Jonathan Blow Talks PS4 hardware: equivalent game will run faster than PC

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Cranler
Cranler

8809

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#101 Cranler
Member since 2005 • 8809 Posts
[QUOTE="StrongDeadlift"]

[QUOTE="HaloinventedFPS"]

Fun Fact: PS4's OS uses more ram than Windows 8

Do you have anything of substance to back this up? :?

Doesnt matter since gaming pc's have plenty of ram for any game. Windows 7 uses about 2gb without tweaking but most gamers have 4 or more gb of system ram. Most games use 1gb or less of ram. 8 gb of ddr3 is $60.
Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#102 tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33793 Posts
[QUOTE="tormentos"][QUOTE="04dcarraher"] my $700 2007 gaming says hi , vs the PS3 $500 or $600 modelsclyde46
The PS3 is a 2006 console the 360 2005,hell the PS3 would also be 2005 if it wasn't for a blu-ray diode shortage. And considering how much a liar you are i really doubt it..

He's not a liar.

Yes he is,is the reason i actually asked for spec this should be fun..
Avatar image for RyviusARC
RyviusARC

5708

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#103 RyviusARC
Member since 2011 • 5708 Posts

[QUOTE="RyviusARC"]

[QUOTE="xboxiphoneps3"]

 

fun fact: PS4 doesnt have API overhead or DirectX in the way so they are able to squeeze 2x more performance out a console over a similiarly specced PC

xboxiphoneps3

 

If that were true then why does an 8600gt perform similar or better than a 360/PS3?

The 8600gt is pretty much similar in power to the 360/PS3 so if what you said were true then those consoles should be performing twice as well.

Show me a 8800 GT producing Uncharted/gears of war graphics on 512 mb of total system ram...will never happen

 

RAM does not equal processing power.

RAM is used to store textures and asset data.

My point still stands.

Show me the 360/PS3 performing twice as well as an 8600gt.....answer is you can't.

Also an 8600gt can run Gears of War at higher settings than the 360.

Avatar image for Cranler
Cranler

8809

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#105 Cranler
Member since 2005 • 8809 Posts
[QUOTE="princeofshapeir"][QUOTE="Mystic-G"]

Every PC gamer must know and admit that it's not the cpu or gpu that makes a performance difference, it's the speed of the RAM. CPUs and GPUs are just there for asthetic purposes.

Well, with that sh*t PC you have there in your sig, I can understand why you'd spout nonsensical drivel like that.

Sarcasm detector broken?
Avatar image for MK-Professor
MK-Professor

4218

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#106 MK-Professor
Member since 2009 • 4218 Posts

[QUOTE="MK-Professor"]

 

 

[QUOTE="xboxiphoneps3"] Ps3, 360 gpu is worse then the x1950... Plus i have no doubt in my mind that if the ps3/360 came with more ram, graphics would look noticeably better then they do now Current gen consoles are extremely limited by the lack of RAMtormentos

The ati x1950pro(248 GFLOPs) is similar(architecture and GFLOPs wise) to the  Xbox GPU(240 GFLOPs). Also more vram equal not more performance, if you have a low-end GPU more vram will not give you more perfoirmace. it is that simpel low-end GPU can use a low amount of vram, high-end GPU can use more vram.

http://www.anandtech.com/show/6359/the-nvidia-geforce-gtx-650-ti-review/15 Argument destroy...

lol NO...

the HD7850 or 650ti meant to have 2GB vram the same way the 8800GT meant to have 512MB vram

8800GT 512MB vs 8800GT 1Gb = 0 performance deference

8800GT 512MB vs 8800GT 256MB = big performance deference

the same goes for the rest...

HD7850 2Gb vs HD7850 4Gb = 0 performance deference

HD7850 2Gb vs HD7850 1Gb = big performance deference

 

 

Avatar image for princeofshapeir
princeofshapeir

16652

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#107 princeofshapeir
Member since 2006 • 16652 Posts
[QUOTE="Cranler"][QUOTE="princeofshapeir"][QUOTE="Mystic-G"]

Every PC gamer must know and admit that it's not the cpu or gpu that makes a performance difference, it's the speed of the RAM. CPUs and GPUs are just there for asthetic purposes.

Well, with that sh*t PC you have there in your sig, I can understand why you'd spout nonsensical drivel like that.

Sarcasm detector broken?

It's been broken ever since SDC.
Avatar image for 04dcarraher
04dcarraher

23858

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#108 04dcarraher
Member since 2004 • 23858 Posts

[QUOTE="tormentos"][QUOTE="04dcarraher"] my $700 2007 gaming says hi , vs the PS3 $500 or $600 modelsclyde46
The PS3 is a 2006 console the 360 2005,hell the PS3 would also be 2005 if it wasn't for a blu-ray diode shortage. And considering how much a liar you are i really doubt it..

He's not a liar.

:lol: tormenting tormentos is fun

my pc in 2007 had

Athlon X2 6000 @ 3.2 ghz (200mhz OC)

ASUS M2N motherboard

4gb DDR2 800mhz

500gb harddrive

xfx 8800GT alpha dog edition 512mb.

cost $705

Avatar image for Cranler
Cranler

8809

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#109 Cranler
Member since 2005 • 8809 Posts

[QUOTE="tormentos"][QUOTE="Tessellation"] they will ignore this,every time this is brought up they act like i never happen because it makes them butthurt :cool:Mrmedia01

I will not the best part is price PS2 $300 PC $3,000..:lol:

lol

PS4 $400 to $550 VS $1000 Gaming PC (Not including a monitor)

 

I will save some money and go PS4. Of course its not going to beat a PC in the long run but I don't want to upgrade a gaming PC very year with a new Video card and CPU. In 10 years if I did that I would end up spending another $3000 probably on my PC.

The sad thing is PC gamers do spend that much in a few years of owning tehre gaming PC, So no thanks, I am content with a powerful console that can be better optimized for and can have the hardware pushed by Devs.

In most cases pc gamers continue to upgrade out of want, not need. A high end pc now will last through the next gen.
Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#110 tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33793 Posts
>RAM does not equal processing power.

RAM is used to store textures and asset data.

My point still stands.

Show me the 360/PS3 performing twice as well as an 8600gt.....answer is you can't.

Also an 8600gt can run Gears of War at higher settings than the 360.

RyviusARC
So you are comparing a mid 2007 GPU with a summer 2005 GPU.? That is great,with new cards not only card become more powerful they also become more efficient,so is not hard to see one top or close end card been out done by a mid range card 2 years latter. The PS3 has a 7800GTX with half the bandwidth and 256MB of ram,the 8600TG came in 512MB flavors as well as 256MB,and is a series of card more advance than the PS3 GPU,when you find me a game like Uncharted 3 running on a 7800GTX with 256MB of ram then you have a point.
Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#111 tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33793 Posts

[QUOTE="clyde46"][QUOTE="tormentos"] The PS3 is a 2006 console the 360 2005,hell the PS3 would also be 2005 if it wasn't for a blu-ray diode shortage. And considering how much a liar you are i really doubt it..04dcarraher

He's not a liar.

:lol: tormenting tormentos is fun

my pc in 2007 had

Athlon X2 6000 @ 3.2 ghz (200mhz OC)

ASUS M2N motherboard

4gb DDR2 800mhz

500gb harddrive

xfx 8800GT alpha dog edition 512mb.

cost $705

The whole $705 alone explain why the delay on your reply you went component shopping...:lol: When did you buy this so call PC.?
Avatar image for Cranler
Cranler

8809

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#112 Cranler
Member since 2005 • 8809 Posts
[QUOTE="tormentos"][QUOTE="RyviusARC"]>RAM does not equal processing power.

RAM is used to store textures and asset data.

My point still stands.

Show me the 360/PS3 performing twice as well as an 8600gt.....answer is you can't.

Also an 8600gt can run Gears of War at higher settings than the 360.

So you are comparing a mid 2007 GPU with a summer 2005 GPU.? That is great,with new cards not only card become more powerful they also become more efficient,so is not hard to see one top or close end card been out done by a mid range card 2 years latter. The PS3 has a 7800GTX with half the bandwidth and 256MB of ram,the 8600TG came in 512MB flavors as well as 256MB,and is a series of card more advance than the PS3 GPU,when you find me a game like Uncharted 3 running on a 7800GTX with 256MB of ram then you have a point.

What difference does it make how much ram pc versions use? Ram is cheap and most gamers already have plenty enough ram to run any game.
Avatar image for 04dcarraher
04dcarraher

23858

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#113 04dcarraher
Member since 2004 • 23858 Posts

[QUOTE="RyviusARC"]>RAM does not equal processing power.

RAM is used to store textures and asset data.

My point still stands.

Show me the 360/PS3 performing twice as well as an 8600gt.....answer is you can't.

Also an 8600gt can run Gears of War at higher settings than the 360.

tormentos

So you are comparing a mid 2007 GPU with a summer 2005 GPU.? That is great,with new cards not only card become more powerful they also become more efficient,so is not hard to see one top or close end card been out done by a mid range card 2 years latter. The PS3 has a 7800GTX with half the bandwidth and 256MB of ram,the 8600TG came in 512MB flavors as well as 256MB,and is a series of card more advance than the PS3 GPU,when you find me a game like Uncharted 3 running on a 7800GTX with 256MB of ram then you have a point.

your comparing bolts and rocks for brains? a 8600GT is slower then a 7800GTX, and since its a newer card you can get more recent comparisons with games then you will with the old geforce 7's with directx 9. the PS3 has the 7800 chip but its not no GTX half the ROP and memory bandwidth, and the 8600GT has the same bandwidth as the RSX in PS3 does not matter with 256mb version or 512mb version :lol: Also you can find all kinds of games where a weak 8600 performs and look as well as a the HD twins. so give it up I can find all kinds of older games where the 7800gtx blew the PS3 out of the water and plenty of 8600 comparisons

Avatar image for RyviusARC
RyviusARC

5708

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#114 RyviusARC
Member since 2011 • 5708 Posts

[QUOTE="RyviusARC"]>RAM does not equal processing power.

RAM is used to store textures and asset data.

My point still stands.

Show me the 360/PS3 performing twice as well as an 8600gt.....answer is you can't.

Also an 8600gt can run Gears of War at higher settings than the 360.

tormentos

So you are comparing a mid 2007 GPU with a summer 2005 GPU.? That is great,with new cards not only card become more powerful they also become more efficient,so is not hard to see one top or close end card been out done by a mid range card 2 years latter. The PS3 has a 7800GTX with half the bandwidth and 256MB of ram,the 8600TG came in 512MB flavors as well as 256MB,and is a series of card more advance than the PS3 GPU,when you find me a game like Uncharted 3 running on a 7800GTX with 256MB of ram then you have a point.

 

You are using a fallacy.

The 2005 GPUs lacked unified shaders. 

There is nothing like that this gen.

Unified shaders gave a huge boost in performance in shader intensive games.

This can easily be seen when you compare non shader intensive games which most early games this gen were.

If you compared games like F.E.A.R. or Oblivion you will find that the high end GPUs of 2005 were much better.

Once the majority of games became shader intensive you could upgrade to an 8800gt for 200USD and have more than 3x the power of any console.

But my original argument was an 8600gt because the 8600gt was basically a 7600gt with unified shaders.

The 8600gt in power is similar to consoles and yet it performs similar as well which debunks the argument about it taking a twice as powerful PC gpu to match consoles.

Once again you forget RAM does not equal processing power.

RAM is used to store data like textures and assets.

If the card is not powerful enough to process that data it means very little.

The only time RAM will matter is if a game is reaching the limit of RAM and vRAM

Using Uncharted for a comparison is null because Uncharted is not on PC so don't be stupid.

If you compare most multiplats the PC will usually be fine with 256mbs of vRAM at console settings.

You will need a bit more system memory (RAM) because PC stores more data for quicker access but RAM is dirt cheap.

 

Avatar image for 04dcarraher
04dcarraher

23858

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#115 04dcarraher
Member since 2004 • 23858 Posts
[QUOTE="04dcarraher"]

[QUOTE="clyde46"] He's not a liar. tormentos

:lol: tormenting tormentos is fun

my pc in 2007 had

Athlon X2 6000 @ 3.2 ghz (200mhz OC)

ASUS M2N motherboard

4gb DDR2 800mhz

500gb harddrive

xfx 8800GT alpha dog edition 512mb.

cost $705

The whole $705 alone explain why the delay on your reply you went component shopping...:lol: When did you buy this so call PC.?

aww your butt hurt and in denial how sweet
Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#116 tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33793 Posts
[QUOTE="Cranler"] What difference does it make how much ram pc versions use? Ram is cheap and most gamers already have plenty enough ram to run any game.

WTF are you for real.? Now this confirm to me that you people don't know sh** of what your argue.. http://www.anandtech.com/show/6359/the-nvidia-geforce-gtx-650-ti-review/15 This ^^ is what happen see how the 7850 does 83FPS look a little down and you will find another 7850 doing 50FPS. Why the different you may ask.? The 83FPS one has 2GB of ram,the 50FPS one has 1GB,now the difference is not notice across all games,it get notice on a game like Skyrim that eat allot of ram. Imagine how much bigger the different would be when 2 different GPU have a ram disparity,not only the 8600TG is more advance it also has more ram..
Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#117 tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33793 Posts
[QUOTE="04dcarraher"] aww your butt hurt and in denial how sweet

And off he goes running..:lol: When did you buy this PC.?
Avatar image for RyviusARC
RyviusARC

5708

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#118 RyviusARC
Member since 2011 • 5708 Posts

[QUOTE="04dcarraher"]

[QUOTE="clyde46"] He's not a liar. tormentos

:lol: tormenting tormentos is fun

my pc in 2007 had

Athlon X2 6000 @ 3.2 ghz (200mhz OC)

ASUS M2N motherboard

4gb DDR2 800mhz

500gb harddrive

xfx 8800GT alpha dog edition 512mb.

cost $705

The whole $705 alone explain why the delay on your reply you went component shopping...:lol: When did you buy this so call PC.?

 

My 2007 PC build was similar to his and it cost me around 650USD since I used only 2GB of DDR2 800mhz RAM and upgraded to 3GB later for an addition 15USD.

