How is the ps3 more powerful than the xbox 360 if...

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Kaszilla
Kaszilla

1841

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Kaszilla
Member since 2011 • 1841 Posts

the xbox 360 has a better gpu, more vram, and can push more polygons

Avatar image for DCSullyvan
DCSullyvan

320

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 DCSullyvan
Member since 2011 • 320 Posts

Itz teh Cell. TEH CELL.

Avatar image for lawlessx
lawlessx

48753

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#3 lawlessx
Member since 2004 • 48753 Posts

How dare you ignore the power of the cell!:

Avatar image for Shinobi120
Shinobi120

5728

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Shinobi120
Member since 2004 • 5728 Posts

the xbox 360 has a better gpu, more vram, and can push more polygonsKaszilla

If anything, the PS3 & the 360 have the exact same specs between each other. Only reason why 1st/2nd party games on the PS3 looked better than most games on the 360 was because that Sony's developers had more experience & talent in hardware than what MS does within their 1st/2nd party developers.

Avatar image for SaltyMeatballs
SaltyMeatballs

25165

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#5 SaltyMeatballs
Member since 2009 • 25165 Posts
The cell makes up for PS3 bottlenecks, and then some (though clearly not that much is left).
Avatar image for eboyishere
eboyishere

12681

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 eboyishere
Member since 2011 • 12681 Posts

it's all about teh cell baby

Avatar image for PAL360
PAL360

30574

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 31

User Lists: 0

#7 PAL360
Member since 2007 • 30574 Posts

It isnt. Both have the same capabilities and latest games are the proof.

Avatar image for BilkeLegenda
BilkeLegenda

1933

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 BilkeLegenda
Member since 2009 • 1933 Posts

Its not more powerful,the only difference is that ps3 has blu-ray which hold more data and 360 has dvd which holds less data which results in multiple discs where as blu-ray holds everything in one disc.Its just a minor inconvenience for 360 users.

Avatar image for TheMoreYouOwn
TheMoreYouOwn

3927

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 TheMoreYouOwn
Member since 2010 • 3927 Posts

UC2, and the ps3 exclusives library.

Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts

[QUOTE="Kaszilla"]

the xbox 360 has a better gpu, more vram, and can push more polygonsgarland51

If anything, the PS3 & the 360 have the exact same specs between each other. Only reason why 1st/2nd party games on the PS3 looked better than most games on the 360 was because that Sony's developers had more experience & talent in hardware than what MS does within their 1st/2nd party developers.

They don't have the same hardware so they can't have the same specs. A better way to phrase it is that they are basically equivalent in what they can do but there would always be some differences.
Avatar image for JordanizPro
JordanizPro

1912

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 JordanizPro
Member since 2009 • 1912 Posts
[QUOTE="lawlessx"]

How dare you ignore the power of the cell!:

lol i was wondering when someone would post that pic
Avatar image for JordanizPro
JordanizPro

1912

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 JordanizPro
Member since 2009 • 1912 Posts
UC2. 'Nuff said.TheMoreYouOwn
Gears 3 > U2
Avatar image for deactivated-57ad0e5285d73
deactivated-57ad0e5285d73

21398

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 deactivated-57ad0e5285d73
Member since 2009 • 21398 Posts

It's hilarious that people think they have the exact same capabilities. To my knowledge the PS3 is of a different architecture, no?

Avatar image for deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab
deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab

17476

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#14 deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab
Member since 2008 • 17476 Posts
Blu-Ray.
Avatar image for Sword-Demon
Sword-Demon

7007

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#15 Sword-Demon
Member since 2008 • 7007 Posts
[QUOTE="TheMoreYouOwn"]UC2. 'Nuff said.JordanizPro
Gears 3 > U2

UC3>Gears3>UC2
Avatar image for TheMoreYouOwn
TheMoreYouOwn

3927

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 TheMoreYouOwn
Member since 2010 • 3927 Posts

[QUOTE="TheMoreYouOwn"]UC2. 'Nuff said.JordanizPro
Gears 3 > U2

U2? LOL! What...Marcus Fenix vs. Bono?

Avatar image for Sword-Demon
Sword-Demon

7007

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#17 Sword-Demon
Member since 2008 • 7007 Posts

It's hilarious that people think they have the exact same capabilities. To my knowledge the PS3 is of a different architecture, no?

Heirren
yes, they have very different architecture, but their capabilities are still roughly the same. just a different means to the same end
Avatar image for JordanizPro
JordanizPro

1912

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 JordanizPro
Member since 2009 • 1912 Posts
[QUOTE="JordanizPro"][QUOTE="TheMoreYouOwn"]UC2. 'Nuff said.Sword-Demon
Gears 3 > U2

UC3>Gears3>UC2

Crysis 2>UC3
Avatar image for Sword-Demon
Sword-Demon

7007

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#19 Sword-Demon
Member since 2008 • 7007 Posts
[QUOTE="Sword-Demon"][QUOTE="JordanizPro"] Gears 3 > U2 JordanizPro
UC3>Gears3>UC2

Crysis 2>UC3

Crysis>Crysis2 PC wins! :D
Avatar image for Shinobi120
Shinobi120

5728

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 Shinobi120
Member since 2004 • 5728 Posts

[QUOTE="garland51"]

If anything, the PS3 & the 360 have the exact same specs between each other. Only reason why 1st/2nd party games on the PS3 looked better than most games on the 360 was because that Sony's developers had more experience & talent in hardware than what MS does within their 1st/2nd party developers.

kuraimen

They don't have the same hardware so they can't have the same specs. A better way to phrase it is that they are basically equivalent in what they can do but there would always be some differences.

Thanks, that's what I meant to say there. :)

Blu-Ray.ferret-gamer

LOL...a different disc format can't exactly help you get more better graphics in games. Just more space.

Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33793 Posts

the xbox 360 has a better gpu, more vram, and can push more polygons

Kaszilla
Cell. The xbox and PS3 have the same ram they are just divided differently,unless you are talking about the 10 extra MB. If you see the xbox 360 specs it say 500 million,while the RSX move just 275 million,almost almost half,the problem with this is that raw specs basically mean nothing,the xbox 360 GPU has to handle all on the xbox 360 basically,while Cell help the RSX in a huge way by taking work load out of it,the result is simple. Since the Xenos has to do all the muscle flexing on 360,it raw power gos down way down,if you remember the xbox was say to push 125 million polygons but with effects it was more like 30 million,that is a huge drop,because once AI,physics,effects and all that stuff is implemented,the polygons on the 360 go down,i would say probably lower than 200 million. On the other hand Cell is handling anything from post processing effects,to AA,AI and many other stuff that other wise would cripple the RSX even more,so the RSX can do more while Cell take care of the rest,that make the RSX navigate closer to its full raw power in theory.
Avatar image for TheMoreYouOwn
TheMoreYouOwn

3927

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 TheMoreYouOwn
Member since 2010 • 3927 Posts

[QUOTE="JordanizPro"][QUOTE="Sword-Demon"] UC3>Gears3>UC2Sword-Demon
Crysis 2>UC3

Crysis>Crysis2 PC wins! :D

Vanquish>Crysis

Consoles win! :)

Avatar image for Snugenz
Snugenz

13388

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 Snugenz
Member since 2006 • 13388 Posts

[QUOTE="Kaszilla"]

the xbox 360 has a better gpu, more vram, and can push more polygons

tormentos

Cell. The xbox and PS3 have the same ram they are just divided differently,unless you are talking about the 10 extra MB. If you see the xbox 360 specs it say 500 million,while the RSX move just 275 million,almost almost half,the problem with this is that raw specs basically mean nothing,the xbox 360 GPU has to handle all on the xbox 360 basically,while Cell help the RSX in a huge way by taking work load out of it,the result is simple. Since the Xenos has to do all the muscle flexing on 360,it raw power gos down way down,if you remember the xbox was say to push 125 million polygons but with effects it was more like 30 million,that is a huge drop,because once AI,physics,effects and all that stuff is implemented,the polygons on the 360 go down,i would say probably lower than 200 million. On the other hand Cell is handling anything from post processing effects,to AA,AI and many other stuff that other wise would cripple the RSX even more,so the RSX can do more while Cell take care of the rest,that make the RSX navigate closer to its full raw power in theory.

