I have no doubt in my mind that the PS3 will beat the 360, here is why..

  • 66 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for MotoZuki13
MotoZuki13

61

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 MotoZuki13
Member since 2007 • 61 Posts

this thread is about the long term run and not the short term as the 360 is beating the PS3 right now. I am no fanboy of any system but I will present my opinion of why the PS3 will win in the long run which could happen in one or two years.

The PS3 has over the 360:

1.Higher Resolutions support: the PS3 has HDMI 1.3 which supports upto 2560x1600 resolution vs what the 360 has which is HDMI 1.2 and that only supports 1080P. Also, the 1.3 supports 7.1 surround sound. I know what fanboys are going to say "we don't need it now...etc" Again, this argument I am making is for long term which I estimate will be a couple of years.

2.PS3 has Blu-Ray DVD format for its games. Regardless of how the Blu-Ray vs HD-DVD war goes, Sony will still support its console. Proof? PSP is the proof. UMD is still the format the PSP uses so I don't see any reason Sony will drop support for the blu-ray on the PS3. We all know what the 360 has, and it's arguable whether it could use more space as it still has some good lengthy games, and the DVD storage doesn't seem to affect it much, but I am pretty sure in the future they will need it as technology advances and more space is required. 1GB Ram on PC's these days is pretty standard or even 2GB. Heck, just a few years ago 512MB was an awesome amount of memory just to give you guys an example of how fast technology requirement changes. 2 hours of high definition video takes 22GB of space, so DVD will definitely become obsolete sometime as everything moves to HD.

3. PS3 has standard harddrive and it's easily upgradable. This is a big advantage for the PS3 as we see games like Uncharted have no loading times, plus the HDD is very easily upgradable and you don't have to buy it from Sony. Some of my friends have 250GB HDD's on their PS3's.

4. Sony allows for third parties to build accessories for the PS3. this isn't a big deal, but for all the racing fans like me, The Logitech G25 is simply untouchable vs what M$ offers for a racing wheel just to give you an example.

5. The Cell!!! Well, I could finally say the architecture of the PS3 is awesome. If it can give games like Uncharted, then you have nothing to say about it but good things. It will only get better from here. Only time will tell though, but it looks pretty promising right now for anybody who played and seen Uncharted.

6.To be fair, I think Sony should have put 1GB of memory in the PS3, so that would be one down side to it, but if it could produce games as good looking as Uncharted then I don't know, and I am sure Sony knew better than me, so I will just give this one some time to see what happens.

Now, you might be thinking why I am listing these things. Basically I am trying to say that the PS3 is a system that is built for a very long run. I believe that Sony will not release another system for at least another 8-9 years. Why do I think that? because it doesn't need to release one!!! See, Sony would not have released the PS3 as early as they did, but they were pressured by the competition and also were pressured by the need to release a system that supports the new leap in technology which is the HD format. The 360 is gonna become obsolete in a few years. that's because, we are going to see newer TV's role out with higher resolution than 1080P and standard 7.1 surround sound, and we are going to see games that take up as much as 30GB in space. Those leaps in Technology will make the 360 obsolete while the PS3 will support it easily!!! That would force M$ to release a new xbox. of course when that happens, M$ will drop all support for the 360 and concentrate on the new xbox to try to establish a new user base. At that time, the PS3 will be a well established system and the devs will be very comfortable programming for it and it will have a very large user base vs the newly released xbox. All of a sudden the scale is flipped, and you will see third party developers doing the same thing they are doing for the 360 right now unless of course M$ pays some big big big $$$ to do otherwise. They will drop support for xbox in favor of the PS3 which will be cheaper and probably easier to develop for at the time. How soon that time will come though is something that I don't know, but again technology goes fast. Anybody here is a Computer Engineer? Have you guys heard of Moore's law(if I recall the name right)?

So in short, because the PS3 is more advanced technologywise than the 360, it will beat it in the long run anyway, but that's not all. We don't even know how well the PS3 will do next year. It might even beat the 360 in user base just next year. Face the facts here. The 360 has already released all of its "big" titles. Everybody knows this. There is almost nothing coming for the 360 next year that has the same weight as Halo3 or GeoW except GeoW2 possibly, and NG2 (even this game is arguably is not as big as people want it to be). I can't even begin to list the insane games coming for the PS3 in 08, but MGS4, GT5, and possibly FF13 are very well established titles that will move systems without a doubt, and not to mention KillZone2, LBP and other titles. The PS3's sales lately have been more than the 360 worldwide and I believe that trend will continue and the gab between the two will even grow further as the big titles are near release.

The last point I am going to make is the multiplats. If Multiplats are going to move systems then it would go for the PS3. Who would want to spend money on a 360 when you could very possibly get RROD plus you get no value out of your system whatsoever unlike the PS3 which is one of the best buys for your buck out there.

I made this thread because I come to SW everyday, and I have been seeing some ridiculous fanboys make some seriously ridiculous threads about the "final nail in the coffin for the PS3", or "is the PS3 dead yet" or "the PS3 will die soon"....etc etc. These guys don't realize that the PS3 is just taking off!! Sit back and enjoy the ride!!!

Avatar image for sexy_chimp
sexy_chimp

6457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#2 sexy_chimp
Member since 2007 • 6457 Posts

For those who don't want to read it all, here is the translation:

Moo

:P

Avatar image for DaysAirlines
DaysAirlines

9537

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 DaysAirlines
Member since 2006 • 9537 Posts
I've seen enough movies to know that the underdog always wins. The PS3 will win the game, get the acceptance of his parents, and get the girl.
Avatar image for Synthetic_NinJI
Synthetic_NinJI

2809

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Synthetic_NinJI
Member since 2006 • 2809 Posts
No,just no.
Avatar image for Eltroz
Eltroz

5238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Eltroz
Member since 2007 • 5238 Posts

I agree with you. The 360 is the best console and PS3 is not even close.

Avatar image for RossRichard
RossRichard

3738

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 RossRichard
Member since 2007 • 3738 Posts

For those who don't want to read it all, here is the translation:

Moo

:P

sexy_chimp

I was going to say something similar, you beat me to it. I especially loved this line "I am no fanboy of any system" :lol: priceless

Avatar image for coolguy681
coolguy681

1353

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#7 coolguy681
Member since 2006 • 1353 Posts

this thread is about the long term run and not the short term as the 360 is beating the PS3 right now. I am no fanboy of any system but I will present my opinion of why the PS3 will win in the long run which could happen in one or two years.

The PS3 has over the 360:

1.Higher Resolutions support: the PS3 has HDMI 1.3 which supports upto 2560x1600 resolution vs what the 360 has which is HDMI 1.2 and that only supports 1080P. Also, the 1.3 supports 7.1 surround sound. I know what fanboys are going to say "we don't need it now...etc" Again, this argument I am making is for long term which I estimate will be a couple of years.

2.PS3 has Blu-Ray DVD format for its games. Regardless of how the Blu-Ray vs HD-DVD war goes, Sony will still support its console. Proof? PSP is the proof. UMD is still the format the PSP uses so I don't see any reason Sony will drop support for the blu-ray on the PS3. We all know what the 360 has, and it's arguable whether it could use more space as it still has some good lengthy games, and the DVD storage doesn't seem to affect it much, but I am pretty sure in the future they will need it as technology advances and more space is required. 1GB Ram on PC's these days is pretty standard or even 2GB. Heck, just a few years ago 512MB was an awesome amount of memory just to give you guys an example of how fast technology requirement changes. 2 hours of high definition video takes 22GB of space, so DVD will definitely become obsolete sometime as everything moves to HD.

3. PS3 has standard harddrive and it's easily upgradable. This is a big advantage for the PS3 as we see games like Uncharted have no loading times, plus the HDD is very easily upgradable and you don't have to buy it from Sony. Some of my friends have 250GB HDD's on their PS3's.

4. Sony allows for third parties to build accessories for the PS3. this isn't a big deal, but for all the racing fans like me, The Logitech G25 is simply untouchable vs what M$ offers for a racing wheel just to give you an example.

5. The Cell!!! Well, I could finally say the architecture of the PS3 is awesome. If it can give games like Uncharted, then you have nothing to say about it but good things. It will only get better from here. Only time will tell though, but it looks pretty promising right now for anybody who played and seen Uncharted.

6.To be fair, I think Sony should have put 1GB of memory in the PS3, so that would be one down side to it, but if it could produce games as good looking as Uncharted then I don't know, and I am sure Sony knew better than me, so I will just give this one some time to see what happens.

Now, you might be thinking why I am listing these things. Basically I am trying to say that the PS3 is a system that is built for a very long run. I believe that Sony will not release another system for at least another 8-9 years. Why do I think that? because it doesn't need to release one!!! See, Sony would not have released the PS3 as early as they did, but they were pressured by the competition and also were pressured by the need to release a system that supports the new leap in technology which is the HD format. The 360 is gonna become obsolete in a few years. that's because, we are going to see newer TV's role out with higher resolution than 1080P and standard 7.1 surround sound, and we are going to see games that take up as much as 30GB in space. Those leaps in Technology will make the 360 obsolete while the PS3 will support it easily!!! That would force M$ to release a new xbox. of course when that happens, M$ will drop all support for the 360 and concentrate on the new xbox to try to establish a new user base. At that time, the PS3 will be a well established system and the devs will be very comfortable programming for it and it will have a very large user base vs the newly released xbox. All of a sudden the scale is flipped, and you will see third party developers doing the same thing they are doing for the 360 right now unless of course M$ pays some big big big $$$ to do otherwise. They will drop support for xbox in favor of the PS3 which will be cheaper and probably easier to develop for at the time. How soon that time will come though is something that I don't know, but again technology goes fast. Anybody here is a Computer Engineer? Have you guys heard of Moore's law(if I recall the name right)?

So in short, because the PS3 is more advanced technologywise than the 360, it will beat it in the long run anyway, but that's not all. We don't even know how well the PS3 will do next year. It might even beat the 360 in user base just next year. Face the facts here. The 360 has already released all of its "big" titles. Everybody knows this. There is almost nothing coming for the 360 next year that has the same weight as Halo3 or GeoW except GeoW2 possibly, and NG2 (even this game is arguably is not as big as people want it to be). I can't even begin to list the insane games coming for the PS3 in 08, but MGS4, GT5, and possibly FF13 are very well established titles that will move systems without a doubt, and not to mention KillZone2, LBP and other titles. The PS3's sales lately have been more than the 360 worldwide and I believe that trend will continue and the gab between the two will even grow further as the big titles are near release.

The last point I am going to make is the multiplats. If Multiplats are going to move systems then it would go for the PS3. Who would want to spend money on a 360 when you could very possibly get RROD plus you get no value out of your system whatsoever unlike the PS3 which is one of the best buys for your buck out there.

