How Far Would PC Be Right Now If It Weren't Held Back By Consoles?

  • 182 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for black_chamber99
black_chamber99

1696

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 black_chamber99
Member since 2010 • 1696 Posts

if pc had never been held back by consoles what type of graphics and tech would we be seeing right now?

would we be already be playing this?

original_d.jpg

Avatar image for Maneil99
Maneil99

842

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Maneil99
Member since 2012 • 842 Posts

No this is a failed arguement. First of all you wouldn't have the funds to support these games, second you woulnd't be able to run them, high end GPUS like 680's and 7970's are getting 60-80 fps in games like farcry 3 and BF3, if you want to make the jump to these games then there is no way current gen GPUS could support them at playable framerates. Also low end - mid PC users make up the majority of users. There hasn't been a PC Exclusive that looks NEXT GEN, games like the Witcher 2 don't look head and shoulders over there console counterparts.

Get off your high horse jack ass

Avatar image for Jonwh18
Jonwh18

9350

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Jonwh18
Member since 2009 • 9350 Posts

Lol with out sconsoles Gaming would be much more of a niche. Kiss most of your big budget AAA multiplats good buy, because studios just plain wouldn't exist.

Avatar image for SaltyMeatballs
SaltyMeatballs

25165

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#4 SaltyMeatballs
Member since 2009 • 25165 Posts
No.
Avatar image for ShadowDeathX
ShadowDeathX

11699

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#5 ShadowDeathX
Member since 2006 • 11699 Posts
Who knows but I believe that a gaming PC with a GTS 250 or HD4850 would be considered the bottom of the pit gaming PCs. Meaning that those cards would be considered low-end hardware and developers would use them as minimum requirement level development only. but instead we still have developers putting that 6 year old GTS8800 as a minimum requirement.
Avatar image for ShadowDeathX
ShadowDeathX

11699

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#6 ShadowDeathX
Member since 2006 • 11699 Posts

Lol with out sconsoles Gaming would be much more of a niche. Kiss most of your big budget AAA multiplats good buy, because studios just plain wouldn't exist.

Jonwh18
I don't see that being a bad thing. :)
Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#7 Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts

No.

I prefer my games to actually be released, not spend 5 years in development modeling each blade of grass. Developers like money, they won't bother making games look that good. Takes way too long.

Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#8 Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts

Lol with out sconsoles Gaming would be much more of a niche. Kiss most of your big budget AAA multiplats good buy, because studios just plain wouldn't exist.

Jonwh18

Pretty much this.

PC gaming was tiny and would have stayed tiny if it wasn't for the consoles and handhelds expanding the market. An expansion to the market brought more people into PC gaming, helping it grow.

Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#9 ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts

if pc had never been held back by consoles what type of graphics and tech would we be seeing right now?

would we be already be playing this?

black_chamber99

Consoles helps the laptop PC market.

Avatar image for Mr_BillGates
Mr_BillGates

3211

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#10 Mr_BillGates
Member since 2005 • 3211 Posts

A sinking pirateship.

Avatar image for Ballroompirate
Ballroompirate

26695

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#11 Ballroompirate
Member since 2005 • 26695 Posts

[QUOTE="Jonwh18"]

Lol with out sconsoles Gaming would be much more of a niche. Kiss most of your big budget AAA multiplats good buy, because studios just plain wouldn't exist.

Wasdie

Pretty much this.

PC gaming was tiny and would have stayed tiny if it wasn't for the consoles and handhelds expanding the market. An expansion to the market brought more people into PC gaming, helping it grow.

I agree with Wasdie.

In the end PC helped console gaming and vice versa, without ether we wouldn't have the PC and console games we have today.

Avatar image for Jebus213
Jebus213

10056

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 Jebus213
Member since 2010 • 10056 Posts

games like the Witcher 2 don't look head and shoulders over there console counterparts.

Maneil99

lol...

360_texturedowngrade.png

PC_texturedowngrade.png

This is the best comparison. lol they have to use sprites for the console version.

360_shadows.png

PC_shadows.png

Avatar image for Goyoshi12
Goyoshi12

9687

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#13 Goyoshi12
Member since 2009 • 9687 Posts

Are PCs really being held back by consoles or just PC games?

Avatar image for Jebus213
Jebus213

10056

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 Jebus213
Member since 2010 • 10056 Posts

Lazy devs.

You know, if they actually spent the time to make a good optimized and stable PC version they might actually see some more sales and less piracy...Shocker.

Avatar image for Riadon2
Riadon2

1598

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 Riadon2
Member since 2011 • 1598 Posts

I'd say the Samaritan and UE4 demo's look that good, and those weren't even rendered on the best of today's hardware.

PC gaming is held back by consoles, but it is also held back by lazy devs, time constraints, and tight budgets.

Avatar image for lowe0
lowe0

13692

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 lowe0
Member since 2004 • 13692 Posts

Lazy devs.

You know, if they actually spent the time to make a good optimized and stable PC version they might actually see some more sales and less piracy...Shocker.

Jebus213
Ridiculous. Pirates may try to justify their behavior with some sort of perceived slight, but there's simply no excuse when they can just skip the game instead of pirating it, or wait for a Steam sale if it's not worth the asking price.
Avatar image for Riadon2
Riadon2

1598

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 Riadon2
Member since 2011 • 1598 Posts

[QUOTE="Jebus213"]

Lazy devs.

You know, if they actually spent the time to make a good optimized and stable PC version they might actually see some more sales and less piracy...Shocker.

lowe0

Ridiculous. Pirates may try to justify their behavior with some sort of perceived slight, but there's simply no excuse when they can just skip the game instead of pirating it, or wait for a Steam sale if it's not worth the asking price.

popcorn.gif

Avatar image for Jebus213
Jebus213

10056

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 Jebus213
Member since 2010 • 10056 Posts

but there's simply no excuse when they can just skip the game instead of pirating it, or wait for a Steam sale if it's not worth the asking price.lowe0

Well that's how you think. Not everyone is like you. Not everyone is as rational. A lot of people don't want to skip the game or wait a year or two for a sale....I'm going based off of what I see people say and do *rolls eyes*. If people see something that breaks the game for them they're more likely to pirate it more. Of course some of the people who pirate still see value in the game, but not enough pay for it.

BTW I'm saying there would be "less" piracy and more sales. Didn't say it was going to fully stop piracy.

Also, not everyone claims to play 5-10 minutes of video games out of the whole week or month then somehow finds the time to argue about them all the time on a gaming forum.

Avatar image for 04dcarraher
04dcarraher

23857

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#19 04dcarraher
Member since 2004 • 23857 Posts
Do consoles hold back PC gaming? Yes and no. On one hand we have multiplatform developers and games which have been the mainstay in games to maximize profits this generation. They have to design their games to work on the lowest common denominator which tends to be consoles. Because of the console limited memory and processing abilities the designs and options in games have to be compromised to be able to work in a resource limited environment. Which is why we see alot of games still running shader model 3 rendering methods, level sizes, detail, texture quality and effects that are not up to modern hardware abilities. Now the other side Pc developers can not create games that only target the top 10% of gamers with top tier hardware or they wouldn't be able to make money. They have to target the widest range of gamers within a certain range of the game's minimum and maximum requirements to promote the features that lures gamers and promotes advancement and change in pc gaming.
Avatar image for BigDaddyPOLO
BigDaddyPOLO

2251

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 BigDaddyPOLO
Member since 2005 • 2251 Posts

Lol with out sconsoles Gaming would be much more of a niche. Kiss most of your big budget AAA multiplats good buy, because studios just plain wouldn't exist.

Jonwh18

Wow

I would be

so completely ok with that

Avatar image for Maneil99
Maneil99

842

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 Maneil99
Member since 2012 • 842 Posts

[QUOTE="Jonwh18"]

Lol with out sconsoles Gaming would be much more of a niche. Kiss most of your big budget AAA multiplats good buy, because studios just plain wouldn't exist.

BigDaddyPOLO

Wow

I would be

so completely ok with that

Sorry but just because you are a hipster indie lover doesn't mean everyone else is. Without AAA releases DD sales fall, Graphic Engines aren't made, and there for you are actually taking a step backwards

Avatar image for Merex760
Merex760

4381

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#22 Merex760
Member since 2008 • 4381 Posts

Lol with out sconsoles Gaming would be much more of a niche. Kiss most of your big budget AAA multiplats good buy, because studios just plain wouldn't exist.

Jonwh18

A lot of your big budget console series or developers started on that "niche" platform PC. Besides, I'd be perfectly fine with a lot of these studios going away. It's not like they're pushing the industry forward with their "inventive" titles. Small indie devs create more unique experiences. It's sad.

Avatar image for mariokart64fan
mariokart64fan

20828

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 101

User Lists: 1

#23 mariokart64fan
Member since 2003 • 20828 Posts

before nintendo gaming was almost Dead so think about that one before making another thread in fact it was so bad that nintendo was even scared when it first entered and only tested in a certain amount of states before everyone else got it ,

without Nintendo -sega ms or sony also would never been where they were , thanks to atari who nearly killed the industry because they kept throwing same stuff out with no innovation going on `

secondly Nintendo was doing it just right before sony and ms came along , now all we ever hear about is graphics this graphics that shoot this shoot that ,

thirdly , now since all this happened without consoles developers wouldnt be here , not everyone can afford a high end pc

consoles are and will always be known as cheaper alternatives to pc gaming at least nintendo is ,

and thats who started it out anyway , i look at nintendo as the true console , sony and ms just want to be mini computers look at them always boosting about visuals , at least nintendo has a little something to distinct it self

which is why im looking forward to see more of the wii u ,

i could give a S#it less about what those 500 dolar consoles are going to do ,

because i already know their just going to be upgraded visuals and according to rumors , there will be some bad things about them that nintendo wii u doesnt have --such as- always on internet , blocking used games bla bla bla

fact is without consoles pc wouldnt be here! and it wouldnt have made it this far thats for sure

Avatar image for teuf_
Teuf_

30805

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 Teuf_
Member since 2004 • 30805 Posts

That demo os what you get if you target high-end PC hardware exclusively. PC games can't actually do that, since to you need to be able to scale down to really crappy hardware if you want to make a profit. So even without consoles you wouldn't get that.

Avatar image for PS360Wii4eva
PS360Wii4eva

297

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 PS360Wii4eva
Member since 2010 • 297 Posts

[QUOTE="Maneil99"]games like the Witcher 2 don't look head and shoulders over there console counterparts.

Jebus213

lol...

360_texturedowngrade.png

PC_texturedowngrade.png

This is the best comparison. lol they have to use sprites for the console version.

360_shadows.png

PC_shadows.png

Damn, is this the only thing a 1,000 extra does? Looks like the jump to next gen is not gonna be a significant one.
Avatar image for andmcq
andmcq

260

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#26 andmcq
Member since 2012 • 260 Posts

I installed Far Cry 3 today. It looks worse than Crysis 1, very bland. Consoles really are holding PCs back now, :( Far Cry 3 only uses ~600mb of RAM on PCs too...

Avatar image for 15strong
15strong

2806

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 15strong
Member since 2007 • 2806 Posts

No.

I prefer my games to actually be released, not spend 5 years in development modeling each blade of grass. Developers like money, they won't bother making games look that good. Takes way too long.

Wasdie

And use all that power to render each individual hair or every wire in a chain link fence, right? ;)

Avatar image for 04dcarraher
04dcarraher

23857

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#28 04dcarraher
Member since 2004 • 23857 Posts
[QUOTE="Jebus213"]

[QUOTE="Maneil99"]games like the Witcher 2 don't look head and shoulders over there console counterparts.

PS360Wii4eva

lol...

Damn, is this the only thing a 1,000 extra does? Looks like the jump to next gen is not gonna be a significant one.

lol, why do you think it takes an extra 1000?, a $100 graphics card allows it.

Avatar image for Spartan070
Spartan070

16497

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 Spartan070
Member since 2004 • 16497 Posts
Lol must be a joke thread
Avatar image for II_Seraphim_II
II_Seraphim_II

20534

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#30 II_Seraphim_II
Member since 2007 • 20534 Posts
Without consoles, there would be very little funding for PC games. People can complain as much as they want but the truth is that, without consoles, gaming would be a very niche hobby that most companies would not find profitable enough to spend millions developing games for. So without consoles, PC gaming would probably be back in the stone age.
Avatar image for Rocker6
Rocker6

13358

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 Rocker6
Member since 2009 • 13358 Posts

That demo os what you get if you target high-end PC hardware exclusively. PC games can't actually do that, since to you need to be able to scale down to really crappy hardware if you want to make a profit. So even without consoles you wouldn't get that.

Teufelhuhn

This, if we had only the PC, herms would quickly start chasing after each other. "Consoles hold back gaming" would be replaced with "Low-end peasants hold back gaming", or something like that. Thing is, there'll always be very few games on the market that'll be fully utilizing top of the end hardware...

Avatar image for tocool340
tocool340

21694

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#32 tocool340
Member since 2004 • 21694 Posts
Consoles are holding PC's back?...:?
Avatar image for RyviusARC
RyviusARC

5708

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 RyviusARC
Member since 2011 • 5708 Posts

Damn, is this the only thing a 1,000 extra does? Looks like the jump to next gen is not gonna be a significant one. PS360Wii4eva

Try this out for size.

Open them both in separate tabs then switch back and forth between both tabs to really see the difference.

.

Xbox 360.

w2x3601.jpg

.

.

.

.

.

PC

witcher2201110011717100.jpg

Avatar image for The__Kraken
The__Kraken

858

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 The__Kraken
Member since 2012 • 858 Posts

In a world without consoles, PCs would plug right into your brain, and use your mind as a screen. With all this amazing PC technology, we would have the cure for cancer and aids, and we would have solved world hunger. Alas, consoles exist, and thus, ruined the entire world.

Avatar image for IgGy621985
IgGy621985

5922

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 IgGy621985
Member since 2004 • 5922 Posts

As much as I love PC gaming, I actually want that good game sells. I can live without hyper-realistic graphics if that generates better gameplay and support for more platforms, and therefore better profit.

Yeah, Crysis was incredible and still is one of the best looking games out there. But all that glorious graphics was available only to a limited number of gamers who had really top of the notch gaming PCs.

At the end of the day, devs are starting to consider PC as a very viable and powerful platform again, so we get more graphically enhanced ports.

Avatar image for ultimate-k
ultimate-k

2348

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 ultimate-k
Member since 2010 • 2348 Posts

If we had no consoles, then we would have games build from the ground up for pc and alot more optermised. Looks at Hard Reset, Crysis, Metro 2033, these are incrediable looking games and show what the PC can do without being hold back.

Avatar image for bobbetybob
bobbetybob

19370

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#37 bobbetybob
Member since 2005 • 19370 Posts
It would look exactly the same as it does now.
Avatar image for locopatho
locopatho

24300

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 locopatho
Member since 2003 • 24300 Posts

That demo os what you get if you target high-end PC hardware exclusively. PC games can't actually do that, since to you need to be able to scale down to really crappy hardware if you want to make a profit. So even without consoles you wouldn't get that.

Teufelhuhn
Yeah totally this, there's a reason the best selling PC games like WOW and the Sims aren't graphical powerhouses, they need to scale down so everyone can play them.

If we had no consoles, then we would have games build from the ground up for pc and alot more optermised. Looks at Hard Reset, Crysis, Metro 2033, these are incrediable looking games and show what the PC can do without being hold back.

ultimate-k
2 of those 3 games are on consoles right now...
Avatar image for svenus97
svenus97

2318

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#39 svenus97
Member since 2009 • 2318 Posts

So PC devs that make PC games and are owned by PC games publishers are being held back by consoles? M'kay.

Avatar image for AzatiS
AzatiS

14969

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#40 AzatiS
Member since 2004 • 14969 Posts

No this is a failed arguement. First of all you wouldn't have the funds to support these games, second you woulnd't be able to run them, high end GPUS like 680's and 7970's are getting 60-80 fps in games like farcry 3 and BF3, if you want to make the jump to these games then there is no way current gen GPUS could support them at playable framerates. Also low end - mid PC users make up the majority of users. There hasn't been a PC Exclusive that looks NEXT GEN, games like the Witcher 2 don't look head and shoulders over there console counterparts.

Get off your high horse jack ass

Maneil99
You dont even know what you talking about bro. 1 thing to say . Crysis -- 2007. 6 years later. Most core gamers gaming 64bit 8 and easily upgradable to 16BG RAM. New GPUS are coming in 2-3 months also PC supposed to have DX 11 like how many years now. How many PC games we have seen yet to build on DX11? If a game like Crysis in 2007 blow up the waters , 6 years later with current powerhouses? OH BOY!! I dont even want to think about it. And yes , there was an PC exclusive that looked next - gen at its time VS 1 year old consoles already. CRYSIS!! You are in big denial bro.
Avatar image for o0squishy0o
o0squishy0o

2802

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#41 o0squishy0o
Member since 2007 • 2802 Posts

Honestly to say that consoles bring in the money... you do know that console lisencing takes a large amount of profit dont you? You know PC games would be alot cheaper, or we keep them at the same price and the extra money can be used for financial security or investment into the company. I cant think of a console exclusive that matches the dominance of World of Warcraft, The Sims in terms of pure financial pulling power. Call of Duty does massively well on PC and gives a supperior experience, PC brings games like Star-Craft, flight simulators, Minecraft, actual competetive FPS games etc, all of these I would argue the console lacks and does nothing better than what a PC can do.

Consoles have exclusives but they are all possible on PC and would be better on PC. The only thing PC gaming lacks is a fully feldged motion control system, although we can argue that a mouse does it best... ironically. But I mean a Wii-mote esqe device, we have the Razor thing but thats not exactly common place. Console gaming from what I understand, doesnt have sales that match steam and Origin. You are stuck with non dedicated servers. You have no real clan support to speak of. You have terrible microphones, you have very little 3rd party support for hardware, and when you do, its usually worse anyway.

Console gaming is the equivelant of buying the cheap alternative. People will do it because its cheaper and they are OK with lesser items. Some people shy away from PC gaming because they see it as an elitest/nerd thing that you dont play games on because you'll get owned, but they are used to consoles because it has the marketing that its an "everymans gaming platform" which is true but so is PC gaming.

Finally the best PC games are not on the consoles, so I am not sure any argument can be made to say consoles are backing up the PC...

Avatar image for gamespot4life
gamespot4life

1302

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 gamespot4life
Member since 2007 • 1302 Posts

if pc had never been held back by consoles what type of graphics and tech would we be seeing right now?

would we be already be playing this?

original_d.jpg

black_chamber99

I LOL at anyone who thinks gameplay will look this good on next gen consoles.....

Avatar image for silversix_
silversix_

26347

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 silversix_
Member since 2010 • 26347 Posts
everything is so poorly optimized on pc that it would've been no farther than it is now unless new fps standards were 15fps.
Avatar image for RyviusARC
RyviusARC

5708

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 RyviusARC
Member since 2011 • 5708 Posts

I LOL at anyone who thinks gameplay will look this good on next gen consoles.....

gamespot4life

It's not that impressive when you break down the tech.

If there were a Final Fantasy game using that engine it would probably be about as demanding as Far Cry 3 at near max settings.

Avatar image for FireEmblem_Man
FireEmblem_Man

20385

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#45 FireEmblem_Man
Member since 2004 • 20385 Posts

You honestly believe that console gaming is holding back PC gaming in general? The cost of developement is very high and it's too risky to push graphics beyond anyone. Also, software companies, that are non-gaming companies, are having trouble keeping up with hardware companies since they release new hardware fast.

Avatar image for lowe0
lowe0

13692

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 lowe0
Member since 2004 • 13692 Posts

[QUOTE="lowe0"]but there's simply no excuse when they can just skip the game instead of pirating it, or wait for a Steam sale if it's not worth the asking price.Jebus213

Well that's how you think. Not everyone is like you. Not everyone is as rational. A lot of people don't want to skip the game or wait a year or two for a sale....I'm going based off of what I see people say and do *rolls eyes*. If people see something that breaks the game for them they're more likely to pirate it more. Of course some of the people who pirate still see value in the game, but not enough pay for it.

BTW I'm saying there would be "less" piracy and more sales. Didn't say it was going to fully stop piracy.

Also, not everyone claims to play 5-10 minutes of video games out of the whole week or month then somehow finds the time to argue about them all the time on a gaming forum.

With the number of cheap and free games available, why bother with a game where something "breaks the game for them"? It's not a sensible use of one's time. And speaking of time....

I find it amusing that you're interested in how much time I spend gaming, but if you're going to do so, at least pull the accurate numbers first. I've spent 1.5 hours this past two weeks on Steam, and a few hours on Xbox. Given that you could have confirmed the Steam number with a quick Google, there's really no excuse for getting it wrong.

Anyway, getting back on topic, you know what's holding back PC gaming? Nothing. You're still getting exclusives made, so it's not console hardware. You have crowdfunding, so it's not publishers. And unsigned code still runs without restriction even on Windows 8, so it's not Microsoft. You're getting what the market will support, and since it turns out that it's a pretty good product in the end, I see no reason to complain about that.

Avatar image for gamespot4life
gamespot4life

1302

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 gamespot4life
Member since 2007 • 1302 Posts

[QUOTE="gamespot4life"]

I LOL at anyone who thinks gameplay will look this good on next gen consoles.....

RyviusARC

It's not that impressive when you break down the tech.

If there were a Final Fantasy game using that engine it would probably be about as demanding as Far Cry 3 at near max settings.

I guess your going to be one of the disappointed people when nex gen comes out.

Avatar image for GamerwillzPS
GamerwillzPS

8531

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 GamerwillzPS
Member since 2012 • 8531 Posts

It would be further.

Some multiplatform games on PC does sometimes give me the feeling that they are being held back by consoles. Crysis was a true showcase of what the PC is capable of, and that's from 2007.

This is why I'd like to see more big-budget PC exclusives and I think more developers should put the PC first before consoles.

Avatar image for RyviusARC
RyviusARC

5708

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 RyviusARC
Member since 2011 • 5708 Posts

I guess your going to be one of the disappointed people when nex gen comes out.

gamespot4life

Nah I mainly game on PC and only use consoles for a few exclusives.

Avatar image for gamespot4life
gamespot4life

1302

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 gamespot4life
Member since 2007 • 1302 Posts

[QUOTE="gamespot4life"]

I guess your going to be one of the disappointed people when nex gen comes out.

RyviusARC

Nah I mainly game on PC and only use consoles for a few exclusives.

Same here, now anyway. just got a gtx 660 ti and havent played any of my consoles for about 2 weeks now. waiting for farcry 3 actually.