Important Update to the GameSpot Community Code of Conduct

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Ballroompirate
Ballroompirate

26695

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#201 Ballroompirate
Member since 2005 • 26695 Posts

[QUOTE="super600"]

[QUOTE="bbkkristian"]Is calling someone an idiot moddable?mitu123

 

Yes!It is moddable the last time I checked.

Wow this place is gonna be tame as hell.

We need code words to call people "bads" or "idiots"

Cylons= Bads

Red power ranger= superiority

Savior of Hyrul= idiot

Avatar image for super600
super600

33160

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#202 super600  Moderator  Online
Member since 2007 • 33160 Posts

[QUOTE="super600"]

[QUOTE="bbkkristian"]Is calling someone an idiot moddable?mitu123

 

Yes!It is moddable the last time I checked.

Wow this place is gonna be tame as hell.

 

I need to double check that so take what I said with a grain of salt. I know the other word is moddable.This depends on how that other word is used.

Avatar image for Cyberdot
Cyberdot

3928

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#203 Cyberdot
Member since 2013 • 3928 Posts

That's a welcome news, I guess.

The population of obnoxious posters needs reducing, there's too many of them.

------

Admin, the TC of this thread, your "GameSpot" link in the signature needs fixing. ;)

Avatar image for Master_Live
Master_Live

20550

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 7

#204 Master_Live
Member since 2004 • 20550 Posts
Piece of junk.
Avatar image for balfe1990
balfe1990

6747

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#205 balfe1990
Member since 2009 • 6747 Posts

Oh yeah, presenting the new GameSpot

NewGS_Forums_zps2e94bc29.png

Blabadon

If the forums turn into that anonymous bullshit, totally sig-free, I'm out of here for good.

Why would they remove all of the character and personality of the forums, and turn to some by-the-numbers solution? One of the good things about System Wars is being able to easily distinguish each individual user thanks to their sig/avy. Having to glance at just a barebones name to make a distinction would become tedious and tiresome.

Even though it can be largely populated by fools at times, the SWs community is the thing I like most about Gamespot. For all the bickering and fighting, we're quite close-knit, like a small village where everyone knows everyone (but contains way more than just the one village idiot). That serves to strenghten the forum as a whole, as people feel connected and commited in a way. I have no idea why Gamespot would choose to go down this boring, lifeless road.

And, like BPoole said, if SWs get merged, then there's absoluely no hope of me staying here/coming back.

Avatar image for TheEroica
TheEroica

24432

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#206 TheEroica  Moderator
Member since 2009 • 24432 Posts
The best things in life are equal parts sweet and sour. That's the reason I liked the old ToU. . I figured we'd eventually strike our balance... I'll be skeptical for a while but but maybe something good will come out of it. Restrictions are kind of blah though.
Avatar image for TheEroica
TheEroica

24432

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#207 TheEroica  Moderator
Member since 2009 • 24432 Posts

[QUOTE="Blabadon"]

Oh yeah, presenting the new GameSpot

NewGS_Forums_zps2e94bc29.png

balfe1990

If the forums turn into that anonymous bullshit, totally sig-free, I'm out of here for good.

Why would they remove all of the character and personality of the forums, and turn to some by-the-numbers solution? One of the good things about System Wars is being able to easily distinguish each individual user thanks to their sig/avy. Having to glance at just a barebones name to make a distinction would become tedious and tiresome.

Even though it can be largely populated by fools at times, the SWs community is the thing I like most about Gamespot. For all the bickering and fighting, we're quite close-knit, like a small village where everyone knows everyone (but contains way more than just the one village idiot). That serves to strenghten the forum as a whole, as people feel connected and commited in a way. I have no idea why Gamespot would choose to go down this boring, lifeless road.

And, like BPoole said, if SWs get merged, then there's absoluely no hope of me staying here/coming back.

I've been using the new layout and setting sigs/avis etc... The new layout isn't that bad at all... In fact there are some logical additions that make it have a nicer flow to it. The only reason you see the blank Ave is the same reason u see the G now for users who haven't set one. Currently the layout and user pages are really nice... To me.
Avatar image for clyde46
clyde46

49061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#208 clyde46
Member since 2005 • 49061 Posts
[QUOTE="balfe1990"]

[QUOTE="Blabadon"]

Oh yeah, presenting the new GameSpot

NewGS_Forums_zps2e94bc29.png

TheEroica

If the forums turn into that anonymous bullshit, totally sig-free, I'm out of here for good.

Why would they remove all of the character and personality of the forums, and turn to some by-the-numbers solution? One of the good things about System Wars is being able to easily distinguish each individual user thanks to their sig/avy. Having to glance at just a barebones name to make a distinction would become tedious and tiresome.

Even though it can be largely populated by fools at times, the SWs community is the thing I like most about Gamespot. For all the bickering and fighting, we're quite close-knit, like a small village where everyone knows everyone (but contains way more than just the one village idiot). That serves to strenghten the forum as a whole, as people feel connected and commited in a way. I have no idea why Gamespot would choose to go down this boring, lifeless road.

And, like BPoole said, if SWs get merged, then there's absoluely no hope of me staying here/coming back.

I've been using the new layout and setting sigs/avis etc... The new layout isn't that bad at all... In fact there are some logical additions that make it have a nicer flow to it. The only reason you see the blank Ave is the same reason u see the G now for users who haven't set one. Currently the layout and user pages are really nice... To me.

Pics or it didn't happen.
Avatar image for NameIess_One
NameIess_One

1077

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#209 NameIess_One
Member since 2013 • 1077 Posts

[QUOTE="mitu123"][QUOTE="super600"]

 

Yes!It is moddable the last time I checked.

Ballroompirate

Wow this place is gonna be tame as hell.

We need code words to call people "bads" or "idiots"

Cylons= Bads

Red power ranger= superiority

Savior of Hyrul= idiot

Greetings, esteemed Savior of Hyrul! :P

Avatar image for NameIess_One
NameIess_One

1077

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#211 NameIess_One
Member since 2013 • 1077 Posts

Even though it can be largely populated by fools at times, the SWs community is the thing I like most about Gamespot. For all the bickering and fighting, we're quite close-knit, like a small village where everyone knows everyone (but contains way more than just the one village idiot). That serves to strenghten the forum as a whole, as people feel connected and commited in a way. I have no idea why Gamespot would choose to go down this boring, lifeless road.

And, like BPoole said, if SWs get merged, then there's absoluely no hope of me staying here/coming back.

balfe1990

So true... all things considered, SW is a great board, the sense of camaraderie here is extraordinary.

And yeah, if PGD and SW got merged, nothing good would come out of it. They're two different boards operating in a completely different manner. I have no idea who even thought of such a thing, makes no sense... but then again, lots of things don't make much sense here recently.

Avatar image for Cyberdot
Cyberdot

3928

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#212 Cyberdot
Member since 2013 • 3928 Posts

[QUOTE="Blabadon"]

Oh yeah, presenting the new GameSpot

NewGS_Forums_zps2e94bc29.png

balfe1990

If the forums turn into that anonymous bullshit, totally sig-free, I'm out of here for good.

Why would they remove all of the character and personality of the forums, and turn to some by-the-numbers solution? One of the good things about System Wars is being able to easily distinguish each individual user thanks to their sig/avy. Having to glance at just a barebones name to make a distinction would become tedious and tiresome.

Even though it can be largely populated by fools at times, the SWs community is the thing I like most about Gamespot. For all the bickering and fighting, we're quite close-knit, like a small village where everyone knows everyone (but contains way more than just the one village idiot). That serves to strenghten the forum as a whole, as people feel connected and commited in a way. I have no idea why Gamespot would choose to go down this boring, lifeless road.

And, like BPoole said, if SWs get merged, then there's absoluely no hope of me staying here/coming back.

Well said, I agree.

Avatar image for dr_jashugan
dr_jashugan

2665

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#213 dr_jashugan
Member since 2006 • 2665 Posts

Excellent. I don't know why GS permitted loose behaviour on the site in the fisrt place. 

