Is Nintendo's bubble popping? They may be in big trouble.

  • 126 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for sailor232
sailor232

6880

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#51 sailor232
Member since 2003 • 6880 Posts

I never said all of Nintendos games were worthless of my time or work wasnt put into them. In fact I consider Metroid prime series to be under Retro anyway, same with DKC:R, both fantastic by the way. I just think the majority of there games this gen seem slapped together on a low budget and sold full price. I do consider NSMB a port, I bet you they could get that running on the ds with mulitplayer support with multi carts, there's a reason it looks terrible on a big hd screen.

Anyway I dont think Nintendo's in trouble anyway, the've gone after a different audience and its worked for them, they could afford to do half this well next gen and still come out in the blue.

Avatar image for nintendoboy16
nintendoboy16

42220

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 44

User Lists: 14

#52 nintendoboy16
Member since 2007 • 42220 Posts

I never said all of Nintendos games were worthless of my time or work wasnt put into them. In fact I consider Metroid prime series to be under Retro anyway, same with DKC:R, both fantastic by the way. I just think the majority of there games this gen seem slapped together on a low budget and sold full price. I do consider NSMB a port, I bet you they could get that running on the ds with mulitplayer support with multi carts, there's a reason it looks terrible on a big hd screen.

Anyway I dont think Nintendo's in trouble anyway, the've gone after a different audience and its worked for them, they could afford to do half this well next gen and still come out in the blue.

sailor232

Retro Studios is completely owned by Nintendo, so they technically count as Nintendo. Much like Sonic Team is to Sega and how Rare is to Microsoft. And of course Wii games look bad on an HDTV, it's a standard definition console, not even the upscaler helps it out.

Avatar image for deactivated-57ad0e5285d73
deactivated-57ad0e5285d73

21398

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 deactivated-57ad0e5285d73
Member since 2009 • 21398 Posts

[QUOTE="sailor232"]

I never said all of Nintendos games were worthless of my time or work wasnt put into them. In fact I consider Metroid prime series to be under Retro anyway, same with DKC:R, both fantastic by the way. I just think the majority of there games this gen seem slapped together on a low budget and sold full price. I do consider NSMB a port, I bet you they could get that running on the ds with mulitplayer support with multi carts, there's a reason it looks terrible on a big hd screen.

Anyway I dont think Nintendo's in trouble anyway, the've gone after a different audience and its worked for them, they could afford to do half this well next gen and still come out in the blue.

nintendoboy16

Retro Studios is completely owned by Nintendo, so they technically count as Nintendo. Much like Sonic Team is to Sega and how Rare is to Microsoft. And of course Wii games look bad on an HDTV, it's a standard definition console, not even the upscaler helps it out.

Yeah I tend to disagree. That all depends on the tv.

Avatar image for coasterguy65
coasterguy65

7133

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#54 coasterguy65
Member since 2005 • 7133 Posts

3DS is finally priced at a fair price. It will sell like crazy after Aug. 12th, and especially around the holidays. Nintendo will be fine.

Avatar image for nintendoboy16
nintendoboy16

42220

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 44

User Lists: 14

#55 nintendoboy16
Member since 2007 • 42220 Posts

[QUOTE="nintendoboy16"]

[QUOTE="Timstuff"]No matter what Nintendo is going to be criticized. They can't simply be expected to roll over and die if they can't make game consoles anymore, and I think they would be very competitive even as a third party developer. You might quit buying Nintendo's games if they went third party out of pride, but many people who grew up playing Nintendo games but left their systems would start buying their games again so it's kind of a moot effect.DJ-Lafleur

Not everyone who grew up with Nintendo buys their products and like I said, the fact that Nintendo gets bashed by the gaming community (Sonic level) makes it better that Nintendo is better off not being in gaming anymore.

I'm pretty sure Sonic gets far more hate than Nintendo ever does.

I mean, if there was a "do you like Sonic thread" anywhere, there would be many people who would say how crappy Sonic has gotten, with very few people defending it.

Have a "do you like Nintendo thread", I'm sure around half the people in it would be okay with them atleast, depending on the forum, I suppose.

They both have one thing in common to be compared, a "damned if they do, damned if they don't" scenario.
Avatar image for Demonjoe93
Demonjoe93

9869

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 107

User Lists: 0

#56 Demonjoe93
Member since 2009 • 9869 Posts

Another thread about how much trouble Nintendo is in huh? They're gonna be fine.

Avatar image for Blake135
Blake135

3994

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 Blake135
Member since 2008 • 3994 Posts
3DS"s price was a joke and wasnt worth the price no matter what people said, and Nintendo deserves what it's currently getting. No games, high price ? They were riding on the DS" success and thought it would sell like hotcakes. Now their finally cutting into their profits? I have no sympathy for them Sony undercuts themselves to provide a price for the consumer while they get a profits hit, Nintendo overcharged for all their stuff and hate slicing any profits off. They won't "die out" that's silly... I believe 3DS will pick up alot near Christmas with the new price and games finally coming out, WiiU ? I'm not sure how well it will sell. Casual families will probably eat it up like the Wii but I'm not sure if hardcore gamers will touch it. Plus most believe the next xbox or playstaion in the works and would rather save their hard earned cash for those consoles rather then what some might see as, Wii HD.
Avatar image for XanderZane
XanderZane

5174

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#58 XanderZane
Member since 2006 • 5174 Posts

their fine, 3ds will pick up with the sales. everyone seems to think nintendo is going to end up like sega nowadays.

lostfan132
Agreed. Nintendo isn't going anywhere. Their sales were down last year too and they still outsold the PS3, 360 and PSP in sales during the holiday season. I'm not worried about Nintendo at all. They always bounce back with something great and innovative. We'll see how the Wii U does next year. I'm not going to rush out and get it.
Avatar image for zekere
zekere

2536

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#59 zekere
Member since 2003 • 2536 Posts

I foresaw this back in 2006 when they released their Wii. They've lost their hardcore audience (including me) and they won't return anymore.

Avatar image for deactivated-57ad0e5285d73
deactivated-57ad0e5285d73

21398

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 deactivated-57ad0e5285d73
Member since 2009 • 21398 Posts

[QUOTE="lostfan132"]

their fine, 3ds will pick up with the sales. everyone seems to think nintendo is going to end up like sega nowadays.

XanderZane

Agreed. Nintendo isn't going anywhere. Their sales were down last year too and they still outsold the PS3, 360 and PSP in sales during the holiday season. I'm not worried about Nintendo at all. They always bounce back with something great and innovative. We'll see how the Wii U does next year. I'm not going to rush out and get it.

I'm not taking sides, but Eurogamer put up an interesting article. With the success of the Wii, how exactly is all this happening?

Avatar image for Shinobishyguy
Shinobishyguy

22928

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#61 Shinobishyguy
Member since 2006 • 22928 Posts

You know, it almost seems like this excites you.

hakanakumono
thats most likely the case given his history
Avatar image for DarkGamer007
DarkGamer007

6033

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 DarkGamer007
Member since 2008 • 6033 Posts

Cripes, how many "Nintendo is doomed" threads are we going to have? They'll be fine, it's a small misfire.

nintendoboy16

Shhh. This is the cynical gaming era, where everything is cynical and everything that does not do as excepted no mater in what time frame is doomed to something or another and every game needs to be dark, gritty and depressing. Nintendo is fine, smartphones will not kill handheld gaming devices and Sony's Vita will be successful as well.

Avatar image for RR360DD
RR360DD

14099

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#63 RR360DD
Member since 2011 • 14099 Posts
Im glad, because I dont like the direction Nintendo has been heading in since the Wii launch.
Avatar image for haziqonfire
haziqonfire

36392

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#64 haziqonfire
Member since 2005 • 36392 Posts

Im glad, because I dont like the direction Nintendo has been heading in since the Wii launch.RR360DD

You're glad because a gaming company is suffering? Why would anyone be glad that any of the console manufacturer's are suffering?

The entire industry, not just Nintendo, has been in sort of a weird spot lately. Everything has been so stagnant and the market has changed since 2004 (Nintendo even made a point of saying "development costs are too high and the payoff might not be worth it anymore"). That's why you see so many developers flock to the iOS because it's cheaper and they can make more money off of it. That's also why you saw the Wii as what it was. Iwata stated at GDC too that they didn't want to add to the rising development costs and there's a good reason why. No one is willing to take a risk anymore with big budget titles because if it doesn't work then you're out - Pandemic, Free Radical, Factor5 - the list goes on.

All three of the manufacturer's need to put more emphasis on their downloadable shops and put more games there - It's a more flexible market for pricing their content and the scale of their content and it's something that can compete with the iOS market, while allowing the manufacturer's to produce premium content. People are still going to pay $39.99 for a Mario title, a Pokemon title, a Zelda title etc - but there needs to be a bigger emphasis on the eShop and downloadable games. In 2004 we saw games like Brainage being sold in retail - the difference now is those gams are available on the iOS and others for a cheaper price.

So all in all I don't think Nintendo's bubble is popping ... I think this is a result of the market situation being very different than it was in 2004. Frankly, I'm thinking the PS Vita will be in a similar situation, as will all the other consoles that come out next generation, including the Wii U.

Avatar image for blacktorn
blacktorn

8299

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#65 blacktorn
Member since 2004 • 8299 Posts
If you look at there past success and sony's,they tend to have a great successful console followed up by a not so successful console (snes vs n64,ps2 vs ps3),even if it comes second to the Psvita it can still rack in money for nintendo,just not as much as they were hoping from the DS
Avatar image for GreySeal9
GreySeal9

28247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 41

User Lists: 0

#66 GreySeal9
Member since 2010 • 28247 Posts

[QUOTE="XanderZane"][QUOTE="lostfan132"]

their fine, 3ds will pick up with the sales. everyone seems to think nintendo is going to end up like sega nowadays.

Heirren

Agreed. Nintendo isn't going anywhere. Their sales were down last year too and they still outsold the PS3, 360 and PSP in sales during the holiday season. I'm not worried about Nintendo at all. They always bounce back with something great and innovative. We'll see how the Wii U does next year. I'm not going to rush out and get it.

I'm not taking sides, but Eurogamer put up an interesting article. With the success of the Wii, how exactly is all this happening?

I'm not trying to discredit the article or anything (though I don't really agree), but he really thinks Animal Crossing is one of the best things Nintendo has done? :? Animal Crossing sucks.

Avatar image for eboyishere
eboyishere

12681

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 eboyishere
Member since 2011 • 12681 Posts
I think a video game industry bubble is around the corner tbh
Avatar image for Rockman999
Rockman999

7507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 Rockman999
Member since 2005 • 7507 Posts

[QUOTE="Timstuff"][QUOTE="hakanakumono"]

You know, it almost seems like this excites you.

hakanakumono

I grew up with Nintendo, why would I want them to go out of business? That's like hoping Disney stops making animation.

It just seems like you've been pretty intense on the anti-nintendo stuff recently.

I wouldn't blame him, the sheep have been very annoying lately. Maybe this is his way of attacking them.
Avatar image for Nonstop-Madness
Nonstop-Madness

12869

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#69 Nonstop-Madness
Member since 2008 • 12869 Posts
the problem with Nintendo is that they are only a 1st party gaming company. Nintendo needs to modernize its game franchises and go 3rd party, maybe not next gen but at some point they will have to.
Avatar image for nintendoboy16
nintendoboy16

42220

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 44

User Lists: 14

#70 nintendoboy16
Member since 2007 • 42220 Posts

the problem with Nintendo is that they are only a 1st party gaming company. Nintendo needs to modernize its game franchises and go 3rd party, maybe not next gen but at some point they will have to. Nonstop-Madness
And how would going third party make their franchises better? If anything, it will make not only their franchises, but Nintendo themselves (and as if their reception isn't bad enough now) worse, so no.

Avatar image for Shenmue_Jehuty
Shenmue_Jehuty

5211

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#71 Shenmue_Jehuty
Member since 2007 • 5211 Posts

bubble popping? I'm not sure what you mean exactly, but in terms of Nintendo not being number one next gen, it is waaayyyy to early to tell.

Avatar image for Nonstop-Madness
Nonstop-Madness

12869

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#72 Nonstop-Madness
Member since 2008 • 12869 Posts
[QUOTE="Nonstop-Madness"]the problem with Nintendo is that they are only a 1st party gaming company. Nintendo needs to modernize its game franchises and go 3rd party, maybe not next gen but at some point they will have to. nintendoboy16
And how would going third party make their franchises better? If anything, it will make not only their franchises, but Nintendo themselves (and as if their reception isn't bad enough now), so no. They are better off leaving gaming and moving on to something else.

it won't make there games better but it will increase sales.
Avatar image for nintendoboy16
nintendoboy16

42220

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 44

User Lists: 14

#73 nintendoboy16
Member since 2007 • 42220 Posts
[QUOTE="nintendoboy16"][QUOTE="Nonstop-Madness"]the problem with Nintendo is that they are only a 1st party gaming company. Nintendo needs to modernize its game franchises and go 3rd party, maybe not next gen but at some point they will have to. Nonstop-Madness
And how would going third party make their franchises better? If anything, it will make not only their franchises, but Nintendo themselves (and as if their reception isn't bad enough now), so no. They are better off leaving gaming and moving on to something else.

it won't make there games better but it will increase sales.

Okay, at first you say "Nintendo needs to go third party to modernize their games" and now you say "they need to go third party to make more money?" Either way, that will NOT work for Nintendo.
Avatar image for Nonstop-Madness
Nonstop-Madness

12869

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#74 Nonstop-Madness
Member since 2008 • 12869 Posts
[QUOTE="Nonstop-Madness"][QUOTE="nintendoboy16"] And how would going third party make their franchises better? If anything, it will make not only their franchises, but Nintendo themselves (and as if their reception isn't bad enough now), so no. They are better off leaving gaming and moving on to something else.nintendoboy16
it won't make there games better but it will increase sales.

Okay, at first you say "Nintendo needs to go third party to modernize their games" and now you say "they need to go third party to make more money?" Either way, that will NOT work for Nintendo.

Modernizing there games AND go third party, two seperate ideas. Going 3rd party will make them more money and modernizing there games will allow them to be more successful on other platforms.
Avatar image for nameless12345
nameless12345

15125

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 nameless12345
Member since 2010 • 15125 Posts

Isn't Sony in bigger trouble? You know, selling consoles under their price's worth, lagging behind in sales and stuff like that.

Avatar image for nintendoboy16
nintendoboy16

42220

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 44

User Lists: 14

#76 nintendoboy16
Member since 2007 • 42220 Posts
[QUOTE="nintendoboy16"][QUOTE="Nonstop-Madness"] it won't make there games better but it will increase sales. Nonstop-Madness
Okay, at first you say "Nintendo needs to go third party to modernize their games" and now you say "they need to go third party to make more money?" Either way, that will NOT work for Nintendo.

Modernizing there games AND go third party, two seperate ideas. Going 3rd party will make them more money and modernizing there games will allow them to be more successful on other platforms.

If they are separate ideas, why did you bring them up as one in your posts?
Avatar image for eboyishere
eboyishere

12681

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#77 eboyishere
Member since 2011 • 12681 Posts

Isn't Sony in bigger trouble? You know, selling consoles under their price's worth, lagging behind in sales and stuff like that.

nameless12345
Sony isn't just a gaming company, they have back ups(even if they are stagnant) Ninth is pure gaming,thats it
Avatar image for nameless12345
nameless12345

15125

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#78 nameless12345
Member since 2010 • 15125 Posts

[QUOTE="nameless12345"]

Isn't Sony in bigger trouble? You know, selling consoles under their price's worth, lagging behind in sales and stuff like that.

eboyishere

Sony isn't just a gaming company, they have back ups(even if they are stagnant) Ninth is pure gaming,thats it

Maybe so but they could still start making toys or something like that if they'd fail in the gaming bussiness (not saying that'll happen).

Avatar image for Timstuff
Timstuff

26840

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#79 Timstuff
Member since 2002 • 26840 Posts

[QUOTE="Timstuff"]

[QUOTE="nintendoboy16"] I buy games if I'm interested in them, simple as that. And sometimes, I don't agree that some games get high scores or awards (Twilight Princess) as well as some hated games I actually like.

nintendoboy16

Do you decide a game did not deserve to get its good reviews before, or after you have played it? Because it seems like if you're going to say "This new Nintendo game for the PS4 and Xbox 720 has lots of good reviews, but I am not going to try it, because it's a bad game and the reviews are all wrong," then that's just being a spiteful fanboy.

And many gamers haven't disagreed with critics, or have little to no interest in some well praised games before?

Weren't you one of those who said Nintendo isn't as good as they were back then?

I do not outright deny that any of Nintendo's games are interest me, and if I had a Wii I'd be playing a lot of them. What you are saying is that you would feel spiteful towards Nintendo if they stopped making game systems, and would boycott their games if they did because you don't want to play them on their competitors systems. You can try and mask it as much as you want, but that's what it boils down to.
Avatar image for Rude_Bwoii
Rude_Bwoii

523

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#80 Rude_Bwoii
Member since 2011 • 523 Posts

Nintendo needs to lose the gimmicks and get back to making new quality games.

Avatar image for KBFloYd
KBFloYd

22714

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#81 KBFloYd
Member since 2009 • 22714 Posts

yeah...TC is anti nintendo...no doubt from all his hate threads..including this one.

but cmon guys we got to eat ours too.. sony fanboys have been eating it all gen long with their laststation3 and now its our turn.

Avatar image for Fizzman
Fizzman

9895

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#82 Fizzman
Member since 2003 • 9895 Posts

I look at it this way. Nintendo has no hope of recreating its success with the Wii U that it had with the Wii. Too much competition today compared to five years ago.

3DS has been also released in a market that it no longer owns.

The best years for Nintendo are over.

Going after casual gamers is a good idea, but unless you constantly have the best gimmick on the market, you get burned just as bad.

Avatar image for StealthMonkey4
StealthMonkey4

7434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#83 StealthMonkey4
Member since 2009 • 7434 Posts

Wii sales are dwindling, 3DS sales are lackluster to say the least, and the Wii U's future looks kinda cloudy, I don't see it reaching the status of Wii.

Avatar image for silversix_
silversix_

26347

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#84 silversix_
Member since 2010 • 26347 Posts
Yeah, that controllers looks way too stupid. Plastic analogs are a serious *lol wut?!?!*. I bought an HDTV to look at it and not my controller with a sreen...
Avatar image for scoots9
scoots9

3505

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#85 scoots9
Member since 2006 • 3505 Posts

They'll be fine.

Avatar image for Chubith
Chubith

345

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#86 Chubith
Member since 2003 • 345 Posts

While my Wii library is about 10 games total(small compared to my ps3/pc collection. Tied with my 360 lol) I dont want nintendo to go anywhere. I grew up with nintendo. I may not agree with the direction they have taken this gen, but its nintendo man. They better not go anywhere.

That is a name you knew you could always count on for a solid fun game, for almost 30 years straight. Nintendo is not in any real trouble, unless the Wii U barely sells and they lose third party support. Even then I dont see any doom and gloom for them.

Avatar image for GD1551
GD1551

9645

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#87 GD1551
Member since 2011 • 9645 Posts

Nintendo should go 3rd party keep their handheld and leave the home console making to people who know what they are doing.

Avatar image for super600
super600

33160

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#88 super600  Moderator
Member since 2007 • 33160 Posts

Nintendo should go 3rd party keep their handheld and leave the home console making to people who know what they are doing.

GD1551

You really think sony and microsoft are the only ones thatknow what they are doing. All three major console manufactures know what they are doing. Ninty doesn't have to listen to your opinion if they want.They can try to appeal to as many people as they want.

Avatar image for GD1551
GD1551

9645

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#89 GD1551
Member since 2011 • 9645 Posts

[QUOTE="GD1551"]

Nintendo should go 3rd party keep their handheld and leave the home console making to people who know what they are doing.

super600

You really think sony and microsoft are the only ones thatknow what they are doing. All three major console manufactures know what they are doing. Ninty doesn't have to listen to your opinion if they want.They can try to appeal to as many people as they want.

Sure they can, never said they couldn't. Hopefully the investors start thinking so as well.

Avatar image for haziqonfire
haziqonfire

36392

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#90 haziqonfire
Member since 2005 • 36392 Posts

Nintendo should go 3rd party keep their handheld and leave the home console making to people who know what they are doing.

GD1551
A lot of Nintendo's past hardware are also indications that they do know what they're doing though, lol.
Avatar image for super600
super600

33160

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#91 super600  Moderator
Member since 2007 • 33160 Posts

[QUOTE="super600"]

[QUOTE="GD1551"]

Nintendo should go 3rd party keep their handheld and leave the home console making to people who know what they are doing.

GD1551

You really think sony and microsoft are the only ones thatknow what they are doing. All three major console manufactures know what they are doing. Ninty doesn't have to listen to your opinion if they want.They can try to appeal to as many people as they want.

Sure they can, never said they couldn't. Hopefully the investors start thinking so as well.

The investors don't have to follow what people think on this board. Nobody on this boardare analaysts that can predict what will happen to a certain product in the future.

Avatar image for GD1551
GD1551

9645

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#92 GD1551
Member since 2011 • 9645 Posts

[QUOTE="GD1551"]

Nintendo should go 3rd party keep their handheld and leave the home console making to people who know what they are doing.

Haziqonfire

A lot of Nintendo's past hardware are also indications that they do know what they're doing though, lol.

But they lost alot of market share going from the Snes to GC... they just tapped a different market with teh Wii this time, but it seems they are falling out of favour with them as well, time will tell though.

Avatar image for Midnightshade29
Midnightshade29

6003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 301

User Lists: 0

#93 Midnightshade29
Member since 2008 • 6003 Posts

According to this article, Nintendo's overall sales have been down and their stocks have been plummeting. Their former CEO and largest shareholder apparently just lost half a billion dollars from Nintendo's stock being drastically downgraded in value, and it's probably a result of the 3DS's premature price slashing. Nintendo's stock also took a noticeable dive after the announcement of Wii-U, which probably means investors have not been impressed with it.

Nintendo is still riding high on the fumes of the Wii and DS's success, but it would appear that good things don't last forever. Some people might argue that Nintendo was so eager to continue to re-capture that success next gen that they just added a 3 to the DS and a U to the Wii and thought they'd be set, and while that may be an oversimplification, I do think that represents the attitude they have towards the next batch of consoles. The 3DS is the DS trying to be Jimbo Cameron's Avatar, and the Wii-U is the Wii trying to be an iPad.

Nintendo's history is full of ups and downs, but it would be pretty shocking if after making one of the most successful consoles of all time Nintendo dipped right back into hardships. We won't know what fate has in store for the Wii-U until it releases, but given the lukewarm reaction to the 3DS I can't help but wonder if Nintendo's "blue ocean" has been fished-out.

Timstuff
It's sickening when one man has over a billion dollars to himself, while people are starving, can't find jobs, and homes are torn a part from disasters. The fact that the average adult makes less than $35k a year, while there are rich people with billions , is just arrgh,, aggravating. I guess what I am trying to say is... i don't feel bad for him, or them.
Avatar image for nintendoboy16
nintendoboy16

42220

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 44

User Lists: 14

#94 nintendoboy16
Member since 2007 • 42220 Posts

[QUOTE="nintendoboy16"]

[QUOTE="Timstuff"]

Do you decide a game did not deserve to get its good reviews before, or after you have played it? Because it seems like if you're going to say "This new Nintendo game for the PS4 and Xbox 720 has lots of good reviews, but I am not going to try it, because it's a bad game and the reviews are all wrong," then that's just being a spiteful fanboy.

Timstuff

And many gamers haven't disagreed with critics, or have little to no interest in some well praised games before?

Weren't you one of those who said Nintendo isn't as good as they were back then?

I do not outright deny that any of Nintendo's games are interest me, and if I had a Wii I'd be playing a lot of them. What you are saying is that you would feel spiteful towards Nintendo if they stopped making game systems, and would boycott their games if they did because you don't want to play them on their competitors systems. You can try and mask it as much as you want, but that's what it boils down to.

Look, it would just be painful to me and a lot of gamers to see Nintendo go third party and I also think it's best that we don't have a company suffer even worse than the Sonic franchise. If Nintendo took themselves out of the gaming industry, it would be for the best. When Nintendo makes good games, they (Nintendo) get bashed to hell (Sonic, though has had bad games, suffers a similar fate) by the gaming community.

Avatar image for Midnightshade29
Midnightshade29

6003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 301

User Lists: 0

#95 Midnightshade29
Member since 2008 • 6003 Posts

[QUOTE="lostfan132"]

their fine, 3ds will pick up with the sales. everyone seems to think nintendo is going to end up like sega nowadays.

Timstuff

Their war chest is too deep to run out of money like Sega did any time soon, but Nintendo still stands to lose a lot if the Wii-U and 3DS do poorly. Also, the price drop on the 3DS will not really help it until it gets a more robust game library. Being cheap is not a good enough reason for people to buy a system, which many failed game consoles stand testament to. I am no prophet of doom so I don't know what Nintendo's future holds if the next gen is a bust for them, but I do think they will have to make a drastic change from their current strategy if they want to stay in the game. It's not impossible that they could go third party if they have too many failures at once, but I don't think that's necessarily what will happen.

Also, at least unlike Sega, Nintendo does not have an evil Microsoft spy running the company into the dirt-- I'm looking at you, Bernie Stolar!

Wasn't Bernie Stolar with Playstation during it's launch too, and then left a year later to go be CEO of Sega? (seen a you-tube documentary on Sony with him as the lead exec during the ps1 launch..and that system boomed.)
Avatar image for haziqonfire
haziqonfire

36392

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#96 haziqonfire
Member since 2005 • 36392 Posts

But they lost alot of market share going from the Snes to GC... they just tapped a different market with teh Wii this time, but it seems they are falling out of favour with them as well, time will tell though.

GD1551

Well, the handheld market is a lot different than it was in 2004.

In terms of the console market, we'll see how the Wii U does, but personally I think the whole industry is headed for a downfall.

Avatar image for ZombieKiller7
ZombieKiller7

6463

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#97 ZombieKiller7
Member since 2011 • 6463 Posts
Here is the thing with Nintendo. Wii rode the wave because of media publicity from motion gaming. Motion gaming was a new thing, a fad, people were like "raaah we love motion gaming, no more kids sitting for hours, make them move." So millions of parents ran out and bought the Wii all over the world. And they sold alot of games for it. All good. Now. Kinect is the next "Raaaaah motion gaming" fad. Selling millions to people going "ooh" and "ahh." But long-term this is not what life-long gamers care about. The only STABLE market in gaming is the hardcore gamers, who game for their whole lives. Casuals, today they get Wii, tommorrow they get Kinect, next day they get 3D. Very fickle market, evaporates overnight. Ultimately these people are not reliable customers. Nintendo is recognizing this now with the failure of the 3DS. They thought 3D would bring alot of customers, nobody cares about 3D. That is why the WiiU will feature a solid chipset, because they recognize they cannot ride the "motion gaming" train anymore, they have to go back to core gaming, which means competing with other console manufacturers in price/performance. Edit : MS is the only company with its head screwed on properly. They are exploiting motion gaming fad with Kinect. Yet they are also #1 for hardcore gaming with the best GPU, best API, and good IP's like Halo and Gears. Nintendo is realizing there is a problem, but they are in deep doo-doo. WiiU won't sell anywhere near what the Wii did and 3DS is failboat. Sony is in really hot water right now, they invest so much in 3D and it's going to bite them. Nobody cares about 3D, nobody cares about Blu-Ray, nobody cares about Move. Hardcore gamers care about good solid games, good solid console performance, good graphics, a comfortable controller. MS is going to dominate the console market for the forseeable future. And either Nintendo or Sony are going to do a Sega because they are investing in stupid things nobody cares about.
Avatar image for Timstuff
Timstuff

26840

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#98 Timstuff
Member since 2002 • 26840 Posts

[QUOTE="Timstuff"]

According to this article, Nintendo's overall sales have been down and their stocks have been plummeting. Their former CEO and largest shareholder apparently just lost half a billion dollars from Nintendo's stock being drastically downgraded in value, and it's probably a result of the 3DS's premature price slashing. Nintendo's stock also took a noticeable dive after the announcement of Wii-U, which probably means investors have not been impressed with it.

Nintendo is still riding high on the fumes of the Wii and DS's success, but it would appear that good things don't last forever. Some people might argue that Nintendo was so eager to continue to re-capture that success next gen that they just added a 3 to the DS and a U to the Wii and thought they'd be set, and while that may be an oversimplification, I do think that represents the attitude they have towards the next batch of consoles. The 3DS is the DS trying to be Jimbo Cameron's Avatar, and the Wii-U is the Wii trying to be an iPad.

Nintendo's history is full of ups and downs, but it would be pretty shocking if after making one of the most successful consoles of all time Nintendo dipped right back into hardships. We won't know what fate has in store for the Wii-U until it releases, but given the lukewarm reaction to the 3DS I can't help but wonder if Nintendo's "blue ocean" has been fished-out.

Midnightshade29

It's sickening when one man has over a billion dollars to himself, while people are starving, can't find jobs, and homes are torn a part from disasters. The fact that the average adult makes less than $35k a year, while there are rich people with billions , is just arrgh,, aggravating. I guess what I am trying to say is... i don't feel bad for him, or them.

You may not like that someone can have a billion dollars, but that is how it works in free societies. You can't tell people that they are not allowed to earn over a certain amount of money, because that is putting artificial limits on how successful people can be. It' not like Yamauchi or any other billionaire is just sitting on a giant pile of gold while enjoying a constant flow of 20 year old Scotch through an I.V. drip, either. They use their money for investments, and those investments let other people get jobs so that they can find success too. Every example in history of there being rules about how rich people are allowed to be has always resulted in stifled job creation and the disappearance of the middle cIass, which is exactly what happened in the Soviet Union. It's an unsustainable economic model that can only lead to collapse. China avoided a collapse by removing their wealth limits and allowing their economy to be largely privatized, but they still have a pitiful middle cIass, and it is going to take a long time for it to recover-- if it ever does.

Avatar image for dercoo
dercoo

12555

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#99 dercoo
Member since 2006 • 12555 Posts

Nintendo is in the same position as Sony was beging of this gen with the PS3.

They just had a ****** huge console and handheld success, and their shareholders expect growth from that.(capitalism 101, grow or die)

In reality those ******** huge successes are very random, and expecting something even bigger puts Nintendo in a horrible position with their shareholders

Avatar image for Timstuff
Timstuff

26840

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#100 Timstuff
Member since 2002 • 26840 Posts

[QUOTE="Timstuff"][QUOTE="nintendoboy16"]And many gamers haven't disagreed with critics, or have little to no interest in some well praised games before?

Weren't you one of those who said Nintendo isn't as good as they were back then?

nintendoboy16

I do not outright deny that any of Nintendo's games are interest me, and if I had a Wii I'd be playing a lot of them. What you are saying is that you would feel spiteful towards Nintendo if they stopped making game systems, and would boycott their games if they did because you don't want to play them on their competitors systems. You can try and mask it as much as you want, but that's what it boils down to.

Look, it would just be painful to me and a lot of gamers to see Nintendo go third party and I also think it's best that we don't have a company suffer even worse than the Sonic franchise. If Nintendo took themselves out of the gaming industry, it would be for the best. When Nintendo makes good games, they (Nintendo) get bashed to hell (Sonic, though has had bad games, suffers a similar fate) by the gaming community.

Well then we will have to agree to disagree, because I do not think you are approaching this from a rational, unbiased perspective. As a whole I think Nintendo would really be able to shake things up if they were in the multiplatform environment, and I think that once they find their feet they'd be quite competitive with other publishers. As someone who grew up as a Nintendo fan but no longer buys their systems, I would much rather see Nintendo keep making games than see them destroyed. Why even bother being a Nintendo fan after they switch to making bath soap instead of video games? Wouldn't a true Nintendo fan want to see them make great games no matter what system they are working with, rather than wanting them to fall on the seppuku sword?