Is Halo Wars the worst RTS game this year?

  • 151 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Chaos_HL21
Chaos_HL21

5288

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#51 Chaos_HL21
Member since 2003 • 5288 Posts

As far as I know, the only three RTS released this year were DoW2, ETW and Halo Wars. Halo Wars loses by default.pyromaniac223

Well yeah, Halo Wars is on the console and ETW and DoW2 (I really need to play those, cruse you limited amount offree time)are on the PC of coruse they would be better.

Avatar image for POJO_MOFO
POJO_MOFO

5525

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#52 POJO_MOFO
Member since 2004 • 5525 Posts
I think it is completely unfair to compare a console RTS to a PC RTS like DOW2 or E:TW. There is so many built in disadvantages I dont think they are comparable Also, Red Alert 3 just came out for PS3...
Avatar image for Burnsmiesta
Burnsmiesta

1672

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 Burnsmiesta
Member since 2004 • 1672 Posts

It's selling because it has 'Halo' in it, and I'm willing to bet the majority that actually know it's an RTS just bought it for the mythic map pack.Zoso-8


Well then, you'd be wrong.

Avatar image for NEILMEHTA
NEILMEHTA

525

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#54 NEILMEHTA
Member since 2005 • 525 Posts

I bought halowars expecting a ok game + amazing maps. But I was amazed by how good it is. If you say HW sucks answer the following question: How much have played the game? a) Not at all b) 1-8 missions c) 9-15 missions d) whole campaign + all multiplayer (1v1, 2v2, and 3v3) If your answer is d, you have a right to your opinion. Otherwise, play the ****ing game first.

Avatar image for clembo1990
clembo1990

9976

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 clembo1990
Member since 2005 • 9976 Posts
Two words: End War.
Avatar image for NEILMEHTA
NEILMEHTA

525

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#56 NEILMEHTA
Member since 2005 • 525 Posts
MP is the best part of HW BTW
Avatar image for Stevo_the_gamer
Stevo_the_gamer

50234

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 49

User Lists: 0

#57 Stevo_the_gamer  Moderator
Member since 2004 • 50234 Posts
[QUOTE="POJO_MOFO"]I think it is completely unfair to compare a console RTS to a PC RTS like DOW2 or E:TW. There is so many built in disadvantages I dont think they are comparable Also, Red Alert 3 just came out for PS3...

Except Empire: Total War isn't exactly a complete "RTS" game -- it's a turn based strategy game with RTS elements in it. ;)
Avatar image for aliblabla2007
aliblabla2007

16756

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#58 aliblabla2007
Member since 2007 • 16756 Posts

Two words: End War.clembo1990

RTT.

Avatar image for clembo1990
clembo1990

9976

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 clembo1990
Member since 2005 • 9976 Posts

[QUOTE="clembo1990"]Two words: End War.aliblabla2007

RTT.

TBT turn based trade-in
Avatar image for XxSTILL_BORNxX
XxSTILL_BORNxX

5749

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#60 XxSTILL_BORNxX
Member since 2007 • 5749 Posts

If you want to compare it to other RTS's on PC then, Yes....Not saying that its the worse but i was meaning that you would find better. If not then, no. Its a really good RTS console game.

Avatar image for aliblabla2007
aliblabla2007

16756

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#61 aliblabla2007
Member since 2007 • 16756 Posts

[QUOTE="aliblabla2007"]

[QUOTE="clembo1990"]Two words: End War.clembo1990

RTT.

TBT turn based trade-in

I never said anything about E:TW in this thread.

And even if I may find it to be the best game ever made when I get it, I'd say it wouldn't count in this thread because it's not an RTS.

Of the mentions in this thread, only Dawn of War II and Halo Wars are RTSs. Discounting ports from last year.

Avatar image for Jekken6
Jekken6

2642

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#62 Jekken6
Member since 2008 • 2642 Posts

Compared to PC RTS, like Empire: Total War, it is bad

Avatar image for skrat_01
skrat_01

33767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 skrat_01
Member since 2007 • 33767 Posts
Halo Wars is far from the best strategy game this year. That is a no brainer. The worst? I strongly doubt it.
Avatar image for Nisim19
Nisim19

1002

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 Nisim19
Member since 2008 • 1002 Posts
RA3 is worst
Avatar image for Mehdi1984
Mehdi1984

764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 Mehdi1984
Member since 2006 • 764 Posts
RA3 is worstNisim19
lol, ya right. RA3 was great.
Avatar image for mr_mozilla
mr_mozilla

2381

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 mr_mozilla
Member since 2006 • 2381 Posts
I don't think anyone even expected it to top DoW2 or E:TW, and other than that there isn't anything worth mentioning out, maybe Men of War not sure how that is tho.
Avatar image for SpruceCaboose
SpruceCaboose

24589

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#67 SpruceCaboose
Member since 2005 • 24589 Posts
I am sick of these Halo Wars hate threads. If you can put up evidence that you played it for more than a few minutes, and you have some real complaints about the game, OK, air them. However, it seems like almost all the haters have no idea what they are talking about with the game and are just parroting bits from different reviews.

IMO, Halo Wars is exactly what I wanted (old school, simple RTS like the old PC RTS games like Warcraft) with a bit more (Skirmish and online are amazingly fun).
Avatar image for Mehdi1984
Mehdi1984

764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 Mehdi1984
Member since 2006 • 764 Posts

I am sick of these Halo Wars hate threads. If you can put up evidence that you played it for more than a few minutes, and you have some real complaints about the game, OK, air them. However, it seems like almost all the haters have no idea what they are talking about with the game and are just parroting bits from different reviews.

IMO, Halo Wars is exactly what I wanted (old school, simple RTS like the old PC RTS games like Warcraft) with a bit more (Skirmish and online are amazingly fun).SpruceCaboose

I've already proven I've beaten half the game. On on level 7. There are like... 13 levels total? Whatever level it is where you have to moev the raptors or w/e into the 5 locations to break that big ass energy shield. That's the last one I beat.

Avatar image for mccoyca112
mccoyca112

5434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#69 mccoyca112
Member since 2007 • 5434 Posts

[QUOTE="Zoso-8"]It's selling because it has 'Halo' in it, and I'm willing to bet the majority that actually know it's an RTS just bought it for the mythic map pack.Ross_the_B0SS

I guess it's too hard to believe it's a fun game...oh man, I almost gagged at the idea of it.

Heh, well you'd be hard pressed to say hes lying...& just judging from the demo(Im still thinking about a purchase at bargain bin price) I'd say its fun but so shallow that its hard to take it serious as an rts. Well not as hard as endwar. People are right, that game is even more shallow and very bare bones. What a waste of dev time overall but a nice "foot in the door" approach for a new beginning in rts games.

So Im going to agree with many here and pull the endwar card but halo wars quite frankly isnt too far off.

Avatar image for campzor
campzor

34932

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 campzor
Member since 2004 • 34932 Posts
so far yes.. but i think stormrise will be worse.
Avatar image for xsubtownerx
xsubtownerx

10705

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#71 xsubtownerx
Member since 2007 • 10705 Posts

[QUOTE="SpruceCaboose"]I am sick of these Halo Wars hate threads. If you can put up evidence that you played it for more than a few minutes, and you have some real complaints about the game, OK, air them. However, it seems like almost all the haters have no idea what they are talking about with the game and are just parroting bits from different reviews.

IMO, Halo Wars is exactly what I wanted (old school, simple RTS like the old PC RTS games like Warcraft) with a bit more (Skirmish and online are amazingly fun).Mehdi1984

I've already proven I've beaten half the game. On on level 7. There are like... 13 levels total? Whatever level it is where you have to moev the raptors or w/e into the 5 locations to break that big ass energy shield. That's the last one I beat.

Ok you have officially not experienced Halo Wars to the fullest.
Avatar image for Mehdi1984
Mehdi1984

764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 Mehdi1984
Member since 2006 • 764 Posts

[QUOTE="Mehdi1984"]

[QUOTE="SpruceCaboose"]I am sick of these Halo Wars hate threads. If you can put up evidence that you played it for more than a few minutes, and you have some real complaints about the game, OK, air them. However, it seems like almost all the haters have no idea what they are talking about with the game and are just parroting bits from different reviews.

IMO, Halo Wars is exactly what I wanted (old school, simple RTS like the old PC RTS games like Warcraft) with a bit more (Skirmish and online are amazingly fun).xsubtownerx

I've already proven I've beaten half the game. On on level 7. There are like... 13 levels total? Whatever level it is where you have to moev the raptors or w/e into the 5 locations to break that big ass energy shield. That's the last one I beat.

Ok you have officially not experienced Halo Wars to the fullest.

lmao... what a joke. I played more then half the game, yet it's not enough to give an opinoin on the game? It's not like the game hides it's complexities until the end of the game. 95% of the gameplay is unveiled after level 2.

You're digging.

Avatar image for MBP_King
MBP_King

903

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 MBP_King
Member since 2009 • 903 Posts

End War would take that distinction.

Avatar image for Mehdi1984
Mehdi1984

764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#74 Mehdi1984
Member since 2006 • 764 Posts

End War would take that distinction.

MBP_King
That's a 2008 title.
Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#75 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts
[QUOTE="MBP_King"]

End War would take that distinction.

Mehdi1984
That's a 2008 title.

That's ported to the PC this year and only getting a 6.0, but I see what you're saying.
Avatar image for Mehdi1984
Mehdi1984

764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 Mehdi1984
Member since 2006 • 764 Posts
[QUOTE="Mehdi1984"][QUOTE="MBP_King"]

End War would take that distinction.

mitu123
That's a 2008 title.

That's ported to the PC this year and only getting a 6.0, but I see what you're saying.

It was, however when looking at the entire scope of gaming -- End War came out in 2008. Another version of it came out in 2009. In the same sense, with the release of Ninga Gaiden Simga II, it would not make sense to say it is a competitor for best Action Fighting game. Or in another example, saying that Mass Effect for the PC was a GOTY 2008 contender, or fighting for best RPG of 2008 with Fallout 3. You know what I mean?
Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#77 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts
[QUOTE="Mehdi1984"][QUOTE="mitu123"][QUOTE="Mehdi1984"] That's a 2008 title.

That's ported to the PC this year and only getting a 6.0, but I see what you're saying.

It was, however when looking at the entire scope of gaming -- End War came out in 2008. Another version of it came out in 2009. In the same sense, with the release of Ninga Gaiden Simga II, it would not make sense to say it is a competitor for best Action Fighting game. Or in another example, saying that Mass Effect for the PC was a GOTY 2008 contender, or fighting for best RPG of 2008 with Fallout 3. You know what I mean?

Exactly, plus there needs to be a RTS to score lower than Halo Wars, though that would be difficult for this year.
Avatar image for Span_Argoman
Span_Argoman

39

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#78 Span_Argoman
Member since 2004 • 39 Posts

Just amusing to note how there's a number of people who claim that they don't see Halo Wars on his gamer profile even though it's like the 3rd game shown on that picture. Seems like some of those defending Halo Wars never played it for themselves.

Avatar image for SpruceCaboose
SpruceCaboose

24589

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#79 SpruceCaboose
Member since 2005 • 24589 Posts

lmao... what a joke. I played more then half the game, yet it's not enough to give an opinoin on the game? It's not like the game hides it's complexities until the end of the game. 95% of the gameplay is unveiled after level 2.

You're digging.

Mehdi1984
Not really. In level 2 you are very limited in what you can build and what you can do. Not to mention that without playing Skirmish, co-op, or Online MP you are missing a huge chunk of the game. Would StarCraft still be played today if it only had a single player campaign?

But assuming you played at least a bit of it, what are your complaints that make it a terrible game.
Avatar image for SpruceCaboose
SpruceCaboose

24589

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#80 SpruceCaboose
Member since 2005 • 24589 Posts

Just amusing to note how there's a number of people who claim that they don't see Halo Wars on his gamer profile even though it's like the 3rd game shown on that picture. Seems like some of those defending Halo Wars never played it for themselves.

Span_Argoman
My GamerCard is and always will be in my profile. I don't have a lot of Achievements in HW yet, but that is because I play a lot of MP and Skirmish, and have only got to level 8 in the SP so far.
Avatar image for Mehdi1984
Mehdi1984

764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#81 Mehdi1984
Member since 2006 • 764 Posts

[QUOTE="Mehdi1984"]

lmao... what a joke. I played more then half the game, yet it's not enough to give an opinoin on the game? It's not like the game hides it's complexities until the end of the game. 95% of the gameplay is unveiled after level 2.

You're digging.

SpruceCaboose

Not really. In level 2 you are very limited in what you can build and what you can do. Not to mention that without playing Skirmish, co-op, or Online MP you are missing a huge chunk of the game. Would StarCraft still be played today if it only had a single player campaign?

But assuming you played at least a bit of it, what are your complaints that make it a terrible game.

What? Worst example ever. Starcraft's single player is brilliant. It's multiplayer extended and exploded the game beyond just that. I have played the multiplayer in HW. However, the problem with the game is the extreme simplicity of the core game mechanics. The game mechanics do not change whether you're playing online or single player. It's too darn simple. It's standards are that of Warcraft I -- which was a FANTASTIC game -- however, it's 2009.

Avatar image for Mehdi1984
Mehdi1984

764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#82 Mehdi1984
Member since 2006 • 764 Posts
[QUOTE="Span_Argoman"]

Just amusing to note how there's a number of people who claim that they don't see Halo Wars on his gamer profile even though it's like the 3rd game shown on that picture. Seems like some of those defending Halo Wars never played it for themselves.

SpruceCaboose
My GamerCard is and always will be in my profile. I don't have a lot of Achievements in HW yet, but that is because I play a lot of MP and Skirmish, and have only got to level 8 in the SP so far.

LOL... you're as far as I am in the game, yet you are able to somehow explain to me that I haven't experienced enough of it to make an informed opinion on the game. Brilliant.
Avatar image for Kickinurass
Kickinurass

3357

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#83 Kickinurass
Member since 2005 • 3357 Posts

[QUOTE="SpruceCaboose"][QUOTE="Mehdi1984"]

lmao... what a joke. I played more then half the game, yet it's not enough to give an opinoin on the game? It's not like the game hides it's complexities until the end of the game. 95% of the gameplay is unveiled after level 2.

You're digging.

Mehdi1984

Not really. In level 2 you are very limited in what you can build and what you can do. Not to mention that without playing Skirmish, co-op, or Online MP you are missing a huge chunk of the game. Would StarCraft still be played today if it only had a single player campaign?

But assuming you played at least a bit of it, what are your complaints that make it a terrible game.

What? Worst example ever. Starcraft's single player is brilliant. It's multiplayer extended and exploded the game beyond just that. I have played the multiplayer in HW. However, the problem with the game is the extreme simplicity of the core game mechanics. The game mechanics do not change whether you're playing online or single player. It's too darn simple. It's standards are that of Warcraft I -- which was a FANTASTIC game -- however, it's 2009.

You haven't addressed what makes it a shallow game though. All you've done is say it is simple without giving any evidence as to why you think so.

Even further, you haven't addressed why this game being simple inherently makes it a bad game.

Avatar image for SpruceCaboose
SpruceCaboose

24589

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#84 SpruceCaboose
Member since 2005 • 24589 Posts
[QUOTE="SpruceCaboose"][QUOTE="Mehdi1984"]

lmao... what a joke. I played more then half the game, yet it's not enough to give an opinoin on the game? It's not like the game hides it's complexities until the end of the game. 95% of the gameplay is unveiled after level 2.

You're digging.

Mehdi1984
Not really. In level 2 you are very limited in what you can build and what you can do. Not to mention that without playing Skirmish, co-op, or Online MP you are missing a huge chunk of the game. Would StarCraft still be played today if it only had a single player campaign?

But assuming you played at least a bit of it, what are your complaints that make it a terrible game.

What? Worst example ever. Starcraft's single player is brilliant. It's multiplayer extended and exploded the game beyond just that. I have played the multiplayer in HW. However, the problem with the game is the extreme simplicity of the core game mechanics. The game mechanics do not change whether you're playing online or single player. It's too darn simple.

If you have not played it online, you are missing a huge portion of the game, since the game dynamics in MP are miles different than they are in any of the SP missions. Get a few friends and try a 3 v 3 on Live and watch all the different strats you will see. Its not going to compete with a PC RTS, but that was not the point. It has more than enough strat options. Or try co-op. That changes the dynamic of the game quite well as well.

Its not cool, IMO, to judge a game as a whole when you admit to only having played 1/2 of a portion of the game.
Avatar image for SpruceCaboose
SpruceCaboose

24589

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#85 SpruceCaboose
Member since 2005 • 24589 Posts
[QUOTE="SpruceCaboose"][QUOTE="Span_Argoman"]

Just amusing to note how there's a number of people who claim that they don't see Halo Wars on his gamer profile even though it's like the 3rd game shown on that picture. Seems like some of those defending Halo Wars never played it for themselves.

Mehdi1984
My GamerCard is and always will be in my profile. I don't have a lot of Achievements in HW yet, but that is because I play a lot of MP and Skirmish, and have only got to level 8 in the SP so far.

LOL... you're as far as I am in the game, yet you are able to somehow explain to me that I haven't experienced enough of it to make an informed opinion on the game. Brilliant.

Yeah, I played co-op, I played Skirmish, I have played on Live. My playing time is very high even if I am not any farther than you in SP. You are taking SP as the whole game. Its not. Its not even close to the whole game. If anything, SP is training for MP.
Avatar image for Mehdi1984
Mehdi1984

764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#86 Mehdi1984
Member since 2006 • 764 Posts

You haven't addressed what makes it a shallow game though. All you've done is say it is simple without giving any evidence as to why you think so.

Even further, you haven't addressed why this game being simple inherently makes it a bad game.

Kickinurass
Well the problem is, there isn't much for me to say as the fact is self-evident. I'm not sure how much clearer you want me to be: the core game mechanics are primative and shallow. How much more specific can a guy be? Maybe it's because I'm arguing with people for whom this is their first RTS -- I don't know. If that's the case, sure, I don't expect you to understand.
Avatar image for Mehdi1984
Mehdi1984

764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#87 Mehdi1984
Member since 2006 • 764 Posts
[QUOTE="SpruceCaboose"] Yeah, I played co-op, I played Skirmish, I have played on Live. My playing time is very high even if I am not any farther than you in SP. You are taking SP as the whole game. Its not. Its not even close to the whole game. If anything, SP is training for MP.

Did you have to beat Big Rigs in it's entirety to know the game was awful?
Avatar image for Chaos_HL21
Chaos_HL21

5288

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#88 Chaos_HL21
Member since 2003 • 5288 Posts

[QUOTE="Kickinurass"]

You haven't addressed what makes it a shallow game though. All you've done is say it is simple without giving any evidence as to why you think so.

Even further, you haven't addressed why this game being simple inherently makes it a bad game.

Mehdi1984

Well the problem is, there isn't much for me to say as the fact is self-evident. I'm not sure how much clearer you want me to be: the core game mechanics are primative and shallow. How much more specific can a guy be? Maybe it's because I'm arguing with people for whom this is their first RTS -- I don't know. If that's the case, sure, I don't expect you to understand.

Just because the core game mechanices are simple doesn't mean the game has to be primative or shallow. Halo Wars is not my first RTS, My first RTS was Dune II on the Genesis. Halo Wars is not the best RTS, but it is still a fun RTS to play.

Avatar image for Mehdi1984
Mehdi1984

764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#89 Mehdi1984
Member since 2006 • 764 Posts

[QUOTE="Mehdi1984"][QUOTE="Kickinurass"]

You haven't addressed what makes it a shallow game though. All you've done is say it is simple without giving any evidence as to why you think so.

Even further, you haven't addressed why this game being simple inherently makes it a bad game.

Chaos_HL21

Well the problem is, there isn't much for me to say as the fact is self-evident. I'm not sure how much clearer you want me to be: the core game mechanics are primative and shallow. How much more specific can a guy be? Maybe it's because I'm arguing with people for whom this is their first RTS -- I don't know. If that's the case, sure, I don't expect you to understand.

Just because the core game mechanices are simple doesn't mean the game has to be primative or shallow. Halo Wars is not my first RTS, My first RTS was Dune II on the Genesis. Halo Wars is not the best RTS, but it is still a fun RTS to play.

Eh... what? The core gameplay IS primitive and shallow, which is what in turn makes the game simple.
Avatar image for Kickinurass
Kickinurass

3357

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#90 Kickinurass
Member since 2005 • 3357 Posts

[QUOTE="Kickinurass"]

You haven't addressed what makes it a shallow game though. All you've done is say it is simple without giving any evidence as to why you think so.

Even further, you haven't addressed why this game being simple inherently makes it a bad game.

Mehdi1984

Well the problem is, there isn't much for me to say as the fact is self-evident. I'm not sure how much clearer you want me to be: the core game mechanics are primative and shallow. How much more specific can a guy be? Maybe it's because I'm arguing with people for whom this is their first RTS -- I don't know. If that's the case, sure, I don't expect you to understand.

IF you're implying this is my first RTS's, I've played AoE:2 and 3, EE1 and EE2, AoM and CoH. Not that great, but I have experience with the genre.

I have some gripes with the game - there is some diffuculty in micromanaging your troops without a hotkey-like function. The paintbrush is rather large for my taste. There could be many more units - terrain variation could be more incoporated into the gameplay, among a few other minors problems. You're inability to create a cohesive argument while you claim the game is simple undermines your own points.

Vandalvideo has made many good points as to why he finds the game is shallow. I disagree with him, but if you're going to make the claim I expect some evidence if you want to be taken seriously.

Avatar image for Chaos_HL21
Chaos_HL21

5288

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#91 Chaos_HL21
Member since 2003 • 5288 Posts

[QUOTE="Chaos_HL21"][QUOTE="Mehdi1984"]because I'm arguing with people for whom this is their first RTS -- I don't know. If that's the case, sure, I don't expect you to understand. Mehdi1984

Just because the core game mechanices are simple doesn't mean the game has to be primative or shallow. Halo Wars is not my first RTS, My first RTS was Dune II on the Genesis. Halo Wars is not the best RTS, but it is still a fun RTS to play.

Eh... what? The core gameplay IS primitive and shallow, which is what in turn makes the game simple.

Ok maybe you are focusing on what you see makes the game "primitive". I don't see that. Also you should not make claims that Halo Wars is people's first RTS. Just because people like 'Simple' RTS does not make it their first.

I enjoy Halo Wars alot and my first RTS was Dune II on the Genesis. Which is pretty much the Doom of RTS. Not the first but the game that establishedthe format. So please don't just say Halo Wars is peoples first RTS.

Avatar image for The_Brodeo
The_Brodeo

804

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#92 The_Brodeo
Member since 2009 • 804 Posts

This is a serious discussion. Technically, is Halo Wars the worst RTS game so far this year? worst RTS overall this year?

As far as I can tell, it is. What game specifically is worse then it?

Mehdi1984

From my time with it I believe this could be the worst RTS ever made.

Avatar image for Mehdi1984
Mehdi1984

764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#93 Mehdi1984
Member since 2006 • 764 Posts

[QUOTE="Mehdi1984"][QUOTE="Chaos_HL21"]

Just because the core game mechanices are simple doesn't mean the game has to be primative or shallow. Halo Wars is not my first RTS, My first RTS was Dune II on the Genesis. Halo Wars is not the best RTS, but it is still a fun RTS to play.

Chaos_HL21

Eh... what? The core gameplay IS primitive and shallow, which is what in turn makes the game simple.

Ok maybe you are focusing on what you see makes the game "primitive". I don't see that. Also you should not make claims that Halo Wars is people's first RTS. Just because people like 'Simple' RTS does not make it their first.

I enjoy Halo Wars alot and my first RTS was Dune II on the Genesis. Which is pretty much the Doom of RTS. Not the first but the game that establishedthe format. So please don't just say Halo Wars is peoples first RTS.

I wasn't trying to offend you with that comment. I was being serious, as it's the only way to explain how it isn't self-evident to you as to what I mean. That said, Dune II on the genesis? I know the Dune series very well, however I can't comment on it's console counterpart as it only makes me wonder if IT TOO was stripped down. Sure.... you like simple. Fine. But that doesn't mean it's not primative. Primitive is a subjective label used to imply that one thing is less "sophisticated" or less "advanced" than some other thing. Being a comparative word it is also relative in nature.
Avatar image for halo_wars86
halo_wars86

1505

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#94 halo_wars86
Member since 2009 • 1505 Posts

This is a serious discussion. Technically, is Halo Wars the worst RTS game so far this year? worst RTS overall this year?

As far as I can tell, it is. What game specifically is worse then it?

Mehdi1984

yes it is, whatever make u sleep better

Avatar image for Chaos_HL21
Chaos_HL21

5288

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#95 Chaos_HL21
Member since 2003 • 5288 Posts

I wasn't trying to offend you with that comment. I was being serious, as it's the only way to explain how it isn't self-evident to you as to what I mean. That said, Dune II on the genesis? I know the Dune series very well, however I can't comment on it's console counterpart as it only makes me wonder if IT TOO was stripped down. Sure.... you like simple. Fine. But that doesn't mean it's not primative. Primitive is a subjective label used to imply that one thing is less "sophisticated" or less "advanced" than some other thing. Being a comparative word it is also relative in nature.Mehdi1984

Not sure about the Dune II, but the game was very simple, it came out on 1992 for DOS, and we were in West Germany at the time, and I don't think we ever had the chance to play it. I was able to play it with the Sega Channel, a project for the Genesis that downloads a number of Genesis games every month (kinda like DLC before DLC).

Halo Warsis not as sophisticated as Supreme Commander, but sometimes I don't want to play something like Supreme Commander. Halo Wars could be a fast fun RTS. Like Civ Rev for the consoles. It is simpler than the Civ on the PC. But Civ Rev is still a blast to play.

Avatar image for Mehdi1984
Mehdi1984

764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#96 Mehdi1984
Member since 2006 • 764 Posts

[QUOTE="Mehdi1984"]I wasn't trying to offend you with that comment. I was being serious, as it's the only way to explain how it isn't self-evident to you as to what I mean. That said, Dune II on the genesis? I know the Dune series very well, however I can't comment on it's console counterpart as it only makes me wonder if IT TOO was stripped down. Sure.... you like simple. Fine. But that doesn't mean it's not primative. Primitive is a subjective label used to imply that one thing is less "sophisticated" or less "advanced" than some other thing. Being a comparative word it is also relative in nature.Chaos_HL21

Not sure about the Dune II, but the game was very simple, it came out on 1992 for DOS, and we were in West Germany at the time, and I don't think we ever had the chance to play it. I was able to play it with the Sega Channel, a project for the Genesis that downloads a number of Genesis games every month (kinda like DLC before DLC).

Halo Warsis not as sophisticated as Supreme Commander, but sometimes I don't want to play something like Supreme Commander. Halo Wars could be a fast fun RTS. Like Civ Rev for the consoles. It is simpler than the Civ on the PC. But Civ Rev is still a blast to play.

Yah, Dune II was simple -- for it's time. As such, labeling it primitive would not make sense. Halo Wars came out in 2009, with game mechanics that only rival games released over a decade ago.

Sometimes you want to play a primitive and simple game. I get it. Sometimes I like to play old school games too.

Avatar image for Chaos_HL21
Chaos_HL21

5288

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#97 Chaos_HL21
Member since 2003 • 5288 Posts

[QUOTE="Chaos_HL21"]

[QUOTE="Mehdi1984"]I wasn't trying to offend you with that comment. I was being serious, as it's the only way to explain how it isn't self-evident to you as to what I mean. That said, Dune II on the genesis? I know the Dune series very well, however I can't comment on it's console counterpart as it only makes me wonder if IT TOO was stripped down. Sure.... you like simple. Fine. But that doesn't mean it's not primative. Primitive is a subjective label used to imply that one thing is less "sophisticated" or less "advanced" than some other thing. Being a comparative word it is also relative in nature.Mehdi1984

Not sure about the Dune II, but the game was very simple, it came out on 1992 for DOS, and we were in West Germany at the time, and I don't think we ever had the chance to play it. I was able to play it with the Sega Channel, a project for the Genesis that downloads a number of Genesis games every month (kinda like DLC before DLC).

Halo Warsis not as sophisticated as Supreme Commander, but sometimes I don't want to play something like Supreme Commander. Halo Wars could be a fast fun RTS. Like Civ Rev for the consoles. It is simpler than the Civ on the PC. But Civ Rev is still a blast to play.

Yah, Dune II was simple -- for it's time. As such, labeling it primitive would not make sense. Halo Wars came out in 2009, with game mechanics that only rival games released over a decade ago.

Halo Wars is like Civilization Revolution, It is not as deep as Civilization on the PCs. It is still a blast to play (which got a 9 here). Halo Wars is in the same way, not as deep as stuff on the PC but still is fun to play.

Avatar image for Mehdi1984
Mehdi1984

764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#98 Mehdi1984
Member since 2006 • 764 Posts

[QUOTE="Mehdi1984"][QUOTE="Chaos_HL21"]

Not sure about the Dune II, but the game was very simple, it came out on 1992 for DOS, and we were in West Germany at the time, and I don't think we ever had the chance to play it. I was able to play it with the Sega Channel, a project for the Genesis that downloads a number of Genesis games every month (kinda like DLC before DLC).

Halo Warsis not as sophisticated as Supreme Commander, but sometimes I don't want to play something like Supreme Commander. Halo Wars could be a fast fun RTS. Like Civ Rev for the consoles. It is simpler than the Civ on the PC. But Civ Rev is still a blast to play.

Chaos_HL21

Yah, Dune II was simple -- for it's time. As such, labeling it primitive would not make sense. Halo Wars came out in 2009, with game mechanics that only rival games released over a decade ago.

Halo Wars is like Civilization Revolution, It is not as deep as Civilization on the PCs. It is still a blast to play (which got a 9 here). Halo Wars is in the same way, not as deep as stuff on the PC but still is fun to play.

and Halo Wars got a 6.5 here dawg. Bad comparison.
Avatar image for Chaos_HL21
Chaos_HL21

5288

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#99 Chaos_HL21
Member since 2003 • 5288 Posts

and Halo Wars got a 6.5 here dawg. Bad comparison.Mehdi1984

Ok let me admend that. Civ Rev got a 9 on Gamespot, but on Metacritic it has a 84. Halo Wars got a 6.5 here, but on Metacritic it has a 82. Gamespot only matters in cases of flops on System Wars. To me their reviews seems to go down hill (but that seems to be true for most review sites, such as Disgaea 3 )

Avatar image for Mehdi1984
Mehdi1984

764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#100 Mehdi1984
Member since 2006 • 764 Posts

[QUOTE="Mehdi1984"] and Halo Wars got a 6.5 here dawg. Bad comparison.Chaos_HL21

Ok let me admend that. Civ Rev got a 9 on Gamespot, but on Metacritic it has a 84. Halo Wars got a 6.5 here, but on Metacritic it has a 82. Gamespot only matters in cases of flops on System Wars. To me their reviews seems to go down hill (but that seems to be true for most review sites, such as Disgaea 3 )

Let me ask you this. Is Halo Wars the worst RTS so far this year?