Important Update to the GameSpot Community Code of Conduct

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for cakeorrdeath
cakeorrdeath

19079

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#501 cakeorrdeath
Member since 2006 • 19079 Posts
[QUOTE="Jakandsigz"][QUOTE="cakeorrdeath"][QUOTE="Jakandsigz"] BULLSHIT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!! You look at those posts and are BAFFLED as to how it's BS? The fact the guy I quoted was continuously in that same thread doing the same BS for no reason? What kind of deluded piece of crap are you? This forum is screwed. Are is reading not a strong suit of yours? Need help with the words?

You are treading thin ice...

I'm sorry, so you won't be kind enough to show me where I got modded for with good reason? Ok fine, can you give me a link to someone who would please? I mean I am asking you nicely. I mean what is the point of being told I can appeal or have someone check on the moderation, if when i did so I am on thin ice at someones discretionary? So again, just being very nice here, someone to help me understand, how my mod was relevant.

Raise a thread in ask the mods and I will gladly talk you though it. This thread is not the appropriate place for it.
Avatar image for CaseyWegner
CaseyWegner

70152

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#502 CaseyWegner
Member since 2002 • 70152 Posts

[QUOTE="CaseyWegner"]how do you pretend to be a fake mod? anyway, the irony is there again. you'll see...if you're still around.foxhound_fox
Walk, talk and act like a mod without the tags.

that would be more along the lines of acting like a fake mod. how would one pretend?

Avatar image for Jakandsigz
Jakandsigz

6341

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#503 Jakandsigz
Member since 2013 • 6341 Posts

I will attempt to not get in trouble but I am reporting everyone. Anytime someone says or does something I am hitting the button. Something tells me trolls like heil68 will not get in any trouble. But if I say something like "Wow, Killer Instinct looks great!" AI am getting a 7 day suspension.....Oh it will happen. I am certain.
Well off to try and talk about games in System Wars..............wish me luck! 

timbers_WSU
I am pretty sure reporting too many times is still against the rules. Or at least I remember something like that being a rule.
Avatar image for CaseyWegner
CaseyWegner

70152

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#504 CaseyWegner
Member since 2002 • 70152 Posts

[QUOTE="cakeorrdeath"][QUOTE="Jakandsigz"] BULLSHIT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!! You look at those posts and are BAFFLED as to how it's BS? The fact the guy I quoted was continuously in that same thread doing the same BS for no reason? What kind of deluded piece of crap are you? This forum is screwed. Are is reading not a strong suit of yours? Need help with the words?Jakandsigz
You are treading thin ice...

I'm sorry, so you won't be kind enough to show me where I got modded for with good reason? Ok fine, can you give me a link to someone who would please? I mean I am asking you nicely. I mean what is the point of being told I can appeal or have someone check on the moderation, if when i did so I am on thin ice at someones discretionary? So again, just being very nice here, someone to help me understand, how my mod was relevant.

that's being nice?

Avatar image for Jonwh18
Jonwh18

9350

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#505 Jonwh18
Member since 2009 • 9350 Posts

:lol: Glorious! 

Avatar image for timbers_WSU
timbers_WSU

6076

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#506 timbers_WSU
Member since 2012 • 6076 Posts

[QUOTE="timbers_WSU"][QUOTE="cakeorrdeath"] They definitely do and Jakandsigz can clearly see in his mod history the post that got him his first strike and I would be baffled if he is honestly confused as to why it merited one. CaseyWegner

I just looked it up again and I did not see a link telling me why I was modded. And I really don't care to be honest. You all have let the trolls run wild for so long all the good posters are bound to get banned anyways.

oh. wait. was that just the pm you got? did you check your mod history? that's where the details are.

