"treating it as a 360 exclusive"..... 0rin
*standing ovation* never thought I would ever see such a well-thought out post in SW....ever:)
This topic is locked from further discussion.
"treating it as a 360 exclusive"..... 0rin
*standing ovation* never thought I would ever see such a well-thought out post in SW....ever:)
Sounds like an oxymoron to me.[QUOTE="cainetao11"][QUOTE="Juggernaut140"]
"Noble_Aryan"
WTF? :?
finesse-gamer
sounds like you are just ignorant to me.
if you weren't, you'd know that the true meaning of "aryan" is that its a word to describe Indo-Iranians... the word itself is an english adaptation of the word "Ārya" which means "noble" is sanskrit.
Well that's not what he told me he meant via private message :?"treating it as a 360 exclusive" or, maybe people were using Prototype to make Infamous look like it wasn't worth the hype (back before Infamous came out), and now that it's looking like the opposite is true, then the ones that tried to hype Prototype as better than inFamous are getting owned now.. (silly.. i know. "ownage" psh.) and maybe it just so happens that the majority of people hyping prototype were 360 fanboys, jealous that they couldn't have both, so they felt the need to bash inFamous till the score came out. It's silly to say one game "won" over the other, but it's entirely feasible to say one scored higher, and therefore is going to turn out to be a "better" game (better is a relative and moot term). My question is, why are some people so upset about people bringing this up? Feeling.. ."owned"? or.. what? I personally don't care, neither game really excited me all that much anyway. but it's funny how people are quick to call out other fanboys, and make it sound like they are some kind of seeker of justice, when in fact, they are just being fanboys themselves. Let's face it. Odds are, if you clicked on a link that said "SYSTEM WARS", you're probably a fanboy of some sort, even if you don't want to admit it, just posting here was proof enough. We're all fanboys here, some, more than others.. sure, but fanboys all the same.0rin
i pretty much agree with you, although im not bold enough to say it myself lol
[QUOTE="finesse-gamer"][QUOTE="cainetao11"]Sounds like an oxymoron to me.Juggernaut140
sounds like you are just ignorant to me.
if you weren't, you'd know that the true meaning of "aryan" is that its a word to describe Indo-Iranians... the word itself is an english adaptation of the word "Ārya" which means "noble" is sanskrit.
Well that's not what he told me he meant via private message :?it really doesn't matter.
cainetao11'soriginal statement was ignorant, regardless.
[QUOTE="cainetao11"][QUOTE="Juggernaut140"]
"Noble_Aryan"
WTF? :?
Sounds like an oxymoron to me.sounds like you are just ignorant to me.
if you weren't, you'd know that the true meaning of "aryan" is that its a word to describe Indo-Iranians... the word itself is an english adaptation of the word "?rya" which means "noble" is sanskrit.
My apologies to both of you. I was ignorant of that. Thank you for the information.[QUOTE="finesse-gamer"][QUOTE="cainetao11"]Sounds like an oxymoron to me.cainetao11
sounds like you are just ignorant to me.
if you weren't, you'd know that the true meaning of "aryan" is that its a word to describe Indo-Iranians... the word itself is an english adaptation of the word "?rya" which means "noble" is sanskrit.
My apologies to both of you. I was ignorant of that. Thank you for the information.it's okay, it's a common misconception that has stuck around in society's psyche since adolf hitler started spreading lies.
also, even if he was referring to the everyday use of the word and was talkingabout germanic peoples, there is nothing wrong with being germanic. so i don't know why you would say that at all.... unless you thought it referred to nazis... which is another misconception: not all germans were nazis during WW2. Only a small number were, actually.
why must you post stuff like this? All it does is start a flame war *waits for 360 fanboys and ps3 fanboys to enter the arena*SF_KiLLaMaNin the left corner, we have 8000 cows..... and in the right corner, we have 6 lemmings, because about 60 jumped off a cliff to become cows, and the rest followed, as is their nature.
[QUOTE="stereointegrity"]where is Bioshockownz when u need him hahaaBioShockOwnz
You need me? :oops:
lol yes i do[QUOTE="cainetao11"][QUOTE="finesse-gamer"]
sounds like you are just ignorant to me.
if you weren't, you'd know that the true meaning of "aryan" is that its a word to describe Indo-Iranians... the word itself is an english adaptation of the word "?rya" which means "noble" is sanskrit.
My apologies to both of you. I was ignorant of that. Thank you for the information.it's okay, it's a common misconception that has stuck around in society's psyche since adolf hitler started spreading lies.
also, even if he was referring to the everyday use of the word and was talkingabout germanic peoples, there is nothing wrong with being germanic. so i don't know why you would say that at all.... unless you thought it referred to nazis... which is another misconception: not all germans were nazis during WW2. Only a small number were, actually.
I would say it because in my life the word was always associated with a group who hated and oppressed others. As I said I was ignorant of it's full/ truthful meaning, hence my attempt at amends. Lems, cows, sheep, hermits, in the end we're all human and gamers.I've been reading from a few people who have the game and the graphics are ugly as hell they say.
inFamous FTW
IGN review of Protype: http://xbox360.ign.com/articles/992/992950p1.html .............. It get's 7.5 Compare to Infamous who get 9.2 at IGN, everybody knows that Infamous is much better than Prototype Face it, Wii-owners, NO WII EXCLUSIVE has scored "Editor's Choice" on Gamespot this year!! 360? Well....erm.......it has no games Infamous is the proof that PS3 exclusive can't be killed by multiplatform games!! Soon, PS3 will beat 360 and Wii, I believe in Sonyihsanqueen
i dont know if u know this or not but the game is not selling. they are offering it soon for 29$ for a short period of time so poepl actually buy it.
I was looking forward to this, oh well.
*Back to Sims 3, the forgotten AAAE*
Toriko42
I only quoted this to agree on the sims, such a great game that brought me back to the series.
On topic i agree with all the people viciously saying I TOLD YOU SO, because i did in fact tell you so. It has a awesome concept, but it is porley executed, making it self a generic game that is decent at best, like mercs 2. You can see this from watching any of the gameplay vids.
And it starts. Atleast try to keep it to 1 thread. There's no need for 2.
Why not just be a gamer and choose both?
BioShockOwnz
^^This seems most applicable.
inFAMOUS has been rated as a "Superb" game, however both games will be enjoyable and fun.
This looked one hundred times better than iNFAMOUS. The latter was absolute ****, at least judging from the demo.DeathScape666
I've been trying to explain this to people, Vids just don't convey how a game plays. You can't experience a game through a vid, you can only imagine it.
Companies know that if you slap a "M" Rating, show some sweet gore/action, it will entice a certain number of people.
It's all about the actual reviews, and even much better, actual PLAYTIME with the full games, not demos. :)
This looked one hundred times better than iNFAMOUS. The latter was absolute ****, at least judging from the demo.DeathScape666
Really? I'm enjoying it throughly right now.
Still, different strokes for different folks.
This is stupid. Since when does IGN alone determine whether a game is good or not? Really the only sources that hold ANY weight on SW are Gamespot of course (number 1), followed by metacritic and gamerankings. In fact, every other site I have seen has given it at least a 9/10. Yawn, save the discussion for after GS reviews it, because IGN means squat (IGN gave Assassin's Creed a 7.5 and No More Heroes a 7.8 while GS gave both a 9. They don't always agree). Then if the game flops on GS, do this whole thing, but otherwise, just grow up.mynameisdumbNo one but myself determines whether a game is good or not. As for topic I could care less about Prototype or Infamous.
[QUOTE="ihsanqueen"]IGN review of Protype: http://xbox360.ign.com/articles/992/992950p1.html .............. It get's 7.5 Compare to Infamous who get 9.2 at IGN, everybody knows that Infamous is much better than Prototype Face it, Wii-owners, NO WII EXCLUSIVE has scored "Editor's Choice" on Gamespot this year!! 360? Well....erm.......it has no games Infamous is the proof that PS3 exclusive can't be killed by multiplatform games!! Soon, PS3 will beat 360 and Wii, I believe in Sonyhalo_wars86
i dont know if u know this or not but the game is not selling. they are offering it soon for 29$ for a short period of time so poepl actually buy it.
Lol, what are you talking about? The game's been out like a couple weeks now and has sold almost half a million. I'd say its doing pretty good for an exclusive. There's crap games that've been out for a year now that aren't even as low as $29 yet. That's crazy, dude.[QUOTE="mynameisdumb"]This is stupid. Since when does IGN alone determine whether a game is good or not? Really the only sources that hold ANY weight on SW are Gamespot of course (number 1), followed by metacritic and gamerankings. In fact, every other site I have seen has given it at least a 9/10. Yawn, save the discussion for after GS reviews it, because IGN means squat (IGN gave Assassin's Creed a 7.5 and No More Heroes a 7.8 while GS gave both a 9. They don't always agree). Then if the game flops on GS, do this whole thing, but otherwise, just grow up.shawn7324No one but myself determines whether a game is good or not.. Amen, brotha! I decide wether or not I like a game. However, since the same reviewer gave one game a 9 and the other a 7.5 at least that reviewer's opinion rings loud and clear. I don't expect GS's review to be much more generous.
where is Bioshockownz when u need him hahaastereointegrity
You need me? :oops:
lol yes i do Uh, Sexy!I agree with you:)HAHAHAHAHA who ever though prototype was goin to be even close to infamous deserves to get laughed at
noble_aryan
i dont undestand this thread... there really is no need to proclaim a winner... sure the 2 titles having much in common and being of the same genre one can accept the fact they'll be compared but for PS3 owners shouldnt matter since they can get both..
[QUOTE="Z0MBIES"]Well, time to look for a quality game I passed over in past couple years... at least I'll save some money.SolidTy
or get your AAA 9.0+ Superhero Sandbox fix with InFAMOUS. That was easy. :)
If only I could afford to buy a $400 PS3.... And IGN giving it such a low score is bad, because almost all the time IGN is in the middle of the scoring range and is one of the more trustworthy of reviewing sites, or at least I have pretty much agreed with all their reviews of games I've played.
[QUOTE="ihsanqueen"]IGN review of Protype: http://xbox360.ign.com/articles/992/992950p1.html .............. It get's 7.5 Compare to Infamous who get 9.2 at IGN, everybody knows that Infamous is much better than Prototype Face it, Wii-owners, NO WII EXCLUSIVE has scored "Editor's Choice" on Gamespot this year!! 360? Well....erm.......it has no games Infamous is the proof that PS3 exclusive can't be killed by multiplatform games!! Soon, PS3 will beat 360 and Wii, I believe in Sonyhalo_wars86
i dont know if u know this or not but the game is not selling. they are offering it soon for 29$ for a short period of time so poepl actually buy it.
Where at? What does not selling well have to do with anything with being a great game?
Prototype had the better concept of a superhero sandbox game that just failed to execute. inFamous did.
Have you even played prototype because it's not out yet! Do you favore sometthing just because it's on the system you own?Oh yes, Infamous is better.... in the eyes of the journalists ;)
Personally I prefer Prototype.
-Oath
But how do you know if he could prefer Infamous if he hasn't played that one either?
You do realize that gameplay footage exists of both, he might just find Prototype more interesting.
You realize there are only a few reviews on Prototype and about 100 for infamous with the notorious ps3 exclusive hating edge giving infamous a 7 just like they did with all the other ps3 exclusives just to drive the meta score down....Lets compare this again with both have the same amount of metacritic reviews...right now it means nothing!Infamous: 8.5 Metacritic
Prototype: 8,7-9,1 Metacritc
Sorry cows.
Communistsheep
Infamous: 8.5 Metacritic
Prototype: 8,7-9,1 Metacritc
Sorry cows.
You realize there are only a few reviews on Prototype and about 100 for infamous with the notorious ps3 exclusive hating edge giving infamous a 7 just like they did with all the other ps3 exclusives just to drive the meta score down....Lets compare this again with both have the same amount of metacritic reviews...right now it means nothing! Agreed. I actually think Edge will give Prototype a 6 for the lack of true innovation or some such pretentious BS.Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment