This topic is locked from further discussion.
Look how much that has cost Sony... Personally I had a PS2 last gen on launch and I don't have a PS3, the games just don't interest me. I enjoy all games but what I love the most is FPS/RPG(any kind) This is where I drew the line and crossed to the 360 camp. Bioshock is still one of my favorite games this generation, along with Lost Odyssey and Mass Effect. The future lineup just doesn't thrill me into buying it... I love MGS with a passion but it isn't worth me purchasing it for one game. Socom went downhill after the second one (played both frequently), I became disinterested with the FF series after X-2, (I have every FF up until then) and LBP seems a bit too kiddy for my tastes. The proof is in the pudding, the quality of games that are out on the 360 are reviewed higher and have much better sales than the PS3 counterparts. I do however hate what gamerscore has done to my mentality of gaming as a whole (cant not finish a game 100%).Actually, that's the sad thing. The PS3 is not trash. It's a much better piece of hardware than the 360, but Sony's decisions, that led to a less than average library at the moment, is what holds it back.
I am no fanboy(except a small fondness to Nintendo games) and I want to see all consoles do well. Hell, I own them all.
skingus
I love the gamerscore feature, it gives games far more replay value.jeffdoomsdayIt dooms people who have a need to complete games...
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment