Joystiq : Sony DESTROYS any hope of Jailbreaking/Pirating on PS3.

  • 142 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for DroidPhysX
DroidPhysX

17098

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#101 DroidPhysX
Member since 2010 • 17098 Posts

yeah...i really don't think many people are buying that one sony.lawlessx
Digital Foundry, not Sony.

Avatar image for ZIVX
ZIVX

2981

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#102 ZIVX
Member since 2008 • 2981 Posts

[QUOTE="delta3074"][QUOTE="KiZZo1"]

If the console connects at boot, the firmware is probably checked.

KiZZo1

from what i can gather it doesn't alter the firmware at all, all it is is SONY's secret masterkey, the key to the whole system so to speak.

With unmodified firmware, a lot of other security can be included in it.

The hackers don't need to modify their firmware at all. They now have the "permission" to do whatever they want. Sony can't just simply remove the keys because everything uses the keys, and if you change it then no games/programs will work.

But let's just say that Sony found out a way to deal with this. It would have to come in a firmware update and that update must be signed by the keys to work. Hackers could then find a countermeasure to that. How can Sony stop this?

Avatar image for jalexbrown
jalexbrown

11432

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#103 jalexbrown
Member since 2006 • 11432 Posts

All this " I will believe it when I see itz " or "its BS, Sony u lyin to me " is pretty hilarious. Hearing these stupid comments are obviously showing the true lemming colors. Especially how they can't get the fact that Sony is a multi-billion dollar company. Really now? :?

SwagSurf
Being a multi-billion dollar company doesn't mean they can do anything, and even if they could there would still be the factor of rather or not it would realistically be worth the investment. Do you really think Sony's going to spend millions of dollars to implement a system that might do nothing more than keep hackers from getting on PSN? How much would Sony really reap from that? It wouldn't do anything to prevent piracy; it would just keep the pirates from playing online.
Avatar image for themyth01
themyth01

13924

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#104 themyth01
Member since 2003 • 13924 Posts
This falls apart here: including any unauthorized backup manager software" It's not really unauthorized, is it. Furthermore, communication with the servers will only happen with an online connection, disabling any connection at boot-time will further stop this connection - how do you think the airforce managed to keep Linux -. Third thing, disabling/breaking consoles for running custom software may be illegal of Sony, jail-breaking is legal, breaking your system is not. Article has too many holes.
Avatar image for jalexbrown
jalexbrown

11432

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#105 jalexbrown
Member since 2006 • 11432 Posts
[QUOTE="ZIVX"]

[QUOTE="KiZZo1"]

from what i can gather it doesn't alter the firmware at all, all it is is SONY's secret masterkey, the key to the whole system so to speak.delta3074

With unmodified firmware, a lot of other security can be included in it.

The hackers don't need to modify their firmware at all. They now have the "permission" to do whatever they want. Sony can't just simply remove the keys because everything uses the keys, and if you change it then no games/programs will work.

But let's just say that Sony found out a way to deal with this. It would have to come in a firmware update and that update must be signed by the keys to work. Hackers could then find a countermeasure to that. How can Sony stop this?

The best Sony can do is ban people from PSN and hope that would be enough of a scare to deter people from hacking.
Avatar image for hakanakumono
hakanakumono

27455

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#106 hakanakumono
Member since 2008 • 27455 Posts

[QUOTE="KiZZo1"]

[QUOTE="delta3074"]from what i can gather it doesn't alter the firmware at all, all it is is SONY's secret masterkey, the key to the whole system so to speak.ZIVX

With unmodified firmware, a lot of other security can be included in it.

The hackers don't need to modify their firmware at all. They now have the "permission" to do whatever they want. Sony can't just simply remove the keys because everything uses the keys, and if you change it then no games/programs will work.

But let's just say that Sony found out a way to deal with this. It would have to come in a firmware update and that update must be signed by the keys to work. Hackers could then find a countermeasure to that. How can Sony stop this?

Well Sony really just needs to target new games not old ones, because that's where the profit lies. There's no use in trying to prevent the PS3 from loading what would otherwise be used games. So what if Sony requires additional keys for games released after a certain firmware update?

Avatar image for jalexbrown
jalexbrown

11432

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#107 jalexbrown
Member since 2006 • 11432 Posts
This falls apart here: including any unauthorized backup manager software" It's not really unauthorized, is it. Furthermore, communication with the servers will only happen with an online connection, disabling any connection at boot-time will further stop this connection - how do you think the airforce managed to keep Linux -. Third thing, disabling/breaking consoles for running custom software may be illegal of Sony, jail-breaking is legal, breaking your system is not. Article has too many holes. themyth01
Most people are afraid, because they don't realize that the courts have already ruled that a corporation bricking someone's hardware is illegal. Sure Sony could push their luck and appeal to a higher court, but realistically they probably wouldn't want to do that.
Avatar image for jalexbrown
jalexbrown

11432

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#108 jalexbrown
Member since 2006 • 11432 Posts
[QUOTE="hakanakumono"]

[QUOTE="ZIVX"]

[QUOTE="KiZZo1"]

With unmodified firmware, a lot of other security can be included in it.

The hackers don't need to modify their firmware at all. They now have the "permission" to do whatever they want. Sony can't just simply remove the keys because everything uses the keys, and if you change it then no games/programs will work.

But let's just say that Sony found out a way to deal with this. It would have to come in a firmware update and that update must be signed by the keys to work. Hackers could then find a countermeasure to that. How can Sony stop this?

Well Sony really just needs to target new games not old ones, because that's where the profit lies. There's no use in trying to prevent the PS3 from loading used games. So what if Sony requires additional keys for games released after a certain firmware update?

They could do that in theory, I suppose, but it would be a temporary fix. With the master key, it wouldn't take hackers any time at all to obtain any new ones.
Avatar image for painguy1
painguy1

8686

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#109 painguy1
Member since 2007 • 8686 Posts

not true. Its illegal to do that if you never signed for a PSN account.

Avatar image for jalexbrown
jalexbrown

11432

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#110 jalexbrown
Member since 2006 • 11432 Posts

not true. Its illegal to do that if you never signed for a PSN account.

painguy1
Actually it would be illegal even if you did, because the EULA isn't strictly speaking legally binding.
Avatar image for hakanakumono
hakanakumono

27455

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#111 hakanakumono
Member since 2008 • 27455 Posts

Ironically, this sort of thing probably means Sony will never include features like Other OS in the future.

Avatar image for jalexbrown
jalexbrown

11432

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#112 jalexbrown
Member since 2006 • 11432 Posts

Ironically, this sort of thing probably means Sony will never include features like Other OS in the future.

hakanakumono
My honest belief is that very few people are really doing this because of Other OS. I don't necessarily feel Sony was right removing Other OS, but at the same time I believe that most people are simply hiding behind the removal as a convenient excuse to claim their moral high ground.
Avatar image for themyth01
themyth01

13924

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#113 themyth01
Member since 2003 • 13924 Posts

Ironically, this sort of thing probably means Sony will never include features like Other OS in the future.

hakanakumono

OtherOS wasn't just something to brag about, Sony could consider the PS3 as a computer getting some generous tax breaks in EU.

Avatar image for djsifer01
djsifer01

7238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#114 djsifer01
Member since 2005 • 7238 Posts
I hope its true. Im not going to worry about it since i would never steal a game anyways.
Avatar image for Funconsole
Funconsole

3223

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#115 Funconsole
Member since 2009 • 3223 Posts
This is so fake lol. If you have never connected to PSN/created an account, how do Sony just randomly disconnect the PS3? :?
Avatar image for jalexbrown
jalexbrown

11432

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#116 jalexbrown
Member since 2006 • 11432 Posts
This is so fake lol. If you have never connected to PSN/created an account, how do Sony just randomly disconnect the PS3? :?Funconsole
It doesn't really have to be true to be effective. You're giving a lot of people too much credit for being logical.
Avatar image for WilliamRLBaker
WilliamRLBaker

28915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#117 WilliamRLBaker
Member since 2006 • 28915 Posts

I doubt it will happen because of one thing....

Sony isn't good at software and this is all software in the end, I doubt Sony will be capable of doing it let alone keeping up with the Hackers they haven't so far.

Avatar image for shani_boy101
shani_boy101

5423

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#118 shani_boy101
Member since 2006 • 5423 Posts

If in case this is real, sony would only be limited to disabling ps3s that have been hacked and with psn accounts, so that they can brick your console 'legally'. lol

PSdual_wielder
Couldn't they do something that bricks the console, but allows it to start working again if you've installed up-to-date official firmware from a flash drive?
Avatar image for jalexbrown
jalexbrown

11432

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#119 jalexbrown
Member since 2006 • 11432 Posts

I doubt it will happen because of one thing....

Sony isn't good at software and this is all software in the end, I doubt Sony will be capable of doing it let alone keeping up with the Hackers they haven't so far.

WilliamRLBaker

Sony could always go the same way of so many other security software companies and hire the very people that pose a threat to them. If Sony could get a few of these hackers to work with them, they might be able to do something.

Avatar image for jalexbrown
jalexbrown

11432

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#120 jalexbrown
Member since 2006 • 11432 Posts
[QUOTE="shani_boy101"][QUOTE="PSdual_wielder"]

If in case this is real, sony would only be limited to disabling ps3s that have been hacked and with psn accounts, so that they can brick your console 'legally'. lol

Couldn't they do something that bricks the console, but allows it to start working again if you've installed up-to-date official firmware from a flash drive?

I don't know for sure, to be honest. The law as it stands is that hardware manufacturers can't brick units - just disallow network access. And besides, such a method would be pointless; any up-to-date official firmware isn't going to fix the issue. Hackers probably won't even care about having to update the firmware, because it won't stop them.
Avatar image for deactivated-6243ee9902175
deactivated-6243ee9902175

5847

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#121 deactivated-6243ee9902175
Member since 2007 • 5847 Posts

Lets assume this is true and sony does disable the console. Guess what happens? They get sued. Contrary to popular belief EULA=/=law and they WILL get slammed with a lawsuit along with setting some nice EULA precedents on hardware.

Avatar image for jalexbrown
jalexbrown

11432

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#122 jalexbrown
Member since 2006 • 11432 Posts

Lets assume this is true and sony does disable the console. Guess what happens? They get sued. Contrary to popular belief EULA=/=law and they WILL get slammed with a lawsuit along with setting some nice EULA precedents on hardware.

Whiteblade999
They wouldn't be setting any precedent. Apple already set that precedent.
Avatar image for deactivated-6243ee9902175
deactivated-6243ee9902175

5847

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#123 deactivated-6243ee9902175
Member since 2007 • 5847 Posts

[QUOTE="Whiteblade999"]

Lets assume this is true and sony does disable the console. Guess what happens? They get sued. Contrary to popular belief EULA=/=law and they WILL get slammed with a lawsuit along with setting some nice EULA precedents on hardware.

jalexbrown

They wouldn't be setting any precedent. Apple already set that precedent.

Mind linking to the case? I've heard precedents for software EULA but never for hardware.

Avatar image for coolbeans90
coolbeans90

21305

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#124 coolbeans90
Member since 2009 • 21305 Posts

I cannot imagine anything else their PR department would say. Damage control is their job.

Avatar image for jalexbrown
jalexbrown

11432

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#125 jalexbrown
Member since 2006 • 11432 Posts
[QUOTE="Whiteblade999"]

[QUOTE="jalexbrown"][QUOTE="Whiteblade999"]

Lets assume this is true and sony does disable the console. Guess what happens? They get sued. Contrary to popular belief EULA=/=law and they WILL get slammed with a lawsuit along with setting some nice EULA precedents on hardware.

They wouldn't be setting any precedent. Apple already set that precedent.

Mind linking to the case? I've heard precedents for software EULA but never for hardware.

I'm trying to find it; I read about it maybe a month back. If I find the link, I'll edit this post with it.
Avatar image for ohthemanatee
ohthemanatee

8104

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#126 ohthemanatee
Member since 2010 • 8104 Posts
I don't think it's legal for sony to do this
Avatar image for kaealy
kaealy

2179

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#127 kaealy
Member since 2004 • 2179 Posts

[QUOTE="pppjjj"]

This is clearly a scare tactics move that Sony is using against hackers.

Easyle

Microsoft has done it.. in the millions as well.

MS has only disabled the online functions and they tried to disable the harddrive as well. But that backfired and they got sued for it and they had to remove that.

Avatar image for htekemerald
htekemerald

7325

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#128 htekemerald
Member since 2004 • 7325 Posts

Har Har Har

Theres nothing that sony can do. If they brick consoles they will be sued, if they make some new firmware software updates people will revert to earlier 'firmware' software.

The best they can do is ban people with modded consoles from use of the internet, and that's provided that the console is not as compromised as the coders claim it to be.

Avatar image for Easyle
Easyle

2034

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#129 Easyle
Member since 2010 • 2034 Posts
[QUOTE="tagyhag"]Sony PR.RogueShodown
Do you read?
Lol, no just no. I will believe it when I see it.SaltyMeatballs
It's just the TC that says Sony "destroys" piracy. The article on joystiq was merely pointing out that Sony can possibly ban consoles without a PSN account.

I put "destroys" because it grabbed peoples attention. It grabbed yours right?
Avatar image for jhcho2
jhcho2

5103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 2

#130 jhcho2
Member since 2004 • 5103 Posts

Har Har Har

Theres nothing that sony can do. If they brick consoles they will be sued, if they make some new firmware software updates people will revert to earlier 'firmware' software.

The best they can do is ban people with modded consoles from use of the internet, and that's provided that the console is not as compromised as the coders claim it to be.

htekemerald


You do realize that Microsoft did brick modded consoles back in the day....

Avatar image for i5750at4Ghz
i5750at4Ghz

5839

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#131 i5750at4Ghz
Member since 2010 • 5839 Posts

[QUOTE="htekemerald"]

Har Har Har

Theres nothing that sony can do. If they brick consoles they will be sued, if they make some new firmware software updates people will revert to earlier 'firmware' software.

The best they can do is ban people with modded consoles from use of the internet, and that's provided that the console is not as compromised as the coders claim it to be.

jhcho2


You do realize that Microsoft did brick modded consoles back in the day....

No they didn't. And if they did there would have been a major lawsuit to follow. However banning hackers from online play seems normal. Although they usally just find a way around it.

Avatar image for jalexbrown
jalexbrown

11432

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#132 jalexbrown
Member since 2006 • 11432 Posts

[QUOTE="htekemerald"]

Har Har Har

Theres nothing that sony can do. If they brick consoles they will be sued, if they make some new firmware software updates people will revert to earlier 'firmware' software.

The best they can do is ban people with modded consoles from use of the internet, and that's provided that the console is not as compromised as the coders claim it to be.

jhcho2


You do realize that Microsoft did brick modded consoles back in the day....

Key words: "back in the day". There's a reason they don't continue this practice.

Avatar image for gamer-adam1
gamer-adam1

4188

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#133 gamer-adam1
Member since 2008 • 4188 Posts

http://www.engadget.com/2011/01/11/sony-sues-geohot-fail0verflow-over-ps3-exploits/

this is how sony will stop it lol...or they hope

Avatar image for HailCaesarHail
HailCaesarHail

814

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#134 HailCaesarHail
Member since 2010 • 814 Posts
i hope sony is able to do this, this thieves need to be brought in.
Avatar image for shinrabanshou
shinrabanshou

8458

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#135 shinrabanshou
Member since 2009 • 8458 Posts

I don't think it's legal for sony to do thisohthemanatee
It probably perfectly legal for Sony to ban a console ID or PSN ID from it's networks. It's probably illegal to actually render the console unusable.

It should be noted that a banning from PSN also disables access to downloaded content, if what I'm reading on gaf is correct.

Avatar image for sinpkr
sinpkr

1255

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#136 sinpkr
Member since 2010 • 1255 Posts

seems like a bunch of empty threats too me.

