i was commenting about the overall value of consoles lately , and someone told me you can't depend on hardware or software alone to determine value as they are both subjective, i wasn't that convinced , i thought games and software are subjective but hardware value isn't.So that Q came into my mind, How can a console with 50%+ failure rate considered a success or a real value,even if we really are taking all the factors in consideration, this horrible hardware should be removed immediately from any contest over top 100 best gaming consoles .... another word to describe it " a potentially peice of garbage"
There is no excuse, free repair or wutever, i just can't sit on edge waiting for my console to break any minute. i really dunthink supporters of this kind of hardware can bash any other consoles for any reason, i think hardware failures are the absolute thing that's not subjectives unlike games.
2mrw
I though it was 100% failure rate, actuallyh i read news that noone on the planet actually plays xbox 360, all have failed
That is why all multipltform games sell zero on 360 and sell so huge on PS3
And that is why Halo 3 did not even sell 15 million too !!! Probably the zero working 360 is the reason for Fable 2 selling only 4 million too, while PS3 that works for everyone has more than a billion Uncharted 2 and GOW3sales
Log in to comment