[QUOTE="numba1234"][QUOTE="ironcreed"][QUOTE="numba1234"][QUOTE="ironcreed"] Screens of a finished game vs. screens of an unfinished game FTL. Why would one even try to debate this is beyond me. Then again, some individuals think nothing of trying to stoop so ridiculously (albeit amusingly) low in their vain attempt at trying to discredit a particular game.
A futile comparison at best regardless though, as Fable 2, even in it's unfinished state looks better than the shiny, over-bloomed plastic graphics of Kameo. All one needs to do is look at the superior lighting and notice that there is no ridiculously over done, spit shine, plastic looking bloom in order to hide textures in the available Fable 2 footage and the contest is over. All other arguing from that point is merely differing opinions on which artstyle is the best, lol. And that of course is in the eye of the beholder.
ironcreed
Why would someone do this. Because people are saying this is the best looking game. I personally think that when someone says that, it really comes down to them (knowingly or unknowingly) just prefering the artstyle. All technical talk aside, maybe some people think that it is the most impressive still in development game on the horizon because they just happen to like the looks of it personally.
Now, speaking for myself, I do not think that it is the "best looking game" on the horizon, lol. But I will say that I think from a strictly artistic standpoint, one would certainly have a very good argument for "best looking game" from what little we have seen. Of course this is again....in the eye of the beholder.
In any event, trying to compare an unfinished game graphically to a finished one is an epic fail anyway in my book.
Huh? Techinically or graphically-I don't care psn games blow this game graphically. I never hear about fable 2 game at neogaf(rightfully so) about the graphics. Only here there is this beelief that fable 2 graphics are amazing. Anyway, wipeout hd is probably near the same stage as fable 2 is. And looks about twice, to three times as good.
This baby was all the talk, at a graphic stand point.
Nice, still ignoring one fine little detail....Fable 2 is still in development. And if you know anything about developing games, you would know that most of the graphical polish is done last. And as far as UNFINISHED GAMES go....Fable 2 is looking beautiful considering the art****it is using. You say the lighting is the same in all next gen games? LMAO....whatever you say. I guess next you will tell me there is no difference in how the lighting is used, right?
This game is in development too. And lighting is the same in every game. There is a certain point where you put the light source. Real next gen light is having multiple different light points, ala crysis, and ala killzone 2. My god, since source engine, they used volumetric lighting. I'm trying to tell people that volumetric lighting is weak. It isn't impressive. Lost planet had volumetric lighting, is that game teh most techinal game made? Try telling me a next gen game that doesn't use light the same way as fable 2 uses light. I'm still waiting for some people to just read what volumetric lighting is.
Log in to comment