Is It Safe To Declare X360 As The Most Powerful Console This Gen?

  • 60 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Mystery_Writer
Mystery_Writer

8351

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#1 Mystery_Writer
Member since 2004 • 8351 Posts

do you think it earned that title by now? I mean, on the account that almost all the multiplats are scoring better on X360?

Or multiplat comparison isn't the deciding factor on which console is more powerful?

Avatar image for organic_machine
organic_machine

10143

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#2 organic_machine
Member since 2004 • 10143 Posts

do you think it earned that title by now? I mean, on the account that almost all the multiplats are scoring better on X360?

Or multiplat comparision isn't the deciding factor on which console is more powerful?

Mystery_Writer

 

most powerful? how do you figure?

Avatar image for TekkenMaster606
TekkenMaster606

10980

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#3 TekkenMaster606
Member since 2006 • 10980 Posts
Considering that the Xbox platform launched with it's best game (Halo), and the fact that Microsoft continually got it's butt handed to them from 2001 up until the launch of the Xbox 360, the expectations and scoring standards for that platform may be a bit lower than the Playstation format.
Avatar image for subject117
subject117

4824

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#4 subject117
Member since 2002 • 4824 Posts

do you think it earned that title by now? I mean, on the account that almost all the multiplats are scoring better on X360?

Or multiplat comparision isn't the deciding factor on which console is more powerful?

Mystery_Writer
No. PS3 is obviously more powerful. Oblivion is one example. Wait until MGS, FFXIII or Gran Turismo.
Avatar image for Mystery_Writer
Mystery_Writer

8351

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#5 Mystery_Writer
Member since 2004 • 8351 Posts
[QUOTE="Mystery_Writer"]

do you think it earned that title by now? I mean, on the account that almost all the multiplats are scoring better on X360?

Or multiplat comparision isn't the deciding factor on which console is more powerful?

organic_machine

most powerful? how do you figure?

on the account that X360 > PS3 when it comes to multiplats?
Avatar image for The_Game21x
The_Game21x

26440

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#6 The_Game21x
Member since 2005 • 26440 Posts

Too early. The PS3 hasn't had enough time to be tapped yet

Avatar image for Mystery_Writer
Mystery_Writer

8351

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#7 Mystery_Writer
Member since 2004 • 8351 Posts
[QUOTE="Mystery_Writer"]

do you think it earned that title by now? I mean, on the account that almost all the multiplats are scoring better on X360?

Or multiplat comparision isn't the deciding factor on which console is more powerful?

subject117
No. PS3 is obviously more powerful. Oblivion is one example. Wait until MGS, FFXIII or Gran Turismo.

but didn't the developers worked tirelessly for 1 year just to make it look as good as the X360 version?
Avatar image for The_Game21x
The_Game21x

26440

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#8 The_Game21x
Member since 2005 • 26440 Posts

Considering that the Xbox platform launched with it's best game (Halo), and the fact that Microsoft continually got it's butt handed to them from 2001 up until the launch of the Xbox 360, the expectations and scoring standards for that platform may be a bit lower than the Playstation format. TekkenMaster606

And what exactly does that have to do with the differences in power between the Xbox 360 and PS3? :?

Avatar image for Tylendal
Tylendal

14681

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#9 Tylendal
Member since 2006 • 14681 Posts
[QUOTE="organic_machine"][QUOTE="Mystery_Writer"]

do you think it earned that title by now? I mean, on the account that almost all the multiplats are scoring better on X360?

Or multiplat comparision isn't the deciding factor on which console is more powerful?

Mystery_Writer

most powerful? how do you figure?

on the account that X360 > PS3 when it comes to multiplats?

That's no way to prove which is better. In reality, the 360 has a slightly better GPU, but the PS3's CPU is far superior. (Hope that means something to you, because it's all greek to me :?)
Avatar image for tango90101
tango90101

5977

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 tango90101
Member since 2006 • 5977 Posts

easily the most powerful.

the ps3's "power" is on paper using benchmarks never achieved in realworld applications... but it does make for some spiffy sounding hype with "TEH CELL"...

it has almost the same ring as "TEH EMOTION ENGINE"...:lol:

Avatar image for Ibacai
Ibacai

14459

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#11 Ibacai
Member since 2006 • 14459 Posts
[QUOTE="organic_machine"][QUOTE="Mystery_Writer"]

do you think it earned that title by now? I mean, on the account that almost all the multiplats are scoring better on X360?

Or multiplat comparision isn't the deciding factor on which console is more powerful?

Mystery_Writer

most powerful? how do you figure?

on the account that X360 > PS3 when it comes to multiplats?

That's not so true lately, with Virtua Tennis and Oblivion.
Avatar image for onewiththegame
onewiththegame

4415

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 onewiththegame
Member since 2004 • 4415 Posts

Considering that the Xbox platform launched with it's best game (Halo), and the fact that Microsoft continually got it's butt handed to them from 2001 up until the launch of the Xbox 360, the expectations and scoring standards for that platform may be a bit lower than the Playstation format. TekkenMaster606

 

sorry man but thats DC

 

 

Avatar image for ramey70
ramey70

4002

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 ramey70
Member since 2006 • 4002 Posts
[QUOTE="Mystery_Writer"][QUOTE="organic_machine"][QUOTE="Mystery_Writer"]

do you think it earned that title by now? I mean, on the account that almost all the multiplats are scoring better on X360?

Or multiplat comparision isn't the deciding factor on which console is more powerful?

Ibacai

most powerful? how do you figure?

on the account that X360 > PS3 when it comes to multiplats?

That's not so true lately, with Virtua Tennis and Oblivion.

And NCAA Hoops 2k7
Avatar image for joeblak
joeblak

5474

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 joeblak
Member since 2005 • 5474 Posts
[QUOTE="Mystery_Writer"][QUOTE="organic_machine"][QUOTE="Mystery_Writer"]

do you think it earned that title by now? I mean, on the account that almost all the multiplats are scoring better on X360?

Or multiplat comparision isn't the deciding factor on which console is more powerful?

Ibacai

 

most powerful? how do you figure?

on the account that X360 > PS3 when it comes to multiplats?

That's not so true lately, with Virtua Tennis and Oblivion.

???

 

Virtua Tennis and Oblivion both scored higher on the X360. 

Avatar image for OhhSnap50893
OhhSnap50893

27110

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#15 OhhSnap50893
Member since 2006 • 27110 Posts
[QUOTE="organic_machine"][QUOTE="Mystery_Writer"]

do you think it earned that title by now? I mean, on the account that almost all the multiplats are scoring better on X360?

Or multiplat comparision isn't the deciding factor on which console is more powerful?

Mystery_Writer

most powerful? how do you figure?

on the account that X360 > PS3 when it comes to multiplats?

Gears of War was the big game that took the 360 over the top. That came out pretty much a year after the 360 released. A month before GeOW released, the 360 was a bit of a laughing stock. You can't judge the PS3 yet when at this time it was in the same situation the 360 was in.
Avatar image for ramey70
ramey70

4002

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 ramey70
Member since 2006 • 4002 Posts
[QUOTE="Ibacai"][QUOTE="Mystery_Writer"][QUOTE="organic_machine"][QUOTE="Mystery_Writer"]

do you think it earned that title by now? I mean, on the account that almost all the multiplats are scoring better on X360?

Or multiplat comparision isn't the deciding factor on which console is more powerful?

joeblak

most powerful? how do you figure?

on the account that X360 > PS3 when it comes to multiplats?

That's not so true lately, with Virtua Tennis and Oblivion.

???

Virtua Tennis and Oblivion both scored higher on the X360.

Virtua Tennis did due to online play, and Oblivion because it was released a year earlier. I do prefer Oblivion on the 360 however. Can't really say why, maybe it's just because I played it on it first.
Avatar image for Mystery_Writer
Mystery_Writer

8351

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#17 Mystery_Writer
Member since 2004 • 8351 Posts
Considering that the Xbox platform launched with it's best game (Halo), and the fact that Microsoft continually got it's butt handed to them from 2001 up until the launch of the Xbox 360, the expectations and scoring standards for that platform may be a bit lower than the Playstation format. TekkenMaster606
so, for instance, multiplat games lacking online on the PS3 version has nothing to do with them getting lower score on that platform?
Avatar image for organic_machine
organic_machine

10143

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#18 organic_machine
Member since 2004 • 10143 Posts
[QUOTE="organic_machine"][QUOTE="Mystery_Writer"]

do you think it earned that title by now? I mean, on the account that almost all the multiplats are scoring better on X360?

Or multiplat comparision isn't the deciding factor on which console is more powerful?

Mystery_Writer

 

most powerful? how do you figure?

on the account that X360 > PS3 when it comes to multiplats?

That is the fault of the developer and not the system. Frankly, I think that Sony AND Microsoft both did horrible jobs when designing their consoles. I am surpised at sony because PS1 and PS2 were great machines for their day. Microsoft has been making crappy hardware since the late 80's

Avatar image for wooooode
wooooode

16666

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#19 wooooode
Member since 2002 • 16666 Posts
[QUOTE="Mystery_Writer"]

do you think it earned that title by now? I mean, on the account that almost all the multiplats are scoring better on X360?

Or multiplat comparision isn't the deciding factor on which console is more powerful?

subject117
No. PS3 is obviously more powerful. Oblivion is one example. Wait until MGS, FFXIII or Gran Turismo.

Oblivion is a poor choice because with another year it would look good on the Wii. But the 360 has a better GPU, but the PS3 has a way better CPU which makes the PS3 stronger. Though it seems like the 360 is alot easier to develope for so it evens out.
Avatar image for joeblak
joeblak

5474

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 joeblak
Member since 2005 • 5474 Posts
[QUOTE="joeblak"][QUOTE="Ibacai"][QUOTE="Mystery_Writer"][QUOTE="organic_machine"][QUOTE="Mystery_Writer"]

do you think it earned that title by now? I mean, on the account that almost all the multiplats are scoring better on X360?

Or multiplat comparision isn't the deciding factor on which console is more powerful?

ramey70

 

most powerful? how do you figure?

on the account that X360 > PS3 when it comes to multiplats?

That's not so true lately, with Virtua Tennis and Oblivion.

???

 

Virtua Tennis and Oblivion both scored higher on the X360.

Virtua Tennis did due to online play, and Oblivion because it was released a year earlier. I do prefer Oblivion on the 360 however. Can't really say why, maybe it's just because I played it on it first.

 That will be a common occurrence this generation.

Avatar image for deadmeat59
deadmeat59

8981

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#21 deadmeat59
Member since 2003 • 8981 Posts
ps3 7 cores are 3.2ghz 360 3 core 3.2ghz 7x3.2= 22.4 3x3.2=9.6
Avatar image for D0013ER
D0013ER

3765

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 D0013ER
Member since 2007 • 3765 Posts

Gears of War was the big game that took the 360 over the top. That came out pretty much a year after the 360 released. A month before GeOW released, the 360 was a bit of a laughing stock. You can't judge the PS3 yet when at this time it was in the same situation the 360 was in.

I wouldn't say the 360 was necessarily a laughing stock, it was pumping out solid games fairly regularly, just nothing that could have been considered a breakout hit for the next generation.
Avatar image for Ibacai
Ibacai

14459

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#23 Ibacai
Member since 2006 • 14459 Posts
[QUOTE="subject117"][QUOTE="Mystery_Writer"]

do you think it earned that title by now? I mean, on the account that almost all the multiplats are scoring better on X360?

Or multiplat comparision isn't the deciding factor on which console is more powerful?

wooooode
No. PS3 is obviously more powerful. Oblivion is one example. Wait until MGS, FFXIII or Gran Turismo.

Oblivion is a poor choice because with another year it would look good on the Wii. But the 360 has a better GPU, but the PS3 has a way better CPU which makes the PS3 stronger. Though it seems like the 360 is alot easier to develope for so it evens out.

And there you have hit the nail on the head (Posted this before). The PS3 has a higher peak performance but it's much harder to reach then the 360's. So it's not cost efficient to really push the hardware on a multiplat just yet.
Avatar image for Metrovania
Metrovania

2540

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#24 Metrovania
Member since 2003 • 2540 Posts
No... the PS3 looks more powerful atm. Look at the PS3 version of Oblivion; it looks considerably better.
Avatar image for shadow_lord_11
shadow_lord_11

20792

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#25 shadow_lord_11
Member since 2004 • 20792 Posts
Considering that the Xbox platform launched with it's best game (Halo), and the fact that Microsoft continually got it's butt handed to them from 2001 up until the launch of the Xbox 360, the expectations and scoring standards for that platform may be a bit lower than the Playstation format. TekkenMaster606
Avatar image for Mystery_Writer
Mystery_Writer

8351

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#26 Mystery_Writer
Member since 2004 • 8351 Posts
btw, I remember Virtua Tennis being announced first for the PS3. Does that mean it was originally developed for PS3 and ported to X360?
Avatar image for TyrantDragon55
TyrantDragon55

6851

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#27 TyrantDragon55
Member since 2004 • 6851 Posts
[QUOTE="Mystery_Writer"][QUOTE="organic_machine"][QUOTE="Mystery_Writer"]

do you think it earned that title by now? I mean, on the account that almost all the multiplats are scoring better on X360?

Or multiplat comparision isn't the deciding factor on which console is more powerful?

Tylendal

 

most powerful? how do you figure?

on the account that X360 > PS3 when it comes to multiplats?

That's no way to prove which is better. In reality, the 360 has a slightly better GPU, but the PS3's CPU is far superior. (Hope that means something to you, because it's all greek to me :?)

This is true, however, having a far supperior CPU doesn't really mean much when that CPU only has access to 256 MBs of RAM.

Avatar image for TekkenMaster606
TekkenMaster606

10980

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#28 TekkenMaster606
Member since 2006 • 10980 Posts

[QUOTE="TekkenMaster606"]Considering that the Xbox platform launched with it's best game (Halo), and the fact that Microsoft continually got it's butt handed to them from 2001 up until the launch of the Xbox 360, the expectations and scoring standards for that platform may be a bit lower than the Playstation format. The_Game21x

And what exactly does that have to do with the differences in power between the Xbox 360 and PS3? :?

 

Nothing, but is has everything to do with scoring standards. Gamespot, and other websites more than likely compare their experiences from Sony or Microsofts previous consoles when gauging their personal enjoyments and satisfaction out of the current generation. When they fired up Perfect Dark Zero, what else did you have to compare to? Nothing really, except maybe some of the previous games you enjoyed on the previous version of the Xbox. When it comes to the Playstation 3, well, a lot of media outlets may still be expecting Sony to deliver on those E3 2005 targets and promises. 

 

Just something to think about the next time someone claims that because a multiplatform on the Xbox 360 outscored it's Playstation 3 counterpart by a couple tenths of a point.  

Avatar image for The_Game21x
The_Game21x

26440

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#29 The_Game21x
Member since 2005 • 26440 Posts

ps3 7 cores are 3.2ghz 360 3 core 3.2ghz 7x3.2= 22.4 3x3.2=9.6deadmeat59

Boy are you massively misinformed.

SPE's are not cores. They are specialized processors made for processing highyl complex math quickly. The PS3 has one  3.2 Ghz core and 7 SPE's. The 360 has 3 cores clocked at 3.2 Ghz.

Avatar image for K4ss3r
K4ss3r

8697

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#30 K4ss3r
Member since 2004 • 8697 Posts
[QUOTE="Mystery_Writer"]

do you think it earned that title by now? I mean, on the account that almost all the multiplats are scoring better on X360?

Or multiplat comparision isn't the deciding factor on which console is more powerful?

subject117
No. PS3 is obviously more powerful. Oblivion is one example. Wait until MGS, FFXIII or Gran Turismo.

Wait, wait and wait.. That's the only thing we hear from Sony fanboys.
Avatar image for Donkey_Puncher
Donkey_Puncher

5083

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 Donkey_Puncher
Member since 2005 • 5083 Posts

the PS3 and Xbox 360 will be so close to each other in graphics it won't be worth fighting over.

It will all come down to games and price, which at this point and time (and future IMO) the Xbox 360 already has it beat.

Graphics havne't decided the winners of the last two gens, so why would it now?

Avatar image for The_Game21x
The_Game21x

26440

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#32 The_Game21x
Member since 2005 • 26440 Posts
[QUOTE="The_Game21x"]

[QUOTE="TekkenMaster606"]Considering that the Xbox platform launched with it's best game (Halo), and the fact that Microsoft continually got it's butt handed to them from 2001 up until the launch of the Xbox 360, the expectations and scoring standards for that platform may be a bit lower than the Playstation format. TekkenMaster606

And what exactly does that have to do with the differences in power between the Xbox 360 and PS3? :?

 

Nothing, but is has everything to do with scoring standards. Gamespot, and other websites more than likely compare their experiences from Sony or Microsofts previous consoles when gauging their personal enjoyments and satisfaction out of the current generation. When they fired up Perfect Dark Zero, what else did you have to compare to? Nothing really, except maybe some of the previous games you enjoyed on the previous version of the Xbox. When it comes to the Playstation 3, well, a lot of media outlets may still be expecting Sony to deliver on those E3 2005 targets and promises. 

 

Just something to think about the next time someone claims that because a multiplatform on the Xbox 360 outscored it's Playstation 3 counterpart by a couple tenths of a point.  

Umm...as nicely worded as that was, it still has absolutely nothing to do with the topic at hand...

Avatar image for Mystery_Writer
Mystery_Writer

8351

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#33 Mystery_Writer
Member since 2004 • 8351 Posts

No... the PS3 looks more powerful atm. Look at the PS3 version of Oblivion; it looks considerably better.Metrovania
I wonder if there are other mulitplats out there we can compare. Do you know, by any chance, if such other multiplats exist? You know, like some other ones to compare without the one year advantage?

Avatar image for onewiththegame
onewiththegame

4415

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 onewiththegame
Member since 2004 • 4415 Posts
[QUOTE="Mystery_Writer"][QUOTE="organic_machine"][QUOTE="Mystery_Writer"]

do you think it earned that title by now? I mean, on the account that almost all the multiplats are scoring better on X360?

Or multiplat comparision isn't the deciding factor on which console is more powerful?

OhhSnap50893

 

most powerful? how do you figure?

on the account that X360 > PS3 when it comes to multiplats?

Gears of War was the big game that took the 360 over the top. That came out pretty much a year after the 360 released. A month before GeOW released, the 360 was a bit of a laughing stock. You can't judge the PS3 yet when at this time it was in the same situation the 360 was in.

man you have a bad memory

OB and GRAW both out before GeoW and both AAA

you are right cow's still made fun of the system and now you know

why they are hearing it now

can't take it dont dish it

 

 

Avatar image for TekkenMaster606
TekkenMaster606

10980

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#36 TekkenMaster606
Member since 2006 • 10980 Posts
[QUOTE="TekkenMaster606"][QUOTE="The_Game21x"]

[QUOTE="TekkenMaster606"]Considering that the Xbox platform launched with it's best game (Halo), and the fact that Microsoft continually got it's butt handed to them from 2001 up until the launch of the Xbox 360, the expectations and scoring standards for that platform may be a bit lower than the Playstation format. The_Game21x

And what exactly does that have to do with the differences in power between the Xbox 360 and PS3? :?

 

Nothing, but is has everything to do with scoring standards. Gamespot, and other websites more than likely compare their experiences from Sony or Microsofts previous consoles when gauging their personal enjoyments and satisfaction out of the current generation. When they fired up Perfect Dark Zero, what else did you have to compare to? Nothing really, except maybe some of the previous games you enjoyed on the previous version of the Xbox. When it comes to the Playstation 3, well, a lot of media outlets may still be expecting Sony to deliver on those E3 2005 targets and promises.

 

Just something to think about the next time someone claims that because a multiplatform on the Xbox 360 outscored it's Playstation 3 counterpart by a couple tenths of a point.

Umm...as nicely worded as that was, it still has absolutely nothing to do with the topic at hand...

 

The second sentence in the original post mentions better multiplatforms on the Xbox 360. Figured I would point out that the standards are completely different.  

Avatar image for Mystery_Writer
Mystery_Writer

8351

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#37 Mystery_Writer
Member since 2004 • 8351 Posts
[QUOTE="The_Game21x"]

[QUOTE="TekkenMaster606"]Considering that the Xbox platform launched with it's best game (Halo), and the fact that Microsoft continually got it's butt handed to them from 2001 up until the launch of the Xbox 360, the expectations and scoring standards for that platform may be a bit lower than the Playstation format. TekkenMaster606

And what exactly does that have to do with the differences in power between the Xbox 360 and PS3? :?

Nothing, but is has everything to do with scoring standards. Gamespot, and other websites more than likely compare their experiences from Sony or Microsofts previous consoles when gauging their personal enjoyments and satisfaction out of the current generation. When they fired up Perfect Dark Zero, what else did you have to compare to? Nothing really, except maybe some of the previous games you enjoyed on the previous version of the Xbox. When it comes to the Playstation 3, well, a lot of media outlets may still be expecting Sony to deliver on those E3 2005 targets and promises.

Just something to think about the next time someone claims that because a multiplatform on the Xbox 360 outscored it's Playstation 3 counterpart by a couple tenths of a point.

so you mean, for instance, GS didn't score Virtua Tennis lower because the lack of online compared to X360?
Avatar image for tocool340
tocool340

21697

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#38 tocool340
Member since 2004 • 21697 Posts
I believe ps3 is more powerful. but both consoles have their unique abiility to produce things better to make themselves different from each other.......
Avatar image for TekkenMaster606
TekkenMaster606

10980

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#39 TekkenMaster606
Member since 2006 • 10980 Posts
[QUOTE="TekkenMaster606"][QUOTE="The_Game21x"]

[QUOTE="TekkenMaster606"]Considering that the Xbox platform launched with it's best game (Halo), and the fact that Microsoft continually got it's butt handed to them from 2001 up until the launch of the Xbox 360, the expectations and scoring standards for that platform may be a bit lower than the Playstation format. Mystery_Writer

And what exactly does that have to do with the differences in power between the Xbox 360 and PS3? :?

 

Nothing, but is has everything to do with scoring standards. Gamespot, and other websites more than likely compare their experiences from Sony or Microsofts previous consoles when gauging their personal enjoyments and satisfaction out of the current generation. When they fired up Perfect Dark Zero, what else did you have to compare to? Nothing really, except maybe some of the previous games you enjoyed on the previous version of the Xbox. When it comes to the Playstation 3, well, a lot of media outlets may still be expecting Sony to deliver on those E3 2005 targets and promises.

 

Just something to think about the next time someone claims that because a multiplatform on the Xbox 360 outscored it's Playstation 3 counterpart by a couple tenths of a point.

so you mean, for instance, GS didn't score Virtua Tennis lower because the lack of online compared to X360?

 

I'm sure it did, but don't you think that if the standards are the same, the lack of online would drive that score farther down? Lack of online and it only scored .2 of a point less. 

Avatar image for onewiththegame
onewiththegame

4415

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 onewiththegame
Member since 2004 • 4415 Posts
[QUOTE="The_Game21x"][QUOTE="TekkenMaster606"][QUOTE="The_Game21x"]

[QUOTE="TekkenMaster606"]Considering that the Xbox platform launched with it's best game (Halo), and the fact that Microsoft continually got it's butt handed to them from 2001 up until the launch of the Xbox 360, the expectations and scoring standards for that platform may be a bit lower than the Playstation format. TekkenMaster606

And what exactly does that have to do with the differences in power between the Xbox 360 and PS3? :?

 

Nothing, but is has everything to do with scoring standards. Gamespot, and other websites more than likely compare their experiences from Sony or Microsofts previous consoles when gauging their personal enjoyments and satisfaction out of the current generation. When they fired up Perfect Dark Zero, what else did you have to compare to? Nothing really, except maybe some of the previous games you enjoyed on the previous version of the Xbox. When it comes to the Playstation 3, well, a lot of media outlets may still be expecting Sony to deliver on those E3 2005 targets and promises.

 

Just something to think about the next time someone claims that because a multiplatform on the Xbox 360 outscored it's Playstation 3 counterpart by a couple tenths of a point.

Umm...as nicely worded as that was, it still has absolutely nothing to do with the topic at hand...

 

The second sentence in the original post mentions better multiplatforms on the Xbox 360. Figured I would point out that the standards are completely different.  

Link??

 no link no proof

 

 

 

Avatar image for ambesound
ambesound

160

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 ambesound
Member since 2006 • 160 Posts
The PS3 probably has slightly inferior GPU than the 360, but there isn't much in it. The Cell however is more powerful than the 360 CPU by quite some margin. At the moment the best example of this is Warhawk, the amount of stuff going on in the game is immense. I have yet to see as many things going on in one screen on a 360, even if it's graphics are better.
Avatar image for cmr_ps3
cmr_ps3

410

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 cmr_ps3
Member since 2005 • 410 Posts

do you think it earned that title by now? I mean, on the account that almost all the multiplats are scoring better on X360?

Or multiplat comparison isn't the deciding factor on which console is more powerful?

Mystery_Writer

sounds to me like you're just a fanboy, but in my opinion you can't really tell yet some multiplat games do look better on the 360 but others don't and oblivion is not just as good as the 360's, it's better, just like the devs had a year to learn how to do games on the 360 they have to learn how to use the ps3's power, but there both great systems so whoever wins i win because i just wanna play good games it doesn't matter what console it's on.

Avatar image for The_Game21x
The_Game21x

26440

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#43 The_Game21x
Member since 2005 • 26440 Posts
[QUOTE="The_Game21x"][QUOTE="TekkenMaster606"][QUOTE="The_Game21x"]

[QUOTE="TekkenMaster606"]Considering that the Xbox platform launched with it's best game (Halo), and the fact that Microsoft continually got it's butt handed to them from 2001 up until the launch of the Xbox 360, the expectations and scoring standards for that platform may be a bit lower than the Playstation format. TekkenMaster606

And what exactly does that have to do with the differences in power between the Xbox 360 and PS3? :?

 

Nothing, but is has everything to do with scoring standards. Gamespot, and other websites more than likely compare their experiences from Sony or Microsofts previous consoles when gauging their personal enjoyments and satisfaction out of the current generation. When they fired up Perfect Dark Zero, what else did you have to compare to? Nothing really, except maybe some of the previous games you enjoyed on the previous version of the Xbox. When it comes to the Playstation 3, well, a lot of media outlets may still be expecting Sony to deliver on those E3 2005 targets and promises.

 

Just something to think about the next time someone claims that because a multiplatform on the Xbox 360 outscored it's Playstation 3 counterpart by a couple tenths of a point.

Umm...as nicely worded as that was, it still has absolutely nothing to do with the topic at hand...

 

The second sentence in the original post mentions better multiplatforms on the Xbox 360. Figured I would point out that the standards are completely different.  

Standards are completely different between the Xbox 360 and PS3? I don't think so. There are reasons why multiplats on the Xbox 360 outscored the same multiplats on the PS3, and no, the "standards" are not among those reasons. Virtua Tennis scored lower because there's no online play. Oblivion scored lower because it's basically the same game we all played last year with some graphical enhancements.

Avatar image for MC2K8
MC2K8

319

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 MC2K8
Member since 2007 • 319 Posts

It's too early.  How dare you.  The PS3 obviously has the most potential.

 

Avatar image for donalbane
donalbane

16383

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#45 donalbane
Member since 2003 • 16383 Posts
Considering that the Xbox platform launched with it's best game (Halo), and the fact that Microsoft continually got it's butt handed to them from 2001 up until the launch of the Xbox 360, the expectations and scoring standards for that platform may be a bit lower than the Playstation format. TekkenMaster606
You're in fantasy land. The 360 versions are superiror and it's not because people expect less from the 360, it's because people expected more from the PS3. Call of Duty 3 360, for example had double the framerate of it's PS3 counterpart, both online and off. Sounds like the Cell processer and it's ability to float verts doesn't matter as much as general processing power at the end of the day. I love Tekken too, btw. That's one of the main reasons I got my PS3. Even if it comes out on the 360, I'll most likely get the PS3 version without rumble, achievements, and custom soundtracks just because the 360's D-Pad kind of sucks. See, I can admit it when the 360 has shortcomings. Can you admit that the PS3 has them?
Avatar image for SambaLele
SambaLele

5552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 SambaLele
Member since 2004 • 5552 Posts

no, it's not safe. In the beginning multiplats had better gfx on the 360 (in some cases, arguably, like FNR3). Now the case isn't the same anymore. Multiplats are starting to look better on the PS3 like Virtual Tennis and Oblivion. We can't know for sure wich system is better based on multiplats.

It's on the exclusives we'll see the difference. 

Avatar image for Mystery_Writer
Mystery_Writer

8351

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#47 Mystery_Writer
Member since 2004 • 8351 Posts
[QUOTE="Mystery_Writer"][QUOTE="TekkenMaster606"][QUOTE="The_Game21x"]

[QUOTE="TekkenMaster606"]Considering that the Xbox platform launched with it's best game (Halo), and the fact that Microsoft continually got it's butt handed to them from 2001 up until the launch of the Xbox 360, the expectations and scoring standards for that platform may be a bit lower than the Playstation format. TekkenMaster606

And what exactly does that have to do with the differences in power between the Xbox 360 and PS3? :?

Nothing, but is has everything to do with scoring standards. Gamespot, and other websites more than likely compare their experiences from Sony or Microsofts previous consoles when gauging their personal enjoyments and satisfaction out of the current generation. When they fired up Perfect Dark Zero, what else did you have to compare to? Nothing really, except maybe some of the previous games you enjoyed on the previous version of the Xbox. When it comes to the Playstation 3, well, a lot of media outlets may still be expecting Sony to deliver on those E3 2005 targets and promises.

Just something to think about the next time someone claims that because a multiplatform on the Xbox 360 outscored it's Playstation 3 counterpart by a couple tenths of a point.

so you mean, for instance, GS didn't score Virtua Tennis lower because the lack of online compared to X360?

I'm sure it did, but don't you think that if the standards are the same, the lack of online would drive that score farther down?

I c, so you’re saying GS staff have now tougher standards for X360 games since they got used to having online on all X360 games.

I.e., PS3’s version of virtua tennis (that lacks online) would have score much less if it was judged by X360 standards.

You know, that confuse me, cause I thought you were defending the PS3. Anyway, it’s interesting theory, but I don't know, it sound somewhat far fetched.
Avatar image for donalbane
donalbane

16383

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#48 donalbane
Member since 2003 • 16383 Posts

no, it's not safe. In the beginning multiplats had better gfx on the 360 (in some cases, arguably, like FNR3). Now the case isn't the same anymore. Multiplats are starting to look better on the PS3 like Virtual Tennis and Oblivion. We can't know for sure wich system is better based on multiplats.

It's on the exclusives we'll see the difference. 

SambaLele
Oblivion wouldn't have even run if they hadn't decided to install 4.6 gigs on the HD. If the 360 had gone with a large install, the 360 version would load faster (faster even than the PS3... it's got more ram) and look better than the PS3 version. So how many huge installs can the 60 gig HD on the PS3 hold? In short: not as many as you'd like.
Avatar image for asmallchild
asmallchild

2015

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 asmallchild
Member since 2007 • 2015 Posts

do you think it earned that title by now? I mean, on the account that almost all the multiplats are scoring better on X360?

Or multiplat comparison isn't the deciding factor on which console is more powerful?

Mystery_Writer
If you think declaring a winner is safe after the competition has had less than a year, then yes. I'm pretty sure the logical answer is no.
Avatar image for Private_Vegas
Private_Vegas

2783

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 Private_Vegas
Member since 2007 • 2783 Posts

*heavy sigh* No...... just no ok. Stop....stop.

I'm just gonna straddle the fence, play it safe and just say that PS3 is easily equal to the 360 in power. Whether or not it's more powerful I will not say(mainly becasue I think it is too early to say), but the 360 isn't all powerful, king of the hill, lord of all consoles.Â