Avatar image for themyth01
themyth01

13924

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#137 themyth01
Member since 2003 • 13924 Posts
[QUOTE="Easyle"][QUOTE="RogueShodown"][QUOTE="tagyhag"] Do you read?
Lol, no just no. I will believe it when I see it.SaltyMeatballs
It's just the TC that says Sony "destroys" piracy. The article on joystiq was merely pointing out that Sony can possibly ban consoles without a PSN account.

I put "destroys" because it grabbed peoples attention. It grabbed yours right?

Title is still wrong, since it doesn't actually destroy anything.
Avatar image for UnnDunn
UnnDunn

3981

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#138 UnnDunn
Member since 2002 • 3981 Posts

Let's get some things clear:

According to the article cited by the OP, Sony collects information from every PS3 that connects to the network. The kind of information it collects is basic housekeeping information, the kind that any entity in its position would reasonably collect. System information, error logs, that sort of thing. No doubt Microsoft, Nintendo and Valve collect similar information from their users' machines. The article postulates that Sony could use the information it has collected to determine whether a given PS3 has been tampered with. The article further postulates that, based on its determination, Sony could remotely disable PS3s.

However, and crucially, the article does not say Sony has the technological capability to remotely disable PS3s, merely that it has the legal authority to do so. This is a key distinction, one that could significantly weaken the impact of any action Sony might take. Obviously, since Sony has given itself the authority to disable your PS3 remotely, it isan understandableassumption that it does have that capability. But the OP's cited article does not make that assumption, and given Sony's security track record, I don't think it is a safe assumption to make either, especially considering the possible legal and PR ramifications if Sony were ever to exercise that capability--no legal agreement trumps the First Sale doctrine, and it isn't hard to imagine a plaintiff successfully arguing that Sony being able to remotely disable PS3s violates that doctrine.

So I'm going to go with the belief that, while Sony may be able to ban tampered PS3s from PSN, it can't reach in and completely disable them.

Avatar image for jhcho2
jhcho2

5103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 2

#139 jhcho2
Member since 2004 • 5103 Posts

[QUOTE="jhcho2"]

[QUOTE="htekemerald"]

Har Har Har

Theres nothing that sony can do. If they brick consoles they will be sued, if they make some new firmware software updates people will revert to earlier 'firmware' software.

The best they can do is ban people with modded consoles from use of the internet, and that's provided that the console is not as compromised as the coders claim it to be.

jalexbrown


You do realize that Microsoft did brick modded consoles back in the day....

Key words: "back in the day". There's a reason they don't continue this practice.

Yes, the reason being that owners of modded consoles stopped looking for ways to get onto Xbox Live....because it isn't worth it.

Avatar image for Phazevariance
Phazevariance

12356

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#140 Phazevariance
Member since 2003 • 12356 Posts

[QUOTE="ohthemanatee"]I don't think it's legal for sony to do thisshinrabanshou

It probably perfectly legal for Sony to ban a console ID or PSN ID from it's networks. It's probably illegal to actually render the console unusable.

It should be noted that a banning from PSN also disables access to downloaded content, if what I'm reading on gaf is correct.

Microsoft banned modded xboxes from Live, and caused the profile to become corrupted so it coudlnt be transferred to another console for use, as well as disabled install to hard drive feature. Of those features, they were forced legally to undo the removal of the install to HDD feature. This means that removing features is not allowed, banning the console is allowed, and preventing spread of their profile is also allowed, but blockign the profile from loading is not allowed. There really is a lot of red tape that surrounds these types of issues, and Sony will most likely be wrapped up in a similar bar of tape. In other words, sony can ban you from their service, but they can not cripple your hardware purchase by crippling the software running on it as it was advertised to do so. They legally can't.
Avatar image for Wisely321
Wisely321

686

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#141 Wisely321
Member since 2008 • 686 Posts
California courts have already ruled that it's illegal for a corporation to brick a unit for being jailbroken. Even if this was by some chance true (I'm skeptical), I doubt Sony would really get far pushing the courts.jalexbrown
what if its outside us?
Avatar image for Twin-Blade
Twin-Blade

6806

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#142 Twin-Blade
Member since 2005 • 6806 Posts

I hope it's true.