There wasn't a link to it...It doesn't really matter. When I go to the board I see all these Sony trolls that have not even reached a level 10 and it becomes pretty obvious I would not lose out on anything if I went to anther board. At least of GAF you actually get modded for a reason. I have been there 2 years...no problems. Come here and it is like 4th grade P.E.
Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#507 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
You are treading thin ice...cakeorrdeath
It's thinly veiled threats like this that made me despise the old ToS.
Avatar image for Jakandsigz
Jakandsigz

6341

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#508 Jakandsigz
Member since 2013 • 6341 Posts
[QUOTE="cakeorrdeath"][QUOTE="Jakandsigz"][QUOTE="cakeorrdeath"] You are treading thin ice...

I'm sorry, so you won't be kind enough to show me where I got modded for with good reason? Ok fine, can you give me a link to someone who would please? I mean I am asking you nicely. I mean what is the point of being told I can appeal or have someone check on the moderation, if when i did so I am on thin ice at someones discretionary? So again, just being very nice here, someone to help me understand, how my mod was relevant.

Raise a thread in ask the mods and I will gladly talk you though it. This thread is not the appropriate place for it.

Took this long to get you to do this? Anyway i made it.
Avatar image for Jakandsigz
Jakandsigz

6341

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#509 Jakandsigz
Member since 2013 • 6341 Posts

[QUOTE="Jakandsigz"][QUOTE="cakeorrdeath"] You are treading thin ice...CaseyWegner

I'm sorry, so you won't be kind enough to show me where I got modded for with good reason? Ok fine, can you give me a link to someone who would please? I mean I am asking you nicely. I mean what is the point of being told I can appeal or have someone check on the moderation, if when i did so I am on thin ice at someones discretionary? So again, just being very nice here, someone to help me understand, how my mod was relevant.

that's being nice?

Nicer than his post.
Avatar image for CaseyWegner
CaseyWegner

70152

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#510 CaseyWegner
Member since 2002 • 70152 Posts

[QUOTE="CaseyWegner"]

[QUOTE="timbers_WSU"] I just looked it up again and I did not see a link telling me why I was modded. And I really don't care to be honest. You all have let the trolls run wild for so long all the good posters are bound to get banned anyways.timbers_WSU

oh. wait. was that just the pm you got? did you check your mod history? that's where the details are.

There wasn't a link to it...It doesn't really matter. When I go to the board I see all these Sony trolls that have not even reached a level 10 and it becomes pretty obvious I would not lose out on anything if I went to anther board. At least of GAF you actually get modded for a reason. I have been there 2 years...no problems. Come here and it is like 4th grade P.E.

you should check your mod history.

Avatar image for CaseyWegner
CaseyWegner

70152

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#511 CaseyWegner
Member since 2002 • 70152 Posts

[QUOTE="CaseyWegner"]

[QUOTE="Jakandsigz"] I'm sorry, so you won't be kind enough to show me where I got modded for with good reason? Ok fine, can you give me a link to someone who would please? I mean I am asking you nicely. I mean what is the point of being told I can appeal or have someone check on the moderation, if when i did so I am on thin ice at someones discretionary? So again, just being very nice here, someone to help me understand, how my mod was relevant.Jakandsigz

that's being nice?

Nicer than his post.

"BULLSHIT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!! What kind of deluded piece of crap are you? Are is reading not a strong suit of yours? Need help with the words?"

really?

Avatar image for Jakandsigz
Jakandsigz

6341

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#512 Jakandsigz
Member since 2013 • 6341 Posts

[QUOTE="Jakandsigz"][QUOTE="CaseyWegner"]

that's being nice?

CaseyWegner

Nicer than his post.

"BULLSHIT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!! What kind of deluded piece of crap are you? Are is reading not a strong suit of yours? Need help with the words?"

really?

Which is the post before the one you quoted. I mean you can at least try to have consistency instead of twisting things around.
Avatar image for Jakandsigz
Jakandsigz

6341

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#513 Jakandsigz
Member since 2013 • 6341 Posts
Did what cake told me to do. Still no cake.
Avatar image for CaseyWegner
CaseyWegner

70152

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#514 CaseyWegner
Member since 2002 • 70152 Posts

[QUOTE="CaseyWegner"]

[QUOTE="Jakandsigz"] Nicer than his post. Jakandsigz

"BULLSHIT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!! What kind of deluded piece of crap are you? Are is reading not a strong suit of yours? Need help with the words?"

really?

Which is the post before the one you quoted. I mean you can at least try to have consistency instead of twisting things around.

i didn't twist anything.

Avatar image for Ballroompirate
Ballroompirate

26695

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#515 Ballroompirate
Member since 2005 • 26695 Posts

[QUOTE="CaseyWegner"]what does calling somebody an idiot really accomplish? i agree about the old trolling rules but this new system is better.foxhound_fox
What does saying anything other than that to them accomplish if they are acting like an idiot?

Hate to say it, been here since 2005 and this is the first time I highly agree with Fox on something. The new ToU goes in favor with people who troll and they know they can get away with it cause no one can say anything about it cause they'll get MODDED while trolls get off scott free.

This new ToU is just a ball gag, it does NOTHING to help the community to get better, in fact it just makes it worse.

Avatar image for CaseyWegner
CaseyWegner

70152

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#516 CaseyWegner
Member since 2002 • 70152 Posts

[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"][QUOTE="CaseyWegner"]what does calling somebody an idiot really accomplish? i agree about the old trolling rules but this new system is better.Ballroompirate

What does saying anything other than that to them accomplish if they are acting like an idiot?

Hate to say it, been here since 2005 and this is the first time I highly agree with Fox on something. The new ToU goes in favor with people who troll and they know they can get away with it cause no one can say anything about it cause they'll get MODDED while trolls get off scott free.

This new ToU is just a ball gag, it does NOTHING to help the community to get better, in fact it just makes it worse.

i still don't see what calling somebody an idiot accomplishes...especially if they're trolling.

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#518 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
[This message was deleted at the request of a moderator or administrator]
Avatar image for CaseyWegner
CaseyWegner

70152

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#519 CaseyWegner
Member since 2002 • 70152 Posts

is it going to stop them from being an idiot?

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#520 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts

is it going to stop them from being an idiot?

CaseyWegner
Who's trying to stop them from being an idiot? And wow, talk about record time. Still haven't even got the notification. Wonder if I can get more.
Avatar image for CaseyWegner
CaseyWegner

70152

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#521 CaseyWegner
Member since 2002 • 70152 Posts

[QUOTE="CaseyWegner"]

is it going to stop them from being an idiot?

foxhound_fox

Who's trying to stop them from being an idiot? And wow, talk about record time. Still haven't even got the notification. Wonder if I can get more.

then what does it accomplish?

Avatar image for cakeorrdeath
cakeorrdeath

19079

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#522 cakeorrdeath
Member since 2006 • 19079 Posts

Fox I am not modding you but please dont flame people, especially in this thread.

Avatar image for Ballroompirate
Ballroompirate

26695

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#523 Ballroompirate
Member since 2005 • 26695 Posts

is it going to stop them from being an idiot?

CaseyWegner

Actually it does or at least proves their "claims" are wrong.

Also to play this pathetic game of cat and mouse, is the new ToU gonna make the website/community better, do you have proof it will work? or is it just some yolo attempt to try and make the site "better" w/o actually looking at what's making the site fall apart when we literally tell you and show you what needs to be fixed.

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#524 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts

Fox I am not modding you but please dont flame people, especially in this thread.

cakeorrdeath
I'm disappointed you didn't. I'm looking for an excuse to leave. I'm seriously flabbergasted how the entire mod team doesn't give a sh!t about this and is accepting it without any negative feedback, and enforcing it already to old ToS levels no less. A volunteer position on a website mean that much to you all? This new ToU is dumb as fvck and I'll be glad when I get banned (I can't believe I ever took getting moderations seriously). This community of wonderful people has been overall good to me, but these new rules are going to turn it to sh!t very quickly (people are going to be scared to post because they'll expect to be modded if the rules are not distinctly black and white). I'm not surprised many regulars have already left and are rarely seen anymore. Like the old ToS, these new rules will do absolutely fvck all to promote positive discussion. How you do that is have designated topic posters, who have good topic ideas, and get them to post on a regular basis. All we get here, for the most part, is troll threads with little to no effort put into them. Delete the troll threads and replace them with something of meaningful discussion. I find it interesting that GS thinks going back to a variation on the old system, despite the old system proving it didn't work, is a good idea.
Avatar image for Stevo_the_gamer
Stevo_the_gamer

