If the latest Microsoft rumors are true...they already won this gen

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Pray_to_me
Pray_to_me

4041

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#101 Pray_to_me
Member since 2011 • 4041 Posts

so you gonna have to pay an XBL fee for cable AND Netflix you already paid for? Sounds amazing.

 

TC you're an effing tool.

Avatar image for MonsieurX
MonsieurX

39858

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#102 MonsieurX
Member since 2008 • 39858 Posts
[QUOTE="WitIsWisdom"]

[QUOTE="Miketheman83"]

With a $99 Xbox that can be integrated with your cable box and play any game from the Xbox marketplace. What a great idea that no on saw coming.That alone is going to crush Sony (and probably Apple in the process). That's not even taking into account the Xbox 720. Sony doesn't stand a chance.

I have to admit Microsoft's silence had me a little on edge but if these rumors are true they have really outdone themselves. Brilliant move from Microsoft.

Miketheman83

Except for the fact the rumor was that "$99" Xbox360 mini was "$149" and it sounded as if the 720 was required for it to work... SO basically you are repurchasing a 360... lol

Might as well keep your old 360 and save $150. Sounds a lot like the 32X and similar add ons... we all know what that led too.

That is false. The rumors clearly say that it will be a standalone product sling with the ability to work with the 720. The biggest plus about this rumor that people seem to be overlooking is that this means the 720 will be a gaming console first and foremost, and the always on cable features well be completely optional for an additional cost. Pure brilliance.

Seem the only one that think it's brilliant. Remember of well add-ons console sold\worked well in the past? :roll:
Avatar image for casharmy
casharmy

9388

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#103 casharmy
Member since 2011 • 9388 Posts

[QUOTE="MFDOOM1983"][QUOTE="Miketheman83"] Any game that's on the XBL marketplace. Miketheman83
So, what are you saying? Can you play durango games on the $99 box without durango?

That's not really the point of the console. The point of the console is to integrate cableand play marketplace games.

The POINT of the console is to...wait what...and you are hyping this to us GAMERS...

laughing-puppets-o.gif

thanks for proving my point further.

Avatar image for WitIsWisdom
WitIsWisdom

10394

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#104 WitIsWisdom
Member since 2007 • 10394 Posts

[QUOTE="Miketheman83"][QUOTE="rjdofu"] :lol:, so basically you buy another piece of device $99 (totally useless on its own), stick it onto your 720, to play game available for 2 platform, yep. It provides option which is a good thing for new gamer, but claiming ownage over this? Hahahaha.seanmcloughlin

It works as a standalone console or an add on. Funny to nee that people can't grasp what a brilliant concept this is. When a mother goes into a store to buy a console for her son and sees a $99 console that can be integrated with her TV and play games or a $500 PS4 which one do you think she is going to choose? This thing is going to sell like crazy.

Can the $99 thing play actual next gen games like the PS4 can though?

Not a chance, and it is $149.

Avatar image for WitIsWisdom
WitIsWisdom

10394

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#105 WitIsWisdom
Member since 2007 • 10394 Posts

8Kc6hKP.jpg.

tonitorsi

lmao.. clutch

Avatar image for NEWMAHAY
NEWMAHAY

3824

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#106 NEWMAHAY
Member since 2012 • 3824 Posts
We are considering the next 360 iteration as next-generation?
Avatar image for clyde46
clyde46

49061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#107 clyde46
Member since 2005 • 49061 Posts

[QUOTE="clyde46"][QUOTE="Miketheman83"] Why are you assuming everybody is in your position though? This thread really isn't about you ya know.NFJSupreme

No, your right however my point still stands. There are a few ways to get TV in the UK, all of them require either an integrated tuner or a receiver box. I fail to see where MS is going with this as people who have subscription TV already have a set top box. You are basically paying $99 to get another receiver box.

Its an internet streaming device for your tv. Millions of people have a roku or boxee or some type of dedicated internet streaming device in their home. Microsoft is going after that market by offering a better device. People will buy it to replace their rokus. People will also buy it for BC if they choose to. It is a great business model and will help grow the amount of xbl users. Its really not hard to understand why this could be successful. 

Is it streaming device or an cable box? If people already own a streaming box, why are they going to pay $99 to buy another device that will function in the same way? And lol at the comment about adding to the XBL player pool. The people who are in the market for this device aren't looking to play online games.
Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62017

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#108 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62017 Posts

so you gonna have to pay an XBL fee for cable AND Netflix you already paid for? Sounds amazing.

 

TC you're an effing tool.

Pray_to_me

The rumours are that you hook your cable, via HDMI, through the 720 companion model, and then to your TV. Allowing it to add a "Smart TV" like overlay. You can probably pay the Gold fee (assuming it works the same way as this gen) and access all of the 360 On-Demand services as well.

Avatar image for Miketheman83
Miketheman83

3156

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#109 Miketheman83
Member since 2010 • 3156 Posts

[QUOTE="Miketheman83"][QUOTE="MFDOOM1983"]So, what are you saying? Can you play durango games on the $99 box without durango?casharmy

That's not really the point of the console. The point of the console is to integrate cableand play marketplace games.

The POINT of the console is to...wait what...and you are hyping this to us GAMERS...

laughing-puppets-o.gif

thanks for proving my point further.

Love how you ignored the part about it playing marketplace games :lol:
Avatar image for Miketheman83
Miketheman83

3156

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#110 Miketheman83
Member since 2010 • 3156 Posts
[QUOTE="NFJSupreme"]

[QUOTE="clyde46"]

Its an internet streaming device for your tv. Millions of people have a roku or boxee or some type of dedicated internet streaming device in their home. Microsoft is going after that market by offering a better device. People will buy it to replace their rokus. People will also buy it for BC if they choose to. It is a great business model and will help grow the amount of xbl users. Its really not hard to understand why this could be successful. 

clyde46
Is it streaming device or an cable box? If people already own a streaming box, why are they going to pay $99 to buy another device that will function in the same way? And lol at the comment about adding to the XBL player pool. The people who are in the market for this device aren't looking to play online games.

We are considering the next 360 iteration as next-generation?NEWMAHAY
It's not a 360 at all. It's more like Apple tv except it has an edge by being able to play games also.
Avatar image for Pray_to_me
Pray_to_me

4041

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#111 Pray_to_me
Member since 2011 • 4041 Posts

[QUOTE="Pray_to_me"]

so you gonna have to pay an XBL fee for cable AND Netflix you already paid for? Sounds amazing.

 

TC you're an effing tool.

lundy86_4

The rumours are that you hook your cable, via HDMI, through the 720 companion model, and then to your TV. Allowing it to add a "Smart TV" like overlay. You can probably pay the Gold fee (assuming it works the same way as this gen) and access all of the 360 On-Demand services as well.

Who gives a sh!t

Avatar image for MonsieurX
MonsieurX

39858

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#112 MonsieurX
Member since 2008 • 39858 Posts
[QUOTE="Miketheman83"][QUOTE="clyde46"][QUOTE="NFJSupreme"] Is it streaming device or an cable box? If people already own a streaming box, why are they going to pay $99 to buy another device that will function in the same way? And lol at the comment about adding to the XBL player pool. The people who are in the market for this device aren't looking to play online games.

We are considering the next 360 iteration as next-generation?NEWMAHAY
It's not a 360 at all. It's more like Apple tv except it has an edge by being able to play games also.

And people would buy it to play last gen xbl games? :lol:
Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62017

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#113 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62017 Posts

[QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

[QUOTE="Pray_to_me"]

so you gonna have to pay an XBL fee for cable AND Netflix you already paid for? Sounds amazing.

 

TC you're an effing tool.

Pray_to_me

The rumours are that you hook your cable, via HDMI, through the 720 companion model, and then to your TV. Allowing it to add a "Smart TV" like overlay. You can probably pay the Gold fee (assuming it works the same way as this gen) and access all of the 360 On-Demand services as well.

Who gives a sh!t

:lol:

You called TC a tool, whilst completely assuming something, when you clearly didn't have all the information. Well done.

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62017

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#114 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62017 Posts

And people would buy it to play last gen xbl games? :lol:MonsieurX

Do you remember the whining when BC was removed from the PS3?

Avatar image for 2Chalupas
2Chalupas

7286

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#115 2Chalupas
Member since 2009 • 7286 Posts

[QUOTE="Pray_to_me"]

so you gonna have to pay an XBL fee for cable AND Netflix you already paid for? Sounds amazing.

 

TC you're an effing tool.

lundy86_4

The rumours are that you hook your cable, via HDMI, through the 720 companion model, and then to your TV. Allowing it to add a "Smart TV" like overlay. You can probably pay the Gold fee (assuming it works the same way as this gen) and access all of the 360 On-Demand services as well.


"Smart-TV" like interface. 

So basically if I have a smart TV, and a cable box, then the "compainion box-XBOX" is like... totally useless. Does this box do anything but block my already paid-for services behind a paywall? :lol:

Avatar image for NFJSupreme
NFJSupreme

6605

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#116 NFJSupreme
Member since 2005 • 6605 Posts

[QUOTE="NFJSupreme"]

[QUOTE="clyde46"] No, your right however my point still stands. There are a few ways to get TV in the UK, all of them require either an integrated tuner or a receiver box. I fail to see where MS is going with this as people who have subscription TV already have a set top box. You are basically paying $99 to get another receiver box. clyde46

Its an internet streaming device for your tv. Millions of people have a roku or boxee or some type of dedicated internet streaming device in their home. Microsoft is going after that market by offering a better device. People will buy it to replace their rokus. People will also buy it for BC if they choose to. It is a great business model and will help grow the amount of xbl users. Its really not hard to understand why this could be successful. 

Is it streaming device or an cable box? If people already own a streaming box, why are they going to pay $99 to buy another device that will function in the same way? And lol at the comment about adding to the XBL player pool. The people who are in the market for this device aren't looking to play online games.

 

I would get one just to replace my girlfriend's roku because it would be a better device. Also xbl is about more than playing games. People will be buying movies, music and apps on their all under the xbl ecosystem. My only question about this new plan is will they still charge for xbl?  Non gamers aren't going to be willing to pay to use a streaming device because all of them are free. So I'm guessing part of this new plan is removing the monthly fee or letting people stream movies, use TV apps, and make purchases for free but charge for the gaming stuff. Not sure how they will execute the plan but we don't know much about the rebranding they are doing with Xbox and xbl. But if they pull it of they could see huge profits. 