I made this thread because I come to SW everyday, and I have been seeing some ridiculous fanboys make some seriously ridiculous threads about the "final nail in the coffin for the PS3", or "is the PS3 dead yet" or "the PS3 will die soon"....etc etc. These guys don't realize that the PS3 is just taking off!! Sit back and enjoy the ride!!!

MotoZuki13

AGREED!!!!

Avatar image for MetroidPrimePwn
MetroidPrimePwn

12399

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#8 MetroidPrimePwn
Member since 2007 • 12399 Posts
I agree, the 360 is an amazing console.
Avatar image for MotoZuki13
MotoZuki13

61

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 MotoZuki13
Member since 2007 • 61 Posts

No,just no.Synthetic_NinJI

Usually in the real world when you say "No", you would have to provide some logical expanation of why I am wrong.

Avatar image for sexy_chimp
sexy_chimp

6457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#10 sexy_chimp
Member since 2007 • 6457 Posts
No offense but most people won't take the time to read all that.
Avatar image for sexy_chimp
sexy_chimp

6457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#11 sexy_chimp
Member since 2007 • 6457 Posts

I agree, the 360 is an amazing console.MetroidPrimePwn

I agree, the 360 is an amazing console.

Avatar image for MotoZuki13
MotoZuki13

61

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 MotoZuki13
Member since 2007 • 61 Posts
For all the people that think I am a cow, I am not one. I am a hermit before I am a cow. My PC is Quad 4, 8800GT, 2GB memory, and currently playing GeoW.
Avatar image for RossRichard
RossRichard

3738

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 RossRichard
Member since 2007 • 3738 Posts

For all the people that think I am a cow, I am not one. I am a hermit before I am a cow. My PC is Quad 4, 8800GT, 2GB memory, and currently playing GeoW.MotoZuki13

And if it waddles like a cow and moos like a cow, well guess what.

Avatar image for Vorserider2
Vorserider2

202

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#14 Vorserider2
Member since 2007 • 202 Posts

I agree, the 360 is an amazing console.

Avatar image for jfkunrendered
jfkunrendered

8298

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#15 jfkunrendered
Member since 2005 • 8298 Posts
So we all agree then? 360 is an awesome console.
Avatar image for Nickman71
Nickman71

1002

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 Nickman71
Member since 2003 • 1002 Posts
I stopped reading after you said the 360 "only" supports 1080p.
Avatar image for Synthetic_NinJI
Synthetic_NinJI

2809

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 Synthetic_NinJI
Member since 2006 • 2809 Posts
360 is an amazing console, couldnt say it better myself.
Avatar image for nyoroism
nyoroism

3778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 nyoroism
Member since 2007 • 3778 Posts
Isn't it weird how the smallest paragraph in all of that is the only one that mentions games?
Avatar image for MotoRacer81
MotoRacer81

720

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 MotoRacer81
Member since 2007 • 720 Posts
is this place a joke?? can anybody even provide any refutation to what the guy is saying!!is this place filled with stupid fanboys that dont' like any logical arguements or what?
Avatar image for Pajamasalad
Pajamasalad

356

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 Pajamasalad
Member since 2007 • 356 Posts
Do you think your fooling anyone when you say you arn't a Cow?
Avatar image for MotoZuki13
MotoZuki13

61

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 MotoZuki13
Member since 2007 • 61 Posts

Do you think your fooling anyone when you say you arn't a Cow?Pajamasalad

I do own a PS3, but I also own an awesome PC, I never said I didn't own a PS3.

Avatar image for jimm895
jimm895

7703

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 jimm895
Member since 2007 • 7703 Posts
[QUOTE="MotoZuki13"]

this thread is about the long term run and not the short term as the 360 is beating the PS3 right now. I am no fanboy of any system but I will present my opinion of why the PS3 will win in the long run which could happen in one or two years.

The PS3 has over the 360:

1.Higher Resolutions support: the PS3 has HDMI 1.3 which supports upto 2560x1600 resolution vs what the 360 has which is HDMI 1.2 and that only supports 1080P. Also, the 1.3 supports 7.1 surround sound. I know what fanboys are going to say "we don't need it now...etc" Again, this argument I am making is for long term which I estimate will be a couple of years.

2.PS3 has Blu-Ray DVD format for its games. Regardless of how the Blu-Ray vs HD-DVD war goes, Sony will still support its console. Proof? PSP is the proof. UMD is still the format the PSP uses so I don't see any reason Sony will drop support for the blu-ray on the PS3. We all know what the 360 has, and it's arguable whether it could use more space as it still has some good lengthy games, and the DVD storage doesn't seem to affect it much, but I am pretty sure in the future they will need it as technology advances and more space is required. 1GB Ram on PC's these days is pretty standard or even 2GB. Heck, just a few years ago 512MB was an awesome amount of memory just to give you guys an example of how fast technology requirement changes. 2 hours of high definition video takes 22GB of space, so DVD will definitely become obsolete sometime as everything moves to HD.

3. PS3 has standard harddrive and it's easily upgradable. This is a big advantage for the PS3 as we see games like Uncharted have no loading times, plus the HDD is very easily upgradable and you don't have to buy it from Sony. Some of my friends have 250GB HDD's on their PS3's.

4. Sony allows for third parties to build accessories for the PS3. this isn't a big deal, but for all the racing fans like me, The Logitech G25 is simply untouchable vs what M$ offers for a racing wheel just to give you an example.

5. The Cell!!! Well, I could finally say the architecture of the PS3 is awesome. If it can give games like Uncharted, then you have nothing to say about it but good things. It will only get better from here. Only time will tell though, but it looks pretty promising right now for anybody who played and seen Uncharted.

6.To be fair, I think Sony should have put 1GB of memory in the PS3, so that would be one down side to it, but if it could produce games as good looking as Uncharted then I don't know, and I am sure Sony knew better than me, so I will just give this one some time to see what happens.

Now, you might be thinking why I am listing these things. Basically I am trying to say that the PS3 is a system that is built for a very long run. I believe that Sony will not release another system for at least another 8-9 years. Why do I think that? because it doesn't need to release one!!! See, Sony would not have released the PS3 as early as they did, but they were pressured by the competition and also were pressured by the need to release a system that supports the new leap in technology which is the HD format. The 360 is gonna become obsolete in a few years. that's because, we are going to see newer TV's role out with higher resolution than 1080P and standard 7.1 surround sound, and we are going to see games that take up as much as 30GB in space. Those leaps in Technology will make the 360 obsolete while the PS3 will support it easily!!! That would force M$ to release a new xbox. of course when that happens, M$ will drop all support for the 360 and concentrate on the new xbox to try to establish a new user base. At that time, the PS3 will be a well established system and the devs will be very comfortable programming for it and it will have a very large user base vs the newly released xbox. All of a sudden the scale is flipped, and you will see third party developers doing the same thing they are doing for the 360 right now unless of course M$ pays some big big big $$$ to do otherwise. They will drop support for xbox in favor of the PS3 which will be cheaper and probably easier to develop for at the time. How soon that time will come though is something that I don't know, but again technology goes fast. Anybody here is a Computer Engineer? Have you guys heard of Moore's law(if I recall the name right)?

So in short, because the PS3 is more advanced technologywise than the 360, it will beat it in the long run anyway, but that's not all. We don't even know how well the PS3 will do next year. It might even beat the 360 in user base just next year. Face the facts here. The 360 has already released all of its "big" titles. Everybody knows this. There is almost nothing coming for the 360 next year that has the same weight as Halo3 or GeoW except GeoW2 possibly, and NG2 (even this game is arguably is not as big as people want it to be). I can't even begin to list the insane games coming for the PS3 in 08, but MGS4, GT5, and possibly FF13 are very well established titles that will move systems without a doubt, and not to mention KillZone2, LBP and other titles. The PS3's sales lately have been more than the 360 worldwide and I believe that trend will continue and the gab between the two will even grow further as the big titles are near release.

The last point I am going to make is the multiplats. If Multiplats are going to move systems then it would go for the PS3. Who would want to spend money on a 360 when you could very possibly get RROD plus you get no value out of your system whatsoever unlike the PS3 which is one of the best buys for your buck out there.

I made this thread because I come to SW everyday, and I have been seeing some ridiculous fanboys make some seriously ridiculous threads about the "final nail in the coffin for the PS3", or "is the PS3 dead yet" or "the PS3 will die soon"....etc etc. These guys don't realize that the PS3 is just taking off!! Sit back and enjoy the ride!!!

coolguy681

AGREED!!!!

I also agree with the TC.

Avatar image for Eltroz
Eltroz

5238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 Eltroz
Member since 2007 • 5238 Posts
I think it was great of the TC to write such a long post saying how much he loves the 360 and thinks it is the best console. I agree the 360 is great.
Avatar image for MotoZuki13
MotoZuki13

61

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 MotoZuki13
Member since 2007 • 61 Posts

I think it was great of the TC to write such a long post saying how much he loves the 360 and thinks it is the best console. I agree the 360 is great.Eltroz

Yeah, I said I am no fanboy. You would only be an idiot if you said the 360 does not have any great games. It does, and it has a better library than the PS3 right now, but it won't be long before the PS3 makes it a come back to beat it. 360 is winning the battle, but the PS3 will win the war.

Avatar image for dipper145
dipper145

1425

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#25 dipper145
Member since 2007 • 1425 Posts

I agree with the TC the 360 is way better then the ps3. lol "THE CELL"!! the architecutre is great! lol. harddrive and bluraY? your joking right?

Avatar image for Eltroz
Eltroz

5238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 Eltroz
Member since 2007 • 5238 Posts

[QUOTE="Eltroz"]I think it was great of the TC to write such a long post saying how much he loves the 360 and thinks it is the best console. I agree the 360 is great.MotoZuki13

Yeah, I said I am no fanboy. You would only be an idiot if you said the 360 does not have any great games. It does, and it has a better library than the PS3 right now, but it won't be long before the PS3 makes it a come back to beat it. 360 is winning the battle, but the PS3 will win the war.

No,I am agreeing with you that the 360 will win the console race and is a great system.
Avatar image for LessThanMarcus
LessThanMarcus

655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 LessThanMarcus
Member since 2003 • 655 Posts
I have a 360 and PS3. Play both of them equally. But something about the PS3 makes it stand out. Can't quite pin point it but the console and interface is so damn badasss. Possibilities with this system are endless, media and gaming wise. And I'm having a great time right now playing PAIN. F YEAH. you 360 owners are missing out. buy a PS3 now and pick up Uncharted and Warhawk. stop being a fanboy. you know you want to play little big planet, home, and MGS4 anyway
Avatar image for MotoZuki13
MotoZuki13

61

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 MotoZuki13
Member since 2007 • 61 Posts

I agree with the TC the 360 is way better then the ps3. lol "THE CELL"!! the architecutre is great! lol. harddrive and bluraY? your joking right?

dipper145

The cell is being used to replace super computers in certain cases. what do you have against it? I am not joking, I am serious. You are one of the people that make this site so stupid sometimes. What argument are you actually presenting? Give me just one. what do you have against anything I said. This is now page 2 and the 360 fans have yet to produce one single argument against any of mine. Come on guys, where are the defenders. You take one line in my post and ignore everything else. Sometimes I tend to think that there area lot of children on this site that can't produce any arguments than "PS3 fails", and "PS3 has no games"....etc.

Avatar image for MotoZuki13
MotoZuki13

61

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 MotoZuki13
Member since 2007 • 61 Posts
[QUOTE="MotoZuki13"]

[QUOTE="Eltroz"]I think it was great of the TC to write such a long post saying how much he loves the 360 and thinks it is the best console. I agree the 360 is great.Eltroz

Yeah, I said I am no fanboy. You would only be an idiot if you said the 360 does not have any great games. It does, and it has a better library than the PS3 right now, but it won't be long before the PS3 makes it a come back to beat it. 360 is winning the battle, but the PS3 will win the war.

No,I am agreeing with you that the 360 will win the console race and is a great system.

:lol: you do make me laugh.Did you even read the title? lol

Avatar image for Falcon4AF_Ace
Falcon4AF_Ace

110

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 Falcon4AF_Ace
Member since 2007 • 110 Posts

[QUOTE="MetroidPrimePwn"]I agree, the 360 is an amazing console.sexy_chimp

I agree, the 360 is an amazing console.

I agree, the 360 is an amazing console.

Avatar image for Pajamasalad
Pajamasalad

356

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 Pajamasalad
Member since 2007 • 356 Posts

Pretending the Playstation 3 can last 8-9 years is crazy. You can't know that for sure. The power gap between the PS3 and the 360 is SMALLER then the power gap last gen between the Xbox and the PS2. Xbox is outdated looking back on it why would PS3 be so different?

You really underestimate Microsoft if you think they don't have any tricks up their sleeves. If they considered the recent price drop to be a threat I am sure they would drop the price on the 360 but they didn't. They would be able to lower their price alot safer than Sony could. If you think Microsoft is going to sit there and do nothing if Sony ever catches up to them then prepared to be dissapointed.

Avatar image for MotoRacer81
MotoRacer81

720

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 MotoRacer81
Member since 2007 • 720 Posts
[QUOTE="sexy_chimp"]

[QUOTE="MetroidPrimePwn"]I agree, the 360 is an amazing console.Falcon4AF_Ace

I agree, the 360 is an amazing console.

I agree, the 360 is an amazing console.

Please don't start this crap

Avatar image for LessThanMarcus
LessThanMarcus

655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 LessThanMarcus
Member since 2003 • 655 Posts
[QUOTE="sexy_chimp"]

[QUOTE="MetroidPrimePwn"]I agree, the 360 is an amazing console.Falcon4AF_Ace

I agree, the 360 is an amazing console.

I agree, the 360 is an amazing console.

I agree, the 360 is a great console. But so is the PS3.

Avatar image for blarhg
blarhg

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 blarhg
Member since 2006 • 25 Posts

My thread was better

tbqh imo

Avatar image for Eltroz
Eltroz

5238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 Eltroz
Member since 2007 • 5238 Posts
[QUOTE="Eltroz"][QUOTE="MotoZuki13"]

[QUOTE="Eltroz"]I think it was great of the TC to write such a long post saying how much he loves the 360 and thinks it is the best console. I agree the 360 is great.MotoZuki13

Yeah, I said I am no fanboy. You would only be an idiot if you said the 360 does not have any great games. It does, and it has a better library than the PS3 right now, but it won't be long before the PS3 makes it a come back to beat it. 360 is winning the battle, but the PS3 will win the war.

No,I am agreeing with you that the 360 will win the console race and is a great system.

:lol: you do make me laugh.Did you even read the title? lol

Ya it was awsome. Listen though cows already know they will come in last but no need to rub their noses in it. I am glad you agree though that 360 will win this console gen no problem.
Avatar image for MotoZuki13
MotoZuki13

61

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 MotoZuki13
Member since 2007 • 61 Posts

Pretending the Playstation 3 can last 8-9 years is crazy. You can't know that for sure. The power gap between the PS3 and the 360 is SMALLER then the power gap last gen between the Xbox and the PS2. Xbox is outdated looking back on it why would PS3 be so different?

You really underestimate Microsoft if you think they don't have any tricks up their sleeves. If they considered the recent price drop to be a threat I am sure they would drop the price on the 360 but they didn't. They would be able to lower their price alot safer than Sony could. If you think Microsoft is going to sit there and do nothing if Sony ever catches up to them then prepared to be dissapointed.

Pajamasalad

they are almost equal in power, Yes. but it's not just the processing power or the graphics that is going to make the difference (even though the PS3 definitely has more potential and we truly don't know what it could produce, but right now they are about equal with slight edge to the PS3). it's the features of the console that will make the difference here. DVD will be outdates sooner than you think, and 1080P TV's will be just like the 720P right now (stafcked in Walmart and cheap as dirt). New technologies demands will put an end to the 360 where it won't to the PS3. The PS3 can handle more years of technology than the 360 can. In a few years the 360 could become obsolete and it will happen.

Avatar image for jimm895
jimm895

7703

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 jimm895
Member since 2007 • 7703 Posts
[QUOTE="dipper145"]

I agree with the TC the 360 is way better then the ps3. lol "THE CELL"!! the architecutre is great! lol. harddrive and bluraY? your joking right?

MotoZuki13

The cell is being used to replace super computers in certain cases. what do you have against it? I am not joking, I am serious. You are one of the people that make this site so stupid sometimes. What argument are you actually presenting? Give me just one. what do you have against anything I said. This is now page 2 and the 360 fans have yet to produce one single argument against any of mine. Come on guys, where are the defenders. You take one line in my post and ignore everything else. Sometimes I tend to think that there area lot of children on this site that can't produce any arguments than "PS3 fails", and "PS3 has no games"....etc.

I think some of us can see what happening in the real world and yet so many are blinded by any kind of hype. I was seeing a lot of power in the PS3 before it was ever released by reading articles on the specs. that was being incorporated in the system. I wonder what kind of argument they will have around the middle of next year.

Avatar image for knufsed
knufsed

1073

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 knufsed
Member since 2005 • 1073 Posts

Dear TC,

Lemmings are pretty much childish fanboys. Not anyone of them are even offering any kind of decent, intelligent rebuttal. They're just slinging around all thier silly little cliche's. It's really sad, really. They have nothing relevant to say, and no meaniful defense. Meanwhile they are all wrapping towels around thier xbox 360s trying to avoid sending their xbox back to Microsoft.

They are a joke.

I'm sorry to say, you are wasting your time on this board if you want to intelligently debate over consoles.

Avatar image for Falcon4AF_Ace
Falcon4AF_Ace

110

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 Falcon4AF_Ace
Member since 2007 • 110 Posts

Dear TC,

Lemmings are pretty much childish fanboys. Not anyone of them are even offering any kind of decent, intelligent rebuttal. They're just slinging around all thier silly little cliche's. It's really sad, really. They have nothing relevant to say, and no meaniful defense. Meanwhile they are all wrapping towels around thier xbox 360s trying to avoid sending their xbox back to Microsoft.

They are a joke.

I'm sorry to say, you are wasting your time on this board if you want to intelligently debate over consoles.

knufsed

I agree, the 360 is an amazing console.

Avatar image for MotoRacer81
MotoRacer81

720

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 MotoRacer81
Member since 2007 • 720 Posts
[QUOTE="knufsed"]

Dear TC,

Lemmings are pretty much childish fanboys. Not anyone of them are even offering any kind of decent, intelligent rebuttal. They're just slinging around all thier silly little cliche's. It's really sad, really. They have nothing relevant to say, and no meaniful defense. Meanwhile they are all wrapping towels around thier xbox 360s trying to avoid sending their xbox back to Microsoft.

They are a joke.

I'm sorry to say, you are wasting your time on this board if you want to intelligently debate over consoles.

Falcon4AF_Ace

I agree, the 360 is an amazing console.

Dear TC,

Lemmings are pretty much childish fanboys. Not anyone of them are even offering any kind of decent, intelligent rebuttal. They're just slinging around all thier silly little cliche's. It's really sad, really. They have nothing relevant to say, and no meaniful defense. Meanwhile they are all wrapping towels around thier xbox 360s trying to avoid sending their xbox back to Microsoft.

They are a joke.

I'm sorry to say, you are wasting your time on this board if you want to intelligently debate over consoles.

knufsed

Look at the response right below yours. It just goes to prove your point even further. TC is calling out the 360 fans with some logic and allhe gets is a bunch of garbage, lol, you're right.

Avatar image for jamesns
jamesns

334

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 jamesns
Member since 2007 • 334 Posts

Dear TC,

Lemmings are pretty much childish fanboys. Not anyone of them are even offering any kind of decent, intelligent rebuttal. They're just slinging around all thier silly little cliche's. It's really sad, really. They have nothing relevant to say, and no meaniful defense. Meanwhile they are all wrapping towels around thier xbox 360s trying to avoid sending their xbox back to Microsoft.

They are a joke.

I'm sorry to say, you are wasting your time on this board if you want to intelligently debate over consoles.

knufsed

He's right, ive tried many many times..

Avatar image for GanonBuRAP
GanonBuRAP

1463

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#42 GanonBuRAP
Member since 2007 • 1463 Posts

...wth are you lems doing...you're making us look bad. tc provided some extremely valid points about the longevity of the PS3, so respect it. sheesh you guys are a joke.

tc, your post is pretty bullet proof, ownage confirmed, but my only gripe is that you barely mentioned games, which is basically what it boils down to. I'm getting360 over a PS3 this christmas becase Gears, Halo 3, Mass Effect pretty well beat out anything the PS3 can currently dish out. Also, 360 '08 is full of RPGs like Fable 2 and Lost Odyssy...

regardless, very nice post, and I agree with you for most of it. but it doesn't really matter, because interms of a gaming system, 360 currently has it in the bag.

Avatar image for stray720
stray720

172

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#43 stray720
Member since 2004 • 172 Posts
[QUOTE="knufsed"]

Dear TC,

Lemmings are pretty much childish fanboys. Not anyone of them are even offering any kind of decent, intelligent rebuttal. They're just slinging around all thier silly little cliche's. It's really sad, really. They have nothing relevant to say, and no meaniful defense. Meanwhile they are all wrapping towels around thier xbox 360s trying to avoid sending their xbox back to Microsoft.

They are a joke.

I'm sorry to say, you are wasting your time on this board if you want to intelligently debate over consoles.

jamesns

He's right, ive tried many many times..

It's sad, really. I was a big 360 proponent at one point but I took a chance on PS3. I've had way more fun on it than I'd been having on 360. So it goes on SW.