You're forgetting the 360 GPU also has that 10mb of edram at its disposal, and that the 360 GPU has access to the full ammount of ram in the 360 which the RSX doesnt.

So there's more trade off's that you failed to mention.

Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33793 Posts
[QUOTE="TheMoreYouOwn"]UC2. 'Nuff said.JordanizPro
Gears 3 > U2

Na... And UC 3 >>>>Gears 3.
Avatar image for Sword-Demon
Sword-Demon

7007

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#25 Sword-Demon
Member since 2008 • 7007 Posts

[QUOTE="Sword-Demon"][QUOTE="JordanizPro"] Crysis 2>UC3TheMoreYouOwn

Crysis>Crysis2 PC wins! :D

Vanquish>Crysis

Consoles win! :)

9.5>9.0 what was that? :P
Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33793 Posts

[QUOTE="tormentos"][QUOTE="Kaszilla"]

the xbox 360 has a better gpu, more vram, and can push more polygons

Snugenz

Cell. The xbox and PS3 have the same ram they are just divided differently,unless you are talking about the 10 extra MB. If you see the xbox 360 specs it say 500 million,while the RSX move just 275 million,almost almost half,the problem with this is that raw specs basically mean nothing,the xbox 360 GPU has to handle all on the xbox 360 basically,while Cell help the RSX in a huge way by taking work load out of it,the result is simple. Since the Xenos has to do all the muscle flexing on 360,it raw power gos down way down,if you remember the xbox was say to push 125 million polygons but with effects it was more like 30 million,that is a huge drop,because once AI,physics,effects and all that stuff is implemented,the polygons on the 360 go down,i would say probably lower than 200 million. On the other hand Cell is handling anything from post processing effects,to AA,AI and many other stuff that other wise would cripple the RSX even more,so the RSX can do more while Cell take care of the rest,that make the RSX navigate closer to its full raw power in theory.

You're forgetting the 360 GPU also has that 10mb of edram at its disposal, and that the 360 GPU has access to the full ammount of ram in the 360 which the RSX doesnt.

So there's more trade off's that you failed to mention.

Actually i mention the 10 extra MB in my first line. But those extra 10 MB are not use for video,they are use for AA but they have a bottleneck which is the reason why some xbox 360 games don't even have AA,it was suppose to give the xbox 360 free 4XAA but it didn't because of Tiling,if i am not mistaken. If you just look the specs of the xbox 360 it should be giving much better looking games that the PS3,it doesn't because raw specs are just that one thing is theory and the other is practice.
Avatar image for deactivated-61cc564148ef4
deactivated-61cc564148ef4

10909

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#27 deactivated-61cc564148ef4
Member since 2007 • 10909 Posts

The cell.

Avatar image for Eurobox
Eurobox

28

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 Eurobox
Member since 2011 • 28 Posts

Proof is in the exclusives.

Avatar image for nameless12345
nameless12345

15125

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 nameless12345
Member since 2010 • 15125 Posts

It's CPU power is greater so it is more powerful. Genesis also had a stronger CPU than the SNES so it was more powerful although the SNES had a way better graphics processor and better sound chip.

Avatar image for megaspiderweb09
megaspiderweb09

3686

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#30 megaspiderweb09
Member since 2009 • 3686 Posts

Crysis2 looks cuter on PS3 than Xbox360

Avatar image for TH1Sx1SxSPARTA
TH1Sx1SxSPARTA

1852

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 TH1Sx1SxSPARTA
Member since 2011 • 1852 Posts
i cant believe these type of topics still exist
Avatar image for ZoomZoom2490
ZoomZoom2490

3943

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 ZoomZoom2490
Member since 2008 • 3943 Posts

ps3's cpu = 400gflops

360's cpu= 50gflops

both consoles have 512mb of ram

360's gpu has an edge but not that much.

so ps3's cpu+gpu > 360's cpu+gpu

Avatar image for KC_Hokie
KC_Hokie

16099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 KC_Hokie
Member since 2006 • 16099 Posts
Other than the CPU, which isn't even fully utilized on the PS3 due to the OS and system architecture, the Xbox 360 is actually a more powerful system.
Avatar image for FragTycoon
FragTycoon

6430

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 FragTycoon
Member since 2008 • 6430 Posts

[QUOTE="Kaszilla"]

the xbox 360 has a better gpu, more vram, and can push more polygons

tormentos

Cell. The xbox and PS3 have the same ram they are just divided differently,unless you are talking about the 10 extra MB. If you see the xbox 360 specs it say 500 million,while the RSX move just 275 million,almost almost half,the problem with this is that raw specs basically mean nothing,the xbox 360 GPU has to handle all on the xbox 360 basically,while Cell help the RSX in a huge way by taking work load out of it,the result is simple. Since the Xenos has to do all the muscle flexing on 360,it raw power gos down way down,if you remember the xbox was say to push 125 million polygons but with effects it was more like 30 million,that is a huge drop,because once AI,physics,effects and all that stuff is implemented,the polygons on the 360 go down,i would say probably lower than 200 million. On the other hand Cell is handling anything from post processing effects,to AA,AI and many other stuff that other wise would cripple the RSX even more,so the RSX can do more while Cell take care of the rest,that make the RSX navigate closer to its full raw power in theory.

Basically this (as simple as you can put it for SW peeps).

There is a generation of gamers who are conditioned to think GPU > Memory > CPU.. but as the PS3is proving very well that thea processor can take most of the burden.

I find it hilarious that people say "teh cell" like it's a joke and the cell is not powerful YET!have no other reason why the PS3 can do the graphics it can.

Avatar image for deactivated-57ad0e5285d73
deactivated-57ad0e5285d73

21398

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 deactivated-57ad0e5285d73
Member since 2009 • 21398 Posts

Just finished up a few matches of halo reach. Came back to this discussion just to check up. Good to see we have finally settled this debate and that we can all officially agree that the ps3 is the more capable machine, based on the FACTS that it has produced the best looking games this gen.

Avatar image for KC_Hokie
KC_Hokie

16099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 KC_Hokie
Member since 2006 • 16099 Posts

Just finished up a few matches of halo reach. Came back to this discussion just to check up. Good to see we have finally settled this debate and that we can all officially agree that the ps3 is the more capable machine, based on the FACTS that it has produced the best looking games this gen.

Heirren
Crysis 2 for the Xbox 360 is the best looking console game this generation. And I own both systems. So I have to disagree with you there.
Avatar image for Kan0nF0dder
Kan0nF0dder

1962

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 Kan0nF0dder
Member since 2009 • 1962 Posts
[QUOTE="Sword-Demon"][QUOTE="JordanizPro"] Gears 3 > U2 JordanizPro
UC3>Gears3>UC2

Crysis 2>UC3

No. UC3 isn't even out yet, but both Gears3 and UC3 look to be better than Crysis2, that game at times is a blurry mess.
Avatar image for PAL360
PAL360

30574

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 31

User Lists: 0

#38 PAL360
Member since 2007 • 30574 Posts

Proof is in the exclusives.

Eurobox

Indeed! Gears 3 and Forza 4 look incredible :P

Seriously, that excuse doesnt work anymore. At this point both consoles have shown equally good looking games.

Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#39 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

[QUOTE="Sword-Demon"][QUOTE="JordanizPro"] Crysis 2>UC3TheMoreYouOwn

Crysis>Crysis2 PC wins! :D

Vanquish>Crysis

Consoles win! :)

This is a joke right?

Avatar image for racing1750
racing1750

14567

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#40 racing1750
Member since 2010 • 14567 Posts

[QUOTE="JordanizPro"][QUOTE="TheMoreYouOwn"]UC2. 'Nuff said.Sword-Demon
Gears 3 > U2

UC3>Gears3>UC2

uc3 looks imo just like UC2.

Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33793 Posts
[QUOTE="Heirren"]

Just finished up a few matches of halo reach. Came back to this discussion just to check up. Good to see we have finally settled this debate and that we can all officially agree that the ps3 is the more capable machine, based on the FACTS that it has produced the best looking games this gen.

KC_Hokie
Crysis 2 for the Xbox 360 is the best looking console game this generation. And I own both systems. So I have to disagree with you there.

No is not and any reviewer who stated that is blind,Killzone 3 actually look better unless they were reviewing the PC version and mistake it for the 360 one.
Avatar image for KC_Hokie
KC_Hokie

16099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 KC_Hokie
Member since 2006 • 16099 Posts

[QUOTE="Sword-Demon"][QUOTE="JordanizPro"] Gears 3 > U2 racing1750

UC3>Gears3>UC2

uc3 looks imo just like UC2.

I agree. I wasn't that impressed graphically.
Avatar image for KC_Hokie
KC_Hokie

16099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 KC_Hokie
Member since 2006 • 16099 Posts
[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"][QUOTE="Heirren"]

Just finished up a few matches of halo reach. Came back to this discussion just to check up. Good to see we have finally settled this debate and that we can all officially agree that the ps3 is the more capable machine, based on the FACTS that it has produced the best looking games this gen.

tormentos
Crysis 2 for the Xbox 360 is the best looking console game this generation. And I own both systems. So I have to disagree with you there.

No is not and any reviewer who stated that is blind,Killzone 3 actually look better unless they were reviewing the PC version and mistake it for the 360 one.

A lot of reviewers stated Crysis 2 on the Xbox 360 was the best looking console game out. It's well documented.
Avatar image for TheMoreYouOwn
TheMoreYouOwn

3927

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 TheMoreYouOwn
Member since 2010 • 3927 Posts

[QUOTE="TheMoreYouOwn"]

[QUOTE="Sword-Demon"] Crysis>Crysis2 PC wins! :Dmitu123

Vanquish>Crysis

Consoles win! :)

This is a joke right?

Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#45 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

[QUOTE="TheMoreYouOwn"]

Vanquish>Crysis

Consoles win! :)

TheMoreYouOwn

This is a joke right?

Jelly of a worse game?

Avatar image for nameless12345
nameless12345

15125

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 nameless12345
Member since 2010 • 15125 Posts

[QUOTE="TheMoreYouOwn"]

[QUOTE="Sword-Demon"] Crysis>Crysis2 PC wins! :Dmitu123

Vanquish>Crysis

Consoles win! :)

This is a joke right?

He has a point. Vanquish is one of the best shooters this gen. But I wouldn't really compare the two since they are totaly different.

Avatar image for deactivated-57ad0e5285d73
deactivated-57ad0e5285d73

21398

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 deactivated-57ad0e5285d73
Member since 2009 • 21398 Posts

Just got back from playing Crysis 2 for 360. Quick question, the game is stuttering a lot when the action heats up. Is this normal, or is my 360 about to Red Ring?

Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#48 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

[QUOTE="TheMoreYouOwn"]

Vanquish>Crysis

Consoles win! :)

nameless12345

This is a joke right?

He has a point. Vanquish is one of the best shooters this gen. But I wouldn't really compare the two since they are totaly different.

It's not even better than Crysis 1 either way.

Avatar image for DerekLoffin
DerekLoffin

9095

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 47

User Lists: 0

#49 DerekLoffin
Member since 2002 • 9095 Posts
[QUOTE="tormentos"][QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]Crysis 2 for the Xbox 360 is the best looking console game this generation. And I own both systems. So I have to disagree with you there.KC_Hokie
No is not and any reviewer who stated that is blind,Killzone 3 actually look better unless they were reviewing the PC version and mistake it for the 360 one.

A lot of reviewers stated Crysis 2 on the Xbox 360 was the best looking console game out. It's well documented.

And a lot said it wasn't even one of the top looking console games, so? A few opinions one way or the other do not equate fact.
Avatar image for KC_Hokie
KC_Hokie

16099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 KC_Hokie
Member since 2006 • 16099 Posts
[QUOTE="KC_Hokie"][QUOTE="tormentos"]No is not and any reviewer who stated that is blind,Killzone 3 actually look better unless they were reviewing the PC version and mistake it for the 360 one.DerekLoffin
A lot of reviewers stated Crysis 2 on the Xbox 360 was the best looking console game out. It's well documented.

And a lot said it wasn't even one of the top looking console games, so? A few opinions one way or the other do not equate fact.

Considering 'best looking game' is purely subjective in the first place I would argue the game where the most reviewers stated the game is the best looking console game available is relevant to the discussion. And in that case it's Crysis 2 on the Xbox 360.