do you think it earned that title by now? I mean, on the account that almost all the multiplats are scoring better on X360?
Or multiplat comparison isn't the deciding factor on which console is more powerful?
This topic is locked from further discussion.
do you think it earned that title by now? I mean, on the account that almost all the multiplats are scoring better on X360?
Or multiplat comparison isn't the deciding factor on which console is more powerful?
do you think it earned that title by now? I mean, on the account that almost all the multiplats are scoring better on X360?
Or multiplat comparision isn't the deciding factor on which console is more powerful?
Mystery_Writer
Â
most powerful? how do you figure?
No. PS3 is obviously more powerful. Oblivion is one example. Wait until MGS, FFXIII or Gran Turismo.do you think it earned that title by now? I mean, on the account that almost all the multiplats are scoring better on X360?
Or multiplat comparision isn't the deciding factor on which console is more powerful?
Mystery_Writer
[QUOTE="Mystery_Writer"]do you think it earned that title by now? I mean, on the account that almost all the multiplats are scoring better on X360?
Or multiplat comparision isn't the deciding factor on which console is more powerful?
organic_machine
most powerful? how do you figure?
on the account that X360 > PS3 when it comes to multiplats?[QUOTE="Mystery_Writer"]No. PS3 is obviously more powerful. Oblivion is one example. Wait until MGS, FFXIII or Gran Turismo. but didn't the developers worked tirelessly for 1 year just to make it look as good as the X360 version?do you think it earned that title by now? I mean, on the account that almost all the multiplats are scoring better on X360?
Or multiplat comparision isn't the deciding factor on which console is more powerful?
subject117
Considering that the Xbox platform launched with it's best game (Halo), and the fact that Microsoft continually got it's butt handed to them from 2001 up until the launch of the Xbox 360, the expectations and scoring standards for that platform may be a bit lower than the Playstation format. TekkenMaster606
And what exactly does that have to do with the differences in power between the Xbox 360 and PS3? :?
[QUOTE="organic_machine"][QUOTE="Mystery_Writer"]do you think it earned that title by now? I mean, on the account that almost all the multiplats are scoring better on X360?
Or multiplat comparision isn't the deciding factor on which console is more powerful?
Mystery_Writer
most powerful? how do you figure?
on the account that X360 > PS3 when it comes to multiplats? That's no way to prove which is better. In reality, the 360 has a slightly better GPU, but the PS3's CPU is far superior. (Hope that means something to you, because it's all greek to me :?)easily the most powerful.
the ps3's "power" is on paper using benchmarks never achieved in realworld applications... but it does make for some spiffy sounding hype with "TEH CELL"...
it has almost the same ring as "TEH EMOTION ENGINE"...:lol:
[QUOTE="organic_machine"][QUOTE="Mystery_Writer"]do you think it earned that title by now? I mean, on the account that almost all the multiplats are scoring better on X360?
Or multiplat comparision isn't the deciding factor on which console is more powerful?
Mystery_Writer
most powerful? how do you figure?
on the account that X360 > PS3 when it comes to multiplats? That's not so true lately, with Virtua Tennis and Oblivion.Considering that the Xbox platform launched with it's best game (Halo), and the fact that Microsoft continually got it's butt handed to them from 2001 up until the launch of the Xbox 360, the expectations and scoring standards for that platform may be a bit lower than the Playstation format. TekkenMaster606
Â
sorry man but thats DC
Â
Â
[QUOTE="Mystery_Writer"][QUOTE="organic_machine"][QUOTE="Mystery_Writer"]do you think it earned that title by now? I mean, on the account that almost all the multiplats are scoring better on X360?
Or multiplat comparision isn't the deciding factor on which console is more powerful?
Ibacai
most powerful? how do you figure?
on the account that X360 > PS3 when it comes to multiplats? That's not so true lately, with Virtua Tennis and Oblivion. And NCAA Hoops 2k7[QUOTE="Mystery_Writer"][QUOTE="organic_machine"][QUOTE="Mystery_Writer"]do you think it earned that title by now? I mean, on the account that almost all the multiplats are scoring better on X360?
Or multiplat comparision isn't the deciding factor on which console is more powerful?
Ibacai
Â
most powerful? how do you figure?
on the account that X360 > PS3 when it comes to multiplats? That's not so true lately, with Virtua Tennis and Oblivion.???
Â
Virtua Tennis and Oblivion both scored higher on the X360.Â
[QUOTE="organic_machine"][QUOTE="Mystery_Writer"]do you think it earned that title by now? I mean, on the account that almost all the multiplats are scoring better on X360?
Or multiplat comparision isn't the deciding factor on which console is more powerful?
Mystery_Writer
most powerful? how do you figure?
on the account that X360 > PS3 when it comes to multiplats? Gears of War was the big game that took the 360 over the top. That came out pretty much a year after the 360 released. A month before GeOW released, the 360 was a bit of a laughing stock. You can't judge the PS3 yet when at this time it was in the same situation the 360 was in.[QUOTE="Ibacai"][QUOTE="Mystery_Writer"][QUOTE="organic_machine"][QUOTE="Mystery_Writer"]do you think it earned that title by now? I mean, on the account that almost all the multiplats are scoring better on X360?
Or multiplat comparision isn't the deciding factor on which console is more powerful?
joeblak
most powerful? how do you figure?
on the account that X360 > PS3 when it comes to multiplats? That's not so true lately, with Virtua Tennis and Oblivion.???
Virtua Tennis and Oblivion both scored higher on the X360.
Virtua Tennis did due to online play, and Oblivion because it was released a year earlier. I do prefer Oblivion on the 360 however. Can't really say why, maybe it's just because I played it on it first.Considering that the Xbox platform launched with it's best game (Halo), and the fact that Microsoft continually got it's butt handed to them from 2001 up until the launch of the Xbox 360, the expectations and scoring standards for that platform may be a bit lower than the Playstation format. TekkenMaster606so, for instance, multiplat games lacking online on the PS3 version has nothing to do with them getting lower score on that platform?
[QUOTE="organic_machine"][QUOTE="Mystery_Writer"]do you think it earned that title by now? I mean, on the account that almost all the multiplats are scoring better on X360?
Or multiplat comparision isn't the deciding factor on which console is more powerful?
Mystery_Writer
Â
most powerful? how do you figure?
on the account that X360 > PS3 when it comes to multiplats?That is the fault of the developer and not the system. Frankly, I think that Sony AND Microsoft both did horrible jobs when designing their consoles. I am surpised at sony because PS1 and PS2 were great machines for their day. Microsoft has been making crappy hardware since the late 80's
[QUOTE="Mystery_Writer"]No. PS3 is obviously more powerful. Oblivion is one example. Wait until MGS, FFXIII or Gran Turismo. Oblivion is a poor choice because with another year it would look good on the Wii. But the 360 has a better GPU, but the PS3 has a way better CPU which makes the PS3 stronger. Though it seems like the 360 is alot easier to develope for so it evens out.do you think it earned that title by now? I mean, on the account that almost all the multiplats are scoring better on X360?
Or multiplat comparision isn't the deciding factor on which console is more powerful?
subject117
[QUOTE="joeblak"][QUOTE="Ibacai"][QUOTE="Mystery_Writer"][QUOTE="organic_machine"][QUOTE="Mystery_Writer"]do you think it earned that title by now? I mean, on the account that almost all the multiplats are scoring better on X360?
Or multiplat comparision isn't the deciding factor on which console is more powerful?
ramey70
Â
most powerful? how do you figure?
on the account that X360 > PS3 when it comes to multiplats? That's not so true lately, with Virtua Tennis and Oblivion.???
Â
Virtua Tennis and Oblivion both scored higher on the X360.
Virtua Tennis did due to online play, and Oblivion because it was released a year earlier. I do prefer Oblivion on the 360 however. Can't really say why, maybe it's just because I played it on it first. That will be a common occurrence this generation.
[QUOTE="subject117"][QUOTE="Mystery_Writer"]No. PS3 is obviously more powerful. Oblivion is one example. Wait until MGS, FFXIII or Gran Turismo. Oblivion is a poor choice because with another year it would look good on the Wii. But the 360 has a better GPU, but the PS3 has a way better CPU which makes the PS3 stronger. Though it seems like the 360 is alot easier to develope for so it evens out. And there you have hit the nail on the head (Posted this before). The PS3 has a higher peak performance but it's much harder to reach then the 360's. So it's not cost efficient to really push the hardware on a multiplat just yet.do you think it earned that title by now? I mean, on the account that almost all the multiplats are scoring better on X360?
Or multiplat comparision isn't the deciding factor on which console is more powerful?
wooooode
Considering that the Xbox platform launched with it's best game (Halo), and the fact that Microsoft continually got it's butt handed to them from 2001 up until the launch of the Xbox 360, the expectations and scoring standards for that platform may be a bit lower than the Playstation format. TekkenMaster606
[QUOTE="Mystery_Writer"][QUOTE="organic_machine"][QUOTE="Mystery_Writer"]do you think it earned that title by now? I mean, on the account that almost all the multiplats are scoring better on X360?
Or multiplat comparision isn't the deciding factor on which console is more powerful?
Tylendal
Â
most powerful? how do you figure?
on the account that X360 > PS3 when it comes to multiplats? That's no way to prove which is better. In reality, the 360 has a slightly better GPU, but the PS3's CPU is far superior. (Hope that means something to you, because it's all greek to me :?)This is true, however, having a far supperior CPU doesn't really mean much when that CPU only has access to 256 MBs of RAM.
[QUOTE="TekkenMaster606"]Considering that the Xbox platform launched with it's best game (Halo), and the fact that Microsoft continually got it's butt handed to them from 2001 up until the launch of the Xbox 360, the expectations and scoring standards for that platform may be a bit lower than the Playstation format. The_Game21x
And what exactly does that have to do with the differences in power between the Xbox 360 and PS3? :?
Â
Nothing, but is has everything to do with scoring standards. Gamespot, and other websites more than likely compare their experiences from Sony or Microsofts previous consoles when gauging their personal enjoyments and satisfaction out of the current generation. When they fired up Perfect Dark Zero, what else did you have to compare to? Nothing really, except maybe some of the previous games you enjoyed on the previous version of the Xbox. When it comes to the Playstation 3, well, a lot of media outlets may still be expecting Sony to deliver on those E3 2005 targets and promises.Â
Â
Just something to think about the next time someone claims that because a multiplatform on the Xbox 360 outscored it's Playstation 3 counterpart by a couple tenths of a point. Â
ps3 7 cores are 3.2ghz 360 3 core 3.2ghz 7x3.2= 22.4 3x3.2=9.6deadmeat59
Boy are you massively misinformed.
SPE's are not cores. They are specialized processors made for processing highyl complex math quickly. The PS3 has one 3.2 Ghz core and 7 SPE's. The 360 has 3 cores clocked at 3.2 Ghz.
[QUOTE="Mystery_Writer"]No. PS3 is obviously more powerful. Oblivion is one example. Wait until MGS, FFXIII or Gran Turismo. Wait, wait and wait.. That's the only thing we hear from Sony fanboys.do you think it earned that title by now? I mean, on the account that almost all the multiplats are scoring better on X360?
Or multiplat comparision isn't the deciding factor on which console is more powerful?
subject117
the PS3 and Xbox 360 will be so close to each other in graphics it won't be worth fighting over.
It will all come down to games and price, which at this point and time (and future IMO) the Xbox 360Â already has it beat.
Graphics havne't decided the winners of the last two gens, so why would it now?
[QUOTE="The_Game21x"][QUOTE="TekkenMaster606"]Considering that the Xbox platform launched with it's best game (Halo), and the fact that Microsoft continually got it's butt handed to them from 2001 up until the launch of the Xbox 360, the expectations and scoring standards for that platform may be a bit lower than the Playstation format. TekkenMaster606
And what exactly does that have to do with the differences in power between the Xbox 360 and PS3? :?
Â
Nothing, but is has everything to do with scoring standards. Gamespot, and other websites more than likely compare their experiences from Sony or Microsofts previous consoles when gauging their personal enjoyments and satisfaction out of the current generation. When they fired up Perfect Dark Zero, what else did you have to compare to? Nothing really, except maybe some of the previous games you enjoyed on the previous version of the Xbox. When it comes to the Playstation 3, well, a lot of media outlets may still be expecting Sony to deliver on those E3 2005 targets and promises.Â
Â
Just something to think about the next time someone claims that because a multiplatform on the Xbox 360 outscored it's Playstation 3 counterpart by a couple tenths of a point. Â
Umm...as nicely worded as that was, it still has absolutely nothing to do with the topic at hand...
No... the PS3 looks more powerful atm. Look at the PS3 version of Oblivion; it looks considerably better.MetrovaniaI wonder if there are other mulitplats out there we can compare. Do you know, by any chance, if such other multiplats exist? You know, like some other ones to compare without the one year advantage?
[QUOTE="Mystery_Writer"][QUOTE="organic_machine"][QUOTE="Mystery_Writer"]do you think it earned that title by now? I mean, on the account that almost all the multiplats are scoring better on X360?
Or multiplat comparision isn't the deciding factor on which console is more powerful?
OhhSnap50893
Â
most powerful? how do you figure?
on the account that X360 > PS3 when it comes to multiplats? Gears of War was the big game that took the 360 over the top. That came out pretty much a year after the 360 released. A month before GeOW released, the 360 was a bit of a laughing stock. You can't judge the PS3 yet when at this time it was in the same situation the 360 was in.man you have a bad memory
OB and GRAW both out before GeoW and both AAA
you are right cow's still made fun of the system and now you know
why they are hearing it now
can't take it dont dish it
Â
Â
[QUOTE="TekkenMaster606"][QUOTE="The_Game21x"][QUOTE="TekkenMaster606"]Considering that the Xbox platform launched with it's best game (Halo), and the fact that Microsoft continually got it's butt handed to them from 2001 up until the launch of the Xbox 360, the expectations and scoring standards for that platform may be a bit lower than the Playstation format. The_Game21x
And what exactly does that have to do with the differences in power between the Xbox 360 and PS3? :?
Â
Nothing, but is has everything to do with scoring standards. Gamespot, and other websites more than likely compare their experiences from Sony or Microsofts previous consoles when gauging their personal enjoyments and satisfaction out of the current generation. When they fired up Perfect Dark Zero, what else did you have to compare to? Nothing really, except maybe some of the previous games you enjoyed on the previous version of the Xbox. When it comes to the Playstation 3, well, a lot of media outlets may still be expecting Sony to deliver on those E3 2005 targets and promises.
Â
Just something to think about the next time someone claims that because a multiplatform on the Xbox 360 outscored it's Playstation 3 counterpart by a couple tenths of a point.
Umm...as nicely worded as that was, it still has absolutely nothing to do with the topic at hand...
Â
The second sentence in the original post mentions better multiplatforms on the Xbox 360. Figured I would point out that the standards are completely different. Â
[QUOTE="The_Game21x"][QUOTE="TekkenMaster606"]Considering that the Xbox platform launched with it's best game (Halo), and the fact that Microsoft continually got it's butt handed to them from 2001 up until the launch of the Xbox 360, the expectations and scoring standards for that platform may be a bit lower than the Playstation format. TekkenMaster606
And what exactly does that have to do with the differences in power between the Xbox 360 and PS3? :?
Nothing, but is has everything to do with scoring standards. Gamespot, and other websites more than likely compare their experiences from Sony or Microsofts previous consoles when gauging their personal enjoyments and satisfaction out of the current generation. When they fired up Perfect Dark Zero, what else did you have to compare to? Nothing really, except maybe some of the previous games you enjoyed on the previous version of the Xbox. When it comes to the Playstation 3, well, a lot of media outlets may still be expecting Sony to deliver on those E3 2005 targets and promises.
Just something to think about the next time someone claims that because a multiplatform on the Xbox 360 outscored it's Playstation 3 counterpart by a couple tenths of a point.
so you mean, for instance, GS didn't score Virtua Tennis lower because the lack of online compared to X360?[QUOTE="TekkenMaster606"][QUOTE="The_Game21x"][QUOTE="TekkenMaster606"]Considering that the Xbox platform launched with it's best game (Halo), and the fact that Microsoft continually got it's butt handed to them from 2001 up until the launch of the Xbox 360, the expectations and scoring standards for that platform may be a bit lower than the Playstation format. Mystery_Writer
And what exactly does that have to do with the differences in power between the Xbox 360 and PS3? :?
Â
Nothing, but is has everything to do with scoring standards. Gamespot, and other websites more than likely compare their experiences from Sony or Microsofts previous consoles when gauging their personal enjoyments and satisfaction out of the current generation. When they fired up Perfect Dark Zero, what else did you have to compare to? Nothing really, except maybe some of the previous games you enjoyed on the previous version of the Xbox. When it comes to the Playstation 3, well, a lot of media outlets may still be expecting Sony to deliver on those E3 2005 targets and promises.
Â
Just something to think about the next time someone claims that because a multiplatform on the Xbox 360 outscored it's Playstation 3 counterpart by a couple tenths of a point.
so you mean, for instance, GS didn't score Virtua Tennis lower because the lack of online compared to X360?Â
I'm sure it did, but don't you think that if the standards are the same, the lack of online would drive that score farther down? Lack of online and it only scored .2 of a point less.Â
[QUOTE="The_Game21x"][QUOTE="TekkenMaster606"][QUOTE="The_Game21x"][QUOTE="TekkenMaster606"]Considering that the Xbox platform launched with it's best game (Halo), and the fact that Microsoft continually got it's butt handed to them from 2001 up until the launch of the Xbox 360, the expectations and scoring standards for that platform may be a bit lower than the Playstation format. TekkenMaster606
And what exactly does that have to do with the differences in power between the Xbox 360 and PS3? :?
Â
Nothing, but is has everything to do with scoring standards. Gamespot, and other websites more than likely compare their experiences from Sony or Microsofts previous consoles when gauging their personal enjoyments and satisfaction out of the current generation. When they fired up Perfect Dark Zero, what else did you have to compare to? Nothing really, except maybe some of the previous games you enjoyed on the previous version of the Xbox. When it comes to the Playstation 3, well, a lot of media outlets may still be expecting Sony to deliver on those E3 2005 targets and promises.
Â
Just something to think about the next time someone claims that because a multiplatform on the Xbox 360 outscored it's Playstation 3 counterpart by a couple tenths of a point.
Umm...as nicely worded as that was, it still has absolutely nothing to do with the topic at hand...
Â
The second sentence in the original post mentions better multiplatforms on the Xbox 360. Figured I would point out that the standards are completely different. Â
Link??
 no link no proof
Â
Â
Â
do you think it earned that title by now? I mean, on the account that almost all the multiplats are scoring better on X360?
Or multiplat comparison isn't the deciding factor on which console is more powerful?
Mystery_Writer
sounds to me like you're just a fanboy, but in my opinion you can't really tell yet some multiplat games do look better on the 360 but others don't and oblivion is not just as good as the 360's, it's better, just like the devs had a year to learn how to do games on the 360 they have to learn how to use the ps3's power, but there both great systems so whoever wins i win because i just wanna play good games it doesn't matter what console it's on.
[QUOTE="The_Game21x"][QUOTE="TekkenMaster606"][QUOTE="The_Game21x"][QUOTE="TekkenMaster606"]Considering that the Xbox platform launched with it's best game (Halo), and the fact that Microsoft continually got it's butt handed to them from 2001 up until the launch of the Xbox 360, the expectations and scoring standards for that platform may be a bit lower than the Playstation format. TekkenMaster606
And what exactly does that have to do with the differences in power between the Xbox 360 and PS3? :?
Â
Nothing, but is has everything to do with scoring standards. Gamespot, and other websites more than likely compare their experiences from Sony or Microsofts previous consoles when gauging their personal enjoyments and satisfaction out of the current generation. When they fired up Perfect Dark Zero, what else did you have to compare to? Nothing really, except maybe some of the previous games you enjoyed on the previous version of the Xbox. When it comes to the Playstation 3, well, a lot of media outlets may still be expecting Sony to deliver on those E3 2005 targets and promises.
Â
Just something to think about the next time someone claims that because a multiplatform on the Xbox 360 outscored it's Playstation 3 counterpart by a couple tenths of a point.
Umm...as nicely worded as that was, it still has absolutely nothing to do with the topic at hand...
