardware wise. You guys should be getting new hardware on the horizon, but your not.
Avatar image for Marka1700
Marka1700

7500

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 Marka1700
Member since 2003 • 7500 Posts
Metro 2033 on Very high is almost an entire gen ahead of current consoles.
Avatar image for coreybg
coreybg

2608

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#56 coreybg
Member since 2009 • 2608 Posts

The only advantage PCs have over consoles is graphics

Blazerdt47

Better framerate

choice of controll

mods

cheaper games

features like steam,xfire, etc

free and good online

dedicated servers

free maps for most moddable games

can play with TV or monitor (yes, while sitting in your comfy sofa aswell)

better and upgradable hardware

Any questions TC?

Avatar image for James161324
James161324

8315

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 James161324
Member since 2009 • 8315 Posts

What exactly did the 360 do besides better graphics than the xbox? PC is a generation or more ahead of consoles hardware wise. You guys should be getting new hardware on the horizon, but your not.Captain__Tripps

They should be but now it seems everyone in the gaming idustury is thinking 2015.

Avatar image for Vesica_Prime
Vesica_Prime

7062

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#58 Vesica_Prime
Member since 2009 • 7062 Posts

Yup, it's always the PC gaming super menace that constantly makes these sort of threads. :roll:

Avatar image for ManicAce
ManicAce

3267

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 0

#59 ManicAce
Member since 2009 • 3267 Posts
No one knows what next gen will be like or when it hits so it's a useless comparison. But if we use last gen as comparison I'd say that Crysis = Farcry and BF3 = BF2. Were those games a generation ahead..maybe not quite, but they were close.
Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#60 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

No one knows what next gen will be like or when it hits so it's a useless comparison. But if we use last gen as comparison I'd say that Crysis = Farcry and BF3 = BF2. Were those games a generation ahead..maybe not quite, but they were close.ManicAce
OMG, BF3 is suppose to be shown tomorrow with full gameplay video and not like last week's teasers, can't wait.:D

Avatar image for HaloinventedFPS
HaloinventedFPS

4738

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 HaloinventedFPS
Member since 2010 • 4738 Posts

GTA4 with mods is allready a gen ahead, here is a video, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SukKvn8ZclQ

Avatar image for adamosmaki
adamosmaki

10718

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#62 adamosmaki
Member since 2007 • 10718 Posts

[QUOTE="i5750at4Ghz"]

The hardware is a generation ahead. This is what we mean. The fact few games take advatage of this fact doesn't change it.

D1zzyCriminal

This is exactly what it means.

i will go as far and say the hardware is 2 generations ahead But sadly only a few games take advantage of it. Thank god though for the occasionally arma 2, Shogun 2 and the witcher 2 and the occasional "put a great deal of effort into the pc version of a multiplat game" ( aka metro 2033, BC2 and couple more )
Avatar image for SoraX64
SoraX64

29221

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#63 SoraX64
Member since 2008 • 29221 Posts

Yup, it's always the PC gaming super menace that constantly makes these sort of threads. :roll:

Vesica_Prime
I know, the PC gamers always get blamed for PC threads but it's almost never the PC gamers that make them. :(
Avatar image for DeckardLee2010
DeckardLee2010

402

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 DeckardLee2010
Member since 2010 • 402 Posts

[QUOTE="kozzy1234"]

Are you joking? The difference between PC and current consoles is MUCH more of a jump then ps2 to ps3 and xbox to xbox360.

Go play Metro or Crysis on a real godo computer, that is WAAAAAAAAAY better looking thean any game on consoles can come even close to.

i5750at4Ghz

Not really. Go compare god of war 2 to god of war 3. The gap is major compared to that of uc2 to crysis.

GOW2 > GOW3 was nothing like Super Mario World > Super Mario 64. What's your point? It takes more and more to get the same boost. The point is, is that, hardware in PCs right now, is hardware (in quality) that will be in NG consoles assuming they don't go the Wii route.

Avatar image for devious742
devious742

3924

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 devious742
Member since 2003 • 3924 Posts

Yup, it's always the PC gaming super menace that constantly makes these sort of threads. :roll:

Vesica_Prime

hmmm.. The Topic creator isnt a hermit... in fact hes talking down on PC gaming

Avatar image for Jankarcop
Jankarcop

11058

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 Jankarcop
Member since 2011 • 11058 Posts

i'd say having double the fps, sub720p vs 1080p or higher, dx11, sometimes double the online players is next gen'ish.

Avatar image for markop2003
markop2003

29917

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 markop2003
Member since 2005 • 29917 Posts

You'll need a PSU that's over 9000 for that.:P

But joking aside, maybe the highest which is over a 1000 can handle that.

mitu123
There was a 2kw external PSU shown at CES a couple years back. Silverstone also does a 1500w and there are workstation cases that support dual power supplies.
Avatar image for topgunmv
topgunmv

10880

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#68 topgunmv
Member since 2003 • 10880 Posts

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

You'll need a PSU that's over 9000 for that.:P

But joking aside, maybe the highest which is over a 1000 can handle that.

markop2003

There was a 2kw external PSU shown at CES a couple years back. Silverstone also does a 1500w and there are workstation cases that support dual power supplies.

That has to be right on the edge of how much power you can safely get from a home wall socket.

Avatar image for Vesica_Prime
Vesica_Prime

7062

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#69 Vesica_Prime
Member since 2009 • 7062 Posts

[QUOTE="Vesica_Prime"]

Yup, it's always the PC gaming super menace that constantly makes these sort of threads. :roll:

devious742

hmmm.. The Topic creator isnt a hermit... in fact hes talking down on PC gaming

It was a sarcastic comment...

Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#70 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

GTA4 with mods is allready a gen ahead, here is a video, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SukKvn8ZclQ

HaloinventedFPS

LOL, it does look better than most console games out there.

Avatar image for topsemag55
topsemag55

19063

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#71 topsemag55
Member since 2007 • 19063 Posts

[QUOTE="Blazerdt47"]

The only advantage PCs have over consoles is graphics

coreybg

Better framerate

choice of controll

mods

cheaper games

features like steam,xfire, etc

free and good online

dedicated servers

free maps for most moddable games

can play with TV or monitor (yes, while sitting in your comfy sofa aswell)

better and upgradable hardware

Add full control over CPU/GPU usage, game settings, OC'ing CPU & GPU if desired.

Avatar image for SapSacPrime
SapSacPrime

8925

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#72 SapSacPrime
Member since 2004 • 8925 Posts

Why do the console gamers keep gunning for the PC gamers? you are using 5 year old hardware verses new hardware with a far larger price tag... how do you expect to win exactly? anyway if you look at the usual console time line we should have new console on the horizon by now so PC's being a gen ahead is a fair argument.

Avatar image for SPYDER0416
SPYDER0416

16736

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#73 SPYDER0416
Member since 2008 • 16736 Posts

A generation ahead is nothing more then hyperbole. As good as PC's look the hardware isn't nearly as impressive as it owuld be if it were an actual generation ahead.

Compare GTA: San Andreas to GTA IV. Now, compare the console version of BC2 with the PC version. Unless you are blind you aren't going to say that BC2 showcases more hardware changes and the same goes for Crysis 2 and Just Cause 2.

I mean yeah, PC games look great. Good for you, but its definitely not a generation ahead, and the gameplay/sound/AI are about exactly the same as on consoles.

Avatar image for coreybg
coreybg

2608

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#74 coreybg
Member since 2009 • 2608 Posts

I like how TC leaves his thread when it backfires :P

Avatar image for haberman13
haberman13

2414

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 haberman13
Member since 2003 • 2414 Posts

It's impossible for me to be impressed by console graphics:

fake backgrounds

DoF

no-AA

corridor levels

low rez textures

That pretty much sums it up, console games are all about "tricks" to project reality (think of the skybox wallpapers), PC actually RENDERs those scenes.

When UC2/GEOW goes open world, maintains those graphics with minimal popin - I'll be impressed.

Avatar image for haberman13
haberman13

2414

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 haberman13
Member since 2003 • 2414 Posts

A generation ahead is nothing more then hyperbole. As good as PC's look the hardware isn't nearly as impressive as it owuld be if it were an actual generation ahead.

Compare GTA: San Andreas to GTA IV. Now, compare the console version of BC2 with the PC version. Unless you are blind you aren't going to say that BC2 showcases more hardware changes and the same goes for Crysis 2 and Just Cause 2.

I mean yeah, PC games look great. Good for you, but its definitely not a generation ahead, and the gameplay/sound/AI are about exactly the same as on consoles.

SPYDER0416

I disagree. The only way you can say this is by looking at multiplats, which of course aren't a "generation" ahead as they also run on console (3 generations behind).

Lets just use what you cited: BC2 has a sound mode called "war tapes" (have you heard it?) Compare that to console - its a different world, truly. Can't hear that on console.

Graphically BC2 is a port, but compare the two side by side - BC2 PC looks like a different game, especially at 2560x1600.

AI - can't compare a multiplat here, since consoles have held back AI development - needless to say a PC CPU has 100000000 more free cycles for AI.

So really two things are happening in PC gaming - consoles are holding them back, that is true, but the trend is shifting - PCs are now thet primary platform for a bunch of games, which will then be gimped for console hardware. So, PC reigns supreme, even in a land of terrible console multiplats. It will continue to reign supreme and more-so as games are deved for PC and then stripped down for console.

Avatar image for stvee101
stvee101

2953

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#77 stvee101
Member since 2006 • 2953 Posts

I think the word is "potentially".

PC are definitely potentially at least a generation ahead,its just we rarely see the evidence since all the traditional PC devs have switched their focus to consoles,meaning the full power of todays PC hardware is hardly ever exploited.

Avatar image for nameless12345
nameless12345

15125

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#78 nameless12345
Member since 2010 • 15125 Posts

In terms of graphics power, PCs are a few generations ahead from consoles. The graphics chips Xbox 360 and PS3 (not to mention the Wii) use are outdated since long on the PC and not even all PC games run on them.

In terms of CPUs the power difference is also big although console CPUs may have a more specific architecture.

And in terms of RAM you can have far more RAM on the PC.

However, the console gens are different to PC gens because on the PC a new gen comes out every year or even sooner, while consoles get successors in a few years.

So if you're asking whether the current PCs already display the graphics we will see in the next generation consoles I will say that I don't have the answer and neither does anyone else. We'll just have to wait and see and then judge. But I personally think that the next gen consoles will have more visually impressive graphics than what current PCs display.

Avatar image for haberman13
haberman13

2414

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 haberman13
Member since 2003 • 2414 Posts

I think the word is "potentially".

PC are definitely potentially at least a generation ahead,its just we rarely see the evidence since all the traditional PC devs have switched their focus to consoles,meaning the full power of todays PC hardware is hardly ever exploited.

stvee101

Right.

Some games like JC2 (a multiplat) look 2+ generations newer on PC. Decked out JC2 is impressive, while on console looks like a muddy mess of badness.

So multiplat doesn't necessarily mean it won't use the PC strenghths. Most devs just don't care, its all about the $.

Avatar image for NaveedLife
NaveedLife

17179

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#80 NaveedLife
Member since 2010 • 17179 Posts

The only advantage PCs have over consoles is graphics...

Blazerdt47

You failed before you even finished your first sentence.

Avatar image for AiurProtoss
AiurProtoss

1080

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#81 AiurProtoss
Member since 2010 • 1080 Posts

Okay hermits I have my popcorn and twizzlers, commence to rape thread.

CB4McGusto

lol this made me laugh out load in the computerlab just now LOLOLOLO.

Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#82 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts

The hardware is a generation ahead. This is what we mean. The fact few games take advatage of this fact doesn't change it.

i5750at4Ghz

Its more than a generation a head actually.. More like 3 generatiosn ahead hardware wise...

Avatar image for DJ_Headshot
DJ_Headshot

6427

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#83 DJ_Headshot
Member since 2010 • 6427 Posts
The problem is your assuming next-gen will see as big a jump in graphics ps2 to ps3. The next generation of console won't be as powerful sony learned there lesson about launching a $600 console current highend gpu's will already have surpassed the next-gen consoles graphical capabilities for the entire consoles lifespan you can quote me on that.
Avatar image for Xtasy26
Xtasy26

5589

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 53

User Lists: 0

#84 Xtasy26
Member since 2008 • 5589 Posts

The only advantage PCs have over consoles is graphics and even that isn't a generation ahead, it's not the leap from PS2 to PS3 at the moment, hermits are too ecstatic over it. What about gameplay, sound, animations? I have yet to see a PC game match a game like Killzone 3 or Uncharted 2 in sound/animation.

Let's not get ahead of ourselves here.

Blazerdt47

Uh...one HD 4800 series graphics card is MORE POWERFUL than the combined power of the Xbox 360 + PS3 + all the consoles ever made in the history of the world. How is that not a generation ahead?

As for sound, how is Crysis's sound bad?

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

61997

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#85 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 61997 Posts

In terms of hardware, I would absolutely say they are. In terms of games, not so much, though certain games could be deemed "a generation ahead" in terms of graphics.

Anyway, whoever is stating that something is a generation ahead is simply doing so using arbitrary means. We have no defined measuring stick, other than it the next console released in the cycle (PC's generations reset upon the release of the first "next-gen" console in SW).

Avatar image for jedikevin2
jedikevin2

5263

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 0

#86 jedikevin2
Member since 2004 • 5263 Posts

The only advantage PCs have over consoles is graphics and even that isn't a generation ahead, it's not the leap from PS2 to PS3 at the moment, hermits are too ecstatic over it. What about gameplay, sound, animations? I have yet to see a PC game match a game like Killzone 3 or Uncharted 2 in sound/animation.

Let's not get ahead of ourselves here.

Blazerdt47

The only advantage?

I thought pc gamers like to talk about:

  • Freedom
  • Access to the biggest back catalog of games
  • Biggest assortment of exclusives
  • Price of many new release games.
  • Use of just about any controller in a prethara of games.
  • Immersion (triple screen ability)
  • Offcourse Graphics. (higher Res, textues, particle affects, physics, shaders, etc etc)
  • D2D deals (Ex. Direct2drive 20% off discount coupon + preordering games for 10+ dollars off with code or Big Steam deals)

Gameplay, sound, animation? Not even worth debating as thats just pure opinion vs. opinion. I am still confused where this "only" comes from.

Avatar image for painguy1
painguy1

8686

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#87 painguy1
Member since 2007 • 8686 Posts

Crysis 60fps 1920x1080 Very High on GTX 580.....Crysis 2 console @ ~30fps 1152x720 mediumish....

Avatar image for NanoMan88
NanoMan88

1220

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#88 NanoMan88
Member since 2006 • 1220 Posts

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

People are hating on BC2's sounds? WTF, they are amazing and I love how it it changes depending on the distance you're at as it's more realistic than UC2 and KZ3(even some reviews state BC2 has better sound than KZ3), and Battlefield 3 is even said to outdo them. UC2's gun sounds don't sound as good as BC2's either, fix the AK already.

Put it on Wartapes and see what I mean.

rawr89

yes, because in Uncharted 2, gun sounds is all that matters. UC2 guns aren't supposed to sound like BC2 because it's not a battlefield, it's an adventure. if UC2 guns had BC2 gun sounds i'd be annoyed. it'd seem like Drake is a soldier partaknig in a war. can you imagine, if UC2 had those BC2 sounds in the Himalayas or in the jungle, it wouldn't really sound and feel right. it works for BC2 because you're on the battlefield. but for UC2 i don't think it suits the game and the essence of exploration/adventure.

on the same note, UC2 has full-on orchestra sounds and dialogues. so no, UC2 doesn't only have guns.

What does this even mean? so if a person who fires a gun is not a soldier, that said gun will sound different for him? In BC2 with the right settings, soundcard and setup you can here the creaks of machine gun turrets. Sounds like your just butthurt that your last desperate attempt: audio quality has still been surpassed by PC.

Avatar image for LookAnDrolL
LookAnDrolL

2483

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#89 LookAnDrolL
Member since 2008 • 2483 Posts
[QUOTE="kozzy1234"]

Are you joking? The difference between PC and current consoles is MUCH more of a jump then ps2 to ps3 and xbox to xbox360.

Go play Metro or Crysis on a real godo computer, that is WAAAAAAAAAY better looking thean any game on consoles can come even close to.

i5750at4Ghz
Not really. Go compare god of war 2 to god of war 3. The gap is major compared to that of uc2 to crysis.

SD vs HD, are you for real???
Avatar image for Sir_Graham
Sir_Graham

3983

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#90 Sir_Graham
Member since 2002 • 3983 Posts
PC game development is being held back by consoles at an ever increasing rate. There was once a time when PC and consoles almost lived in two seperate worlds with very few PC developers making games on consoles. Since the Xbox PC developers have been moving to consoles in large numbers to reach a larger audience and increase sales. This has hurt both traditional console developers (Japanese ones in particular) and the quality of games on the PC.

The reason why PC games don't appear to be a generation ahead is because most games are multiplat or are using graphics engines designed for consoles. Back in the 80s and 90s this was much rarer, even the early 00s it wasn't that common because the only PC developer friendly console back then was the Xbox and it didn't have the largest fanbase. Now you have the 360 with a larger fanbase as well as the PS3 which is much more PC developer friendly than the PS2.
Avatar image for flashn00b
flashn00b

3961

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#91 flashn00b
Member since 2006 • 3961 Posts

Serious Sam 3 will probably show the gap between PC and console multiplayer, solely because of 16 players co-op, and it's likely that the console will only get 4 player co-op.

Additionally, Battlefield 3 will have 64 players.

Avatar image for -Unreal-
-Unreal-

24650

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 1

#92 -Unreal-
Member since 2004 • 24650 Posts

The only advantage PCs have over consoles is graphics and even that isn't a generation ahead, it's not the leap from PS2 to PS3 at the moment, hermits are too ecstatic over it. What about gameplay, sound, animations? I have yet to see a PC game match a game like Killzone 3 or Uncharted 2 in sound/animation.

Let's not get ahead of ourselves here.

Blazerdt47
PC hardware is miles ahead of the current consoles. You can't talk about hardware and explain how there's no software out for that hardware to show off how far ahead the hardware is. PC hardware on paper is much much more powerful than the consoles. If you think the sound is better on a console too, you need to invest in a better sound card like an Asus Xonar and some Sennheisers.
Avatar image for rpgs_shall_rule
rpgs_shall_rule

1943

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#93 rpgs_shall_rule
Member since 2006 • 1943 Posts
If the PC isn't (at the very, very least) a generation ahead, then you consolers have absolutely no basis to argue about this or that difference between the Xbox 360 or the PS3. If someone cries "kz3 is a gen ahead of halo reach", yet in the same breath turns around and denies the enormous difference in graphics between Crysis and Killzone 3, don't you think that's just a little hypocritical?
Avatar image for theshadowhunter
theshadowhunter

2956

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#94 theshadowhunter
Member since 2004 • 2956 Posts

Hardware wise they have always been ahead, game wise this is true as well, though consoles are ruining our games for us.

Avatar image for oldkingallant
oldkingallant

4958

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#95 oldkingallant
Member since 2010 • 4958 Posts

The only advantage PCs have over consoles is graphics and even that isn't a generation ahead, it's not the leap from PS2 to PS3 at the moment, hermits are too ecstatic over it. What about gameplay, sound, animations? I have yet to see a PC game match a game like Killzone 3 or Uncharted 2 in sound/animation.

Let's not get ahead of ourselves here.

Blazerdt47
That's cute, you really think there are no PC games with sound and animation as good as Uncharted 2 or Killzone 3. I made the jump to PC gaming a few months ago, and you will never know unless you try it yourself, but the technology is a complete generation ahead and the current top of the line PC parts are likely what you'll see in next gen consoles.
Avatar image for imprezawrx500
imprezawrx500

19187

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#96 imprezawrx500
Member since 2004 • 19187 Posts
put it this way consoles struggle to run 720p at a solid 30fps and all the settings are pretty much low settings. even a two or so year old pc can run 1080p with a solid 40-60fps. There reason why you don't see much in the gameplay department is because most games are multiple so console limit the game. If a game was built around requiring a quad core cpu. 4gb ram and a radeon 4870 or better consoles would be left in the dust.
Avatar image for krayzieE99
krayzieE99

544

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#97 krayzieE99
Member since 2010 • 544 Posts

The only advantage PCs have over consoles is graphics and even that isn't a generation ahead, it's not the leap from PS2 to PS3 at the moment, hermits are too ecstatic over it. What about gameplay, sound, animations? I have yet to see a PC game match a game like Killzone 3 or Uncharted 2 in sound/animation.

Let's not get ahead of ourselves here.

Blazerdt47

uncharted2 and killzone 3 look really really good. IMO better than other console games, but honestly i was playing in HD on my pc like 10 years ago, no joke.

Avatar image for TheAcountantMan
TheAcountantMan

1281

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#98 TheAcountantMan
Member since 2011 • 1281 Posts
The PC version of NFS Pro Street that came out what 4-5 years ago makes Gran Turismo 5 look like the noob driving simulator.
Avatar image for LOXO7
LOXO7

5595

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#99 LOXO7
Member since 2008 • 5595 Posts
The PC is broken with piracy, over hyped, and neutral.
Avatar image for deactivated-635601fd996cc
deactivated-635601fd996cc

4381

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#100 deactivated-635601fd996cc
Member since 2009 • 4381 Posts
The PC is broken with piracy, over hyped, and neutral.LOXO7
Can I get an hallelujah to trolling?!