50077

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 49

User Lists: 0

#525 Stevo_the_gamer  Moderator
Member since 2004 • 50077 Posts
Interesting, the new rules have been in place for eight days and Gamespot hasn't imploded. Although, when one goes to poo quickly, is quickly in the span of months, years, or decades?
Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#526 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
Interesting, the new rules have been in place for eight days and Gamespot hasn't imploded. Although, when one goes to poo quickly, is quickly in the span of months, years, or decades?Stevo_the_gamer
Start banning some people and watch the community fade away.
Avatar image for Alessandro_R
Alessandro_R

54

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#527 Alessandro_R
Member since 2013 • 54 Posts
So this gets one modded, but calling someone a "filthy peasant" might or might not get one modded... Up to the discretion of the moderator..
Avatar image for Ballroompirate
Ballroompirate

26695

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#528 Ballroompirate
Member since 2005 • 26695 Posts

Interesting, the new rules have been in place for eight days and Gamespot hasn't imploded. Although, when one goes to poo quickly, is quickly in the span of months, years, or decades?Stevo_the_gamer

Doesn't need to implode when people are leaving or looking at other sites to post on, hell some long time posters are already starting to not really post here.

Also I'd say the reaction towards the new ToU and GS layout is far from positive so I'd layoff w/e you're doing to make you think nothing is going down hill on this site.

Avatar image for CaseyWegner
CaseyWegner

70152

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#529 CaseyWegner
Member since 2002 • 70152 Posts

[QUOTE="CaseyWegner"]

is it going to stop them from being an idiot?

Ballroompirate

Actually it does or at least proves their "claims" are wrong.

Also to play this pathetic game of cat and mouse, is the new ToU gonna make the website/community better, do you have proof it will work? or is it just some yolo attempt to try and make the site "better" w/o actually looking at what's making the site fall apart when we literally tell you and show you what needs to be fixed.

calling somebody an idiot proves their claims wrong?

were you here for the tou that came before the previous one? it was harsher yet the forum was still very popular. then the rules changed to become more lenient and it brought about more complaints than anything else. there were so many complaints that a special meeting was called and plans were made to change the rules less than two years after implementing the lenient rules. do i have proof that it'll work? of course not. it's impossible to prove whether it will work but if a more strict tou didn't kill the forum, why would a less strict tou kill it? long-time posters left when the lenient rules were introduced but the forum survived. it'll survive again and attract people that may have been put off by the cesspool that was created.

Avatar image for NameIess_One
NameIess_One

1077

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#531 NameIess_One
Member since 2013 • 1077 Posts

Interesting, the new rules have been in place for eight days and Gamespot hasn't imploded. Although, when one goes to poo quickly, is quickly in the span of months, years, or decades?Stevo_the_gamer

The site won't turn to shit with a bang, it'll be a much more subtle and silent process, with people leaving, or becoming more and more scared of openly expressing their thoughts, knowing it could easily get them moderated because of something as vague as a mod having a bad day.

To make it clear, I'm not against this new ToU because I desperately want to be able to insult people (see my (Rocker's) posting history, and you'll see I don't make insults a habit), I'm against it because it'll squash that general SW attitude where you know you can openly express yourself about anything, without having to sugar-coat it. I haven't been posting in the old, "Casey's" ToU that everyone hated, I'm only used to this lenient model which works great, as far as I'm concerned.

Avatar image for Lucianu
Lucianu

10347

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#532 Lucianu
Member since 2007 • 10347 Posts

The site won't turn to shit with a bang, it'll be a much more subtle and silent process, with people leaving, or becoming more and more scared of openly expressing their thoughts, knowing it could easily get them moderated because of something as vague as a mod having a bad day.

NameIess_One

It really won't happen. If you trully think it will, i don't think you can imagine how restrictive and straight up bullshit the old ToU was, and the community flourished under that. 

To put things into perspective, under "Casey's" old ToU my account received messages notifying me of warnings, the usual point loss, 1 day - 3 day suspensions because of trolling, obscure shit like 'disruptive posting' that's solely in the eye of the beholder, far more subtle insults than what we've become used to now, and so on, at least twice a week, usually three times a week.

Shit, i'd get a point loss for writting the word 'shit' right now, no joke, and no exaggeration (hell, anyone from the staff can probably check my moderation history to be sure i'm not exaggerating).

As for this new 'new' ToU.. i haven't even gotten a warning yet. I wouldn't have known about the existence of this 'new' ToU if i wouldn't have read this thread. And i sure as fvck ain't no saint or the perfect picture of civilized behavior/courtesy. 

Avatar image for CaseyWegner
CaseyWegner

70152

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#533 CaseyWegner
Member since 2002 • 70152 Posts

okay. why are we calling the older tou "casey's tou" now?

Avatar image for Animal-Mother
Animal-Mother

27362

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#534 Animal-Mother
Member since 2003 • 27362 Posts
[QUOTE="cakeorrdeath"]

Fox I am not modding you but please dont flame people, especially in this thread.

foxhound_fox
I'm disappointed you didn't. I'm looking for an excuse to leave. I'm seriously flabbergasted how the entire mod team doesn't give a sh!t about this and is accepting it without any negative feedback, and enforcing it already to old ToS levels no less. A volunteer position on a website mean that much to you all? This new ToU is dumb as fvck and I'll be glad when I get banned (I can't believe I ever took getting moderations seriously). This community of wonderful people has been overall good to me, but these new rules are going to turn it to sh!t very quickly (people are going to be scared to post because they'll expect to be modded if the rules are not distinctly black and white). I'm not surprised many regulars have already left and are rarely seen anymore. Like the old ToS, these new rules will do absolutely fvck all to promote positive discussion. How you do that is have designated topic posters, who have good topic ideas, and get them to post on a regular basis. All we get here, for the most part, is troll threads with little to no effort put into them. Delete the troll threads and replace them with something of meaningful discussion. I find it interesting that GS thinks going back to a variation on the old system, despite the old system proving it didn't work, is a good idea.

Not to pop my head back in here but i've been reading this. And while i'm not a fan of a specific someone. If you're "looking for an excuse to leave." Just leave than. Why are you sitting here just complaining on and on?
Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#535 lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

wow there's a lot of whining going on in here

Avatar image for Stevo_the_gamer
Stevo_the_gamer

50077

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 49

User Lists: 0

#536 Stevo_the_gamer  Moderator
Member since 2004 • 50077 Posts

[QUOTE="Stevo_the_gamer"]Interesting, the new rules have been in place for eight days and Gamespot hasn't imploded. Although, when one goes to poo quickly, is quickly in the span of months, years, or decades?NameIess_One

The site won't turn to shit with a bang, it'll be a much more subtle and silent process, with people leaving, or becoming more and more scared of openly expressing their thoughts, knowing it could easily get them moderated because of something as vague as a mod having a bad day.

To make it clear, I'm not against this new ToU because I desperately want to be able to insult people (see my (Rocker's) posting history, and you'll see I don't make insults a habit), I'm against it because it'll squash that general SW attitude where you know you can openly express yourself about anything, without having to sugar-coat it. I haven't been posting in the old, "Casey's" ToU that everyone hated, I'm only used to this lenient model which works great, as far as I'm concerned.

You can still openly discuss practically anything. You won't get slapped with trolling moderations left and right like in the past because you made a disparaging comment about the Wii U or 360. Basically, keep a cool head and not turn to personal insults and you'll be fine. "The Xbox is trash because XBL sucks and costs money." Fine. "The Xbox is trash because XBL sucks and costs money and everyone that pays for this is stupid as hell." Not fine.

The best summary I can provide is simply... keep it classy.

Avatar image for NameIess_One
NameIess_One

1077

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#539 NameIess_One
Member since 2013 • 1077 Posts

okay. why are we calling the older tou "casey's tou" now?

CaseyWegner

It was just a minor pun on my part, every time someone brings up that old ToU, doesn't take long before you're mentioned as well. Didn't mean anything by it! :P

-------

As for Lucianu and Stevo, will respond later, in a bit of a rush now...

Avatar image for Alessandro_R
Alessandro_R

54

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#540 Alessandro_R
Member since 2013 • 54 Posts

[QUOTE="NameIess_One"]

[QUOTE="Stevo_the_gamer"]Interesting, the new rules have been in place for eight days and Gamespot hasn't imploded. Although, when one goes to poo quickly, is quickly in the span of months, years, or decades?Stevo_the_gamer

The site won't turn to shit with a bang, it'll be a much more subtle and silent process, with people leaving, or becoming more and more scared of openly expressing their thoughts, knowing it could easily get them moderated because of something as vague as a mod having a bad day.

To make it clear, I'm not against this new ToU because I desperately want to be able to insult people (see my (Rocker's) posting history, and you'll see I don't make insults a habit), I'm against it because it'll squash that general SW attitude where you know you can openly express yourself about anything, without having to sugar-coat it. I haven't been posting in the old, "Casey's" ToU that everyone hated, I'm only used to this lenient model which works great, as far as I'm concerned.

You can still openly discuss practically anything. You won't get slapped with trolling moderations left and right like in the past because you made a disparaging comment about the Wii U or 360. Basically, keep a cool head and not turn to personal insults and you'll be fine. "The Xbox is trash because XBL sucks and costs money." Fine. "The Xbox is trash because XBL sucks and costs money and everyone that pays for this is stupid as hell." Not fine.

The best summary I can provide is simply... keep it classy.

When is the first post in this thread going to be reflected to state that. Calling someone "dumb" does not constitute as "hate speech" "It is my pleasure to announce that we will be changing our Terms of Usealong with revising how we moderate the site. If we are to grow as a community, we must hold some level of respect towards each other and in doing so we must be able to communicate like proper human beings. Hate speech and threats have no place in any community that hopes to be welcoming and engaging towards anyone who simply wants to talk to likeminded individuals. I realize that simply saying we are changing things isnt enough so starting today anyone with moderating powers on the site will enforce our existing guidelines (and continue to do so once new ones are in place) in the following way. First offense: User will receive a warning. Second offense: Seven-day suspension from the site Third offense: Permanent Ban from GameSpot For the sake of clarity, this will include forums, comment sections, and blogs. The ban will be imposed to those that violate our guidelines within a span of 60 days of each offense. If no further incidents occur within the 60 day period, the user will be cycled back to good standing all is right in the world. For most of you, the only effect of these changes should be a noticeable improvement in the quality of conversation across the site. On the other hand some of you might see this as an unrealistic request and to those individual Id like to remind them that there are plenty of vestibules in the online space that would welcome your closed minded views. GameSpot will not tolerate hate speech, threats, and we will ban accordingly at our own discretion." http://m.dictionary.com/definition/hate%20speech noun 1. speech that attacks a person or group on the basis of race, religion, gender, or sexual orientation.
Avatar image for EPaul
EPaul

9917

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#541 EPaul
Member since 2006 • 9917 Posts

I just hope when the site changes it isn't like what happened at GT. After the site changed the forums basically died in a few months.

Avatar image for CaseyWegner
CaseyWegner

70152

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#542 CaseyWegner
Member since 2002 • 70152 Posts

[QUOTE="CaseyWegner"]

okay. why are we calling the older tou "casey's tou" now?

NameIess_One

It was just a minor pun on my part, every time someone brings up that old ToU, doesn't take long before you're mentioned as well. Didn't mean anything by it! :P

-------

As for Lucianu and Stevo, will respond later, in a bit of a rush now...

it was kind of funny.

Avatar image for Lucianu
Lucianu

10347

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#543 Lucianu
Member since 2007 • 10347 Posts

it was kind of funny.

CaseyWegner

It's the easiest way to differentiate it from the ... old, newer ToU, and the current, new ToU. 

Casey's old ToU it is. 

Avatar image for CaseyWegner
CaseyWegner

70152

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#544 CaseyWegner
Member since 2002 • 70152 Posts

[QUOTE="CaseyWegner"]

it was kind of funny.

Lucianu

It's the easiest way to differentiate it from the ... old, newer ToU, and the current, new ToU. 

Casey's old ToU it is. 

i didn't even like that tou. :(

Avatar image for verbtex
verbtex

9196

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#545 verbtex  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 9196 Posts

Also mods can just give you 3 infractions all at once, which would get you banned forever without actually ever getting a fair warning...Alessandro_R

We can see your mod history and see if a strike was given.

Avatar image for verbtex
verbtex

9196

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#546 verbtex  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 9196 Posts

[QUOTE="CaseyWegner"]

it was kind of funny.

Lucianu

It's the easiest way to differentiate it from the ... old, newer ToU, and the current, new ToU. 

Casey's old ToU it is. 

Casey never wrote a TOU. He did have a guide on how not to get moderated.

Avatar image for Animal-Mother
Animal-Mother

27362

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#547 Animal-Mother
Member since 2003 • 27362 Posts

[QUOTE="Lucianu"]

[QUOTE="CaseyWegner"]

it was kind of funny.

verbtex

It's the easiest way to differentiate it from the ... old, newer ToU, and the current, new ToU. 

Casey's old ToU it is. 

Casey never wrote a TOU. He did have a guide on how not to get moderated.

Who does?
Avatar image for NameIess_One
NameIess_One

1077

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#548 NameIess_One
Member since 2013 • 1077 Posts

[QUOTE="NameIess_One"]

The site won't turn to shit with a bang, it'll be a much more subtle and silent process, with people leaving, or becoming more and more scared of openly expressing their thoughts, knowing it could easily get them moderated because of something as vague as a mod having a bad day.

Lucianu

It really won't happen. If you trully think it will, i don't think you can imagine how restrictive and straight up bullshit the old ToU was, and the community flourished under that. 

To put things into perspective, under "Casey's" old ToU my account received messages notifying me of warnings, the usual point loss, 1 day - 3 day suspensions because of trolling, obscure shit like 'disruptive posting' that's solely in the eye of the beholder, far more subtle insults than what we've become used to now, and so on, at least twice a week, usually three times a week.

Shit, i'd get a point loss for writting the word 'shit' right now, no joke, and no exaggeration (hell, anyone from the staff can probably check my moderation history to be sure i'm not exaggerating).

As for this new 'new' ToU.. i haven't even gotten a warning yet. I wouldn't have known about the existence of this 'new' ToU if i wouldn't have read this thread. And i sure as fvck ain't no saint or the perfect picture of civilized behavior/courtesy. 

It was that bad?

But then again, I'd argue this new ToU is even more strict, due to the 3 strike policy. Sure, the rules itself may be more leniently written, but those punishments sound troublesome, since "hate speech" is a pretty wide term that can be rather dangerous when moderations are subjectively handled.

The biggest issue I see here is, when you net a first warning, even by accident, it's easy to get an impression you're threading on thin ice, which leads to a more tame posting style. There's no reason why "basic" insults shouldn't be allowed, nothing about this place says anything about "friendly posting environment", even the board title and the description make it very clear a thick skin is required if you want to "survive" SW.

Avatar image for Alessandro_R
Alessandro_R

54

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#549 Alessandro_R
Member since 2013 • 54 Posts
http://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/hate-speech Hate Speech: Definitions noun speech disparaging a racial, sexual, or ethnic group or a member of such a group If any mod interprets hate speech as anything else. They are simply not the sharpest tool in the shed
Avatar image for Alessandro_R
Alessandro_R

54

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#550 Alessandro_R
Member since 2013 • 54 Posts
If your gonna mod people for insulting people, change the rule to read "no insults" . It really is that simple