The 8800gt was a briiliant GPU with power almost like the 8800GTX yet I snagged an 8800gt for 200USD.

Avatar image for 04dcarraher
04dcarraher

23858

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#119 04dcarraher
Member since 2004 • 23858 Posts
[QUOTE="tormentos"][QUOTE="04dcarraher"] aww your butt hurt and in denial how sweet

And off he goes running..:lol: When did you buy this PC.?

guess... a 2007 pc well that would fall sometime in 2007 wouldn't it :lol:
Avatar image for SaltyMeatballs
SaltyMeatballs

25165

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#120 SaltyMeatballs
Member since 2009 • 25165 Posts
First I thought he said it would run after "on PC", then I read "THAN PC", mind blown :P
Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#121 tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33793 Posts

[QUOTE="tormentos"][QUOTE="04dcarraher"] :lol: tormenting tormentos is fun

my pc in 2007 had

Athlon X2 6000 @ 3.2 ghz (200mhz OC)

ASUS M2N motherboard

4gb DDR2 800mhz

500gb harddrive

xfx 8800GT alpha dog edition 512mb.

cost $705

RyviusARC

The whole $705 alone explain why the delay on your reply you went component shopping...:lol: When did you buy this so call PC.?

 

My 2007 PC build was similar to his and it cost me around 650USD since I used only 2GB of DDR2 800mhz RAM and upgraded to 3GB later for an addition 15USD.

The 8800gt was a briiliant GPU with power almost like the 8800GTX yet I snagged an 8800gt for 200USD.

When did you buy your PC..
Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#122 tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33793 Posts
[QUOTE="04dcarraher"][QUOTE="tormentos"][QUOTE="04dcarraher"] aww your butt hurt and in denial how sweet

And off he goes running..:lol: When did you buy this PC.?

guess... a 2007 pc well that would fall sometime in 2007 wouldn't it :lol:

And strike 2.:lol: Is a simple question when did you buy your PC.? Waiting.... Waiting... Waiting.... Haha,,,, And 04dcarraher is gone...:lol:
Avatar image for RyviusARC
RyviusARC

5708

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#123 RyviusARC
Member since 2011 • 5708 Posts

[QUOTE="Cranler"] What difference does it make how much ram pc versions use? Ram is cheap and most gamers already have plenty enough ram to run any game. tormentos
WTF are you for real.? Now this confirm to me that you people don't know sh** of what your argue.. http://www.anandtech.com/show/6359/the-nvidia-geforce-gtx-650-ti-review/15 This ^^ is what happen see how the 7850 does 83FPS look a little down and you will find another 7850 doing 50FPS. Why the different you may ask.? The 83FPS one has 2GB of ram,the 50FPS one has 1GB,now the difference is not notice across all games,it get notice on a game like Skyrim that eat allot of ram. Imagine how much bigger the different would be when 2 different GPU have a ram disparity,not only the 8600TG is more advance it also has more ram..

 

Notice how they are using 4xMSAA which eats vRAM and the higher resolution textures also use up a lot of vRAM.

Also notice how the game is running at much higher than 60fps.

If the game was more demanding you wouldn't notice a difference unless the game was using very high resolution textures.

As long as the game is not reaching the limit of vRAM you won't really notice a difference in performance.

There are plenty of benchmarks comparing 2GB cards to 4Gb cards and 

Avatar image for KBFloYd
KBFloYd

22714

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#124 KBFloYd
Member since 2009 • 22714 Posts

it will run faster? as in more than 60FPS?

ps4 120FPS confirmed. thank you sony

images?q=tbn:ANd9GcR58rIt8zcLoKNBGzn7LRV

Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#125 tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33793 Posts
Notice how they are using 4xMSAA which eats vRAM and the higher resolution textures also use up a lot of vRAM.

Also notice how the game is running at much higher than 60fps.

If the game was more demanding you wouldn't notice a difference unless the game was using very high resolution textures.

As long as the game is not reaching the limit of vRAM you won't really notice a difference in performance.

There are plenty of benchmarks comparing 2GB cards to 4Gb cards and 

RyviusARC
Dude you don't get it.? That is my whole point the more ram need it,the more card suffer then they have low ram.. http://www.anandtech.com/show/6359/the-nvidia-geforce-gtx-650-ti-review/15 Did you look at the second screen below .? The 7850 at 1680X1050 same quality both cards perform them same,as soon as you crank that resolution to 1920X1200 the 7850 with 1GB takes a 60 frames hit,while the 7850 with 2GB takes just a 30FPS hit.. Guess what games will not remain static,thy will get bigger they will consume more ram,something like the Titan is future proof for some long years,but most mid range and a little abode like the 7870 and 660,which had 2GB will take a hit a big one when games start asking for 3 or more GB of ram. When did you buy your 2007 PC..
Avatar image for RyviusARC
RyviusARC

5708

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#127 RyviusARC
Member since 2011 • 5708 Posts

[QUOTE="RyviusARC"]

[QUOTE="tormentos"] The whole $705 alone explain why the delay on your reply you went component shopping...:lol: When did you buy this so call PC.?tormentos

 

My 2007 PC build was similar to his and it cost me around 650USD since I used only 2GB of DDR2 800mhz RAM and upgraded to 3GB later for an addition 15USD.

The 8800gt was a briiliant GPU with power almost like the 8800GTX yet I snagged an 8800gt for 200USD.

When did you buy your PC..

 

I bought the parts from various websites.

I remember at the time BFG tech was having a package deal for an 8800gt and 650watt power supply for 250USD together so I went for it.

Basically it was like getting an 8800gt for 190-200USD because the power supply alone sold for 50-60USD.

And I am happy to say both the 8800gt and power supply work just fine even after almost 6 years have gone by.

The CPU I think I got from FRY'S eletronics and since it had been out since late 2006 the price had gone doen considerably.

I also got my motherboard from FRY's electronics since it was bundled together with my CPU, I think I spent 150USD for both, the motherboard was nothing special but it did the job.

The RAM, DVD drive, computer case, and hard drive were all bought from newegg and I don't remember the individual prices at the moment but if I can remember my old account I believe I could find the purchase data.

Avatar image for 04dcarraher
04dcarraher

23858

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#128 04dcarraher
Member since 2004 • 23858 Posts

[QUOTE="04dcarraher"][QUOTE="tormentos"] And off he goes running..:lol: When did you buy this PC.?tormentos
guess... a 2007 pc well that would fall sometime in 2007 wouldn't it :lol:

And strike 2.:lol: Is a simple question when did you buy your PC.? Waiting.... Waiting... Waiting.... Haha,,,,

can be anywhere between october 29th to december 31st of 2007 take a guess

Avatar image for 04dcarraher
04dcarraher

23858

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#129 04dcarraher
Member since 2004 • 23858 Posts

[QUOTE="tormentos"][QUOTE="RyviusARC"]

 

My 2007 PC build was similar to his and it cost me around 650USD since I used only 2GB of DDR2 800mhz RAM and upgraded to 3GB later for an addition 15USD.

The 8800gt was a briiliant GPU with power almost like the 8800GTX yet I snagged an 8800gt for 200USD.

RyviusARC

When did you buy your PC..

 

I bought the parts from various websites.

I remember at the time BFG tech was having a package deal for an 8800gt and 650watt power supply for 250USD together so I went for it.

Basically it was like getting an 8800gt for 190-200USD because the power supply alone sold for 50-60USD.

And I am happy to say both the 8800gt and power supply work just fine even after almost 6 years have gone by.

The CPU I think I got from FRY'S eletronics and since it had been out since late 2006 the price had gone doen considerably.

I also got my motherboard from FRY's electronics since it was bundled together with my CPU, I think I spent 150USD for both, the motherboard was nothing special but it did the job.

The RAM, DVD drive, computer case, and hard drive were all bought from newegg and I don't remember the individual prices at the moment but if I can remember my old account I believe I could find the purchase data.

I bought my parts from tigerdirect and newegg and had to buy my 8800GT from xpcgear since no one else had any in stock at the time.
Avatar image for RyviusARC
RyviusARC

5708

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#130 RyviusARC
Member since 2011 • 5708 Posts

[QUOTE="RyviusARC"]Notice how they are using 4xMSAA which eats vRAM and the higher resolution textures also use up a lot of vRAM.

Also notice how the game is running at much higher than 60fps.

If the game was more demanding you wouldn't notice a difference unless the game was using very high resolution textures.

As long as the game is not reaching the limit of vRAM you won't really notice a difference in performance.

There are plenty of benchmarks comparing 2GB cards to 4Gb cards and 

tormentos

Dude you don't get it.? That is my whole point the more ram need it,the more card suffer then they have low ram.. http://www.anandtech.com/show/6359/the-nvidia-geforce-gtx-650-ti-review/15 Did you look at the second screen below .? The 7850 at 1680X1050 same quality both cards perform them same,as soon as you crank that resolution to 1920X1200 the 7850 with 1GB takes a 60 frames hit,while the 7850 with 2GB takes just a 30FPS hit.. Guess what games will not remain static,thy will get bigger they will consume more ram,something like the Titan is future proof for some long years,but most mid range and a little abode like the 7870 and 660,which had 2GB will take a hit a big one when games start asking for 3 or more GB of ram. When did you buy your 2007 PC..

 

 

Well that will all depend on how much vRAM games will use.

We have no clue how much vRAM will be dedicated to console games so whatever you say will be a guess.

For this gen the jump from 256mb to 512mb was in order to play at higher resolutions and settings compared to consoles.

An 8600gt 256mb will still play games at console settings just fine.

The amount of vRAM used on PC matched closely with the amount used on consoles.

The amount of system memory (RAM) on PC is a lot more though because of what I mentioned before, but RAM is dirt cheap.

My 2007 PC was purchased.............in 2007......

Avatar image for zekere
zekere

2536

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#131 zekere
Member since 2003 • 2536 Posts

I've said it a hundred times, how can a system that starts its own program first and then Windows be fast? It isn't. I press the button on my console and I start playing. I press the button on my PC, go to the toilet, take two beers out of the fridge, check my email on my Iphone, and when I return, I can begin starting my game. Windows is constantly running on the background, as do 40 to 100 other processes while I game.

Avatar image for Cranler
Cranler

8809

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#132 Cranler
Member since 2005 • 8809 Posts
[QUOTE="Cranler"] What difference does it make how much ram pc versions use? Ram is cheap and most gamers already have plenty enough ram to run any game. tormentos
WTF are you for real.? Now this confirm to me that you people don't know sh** of what your argue.. http://www.anandtech.com/show/6359/the-nvidia-geforce-gtx-650-ti-review/15 This ^^ is what happen see how the 7850 does 83FPS look a little down and you will find another 7850 doing 50FPS. Why the different you may ask.? The 83FPS one has 2GB of ram,the 50FPS one has 1GB,now the difference is not notice across all games,it get notice on a game like Skyrim that eat allot of ram. Imagine how much bigger the different would be when 2 different GPU have a ram disparity,not only the 8600TG is more advance it also has more ram..

That cards not designed for 1080p with 4xaa. No one would buy a 1 gb card for anything over 1680x1050. The 2gb version is only $25 more on new egg. Thats not the point anyway. Point is what difference does it make if a pc gpu needs more than 256mb for Uncharted level of graphics?
Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#133 tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33793 Posts
can be anywhere between october 29th to december 31st of 2007 take a guess04dcarraher
:lol: You were looking on the internet for it..:lol: So i was right you are a damn liar and you invented the whole crap.. Is the reason why you refuse to answer,remember how you claim the PS3 was $600 and $500.? Guess what on November 2 2007 the PS4 was $400 dollars...:lol: http://arstechnica.com/gaming/2007/10/sony-confirms-400-40gb-ps3-for-the-us-price-drop-for-80gb/ 5 days after the 8800TG was out..:lol: So basically when you bought your Imaginary $705 dollar PC the PS3 was $300 dollar cheaper than your PC..:lol: That is what you get for lying.
Avatar image for RyviusARC
RyviusARC

5708

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#134 RyviusARC
Member since 2011 • 5708 Posts

[QUOTE="RyviusARC"]

[QUOTE="tormentos"] When did you buy your PC..04dcarraher

 

I bought the parts from various websites.

I remember at the time BFG tech was having a package deal for an 8800gt and 650watt power supply for 250USD together so I went for it.

Basically it was like getting an 8800gt for 190-200USD because the power supply alone sold for 50-60USD.

And I am happy to say both the 8800gt and power supply work just fine even after almost 6 years have gone by.

The CPU I think I got from FRY'S eletronics and since it had been out since late 2006 the price had gone doen considerably.

I also got my motherboard from FRY's electronics since it was bundled together with my CPU, I think I spent 150USD for both, the motherboard was nothing special but it did the job.

The RAM, DVD drive, computer case, and hard drive were all bought from newegg and I don't remember the individual prices at the moment but if I can remember my old account I believe I could find the purchase data.

I bought my parts from tigerdirect and newegg and had to buy my 8800GT from xpcgear since no one else had any in stock at the time.

 

I lucked out on my 8800gt close to it's release in fall 2007 because of the package deal that BFG tech was doing.

They were also doing an SLI package deal but I decided one was enough at the time.

Too bad BFG tech went out of business........my 8800gt and PSU work just fine so it's not much of a biggie.

My friend lucked out before they went out of business he sent in his 8800gtx to get fixed and they gave him a GTX 280 as a replacement.

Avatar image for RyviusARC
RyviusARC

5708

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#135 RyviusARC
Member since 2011 • 5708 Posts

[QUOTE="04dcarraher"] can be anywhere between october 29th to december 31st of 2007 take a guesstormentos
:lol: You were looking on the internet for it..:lol: So i was right you are a damn liar and you invented the whole crap.. Is the reason why you refuse to answer,remember how you claim the PS3 was $600 and $500.? Guess what on November 2 2007 the PS4 was $400 dollars...:lol: http://arstechnica.com/gaming/2007/10/sony-confirms-400-40gb-ps3-for-the-us-price-drop-for-80gb/ 5 days after the 8800TG was out..:lol: So basically when you bought your Imaginary $705 dollar PC the PS3 was $300 dollar cheaper than your PC..:lol: That is what you get for lying.

 

My PC could perform 3x better than consoles so price to performance ratio my PC wins.

Avatar image for Cranler
Cranler

8809

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#136 Cranler
Member since 2005 • 8809 Posts

I've said it a hundred times, how can a system that starts its own program first and then Windows be fast? It isn't. I press the button on my console and I start playing. I press the button on my PC, go to the toilet, take two beers out of the fridge, check my email on my Iphone, and when I return, I can begin starting my game. Windows is constantly running on the background, as do 40 to 100 other processes while I game.

zekere
A pc with an ssd can boot and launch a game faster than any current console. PC's have power saving mode, press a button and you can launch and have game loaded in 5 seconds. Pc will be able to switch games faster than PS 4. With an ssd a pc can quit one game and have another game loaded in a few seconds.
Avatar image for RyviusARC
RyviusARC

5708

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#137 RyviusARC
Member since 2011 • 5708 Posts

I've said it a hundred times, how can a system that starts its own program first and then Windows be fast? It isn't. I press the button on my console and I start playing. I press the button on my PC, go to the toilet, take two beers out of the fridge, check my email on my Iphone, and when I return, I can begin starting my game. Windows is constantly running on the background, as do 40 to 100 other processes while I game.

zekere

 

I always leave my PC on because when idle it uses less energy than some light bulbs.

I have all my games on a hard drive so when I want to play a game I just double click the icon and it's loaded.

I don't need to go find the game then insert the disc.

Also a lot of console games have slow load times while my PC loads much faster.

I can also alt+tab out of a game and type something in this forum then quickly alt+tab back into the game without a hitch.

Avatar image for gamecubepad
gamecubepad

7214

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -12

User Lists: 0

#138 gamecubepad
Member since 2003 • 7214 Posts

Tormentos has really developed into one of the finest trolls on sw. 

Congratz, mate!:lol:

Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#139 tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33793 Posts
[QUOTE="Cranler"] That cards not designed for 1080p with 4xaa. No one would buy a 1 gb card for anything over 1680x1050. The 2gb version is only $25 more on new egg. Thats not the point anyway. Point is what difference does it make if a pc gpu needs more than 256mb for Uncharted level of graphics?

Liar Liar your pants on fire.. http://www.anandtech.com/show/6359/the-nvidia-geforce-gtx-650-ti-review/13 Both card perform the same at higher than 1080p on games like Battlefield 3 and all the other test,it was just Skyrim the big hit because it requires more Ram... The 7850 1GB has not problem with 1080p,the hit was do to ram starvation.. Another argument destroy..
Avatar image for Cranler
Cranler

8809

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#140 Cranler
Member since 2005 • 8809 Posts
[QUOTE="04dcarraher"] can be anywhere between october 29th to december 31st of 2007 take a guesstormentos
:lol: You were looking on the internet for it..:lol: So i was right you are a damn liar and you invented the whole crap.. Is the reason why you refuse to answer,remember how you claim the PS3 was $600 and $500.? Guess what on November 2 2007 the PS4 was $400 dollars...:lol: http://arstechnica.com/gaming/2007/10/sony-confirms-400-40gb-ps3-for-the-us-price-drop-for-80gb/ 5 days after the 8800TG was out..:lol: So basically when you bought your Imaginary $705 dollar PC the PS3 was $300 dollar cheaper than your PC..:lol: That is what you get for lying.

$300 more gets you over 10x hard drive space, double the gpu power and increased functionality.
Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#142 tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33793 Posts

Tormentos has really developed into one of the finest trolls on sw. 

Congratz, mate!:lol:

gamecubepad
WTF..So while i debate with links and try to prove my arguments most of the times with links and info..I am tag as a troll.? But you people who make sh*** arguments and most of the time don't back up sh** are not.? I know it bother some that i find some very good ways to squash some of you people arguments but is sad,trying to tag as a troll some one who try to back his arguments up,and that don't make troll thread like whats worst Cell or GDDR5 moniker.. Or the TEH PC Sucks like other cows do..
Avatar image for AlexKidd5000
AlexKidd5000

3104

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#143 AlexKidd5000
Member since 2005 • 3104 Posts

Every PC gamer must know and admit that it's not the cpu or gpu that makes a performance difference, it's the speed of the RAM. CPUs and GPUs are just there for asthetic purposes.

Mystic-G
Yeah, everyone knows a CPU and GPU are just there to make the motherboard look pretty!
Avatar image for RyviusARC
RyviusARC

5708

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#144 RyviusARC
Member since 2011 • 5708 Posts

[QUOTE="RyviusARC"]

[QUOTE="zekere"]

I've said it a hundred times, how can a system that starts its own program first and then Windows be fast? It isn't. I press the button on my console and I start playing. I press the button on my PC, go to the toilet, take two beers out of the fridge, check my email on my Iphone, and when I return, I can begin starting my game. Windows is constantly running on the background, as do 40 to 100 other processes while I game.

xboxiphoneps3

 

I always leave my PC on because when idle it uses less energy than some light bulbs.

