I own only a PS3, but honestly, IMO, multi-platform games look better on 360

[QUOTE="Abicus7"]

[QUOTE="garland51"]

And you canjudge graphics on consoles on multiplats from exclusives. They prove that the 360 is a better gaming machine,

garland51

Wait..What?

I'm saying that you can judge which console has better graphics with multiplats. Exclusives don't mean anything.

I dont think its as night / day as that.. there are so many factors that come into play.. Like the amount of experience the Dev have with the console. Or the console it was first made for, or the amount of time / money spent .. there is so much going on.

[QUOTE="vaderhater"]Really need a spread sheet on this who was the lead console for which game thing. I dont have time for it but perhaps someone can?

opex07

I think there have only been a few notable titles that have had the PS3 as their lead platform:

DMC4

Mirror's Edge

Burnout Paradise

Ghost Busters

Virtual Fighter 5

unreleased:

Tekken 5

FFXIII

of the top of my head.

Thing is that when you translate that to your tv, it won't make any real difference in most cases.

Yeah, PS3 may have the edge on exclusives but when it comes to multiplats, 90% look better on the 360. And there are more multiplats than exclusives, so ..... i guess 360>PS3 :lol:Nidget

the sad thing is, people care about tiny differences in graphics. I only own a pc, but I like both the 360 and ps3, but how people can argue so much over something so menial is almost comical. Omg, the shadows on the pipes, LOOK! LOOK!rabakill

wow. you sir are a revolutionary. i personally think i speak for all of us when i say that when you figured out that multi-plats on the 360 looked better by a ridiculously small margin, you opened all of our eyes. you forever changed how we all will look towards video games. and maybe even life for that matter. you shall forever be a legend in sw. lol

[QUOTE="lightleggy"][QUOTE="Kleeyook"]Blame the game developers! Not PS3! :(vaderhater

[QUOTE="vaderhater"]

[QUOTE="lightleggy"] thatermacness

[QUOTE="neo_starwind"]

[QUOTE="12345678ew"]

the only difference is the brightness of the colors which can be fixed by changing 3 settings on ps3.... and that website is useless

Abicus7

the point is not how big is the difference. The point is that almost every multiplat looks or perform better on 360 and this gen 90% of games are multiplats. Yeah, PS3 has 2 or 3 exclusives than look a bit better than anything on 360 but i prefer to have hundreds of better looking multiplats than 2 or 3 better looking exclusives any time...

I'm sure the average consumer really cares about multiplats looking minisculy better on 360 while they have fun on great PS3 exclusives that are remarkably better looking.

When i play a multiplat on PS3 or XBOX im not thinking about wow this game looks worse/better by a bit on the other console!

Get over yourself...

[QUOTE="Abicus7"]Anyways the difference is so small you wouldnt actually notice while playing.neo_starwind

[QUOTE="Abicus7"]

[QUOTE="Nidget"]

Exclusives > Multiplats.

Anyways the difference is so small you wouldnt actually notice while playing. Unless you paused the game, stuck your nose up to the screen and started pixel counting.

garland51

Oh, really? The difference isn't neglible; it has been quantified quite a lot since the launch of the systems and it still happens today, just not as big a difference now as it used to be. And you can judge graphics on consoles on multiplats from exclusives. They prove that the 360 is a better gaming machine, & that most multiplats run, look, and play better than PS3.

the only difference is the brightness of the colors which can be fixed by changing 3 settings on ps3.... and that website is useless

12345678ew

Then you might want to take a look at this site here.

Not to mention that PS3 has more multiplats that are in Sub-HD than the 360. Not even MGS 4 was in Real HD. If it wasn't for uncompressed audio, then the 360 can very easily handle that game and make it in Real HD.

Link

About that sub-hd resolution multiplats on the ps3, you know that the door on that particular situation swings both way right? While the ps3 have more multiplats that run in sub HD, it also have more games that runs in a native 1080p signal than the 360

[QUOTE="Abicus7"]

[QUOTE="Nidget"]Yeah, PS3 may have the edge on exclusives but when it comes to multiplats, 90% look better on the 360. And there are more multiplats than exclusives, so ..... i guess 360>PS3 :lol:Nidget

Its because Devs find it easier and cheaper to develop for the 360 first and then port it to the PS3. But its not a big difference, the Exclusives more than make up for it :p Besides if you own a gaming rig it shouldnt be a problem :DSolid_Tango

Still when the lead platform is the PS3 (Dead Space, CoD4, Assassins Creed, Ghostbusters, etc...) the game ends up looking the same if not better on 360...

Why is that? :|

[QUOTE="Abicus7"]

I'm saying that you can judge which console has better graphics with multiplats. Exclusives don't mean anything.

[QUOTE="opex07"][QUOTE="Jerell_rast"]Blame the developers. EA has done a terrible job at it in Need for Speed:Shift. The game itself is very good.garland51

Bingo. It's not the developers fault that the PS3 is more harder to develop games for, & that the PS3 doesn't have a better GPU & more RAM than the 360.

Your looking at ports, see Uncharted 2.

jakehouston88

We dont have a 360 version of Uncharted2 to compare with...

[QUOTE="Abicus7"]

Yeah, PS3 may have the edge on exclusives but when it comes to multiplats, 90% look better on the 360. And there are more multiplats than exclusives, so ..... i guess 360>PS3 :lol:Nidget

[QUOTE="vaderhater"]Really need a spread sheet on this who was the lead console for which game thing. I dont have time for it but perhaps someone can?

opex07

I think there have only been a few notable titles that have had the PS3 as their lead platform:

DMC4: looked better by a little bit on the 360, but the manditory installs made it run better on the ps3

Mirror's Edge: i believe that this game went in as a draw

Burnout Paradise: definitely better on the ps3

Ghost Busters: much better on the 360, but didn't the dev even try with the ps3 port?

Virtual Fighter 5: while this was overall much better on the 360, it had a 6 months delay as well

unreleased:

Tekken 5: Don't you mean Tekken 6? and from what is out now, the only way the 360 would perform better than the ps3 version is if the blur effects were turned off

FFXIII: the verdict is still out on this one, but from the news and recent pics we saw, it favored the ps3

of the top of my head.

Wow. Lots of delusional PS3 fanboys on this site. If you can't see the difference, then you are blind, I'm sorry.
And it's not a small difference either: the 360 versions benefit heavily from the Ambient Occlusion.
My question is why the hell the developers dropped this effect from the PS3 versions.

Does this happen at Capcom, EA, etc: "Let's remove the shadows on objects in the environments of the superior console because obviously that makes sense, you know?"
wtf

Don't you mean Tekken 6? ermacness

The Ps3 wasn't built to show its power with Multiplatform titles. BRING THE UNCHARTED 2 SCREENSHOTS NAW :PAgentA-Mi6

Ooouh, with pleasure capitan :P

[QUOTE="Solid_Tango"]Its because Devs find it easier and cheaper to develop for the 360 first and then port it to the PS3. But its not a big difference, the Exclusives more than make up for it :p Besides if you own a gaming rig it shouldnt be a problem :DPAL360

Still when the lead platform is the PS3 (Dead Space, CoD4, Assassins Creed, Ghostbusters, etc...) the game ends up looking the same if not better on 360...

Why is that? :|

[QUOTE="opex07"]

[QUOTE="vaderhater"]Really need a spread sheet on this who was the lead console for which game thing. I dont have time for it but perhaps someone can?

ermacness

I think there have only been a few notable titles that have had the PS3 as their lead platform:

DMC4: looked better by a little bit on the 360, but the manditory installs made it run better on the ps3

Mirror's Edge: i believe that this game went in as a draw

Burnout Paradise: definitely better on the ps3

Ghost Busters: much better on the 360, but didn't the dev even try with the ps3 port?

Virtual Fighter 5: while this was overall much better on the 360, it had a 6 months delay as well

unreleased:

Tekken 5: Don't you mean Tekken 6? and from what is out now, the only way the 360 would perform better than the ps3 version is if the blur effects were turned off

FFXIII: the verdict is still out on this one, but from the news and recent pics we saw, it favored the ps3

of the top of my head.

No way, really :o

One would have to nitpick to see differences

thelastguy

Everyone knows this already.

Threads like these confirm that System Wars is stupid and should be deleted. The GameSpot admin(s) should kill it with fire now! But, seriously, I can't even post here anymore because SW is so damn redundant and boring. Just worthless. This board should be removed.

It is a well know fact that the 360 has a better GPUbut the PS3 has a better CPU.

Yeah, there's a difference, but it's not much. People that have never seen a multiplat on 360 and just on PS3 (like RE5 for example) are going to think it looks great. I know I did, but when I played the 360, I did notice a difference, but it wasn't a very big one.

[QUOTE="Nidget"]Yeah, PS3 may have the edge on exclusives but when it comes to multiplats, 90% look better on the 360. And there are more multiplats than exclusives, so ..... i guess 360>PS3 :lol:Abicus7

Exclusives > Multiplats.

Anyways the difference is so small you wouldnt actually notice while playing. Unless you paused the game, stuck your nose up to the screen and started pixel counting.

And happened to have the 360 version right next to you.

[QUOTE="Nidget"] Um no not really. Theyre all just games, whether exclusive or not. We judge them individually, not based on their exclusivity.

When it comes to graphics.. and that is what we are talking about...

Exclusive > Multiplats.

You know what? I can barely distinguich between them. The only one where the difference is clear is Shift. Which I really wouldn't notice either unless pointed out.

[QUOTE="Nidget"]Yeah, PS3 may have the edge on exclusives but when it comes to multiplats, 90% look better on the 360. And there are more multiplats than exclusives, so ..... i guess 360>PS3 :lol:Abicus7

Exclusives > Multiplats.

Anyways the difference is so small you wouldnt actually notice while playing. Unless you paused the game, stuck your nose up to the screen and started pixel counting.

This is why journalism is stupid. They even can't make graphics an objective matter. Eurogamer has more than 50% games better on xbox 360. While ign has around 30%. Which is a 20%. I mean how the heck can you be biased about this matter. I really hate gaming journalism though. Eurogamer and ign either could be biased in this occasion.

Wow. Lots of delusional PS3 fanboys on this site. If you can't see the difference, then you are blind, I'm sorry.
And it's not a small difference either: the 360 versions benefit heavily from the Ambient Occlusion.
My question is why the hell the developers dropped this effect from the PS3 versions.

Does this happen at Capcom, EA, etc: "Let's remove the shadows on objects in the environments of the superior console because obviously that makes sense, you know?"
wtf

neo_starwind

[QUOTE="Nidget"][QUOTE="Abicus7"]

When it comes to graphics.. and that is what we are talking about...

Exclusive > Multiplats.

rhaigun

[QUOTE="rhaigun"][QUOTE="Nidget"] Again, not always. Its down to the developers. Nidget