There are lots of opinions from developers that say the opposite. http://www.gamedaily.com/articles/features/ps3-is-not-more-powerful-than-xbox-360-says-ex-harmonix-dev/71102/?biz=1 Here is an old article from IGN that claimed the XBox 360 was more powerful. LOL!! Like I said. It's just an opinion. They are equally as powerful. PS3 is not more powerful. http://xbox360.ign.com/articles/617/617951p1.html You can search for the others.[QUOTE="blackace"][QUOTE="Solquid_Snake"]
Which other publications have the Xbox 360 winning? I'd like to see them.
Solquid_Snake
1st of all, the Harmonix dev did not supply a breakdown and pretty much said "the PS3 is not much stronger" (which still means it is stronger anyway).
2nd of all, your IGN article was posted a YEAR before the PS3 was released, and it was posted when Sony was still going with the boomerang controller. Statistics changed.
well Carmack did say the ps3 has a higher peak power, but 360's power is easier to exploit. Crytek said that ps3 has better physics and lighting but the 360 still has better shaders I think most evidence supports these things, for the most part ps3 might be able to achieve a higher throughput but its not as flexible, while the 360 can maintain a higher throughput in most cases, just not reaching the highest point of ps3 can reach. and then IBM did kind of mention that are almost the same, so... There is absolutly no evidence that actually supports ps3 being more powerful then 360... or 360 being more powerful then ps3
Log in to comment