I have all my games on a hard drive so when I want to play a game I just double click the icon and it's loaded.

I don't need to go find the game then insert the disc.

Also a lot of console games have slow load times while my PC loads much faster.

I can also alt+tab out of a game and type something in this forum then quickly alt+tab back into the game without a hitch.

The API overhead, Windows running on a PC, DirectX API's will bog down system performance, no matter if you have a SSD or a quad core processor....there is extremely little to no overhead on consoles and you simply cant compare console hardware/ GPU to its pc counterpart...the console hardware will always outperform a similarily specced PC 100/100 times

 

Not sure why you quoted my posts with something irrelvent to what I was discussing but whatever......I'll bite.

The API overhead mainly affects the CPU than other pieces of hardware.

And the CPU on the PS4 is pretty low in power compared to even the 2011 i5 2500k.

You will find that a simialr powered PC gpu will perform similar to consoles.

For example the 8600gt is similar in power and performs similar to consoles.

The 8600gt is basically a 7600gt with unified shaders.

Avatar image for Cranler
Cranler

8809

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#145 Cranler
Member since 2005 • 8809 Posts
[QUOTE="Cranler"] That cards not designed for 1080p with 4xaa. No one would buy a 1 gb card for anything over 1680x1050. The 2gb version is only $25 more on new egg. Thats not the point anyway. Point is what difference does it make if a pc gpu needs more than 256mb for Uncharted level of graphics? tormentos
Liar Liar your pants on fire.. http://www.anandtech.com/show/6359/the-nvidia-geforce-gtx-650-ti-review/13 Both card perform the same at higher than 1080p on games like Battlefield 3 and all the other test,it was just Skyrim the big hit because it requires more Ram... The 7850 1GB has not problem with 1080p,the hit was do to ram starvation.. Another argument destroy..

Skyrim 1680x1050 perfromance was the same for both cards. Spends $25 more to get 2gb version. Dont see what the big deal is here. First youre arguing that vram is a big difference in performance and now you linking benches that show no difference. PS 4 is quite a mediocre console considering its 2013. Medium end gpu and slow cpu.
Avatar image for RyviusARC
RyviusARC

5708

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#146 RyviusARC
Member since 2011 • 5708 Posts

[QUOTE="Mystic-G"]

Every PC gamer must know and admit that it's not the cpu or gpu that makes a performance difference, it's the speed of the RAM. CPUs and GPUs are just there for asthetic purposes.

AlexKidd5000

Yeah, everyone knows a CPU and GPU are just there to make the motherboard look pretty!

 

Yah I just remove the heatsinks from my CPU and GPU and use them to cook my eggs and bacon so I can have breakfast while playing some games.

Avatar image for Cranler
Cranler

8809

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#148 Cranler
Member since 2005 • 8809 Posts
[QUOTE="AlexKidd5000"][QUOTE="Mystic-G"]

Every PC gamer must know and admit that it's not the cpu or gpu that makes a performance difference, it's the speed of the RAM. CPUs and GPUs are just there for asthetic purposes.

Yeah, everyone knows a CPU and GPU are just there to make the motherboard look pretty!

Its a big conspiracy created by Intel, Nvidia and Amd. We could all be playing gameswith Avatar graphics on $300 ram only pc's if these companies would come clean.
Avatar image for tormentos
tormentos

33793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#149 tormentos
Member since 2003 • 33793 Posts
My PC could perform 3x better than consoles so price to performance ratio my PC wins.RyviusARC
Link..
Avatar image for gamecubepad
gamecubepad

7214

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -12

User Lists: 0

#150 gamecubepad
Member since 2003 • 7214 Posts

WTF..So while i debate with links and try to prove my arguments most of the times with links and info..I am tag as a troll.? tormentos

Oh, don't be coy. Be proud!;)

You make assertions, which are contradicted with evidence. Which you then ignore while you spin off on a different tangent. 

For instance, your 1GB vs 2GB 7850 argument. He clearly said 1GB to 2GB is a jump, but not so much 2GB to 4GB on a card like that at 1080p. He provided proof.

Now you go get the 2GB vs 4GB benchmarks.
 

Then teh optimization. You've been shown the x1950pro that performs better than the hd twins for $200 in 2006. It was easy to beat the hd twins in '06 for $600. Athlon 64 X2 or Pentium D were both at competitive prices back then.

Now you show were x1950pro didn't play the same games at higher settings than the hd twins, even at 1080p.

You back up anything you're saying with actual proof. You can't because PS4 isn't even out.

Like I said...one of the very finest... "Liar, liar!":cry: