This topic is locked from further discussion.
I really don't see why the witcher 3 people say its graphic king. All the graphics look the same and blurry. The water looks terrible especially when you jump in and the water ripples. It looks good but its too samey.
Maybe on console, but on pc it looks just amazing.
Crysis 3 still the graphics king.
Crysis 3 still the graphics king.
That's DOOM. Not Crysis 3.
Stupid, he comparing crysis 3 to doom 4. Facepalm.
Crysis 3 still the graphics king.
That's DOOM. Not Crysis 3.
Crysis 3 still the graphics king.
That's DOOM. Not Crysis 3.
I know I posted two screenshot from both games.
Nothing beats battlefield at the moment when it comes to pure visual fidelity
DOOM has some insane looking effects, and the character models are very detailed.
Some people need to get their eyes checked, or play these games on a proper PC. DOOM and The Witcher 3 look amazing.
Battlefield 1 is graphics king though.
That screenshot doesn't look impressive at all and this is coming from someone who's playing Doom in 4k at max settings at a locked 60FPS. I'll admit that the PC version is amazingly optimized, at max settings 1080p I get around 120 to 140FPS on average.
My main problem is that the textures look kind of blurry/low-res, this is even more evident in your screenshot, aren't you playing on max settings?
Nothing beats battlefield at the moment when it comes to pure visual fidelity
Definitely. This game looks insane.
I am using reshade on top of it, but I might turn the sharpening down a bit.
Nothing beats battlefield at the moment when it comes to pure visual fidelity
Definitely. This game looks insane.
Looks like a bland shooter, Borderlands looks better.
I am using reshade on top of it, but I might turn the sharpening down a bit.
Nothing beats battlefield at the moment when it comes to pure visual fidelity
Definitely. This game looks insane.
I thought yours looked a little different. Mine is just the default without any reshades or anything on ultra. Had to turn down AA, though for maximum frames. Was dipping below 60 at times, and I couldn't have that.
Personally, I find it is hard to say which game is "the best looking game" because of many factors. One of the largest for me is based on the the complexity of the game, the game size and physics.
I mean, if you take Battlefield 4 for example. Let's go with the online in this scenario. We can use the large Golmud map as an example. You have this large, wide open (non-linear) map that allows you to go anywhere and climb all terrain. The map has about 75% destruction ability for trees, shrubs, building. Then we add 64 players with full weapon customization, independent of each player. You have jets, tanks, motorcyles, humvee's, jeeps and helicopters moving about. There are huge backdrops (though the players can't reach those huge backdrops for obvious reasons). So you have all these environmental events going on, server calculations, pushing the destruction to every player's console (it remembers each players different destruction). Then you add the textures and assets in, color pallet, bullet drop, explosions, smoke.
Then you have a looker, like The Order. The game is a cinematic charm. Facial animation during cutscenes is amazing. The art work is beautiful. The attention to detail in the characters clothing is second to none. Each weapon, on the screen during gameplay, his heavily designed and unique. You have a voice cast from Hollywood. But besides exploding red barrels, there is no game destruction. There is only one controllable character on the screen, there is never more than say 10 AI on the screen at once. The game is extremely linear, as in there is no veering off the path. There are no vehicles, no server calculations, no physics outside of the character animations.
Does The Order look better than Battlefield 4? Of course. But there is a reason for that. Multiple reasons when you take into account art style, the artist themselves and the above. So how does one determine what game is better looking than another? I feel that there are multiple things that need to be taken into account before I could say one game is the best looking. To me it would seem more logical to say one game of a comparative gen/size is something we could determine as to what is better or not better looking.
I look at it like this....in order to get 64 on the screen, the character will have to look like this:
If we are going with the linear approach like The Order, we can put 10 characters on the screen that look like this:
Take a look at that game, MAG.....fun game...but have you seen what the environment looks like and the characters when there are 256 people on the screen?
How do you personally determine when a game is the BEST looking?
Log in to comment