Avatar image for Miketheman83
Miketheman83

3156

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#117 Miketheman83
Member since 2010 • 3156 Posts

[QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

[QUOTE="Pray_to_me"]

so you gonna have to pay an XBL fee for cable AND Netflix you already paid for? Sounds amazing.

 

TC you're an effing tool.

2Chalupas

The rumours are that you hook your cable, via HDMI, through the 720 companion model, and then to your TV. Allowing it to add a "Smart TV" like overlay. You can probably pay the Gold fee (assuming it works the same way as this gen) and access all of the 360 On-Demand services as well.


"Smart-TV" like interface. 

So basically if I have a smart TV, and a cable box, then the "compainion box-XBOX" is like... totally useless. Does this box do anything but block my already paid-for services behind a paywall? :lol:

Those are a lot of ifs there buddy, and you're disregarding that it has the edge by being able to access the XBL marketplace.
Avatar image for MonsieurX
MonsieurX

39858

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#118 MonsieurX
Member since 2008 • 39858 Posts

It's going to be able to play anything on the XBL marketplace, and yes, I think they will. Like I said, this thing alone will compete with the PS4, and that's not even factoring in the 720. Sony is in serious trouble.

Miketheman83

Anything on the marketplace,even 720 games? Doubt it highly.

And those people already played them on their 360...don't see the point

M$ is in serious trouble

Avatar image for 2Chalupas
2Chalupas

7286

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#119 2Chalupas
Member since 2009 • 7286 Posts

[QUOTE="2Chalupas"]

[QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

The rumours are that you hook your cable, via HDMI, through the 720 companion model, and then to your TV. Allowing it to add a "Smart TV" like overlay. You can probably pay the Gold fee (assuming it works the same way as this gen) and access all of the 360 On-Demand services as well.

Miketheman83


"Smart-TV" like interface. 

So basically if I have a smart TV, and a cable box, then the "compainion box-XBOX" is like... totally useless. Does this box do anything but block my already paid-for services behind a paywall? :lol:

Those are a lot of ifs there buddy, and you're disregarding that it has the edge by being able to access the XBL marketplace.

There is only 1 if ;), and I do have already have a smart TV and external cable box. So I guess that makes the XBOX useless. 

The *ONLY* interest level to me is if it can actaully replace the cable box 100%. But I have zero interest in any device that needs to "piggyback" my cable box. 

Avatar image for WitIsWisdom
WitIsWisdom

10394

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#120 WitIsWisdom
Member since 2007 • 10394 Posts

[QUOTE="WitIsWisdom"]

[QUOTE="Miketheman83"]

With a $99 Xbox that can be integrated with your cable box and play any game from the Xbox marketplace. What a great idea that no on saw coming.That alone is going to crush Sony (and probably Apple in the process). That's not even taking into account the Xbox 720. Sony doesn't stand a chance.

I have to admit Microsoft's silence had me a little on edge but if these rumors are true they have really outdone themselves. Brilliant move from Microsoft.

Miketheman83

Except for the fact the rumor was that "$99" Xbox360 mini was "$149" and it sounded as if the 720 was required for it to work... SO basically you are repurchasing a 360... lol

Might as well keep your old 360 and save $150. Sounds a lot like the 32X and similar add ons... we all know what that led too.

That is false. The rumors clearly say that it will be a standalone product along with the ability to work with the 720. The biggest plus about this rumor that people seem to be overlooking is that this means the 720 will be a gaming console first and foremost, and the always on cable features well be completely optional for an additional cost. Pure brilliance.

NO, it CLEARLY states that it doesn't have a disc drive but you can put a disc in the 720 to play the game through the add on device. Meaning it is a $150 360 with less features and is little more than an add on. It's only going to be able to play XBL games without being connected to the 720. If standalone product to you means that it loses over half of its functionality (the ability to play disc based... ANYTHING) then you can go ahead and buy another $150 360. I will not however purchase a $150 PS4 add on that plays PS3 games... why? For one, Gakai, and two, I WILL KEEP MY PS3.

"Always on" cable at an additional cost... lol. I'll keep my provider... thanks though.

So they will charge for that service, and live, and an additional add on in which you already have with the 360 only with less capabilities. Sounds like quite the deal... lol

Have fun with that.

Still sounds an awful lot like the 32X etc. etc. fiascos.

I wish Microsoft good luck, but history shows that these type of endeavors do not usually work out so well. If it does, then that is great. If the cable portion kicks ass, that is great. I am not a fan boy of any console or company. I am just highly skeptical especially without any formal announcements. The fact that the 720 unveiling was pushed back for at least a month seems odd to tsay the least. It is Microsoft feeling the heat right now... not the other way around.

Avatar image for NFJSupreme
NFJSupreme

6605

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#121 NFJSupreme
Member since 2005 • 6605 Posts

[QUOTE="Miketheman83"] It's going to be able to play anything on the XBL marketplace, and yes, I think they will. Like I said, this thing alone will compete with the PS4, and that's not even factoring in the 720. Sony is in serious trouble.

MonsieurX

Anything on the marketplace,even 720 games? Doubt it highly.

And those people already played them on their 360...don't see the point

M$ is in serious trouble

The mini isn't targetting core gamers. Once you realize that it is easy to see what they are trying to do. 

