This topic is locked from further discussion.
because the review was unbiased had alot of fun and gave it points for some many great features, tune ups and awesomness.
ps user scores? lol do know how many ppl mark a game for being bad because its exclusive like a game halo, i believe halo is the number 1 hated game by fanboys.
dude
fps vs a platformer.
fanboys need to just stfu already. scores are scores.
you cant compare mgs4 to smg when it comes to scores. there different games
if you want to argue a score comparision it should be on multiplats
The question should be how did SMG achieve that score.
I thought SMG was crap, tbh. Just like every other 3d mario. Bring back 2nd mario games already Nintendo.
Tykain
SMG and Crap in the same sentence!?
What?
Just kidding. Your opinion, though, I must say, I disagree.
[QUOTE="Tykain"]The question should be how did SMG achieve that score.
I thought SMG was crap, tbh. Just like every other 3d mario. Bring back 2nd mario games already Nintendo.
Haziqonfire
SMG and Crap in the same sentence!?
What?
Just kidding. Your opinion, though, I must say, I disagree.
I'm exagerating, of course. It got great reviews everywhere and many people love the game, so it can't be that bad. But personaly i stoped enjoying mario games ever since it went 3d and SMG was no exception. But i loved mario on the NES and SNES.
user scores mean nothing when website are overrun by fanboys. this site is full of cowsmephisto_11
The majority of System Wars users are 360 fanboys...but the number is becoming more, and more equal.
Because it has more content than any console in existance, all of which is produced to a very high quality. :| Also... you cant just ignore the entire online portion of the game "because i dont have live". That makes no sense at all. All of that content is still there; it shouldnt be ignored because you choose not to play online.
It's like saying SMG is useless if you only play online.
Is this a joke. In no way is Halo as innovative, fun, and exicting as Super Mario Galaxy. I mean look at the user scores Halo 3 (8.9) and SMG(9.3). Halo 3 single player is nothing to SMG and if you don't have live the online is usless. COD4 is better anyway. Dark-Pain
Nope, not a joke at all. Your opinion=nothing:)
The user score comment made me laugh. How many fakeboy cows have given Halo 3 a zero? Exactly. The Halo series takes more flak than any other game, so I wouldn't use an anonymous scoring system on a game site that attracts fanboys to judge its quality.
Also, Halo 3's lasting appeal >>>>>>>>>>>>> SMG's: Forge, lots of maps, lots of gametypes, different playlists every weekend, etc.
Is this a joke. In no way is Halo as innovative, fun, and exicting as Super Mario Galaxy. I mean look at the user scores Halo 3 (8.9) and SMG(9.3). Halo 3 single player is nothing to SMG and if you don't have live the online is usless. COD4 is better anyway. Dark-Pain
Will start with smg doesn't have multiplayer. But really heres why. Does that prove halo 3 should have got a the same score? Not necessarily but it does prove why smg is not as great a platformer as its made out to be.
[QUOTE="mephisto_11"]user scores mean nothing when website are overrun by fanboys. this site is full of cowsthe_dark-knight
The majority of System Wars users are 360 fanboys...but the number is becoming more, and more equal.
lol no, have u seen polls thro the last months all ps3 related thing wins, wins, wins if there were more lemmings u'd think the 360 would win those polls.Is this a joke. In no way is Halo as innovative, fun, and exicting as Super Mario Galaxy. I mean look at the user scores Halo 3 (8.9) and SMG(9.3). Halo 3 single player is nothing to SMG and if you don't have live the online is usless. COD4 is better anyway. Dark-Pain
lol, opinion.
Is this a joke. In no way is Halo as innovative, fun, and exicting as Super Mario Galaxy. I mean look at the user scores Halo 3 (8.9) and SMG(9.3). Halo 3 single player is nothing to SMG and if you don't have live the online is usless. COD4 is better anyway. Dark-Pain
I guess SMG graphics for 3 year olds kinda hurt it.
Is this a joke. In no way is Halo as innovative, fun, and exicting as Super Mario Galaxy. I mean look at the user scores Halo 3 (8.9) and SMG(9.3). Halo 3 single player is nothing to SMG and if you don't have live the online is usless. COD4 is better anyway. Dark-Pain
Since your into comparing apples to oranges. How does a game like Mario score as well as Halo? There is no REAL multiplayer online or off. No free levels to download to keep things fresh. No theatre mode where you can save your battles then show to all your friends how well or poorly you did. Worst of all there is no level editor. SMG is just another M64 with a new paint job, nothing original in it.
By the way In my house we use splitscreen multiplayer online AND offline all the time. So stating that multiplayer is useless without live is a false statement just like everything else you said.
[QUOTE="mephisto_11"]user scores mean nothing when website are overrun by fanboys. this site is full of cowsthe_dark-knight
The majority of System Wars users are 360 fanboys...but the number is becoming more, and more equal.
Yeah, but Halo gets alot of hate naturally. Youll have some topic completly unrelated to halo here, and someone will find an excuse to get a crack at Halo.
You'll even get user reviews that rate 5 and below which is really only number meant for games that are broken and near unplayable which is just stupid.
[QUOTE="the_dark-knight"][QUOTE="mephisto_11"]user scores mean nothing when website are overrun by fanboys. this site is full of cowsvashkey
The majority of System Wars users are 360 fanboys...but the number is becoming more, and more equal.
Yeah, but Halo gets alot of hate naturally. Youll have some topic completly unrelated to halo here, and someone will find an excuse to get a crack at Halo.
You'll even get user reviews that rate 5 and below which is really only number meant for games that are broken and near unplayable which is just stupid.
Its unfortunate but I think the hate for the fans transfers onto the game. You have to admit when halo 3 was coming some people acted like they were releasing god, over hype and over rating a series really in the end doesn't do it alot of good.
Halo has 33,000 user scores.. SMG has 11,000
Halo gets bashed by people who have never played it everyday.. do you really think user scores are a good way of judging anything?
user_nat
Also, 10% of users who have rated Halo 3 have rated it "abysmal", or given it a zero.
[QUOTE="user_nat"]Halo has 33,000 user scores.. SMG has 11,000
Halo gets bashed by people who have never played it everyday.. do you really think user scores are a good way of judging anything?
Ninja-Hippo
Also, 10% of users who have rated Halo 3 have rated it "abysmal", or given it a zero.
i assume those are haters? Shameful.The majority of 360 owners have XBL, that's the whole point of owning one. CoD4 is V short without live. I don't particulaly like Halo MP, but I love co-op and still play it with my son. We just started the trilogy again.
Once you've got all the stars on SMG (which isn't that hard), what else is there to do?
Who are you to try and say that Halo 3 isn't fun and exciting? I agree SMG is fun and exciting, but Halo 3 is one of those games where you will always find alot of people to play with. I mean look at Halo 2; the MP still isn't dead...Saying COD4 is better is all opinion and yours isn't that important as anyone else's here. Halo 3 not innovative? Where else will you find a console FPS that has so much features to use? Forge, Taking screens from your online sessions, and making your own videos in the game?
I know the hate will never stop for Halo 3, but man...Halo 3 has a massive Hate resistance barrier up and you certainly will not be able to penetrate it just yet my friend.
Is this a joke. In no way is Halo as innovative, fun, and exicting as Super Mario Galaxy. I mean look at the user scores Halo 3 (8.9) and SMG(9.3). Halo 3 single player is nothing to SMG and if you don't have live the online is usless. COD4 is better anyway. Dark-Pain
I think the real question is how did SMG get a high score? Its fun for maybe a day unless you're 12 Halo is just fun.
Because game critics seem to have been drawn into the recent trend that multiplayer can pick up the slack for a mediocre single player experience the same as game developers.-The-G-Man-
For the record, I think Halo 3's single player experience was far more than mediocre. No, it wasn't revolutionary, no it wasn't innovative and as far as I'm concerned, it doesn't need to be.
And what's wrong with the multiplayer "picking up the slack"? Is it not a very large aspect of the game? Is it not something that many people are expecting to be good? Bungie should put large amounts of their resources into making it as good as it can be and I believe they achieved that. It may have been outshined by Call of Duty 4 but it still features a great deal of content and customizabilty for practically any type of gamer (Grifball and Rocket Race are my two favorite multiplayer modes over Slayer or any of its variants, just saying)
So yeah, in my opinion Halo 3 deserved its score. It was a very high quality game and I don't feel multiplayer should be glossed over or excluded in this or any discussion concerning its quality.
how long is smg anyway at an average? I saw this place at a mall that lets you play wii per hour and it has SMG, i could go there and finish it in one day, if that's possible of course... is it?barneyalfonso
Start to finnish if you never played 12h I'd give it a 8 its a good kids game but nothing more.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment