Is Resistance 2 technically superior to Gears 2? Sure seems like it.

  • 148 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for GreenGoblin2099
GreenGoblin2099

16988

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 GreenGoblin2099
Member since 2004 • 16988 Posts

Sorry, but the "I played my friend's *insert console* and can therefore fairly pass judgment that *insert game* is sucky/inferior to *insert other game*" bit didn't hold water before, and it doesn't now. Maybe if you take a picture of your friend's 360, or send someone who has a 360 a PM, you'll be believed, but why should anyone take the words of a forum poster to heart when that exact statement is used multiple times a day for deceitful purposes? If your friend is so generous with lending you his 360, then either aforementioned option shouldn't be a problem.Verge_6

lol I can easily do it (not right now though) but what do I gain if you believe me.... If I post that pic, will you say that I'm right and R2 is waaaaaay better than GeoW2, not only here but in every single other topic about the same stuf??? Don't challenge me boy, I'm a man of my word.

Avatar image for The_Game21x
The_Game21x

26440

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#52 The_Game21x
Member since 2005 • 26440 Posts

[QUOTE="The_Game21x"]I know you didn't. I just noticed you attacking the poster that played the sales card in response to another poster who played the nomination card. I figure if you're going to attack one bit of faulty logic, you might as well attack all of it.GreenGoblin2099

I see and I agree with you. However, you can't deny that a nomination can prove technical superiority, while sales don't.

Kinda like the oscar for best FX, just because (just an example, not saying it's true) The Dark Knight sales more it has better FX than LotR.

If it had been for best graphics (technical) then I would say yes, that nomination carries some weight. Seeing as the nomination has nothing to do with visuals, artistic or technical, it doesn't mean anything in this debate.
Avatar image for Verge_6
Verge_6

20282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 Verge_6
Member since 2007 • 20282 Posts
If I post that pic, will you say that I'm right and R2 is waaaaaay better than GeoW2, not only here but in every single other topic about the same stuf??? Don't challenge me boy, I'm a man of my word.

GreenGoblin2099
Why should I say any of that? If I don't own a PS3, nor RFoM2, or even GeoW2, why would I say any of that without making any judgments for myself? No, if you post such a pic of the 360 with GeoW2 on a nearby TV screen, then I'll admit I was wrong. I am challenging your claim, "boy", because "The word" of a poster on a debate forum (especially one of this nature) is worth about as much as a counterfeit peso on a deser island
Avatar image for McdonaIdsGuy
McdonaIdsGuy

3046

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 McdonaIdsGuy
Member since 2008 • 3046 Posts
R2 is more superior TECHNICALLY...its less linear, bigger bosses, more stuff going on, on screen...60 players online, etc. 1 thing i really liked about resistance was the feeling of being in a real war, i was surprised. Character detail is also more better, imo. Gears 2 just wins in textures..and overall a better storyline. Eyezonmii


The game still linear..is an FPS and it isn't an open world game,can you go everywhere in the map? thats what i thought..
Avatar image for GreenGoblin2099
GreenGoblin2099

16988

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 GreenGoblin2099
Member since 2004 • 16988 Posts
[QUOTE="GreenGoblin2099"]If I post that pic, will you say that I'm right and R2 is waaaaaay better than GeoW2, not only here but in every single other topic about the same stuf??? Don't challenge me boy, I'm a man of my word.

Verge_6

Why should I say any of that? If I don't own a PS3, nor RFoM2, or even GeoW2, why would I say any of that without making any judgments for myself? No, if you post such a pic of the 360 with GeoW2 on a nearby TV screen, then I'll admit I was wrong. I am challenging your claim, "boy", because "The word" of a poster on a debate forum (especially one of this nature) is worth about as much as a counterfeit peso on a deser island

Well, this is even worse than I thought: you don't own GeoW2 and yet you bash me for my statement. I was never bashing GeoW2 at all, saying that other game is better is not bashing a game. When you see me saying GeoW2 sux bash me all you want, cuz I'd be full of ****.

So listen, I could do it, but I don't gain anything here to even bother doing that. You choose not to believe me, fine I can definitely live with that.

Avatar image for Verge_6
Verge_6

20282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 Verge_6
Member since 2007 • 20282 Posts
[QUOTE="Verge_6"][QUOTE="GreenGoblin2099"]If I post that pic, will you say that I'm right and R2 is waaaaaay better than GeoW2, not only here but in every single other topic about the same stuf??? Don't challenge me boy, I'm a man of my word.

GreenGoblin2099

Why should I say any of that? If I don't own a PS3, nor RFoM2, or even GeoW2, why would I say any of that without making any judgments for myself? No, if you post such a pic of the 360 with GeoW2 on a nearby TV screen, then I'll admit I was wrong. I am challenging your claim, "boy", because "The word" of a poster on a debate forum (especially one of this nature) is worth about as much as a counterfeit peso on a deser island

Well, this is even worse than I thought: you don't own GeoW2 and yet you bash me for my statement. I was never bashing GeoW2 at all, saying that other game is better is not bashing a game. When you see me saying GeoW2 sux bash me all you want, cuz I'd be full of ****.

So listen, I could do it, but I don't gain anything here to even bother doing that. You choose not to believe me, fine I can definitely live with that.

You completely missed the point of my post. I wasn't "bashing" you, or your claims about Gears of War 2, but your use of the tired "I played my friend's console" bit as a basis, and that alone. "Gain" in the form of humiliation of the opposing party is a juvenile and childish approach. You can go ahead and use the whole "friend" ploy, but don't be surprised when no one believes you.
Avatar image for GreenGoblin2099
GreenGoblin2099

16988

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 GreenGoblin2099
Member since 2004 • 16988 Posts

If it had been for best graphics (technical) then I would say yes, that nomination carries some weight. Seeing as the nomination has nothing to do with visuals, artistic or technical, it doesn't mean anything in this debate.The_Game21x

Well, I see your point, but since your problem is that I bashed the sales comment let's put it this way:

"oh so now a nomination determines a game is technically better??"

"oh so now sales determine a game is technically better??"

What makes more sense to you??

Avatar image for GreenGoblin2099
GreenGoblin2099

16988

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 GreenGoblin2099
Member since 2004 • 16988 Posts

You completely missed the point of my post. I wasn't "bashing" you, or your claims about Gears of War 2, but your use of the tired "I played my friend's console" bit as a basis, and that alone. "Gain" in the form of humiliation of the opposing party is a juvenile and childish approach. You can go ahead and use the whole "friend" ploy, but don't be surprised when no one believes you.Verge_6

Listen, let's just put it this way:

Yesterday a kid who created the "my parent got a PS3 for my Christmas present" created another one defending Halo 3. Big argument there, I posted who that guy was and someone else pointed that if he wants a 360 he can't defend Halo 3 because, well he doesn't own that game... wanna know what some one said about that??

"oh he probably played it with one of his friends, what's so worng about that??"

No one refuted that. Why?? because he was defending Halo while I'm "talking bad" about GeoW2?? Bias will always exist and even if I did what you want, I bet any one can refute my pic, so as I don't gain anything, why even bother???

And no, that's not humilliation right there. You said you were going to believe me and believing me is accepting what I said, therefore saying that R2 is better than GeoW.

Avatar image for Verge_6
Verge_6

20282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 Verge_6
Member since 2007 • 20282 Posts
No one refuted that. Why?? because he was defending Halo while I'm "talking bad" about GeoW2?? Bias will always exist and even if I did what you want, I bet any one can refute my pic, so as I don't gain anything, why even bother???

And no, that's not humilliation right there. You said you were going to believe me and believing me is accepting what I said, therefore saying that R2 is better than GeoW.

GreenGoblin2099
What does that poser or bias have to do with this? If anything, it reinforces the reason why no one should believe the Friend ploy to begin with. Not humiliation? If you present an authentic picture of a 360 playing GeoW2 with your username written on a piece of paper, you're wanting me to take your own opinions of two games I have never played and make them my own. Not only that, you want me to proclaim these beliefs to other people. Sorry, but that's almost the definition of humiliation, "the abasement of pride, which creates mortification or leads to a state of being humbled or reduced to lowliness or submission". I would believe that you have, in fact, played GeoW2 for significant amount of time, which is what I was doubting at the very start. Taking on your beliefs that I never brought into play has nothing to do with this debate. Once again, taking a picture of a console and uploading it is hardly any trouble at all. Your "gain" on this amusing debate board is the ability to post said pic repeatedly in the face of other naysayers like myself, refuting them.
Avatar image for longshotgir
longshotgir

401

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 longshotgir
Member since 2007 • 401 Posts

Wow, i can't believe people still argue about this.

Ok i will try to be as clear as possible. Having played through both games, I'll try to be as unbiased as possible. Both games are really good. I enjoyed both campaigns and I think these two, along with fallout, are the best games of the year. But there is one thing i notice here... from a technical point of view, GEARS 2 IS UNDERRATED.

Why is this? People actually forget the little details this game has to offer. These little details actually require a lot of raw proccessing power and calculus. There are many things i analyzed during both games. Yes, Resistance 2 has a lot of enemies on screen, and 60 player multiplayer..but that's about it. Thetextures are muddy and the lighting is not very dynamic; this though is conpensated by the amount of detail and the marvelous artstyle. But gears 2 is more than just 12 locust and a meathead on screen. Gears 2 features a lot of dynamic ... features. The lighting affects every single polygon of the texture's and model's bump mapping;this though, is not really noticeable unless you look hard..but it''s there. Now lighting has been done before, but here i got some things that havent. Dynamic water, blood physics allows for realistic water movement and liquids are affected by wind and tiny reactions; This makes waves in the water that collide with eachother and display the reflection (which is good) in a realistic fashion. Then we have the destructible enviroments and dismemberment, you can now destruct `pilars and cover that then produces a realistic destruction (again, more calculus) and physics for every individual piece of wall. This also aplies to every character member and INTERIOR ORGANS, which sometimes go off the body..so you can have 12 enemies on screen with AI, but also 45 pieces of locust each with it's individual physics (this shows alot in horde). Now, the enemy AI is better in Resistance 2. In resistance 2 they run and take cover, and do challenging tactics. This is multiplied by the fact that it can handle up to 20-25 enemies on screen. In gears 2 horde technology allows for up to 15 (or atleast that's the highest amopunt ive seen) enemies on screen. The particle effects in both are outstanding, and both have great textures but the edge gos to gears 2 with it's high res txtureso n buildings even far away in the background. Also, both games run pretty smooth, which is an achievement for both consoles, but, here it comes, specially...Gears 2.

Now, after playing both, i can say resistance 2 just feels more 'static'. Sure , it has a lot more enemies on screen with individual AI, but a lot of processing power is needed for all the tiny details on Gears of War, a lot of tiny details that not many people seem to realise that even exist.

man i hope this wall o' text is noticed by someone :P. If yo read it all you win a free internetz :)

Avatar image for The_Game21x
The_Game21x

26440

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#61 The_Game21x
Member since 2005 • 26440 Posts

[QUOTE="The_Game21x"] If it had been for best graphics (technical) then I would say yes, that nomination carries some weight. Seeing as the nomination has nothing to do with visuals, artistic or technical, it doesn't mean anything in this debate.GreenGoblin2099

Well, I see your point, but since your problem is that I bashed the sales comment let's put it this way:

"oh so now a nomination determines a game is technically better??"

"oh so now sales determine a game is technically better??"

What makes more sense to you??

Neither.
Avatar image for GreenGoblin2099
GreenGoblin2099

16988

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 GreenGoblin2099
Member since 2004 • 16988 Posts
[QUOTE="GreenGoblin2099"]No one refuted that. Why?? because he was defending Halo while I'm "talking bad" about GeoW2?? Bias will always exist and even if I did what you want, I bet any one can refute my pic, so as I don't gain anything, why even bother???

And no, that's not humilliation right there. You said you were going to believe me and believing me is accepting what I said, therefore saying that R2 is better than GeoW.

Verge_6

What does that poser or bias have to do with this? If anything, it reinforces the reason why no one should believe the Friend ploy to begin with. Not humiliation? If you present an authentic picture of a 360 playing GeoW2 with your username written on a piece of paper, you're wanting me to take your own opinions of two games I have never played and make them my own. Not only that, you want me to proclaim these beliefs to other people. Sorry, but that's almost the definition of humiliation, "the abasement of pride, which creates mortification or leads to a state of being humbled or reduced to lowliness or submission". I would believe that you have, in fact, played GeoW2 for significant amount of time, which is what I was doubting at the very start. Taking on your beliefs that I never brought into play has nothing to do with this debate. Once again, taking a picture of a console and uploading it is hardly any trouble at all. Your "gain" on this amusing debate board is the ability to post said pic repeatedly in the face of other naysayers like myself, refuting them.

Naysayers like yourself will always be there. Like I said, even if I do post this proof you want people can always say it's fake, next they'll ask for a video, and if I do post a video they can come up with any other BS resposnse on why they don't want to take my word. Not something that worries me though.

Anyway, this is not going anywhere and trust me, contrary to popular belief, people on the internet have friends and I'm one of those. ;)

Avatar image for Verge_6
Verge_6

20282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 Verge_6
Member since 2007 • 20282 Posts
Anyway, this is not going anywhere and trust me, contrary to popular belief, people on the internet have friends and I'm one of those. ;)

GreenGoblin2099
This wasn't about you having friends or not, nor did I say anywhere that you didn't have any. Honestly, where do you pull these assumptions and ideas from? This is a rather nasty habit you have.
Avatar image for Gesyma
Gesyma

1082

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 Gesyma
Member since 2003 • 1082 Posts
I think they both have their strong points... overall I would say the scale tilts in favor of Gears2 (even if the online is BROKEN! ;) )
Avatar image for longshotgir
longshotgir

401

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 longshotgir
Member since 2007 • 401 Posts
*sigh* i should of guessed it, no one ever reads my massive monster posts :(
Avatar image for GreenGoblin2099
GreenGoblin2099

16988

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 GreenGoblin2099
Member since 2004 • 16988 Posts
[QUOTE="GreenGoblin2099"]

Well, I see your point, but since your problem is that I bashed the sales comment let's put it this way:

"oh so now a nomination determines a game is technically better??"

"oh so now sales determine a game is technically better??"

What makes more sense to you??

The_Game21x

Neither.

Probably not the right question.... what's a better question to bash someone comment??

"oh so now a nomination determines a game is technically better??" Yes, as a matter of fact a nomination can determine something is better than other stuff. Ideologically, you're going to nominate whatever is best for that category, not otherwise. IF this is not the case here, still is a harder thing to refute simply because of the "idea" behind nominations.

"oh so now sales determine a game is technically better??" Nope, sales are influenced but not necessarily determines something is better. An easier thing to refute.

Avatar image for user_nat
user_nat

3130

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 user_nat
Member since 2006 • 3130 Posts

it seems that Halo 3 is a much more grand-scale game with a lot more going on and better physics. Halo also seems to have better artistic value and better colors, which seem to give it a better overall appearance than Gears 2. Gears 2 seems like a good game, but Halo 3 just seems technically superior.

Opinions?

Baurus_1
I agree, and I also think the same stuff can be said about other games. (Hence why I replaced the Resistance mentions to Halo)
Avatar image for GreenGoblin2099
GreenGoblin2099

16988

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 GreenGoblin2099
Member since 2004 • 16988 Posts
[QUOTE="GreenGoblin2099"]Anyway, this is not going anywhere and trust me, contrary to popular belief, people on the internet have friends and I'm one of those. ;)

Verge_6

This wasn't about you having friends or not. Honestly, where do you pull these assumptions and ideas from? you've been doing it throughout this thread

I know. You wanted that proof to show everybody that I played GeoW2 so I have a word on this matter, because it's questionable what I was saying simply because I'm not the owner of the game. True, I agree. It's questionable and if people believes me or not, I don't care.

I thought I made that clear a few posts ago.

Avatar image for Eyezonmii
Eyezonmii

2145

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#69 Eyezonmii
Member since 2008 • 2145 Posts
[QUOTE="Eyezonmii"]R2 is more superior TECHNICALLY...its less linear, bigger bosses, more stuff going on, on screen...60 players online, etc. 1 thing i really liked about resistance was the feeling of being in a real war, i was surprised. Character detail is also more better, imo. Gears 2 just wins in textures..and overall a better storyline. McdonaIdsGuy


The game still linear..is an FPS and it isn't an open world game,can you go everywhere in the map? thats what i thought..

WOW, defensive much? Did i say R2 was non-linear and open world? lol....I said it was LESS linear, learn to read and think before typing. Of course R2 is linear..gsus.
Avatar image for Verge_6
Verge_6

20282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 Verge_6
Member since 2007 • 20282 Posts
[QUOTE="Verge_6"][QUOTE="GreenGoblin2099"]Anyway, this is not going anywhere and trust me, contrary to popular belief, people on the internet have friends and I'm one of those. ;)

GreenGoblin2099

This wasn't about you having friends or not. Honestly, where do you pull these assumptions and ideas from? you've been doing it throughout this thread

I know. You wanted that proof to show everybody that I played GeoW2 so I have a word on this matter, because it's questionable what I was saying simply because I'm not the owner of the game. True, I agree. It's questionable and if people believes me or not, I don't care.

I thought I made that clear a few posts ago.

Good for you, understanding that expecting people to believe it without a doubt is unreasonable. But, again, you failed to grasp my point/intent. I know you don't care. That's only too obvious, you not wanting to take a picture or anything.
Avatar image for longshotgir
longshotgir

401

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 longshotgir
Member since 2007 • 401 Posts
[QUOTE="user_nat"][QUOTE="Baurus_1"]

it seems that Halo 3 is a much more grand-scale game with a lot more going on and better physics. Halo also seems to have better artistic value and better colors, which seem to give it a better overall appearance than Gears 2. Gears 2 seems like a good game, but Halo 3 just seems technically superior.

Opinions?

I agree, and I also think the same stuff can be said about other games. (Hence why I replaced the Resistance mentions to Halo)

I can't think of a way of saying this without sounding disrespectful, so excuse me but wat?
Avatar image for user_nat
user_nat

3130

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 user_nat
Member since 2006 • 3130 Posts
[QUOTE="user_nat"][QUOTE="Baurus_1"]

it seems that Halo 3 is a much more grand-scale game with a lot more going on and better physics. Halo also seems to have better artistic value and better colors, which seem to give it a better overall appearance than Gears 2. Gears 2 seems like a good game, but Halo 3 just seems technically superior.

Opinions?

longshotgir

I agree, and I also think the same stuff can be said about other games. (Hence why I replaced the Resistance mentions to Halo)

I can't think of a way of saying this without sounding disrespectful, so excuse me but wat?

I agree with him that Resistance is technically superior to Gears 2?

I simply brought up Halo because a friend and I were making the same comparison to gears recently.

Also, why are Resistance and Gears always compared, when Resistance and Halo are actually much more similar.

Avatar image for GreenGoblin2099
GreenGoblin2099

16988

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 GreenGoblin2099
Member since 2004 • 16988 Posts

I said I could but I don't see any gain here. It's too much trouble to drive my car through tomorrows traffic to get over my friend's, JUST to get a "ok I believe you now". Now trust me, I have this friend and everything I said.

If you chose to believe GeoW2 is better than R2 so be it, I don't care either. It's not like I made R2 or that it will kill me to say something else is better than this game.

In fact, I'll let you in a not-so-secret as I've said this many times before: I like the original Rsistance better. And you won't be seeing me claiming RFoM is better than GeoW2 ;)

Avatar image for Baurus_1
Baurus_1

804

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#74 Baurus_1
Member since 2007 • 804 Posts

Honestly, what would you rather play?

This?

Or this?

Avatar image for AdmiralDan
AdmiralDan

1231

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#75 AdmiralDan
Member since 2003 • 1231 Posts

I said I could but I don't see any gain here. It's too much trouble to drive my car through tomorrows traffic to get over my friend's, JUST to get a "ok I believe you now". Now trust me, I have this friend and everything I said.

If you chose to believe GeoW2 is better than R2 so be it, I don't care either. It's not like I made R2 or that it will kill me to say something else is better than this game.

In fact, I'll let you in a not-so-secret as I've said this many times before: I like the original Rsistance better. And you won't be seeing me claiming RFoM is better than GeoW2 ;)

GreenGoblin2099
Ugh. if you don't care then why are you still here? You know, I have a friend who owns a Porche, so I will pass judgment on the quality of that car, too. Don't believe me? F!*k you! I don't care what you say...Why did I mention the Porche, you ask? Hmm... And a nomination for GOTY has nothing to do with technical superiority. You do realize Braid is also on the list? Nominations for GOTY take into account production values, playability, story, acting, etc. Technical aspects are only one component. Your logic is flawed. And in case you are skeptical my friend says so too.
Avatar image for SeanBond
SeanBond

2136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 SeanBond
Member since 2003 • 2136 Posts

[QUOTE="Fumpa"][QUOTE="EVOLV3"]Yes, Resistance 2 is superior, as shown by the fact that it is a GOTY nomineee, while Gears 2 is not.GreenGoblin2099

Actually it's quite obvious that Gears 2 is better because it has sold more copies than Resistance 2.

So now technical quality is determined on the number of sales??? wow!! lemmings are amusing people :lol:

Well...You could argue that sales are a better indicator of overall popularity of a game than one website's idea of GotY nominees...
Avatar image for GreenGoblin2099
GreenGoblin2099

16988

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#77 GreenGoblin2099
Member since 2004 • 16988 Posts
[QUOTE="GreenGoblin2099"]

I said I could but I don't see any gain here. It's too much trouble to drive my car through tomorrows traffic to get over my friend's, JUST to get a "ok I believe you now". Now trust me, I have this friend and everything I said.

If you chose to believe GeoW2 is better than R2 so be it, I don't care either. It's not like I made R2 or that it will kill me to say something else is better than this game.

In fact, I'll let you in a not-so-secret as I've said this many times before: I like the original Rsistance better. And you won't be seeing me claiming RFoM is better than GeoW2 ;)

AdmiralDan

And a nomination for GOTY has nothing to do with technical superiority. You do realize Braid is also on the list? Nominations for GOTY take into account production values, playability, story, acting, etc. Technical aspects are only one component.

Nope those are not the only aspects, more of a reason on why R2 is better than GeoW2, since R2 got nominated and GeoW2 didn't lolololololololol

Thanx mate you made it sooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo easy. Man you don't know how hard I'm laughing here :lol:

Avatar image for GreenGoblin2099
GreenGoblin2099

16988

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#78 GreenGoblin2099
Member since 2004 • 16988 Posts
[QUOTE="GreenGoblin2099"]

[QUOTE="Fumpa"] Actually it's quite obvious that Gears 2 is better because it has sold more copies than Resistance 2.SeanBond

So now technical quality is determined on the number of sales??? wow!! lemmings are amusing people :lol:

Well...You could argue that sales are a better indicator of overall popularity of a game than one website's idea of GotY nominees...

Yes, indeed. Clever :D

Avatar image for Arctic_Grillz
Arctic_Grillz

2749

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 Arctic_Grillz
Member since 2008 • 2749 Posts

Ugh. if you don't care then why are you still here? You know, I have a friend who owns a Porche, so I will pass judgment on the quality of that car, too. Don't believe me? F!*k you! I don't care what you say...Why did I mention the Porche, you ask? Hmm...

It's Porsche, not Porche.
Avatar image for sebbi11
sebbi11

1190

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#80 sebbi11
Member since 2004 • 1190 Posts

I got em both, try playing them, R2 is comparable to halo 2, at best. Graphics, movement, physics... the game is a big disappointment. It gets a 9 only because the previous one got an 8,5 and that one was overrated as well.GoW2 was solid, but nothing spectacular. Deserved the 9.
Avatar image for world69star69
world69star69

1401

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#81 world69star69
Member since 2005 • 1401 Posts

I haven't played either game, but from the videos I have seen on the internet, it seems that Resistance 2 is a much more grand-scale game with a lot more going on and better physics. Resistance also seems to have better artistic value and better colors, which seem to give it a better overall appearance than Gears 2. Gears 2 seems like a good game, but Resistance 2 just seems technically superior.

Opinions?

Baurus_1
YES r2 is technically superior it is a grander scale, and with 100s of enemies on the screen at once...gears 2 is more focused. Then there is the fact of 10player mp in gears2(5vs 5 max) to 60player mp in r2 60 players on console game at the same time without any lag ever! r2 ftw!!!
Avatar image for McdonaIdsGuy
McdonaIdsGuy

3046

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#82 McdonaIdsGuy
Member since 2008 • 3046 Posts
[QUOTE="world69star69"] YES r2 is technically superior it is a grander scale, and with 100s of enemies on the screen at once...

i just loled.
Avatar image for II_Seraphim_II
II_Seraphim_II

20534

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#83 II_Seraphim_II
Member since 2007 • 20534 Posts
I dunno TC. Resistance2 is alot bigger than Gears2 but Gears2 is alot prettier than Resistance2
Avatar image for NewsKing
NewsKing

84

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#84 NewsKing
Member since 2008 • 84 Posts

No, definitely not.

Avatar image for Ninja-Hippo
Ninja-Hippo

23434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#85 Ninja-Hippo
Member since 2008 • 23434 Posts
Yes, Resistance 2 is superior, as shown by the fact that it is a GOTY nomineee, while Gears 2 is not.EVOLV3
Do you genuinely believe that? Do you not think it's ridiculous that it hasnt been nominated, whereas Fallout 3, Burnout, Braid and Resistance have, all of which are of inferior or equal quality to gears?
Avatar image for speedsix
speedsix

1076

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#86 speedsix
Member since 2003 • 1076 Posts

Honestly, what would you rather play?

Baurus_1

Looking at reviews and sales, obviously most people would rather player Gears.

Avatar image for EuroMafia
EuroMafia

7026

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#87 EuroMafia
Member since 2008 • 7026 Posts
I disagree.
Avatar image for cuddlesofwar
cuddlesofwar

1138

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#88 cuddlesofwar
Member since 2008 • 1138 Posts

[QUOTE="Fumpa"][QUOTE="EVOLV3"]Yes, Resistance 2 is superior, as shown by the fact that it is a GOTY nomineee, while Gears 2 is not.bez2083

Actually it's quite obvious that Gears 2 is better because it has sold more copies than Resistance 2.

So if Britney Spears outsells The Beatles, she then becomes superior?! If I had shoes on, I'd throw them at you.

Well, it looks better, plays better (going by reviews) and is more popular ... So yeah If Britney spears was more popular then the Beatles, and generally considered better, she would be better.
Avatar image for CreepyBacon
CreepyBacon

3183

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#89 CreepyBacon
Member since 2005 • 3183 Posts

What a surprise, sony fanboys blowing yet another game out the water with lies.

Someone get in here and show me a video of "hundreds of people" on screen at once. Do it. Isn't going to happen cause it doesn't exist, no more than gears 2 "hundreds on screen does".

Besides, technically superior? Who cares, R2 doesn't have any moments as Epic as this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ialrYDx2qlw

Avatar image for Floppy_Jim
Floppy_Jim

25933

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#90 Floppy_Jim
Member since 2007 • 25933 Posts
Well Gears looks better, but Resistance is much bigger with a lot more on screen at once. I'm not a game developer so I don't know which is technically superior.
Avatar image for McdonaIdsGuy
McdonaIdsGuy

3046

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#91 McdonaIdsGuy
Member since 2008 • 3046 Posts

What a surprise, sony fanboys blowing yet another game out the water with lies.

Someone get in here and show me a video of "hundreds of people" on screen at once. Do it. Isn't going to happen cause it doesn't exist, no more than gears 2 "hundreds on screen does".

Besides, technically superior? Who cares, R2 doesn't have any moments as Epic as this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ialrYDx2qlw

CreepyBacon
I agree,there isn't any 100 of enemies on the screen thingy...
Avatar image for sonny2dap
sonny2dap

2215

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#92 sonny2dap
Member since 2008 • 2215 Posts
which is generally considered the better more popular game? theres your answer /thread
Avatar image for onewiththegame
onewiththegame

4415

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#93 onewiththegame
Member since 2004 • 4415 Posts
9=9 thats all I'm going to say
Avatar image for Burnsmiesta
Burnsmiesta

1672

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#94 Burnsmiesta
Member since 2004 • 1672 Posts
I couldn't give two flying hoots, they are both quality games and the experience they provide comes down to the players taste (or more likely whichever console they own).
What I find amusing is watching GeOW2 and R2 fanboys go at it.
Avatar image for killzowned24
killzowned24

7345

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#95 killzowned24
Member since 2007 • 7345 Posts
yes, R2 is technically better. far more stuff on screen and runs better better textures and lighting + water.
Avatar image for deactivated-63f6895020e66
deactivated-63f6895020e66

21177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#96 deactivated-63f6895020e66
Member since 2004 • 21177 Posts
[QUOTE="killzowned24"]yes, R2 is technically better. far more stuff on screen and runs better better textures and lighting + water.

The expert has talked.
Avatar image for wasNINnowMSX
wasNINnowMSX

56

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#97 wasNINnowMSX
Member since 2006 • 56 Posts
[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"]

Errr, heck no. Gears 2 is so much more technically superior that it's not even funny. I own and have played/completed both.

nVidiaGaMer

However 60 players and 60fps is not something that Gears 2 can do even if they were to lower the graphics.

hahah you've obviously havent heard about the gears engine the game was mad specificly to run at 60 fps with over 100 enimies plus everything going on on screen.. google it theres videos on it.. better yet youtube it.. its on there. also go play horde

Avatar image for The_Game21x
The_Game21x

26440

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#98 The_Game21x
Member since 2005 • 26440 Posts
[QUOTE="killzowned24"]yes, R2 is technically better. far more stuff on screen and runs better better textures and lighting + water.

I'm beginning to wonder if you people have even played Gears 2... This isn't Gears 1 people. You will fight far more than four enemies at any given time throughout the campaign and in the Horde mode.
Avatar image for killzowned24
killzowned24

7345

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#99 killzowned24
Member since 2007 • 7345 Posts
[QUOTE="The_Game21x"][QUOTE="killzowned24"]yes, R2 is technically better. far more stuff on screen and runs better better textures and lighting + water.

I'm beginning to wonder if you people have even played Gears 2... This isn't Gears 1 people. You will fight far more than four enemies at any given time throughout the campaign and in the Horde mode.

no. the only time there is more is if your on a vehicle and they are massively dumbed down to not even matter.
Avatar image for wasNINnowMSX
wasNINnowMSX

56

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#100 wasNINnowMSX
Member since 2006 • 56 Posts
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zeIEhlN3Jqw please watch and listen.. 1.05 is were you will hear about the 100 enimies on screen at any given time