If Killzone 2 were on the pc...

What do you think the specs would be to run it? minimum and recommendedRequimforaDream

Minimum

Single Core CPU @ 2.5-3.0 GHz

512 MB of RAM

nVidia 8000 GPU series or higher

========================

Recommended

Dual Core CPU @ 2.2 GHz

2 GB of RAM

nVidia 8800 GPU seriesor higher

That would be my guess.

[QUOTE="RequimforaDream"] What do you think the specs would be to run it? minimum and recommendedDarkGamer007

Minimum

Single Core CPU @ 2.5-3.0 GHz

512 MB of RAM

nVidia 8000 GPU series or higher

========================

Recommended

Dual Core CPU @ 2.2 GHz

2 GB of RAM

nVidia 8800 GPU seriesor higher

That would be my guess.

The PS3 specs is a 7900 GPU and all that right? Base it around that.

EDIT: ps3 lawl

Minimum- the lowest settings

Pentium 4/ Athlon 64 2.0 Ghz

Nvidia 7800/ ATI radeon X1X00 series.

1GB of ram

Max, Higest settings

C2D, 2.5GHZ/ Phenom 2.5 GHZ

Nvidia 8800/ Redeon HD 3850

2GB of Ram

it would need the i7 cpu just for the physics alone.

it would need the i7 cpu just for the physics alone.

ZoomZoom2490

it would need the i7 cpu just for the physics alone.

ZoomZoom2490

*facepalm* No, no it wouldn't Crysis has better physics than Killzone 2 and it does not require a i7 processor, the Cell is also weaker than an i7 processor.

If KZ2 was on the PC I do not think anyone would care about the game.rybe1025

it would need the i7 cpu just for the physics alone.

ZoomZoom2490

What physics, the game mainly consists of pre-baked animation lol.

[QUOTE="ZoomZoom2490"]

it would need the i7 cpu just for the physics alone.

What physics, the game mainly consists of pre-baked animation lol.

[QUOTE="ZoomZoom2490"]

it would need the i7 cpu just for the physics alone.

DarkGamer007

*facepalm* No, no it wouldn't Crysis has better physics than Killzone 2 and it does not require a i7 processor, the Cell is also weaker than an i7 processor.

He is a fanboy, don't bother. Just go check out his thread of Uncharted 2 bullshots claiming ownage over Crysis.

[QUOTE="ZoomZoom2490"]

it would need the i7 cpu just for the physics alone.

What physics, the game mainly consists of pre-baked animation lol.

They WERE pre-rendered animations, not physics. You can't destroy anything in the game. You can't even shoot through walls = EPIC FAIL. The only FPS's that hava REAL physics are Crysis/Warhead, BF Bad Company, and a few Unreal Engine games I believe.

They WERE pre-rendered animations, not physics. You can't destroy anything in the game. You can't even shoot through walls = EPIC FAIL. The only FPS's that hava REAL physics are Crysis/Warhead, BF Bad Company, and a few Unreal Engine games I believe.

Hanass

it would require the l33test i7 processor and triple GTX295.....and hermits would brag about that game in every thread and post its pic along with crysis

It would probably run on the current average PC "gamer" specs. But it would at least have a FOV over 45 degrees.Killzone 2 has one of the smallest FOVs I've ever seen in a FPS. It was like playing the game while wearing a helmet with the visor down, which was really annoying since the lead character didn't wear a helmet. It was really distracting to me.

It would probably run on the current average PC "gamer" specs. But it would at least have a FOV over 45 degrees.Killzone 2 has one of the smallest FOVs I've ever seen in a FPS. It was like playing the game while wearing a helmet with the visor down, which was really annoying since the lead character didn't wear a helmet. It was really distracting to me.

heretrix

Not enough RAM to render the whole picture

It would probably run on the current average PC "gamer" specs. But it would at least have a FOV over 45 degrees.Killzone 2 has one of the smallest FOVs I've ever seen in a FPS. It was like playing the game while wearing a helmet with the visor down, which was really annoying since the lead character didn't wear a helmet. It was really distracting to me.

heretrix

Is this true? Because i felt that something wasn't right while playing it, i even got motion sickness and never got that with any other game.

To equal the PS3 settings...

Any dual-core cpu with core clock 2.2GHz and above

$60 graphics card

2GB RAM

[QUOTE="heretrix"]

It would probably run on the current average PC "gamer" specs. But it would at least have a FOV over 45 degrees.Killzone 2 has one of the smallest FOVs I've ever seen in a FPS. It was like playing the game while wearing a helmet with the visor down, which was really annoying since the lead character didn't wear a helmet. It was really distracting to me.

Furzjodler

Is this true? Because i felt that something wasn't right while playing it, i even got motion sickness and never got that with any other game.

to get the same graphics as the ps3 version or better, very high specs.stylesPS3

[QUOTE="DAZZER7"]

[QUOTE="ZoomZoom2490"]

it would need the i7 cpu just for the physics alone.

ZoomZoom2490

What physics, the game mainly consists of pre-baked animation lol.

Umm actually, physics is precisely the subject I did at Uni :lol:

physics I know quite well actually

[QUOTE="RequimforaDream"] What do you think the specs would be to run it? minimum and recommendedDarkGamer007

Minimum

Single Core CPU @ 2.5-3.0 GHz

512 MB of RAM

nVidia 8000 GPU series or higher

========================

Recommended

Dual Core CPU @ 2.2 GHz

2 GB of RAM

nVidia 8800 GPU seriesor higher

That would be my guess.

[QUOTE="stylesPS3"]to get the same graphics as the ps3 version or better, very high specs.heretrix

it would need the i7 cpu just for the physics alone.

ZoomZoom2490

I know your a troll, but anyway.

Crysis has far more going on in terms of physics. Almost all the foliage has some physics going on, and some of it and buildings are fully destructible.

That may be overkill, its a PS3 game, PC hardware has surpassed PS3 (and 360) hardware over 2 years ago.Phazevariance

I think optimization is the key word here. Just look at The Ghostbusters.

[QUOTE="heretrix"]

[QUOTE="stylesPS3"]to get the same graphics as the ps3 version or better, very high specs.stylesPS3

[QUOTE="heretrix"]

[QUOTE="stylesPS3"]to get the same graphics as the ps3 version or better, very high specs.stylesPS3

Actually, I would love to see a narrow corridor shooter like Killzone 2 built from the ground up to run on the latest PC tech. Imagine using the same amount of system resources as Crysis but all focussed on rendering a nrrow, simply geometry shooter like Killzone 2?

[QUOTE="stylesPS3"][QUOTE="heretrix"]For a PC to emulate a system with a 3 year old graphics chipset? No. Absolutely not. The current gen PC graphics cards can do that without breaking a sweat.

comeonthehoops

AFAIK, the PS3's GPU is GF7800-7900ish in terms of power, I'm pretty sure that the 8600GTS was about equal to a 7900GT and the GT was a little less in actual gaming performance, though I may be wrong since it's been a while since I saw the tests.

[QUOTE="comeonthehoops"][QUOTE="stylesPS3"] sure they can i believe you. NO. ppl with average specs cant even produce 360 graphics let alone ps3. you need higher end specs to get them.swazidoughman

AFAIK, the PS3's GPU is GF7800-7900ish in terms of power,

Cut and pasted together.

Equal or better than consoles considering the res, 4xAA, and Very HQ for $60.

[QUOTE="heretrix"]

[QUOTE="stylesPS3"]to get the same graphics as the ps3 version or better, very high specs.stylesPS3

You're seriously delusional unless you're a fakeboy...

[QUOTE="stylesPS3"][QUOTE="heretrix"]For a PC to emulate a system with a 3 year old graphics chipset? No. Absolutely not. The current gen PC graphics cards can do that without breaking a sweat.

Cut and pasted together.

Equal or better than consoles considering the res, 4xAA, and Very HQ for $60.

gamecubepad

I think all you need you equal the console version is 1280x720, no AA (maybe 2x) 2-4 AF and probably only high.

I bet it would get over the 30 average of the console versions :P

I think all you need you equal the console version is 1280x720, no AA (maybe 2x) 2-4 AF and probably only high.

I bet it would get over the 30 average of the console versions :P

swazidoughman

Agreed. Misread the first time, sorry.

[QUOTE="heretrix"]

[QUOTE="stylesPS3"] sure they can i believe you. NO. ppl with average specs cant even produce 360 graphics let alone ps3. you need higher end specs to get them.stylesPS3

But what if the spec is so low that it's inexpensive. Then your "high-end" spec would be cheap...

[QUOTE="heretrix"]

[QUOTE="stylesPS3"] sure they can i believe you. NO. ppl with average specs cant even produce 360 graphics let alone ps3. you need higher end specs to get them.stylesPS3

[QUOTE="stylesPS3"][QUOTE="heretrix"]You can play Crysis on high settings with a really inexpensive video card which would qualify the "average" spec. If it can run Crysis, it can run any PS3 game with no problem.

But what if the spec is so low that it's inexpensive. Then your "high-end" spec would be cheap...

[QUOTE="heretrix"]

[QUOTE="stylesPS3"]to get the same graphics as the ps3 version or better, very high specs.stylesPS3

My now 3 year old computer can produce 360 graphics, and it only has 2 GB of RAM, a C2D @ 2.13Ghz, and a nVidia Geforce 7900 GS.

[QUOTE="stylesPS3"][QUOTE="heretrix"]You can play Crysis on high settings with a really inexpensive video card which would qualify the "average" spec. If it can run Crysis, it can run any PS3 game with no problem.

heretrix

ITT: A lot of people talking out of their ass. A PS3's GPU cannot be compared to a GPU in a PC with similar specs, same goes for every part of a console compared to a PC, you can never compare them directly, the PS3 having a 7900 equivalent GPU inside it means squat, less than squat actually. We'll never know what kind of hardware you would need to run KZ2 on a PC and it is fruitless even guessing.Im_single

Major Damage Control reporting for duty! lol.

Old crusty hardware is just that.

[QUOTE="stylesPS3"][QUOTE="heretrix"]For a PC to emulate a system with a 3 year old graphics chipset? No. Absolutely not. The current gen PC graphics cards can do that without breaking a sweat.

My now 3 year old computer can produce 360 graphics, and it only has 2 GB of RAM, a C2D @ 2.13Ghz, and a nVidia Geforce 7900 GS.