Â
The second sentence in the original post mentions better multiplatforms on the Xbox 360. Figured I would point out that the standards are completely different. Â
Standards are completely different between the Xbox 360 and PS3? I don't think so. There are reasons why multiplats on the Xbox 360 outscored the same multiplats on the PS3, and no, the "standards" are not among those reasons. Virtua Tennis scored lower because there's no online play. Oblivion scored lower because it's basically the same game we all played last year with some graphical enhancements.
Considering that the Xbox platform launched with it's best game (Halo), and the fact that Microsoft continually got it's butt handed to them from 2001 up until the launch of the Xbox 360, the expectations and scoring standards for that platform may be a bit lower than the Playstation format. TekkenMaster606You're in fantasy land. The 360 versions are superiror and it's not because people expect less from the 360, it's because people expected more from the PS3. Call of Duty 3 360, for example had double the framerate of it's PS3 counterpart, both online and off. Sounds like the Cell processer and it's ability to float verts doesn't matter as much as general processing power at the end of the day. I love Tekken too, btw. That's one of the main reasons I got my PS3. Even if it comes out on the 360, I'll most likely get the PS3 version without rumble, achievements, and custom soundtracks just because the 360's D-Pad kind of sucks. See, I can admit it when the 360 has shortcomings. Can you admit that the PS3 has them?
no, it's not safe. In the beginning multiplats had better gfx on the 360 (in some cases, arguably, like FNR3). Now the case isn't the same anymore. Multiplats are starting to look better on the PS3 like Virtual Tennis and Oblivion. We can't know for sure wich system is better based on multiplats.
It's on the exclusives we'll see the difference.Â
[QUOTE="Mystery_Writer"][QUOTE="TekkenMaster606"][QUOTE="The_Game21x"][QUOTE="TekkenMaster606"]Considering that the Xbox platform launched with it's best game (Halo), and the fact that Microsoft continually got it's butt handed to them from 2001 up until the launch of the Xbox 360, the expectations and scoring standards for that platform may be a bit lower than the Playstation format. TekkenMaster606
And what exactly does that have to do with the differences in power between the Xbox 360 and PS3? :?
Nothing, but is has everything to do with scoring standards. Gamespot, and other websites more than likely compare their experiences from Sony or Microsofts previous consoles when gauging their personal enjoyments and satisfaction out of the current generation. When they fired up Perfect Dark Zero, what else did you have to compare to? Nothing really, except maybe some of the previous games you enjoyed on the previous version of the Xbox. When it comes to the Playstation 3, well, a lot of media outlets may still be expecting Sony to deliver on those E3 2005 targets and promises.
Just something to think about the next time someone claims that because a multiplatform on the Xbox 360 outscored it's Playstation 3 counterpart by a couple tenths of a point.
so you mean, for instance, GS didn't score Virtua Tennis lower because the lack of online compared to X360?I'm sure it did, but don't you think that if the standards are the same, the lack of online would drive that score farther down?
I c, so you’re saying GS staff have now tougher standards for X360 games since they got used to having online on all X360 games.Oblivion wouldn't have even run if they hadn't decided to install 4.6 gigs on the HD. If the 360 had gone with a large install, the 360 version would load faster (faster even than the PS3... it's got more ram) and look better than the PS3 version. So how many huge installs can the 60 gig HD on the PS3 hold? In short: not as many as you'd like.no, it's not safe. In the beginning multiplats had better gfx on the 360 (in some cases, arguably, like FNR3). Now the case isn't the same anymore. Multiplats are starting to look better on the PS3 like Virtual Tennis and Oblivion. We can't know for sure wich system is better based on multiplats.
It's on the exclusives we'll see the difference.Â
SambaLele
If you think declaring a winner is safe after the competition has had less than a year, then yes. I'm pretty sure the logical answer is no.do you think it earned that title by now? I mean, on the account that almost all the multiplats are scoring better on X360?
Or multiplat comparison isn't the deciding factor on which console is more powerful?
Mystery_Writer
*heavy sigh* No...... just no ok. Stop....stop.
I'm just gonna straddle the fence, play it safe and just say that PS3 is easily equal to the 360 in power. Whether or not it's more powerful I will not say(mainly becasue I think it is too early to say), but the 360 isn't all powerful, king of the hill, lord of all consoles.Â
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment