I find it quite odd how PS3 fanboys are bigger graphic **** than PC gamers.

You guys are still eating up that hype Sony gave years ago.

You guys are still eating up that hype Sony gave years ago.

peanutbudduh

PC hermits don't even care about graphics.

Hey what console currently has the better graphics?TintedEyes

TC you should blog it definetly. Vent your frustration.

[QUOTE="peanutbudduh"]

You guys are still eating up that hype Sony gave years ago.

Revan_911

Oh yeah, 120FPS with native 1080P resolution and textures... a bit hard to achieve that when you only got 256mb of gpu :P

I see TC is a very pissed off hermit and I see very pissed off cows coming to this thread.

[QUOTE="TintedEyes"]Hey what console currently has the better graphics?peanutbudduh

Just what we needed another graphics thread

[QUOTE="peanutbudduh"][QUOTE="TintedEyes"]Hey what console currently has the better graphics?FIipMode

[QUOTE="peanutbudduh"][QUOTE="TintedEyes"]Hey what console currently has the better graphics?FIipMode

^^ *looks at KZ2, U2, and GOW 3* yep...they delivered there promise of amazing graphics, though 120 fps, and native 1080p is "teh failz"

^^ *looks at KZ2, U2, and GOW 3* yep...they delivered there promise of amazing graphics

hamzah1235

KZ2, U2 and GOW3 are still far below what they promised to be standard of any game on the ps3 back in 2005

and lems dont do the same?sora16perfect

Well it's nice to see Devs are trying to push the PS3 to it's limits, can't help but get excitement in when we see something like GoW3, Ucharted2, and KZ2 ... these are amazing looking games that no one thought would be possible on the PS3 when the gen first started.

On top of that I can probably name every Hermit on this forum with one hand (exaggeration of course) so it's obvious why it seems like PS3 fanboys care more than Hermits.

[QUOTE="TintedEyes"]Hey what console currently has the better graphics?peanutbudduh

[QUOTE="Revan_911"][QUOTE="FIipMode"] Did they promise graphics better than PC or did they promise amazing graphics? Seems like Sony delivered to me.FIipMode

No, just no, there haven't been a single game that has EVER run at 120 FPS on a console, at ANY point during actual gameplay, let alone 1080P

I don't mind, just let them but I wonder how the many PS3 only owners with high end PCs think.

iagree especially since the xbox hadbetter graphics last gen and itdidnt really matter to them

[QUOTE="sora16perfect"]and lems dont do the same?FIipMode

[QUOTE="FIipMode"][QUOTE="Revan_911"] Do you actually know what they promised? You have no idea. DoomZaW

No, just no, there haven't been a single game that has EVER run at 120 FPS on a console, at ANY point during actual gameplay, let alone 1080P

Isn't Virtual Tennis 3 1080p lol?

And surely 120fps is pointless, when the human eye can't tell the difference?

[QUOTE="sora16perfect"]and lems dont do the same?FIipMode

[QUOTE="DoomZaW"]

[QUOTE="FIipMode"] Well this gen isn't over is it? So you can't say they failed on all their promises, but they did fulfill the 120 fps promise.Ravensmash

No, just no, there haven't been a single game that has EVER run at 120 FPS on a console, at ANY point during actual gameplay, let alone 1080P

Isn't Virtual Tennis 3 1080p lol?

And surely 120fps is pointless, when the human eye can't tell the difference?

probably yeah :P, just saying they have nowhere near delivered on the FPS promise. Nor the native 1080P in every game

[QUOTE="DoomZaW"]

[QUOTE="FIipMode"] Well this gen isn't over is it? So you can't say they failed on all their promises, but they did fulfill the 120 fps promise.Ravensmash

No, just no, there haven't been a single game that has EVER run at 120 FPS on a console, at ANY point during actual gameplay, let alone 1080P

Isn't Virtual Tennis 3 1080p lol?

And surely 120fps is pointless, when the human eye can't tell the difference?

[QUOTE="DoomZaW"]

[QUOTE="FIipMode"] Well this gen isn't over is it? So you can't say they failed on all their promises, but they did fulfill the 120 fps promise.Ravensmash

No, just no, there haven't been a single game that has EVER run at 120 FPS on a console, at ANY point during actual gameplay, let alone 1080P

Isn't Virtual Tennis 3 1080p lol?

And surely 120fps is pointless, when the human eye can't tell the difference?

No, just no, there haven't been a single game that has EVER run at 120 FPS on a console, at ANY point during actual gameplay, let alone 1080P

DoomZaW

funny how all xbox fanboys cared about last gen was graphics and now they pretend like they don't care...unless it's a multiplatform game that is still less impressively than PS3's best exclusive games.

Microsoft failed to produce toy story graphics on the orginal xbox like they promised yet I don't see you quoting old comments from them...also none of that changed the fact that xbox had the best over-all graphics last gen did it? Just like your comments don't change the fact that PS3 still has be best over all graphics for console this gen :)

[QUOTE="FIipMode"][QUOTE="Revan_911"] Do you actually know what they promised? You have no idea. DoomZaW

No, just no, there haven't been a single game that has EVER run at 120 FPS on a console, at ANY point during actual gameplay, let alone 1080P

[QUOTE="FIipMode"][QUOTE="sora16perfect"]and lems dont do the same?SilentlyMad

[QUOTE="Ravensmash"]

[QUOTE="DoomZaW"]

No, just no, there haven't been a single game that has EVER run at 120 FPS on a console, at ANY point during actual gameplay, let alone 1080P

ritz2

Isn't Virtual Tennis 3 1080p lol?

And surely 120fps is pointless, when the human eye can't tell the difference?

[QUOTE="DoomZaW"]

[QUOTE="FIipMode"] Well this gen isn't over is it? So you can't say they failed on all their promises, but they did fulfill the 120 fps promise.FIipMode

No, just no, there haven't been a single game that has EVER run at 120 FPS on a console, at ANY point during actual gameplay, let alone 1080P

Thats what I thought - the 3D one anyway.

probably yeah :P, just saying they have nowhere near delivered on the FPS promise. Nor the native 1080P in every game

DoomZaW

since you care so much about promises...

"One of the basic premises of the Xbox is to put the power in the hands of the artist," Blackley said, which is why Xbox developers "are achieving a level of visual detail you really get in 'Toy Story.'"

http://news.cnet.com/2100-1040-250632.html

Just like your comments don't change the fact that PS3 still has be best over all graphics for console this gen :)

playharderfool

how is that a fact? that's opinion. personally, i think RE5 is the best looking console game. because i said it, does it make it a fact? also, you seem to be bringing up graphics more than just about anyone else.

[QUOTE="FIipMode"][QUOTE="DoomZaW"]

No, just no, there haven't been a single game that has EVER run at 120 FPS on a console, at ANY point during actual gameplay, let alone 1080P

Nero_Paladin

Thats what I thought - the 3D one anyway.

[QUOTE="DoomZaW"]

No, just no, there haven't been a single game that has EVER run at 120 FPS on a console, at ANY point during actual gameplay, let alone 1080P

playharderfool

funny how all xbox fanboys cared about last gen was graphics and now they pretend like they don't care...unless it's a multiplatform game that is still less impressively than PS3's best exclusive games.

Microsoft failed to produce toy story graphics on the orginal xbox like they promised yet I don't see you quoting old comments from them...also none of that changed the fact that xbox had the best over-all graphics last gen did it? Just like your comments don't change the fact that PS3 still has be best over all graphics for console this gen :)

hmmm, maybe because i didn't know? ;) i wasn't really attending E3's back in 2002, primarily because i only was 10 years old at the time. And yes, it doesn't take a genius to realize the ps3 has the best graphics on consoles this gen, but still, saying they lived up to what they promised back in 2005 is quite exaggerated, and saying that "insert ps3 exclusive here" looks better than crysis has been seen all too many times here on the forums, it does support the theory that ps3 fanboys are quite the big graphic whores

[QUOTE="playharderfool"] Just like your comments don't change the fact that PS3 still has be best over all graphics for console this gen :)

clone01

how is that a fact? that's opinion. personally, i think RE5 is the best looking console game. because i said it, does it make it a fact? also, you seem to be bringing up graphics more than just about anyone else.

[QUOTE="DoomZaW"]

probably yeah :P, just saying they have nowhere near delivered on the FPS promise. Nor the native 1080P in every game

since you care so much about promises...

"One of the basic premises of the Xbox is to put the power in the hands of the artist," Blackley said, which is why Xbox developers "are achieving a level of visual detail you really get in 'Toy Story.'"

http://news.cnet.com/2100-1040-250632.html

Not its not opinion. You can measure detail therefore you can measure quality.

RadecSupreme

how, by comparing screenshots? i don't understand here. unless you're referring to technical screen resolution, graphics are subjective. if they weren't there wouldn't be 20 SW graphics threads a day.

I find it quite odd how 360 fanboys only use HALO and "weve got more people online so its BETTER" argument every time. (maybe ounce in a while they will pop out mass effect 2 or something)

TC you should blog it definetly. Vent your frustration.

Szminsky

I've done that, see the latest, the relief is only short term. You go back to the forums and have a Cow yell at you, because you dared to suggest PS3 should use its resources for more than just graphics.

Cows are at a point where they hear about Sony freeing up 70mb ram from the OS; and their first reactions is "woot more eye candy". I remind them that Vram is the graphics memory but they don't care, every spec of resources must priorities graphics.

[QUOTE="RadecSupreme"]Not its not opinion. You can measure detail therefore you can measure quality.

clone01

how, by comparing screenshots? i don't understand here. unless you're referring to technical screen resolution, graphics are subjective. if they weren't there wouldn't be 20 SW graphics threads a day.

Well it's nice to see Devs are trying to push the PS3 to it's limits, can't help but get excitement in when we see something like GoW3, Ucharted2, and KZ2 ... these are amazing looking games that no one thought would be possible on the PS3 when the gen first started.

On top of that I can probably name every Hermit on this forum with one hand (exaggeration of course) so it's obvious why it seems like PS3 fanboys care more than Hermits.

[QUOTE="Szminsky"]

TC you should blog it definetly. Vent your frustration.

AnnoyedDragon

I've done that, see the latest, the relief is only short term. You go back to the forums and have a Cow yell at you, because you dared to suggest PS3 should use its resources for more than just graphics.

Cows are at a point where they hear about Sony freeing up 70mb ram from the OS; and their first reactions is "woot more eye candy". I remind them that Vram is the graphics memory but they don't care, every spec of resources must priorities graphics.