This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="charizard1605"]Okay, 30 million. Let's take 35 million units for Modern Warfare 3, okay? Still won't sell more than the 3DS's lifetime sales, will it? Dude, you seem to be in like this Call of Duty cult you know...CallOfDutyXxXHow do you know that, taking into account the disappointing start of 3DS?The 3DS is still selling faster then the DS at this point in its life.
The DS didn't start selling well until a year and half into its life when it started getting better games.
[QUOTE="CallOfDutyXxX"][QUOTE="charizard1605"] The DS sold for 150 million units worldwide. Sig it.charizard1605Yup. MW3 on the PS3 will see day-one sales of at least 3.5 million. And that's the first day, only. 3DS has been a failure for Nintendo now, not even 3 million in a month. So, you're saying that over its lifetime, Modern Warfare 3 on the PS3 will see more sales than the 3DS? :lol: Actually, you know what, let's make this more interesting. Let's keep it as all of Modern Warfare 3- on any and every platform, including a Wii and DS version, the PC and Xbox 360 versions, any versions that show up- let's keep it as ALL OF THOSE versus the 3DS, okay? The 3DS shipped 4 million units worldwide in its first month. It sold about 2.4 million of those. I wonder what 'failure' you are talking about.
actually it sold 3.61 million
So, you're saying that over its lifetime, Modern Warfare 3 on the PS3 will see more sales than the 3DS? :lol: Actually, you know what, let's make this more interesting. Let's keep it as all of Modern Warfare 3- on any and every platform, including a Wii and DS version, the PC and Xbox 360 versions, any versions that show up- let's keep it as ALL OF THOSE versus the 3DS, okay? The 3DS shipped 4 million units worldwide in its first month. It sold about 2.4 million of those. I wonder what 'failure' you are talking about.[QUOTE="charizard1605"][QUOTE="CallOfDutyXxX"] Yup. MW3 on the PS3 will see day-one sales of at least 3.5 million. And that's the first day, only. 3DS has been a failure for Nintendo now, not even 3 million in a month.jadjei
actually it sold 3.61 million
No, those were just the shipments made to retail.[QUOTE="charizard1605"][QUOTE="CallOfDutyXxX"] 20 million? Modern Warfare 2 sold 27 million copies: http://www.gamespot.com/ps3/action/call-of-duty-modern-warfare-3/news/6310982/call-of-duty-voice-actor-hints-at-modern-warfare-3 And Black Ops continues to sell like crazy. It presumably won't stop anytime soon, and when it's done and clear, it will have hit 30 million. Not to mention that it broke all the records that MW2 had previously broken. You obviously underestimate the selling capacity of COD.CallOfDutyXxXOkay, 30 million. Let's take 35 million units for Modern Warfare 3, okay? Still won't sell more than the 3DS's lifetime sales, will it? Dude, you seem to be in like this Call of Duty cult you know... How do you know that, taking into account the disappointing start of 3DS?
You seriously think ANY Nintendo handheld these days could sell less than 40 million lifetime sales, even if the 3DS were utter rubbish (which it isnt), it would sell on name alone and still get more than any MW game.
[QUOTE="charizard1605"][QUOTE="CallOfDutyXxX"] How do you know that, taking into account the disappointing start of 3DS?CallOfDutyXxXBecause the console would have to be a massive failure of epic proportions- like the Virtual Boy- to sell anything less than 35 million units.Or it would need a competitor like the PS2. Seeing as it's none of those- for the first, it's getting some excellent games in the next twelve months, and for the latter, where is that competition?- it will easily coast past 40, 50 million units. If 'disappointing starts' were all we went by, then the PS3 and the DS should have been discarded to begin woth and the Dreamcast and the N64 should have been the highest selling consoles of all time. Look how that turned out. Seriously dude, give it up. You like to talk about day one and month one sales for Call of Duty, and that's a flash in the pan. Me, I'm talking about sustained sales over months and years. OK, sure. I can see 3DS outselling MW3, but not until early 2013 at the earliest.
early 2013? You think it will take 2 years for the 3DS to hit the around 20-30 million?
OK, sure. I can see 3DS outselling MW3, but not until early 2013 at the earliest.[QUOTE="CallOfDutyXxX"][QUOTE="charizard1605"] Because the console would have to be a massive failure of epic proportions- like the Virtual Boy- to sell anything less than 35 million units.Or it would need a competitor like the PS2. Seeing as it's none of those- for the first, it's getting some excellent games in the next twelve months, and for the latter, where is that competition?- it will easily coast past 40, 50 million units. If 'disappointing starts' were all we went by, then the PS3 and the DS should have been discarded to begin woth and the Dreamcast and the N64 should have been the highest selling consoles of all time. Look how that turned out. Seriously dude, give it up. You like to talk about day one and month one sales for Call of Duty, and that's a flash in the pan. Me, I'm talking about sustained sales over months and years. _Matt_
early 2013? You think it will take 2 years for the 3DS to hit the around 20-30 million?
I bet it will be way before that especially with the line-up this holiday season. When Pokemon comes it will be even faster.[QUOTE="jadjei"][QUOTE="charizard1605"] So, you're saying that over its lifetime, Modern Warfare 3 on the PS3 will see more sales than the 3DS? :lol: Actually, you know what, let's make this more interesting. Let's keep it as all of Modern Warfare 3- on any and every platform, including a Wii and DS version, the PC and Xbox 360 versions, any versions that show up- let's keep it as ALL OF THOSE versus the 3DS, okay? The 3DS shipped 4 million units worldwide in its first month. It sold about 2.4 million of those. I wonder what 'failure' you are talking about.charizard1605
actually it sold 3.61 million
No, those were just the shipments made to retail.no nintendo annouced it sold 3.61 million worldwide and their aim was to sell 4 million which they shipped, just recently nintendo announced they finally sold 1 million 3ds in japan so probably the 3ds sold worldwide must probably at least be in 4-5 million, well by now.
companies dont care so much who is number 1 etc etc. they care about the projections. so if they want to make a 100 million in profit in 12 month for vita but they make less by only 10 million. then its not bad. if they predict 100 million in profits but make only 10. then its a failure...Simple question:
If the PS Vita fails to beat the 3DS is it a failure for Sony?
CwlHeddwyn
PSP was widely predicted to steamroll the DS. PSP was the first loss for Sony in the console war. IMO success or failure is based on what is expected from a company from previous performance. If a company is always coming in last and has low sales but then gets better sales and comes in second then I would say that's a success. IF you are always number 1 but then get soundly beaten that is comparatively speaking a failure.The PSP sold 70 million units and it 'lost' to the DS, would you call the PSP a failure for sony?
supdotcom
The PSP sold 70 million units and it 'lost' to the DS, would you call the PSP a failure for sony?
PSP was widely predicted to steamroll the DS. PSP was the first loss for Sony in the console war. IMO success or failure is based on what is expected from a company from previous performance. If a company is always coming in last and has low sales but then gets better sales and comes in second then I would say that's a success. IF you are always number 1 but then get soundly beaten that is comparatively speaking a failure. I think the lack of the second analog stick is what made it sell bad, I remember second guessing multiple times before I bought it, I ended up sellling it 6 months later. I expect the PSV to sell better, I say 25% better due to the second analog stick, and if it's marketed rigth (show off CoD on it to attract the FPS crowd etc.).should PSV have a large install base just like PSP has, and offer many great games just like PSP did and also have many extra functions/features just like PSP has than it will be a success just like PSP is for SONY..
lol @ mw3 on vita will outsell 3ds i dont think so ,
--- and i dont think nintendo or sony will be in trouble if either of these failed to out sell another,
because 1-3ds is making profit , has been since day one , sony has ps3 , and psp to fall back on , which already has a market, nintendo still gots ds , wii and the upcomign wii u
so nope , it will only mean that people werent ready for a new handheld
I still find it funny that people are trying to call the PSP a failure. It was Sony's first handheld and it sold over 70 million units. That is no failure by any stretch of the imagination. That is damn good for their first handheld. I didn't even get the PSP and got the DS instead and I am still saying this. The PSP is far from a failure and anybody saying it is is just letting their immature fanboyism show a bit too much. But like they say. haters are gonna hate.
No, but it's a failure if it ends up selling worse than the PSP. I would be surprised if this does'nt sell well, considering all the improvements. What is it people want in a handheld if not what the PSVita has?
Lets also factor in price this time around. Unlike last gen (PSP was $200 at launch and the DS was $150), the Vita cost the same as the 3DS. I also think that played a roll in the numbers of last gen, even if it was a small roll. Don't get me wrong, I am not saying the Vita will outsell the 3ds because I just don't know. And frankly, I couldn't care less if it does or not. I am interested in both, but am only picking up the Vita for now. If I do get the 3DS, it will be after a few price drops and a redesign. I just don't find the 3DS worth the asking price when I can get the Vita for the same price and it is way more powerful and with more control inputs and functions. Not to mention price drops in games. Sony has them and Nintendo.......not so much. Not hating on the 3DS, but it will be between $150-$170 before I fork out the money to buy myself one.
If I remember correctly Sony said before they're trying to meet/exceed the levels they reached with the first PSP, not really to outdo Nintendo.
In that regard, I think they'd be successful. The PSP wasn't a failure, it was really successful, especially for a company's first attempt at a handheld.
That was already dominated by Nintendo.If I remember correctly Sony said before they're trying to meet/exceed the levels they reached with the first PSP, not really to outdo Nintendo.
