Is Crysis the greatest graphical benchmark? This game says no..[Pix!]

Um have you even played Dirt? It looked good on all platforms but looks the best on PS3 as it is the only platform that can run it at a great framerate. Even the pc version chugs on top of the line cards when set at the same settings as the console version. Polaris_choice

... Hurray for crappy devs that can't properly optimize? Anyway,I haven't seen you around lately. Were you suspended?

[QUOTE="Polaris_choice"]Um have you even played Dirt? It looked good on all platforms but looks the best on PS3 as it is the only platform that can run it at a great framerate. Even the pc version chugs on top of the line cards when set at the same settings as the console version. horrowhip

... Hurray for crappy devs that can't properly optimize? Anyway,I haven't seen you around lately. Were you suspended?

Codemasters is a crappy dev? lol

And no I wasnt supsended im sure someoen will find a way to report me though this forum is full of babies.

Are those environments and models fully destructible? Can you drive anywhere you want? How big are the levels?

Um have you even played Dirt? It looked good on all platforms but looks the best on PS3 as it is the only platform that can run it at a great framerate. Even the pc version chugs on top of the line cards when set at the same settings as the console version.

Polaris_choice

Well, I'm actually still playing it on my PC and enjoying all of its graphical awesomeness that both PS3 and X360 failed to bring.

And about that framerate stuff, well, that's a developer-side crap. It's more commonly known as a bad port.

[QUOTE="ArisShadows"]As great as Crysis looks, its generally bores me with lack of creavity.Meu2k7

And what is creative to you? I dont really see the kind of Crysis Aliens/Enviroments being sued in any other games, or the Nano-suit and so forth ...

To me, the theme just feel too familiar in the alien and localescene.. At least thats my opinion, but we all differ.

[QUOTE="Polaris_choice"]

Um have you even played Dirt? It looked good on all platforms but looks the best on PS3 as it is the only platform that can run it at a great framerate. Even the pc version chugs on top of the line cards when set at the same settings as the console version.

IgGy621985

Well, I'm actually still playing it on my PC and enjoying all of its graphical awesomeness that both PS3 and X360 failed to bring.

And about that framerate stuff, well, that's a developer-side crap. It's more commonly known as a bad port.

Please explain that graphical awesomeness that the pc version brings other then the chugging framerate not found in the PS3 version. Please tell me what that is? Because according to my personal expereince and revewies I really dont know what that graphical awesomness is. Neither does Gamespot hence the reason they said the PS3 version was the best.

[QUOTE="horrowhip"]

[QUOTE="Polaris_choice"]Um have you even played Dirt? It looked good on all platforms but looks the best on PS3 as it is the only platform that can run it at a great framerate. Even the pc version chugs on top of the line cards when set at the same settings as the console version. Polaris_choice

... Hurray for crappy devs that can't properly optimize? Anyway,I haven't seen you around lately. Were you suspended?

Codemasters is a crappy dev? lol

And no I wasnt supsended im sure someoen will find a way to report me though this forum is full of babies.

Codemasters obviously didn't try on the PC version because there is no way in **** that a 7800 GTX should struggle with the game. It's not like it really pushed the PS3(Cell in particular)and the 7800 GTX is a tiny bitbetter than the RSX. Just saying, Codemasters really didn't optimize properly.

[QUOTE="horrowhip"]

[QUOTE="Polaris_choice"]Um have you even played Dirt? It looked good on all platforms but looks the best on PS3 as it is the only platform that can run it at a great framerate. Even the pc version chugs on top of the line cards when set at the same settings as the console version. Polaris_choice

... Hurray for crappy devs that can't properly optimize? Anyway,I haven't seen you around lately. Were you suspended?

Codemasters is a crappy dev? lol

And no I wasnt supsended im sure someoen will find a way to report me though this forum is full of babies.

No way in hell is Codemasters a crappy dev. Overlord was badass.

Here some better pics (i think they arephoto mode though)

Please explain that graphical awesomeness that the pc version brings other then the chugging framerate not found in the PS3 version. Please tell me what that is? Because according to my personal expereince and revewies I really dont know what that graphical awesomness is. Neither does Gamespot hence the reason they said the PS3 version was the best.

Polaris_choice

According to my personal experience, PC version looks best on ultra settings. Ultra. Settings. Ultra settings equals graphical awesomeness. It's that simple.

[QUOTE="Polaris_choice"]

Please explain that graphical awesomeness that the pc version brings other then the chugging framerate not found in the PS3 version. Please tell me what that is? Because according to my personal expereince and revewies I really dont know what that graphical awesomness is. Neither does Gamespot hence the reason they said the PS3 version was the best.

IgGy621985

According to my personal experience, PC version looks best on ultra settings. Ultra. Settings. Ultra settings equals graphical awesomeness. It's that simple.

Its Polaris ... according to him I cant run it at max because of some failed Benchmark, and he expects me to go and download the demo again jsut to prove him wrong :I .... like hell.

[QUOTE="Polaris_choice"]

Please explain that graphical awesomeness that the pc version brings other then the chugging framerate not found in the PS3 version. Please tell me what that is? Because according to my personal expereince and revewies I really dont know what that graphical awesomness is. Neither does Gamespot hence the reason they said the PS3 version was the best.

IgGy621985

According to my personal experience, PC version looks best on ultra settings. Ultra. Settings. Ultra settings equals graphical awesomeness. It's that simple.

LMAO Ultra settings is what the 360 and PS3 version runs it on the only differnce is the PS3 runs it at a steady 30fps never dipping while the 360 constantnly dips and the PC version caps at 44fps and diping below 24fps even on a 8800gtx.

[QUOTE="IgGy621985"][QUOTE="Polaris_choice"]

Please explain that graphical awesomeness that the pc version brings other then the chugging framerate not found in the PS3 version. Please tell me what that is? Because according to my personal expereince and revewies I really dont know what that graphical awesomness is. Neither does Gamespot hence the reason they said the PS3 version was the best.

Meu2k7

According to my personal experience, PC version looks best on ultra settings. Ultra. Settings. Ultra settings equals graphical awesomeness. It's that simple.

Its Polaris ... according to him I cant run it at max because of some failed Benchmark, and he expects me to go and download the demo again jsut to prove him wrong :I .... like hell.

Meku read the benchmarks on the web or better yet read the reviews why is this so hard to understand? The best looking racing game on pc looks better on console and it doesnt matter as there are racing exclusives coming to each console that blow Dirt out of the water.

[QUOTE="IgGy621985"][QUOTE="Polaris_choice"]

Please explain that graphical awesomeness that the pc version brings other then the chugging framerate not found in the PS3 version. Please tell me what that is? Because according to my personal expereince and revewies I really dont know what that graphical awesomness is. Neither does Gamespot hence the reason they said the PS3 version was the best.

Polaris_choice

According to my personal experience, PC version looks best on ultra settings. Ultra. Settings. Ultra settings equals graphical awesomeness. It's that simple.

LMAO Ultra settings is what the 360 and PS3 version runs it on the only differnce is the PS3 runs it at a steady 30fps never dipping while the 360 constantnly dips and the PC version caps at 44fps and diping below 24fps even on a 8800gtx.

You forgot to mention that the PS3 versions has removed world detail to attain the stableframe rate, as mentioned in a couple of reviews.

There you go:

WhySoCry

First of all, thats GT:HD (Basically an upscaled version of GT4)

GT5: Prologue is being built from the ground up for the PS3.

Also, about the rearview mirrors, ever heard of PLACEHOLDERS? Heres a picture from the newest build at tgs, they took out the placeholders in this build.