I have proof 360 is a tad more powerful then PS3.

all you need to do is go read the March issue of game informer. And the guy who made both chips for both Sony and MS the Cell and the CPU in the 360. In this interview that was very good and in depth. He clearly states that the 360 CPU and the Cell are basically the same level of performance. And yes they just function different and are development for differt by developers. But again he clearly says they are both pretty much the same performance wise.

So lets just throw out the myth of the Cell being some god of CPU's this gen like Sony wanted to brain wash us with.

Ok So what do we know then that the 360 has the better GPU and has the better Ram flexibility. So one could basically = this to the 360 has the edge? I mean you have to say this. This comes from the guy who made the Cell so throw the super cpu myth out the window now.

Look this is not a flame this is just I read the March issue of Game informer yesterday. And read this interview with the creator of both the 360 cpu and the Cell.

Maybe this is why MS is not pressed and has big things in store. And even recently said just wait we have some games that are going to destroy the compitition for graphics king. Well only time will tell.

Oh and again no flame I own both system and both have nice looking games. Although I am very eager to see what MS has in store and still secret until E3.

both are pretty much equal with their own advantages and disadvantages.

He clearly states that the 360 CPU and the Cell are basically the same level of performance. But again he clearly says they are both pretty much the same performance wise.

ronjon_09

No game matches what Killzone 2 has on consoles graphically. 360 and Wii are inferior still untill i see one game that beats killzone 2.

all you need to do is go read the March issue of game informer. And the guy who made both chips for both Sony and MS the Cell and the CPU in the 360. In this interview that was very good and in depth. He clearly states that the 360 CPU and the Cell are basically the same level of performance. And yes they just function different and are development for differt by developers. But again he clearly says they are both pretty much the same performance wise.

So lets just throw out the myth of the Cell being some god of CPU's this gen like Sony wanted to brain wash us with.

Ok So what do we know then that the 360 has the better GPU and has the better Ram flexibility. So one could basically = this to the 360 has the edge? I mean you have to say this. This comes from the guy who made the Cell so throw the super cpu myth out the window now.

Look this is not a flame this is just I read the March issue of Game informer yesterday. And read this interview with the creator of both the 360 cpu and the Cell.

Maybe this is why MS is not pressed and has big things in store. And even recently said just wait we have some games that are going to destroy the compitition for graphics king. Well only time will tell.

Oh and again no flame I own both system and both have nice looking games. Although I am very eager to see what MS has in store and still secret until E3.

ronjon_09

i thought they're the same but clearly your title disagree with your post.. :shock:..

No game matches what Killzone 2 has on consoles graphically. 360 and Wii are inferior still untill i see one game that beats killzone 2.

Gamersince81

No game matches what Killzone 2 has on consoles graphically. 360 and Wii are inferior still untill i see one game that beats killzone 2.

Gamersince81

[QUOTE="Gamersince81"]

No game matches what Killzone 2 has on consoles graphically. 360 and Wii are inferior still untill i see one game that beats killzone 2.

pyromaniac223

yeah true.. but when uncharted MGS4 and KZ2 is released, it makes 360 inferior.

No game matches what Killzone 2 has on consoles graphically. 360 and Wii are inferior still untill i see one game that beats killzone 2.

Gamersince81

Killzone2 VS Gears2 = Apples VS Bananas! How about use multiplats as comparation?

In certin parts Gears 2 looks better then Killzone 2 and in certin parts Killzone 2 looks better then Gears 2.

[QUOTE="Gamersince81"]

No game matches what Killzone 2 has on consoles graphically. 360 and Wii are inferior still untill i see one game that beats killzone 2.

PAL360

Killzone2 VS Gears2 = Apples VS Bananas! How about use multiplats as comparation?

multiplats doesnt mean anything interms of console capabilites. some bad multiplats is just a result of a bad port.

all you need to do is go read the March issue of game informer. And the guy who made both chips for both Sony and MS the Cell and the CPU in the 360. In this interview that was very good and in depth. He clearly states that the 360 CPU and the Cell are basically the same level of performance. And yes they just function different and are development for differt by developers. But again he clearly says they are both pretty much the same performance wise.

So lets just throw out the myth of the Cell being some god of CPU's this gen like Sony wanted to brain wash us with.

Ok So what do we know then that the 360 has the better GPU and has the better Ram flexibility. So one could basically = this to the 360 has the edge? I mean you have to say this. This comes from the guy who made the Cell so throw the super cpu myth out the window now.

Look this is not a flame this is just I read the March issue of Game informer yesterday. And read this interview with the creator of both the 360 cpu and the Cell.

Maybe this is why MS is not pressed and has big things in store. And even recently said just wait we have some games that are going to destroy the compitition for graphics king. Well only time will tell.

Oh and again no flame I own both system and both have nice looking games. Although I am very eager to see what MS has in store and still secret until E3.

all you need to do is go read the March issue of game informer. And the guy who made both chips for both Sony and MS the Cell and the CPU in the 360. In this interview that was very good and in depth. He clearly states that the 360 CPU and the Cell are basically the same level of performance. And yes they just function different and are development for differt by developers. But again he clearly says they are both pretty much the same performance wise.

So lets just throw out the myth of the Cell being some god of CPU's this gen like Sony wanted to brain wash us with.

Ok So what do we know then that the 360 has the better GPU and has the better Ram flexibility. So one could basically = this to the 360 has the edge? I mean you have to say this. This comes from the guy who made the Cell so throw the super cpu myth out the window now.

Look this is not a flame this is just I read the March issue of Game informer yesterday. And read this interview with the creator of both the 360 cpu and the Cell.

Maybe this is why MS is not pressed and has big things in store. And even recently said just wait we have some games that are going to destroy the compitition for graphics king. Well only time will tell.

Oh and again no flame I own both system and both have nice looking games. Although I am very eager to see what MS has in store and still secret until E3.

[QUOTE="ronjon_09"]

Where are your sources retard?

Ultima-MGS4

I don't care what you say personally,because i'm not some 12 yr old that tattles on people,but someone else might report you to Mods for flaming,so you might wanna chill out on calling people "retards",that's if you wanna stay a member here..or don't..i could care less,just thought i'd give some friendly advice.

Heres proof that it's not ;)

is this enough or do you want more proof ?

all you need to do is go read the March issue of game informer. And the guy who made both chips for both Sony and MS the Cell and the CPU in the 360. In this interview that was very good and in depth. He clearly states that the 360 CPU and the Cell are basically the same level of performance. And yes they just function different and are development for differt by developers. But again he clearly says they are both pretty much the same performance wise.

So lets just throw out the myth of the Cell being some god of CPU's this gen like Sony wanted to brain wash us with.

Ok So what do we know then that the 360 has the better GPU and has the better Ram flexibility. So one could basically = this to the 360 has the edge? I mean you have to say this. This comes from the guy who made the Cell so throw the super cpu myth out the window now.

Look this is not a flame this is just I read the March issue of Game informer yesterday. And read this interview with the creator of both the 360 cpu and the Cell.

Maybe this is why MS is not pressed and has big things in store. And even recently said just wait we have some games that are going to destroy the compitition for graphics king. Well only time will tell.

Oh and again no flame I own both system and both have nice looking games. Although I am very eager to see what MS has in store and still secret until E3.

[QUOTE="PAL360"]

[QUOTE="Gamersince81"]

No game matches what Killzone 2 has on consoles graphically. 360 and Wii are inferior still untill i see one game that beats killzone 2.

___gamemaster__

Killzone2 VS Gears2 = Apples VS Bananas! How about use multiplats as comparation?

That made sense back in 2006/7. We are in 09 and multiplats still look better on the 360. These days it sound more like a cheap excuse...

Anyway, im not saying that the 360 is more powerfull. Im just sure that PS3 is not more powerfull asewll! Both are very similar...

multiplats doesnt mean anything interms of console capabilites. some bad multiplats is just a result of a bad port.

the cell...
we were a couple of young men from Sony strolling on a lunchbreak out on a hillside when a very small asteroid crashed a few feet next to us
after making sure we were all okay we found the asteroid wasn't a normal asteroid but a ball of alien material stronger than diamond...

the volcano hot ball now turned cold, pulled it's surface back and revealed a device that we named cell, knowing that it was probably the more technological advanced thing on the planet we did our best and managed to copy the cell into the future PS3s

still today a couple of years later we have no clue what and where the cell came from and what it's really capable of. It is believed discovering it's true power will lead us into a new age of civilization.

[QUOTE="Ultima-MGS4"][QUOTE="ronjon_09"]

all you need to do is go read the March issue of game informer. And the guy who made both chips for both Sony and MS the Cell and the CPU in the 360. In this interview that was very good and in depth. He clearly states that the 360 CPU and the Cell are basically the same level of performance. And yes they just function different and are development for differt by developers. But again he clearly says they are both pretty much the same performance wise.

So lets just throw out the myth of the Cell being some god of CPU's this gen like Sony wanted to brain wash us with.

Ok So what do we know then that the 360 has the better GPU and has the better Ram flexibility. So one could basically = this to the 360 has the edge? I mean you have to say this. This comes from the guy who made the Cell so throw the super cpu myth out the window now.

Look this is not a flame this is just I read the March issue of Game informer yesterday. And read this interview with the creator of both the 360 cpu and the Cell.

Maybe this is why MS is not pressed and has big things in store. And even recently said just wait we have some games that are going to destroy the compitition for graphics king. Well only time will tell.

Oh and again no flame I own both system and both have nice looking games. Although I am very eager to see what MS has in store and still secret until E3.

TX360

anyone with common sense would kno that ease of development doesnt = power... its that simple

ps3 exclusives like killzone 2 have already proved that ps3 has a better cpu and gpu

Where are your sources retard It's pretty obvious that the PS3's Cell Engine is majorly superior. Honnestly, it makes the 360's processor look last gen. Somehow I still believe 360 fanboys are in denial of PS3's computer power. More flexible RAM? They both have 512 mb shared between 2 tasks. However the 360's Ram is snailing away at 700mhz Whilst the PS3's Ram is far ahead with 3200mhz. The Cellengine can do 3 trillion calculations per second, did you know the 360's Xenon can't even do 1 trillion? However the Xenon and Cell run at the same speed of 3.2ghz, sadly enough for you SPE's run faster than cores at a dedicated task such as gaming. And the PS3 has 7 SPE's supposed to 360's 3 cores. As for the GPU, the 360's GPU is under 1 TeraFlop, Erm, 700GFlops I think. PS3 delievers a crushing blow once more with a 1.8 TeraFlop performance Graphics card. (The ATI 4870X2 is 2.1 TFLOPS). But lets just put a side those silly calculations and mhz speed and mb of memory okay? Still don't think the PS3 is more powerful? Xbox360 1 TeraFlop overall float performance (WEAK) PS3 : 2 TeraFlops overall float performance (POWERFUL) Nuff said.

"A LINK TO ALL YOUR INFO PLEASE "

However even if all your spec information is 100% correct, The PS3 has been out for well over 2 years now and yet certain multiplats still look and play better on 360, so how do you explain that ? Ya' know since the PS3 is so much more powerful, then why isn't it's multiplat games far superior looking and playing then 360's versions ? Two recent examples i can name is Tiger Woods 09 and Fallout 3 each of those games are so much better than there PS3 counterparts and even rated higher by most reviewers. So again i ask when does your superior PS3 spec list come into play ?, when will dev's use this all powerful hardware of yours to actually make superior games to 360's ?

Xbox 360 - 1 teraflop overall float performance ( still superior looking and playing games to PS3)

PS3 - 2 Teraflops overall float performance ( Has made zero difference in multiplats against 360 )

Nuff said.

Is everybody ready? This is gonna be a shocker?

They are even. OMG!

Both have advantages and disadvantages in performance, so it's pointless to sit there and state one is more powerful than the other.

all you need to do is go read the March issue of game informer. And the guy who made both chips for both Sony and MS the Cell and the CPU in the 360. In this interview that was very good and in depth. He clearly states that the 360 CPU and the Cell are basically the same level of performance. And yes they just function different and are development for differt by developers. But again he clearly says they are both pretty much the same performance wise.

So lets just throw out the myth of the Cell being some god of CPU's this gen like Sony wanted to brain wash us with.

Ok So what do we know then that the 360 has the better GPU and has the better Ram flexibility. So one could basically = this to the 360 has the edge? I mean you have to say this. This comes from the guy who made the Cell so throw the super cpu myth out the window now.

Look this is not a flame this is just I read the March issue of Game informer yesterday. And read this interview with the creator of both the 360 cpu and the Cell.

Maybe this is why MS is not pressed and has big things in store. And even recently said just wait we have some games that are going to destroy the compitition for graphics king. Well only time will tell.

Oh and again no flame I own both system and both have nice looking games. Although I am very eager to see what MS has in store and still secret until E3.

ps3 exclusives like killzone 2 have already proved that ps3 has a better cpu and gpu

sasapac

360 GPU>>>RSX this is a fact that can not be disputed. But what still remains the catch is if the Cell is hype or nothing special at all?

When it comes to graphics I let the games speak, uncharted on ps3 looks better then anything on 360. ps3 is more powerful then 360 no matter what others say a fact is a fact and is proven by games.

[QUOTE="Gamersince81"]

No game matches what Killzone 2 has on consoles graphically. 360 and Wii are inferior still untill i see one game that beats killzone 2.

PAL360

Killzone2 VS Gears2 = Apples VS Bananas! How about use multiplats as comparation?

Can't we compare the color and shape of an apple to a banana? Comparing an apple to an apple is ridiculous and will get you nowhere.

When it comes to graphics I let the games speak, uncharted on ps3 looks better then anything on 360. ps3 is more powerful then 360 no matter what others say a fact is a fact and is proven by games.

sikanderahmed

[QUOTE="TX360"][QUOTE="Ultima-MGS4"] Where are your sources retard It's pretty obvious that the PS3's Cell Engine is majorly superior. Honnestly, it makes the 360's processor look last gen. Somehow I still believe 360 fanboys are in denial of PS3's computer power. More flexible RAM? They both have 512 mb shared between 2 tasks. However the 360's Ram is snailing away at 700mhz Whilst the PS3's Ram is far ahead with 3200mhz. The Cellengine can do 3 trillion calculations per second, did you know the 360's Xenon can't even do 1 trillion? However the Xenon and Cell run at the same speed of 3.2ghz, sadly enough for you SPE's run faster than cores at a dedicated task such as gaming. And the PS3 has 7 SPE's supposed to 360's 3 cores. As for the GPU, the 360's GPU is under 1 TeraFlop, Erm, 700GFlops I think. PS3 delievers a crushing blow once more with a 1.8 TeraFlop performance Graphics card. (The ATI 4870X2 is 2.1 TFLOPS). But lets just put a side those silly calculations and mhz speed and mb of memory okay? Still don't think the PS3 is more powerful? Xbox360 1 TeraFlop overall float performance (WEAK) PS3 : 2 TeraFlops overall float performance (POWERFUL) Nuff said.Jfisch93

When it comes to graphics I let the games speak, uncharted on ps3 looks better then anything on 360. ps3 is more powerful then 360 no matter what others say a fact is a fact and is proven by games.

sikanderahmed

[QUOTE="sikanderahmed"]

When it comes to graphics I let the games speak, uncharted on ps3 looks better then anything on 360. ps3 is more powerful then 360 no matter what others say a fact is a fact and is proven by games.

SAGE_OF_FIRE

[QUOTE="Gamersince81"]

No game matches what Killzone 2 has on consoles graphically. 360 and Wii are inferior still untill i see one game that beats killzone 2.

PAL360

Killzone2 VS Gears2 = Apples VS Bananas! How about use multiplats as comparation?

In certin parts Gears 2 looks better then Killzone 2 and in certin parts Killzone 2 looks better then Gears 2.

ronjon_09

Which console is stronger? Hard to tell....

Which one has the best looking game? PS3.

[QUOTE="Gamersince81"]

No game matches what Killzone 2 has on consoles graphically. 360 and Wii are inferior still untill i see one game that beats killzone 2.

pyromaniac223

It makes the 360 inferior when no other game for the 360 has accomplished what KZ2 has. Especially considering that the 360 has been on market for a longer period of time.

Remember us cows have more than 1 game to boast about graphics with, Drakes Fortune, MGS4, KZ2, GT5p, heck even MotorStorm:PR shows some great graphics for a arcade dirt racer. And then to think enemies on screen, Rfom, R2 (60 player online), Warhawk (40 player online), Socom (32 player online) KZ2 (32 player online)and soon to have MAG (with 256 players online).

As far as I'm concerned the consoles may be equal but until MS allows someone to show me that they truely are then the PS3 is a monster, that hasn't even been truely realised by devs.

Also I think most devs for the 360 are just money hungry and rush games out since it is so easy to develope for and don't push any boundaries. So who knows that maybe the reason for the 360's demise or it just can't do what the ps3 can do, take your choice. Either way 360 owners are slowly getting a raw deal.

[QUOTE="sasapac"]

ps3 exclusives like killzone 2 have already proved that ps3 has a better cpu and gpu

ronjon_09

360 GPU>>>RSX this is a fact that can not be disputed. But what still remains the catch is if the Cell is hype or nothing special at all?

prove me that the gpu of the 360 is better that the ps3's gpu. killzone 2 is the console graphics king followed by metal gear solid 4 which are both ps3 exclusives. how can you say that 360's gpu is better that ps3's gpu?

great , now where are the exclusives? the console is lacking in that dept.spike6566

[QUOTE="spike6566"]great , now where are the exclusives? the console is lacking in that dept.xsubtownerx

[QUOTE="xsubtownerx"][QUOTE="spike6566"]great , now where are the exclusives? the console is lacking in that dept.rorskarch

No it's not, because the 360 doesn't have the Cell. The Cell is believed to have been created by an ancient alien race known as the Cellzors. The Cellzors came to earth years ago seeking to create the most powerful videogame machine known to mankind. Lord Kutaragi and his apprentice Kaz Hirai promptly met up with the Cellzors and a deal was stuck. The Cell Broadband Engine® was developed deep within the bowels of Sony HQ by the Cellzors for years, until the PS3 was ready to launch. Many have said that The Cell Broadband Engine® can bend time itself using mystical 4D powers. Of course, only the Cellzors themselves and Lord Kutaragi know if this is true. And we are only in year 3 of Lord Kutaragi's 10 year plan- earth has not seen everything the Cell is capable of. Never doubt the Cellzors. The 360 does not stand a chance. No-one stands a chance against- The Cell Broadband Engine®.

[QUOTE="rorskarch"][QUOTE="xsubtownerx"] Um, the 360 has more exclusives than the PS3. lulzxsubtownerx

:lol:

yea, yea sure it does...

dont worry, i wont burst your bubble though.

No it's not, because the 360 doesn't have the Cell. The Cell is believed to have been created by an ancient alien race known as the Cellzors. The Cellzors came to earth years ago seeking to create the most powerful videogame machine known to mankind. Lord Kutaragi and his apprentice Kaz Hirai promptly met up with the Cellzors and a deal was stuck. The Cell Broadband Engine® was developed deep within the bowels of Sony HQ by the Cellzors for years, until the PS3 was ready to launch. Many have said that The Cell Broadband Engine® can bend time itself using mystical 4D powers. Of course, only the Cellzors themselves and Lord Kutaragi know if this is true. And we are only in year 3 of Lord Kutaragi's 10 year plan- earth has not seen everything the Cell is capable of. Never doubt the Cellzors. The 360 does not stand a chance. No-one stands a chance against- The Cell Broadband Engine®.

Floppy_Jim

The Cell will bring discipline and order to the world.

[QUOTE="ronjon_09"]

[QUOTE="sasapac"]

ps3 exclusives like killzone 2 have already proved that ps3 has a better cpu and gpu

sasapac

360 GPU>>>RSX this is a fact that can not be disputed. But what still remains the catch is if the Cell is hype or nothing special at all?

prove me that the gpu of the 360 is better that the ps3's gpu. killzone 2 is the console graphics king followed by metal gear solid 4 which are both ps3 exclusives. how can you say that 360's gpu is better that ps3's gpu?

RSX is based off of older tech. And the 360 GPU is based off of newer tech that Nvidia went with later in there newer PC cards. This ia FACT. Not to mention the 360 GPU has slight direct X 10 capibilities. Also not to mention the 360 GPU has 10mbimbeded ram this is why we see games with better AA in 360 versions. Oh and also the 360 GPU has an onboard physics capibility. This is all fact not by me but by the GPU's themselfs. Do some research.

all you need to do is go read the March issue of game informer. And the guy who made both chips for both Sony and MS the Cell and the CPU in the 360. In this interview that was very good and in depth. He clearly states that the 360 CPU and the Cell are basically the same level of performance. And yes they just function different and are development for differt by developers. But again he clearly says they are both pretty much the same performance wise.

So lets just throw out the myth of the Cell being some god of CPU's this gen like Sony wanted to brain wash us with.

Ok So what do we know then that the 360 has the better GPU and has the better Ram flexibility. So one could basically = this to the 360 has the edge? I mean you have to say this. This comes from the guy who made the Cell so throw the super cpu myth out the window now.

Look this is not a flame this is just I read the March issue of Game informer yesterday. And read this interview with the creator of both the 360 cpu and the Cell.

Maybe this is why MS is not pressed and has big things in store. And even recently said just wait we have some games that are going to destroy the compitition for graphics king. Well only time will tell.

Oh and again no flame I own both system and both have nice looking games. Although I am very eager to see what MS has in store and still secret until E3.

ronjon_09

So using some form of logic, despite what the creator of both chips said, you somehow fathom the 360 is more powerful anyway?

In my humble opinion I think the PS3 can produce better lighting from help from the Cell. And I think the 360 can produce better textures from help with better ram and tad better GPU design.