Is Dead Rising 3 flop on PC (3.0 on GS)?

It's not a flop for PC, it's a flop for GS. While Nick is a good writer it seems he has been influenced by the whole SJW thing and decided to troll us or something.

God forbid someone use the full review scale for once.

Either the first review was too high, or the latest one was too low, no no no no none of this inbetween BS somesing has to give either the Xbone loses here or the PC.

well when GS gave X1 a 7, this doesn't make a whole lot of sense

No logic behind any of it.

why does it ?

The games are the same, apart from the keyboard and mouse control sucks, but using a controller makes it the same as X1 version. Also your not limited to 720p or 900p what ever the X1 runs it at.

There isn't really a definitive version of the game, if you had to pick its PC (higher Res, faster load times with SSD, potential to unlock 60 fps)

You do know what "definitive" means right?

This is incredibly dumb logic. But i'm sorry.

This version comes with all the DLC and has a higher resolution. It got axed by a shitty review, the game didn't change one bit....

Shit. That's worse than Haze or Lair or Ryse. Shit. I'm not sure if it's worse than Lair but shit.

When I first saw that 3/10, I thought because the port was terrible or something but then I checked the review, it was because he didn't like the game -_- then why didn't they let the same reviewer of the Xone version review it? shouldn't the reviewer be a fan of the series at least?

Upon clicking this review I expected the main complaint to be criticizing the title for the poor port quality which appears to have very high system requirements as well as constant crashing for many people.

As stated by others and as I found out myself, this is practically never brought up. It appears to be someone who doesn't understand the concept of exploitation or B-movies attempting to push a left wing agenda on the reader. PC brigade bullshit.

Dead Rising as a series, has been inspired and influenced by these genres. The camp characters, terrible story, dialogue, race stereotypes and deliberately sexualized woman are a purposefully designed part (and appeal) of the product.

If you play this expecting something else, then you're a fucking idiot, basically.

What a dork, dead rising 3 was awesome.

Not everyone wants a super complicated game you have to invest 400 hours into.

Wow is PC ports this terrible?

Playstation Company Would never allow this.

Dead Rising does has a fairly complicated structure though. It is designed so the player can't do every single objective in one play through, all with timers. And multiple endings including fail states.

If you care about that sort of thing, then it can probably quite easily eat up hundreds of hours.

I think I agree with the reviewer opinion here, personally I will knock off 2 points bringing it to 1/10 because the graphics does’not justifies the performance.

Is its perfomance very poor on PC? unoptimised completely?

a 3/10? i think that is being generous. PLayed this atrocity on Xbone and 1/10 is a more accurate score.

And this is why Gamespot's reviews are crap and not worth paying any attention to.

The reviewer should be telling us about how the game performs and if it is of decent build quality. They shouldn't be giving it a bad score because they didn't like it (they are a "professional" reviewer, not some user-review schmoe). I give bad scores to bad games, and decent scores to ones that, while still well-made, I don't like. The sub-50% section of the scale is reserved for truly awful games that aren't even remotely "decent".

At least Tom McShea's SJW reviews were entertaining to read.

I dont get how 28 fps at all times on xbone is better than 34-45-50 fps.

Anyway i also dont get this "improved version" logic because the last of us remaster reviews are freaking identical.

Seems to me like someone didnt like the game at all and reviewed it harshly, seriousl a 3.0? Or someone payed for the game to look bad on pc.

The review was nothing do to with platforms. The young fellow was complaining about the subject matter offending people.

Wait so This guy just in general disliked Dead Rising 3 and based his score off of that?

He had a Bias and Flowed through with it? Can Reviewers do that?

Well the thing called review is dead. Now it is only known as "Opionions".

@uninspiredcup: Can't believe in going to say this, but awesome post!

@uninspiredcup: Even worse, when a game is reviewed i expect it to be reviewed on its subject matter, i cant make reviews and call dark souls crap for being hard.

Only on gamespot, hell at least IGN mentions the optimization issues yet they still enjoyed it.

The reviewer is having a hard time answering on his review page, being questioned by many users lol.

sounds about right to me

HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHA

PC bum race strikes again. xbox one better than a $3,000 rig.

PC will always suck ass.

go start another petition, meanwhile you can enjoy rock simulator on your $3,000 rigs LMFAO

...did you actually read the review?

Simple math will tell you 7>3 lol.....anyway I already cleared up my statement.

3 ?

Hahahaha, Dead Rising 3 is probably the game I've had the most fun with this year.

reported :P

Well if it's anything like past games, I would tend to agree with the 3.0. IMO this franchise is horrible. The open world gets old after about 1 or 2 hours. Story is not worth playing, and the only thing left is a checklist of "creative" weapons or traps to kill zombies. Boring.

I just noticed something weird related to the review score. When has the third game in a series scored a 3.0?

That's a shame.. As a pc gamer I always kept a eye on the Dead Rising series, being one of the few original series created last gen that I enjoyed greatly... And to this point I really can't think of any games quite like it, which is pretty surprising with all the bandwagoning of popular trends by devs and publishers (MOBA's, FPS's, MMO's, etc etc).. Man I wish Capcom had ported the first Dead Rising to the PC..

Wow. A 3 is a little harsh. I don't see it as AAA material, but for fans of the franchise, its a good, serviceable title.

Not really. I would say that it is equally optimized as the XBONE version. There are videos on Youtube were people with HD 7700 gpu's are running the game at around equal detail and performance compared to XBONE. Most of the complaining comes from people with way better hardware that are trying to reach 60fps(the game is apparently made around 30fps) and are having problems. But the game must still have some issue because there are various reports on the steam forums of people with apparently the same hardware getting different performance results. Hopefully CAPCOM will figure it out and patch it.

@gameofthering: no, no bribes for console "exclusive" version review

I played the Xbox One version and the graphics looked so washed out and the gameplay gets old very fast.