Good riddance to all those foul mouthed posters! :cool:

Avatar image for balfe1990
balfe1990

6747

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#214 balfe1990
Member since 2009 • 6747 Posts

I've been using the new layout and setting sigs/avis etc... The new layout isn't that bad at all... In fact there are some logical additions that make it have a nicer flow to it.  TheEroica

How did you manage that? Is there an option?

And I agree the format could use some updating, but not a total overhaul. The above just looks unrecognisable. Partly because it looks like every other board out there.

Avatar image for TheEroica
TheEroica

24432

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#215 TheEroica  Moderator
Member since 2009 • 24432 Posts

[QUOTE="TheEroica"] I've been using the new layout and setting sigs/avis etc... The new layout isn't that bad at all... In fact there are some logical additions that make it have a nicer flow to it.  balfe1990

How did you manage that? Is there an option?

And I agree the format could use some updating, but not a total overhaul. The above just looks unrecognisable. Partly because it looks like every other board out there.

I was invited. I've played around a bit with it, responding to topics and such just to see how id like the flow of it... Once people get in and start creating sigs and avis and see how easy it is to bounce around the forums I think there will be some positive feedback. There will be some gripes too but yeah, blabs picture highlights grossness on the surface, but its not what it will look like.
Avatar image for Lucianu
Lucianu

10347

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#216 Lucianu
Member since 2007 • 10347 Posts

[QUOTE="Tessellation"]

[QUOTE="super600"]

 

Yes!It is moddable the last time I checked.

super600

moron is actually more *offensive* than idiot if you trully look what people tries to insinuate when they call you that..so calling someone a moron is also moddable ?

Moron is moddable, but this depends on the context of the post.

I think that's pretty obvious considering that if it's not directly offending someone, then there is no problem. For example, i should be able to call myself a 'idiot, moron' or say 'shit' 'f*ck', whatever, to express a strong point of view, if such a particular situation in which i'll need that type of vocabulary should arise. 

Obviously with a limit, otherwise i'm just a disruptive foul mouth jackass that deserves a ban. 

But, if we're back to 'absolutely no foul language allowed regardless of context' then we're back to that ridiculously restrictive as hell type a bullshit that no other forum does, because it makes no sense whatsoever. We're not saints, and we're on the internet no less. 

Avatar image for organic_machine
organic_machine

10143

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#217 organic_machine
Member since 2004 • 10143 Posts

I think moderations really depend on context. If you call me an idiot in the midst of a reasonable and on-topic post, I would not personally moderate that. Others might, but I wouldn't. If your entire post is just "you're an idiot" then it would be moderation worthy.

It's all about context, but it's good practice to avoid insults all together.

Avatar image for Lumpy311
Lumpy311

2009

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#218 Lumpy311
Member since 2013 • 2009 Posts

This sucks.

 

Taking the fun out of System Wars just sucks.

If this place gets merged i'm out of here too, by the way.

Great job on alienating your community.

Avatar image for Stevo_the_gamer
Stevo_the_gamer

50074

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 49

User Lists: 0

#219 Stevo_the_gamer  Moderator
Member since 2004 • 50074 Posts
If this place gets mergedLumpy311
Where are you even getting that notion?
Avatar image for Lumpy311
Lumpy311

2009

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#220 Lumpy311
Member since 2013 • 2009 Posts

[QUOTE="Lumpy311"]If this place gets mergedStevo_the_gamer
Where are you even getting that notion?

You could try to read the actual thread before making questions.

Avatar image for Riverwolf007
Riverwolf007

26023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#221 Riverwolf007
Member since 2005 • 26023 Posts

lol.

now i have to go back to.

"if i am being honest with you here, it is my considered opinion that it is possible that you may not know much about the subject of which you are speaking on" as opposed to the recent ability to just say, "you're an idiot".

Avatar image for organic_machine
organic_machine

10143

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#222 organic_machine
Member since 2004 • 10143 Posts

lol.

now i have to go back to.

"if i am being honest with you here, it is my considered opinion that it is possible that you may not know much about the subject of which you are speaking on" as opposed to the recent ability to just say, "you're an idiot".

Riverwolf007

That might be a bit overkill! :P

If you do happen to write like that, I will picture you with a top hat and a monocle, sipping tea!

"I SAY!"

Avatar image for Lucianu
Lucianu

10347

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#223 Lucianu
Member since 2007 • 10347 Posts

lol.

now i have to go back to.

"if i am being honest with you here, it is my considered opinion that it is possible that you may not know much about the subject of which you are speaking on" as opposed to the recent ability to just say, "you're an idiot".

Riverwolf007

If you wanna aim for a 'nicest person on the net' award, sure, though i'd go with 'apparently you're clueless on this subject, so let me school you a little' , thus i commence in a lil' short, two sentences tops, explanation, then BAM. Done. 

Avatar image for Stevo_the_gamer
Stevo_the_gamer

50074

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 49

User Lists: 0

#224 Stevo_the_gamer  Moderator
Member since 2004 • 50074 Posts

[QUOTE="Stevo_the_gamer"][QUOTE="Lumpy311"]If this place gets mergedLumpy311

Where are you even getting that notion?

You could try to read the actual thread before making questions.

You could try to answer the question so I can give you an answer.
Avatar image for NameIess_One
NameIess_One

1077

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#225 NameIess_One
Member since 2013 • 1077 Posts

[QUOTE="Lumpy311"]

[QUOTE="Stevo_the_gamer"]Where are you even getting that notion?Stevo_the_gamer

You could try to read the actual thread before making questions.

You could try to answer the question so I can give you an answer.

We're getting the idea from here:

NewGS_Forums_zps2e94bc29.png

In that "Forums" tab, there is "Games discussion", "Nintendo discussion", "Sony discussion", etc, which makes it look as if PGD and SW were merged into one.

Can you give us a confirmation if they're still separate boards?

Avatar image for Stevo_the_gamer
Stevo_the_gamer

50074

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 49

User Lists: 0

#226 Stevo_the_gamer  Moderator
Member since 2004 • 50074 Posts
Can you give us a confirmation if they're still separate boards?NameIess_One
SystemWars (and so does Off-Topic) exists, and it's not "merged" with anything.
Avatar image for NameIess_One
NameIess_One

1077

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#227 NameIess_One
Member since 2013 • 1077 Posts

[QUOTE="NameIess_One"]Can you give us a confirmation if they're still separate boards?Stevo_the_gamer
SystemWars (and so does Off-Topic) exists, and it's not "merged" with anything.

Alright, thanks for clearing that up.

Avatar image for Lumpy311
Lumpy311

2009

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#228 Lumpy311
Member since 2013 • 2009 Posts

[QUOTE="NameIess_One"]Can you give us a confirmation if they're still separate boards?Stevo_the_gamer
SystemWars (and so does Off-Topic) exists, and it's not "merged" with anything.

great

 

still a shit layout and shit new rules

Avatar image for Stevo_the_gamer
Stevo_the_gamer

50074

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 49

User Lists: 0

#229 Stevo_the_gamer  Moderator
Member since 2004 • 50074 Posts

great

 

still a shit layout and shit new rules

Lumpy311
I prefer the centered layout like the current forums use and not the full-screen layout the new forums use, but I remember presenting hesitation and skepticism to when Gamespot moved from the old forums to the GS Wide forums. Eventually, you get used to it and start to grow to it.
Avatar image for Lumpy311
Lumpy311

2009

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#230 Lumpy311
Member since 2013 • 2009 Posts

[QUOTE="Lumpy311"]

great

 

still a shit layout and shit new rules

Stevo_the_gamer

I prefer the centered layout like the current forums use and not the full-screen layout the new forums use, but I remember presenting hesitation and skepticism to when Gamespot moved from the old forums to the GS Wide forums. Eventually, you get used to it and start to grow to it.

no

 

this looks like shit and i will always hate it

Avatar image for Jonwh18
Jonwh18

9350

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#231 Jonwh18
Member since 2009 • 9350 Posts

Can we at least call people or things stupid? 

I mean that's like a kindergarten level insult here guys....

Avatar image for Lumpy311
Lumpy311

2009

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#232 Lumpy311
Member since 2013 • 2009 Posts

Can we at least call people or things stupid? 

I mean that's like a kindergarten level insult here guys....

Jonwh18

As i said, this place is going to be boring as fcvk.

Avatar image for Stevo_the_gamer
Stevo_the_gamer

50074

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 49

User Lists: 0

#233 Stevo_the_gamer  Moderator
Member since 2004 • 50074 Posts

no

 

this looks like shit and i will always hate it

Lumpy311

Avatar image for Animal-Mother
Animal-Mother

27362

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#234 Animal-Mother
Member since 2003 • 27362 Posts

I think moderations really depend on context. If you call me an idiot in the midst of a reasonable and on-topic post, I would not personally moderate that. Others might, but I wouldn't. If your entire post is just "you're an idiot" then it would be moderation worthy.

It's all about context, but it's good practice to avoid insults all together.

organic_machine
Isn't that the problem though. When the issue is purely in the eye of the mod?
Avatar image for Badosh
Badosh

12774

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#235 Badosh
Member since 2011 • 12774 Posts

Can we at least call people or things stupid? 

I mean that's like a kindergarten level insult here guys....

Jonwh18
You smell like poop, poopy butt. Take that, meanie.
Avatar image for Dr-FANTASTIC
Dr-FANTASTIC

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#236 Dr-FANTASTIC
Member since 2013 • 25 Posts
So I read this whole thread from the start. Now I have done nothing here mostly other than videos, read reviews, and have a good laugh here and there. But this is insanity. I have never seen a site/building/etc. run by a community with the community's though in mind be turned into something without their actual consent. From what i read it came out of nowhere, and despite the fact that the new site is not here yet the rules start NOW???? It's like saying Fvck you to everyone in that place.
Avatar image for organic_machine
organic_machine

10143

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#237 organic_machine
Member since 2004 • 10143 Posts

[QUOTE="organic_machine"]

I think moderations really depend on context. If you call me an idiot in the midst of a reasonable and on-topic post, I would not personally moderate that. Others might, but I wouldn't. If your entire post is just "you're an idiot" then it would be moderation worthy.

It's all about context, but it's good practice to avoid insults all together.

Animal-Mother

Isn't that the problem though. When the issue is purely in the eye of the mod?

Well it kinda has to be.

Either it's like youtube where anything goes, or we go back to the old old TOU, where the rules were strict and clearly written out.

Every time you try to aim for the middle, there's going to be moderator discretion.

Avatar image for Jonwh18
Jonwh18

9350

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#238 Jonwh18
Member since 2009 • 9350 Posts

[QUOTE="Animal-Mother"][QUOTE="organic_machine"]

I think moderations really depend on context. If you call me an idiot in the midst of a reasonable and on-topic post, I would not personally moderate that. Others might, but I wouldn't. If your entire post is just "you're an idiot" then it would be moderation worthy.

It's all about context, but it's good practice to avoid insults all together.

organic_machine

Isn't that the problem though. When the issue is purely in the eye of the mod?

Well it kinda has to be.

Either it's like youtube where anything goes, or we go back to the old old TOU, where the rules were strict and clearly written out.

Every time you try to aim for the middle, there's going to be moderator discretion.

That's hyperbole and you darn well know it. You makes this place look tame with all of it's spam and hate. 

Avatar image for TheEroica
TheEroica

24432

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#239 TheEroica  Moderator
Member since 2009 • 24432 Posts

[QUOTE="Animal-Mother"][QUOTE="organic_machine"]

I think moderations really depend on context. If you call me an idiot in the midst of a reasonable and on-topic post, I would not personally moderate that. Others might, but I wouldn't. If your entire post is just "you're an idiot" then it would be moderation worthy.

It's all about context, but it's good practice to avoid insults all together.

organic_machine

Isn't that the problem though. When the issue is purely in the eye of the mod?

Well it kinda has to be.

Either it's like youtube where anything goes, or we go back to the old old TOU, where the rules were strict and clearly written out.

Every time you try to aim for the middle, there's going to be moderator discretion.

that fact will unfortunately be the hot bed issue with any new and more strict ToU... Personally, I'd never advocate for more restrictions, in the forums especially, but then again I think we've got some pretty reasonable mods policing system wars. This place will be a shit storm though if people are being modded the way it was back in the day.
Avatar image for organic_machine
organic_machine

10143

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#240 organic_machine
Member since 2004 • 10143 Posts

That's hyperbole and you darn well know it. You makes this place look tame with all of it's spam and hate. Jonwh18

How would you suggest we aim for the middle ground then? Everyone's suggestion will be totally different. Everyone has a different idea of what rules should be and how rules ought to be enforced. Hence, moderator discretion has to exist.

It's impossible to run a forum that the community sees as a balance between rules and freedom without moderator discretion existing in some capacity. Call me crazy, dilutional, or whatever, but it's true.

But what we're trying to achieve with the new rules and site is a better and stronger community. If you have any concerns and criticisms for me, I will be glad to hear them.

Avatar image for TheEroica
TheEroica

24432

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#241 TheEroica  Moderator
Member since 2009 • 24432 Posts

[QUOTE="Stevo_the_gamer"][QUOTE="Lumpy311"]

great

 

still a shit layout and shit new rules

Lumpy311

I prefer the centered layout like the current forums use and not the full-screen layout the new forums use, but I remember presenting hesitation and skepticism to when Gamespot moved from the old forums to the GS Wide forums. Eventually, you get used to it and start to grow to it.

no

 

this looks like shit and i will always hate it

No offense but i can't help but to chuckle at the doomsday vibe over one picture that was posted... Black background looks great, the icons for editing a post actually WORK. There are really great and sensible additions to the way we use the forum and if getting used to a new "look" comes along with a functioning forum that is easy to use then Im on board. Don't get me wrong, I'm not fanboying the new forums... there are things I dont want to lose from this style forum, but if your basing your E-Rage on a single white background, no identity pic then you are placing uneeded anger out there for no reason.
Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#242 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
this is also a response to all the negative feedback about the previous tou.CaseyWegner
Previous before current, or the current one? If current, then that negative feedback was an extreme minority.
Avatar image for TheEroica
TheEroica

24432

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#243 TheEroica  Moderator
Member since 2009 • 24432 Posts
[QUOTE="CaseyWegner"]this is also a response to all the negative feedback about the previous tou.foxhound_fox
Previous before current, or the current one? If current, then that negative feedback was an extreme minority.

The previous ToU was not fun in any capacity... You actually had to proof read your post before posting it, not based on what you said, but whether or not someone could perceive it as offensive... that is NOT a good gamespot. I like what they are doing with the 3 strike policy actually, but the feeling of a looming big brother will not make people happy.
Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#244 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
[QUOTE="TheEroica"] The previous ToU was not fun in any capacity... You actually had to proof read your post before posting it, not based on what you said, but whether or not someone could perceive it as offensive... that is NOT a good gamespot. I like what they are doing with the 3 strike policy actually, but the feeling of a looming big brother will not make people happy.

I'm not sure why they would ban anyone for anything short of criminal threats. to be quite honest. They have no grounds besides "but people's FEEELINGZ!?!?!?!?" to moderate otherwise. The staff of this website shouldn't be trying to protect people from offense. People should know when enough's enough and turn the computer off.
Avatar image for Animal-Mother
Animal-Mother

27362

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#245 Animal-Mother
Member since 2003 • 27362 Posts

[QUOTE="Animal-Mother"][QUOTE="organic_machine"]

I think moderations really depend on context. If you call me an idiot in the midst of a reasonable and on-topic post, I would not personally moderate that. Others might, but I wouldn't. If your entire post is just "you're an idiot" then it would be moderation worthy.

It's all about context, but it's good practice to avoid insults all together.

organic_machine

Isn't that the problem though. When the issue is purely in the eye of the mod?

Well it kinda has to be.

Either it's like youtube where anything goes, or we go back to the old old TOU, where the rules were strict and clearly written out.

Every time you try to aim for the middle, there's going to be moderator discretion.

Doesn't it become an issue though? Also if the new TOU is in effect now. Why can't we have it absolutely written 100% out for us?

Do we have to walk around eggshells until it's officially released?

Avatar image for organic_machine
organic_machine

10143

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#246 organic_machine
Member since 2004 • 10143 Posts

Doesn't it become an issue though? Animal-Mother

It certainly can. I've visited many forums (as well has online game servers) that I felt had those kind of issues.

One of the things I hope to achieve as a moderator going forward is better communication with the users of the site. I want to minimize those potential issues as much as possible. So if you have any concerns of criticisms, PM me.

Avatar image for Lumpy311
Lumpy311

2009

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#247 Lumpy311
Member since 2013 • 2009 Posts

[QUOTE="Lumpy311"]

[QUOTE="Stevo_the_gamer"] I prefer the centered layout like the current forums use and not the full-screen layout the new forums use, but I remember presenting hesitation and skepticism to when Gamespot moved from the old forums to the GS Wide forums. Eventually, you get used to it and start to grow to it.TheEroica

no

 

this looks like shit and i will always hate it

No offense but i can't help but to chuckle at the doomsday vibe over one picture that was posted... Black background looks great, the icons for editing a post actually WORK. There are really great and sensible additions to the way we use the forum and if getting used to a new "look" comes along with a functioning forum that is easy to use then Im on board. Don't get me wrong, I'm not fanboying the new forums... there are things I dont want to lose from this style forum, but if your basing your E-Rage on a single white background, no identity pic then you are placing uneeded anger out there for no reason.

it's shit and i will always hate it

 

This is anti community and everyone knows it.

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#248 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
One of the things I hope to achieve as a moderator going forward is better communication with the users of the site. organic_machine
Sure starting this well. :| This whole load just seems like empty promises. And I can't blame you guys, because you are volunteers and will lose your position if you spill the beans. But hey, if I were in your position and the users were crying out, I'd spill it, I spill it all and GS would have my ass canned and I'd be happy.
Avatar image for TheEroica
TheEroica

24432

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#249 TheEroica  Moderator
Member since 2009 • 24432 Posts
[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"][QUOTE="TheEroica"] The previous ToU was not fun in any capacity... You actually had to proof read your post before posting it, not based on what you said, but whether or not someone could perceive it as offensive... that is NOT a good gamespot. I like what they are doing with the 3 strike policy actually, but the feeling of a looming big brother will not make people happy.

I'm not sure why they would ban anyone for anything short of criminal threats. to be quite honest. They have no grounds besides "but people's FEEELINGZ!?!?!?!?" to moderate otherwise. The staff of this website shouldn't be trying to protect people from offense. People should know when enough's enough and turn the computer off.

well sure... that's true in theory, but I'd gather that Gamespot doesnt want to allow a sess pool reputation build around their forums... That I get, but what doesnt sit well is that restrictions to posting hurts those that are respected among the community, where the trolls getting banned is a dime a dozen. Imagine a well respected community member being modded three times in a 60 day period based on 3 questionable incidents... that's not gonna go well.
Avatar image for Animal-Mother
Animal-Mother

27362

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#250 Animal-Mother
Member since 2003 • 27362 Posts

[QUOTE="Animal-Mother"]Doesn't it become an issue though? organic_machine

It certainly can. I've visited many forums (as well has online game servers) that I felt had those kind of issues.

One of the things I hope to achieve as a moderator going forward is better communication with the users of the site. I want to minimize those potential issues as much as possible. So if you have any concerns of criticisms, PM me.

I absolutely will and not to say i'm choosing sides. You've responded to me twice now. I've read a lot of this thread and you are the mod easily handling this the best I've seen.