Avatar image for rymill2
rymill2

163

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 rymill2
Member since 2003 • 163 Posts

ps2 won last gen with the worst hardware, ps1 won the previous gen with the worst hardware, trend?

........ u phail, go find something more productive to do, like biting a pillow or something along those lines

Avatar image for KodiakGTS
KodiakGTS

1262

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#45 KodiakGTS
Member since 2003 • 1262 Posts

this thread is about the long term run and not the short term as the 360 is beating the PS3 right now. I am no fanboy of any system but I will present my opinion of why the PS3 will win in the long run which could happen in one or two years.

The PS3 has over the 360:

1.Higher Resolutions support: the PS3 has HDMI 1.3 which supports upto 2560x1600 resolution vs what the 360 has which is HDMI 1.2 and that only supports 1080P. Also, the 1.3 supports 7.1 surround sound. I know what fanboys are going to say "we don't need it now...etc" Again, this argument I am making is for long term which I estimate will be a couple of years.

Neither of these are a real advantage in mass market scenarios. Givenhow small the currentpenetration rate of 1080p TV's is and how slowly that rate is increasing, there is no real reason to support a higher resolution for this consolegeneration. 7.1 may be an advantage that more people will experience, but again, the average joe probably doesn't have a decent enough 7.1 system for it to make a difference.

2.PS3 has Blu-Ray DVD format for its games. Regardless of how the Blu-Ray vs HD-DVD war goes, Sony will still support its console. Proof? PSP is the proof. UMD is still the format the PSP uses so I don't see any reason Sony will drop support for the blu-ray on the PS3. We all know what the 360 has, and it's arguable whether it could use more space as it still has some good lengthy games, and the DVD storage doesn't seem to affect it much, but I am pretty sure in the future they will need it as technology advances and more space is required. 1GB Ram on PC's these days is pretty standard or even 2GB. Heck, just a few years ago 512MB was an awesome amount of memory just to give you guys an example of how fast technology requirement changes. 2 hours of high definition video takes 22GB of space, so DVD will definitely become obsolete sometime as everything moves to HD.

For starters, your comparison to RAM is completetly off base. Increasing RAM only increases the speed at which processes run (not even all processes, just those with memory requirements larger than your processor's cache), not the actual amount of content which can be included.Also, from what I've seen, developers seem to bemoving towards morereal-time rendered cutscenes, instead of piling hours and hours of HD video onto disks,so IMO the space problem will gradually become a non-issue.

3. PS3 has standard harddrive and it's easily upgradable. This is a big advantage for the PS3 as we see games like Uncharted have no loading times, plus the HDD is very easily upgradable and you don't have to buy it from Sony. Some of my friends have 250GB HDD's on their PS3's.

The only reason excessive HD caching (as in Oblivion and other games on PS3) is a necessity is because of the slow read time of BR discs. Even given this advantage, how practical is it? Say games do eventually become 30 or 40 GB behemoths like you are proposing. These games will require even morecaching than before, forcing people to buy an extra hard drive just so they have enough room for everything else

4. Sony allows for third parties to build accessories for the PS3. this isn't a big deal, but for all the racing fans like me, The Logitech G25 is simply untouchable vs what M$ offers for a racing wheel just to give you an example.

Not being a racing fan or owning the X360 racing wheel I can't really argue this point.

5. The Cell!!! Well, I could finally say the architecture of the PS3 is awesome. If it can give games like Uncharted, then you have nothing to say about it but good things. It will only get better from here. Only time will tell though, but it looks pretty promising right now for anybody who played and seen Uncharted.

Yes the Cell is impressive from a computing standpoint, but that does not necessarily translate into more impressive games. Programming for even two or three cored processors can be difficult, and many developers are finding the PS3's architecture difficult to work with (at least several have made statements about this which have been posted on this forum).

6.To be fair, I think Sony should have put 1GB of memory in the PS3, so that would be one down side to it, but if it could produce games as good looking as Uncharted then I don't know, and I am sure Sony knew better than me, so I will just give this one some time to see what happens.

How is this a Pro? Those well versed in computer architecture would tell you that the lack of enough memory is a major oversight. This may well be a limiting factor in how much onscreen content can be displayed at once, and how detailed said content can be.Developers will have a hard time keeping consistent performance if cache/memory capacity becomes an issue, forcing themto retrieve excess datafrom the hard disk or BR disk more often.

Now, you might be thinking why I am listing these things. Basically I am trying to say that the PS3 is a system that is built for a very long run. I believe that Sony will not release another system for at least another 8-9 years. Why do I think that? because it doesn't need to release one!!!

I hope that last statement was a joke. Sure PS3 has some power under the hood, but enough to stay competitive for 8 - 9 more years? Do you even remember what you were playing 9 years ago? The original Half-Lifehad just been released. Try comparing HL to Crysis. That is the graphical gap that will exist between PS3 and newer platforms in9 years time.

See, Sony would not have released the PS3 as early as they did, but they were pressured by the competition and also were pressured by the need to release a system that supports the new leap in technology which is the HD format. The 360 is gonna become obsolete in a few years. that's because, we are going to see newer TV's role out with higher resolution than 1080P and standard 7.1 surround sound, and we are going to see games that take up as much as 30GB in space. Those leaps in Technology will make the 360 obsolete while the PS3 will support it easily!!! That would force M$ to release a new xbox. of course when that happens, M$ will drop all support for the 360 and concentrate on the new xbox to try to establish a new user base. At that time, the PS3 will be a well established system and the devs will be very comfortable programming for it and it will have a very large user base vs the newly released xbox. All of a sudden the scale is flipped, and you will see third party developers doing the same thing they are doing for the 360 right now unless of course M$ pays some big big big $$$ to do otherwise. They will drop support for xbox in favor of the PS3 which will be cheaper and probably easier to develop for at the time. How soon that time will come though is something that I don't know, but again technology goes fast. Anybody here is a Computer Engineer? Have you guys heard of Moore's law(if I recall the name right)?

Please, don't try quoting Moore's law. That is an ideal, not a practical statement that will hold true forever. Sure we can jam more transistors on a chip, but that does not ensure speed. That sort of "more is better" attitude led to things like the 32-stage pipeline found in the Pentium IV, which yeah, looks great on paper, but is easily outperformed by processors running multiple cores with far shorter pipes.

So in short, because the PS3 is more advanced technologywise than the 360, it will beat it in the long run anyway, but that's not all. We don't even know how well the PS3 will do next year. It might even beat the 360 in user base just next year. Face the facts here. The 360 has already released all of its "big" titles. Everybody knows this. There is almost nothing coming for the 360 next year that has the same weight as Halo3 or GeoW except GeoW2 possibly, and NG2 (even this game is arguably is not as big as people want it to be). I can't even begin to list the insane games coming for the PS3 in 08, but MGS4, GT5, and possibly FF13 are very well established titles that will move systems without a doubt, and not to mention KillZone2, LBP and other titles. The PS3's sales lately have been more than the 360 worldwide(source?)and I believe that trend will continue and the gab between the two will even grow further as the big titles are near release.

The last point I am going to make is the multiplats. If Multiplats are going to move systems then it would go for the PS3. Who would want to spend money on a 360 when you could very possibly get RROD plus you get no value out of your system whatsoever unlike the PS3 which is one of the best buys for your buck out there.

The paragraph above is nothing but fanboy drivel. Yes RROD has been a problem for the X360, but saying that you get no value out of your system is downright lying. I've been enjoying dozens of wonderful games for X360 while all PS3 fanboys can do is scrape by with a handful of truly good titles and wait.

I made this thread because I come to SW everyday, and I have been seeing some ridiculous fanboys make some seriously ridiculous threads about the "final nail in the coffin for the PS3", or "is the PS3 dead yet" or "the PS3 will die soon"....etc etc. These guys don't realize that the PS3 is just taking off!! Sit back and enjoy the ride!!!

MotoZuki13
Avatar image for stray720
stray720

172

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#46 stray720
Member since 2004 • 172 Posts
[QUOTE="MotoZuki13"]

The last point I am going to make is the multiplats. If Multiplats are going to move systems then it would go for the PS3. Who would want to spend money on a 360 when you could very possibly get RROD plus you get no value out of your system whatsoever unlike the PS3 which is one of the best buys for your buck out there.KodiakGTS


The paragraph above is nothing but fanboy drivel. Yes RROD has been a problem for the X360, but saying that you get no value out of your system is downright lying. I've been enjoying dozens of wonderful games for X360 while all PS3 fanboys can do is scrape by with a handful of truly good titles and wait.



o_O I thought I was on Gamespot not ars.technica or something. Too bad you had to end it with fanboy drivel. Regardless, IIRC seek time is faster on Blu-ray than 12x DVD. Although the PS3 BD-ROM is designed to be quiet, not a speed demon. 360 devs don't have the luxury of taking cache into consideration though, they have to design for the lowest common denominator (core/arcade).

Also, there aren't many TV manufacturers pushing 720/768p sets except for in the 32"andlower LCD category. And plasmas but that's a different story. In 6 months once the existing 720p stock is gone you're going to be hard pressed to find an LCD or DLP that isn't 1080p.

I don't think the PS3 is going to last 10 years, but in the PS3 I think Sony's developed a solid platform that will lend itself to a pretty simple redesign for the PS4 assuming the cell and blu-ray prove successful. I mean, honestly, I could see them doing what Nintendo did from GC to Wii and re-using a faster cell, coupled with more memory and a faster system bus. And obviously a gfx chip update.
Avatar image for DA_B0MB
DA_B0MB

9938

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 DA_B0MB
Member since 2005 • 9938 Posts

I have all three consoles. Putting it simply, just because my PS3 reads Blu-ray discs, has "teh cell", an RSX reality synthisizer, tilt functionality, and a standard hard drive does not mean it has better games at all. Breaking down the time I play all my consoles:

XBOX 360: 95%

PS3: 3%

Wii: 2%

I'd probably play Wii a lot more if I had SMG though. UT3 could boost PS3 play time as well but the 360 is still dominant over both for me.

Avatar image for grimhope
grimhope

978

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#48 grimhope
Member since 2003 • 978 Posts

Causuals dont care about ANY of the reasons that you listed, and casuals in the end buy the most consoles, so you're theory is severly flawed.

Last xbox had better grafix and a unified harddrive, did that help it?

Avatar image for carsales
carsales

1143

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 carsales
Member since 2006 • 1143 Posts
I have both and the ps3 in it's one year has done nothing to impress me. I like playing blu ray movies. The 360 is simply better. better games, better graphics, better online, better controll, better price,and better multiplats. Its just better. All my 360 games are 1080p and most of the ps3 games are 720p. 1080p>720p. 360>ps3.
Avatar image for -wii60-
-wii60-

3287

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 -wii60-
Member since 2007 • 3287 Posts
PS3 Doing 2560x1600 ??? :lol: that was a joke or what?