Avatar image for Miketheman83
Miketheman83

3156

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#122 Miketheman83
Member since 2010 • 3156 Posts

[QUOTE="Miketheman83"] It's going to be able to play anything on the XBL marketplace, and yes, I think they will. Like I said, this thing alone will compete with the PS4, and that's not even factoring in the 720. Sony is in serious trouble.

MonsieurX

Anything on the marketplace,even 720 games? Doubt it highly.

And those people already played them on their 360...don't see the point

M$ is in serious trouble

How do you figure? The PS4 is going to have to compete with the Xbox mini AND the 720. In a couple years Sony's gaming division will be a thing of the past.
Avatar image for 2Chalupas
2Chalupas

7286

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#123 2Chalupas
Member since 2009 • 7286 Posts

[QUOTE="2Chalupas"]

[QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

The rumours are that you hook your cable, via HDMI, through the 720 companion model, and then to your TV. Allowing it to add a "Smart TV" like overlay. You can probably pay the Gold fee (assuming it works the same way as this gen) and access all of the 360 On-Demand services as well.

lundy86_4


"Smart-TV" like interface. 

So basically if I have a smart TV, and a cable box, then the "compainion box-XBOX" is like... totally useless. Does this box do anything but block my already paid-for services behind a paywall? :lol:

You realize that this device isn't aimed at  every single person on the planet, right? It's aimed at people looking to utilize the features of the console, much like any system released in a generation.

You're assuming it's blocking your cable behind a pay-wall (I assume that's what you are saying). We actually don't know how the paid services will work, or if there will actually be any, outside of potentially using the device for existing on-demand 360 services.

I know MS is planning it behind a paywall because there is NO PROFIT in a $99 box if there is no subscription. They wouldn't make such a box. Does anyone honestly think MS is interested in "competing" with the likes of Roku for market share? MS, after suckering gamers for years with XBOX Live fees, obviously has pie in the sky ambition thinking they can get serious subscription revenues from the TV market.

How they plan on extracting those revenues with existing cable operators in the picture, and with "free" streaming devices like Roku, I have no idea.

 

Avatar image for Miketheman83
Miketheman83

3156

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#124 Miketheman83
Member since 2010 • 3156 Posts

[QUOTE="Miketheman83"]

[QUOTE="WitIsWisdom"]

Except for the fact the rumor was that "$99" Xbox360 mini was "$149" and it sounded as if the 720 was required for it to work... SO basically you are repurchasing a 360... lol

Might as well keep your old 360 and save $150. Sounds a lot like the 32X and similar add ons... we all know what that led too.

WitIsWisdom

That is false. The rumors clearly say that it will be a standalone product along with the ability to work with the 720. The biggest plus about this rumor that people seem to be overlooking is that this means the 720 will be a gaming console first and foremost, and the always on cable features well be completely optional for an additional cost. Pure brilliance.

NO, it CLEARLY states that it doesn't have a disc drive but you can put a disc in the 720 to play the game through the add on device. Meaning it is a $150 360 with less features and is little more than an add on. It's only going to be able to play XBL games without being connected to the 720. If standalone product to you means that it loses over half of its functionality (the ability to play disc based... ANYTHING) then you can go ahead and buy another $150 360. I will not however purchase a $150 PS4 add on that plays PS3 games... why? For one, Gakai, and two, I WILL KEEP MY PS3.

"Always on" cable at an additional cost... lol. I'll keep my provider... thanks though.

So they will charge for that service, and live, and an additional add on in which you already have with the 360 only with less capabilities. Sounds like quite the deal... lol

Have fun with that.

Still sounds an awful lot like the 32X etc. etc. fiascos.

I wish Microsoft good luck, but history shows that these type of endeavors do not usually work out so well. If it does, then that is great. If the cable portion kicks ass, that is great. I am not a fan boy of any console or company. I am just highly skeptical especially without any formal announcements. The fact that the 720 unveiling was pushed back for at least a month seems odd to tsay the least. It is Microsoft feeling the heat right now... not the other way around.

It doesn't have a disk drive because it doesn't need one. It's going to be always connected and work without the 720.
Avatar image for MonsieurX
MonsieurX

39858

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#125 MonsieurX
Member since 2008 • 39858 Posts
[QUOTE="MonsieurX"]

[QUOTE="Miketheman83"] It's going to be able to play anything on the XBL marketplace, and yes, I think they will. Like I said, this thing alone will compete with the PS4, and that's not even factoring in the 720. Sony is in serious trouble.

Miketheman83

Anything on the marketplace,even 720 games? Doubt it highly.

And those people already played them on their 360...don't see the point

M$ is in serious trouble

How do you figure? The PS4 is going to have to compete with the Xbox mini AND the 720. In a couple years Sony's gaming division will be a thing of the past.

Forgot the 2 other points? :lol:
Avatar image for Krelian-co
Krelian-co

13274

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#126 Krelian-co
Member since 2006 • 13274 Posts

[QUOTE="MonsieurX"][QUOTE="Miketheman83"] I think the biggest plus to these rumors is the fact that the 720 will be a dedicated gaming console and the always online, cable integration will be optional, thanks to the mini. That means that the price of the 720 won't be excessive and people can have the added features if they want to pay for them.The mini will be a pretty cool option as a standalone device also.Miketheman83
Always online is far from a plus :|

If you read the article I showed you, the rumors that the 720 was always online came from the Xbox mini. According to the article the 720 will not be always online or block used games. If you want to use the mini it has to be always connected.

they haven't denied the rumor, many sites are reporting the same and even orthon who worked for them was defending it. At this moment the only thing left is confirmation.

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62017

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#127 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62017 Posts

I know MS is planning it behind a paywall because there is NO PROFIT in a $99 box if there is no subscription. They wouldn't make such a box. Does anyone honestly think MS is interested in "competing" with the likes of Roku for market share? MS, after suckering gamers for years with XBOX Live fees, obviously has pie in the sky ambition thinking they can get serious subscription revenues from the TV market.

How they plan on extracting those revenues with existing cable operators in the picture, and with "free" streaming devices like Roku, I have no idea.

 

2Chalupas

No, you don't know, at all. I've given a reasonable alternative to actually having you pay to unlock overlay features for your cable. That would be by having actual internet streaming services -- which are currently on the 360, and potentially more -- be unlocked with a Gold membership, or a newer alternative. Furthermore, there would be profit in the selling of the unit.

I understand this thread is based on rumours, but you are assuming  way too much. There is no indication that it will be  entirely  locked behind a Gold-type membership fee.

Avatar image for clyde46
clyde46

49061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#128 clyde46
Member since 2005 • 49061 Posts

[QUOTE="2Chalupas"]

I know MS is planning it behind a paywall because there is NO PROFIT in a $99 box if there is no subscription. They wouldn't make such a box. Does anyone honestly think MS is interested in "competing" with the likes of Roku for market share? MS, after suckering gamers for years with XBOX Live fees, obviously has pie in the sky ambition thinking they can get serious subscription revenues from the TV market.

How they plan on extracting those revenues with existing cable operators in the picture, and with "free" streaming devices like Roku, I have no idea.

 

lundy86_4

No, you don't know, at all. I've given a reasonable alternative to actually having you pay to unlock overlay features for your cable. That would be by having actual internet streaming services -- which are currently on the 360, and potentially more -- be unlocked with a Gold membership, or a newer alternative. Furthermore, there would be profit in the selling of the unit.

I understand this thread is based on rumours, but you are assuming  way too much. There is no indication that it will be  entirely  locked behind a Gold-type membership fee.

I believe the only service that is not locked behind the XBL Gold wall is the BBC iPlayer.
Avatar image for JamDev
JamDev

992

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#129 JamDev
Member since 2013 • 992 Posts
How many 360 owners are seriously thinking of buying this? I'm sure as hell not.
Avatar image for NFJSupreme
NFJSupreme

6605

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#130 NFJSupreme
Member since 2005 • 6605 Posts

[QUOTE="Miketheman83"]

[QUOTE="WitIsWisdom"]

Except for the fact the rumor was that "$99" Xbox360 mini was "$149" and it sounded as if the 720 was required for it to work... SO basically you are repurchasing a 360... lol

Might as well keep your old 360 and save $150. Sounds a lot like the 32X and similar add ons... we all know what that led too.

WitIsWisdom

That is false. The rumors clearly say that it will be a standalone product along with the ability to work with the 720. The biggest plus about this rumor that people seem to be overlooking is that this means the 720 will be a gaming console first and foremost, and the always on cable features well be completely optional for an additional cost. Pure brilliance.

NO, it CLEARLY states that it doesn't have a disc drive but you can put a disc in the 720 to play the game through the add on device. Meaning it is a $150 360 with less features and is little more than an add on. It's only going to be able to play XBL games without being connected to the 720. If standalone product to you means that it loses over half of its functionality (the ability to play disc based... ANYTHING) then you can go ahead and buy another $150 360. I will not however purchase a $150 PS4 add on that plays PS3 games... why? For one, Gakai, and two, I WILL KEEP MY PS3.

"Always on" cable at an additional cost... lol. I'll keep my provider... thanks though.

So they will charge for that service, and live, and an additional add on in which you already have with the 360 only with less capabilities. Sounds like quite the deal... lol

Have fun with that.

Still sounds an awful lot like the 32X etc. etc. fiascos.

I wish Microsoft good luck, but history shows that these type of endeavors do not usually work out so well. If it does, then that is great. If the cable portion kicks ass, that is great. I am not a fan boy of any console or company. I am just highly skeptical especially without any formal announcements. The fact that the 720 unveiling was pushed back for at least a month seems odd to tsay the least. It is Microsoft feeling the heat right now... not the other way around.

Read the leak again. It is a stand alone device whose core functionality has nothing to do with the Durango.  The only thing it does that has to do with the Durango is let it play 360 games. 

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62017

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#131 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62017 Posts

I believe the only service that is not locked behind the XBL Gold wall is the BBC iPlayer. clyde46

Not too sure. Still, that's largely my point. I expect many services this gen to remain behind a Gold-type membership. Speculating on MS actually making you pay a monthly fee for accessing the overlay features is just 100% speculation at this point. I'm not saying it won't happen, naturally.

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62017

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#132 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62017 Posts

How many 360 owners are seriously thinking of buying this? I'm sure as hell not.JamDev

Not really. Potentially for 360 BC, but that would largely be it.