In that regard, I think they'd be successful. The PSP wasn't a failure, it was really successful, especially for a company's first attempt at a handheld
Haziqonfire
The fact that Sony even managed to release a second handheld is pretty successful I would say. Nintendo usually steam rolls over the competition so badly that they wouldn't even attempt a second handheld.
Yeah tell me about it. I loved my old Sega Gamegear, but they never released another one after that :cry::cry::cry:The fact that Sony even managed to release a second handheld is pretty successful I would say. Nintendo usually steam rolls over the competition so badly that they wouldn't even attempt a second handheld.
OneLazyAsian
Yeah, Nintendo could have delivered a handheld which was such a huge improvement over the DS and PSP that Sony would'nt have tried to release a second handheld anytime soon. But Nintendo released a handheld which was a small improvement over the PSP, and Sony thought "we can do better".The fact that Sony even managed to release a second handheld is pretty successful I would say. Nintendo usually steam rolls over the competition so badly that they wouldn't even attempt a second handheld.
OneLazyAsian
[QUOTE="_Matt_"]
[QUOTE="The_Pacific"]another failure Handheld from sony IMO. Why get into the handheld race if you just want to come up last every time ? :lol:The_Pacific
wow, not sure if serious. Are you saying the PSP is a failure? If so Im guessing you are also going to call the 360 a failure too? Cos the PSP sdold more than the 360 did, and probabaly more than the 360 ever will
Psp = failure360 = 2nd place and taking huge market share from the ps3. Thats not a failure.
Going by that logic: Nintendo, a company that went pretty much unmatched on the handheld market for nearly two decades loses huge market share to a handheld that had no predecessor.Get your head out of your ass.
No, because releasing a handheld like the Vita means that Sony isn't trying to beat out the 3DS. They're just trying to carve out a market for themselves. The Vita is just not very child-oriented.
No, being in second place doesn't mean your a failure. It can still be a profitable platform for Sony.
Remember guys, as much as we rag on the PSP, it did sell 70 million machines, and it survived the DS. and it's getting a successor.
Something that no other company has been able to do as well as Sony has when in competition with Nintendo in the handheld area.
I wonder where you get that from...The Vita may not outsell the 3ds but it will definitely be a better handheld system.
Jfisch93
[QUOTE="Jfisch93"]I wonder where you get that from... Because it has better hardware. ;)The Vita may not outsell the 3ds but it will definitely be a better handheld system.
charizard1605
I wonder where you get that from... Because it has better hardware. ;) But that wouldn't matter, seeing how that did not help the N64, the Gamecube, the Xbox, the Playstation 3, and perhaps most relevant to this discussion, the PSP. It's the games that count ;)[QUOTE="charizard1605"][QUOTE="Jfisch93"]
The Vita may not outsell the 3ds but it will definitely be a better handheld system.
93BlackHawk93
But that wouldn't matter, seeing how that did not help the N64, the Gamecube, the Xbox, the Playstation 3, and perhaps most relevant to this discussion, the PSP. It's the games that count ;)charizard1605The PS3 and 360 are arguably better systems than the Wii, if software is the basis.
[QUOTE="93BlackHawk93"]Because it has better hardware. ;) But that wouldn't matter, seeing how that did not help the N64, the Gamecube, the Xbox, the Playstation 3, and perhaps most relevant to this discussion, the PSP. It's the games that count ;) No! I want to look at games, not play them! ;)[QUOTE="charizard1605"] I wonder where you get that from...charizard1605
The PS3 and 360 are arguably better systems than the Wii, if software is the basis. Fair enough, I agree with that assessment fully. There really is no arguably involved, the HD twins *are* better systems than the Wii, unless you REALLY like shmups, light shooters and other niche genres of the sort. But the DS vs the PSP... the PSP had superior tech, and that did not help its case one bit. I'm not saying this will be a repeat telecast (on the contrary, I actually believe that the difference between the PS Vita and 3DS will only be a few million units, if at all). I'm just saying, isn't it premature to pronounce one handheld as 'superior' simply based on the tech, when history has given us enough indication that in the handheld market, tech is the last thing that matters?[QUOTE="charizard1605"] But that wouldn't matter, seeing how that did not help the N64, the Gamecube, the Xbox, the Playstation 3, and perhaps most relevant to this discussion, the PSP. It's the games that count ;)shinrabanshou
[QUOTE="charizard1605"][QUOTE="93BlackHawk93"] Because it has better hardware. ;)But that wouldn't matter, seeing how that did not help the N64, the Gamecube, the Xbox, the Playstation 3, and perhaps most relevant to this discussion, the PSP. It's the games that count ;) No! I want to look at games, not play them! ;) I agree. No HD output on the 3DS=automatic fail for Nintendo.93BlackHawk93
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment