Isnt it IRONIC reguarding Cows and the Gears of War franchise being milked......

I feel ignored.

GamingGod999

Who said Gears was milked?  I've never seen someone claim that, I have seen people claim that MS uses the same 4 franchises every other year with Halo/Forza/Fable/Gears.  Forza had 4 games this gen (almost catching up to Gran Turismo :shock: ), Gears will have 4 when Judgment comes out, Fable has had 5, and Halo has had 5 games this gen as well (6 if you count Anniversary).

And way to combined Uncharted games from two separate platforms, if MS had a handheld you'd see a Gears game on it.  I wouldn't count that has "milking".

Oh, and you failed to include Gears of War Judgment.

*Included Fable 2: Pub Games, Fable Journey, and Fable Heroes, since you decided to include Uncharted: Fight for Fortune ;) *

[QUOTE="GamingGod999"]

I feel ignored.

MstaPrimeMnista

Will you be my friend, MstaPrime? :oops:

God of war is even worse. Just think how many times they released the PS2 games in different versions, PS3 versions, handheld versions.

Gears of war is even worse. Just think how many times they released the PS2 games in different versions, PS3 versions, handheld versions.CanYouDiglt

[QUOTE="CanYouDiglt"]Gears of war is even worse. Just think how many times they released the PS2 games in different versions, PS3 versions, handheld versions.GamingGod999

[QUOTE="CanYouDiglt"]Gears of war is even worse. Just think how many times they released the PS2 games in different versions, PS3 versions, handheld versions.GamingGod999

lol

lems are burning themselves here

please, someone think of the lemmings!

TBH, i'm still looking for a strict definition of milking. Is it one a year? Two a year? Three a year? More?

One every 2 years? One every 1.5 years? 

lundy86_4

I provided that criteria for you in the OP. According to Cows, 3 games in 7 years (two of which with a 3 year gap between them) is milking.

But also according to Cows, 5 games in 6 years is not milking. :)

Will you be my friend, MstaPrime? :oops:

GamingGod999

[QUOTE="StrongDeadlift"][QUOTE="SonySoldier-_-"]

ok so each console has 3 games. why are you adding the ps vita version? :lol:

I guess you better add the Gears PC version as well. ogh thats right that would make your weak argument look bad.

SonySoldier-_-

[QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

TBH, i'm still looking for a strict definition of milking. Is it one a year? Two a year? Three a year? More?

One every 2 years? One every 1.5 years? 

StrongDeadlift

I provided that criteria for you in the OP. According to Cows, 3 games in 7 years (two of which with a 3 year gap between them) is milking.

But also according to Cows, 5 games in 6 years is not milking. :)

Yeah... Not really a "definition"... More a conglomorate of innaccurate "opinions", which don't hold up to criticism.
Did you get over spelling "hypocrisy" wrong yet, whilst insulting my intelligence? :lol:

This thread is glorious. 

Gears of war is even worse. Just think how many times they released the PS2 games in different versions, PS3 versions, handheld versions.CanYouDiglt

What really matters is that Sony still releases tons of games along with their bigger franchises. MS just releases the same 3, with some Kinect added in there.

[QUOTE="StrongDeadlift"]

[QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

TBH, i'm still looking for a strict definition of milking. Is it one a year? Two a year? Three a year? More?

One every 2 years? One every 1.5 years? 

lundy86_4

I provided that criteria for you in the OP. According to Cows, 3 games in 7 years (two of which with a 3 year gap between them) is milking.

But also according to Cows, 5 games in 6 years is not milking. :)

Yeah... Not really a "definition"... More a conglomorate of innaccurate "opinions", which don't hold up to criticism.
Did you get over spelling "hypocrisy" wrong yet, whilst insulting my intelligence? :lol:

This thread is glorious. 

[QUOTE="StrongDeadlift"]

[QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

TBH, i'm still looking for a strict definition of milking. Is it one a year? Two a year? Three a year? More?

One every 2 years? One every 1.5 years? 

lundy86_4

I provided that criteria for you in the OP. According to Cows, 3 games in 7 years (two of which with a 3 year gap between them) is milking.

But also according to Cows, 5 games in 6 years is not milking. :)

Yeah... Not really a "definition"... More a conglomorate of innaccurate "opinions", which don't hold up to criticism.
Did you get over spelling "hypocrisy" wrong yet, whilst insulting my intelligence? :lol:

This thread is glorious. 

"hippocracy"

:lol: What an embarrassment.

If you haven't learned yet there's one rule for Sony and screw everybody else.

God of war is even worse. Just think how many times they released the PS2 games in different versions, PS3 versions, handheld versions.

CanYouDiglt

Even worse.

This could start to get messy :P

[QUOTE="seanmcloughlin"]

[QUOTE="Vatusus"]

GA above Uncharted 3?

B*tch puleeease

Funny enough Uncharted 3 is my fav of those

haters gonna hate

Vatusus

If all you care about are visuals and set pieces then U3 wins. But overall it's the worst in the series. It was a massive let down. Poor story, bad pacing, dull and unevolved characters, set pieces for the sake of set pieces and not nearly as whimsical and quirky as it thinks it is. 

The story is more or less the same as Ucharted 2, so I dont get the problem people that loved U2 had with Unharted 3 other tha "being the same".

Who the hell even says this? Uncharted 3's story was so poorly written it's stupid. At least they admitted they wrote it after they thought of the set pieces.

Bad pacing? I disagree. Besides the first couple of levels it actually was the most well paced game in the series imo. First levels were pretty awesome, then the game becomes dull set piece after dull set piece. Characters? Again, I dont see the problem people had with U3 characters when they were pretty much the same as U2, and the good characters leave halfway through the game besides the main villain that was definitely more charismatic in U2...

:lol:

All the villains were complete rubbish in Uncharted 3. I'll use spoiler tags because better safe than sorry

[spoiler] Ramses is a dumbf*ck. The Sully thing was poorly done and the entire time I was playing it, I was thinking "damn it Henning, everyone knows Ramses doesn't actually have Sully." His "workers" are incompetent as balls (7 or 8 dudes, Drake's tied up in a chair, just being in that fight made me feel stupid, let alone winning it), and yet he somehow lets one guy try to tie up Drake after Drake took down at least a hundred of Ramses' men. Then of course, Drake somehow shoots him in the most convinient way. Granted, Nate did the same thing with Sully in Uncharted 1's end, but at least Navarro was prepared for that. Smooth filler ND.

The British dude whose name I forgot, all he was there for is Nate's acid trips and plot deficiencies, like vanishing randomly and surviving the bullet in the chest (Henning actually had to use Twitter to explain this, which is just an awful way to have a career in storytelling. He, along with Marlowe, are part of some BS group that does nothing in the game but act as some reason for why they have money and of course, they're both the biggest wusses in the Uncharted universe. Seriously, after they don't kill Cutter and he jumps off the rooftops, I couldn't believe that ND was trying to make these guys seem hostile in any way. At least the baddies in the first two games weren't afraid to kill. [/spoiler]

And now I tell you guys why U3 is my fav in the series

1. More and better puzzles. U1 and U2 puzzles were p*ss easy, while U3 puzzles made me scratch my head a couple of times. And the fact that they were actually clever this time around imo I dislike all puzzles in the series, but you're right, these ones at least made us think.

2. More platforming/traversal sections than shooting sections. For someone that is tired of shooters as I am, that was a big plus for me

I can see what you mean from wearing out on shooters, but it's not like Uncharted 3 did shooting or platforming particularily well. The first game shooting masterfully and made platforming quick, the second made shooting a little easier than I would have liked and platforming sometimes became obnoxious when the game focused on it.

3. Improved melee combat that was actually fun to experiment with this time around.

I'm not even going to comment on how bad the melee system was. I think I might be able to pull up a few paragraphs I wrote from the past on how bad it was.

4. The best set pieces in the series. The boat part is among the most jaw-droping levels this whole gen for me

Lol. The best set piece in the series is when the game wasn't trying to go for set pieces, like Uncharted 1 and infiltrating the entire fortress. I don't even know when Uncharted became the set piece franchise, in ND's mind, 2 didn't have that many anyways.

so no, its not only because of set pieces and visuals

The game stunk all around, agreed. The visuals were gorgeous, agreed

[QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

[QUOTE="StrongDeadlift"]

I provided that criteria for you in the OP. According to Cows, 3 games in 7 years (two of which with a 3 year gap between them) is milking.

But also according to Cows, 5 games in 6 years is not milking. :)

StrongDeadlift

Yeah... Not really a "definition"... More a conglomorate of innaccurate "opinions", which don't hold up to criticism.
Did you get over spelling "hypocrisy" wrong yet, whilst insulting my intelligence? :lol:

This thread is glorious. 

Errrm... The "milking" definition (i.e. the time frame) is the opinion :? Clearly, English is hard for you...

What timeframe dictates milking? Also, how is spelling "hypocrisy" as "hippocracy", intelligent?

Do we need to keep going with this charade?

StrongDeadlift

What really matters is that Sony still releases tons of games along with their bigger franchises. MS just releases the same 3, with some Kinect added in there.

ImBatman-

"hippocracy"

:lol: What an embarrassment.

Obviously_Right

It really is... I understand spelling mistakes, but spelling hypocrisy like a:

Is embarassing.

[QUOTE="ImBatman-"]

What really matters is that Sony still releases tons of games along with their bigger franchises. MS just releases the same 3, with some Kinect added in there.

StrongDeadlift

Errrm... The "milking" definition (i.e. the time frame) is the opinion :? Clearly, English is hard for you...

What timeframe dictates milking? Also, how is spelling "hypocrisy" as "hippocracy", intelligent?

Do we need to keep going with this charade?

lundy86_4

The time frame stated is the timeframe that each franchise has been around for.  That is not an opinion.  :|

Gears has 3 games in 7 years.  

Uncharted has 5 games in 6 years.  

2/10.

[QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

Errrm... The "milking" definition (i.e. the time frame) is the opinion :? Clearly, English is hard for you...

What timeframe dictates milking? Also, how is spelling "hypocrisy" as "hippocracy", intelligent?

Do we need to keep going with this charade?

StrongDeadlift

The time frame stated is the timeframe that each franchise has been around for.  That is not an opinion.  :|

Gears has 3 games in 7 years.  

Uncharted has 5 games in 6 years.  

2/10.

You didn't answer these questions:

1. What timeframe dictates milking?
2. How is spelling "hypocrisy" as "hippocracy", intelligent?

Good job... Did you even read the post?

Do you need to try again?

[QUOTE="MonsieurX"]Never heard about GeOw milkedPrimordialous

Same.

Both franchises aren't really that milked I mean not compared to say *ahem* Street Fighter no where near. Over 50 Street Fighter games have been released. Basicaly Capcom has been re-releasing the same game for over 20 years now. I just can't believe how gaming fans can't see trought this how Capcom continue to get a way with this is beyond me. They have released the same game more than 50 times now and fans still continues to buy them.

2007-2012: 5 years, 6 games.

 

2007-2012: 5 years, 6 games.

rjdofu

2009-2013. 4 years, 5 games.  

[QUOTE="rjdofu"]

 

2007-2012: 5 years, 6 games.

StrongDeadlift

2009-2013. 4 years, 5 games.  

Only one GoW console game this generation. There about to be 2. Handhelds are of course going to have addition games to inflate the numbersNEWMAHAY

If Halo Anniversary counts as a game, then the collections count as games.  I used the same criteria.  

Every title listed is an official PS3 retail titles.  

rjdofu

HNNNGGGG.  

Looking at this makes me moist :|

[QUOTE="NEWMAHAY"]Only one GoW console game this generation. There about to be 2. Handhelds are of course going to have addition games to inflate the numbersStrongDeadlift

If Halo Anniversary counts as a game, then the collections count as games.  I used the same criteria.  

Every title listed is an official PS3 retail titles.  

rjdofu

HNNNGGGG.  

Looking at this makes me moist :|

Those franchise are more milked than UC/GT/ Gow or KZ (either or). Its not like its a big deal but I think people are complaining about whats happening in the latter half of the generation. Its almost over and it doesn't really matter anymore. Only Nintendo truly milks their franchises out of the big three and third parties are seriously so much worse (activision especially).

I think we should just hope for more diversity at the start of next-generation than what we have in the last years of this one. At least the games coming out is AAA, if the quality was sh** then I think people would be justified in complaining.

I am not whinning about Halo, because Halo 4 was one of my favorite games last year. Its probably the best console shooter this generation. (but in terms of milkage in the gaming world its worst than sony's franchises)

[QUOTE="NEWMAHAY"]Only one GoW console game this generation. There about to be 2. Handhelds are of course going to have addition games to inflate the numbersStrongDeadlift

If Halo Anniversary counts as a game, then the collections count as games.  I used the same criteria.  

Every title listed is an official PS3 retail titles.  

rjdofu

HNNNGGGG.  

Looking at this makes me moist :|

[QUOTE="CanYouDiglt"]

God of war is even worse. Just think how many times they released the PS2 games in different versions, PS3 versions, handheld versions.

StrongDeadlift

Even worse.

This could start to get messy :P

You disclaime people who was listing Gears on the PC as a example because you stated that Gears on the 360 is the exact same game. Well, with this, GOW: Saga, GOW: Collections, and GOW3 are the same  EXACT games.:lol:

BTW, LOLZ @ you putting Ascension down, but leaving Judgement out on the Gears side.:lol:

[QUOTE="NEWMAHAY"]Only one GoW console game this generation. There about to be 2. Handhelds are of course going to have addition games to inflate the numbersStrongDeadlift

If Halo Anniversary counts as a game, then the collections count as games.  I used the same criteria.  

Every title listed is an official PS3 retail titles.  

rjdofu

HNNNGGGG.  

Looking at this makes me moist :|

What do cows have to do with gears of war?

[QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

TBH, i'm still looking for a strict definition of milking. Is it one a year? Two a year? Three a year? More?

One every 2 years? One every 1.5 years? 

StrongDeadlift

I provided that criteria for you in the OP. According to Cows, 3 games in 7 years (two of which with a 3 year gap between them) is milking.

But also according to Cows, 5 games in 6 years is not milking. :)

Anything nowadays can be judged as milked.

Putting them in order of quality just for fun

>>>>>>>>>>/=>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

 

 

If you own all three systems there, than there's a large amount of good games to be had. Irony aside, I'm happy.

Blabadon