Avatar image for clyde46
clyde46

49061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#133 clyde46
Member since 2005 • 49061 Posts

[QUOTE="clyde46"]I believe the only service that is not locked behind the XBL Gold wall is the BBC iPlayer. lundy86_4

Not too sure. Still, that's largely my point. I expect many services this gen to remain behind a Gold-type membership. Speculating on MS actually making you pay a monthly fee for accessing the overlay features is just 100% speculation at this point. I'm not saying it won't happen, naturally.

There is a SKY app on the 360 but you need to be an XBL gold member and a SKY customer I believe.
Avatar image for Blabadon
Blabadon

33030

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 1

#134 Blabadon
Member since 2008 • 33030 Posts
[QUOTE="MFDOOM1983"]I thought the $99 xbox was just a 360.timbers_WSU
No. Microsoft said it was gonna extend into the 720 but they have not announced the subscription price yet.

They haven't said anything lol
Avatar image for Miketheman83
Miketheman83

3156

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#135 Miketheman83
Member since 2010 • 3156 Posts
[QUOTE="NEWMAHAY"][QUOTE="Miketheman83"][QUOTE="clyde46"]
We are considering the next 360 iteration as next-generation?NEWMAHAY
It's not a 360 at all. It's more like Apple tv except it has an edge by being able to play games also.

its not a 720. It isn't a next-generation console. Its a cable-tv set with the ability to play 360 games.

It is not a 360. It is an Apple tv with the ability to access the xbl marketplace. It is also designed to work with the 720. Technically it is a next gen console.
Avatar image for MonsieurX
MonsieurX

39858

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#136 MonsieurX
Member since 2008 • 39858 Posts

[QUOTE="NEWMAHAY"][QUOTE="Miketheman83"] It's not a 360 at all. It's more like Apple tv except it has an edge by being able to play games also.Miketheman83
its not a 720. It isn't a next-generation console. Its a cable-tv set with the ability to play 360 games.

It is not a 360. It is an Apple tv with the ability to access the xbl marketplace. It is also designed to work with the 720. Technically it is a next gen console.

How does it make it a next gen console technically?

1)Playing old XBL games

2)Cable

= next gen?

Avatar image for Miketheman83
Miketheman83

3156

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#137 Miketheman83
Member since 2010 • 3156 Posts

[QUOTE="WitIsWisdom"]

[QUOTE="Miketheman83"] That is false. The rumors clearly say that it will be a standalone product along with the ability to work with the 720. The biggest plus about this rumor that people seem to be overlooking is that this means the 720 will be a gaming console first and foremost, and the always on cable features well be completely optional for an additional cost. Pure brilliance.

NFJSupreme

NO, it CLEARLY states that it doesn't have a disc drive but you can put a disc in the 720 to play the game through the add on device. Meaning it is a $150 360 with less features and is little more than an add on. It's only going to be able to play XBL games without being connected to the 720. If standalone product to you means that it loses over half of its functionality (the ability to play disc based... ANYTHING) then you can go ahead and buy another $150 360. I will not however purchase a $150 PS4 add on that plays PS3 games... why? For one, Gakai, and two, I WILL KEEP MY PS3.

"Always on" cable at an additional cost... lol. I'll keep my provider... thanks though.

So they will charge for that service, and live, and an additional add on in which you already have with the 360 only with less capabilities. Sounds like quite the deal... lol

Have fun with that.

Still sounds an awful lot like the 32X etc. etc. fiascos.

I wish Microsoft good luck, but history shows that these type of endeavors do not usually work out so well. If it does, then that is great. If the cable portion kicks ass, that is great. I am not a fan boy of any console or company. I am just highly skeptical especially without any formal announcements. The fact that the 720 unveiling was pushed back for at least a month seems odd to tsay the least. It is Microsoft feeling the heat right now... not the other way around.

Read the leak again. It is a stand alone device whose core functionality has nothing to do with the Durango.  The only thing it does that has to do with the Durango is let it play 360 games. 

And the internet television services.
Avatar image for NFJSupreme
NFJSupreme

6605

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#138 NFJSupreme
Member since 2005 • 6605 Posts

How many 360 owners are seriously thinking of buying this? I'm sure as hell not.JamDev

If it delivers as a kick ass internet streaming device then yes ill get one to replace my girlfriend's roku. 

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62017

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#139 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62017 Posts

[QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

[QUOTE="clyde46"]I believe the only service that is not locked behind the XBL Gold wall is the BBC iPlayer. clyde46

Not too sure. Still, that's largely my point. I expect many services this gen to remain behind a Gold-type membership. Speculating on MS actually making you pay a monthly fee for accessing the overlay features is just 100% speculation at this point. I'm not saying it won't happen, naturally.

There is a SKY app on the 360 but you need to be an XBL gold member and a SKY customer I believe.

That's kinda sh*tty. Especially given it being free on numerous other devices. 

Man, I miss Sky. Service providers here are sh*t.

Avatar image for clyde46
clyde46

49061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#140 clyde46
Member since 2005 • 49061 Posts

[QUOTE="clyde46"][QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

Not too sure. Still, that's largely my point. I expect many services this gen to remain behind a Gold-type membership. Speculating on MS actually making you pay a monthly fee for accessing the overlay features is just 100% speculation at this point. I'm not saying it won't happen, naturally.

lundy86_4

There is a SKY app on the 360 but you need to be an XBL gold member and a SKY customer I believe.

That's kinda sh*tty. Especially given it being free on numerous other devices. 

Man, I miss Sky. Service providers here are sh*t.

We've just moved to SKY from BT. The guy on the phone gave us a 6 month half price deal on phone, TV and broadband as well as 2 months free access to SKY Movies.
Avatar image for Miketheman83
Miketheman83

3156

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#141 Miketheman83
Member since 2010 • 3156 Posts

[QUOTE="Miketheman83"][QUOTE="NEWMAHAY"] its not a 720. It isn't a next-generation console. Its a cable-tv set with the ability to play 360 games. MonsieurX

It is not a 360. It is an Apple tv with the ability to access the xbl marketplace. It is also designed to work with the 720. Technically it is a next gen console.

How does it make it a next gen console technically?

1)Playing old XBL games

2)Cable

= next gen?

It is a console released this gen with features no other console has ever had and it is designed to work directly with the 720, which is a next gen console.
Avatar image for Miketheman83
Miketheman83

3156

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#142 Miketheman83
Member since 2010 • 3156 Posts

[QUOTE="Miketheman83"][QUOTE="wazzap76"] You have zero proof it's done locally.wazzap76
That's what the Xbox mini is for :lol:

Prove it.

As this thread states it's a rumor at this point. Are you denying the existence of an Xbox mini at all? If you haven't yet you should read this article it will explain a lot

www.vgleaks.com/microsoft-xbox-roadmap-2013/

Avatar image for WitIsWisdom
WitIsWisdom

10394

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#143 WitIsWisdom
Member since 2007 • 10394 Posts

[QUOTE="WitIsWisdom"]

[QUOTE="Miketheman83"] That is false. The rumors clearly say that it will be a standalone product along with the ability to work with the 720. The biggest plus about this rumor that people seem to be overlooking is that this means the 720 will be a gaming console first and foremost, and the always on cable features well be completely optional for an additional cost. Pure brilliance.

RR360DD

NO, it CLEARLY states that it doesn't have a disc drive but you can put a disc in the 720 to play the game through the add on device. Meaning it is a $150 360 with less features and is little more than an add on. It's only going to be able to play XBL games without being connected to the 720. If standalone product to you means that it loses over half of its functionality (the ability to play disc based... ANYTHING) then you can go ahead and buy another $150 360. I will not however purchase a $150 PS4 add on that plays PS3 games... why? For one, Gakai, and two, I WILL KEEP MY PS3.

"Always on" cable at an additional cost... lol. I'll keep my provider... thanks though.

So they will charge for that service, and live, and an additional add on in which you already have with the 360 only with less capabilities. Sounds like quite the deal... lol

Have fun with that.

Still sounds an awful lot like the 32X etc. etc. fiascos.

I wish Microsoft good luck, but history shows that these type of endeavors do not usually work out so well. If it does, then that is great. If the cable portion kicks ass, that is great. I am not a fan boy of any console or company. I am just highly skeptical especially without any formal announcements. The fact that the 720 unveiling was pushed back for at least a month seems odd to tsay the least. It is Microsoft feeling the heat right now... not the other way around.

Have you forgotten that XBL sells retail games too? Its a digital only Xbox 360 that plays all games and if you already have a 360 then its not aimed at you.

Its not an add-on. Its its own individual device.

So no, it doesn't sound anything like the 32X. Its seems this rumour is beyond some peoples comprehension LOL

ps. Firstly, lol at streaming games of gaikai, and secondly, don't expect it to be free.

Ok... and?

Most people who want a 360 already own one. Those that want to get one of these things... that is just fine. Also, go ahead and download (and buy all over again) all the games you already own to your hearts content. No disc drive means you will never truly own the media. It IS an add on because it loses functionality without its parent console the 720. Its "standalone" features lack in comparison. This device main selling point will be for people who want to have backwards compatability with their 720. People who buy it for a "standalone" device are pretty dense. My comparison to the 32X was a little off, it is MUCH more like the Sega channel :P My comprehension is above that of your average bear by the way, so good try on that aspect.

PS. I own all the PS3 games I want already, and I probabkly wont use gaikai anyways... that is why I will still have my PS3.

Avatar image for Miketheman83
Miketheman83

3156

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#144 Miketheman83
Member since 2010 • 3156 Posts
[QUOTE="Miketheman83"][QUOTE="MonsieurX"]How does it make it a next gen console technically?

1)Playing old XBL games

2)Cable

= next gen?

MonsieurX
It is a console released this gen with features no other console has ever had and it is designed to work directly with the 720, which is a next gen console.

Playing last gen xbl games = last game Deal with it :lol:

I'm just saying it's a very smart move from Microsoft. They have an affordable Apple tv with games integration and this also means the 720 will be a pure game console with optional backwards compatibility and optional cable services. People that don't want the BC or cable stuff don't have to pay for it. .People that want all the features will buy both. It's a brilliant move. Sony should be very scared right now.
Avatar image for MonsieurX
MonsieurX

39858

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#145 MonsieurX
Member since 2008 • 39858 Posts
[QUOTE="Miketheman83"][QUOTE="MonsieurX"][QUOTE="Miketheman83"] It is a console released this gen with features no other console has ever had and it is designed to work directly with the 720, which is a next gen console.

Playing last gen xbl games = last game Deal with it :lol:

I'm just saying it's a very smart move from Microsoft. They have an affordable Apple tv with games integration and this also means the 720 will be a pure game console with optional backwards compatibility and optional cable services. People that don't want the BC or cable stuff don't have to pay for it. .People that want all the features will buy both. It's a brilliant move. Sony should be very scared right now.

Don't see how it's brilliant,they should just integrate it with the 720 already
Avatar image for Miketheman83
Miketheman83

3156

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#146 Miketheman83
Member since 2010 • 3156 Posts
[QUOTE="MonsieurX"][QUOTE="Miketheman83"][QUOTE="MonsieurX"] Playing last gen xbl games = last game Deal with it :lol:

I'm just saying it's a very smart move from Microsoft. They have an affordable Apple tv with games integration and this also means the 720 will be a pure game console with optional backwards compatibility and optional cable services. People that don't want the BC or cable stuff don't have to pay for it. .People that want all the features will buy both. It's a brilliant move. Sony should be very scared right now.

Don't see how it's brilliant,they should just integrate it with the 720 already

That would drive up the cost of the 720 by adding features some people might not want. They are giving consumers options. Consumers love options.
Avatar image for NEWMAHAY
NEWMAHAY

3824

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#147 NEWMAHAY
Member since 2012 • 3824 Posts

[QUOTE="NEWMAHAY"][QUOTE="Miketheman83"] No sh1t it's not. That's what the Xbox mini is for according to rumors.Miketheman83
Buying another xbox = backwards compatible ?

Paying to use gakai = Backwards compatible?

I didn't say that. You did.

 

We don't even know if that is true in the first place.

Avatar image for 2Chalupas
2Chalupas

7286

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#148 2Chalupas
Member since 2009 • 7286 Posts

[QUOTE="2Chalupas"]

I know MS is planning it behind a paywall because there is NO PROFIT in a $99 box if there is no subscription. They wouldn't make such a box. Does anyone honestly think MS is interested in "competing" with the likes of Roku for market share? MS, after suckering gamers for years with XBOX Live fees, obviously has pie in the sky ambition thinking they can get serious subscription revenues from the TV market.

How they plan on extracting those revenues with existing cable operators in the picture, and with "free" streaming devices like Roku, I have no idea.

 

lundy86_4

No, you don't know, at all. I've given a reasonable alternative to actually having you pay to unlock overlay features for your cable. That would be by having actual internet streaming services -- which are currently on the 360, and potentially more -- be unlocked with a Gold membership, or a newer alternative. Furthermore, there would be profit in the selling of the unit.

I understand this thread is based on rumours, but you are assuming  way too much. There is no indication that it will be  entirely  locked behind a Gold-type membership fee.

LOL. I'm living in the reality how MS looks at it's customers now, and the type of high margin business MS shareholders are accustomed too.

You are the one speculating that all of a sudden this stuff will not be behind the Gold/paywall structure. 

I see this talk of MS "taking over the living room". That's just pie in the sky nonsense, and my gut tells me they really think they can extract alot of revenues and fees out of this business. It's a simple translation to $$$. They are not going to earn substantial profits off of a $99 box unless there are heavy fees attached. Roku is a small company, so MS could literally take over 100% of Roku market share and the hardware sales wouldn't even make a dent for a company the size of MS. Microsoft NEEDS subscription fees on top of hardware sales or it simply isn't a viable business for thier shareholders. 

MS doesn't have CONTENT. So what exactly are they selling us here? If they drop the paywall that would certainly be a good thing for customers, but then it also means MS dropped their ambitions down a notch. There won't be enough money in it for them to please shareholders long term, and certainly it won't even put a dent in their overall business (which is likely to be a declining business with the collapse of the PC market and Windows). So my take is this whole process will end up being Zune 2.0 - and in 5 years time MS will be in some major trouble (not unlike what Sony has gone through). 

Avatar image for Bazooka_4ME
Bazooka_4ME

2540

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#149 Bazooka_4ME
Member since 2008 • 2540 Posts
First, MS charges people online now they're going to charge you with your "already" paid cable box on top of it. Wow you lemmings are the dumbest consumers that's plaguing the gaming community with stupidity.
Avatar image for wazzap76
wazzap76

293

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#150 wazzap76
Member since 2012 • 293 Posts

[QUOTE="wazzap76"][QUOTE="Miketheman83"] Add this thread states it's a rumor at this point. Ate you denying the existence of an Xbox mini at all? If you haven't yet you should read this article it will explain a lot www.vgleaks.com/microsoft-xbox-roadmap-2013/NFJSupreme

I'm not denying anything I'm saying you have zero proof the mini will play games locally and not through the cloud.

 

i don't know if you are trolling or just slow.  The vgleaks article clearly explains that you will be able to play 360 games on your durango when it is connected to the xbox mini.  It's not a difficult concept to understand.

So it only plays games when connected to a 720? Making it a cable box when by itself? I really don't see it selling like hot cakes when almost everyone in the market if or a new Xbox already owns a 360. So to make it clear it's a cable/gimped 360 box that only uses half of its features until you connect it to their more expensive device. Sounds unappealing. A side note. No hard drive? Are they going to sell a separate DVr for it? This device keeps sounding worse and worse.