[QUOTE="sonicmj1"][QUOTE="Zerostatic0"]I seriously hate this dude. Someone needs to organize a protest of gamers. Get like 10,000 people to protest in front of his house or something, so he can get the message, there are a lot more people against him then with him. Stop trying to impede on my civil liberties. If I wanna play a game where I cut a hookers breast off, eat them, and then take a dump on top of the bible, that is my right.sexy_luigi
But if we do that, he'll just think we were riled up by Gamestop, Take Two's partner in racketeering!
I dislike what he's trying to do also, but at this point, I've begun to realize that he's really just harmless. He's too fanatical to do anything intelligent enough to be damaging.
He's more funny to watch than anything else.
I have nothing against violence in games for artisitc purposes, im more against making something violent for the sake of free publicity
Grand Theft Auto is violent for a reason. The game could not exist in the form that it is in without being violent. Removing the violence from Grand Theft Auto would severely hamper the freedom that is the hallmark of the game, and it would make your character's identity inauthentic. Rockstar doesn't make its games violent for publicity. It makes them violent because it makes sense in the context of the game. If they did that for publicity, you would have seen more violence in Bully, such that it would not have earned a T rating.
Besides, if we crack down on games like GTA and Manhunt (which have no purpose for their violence, in your view), who's going to draw the line between which games are 'art' and which games are gratuitously violent? It would still create a chilling effect on violence in games, whether the violence makes sense or not.Â
Log in to comment