yeah...i really don't think many people are buying that one sony.lawlessxDigital Foundry, not Sony.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
yeah...i really don't think many people are buying that one sony.lawlessxDigital Foundry, not Sony.
from what i can gather it doesn't alter the firmware at all, all it is is SONY's secret masterkey, the key to the whole system so to speak.[QUOTE="delta3074"][QUOTE="KiZZo1"]
If the console connects at boot, the firmware is probably checked.
KiZZo1
With unmodified firmware, a lot of other security can be included in it.
The hackers don't need to modify their firmware at all. They now have the "permission" to do whatever they want. Sony can't just simply remove the keys because everything uses the keys, and if you change it then no games/programs will work.But let's just say that Sony found out a way to deal with this. It would have to come in a firmware update and that update must be signed by the keys to work. Hackers could then find a countermeasure to that. How can Sony stop this?
Being a multi-billion dollar company doesn't mean they can do anything, and even if they could there would still be the factor of rather or not it would realistically be worth the investment. Do you really think Sony's going to spend millions of dollars to implement a system that might do nothing more than keep hackers from getting on PSN? How much would Sony really reap from that? It wouldn't do anything to prevent piracy; it would just keep the pirates from playing online.All this " I will believe it when I see itz " or "its BS, Sony u lyin to me " is pretty hilarious. Hearing these stupid comments are obviously showing the true lemming colors. Especially how they can't get the fact that Sony is a multi-billion dollar company. Really now? :?
SwagSurf
[QUOTE="KiZZo1"]
from what i can gather it doesn't alter the firmware at all, all it is is SONY's secret masterkey, the key to the whole system so to speak.delta3074
With unmodified firmware, a lot of other security can be included in it.
The hackers don't need to modify their firmware at all. They now have the "permission" to do whatever they want. Sony can't just simply remove the keys because everything uses the keys, and if you change it then no games/programs will work.But let's just say that Sony found out a way to deal with this. It would have to come in a firmware update and that update must be signed by the keys to work. Hackers could then find a countermeasure to that. How can Sony stop this?
The best Sony can do is ban people from PSN and hope that would be enough of a scare to deter people from hacking.[QUOTE="KiZZo1"]
[QUOTE="delta3074"]from what i can gather it doesn't alter the firmware at all, all it is is SONY's secret masterkey, the key to the whole system so to speak.ZIVX
With unmodified firmware, a lot of other security can be included in it.
The hackers don't need to modify their firmware at all. They now have the "permission" to do whatever they want. Sony can't just simply remove the keys because everything uses the keys, and if you change it then no games/programs will work.But let's just say that Sony found out a way to deal with this. It would have to come in a firmware update and that update must be signed by the keys to work. Hackers could then find a countermeasure to that. How can Sony stop this?
Well Sony really just needs to target new games not old ones, because that's where the profit lies. There's no use in trying to prevent the PS3 from loading what would otherwise be used games. So what if Sony requires additional keys for games released after a certain firmware update?
This falls apart here: including any unauthorized backup manager software" It's not really unauthorized, is it. Furthermore, communication with the servers will only happen with an online connection, disabling any connection at boot-time will further stop this connection - how do you think the airforce managed to keep Linux -. Third thing, disabling/breaking consoles for running custom software may be illegal of Sony, jail-breaking is legal, breaking your system is not. Article has too many holes. themyth01Most people are afraid, because they don't realize that the courts have already ruled that a corporation bricking someone's hardware is illegal. Sure Sony could push their luck and appeal to a higher court, but realistically they probably wouldn't want to do that.
[QUOTE="ZIVX"]
[QUOTE="KiZZo1"]
With unmodified firmware, a lot of other security can be included in it.
The hackers don't need to modify their firmware at all. They now have the "permission" to do whatever they want. Sony can't just simply remove the keys because everything uses the keys, and if you change it then no games/programs will work.But let's just say that Sony found out a way to deal with this. It would have to come in a firmware update and that update must be signed by the keys to work. Hackers could then find a countermeasure to that. How can Sony stop this?
Well Sony really just needs to target new games not old ones, because that's where the profit lies. There's no use in trying to prevent the PS3 from loading used games. So what if Sony requires additional keys for games released after a certain firmware update?
They could do that in theory, I suppose, but it would be a temporary fix. With the master key, it wouldn't take hackers any time at all to obtain any new ones.Actually it would be illegal even if you did, because the EULA isn't strictly speaking legally binding.not true. Its illegal to do that if you never signed for a PSN account.
painguy1
Ironically, this sort of thing probably means Sony will never include features like Other OS in the future.
My honest belief is that very few people are really doing this because of Other OS. I don't necessarily feel Sony was right removing Other OS, but at the same time I believe that most people are simply hiding behind the removal as a convenient excuse to claim their moral high ground.Ironically, this sort of thing probably means Sony will never include features like Other OS in the future.
hakanakumono
This is so fake lol. If you have never connected to PSN/created an account, how do Sony just randomly disconnect the PS3? :?FunconsoleIt doesn't really have to be true to be effective. You're giving a lot of people too much credit for being logical.
I doubt it will happen because of one thing....
Sony isn't good at software and this is all software in the end, I doubt Sony will be capable of doing it let alone keeping up with the Hackers they haven't so far.
Couldn't they do something that bricks the console, but allows it to start working again if you've installed up-to-date official firmware from a flash drive?If in case this is real, sony would only be limited to disabling ps3s that have been hacked and with psn accounts, so that they can brick your console 'legally'. lol
PSdual_wielder
Sony could always go the same way of so many other security software companies and hire the very people that pose a threat to them. If Sony could get a few of these hackers to work with them, they might be able to do something.I doubt it will happen because of one thing....
Sony isn't good at software and this is all software in the end, I doubt Sony will be capable of doing it let alone keeping up with the Hackers they haven't so far.WilliamRLBaker
If in case this is real, sony would only be limited to disabling ps3s that have been hacked and with psn accounts, so that they can brick your console 'legally'. lol
Couldn't they do something that bricks the console, but allows it to start working again if you've installed up-to-date official firmware from a flash drive? I don't know for sure, to be honest. The law as it stands is that hardware manufacturers can't brick units - just disallow network access. And besides, such a method would be pointless; any up-to-date official firmware isn't going to fix the issue. Hackers probably won't even care about having to update the firmware, because it won't stop them.Lets assume this is true and sony does disable the console. Guess what happens? They get sued. Contrary to popular belief EULA=/=law and they WILL get slammed with a lawsuit along with setting some nice EULA precedents on hardware.
They wouldn't be setting any precedent. Apple already set that precedent.Lets assume this is true and sony does disable the console. Guess what happens? They get sued. Contrary to popular belief EULA=/=law and they WILL get slammed with a lawsuit along with setting some nice EULA precedents on hardware.
Whiteblade999
[QUOTE="Whiteblade999"]They wouldn't be setting any precedent. Apple already set that precedent.Lets assume this is true and sony does disable the console. Guess what happens? They get sued. Contrary to popular belief EULA=/=law and they WILL get slammed with a lawsuit along with setting some nice EULA precedents on hardware.
jalexbrown
Mind linking to the case? I've heard precedents for software EULA but never for hardware.
[QUOTE="jalexbrown"][QUOTE="Whiteblade999"]
Lets assume this is true and sony does disable the console. Guess what happens? They get sued. Contrary to popular belief EULA=/=law and they WILL get slammed with a lawsuit along with setting some nice EULA precedents on hardware.
They wouldn't be setting any precedent. Apple already set that precedent.Mind linking to the case? I've heard precedents for software EULA but never for hardware.
I'm trying to find it; I read about it maybe a month back. If I find the link, I'll edit this post with it.[QUOTE="pppjjj"]Microsoft has done it.. in the millions as well.This is clearly a scare tactics move that Sony is using against hackers.
Easyle
MS has only disabled the online functions and they tried to disable the harddrive as well. But that backfired and they got sued for it and they had to remove that.
Har Har Har
Theres nothing that sony can do. If they brick consoles they will be sued, if they make some new firmware software updates people will revert to earlier 'firmware' software.
The best they can do is ban people with modded consoles from use of the internet, and that's provided that the console is not as compromised as the coders claim it to be.
[QUOTE="tagyhag"]Sony PR.RogueShodownDo you read?
Lol, no just no. I will believe it when I see it.SaltyMeatballsIt's just the TC that says Sony "destroys" piracy. The article on joystiq was merely pointing out that Sony can possibly ban consoles without a PSN account. I put "destroys" because it grabbed peoples attention. It grabbed yours right?
Har Har Har
Theres nothing that sony can do. If they brick consoles they will be sued, if they make some new firmware software updates people will revert to earlier 'firmware' software.
The best they can do is ban people with modded consoles from use of the internet, and that's provided that the console is not as compromised as the coders claim it to be.
htekemerald
[QUOTE="htekemerald"]
Har Har Har
Theres nothing that sony can do. If they brick consoles they will be sued, if they make some new firmware software updates people will revert to earlier 'firmware' software.
The best they can do is ban people with modded consoles from use of the internet, and that's provided that the console is not as compromised as the coders claim it to be.
jhcho2
[QUOTE="htekemerald"]
Har Har Har
Theres nothing that sony can do. If they brick consoles they will be sued, if they make some new firmware software updates people will revert to earlier 'firmware' software.
The best they can do is ban people with modded consoles from use of the internet, and that's provided that the console is not as compromised as the coders claim it to be.
jhcho2
http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/11/sony-sues-geohot-fail0verflow-over-ps3-exploits/
this is how sony will stop it lol...or they hope
I don't think it's legal for sony to do thisohthemanateeIt probably perfectly legal for Sony to ban a console ID or PSN ID from it's networks. It's probably illegal to actually render the console unusable.
It should be noted that a banning from PSN also disables access to downloaded content, if what I'm reading on gaf is correct.
Lol, no just no. I will believe it when I see it.SaltyMeatballsIt's just the TC that says Sony "destroys" piracy. The article on joystiq was merely pointing out that Sony can possibly ban consoles without a PSN account. I put "destroys" because it grabbed peoples attention. It grabbed yours right? Title is still wrong, since it doesn't actually destroy anything.
Let's get some things clear:
According to the article cited by the OP, Sony collects information from every PS3 that connects to the network. The kind of information it collects is basic housekeeping information, the kind that any entity in its position would reasonably collect. System information, error logs, that sort of thing. No doubt Microsoft, Nintendo and Valve collect similar information from their users' machines. The article postulates that Sony could use the information it has collected to determine whether a given PS3 has been tampered with. The article further postulates that, based on its determination, Sony could remotely disable PS3s.
However, and crucially, the article does not say Sony has the technological capability to remotely disable PS3s, merely that it has the legal authority to do so. This is a key distinction, one that could significantly weaken the impact of any action Sony might take. Obviously, since Sony has given itself the authority to disable your PS3 remotely, it isan understandableassumption that it does have that capability. But the OP's cited article does not make that assumption, and given Sony's security track record, I don't think it is a safe assumption to make either, especially considering the possible legal and PR ramifications if Sony were ever to exercise that capability--no legal agreement trumps the First Sale doctrine, and it isn't hard to imagine a plaintiff successfully arguing that Sony being able to remotely disable PS3s violates that doctrine.
So I'm going to go with the belief that, while Sony may be able to ban tampered PS3s from PSN, it can't reach in and completely disable them.
[QUOTE="jhcho2"]
[QUOTE="htekemerald"]
Har Har Har
Theres nothing that sony can do. If they brick consoles they will be sued, if they make some new firmware software updates people will revert to earlier 'firmware' software.
The best they can do is ban people with modded consoles from use of the internet, and that's provided that the console is not as compromised as the coders claim it to be.
jalexbrown
Yes, the reason being that owners of modded consoles stopped looking for ways to get onto Xbox Live....because it isn't worth it.
It probably perfectly legal for Sony to ban a console ID or PSN ID from it's networks. It's probably illegal to actually render the console unusable.[QUOTE="ohthemanatee"]I don't think it's legal for sony to do thisshinrabanshou
It should be noted that a banning from PSN also disables access to downloaded content, if what I'm reading on gaf is correct.
Microsoft banned modded xboxes from Live, and caused the profile to become corrupted so it coudlnt be transferred to another console for use, as well as disabled install to hard drive feature. Of those features, they were forced legally to undo the removal of the install to HDD feature. This means that removing features is not allowed, banning the console is allowed, and preventing spread of their profile is also allowed, but blockign the profile from loading is not allowed. There really is a lot of red tape that surrounds these types of issues, and Sony will most likely be wrapped up in a similar bar of tape. In other words, sony can ban you from their service, but they can not cripple your hardware purchase by crippling the software running on it as it was advertised to do so. They legally can't.Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment