KillZone 2 Discussion thread

If your going to post pics of gears at least post some some that ACTUALLY resemble what the game looks like...

Killzone still has along way to go to beat gears.

BLAUcopter

Just keep telling yourself that over and over again maybe you will start believeing it!

Let us make a memorial for Halo LOL.

bad82man82

[QUOTE="Spartanx23"][QUOTE="Bread_or_Decide"]

Sony came through what else is their to say?

Let the damage control continue!!

Kalias

So coming through these days means put up the same trailer as 2 years ago, but with the heaviest of downgrades.:|

No.

Coming through is Bungie, who showed the world how to put together a trailer with class!

i really want to believe that single player for halo 3 was going to at least look amazing (10x better then multi) but i was wrong. compeletly wrong.

Killzone Just owned every FPS out there in graphics. even on pc, because so far crysis is only graphics nothing close to the scope and lighting of killzone (killzone taking place in a dark atmosphere has the best lighting to date)

How? By using blur as an art style. Killzone didn't own anything. It certainly didn't own Call of Duty 4, let alone Halo 3.

[QUOTE="TekkenMaster606"][QUOTE="BLAUcopter"]If your going to post pics of gears at least post some some that ACTUALLY resemble what the game looks like...

Killzone still has along way to go to beat gears

BLAUcopter

Want to see what my digital camera can make Twilight Princess look like? Srsly. Bring us framebuffer shots.

ahhh poor fan boys.

Wow, is that the best you could come up with? Pathetic. Posters with 10x more dignity, intelligence, and respect around here have called me worse.

A digital camera shot from your flat panel is going to make anything look godly. Everyone knows that.

Supposedly the first level which took 15 mins to complete was a whopping 2 gigs. They basically said the games huge enviroment is one reason why Blu-Ray is needed. After seeing Gears Of War being 9 hrs long, they might actually have a point.

Either way the trailer was impressive and anyone denying this is a fanboy......not a lem or sheep, a fanboy. Honestly I hope this game can sale the console because Sony needs all the help they can get. With MS hardware woes maybe this is what Sony needed to put them over the hump.

[QUOTE="BLAUcopter"]If your going to post pics of gears at least post some some that ACTUALLY resemble what the game looks like...

Killzone still has along way to go to beat gears.

TekkenMaster606

Want to see what my digital camera can make Twilight Princess look like? Srsly. Bring us framebuffer shots.

[QUOTE="Kalias"][QUOTE="Spartanx23"][QUOTE="Bread_or_Decide"]

Sony came through what else is their to say?

Let the damage control continue!!

Spartanx23

So coming through these days means put up the same trailer as 2 years ago, but with the heaviest of downgrades.:|

No.

Coming through is Bungie, who showed the world how to put together a trailer with class!

i really want to believe that single player for halo 3 was going to at least look amazing (10x better then multi) but i was wrong. compeletly wrong.

Killzone Just owned every FPS out there in graphics. even on pc, because so far crysis is only graphics nothing close to the scope and lighting of killzone (killzone taking place in a dark atmosphere has the best lighting to date)

How? By using blur as an art style. Killzone didn't own anything. It certainly didn't own Call of Duty 4, let alone Halo 3.

you know what? i dont care WHAT they used. I only care about what i see. and what I SAW was history in the making. Halo R.I.P

There has been a tradeoff this generation people. Last time, PS2 owners wanted shooters like the Xbox got. And Xbox fans wanted JRPGs.

The Playstation 3 has plenty of shooters coming up and the Xbox 360 has it's fair share of JRPGs.

[QUOTE="Zeliard9"]

[QUOTE="IbukiNinja"]Just laugh at the people who bring in the E3 05 argument...We all knew it was CGI yet you want the game to look like it? Come on...The game is very close to looking like the CGI trailer and that was the goal.IbukiNinja

Sony deserved everything it got at E3 05. They said the CGI movie was in-game footage, which was a flat-out lie, since it was pre-rendered. They could've said "expect the final game to look like this in-game", if that was the goal, and they wouldn't have gotten the criticism they did. It's because they literally said that the video was in-game footage, and it wasn't.

So now you know the E3 05 was CGI, why are you still trying to hold Killzone 2 to that standard? This makes no sense to me...

2005 (stop saying it is CGI )

2007 ( pre-alpha, mind blowing )

You will get owned in every way so stop it and enjoy this amazing in game screen shot.

NOW for all making sure that the E3 2005 is not CGI:

"After what we thought was a short trailer, the game dropped straight into actual, live gameplay. And I do mean live, the game was actually being played by one of the developers as we watched."

"First, the game appears to not feature a HUD, in fact the only time I saw anything on the screen that was hud like was when the developer fired or switched weapons."

http://kotaku.com/gaming/e307/killzone-2-impressions-277070.php

That's why a lot of people thought it was CGI cuz there was no HUD.

Killzone still has along way to go to beat gears.

[/QUOT

It's already been stated that Killzone has a much higher polycount than gears meaning overrall it has more detail.

I bet no-one would have ever seen this one coming a few years ago...

Killzone 2's graphics take a dump on Halo 3's. :o

[QUOTE="BLAUcopter"][QUOTE="TekkenMaster606"][QUOTE="BLAUcopter"]If your going to post pics of gears at least post some some that ACTUALLY resemble what the game looks like...

Killzone still has along way to go to beat gears

TekkenMaster606

Want to see what my digital camera can make Twilight Princess look like? Srsly. Bring us framebuffer shots.

ahhh poor fan boys.

Wow, is that the best you could come up with? Pathetic. Posters with 10x more dignity, intelligence, and respect around here have called me worse.

A digital camera shot from your flat panel is going to make anything look godly. Everyone knows that.

Listen loser I dont need to stand up for gears or prove to you it looks godly. All the reviews and awards did that for me, somthing which you can't say for KZ.....

Most spectacular game ever. Even if the pre-alpha textures could be better, it's the most graphically impressive game ever. Ok try this : look at the KZ2 trailer then look at the original E3 2005 trailer. You'll see this one looks WAY cooler. And all the other games look slow and bland now...Timesplitter14

Oh come on now, theres a game called Crysis.

[QUOTE="bad82man82"]

Let us make a memorial for Halo LOL.

Dualshockin

That's a ridiculous comparison. Halo 3 has made no attempt to be gritty or realistic, which is KZ2's primary focus.

I was impressed.smokeydabear076

[QUOTE="Dualshockin"][QUOTE="bad82man82"]

Let us make a memorial for Halo LOL.

JakeT

That's a ridiculous comparison. Halo 3 has made no attempt to be gritty or realistic, which is KZ2's primary focus.

im a cow and i can admit GEoW is vary impressice graphicly, in not a fan of some other stuff in the game but it looks great. Killzone lived up to the hype of being better looking then gears and will look even better at release. The only part to wait for is the game play, that will make or break it.

[QUOTE="TekkenMaster606"][QUOTE="BLAUcopter"][QUOTE="TekkenMaster606"][QUOTE="BLAUcopter"]If your going to post pics of gears at least post some some that ACTUALLY resemble what the game looks like...

Killzone still has along way to go to beat gears

BLAUcopter

Want to see what my digital camera can make Twilight Princess look like? Srsly. Bring us framebuffer shots.

ahhh poor fan boys.

Wow, is that the best you could come up with? Pathetic. Posters with 10x more dignity, intelligence, and respect around here have called me worse.

A digital camera shot from your flat panel is going to make anything look godly. Everyone knows that.

Listen loser I dont need to stand up for gears or prove to you it looks godly. All the reviews and awards did that for me, somthing which you can't say for KZ.....

you know what i could debate with you about Gears. but why are you mentioning it anwyas lemming? i will be playing the BEST version soon and i only own one next-gen console..eheh like there really is more then one ( =

Most spectacular game ever. Even if the pre-alpha textures could be better, it's the most graphically impressive game ever. Ok try this : look at the KZ2 trailer then look at the original E3 2005 trailer. You'll see this one looks WAY cooler. And all the other games look slow and bland now...Timesplitter14

Not really from where I'm coming. The trailer however was build and edited to give that feeling. Soo.... what I'm saying is that I have to see more, like straight gameplay for atleast a few minutes, instead of many few parts build into one trailer.

I seriously still can't believe that they did it. Dencore

It shocked me as well Dencore. I was honestly expecting it tio look like a bad 360 game,e specially after some of the underwhelming impressions from GDC. but i'll be damned if that isn't one fo the most impressive console shooters ever seen. The animations are up there with bioshock but on a far larger scale with more pyrotechnics

though im a fanboy, and i admit it. i like your post because they are always fair and neutral. keep it up north

Kalias

Thank you sir, i shall try!!!! :)

[QUOTE="TekkenMaster606"][QUOTE="BLAUcopter"][QUOTE="TekkenMaster606"][QUOTE="BLAUcopter"]If your going to post pics of gears at least post some some that ACTUALLY resemble what the game looks like...

Killzone still has along way to go to beat gears

BLAUcopter

Want to see what my digital camera can make Twilight Princess look like? Srsly. Bring us framebuffer shots.

ahhh poor fan boys.

Wow, is that the best you could come up with? Pathetic. Posters with 10x more dignity, intelligence, and respect around here have called me worse.

A digital camera shot from your flat panel is going to make anything look godly. Everyone knows that.

Listen loser I dont need to stand up for gears or prove to you it looks godly. All the reviews and awards did that for me, somthing which you can't say for KZ.....

Oooh, now you're downright flaming me. Very nice. Shows the utmost in respect and civility.

[QUOTE="Dualshockin"][QUOTE="bad82man82"]

Let us make a memorial for Halo LOL.

JakeT

That's a ridiculous comparison. Halo 3 has made no attempt to be gritty or realistic, which is KZ2's primary focus.

MOD defense force....engage

A very impressive showing imo. I really like the feel of the game and the animations rocked imo.

[QUOTE="JakeT"][QUOTE="Dualshockin"][QUOTE="bad82man82"]

Let us make a memorial for Halo LOL.

Dualshockin

That's a ridiculous comparison. Halo 3 has made no attempt to be gritty or realistic, which is KZ2's primary focus.

Why though? Not every game needs to be that way. I thought KZ2 looked awesome, and Halo3 looked awesome as well. We are both gertting treated to fanatastic shooters. Just for once.......can we not agree on this????

That's a ridiculous comparison. Halo 3 has made no attempt to be gritty or realistic, which is KZ2's primary focus.

JakeT

But it was touted by many as a graphical powerhouse, and so far it does not even come close to Geow in that department

I bet no-one would have ever seen this one coming a few years ago...

Killzone 2's graphics take a dump on Halo 3's. :o

Timstuff

[QUOTE="Dualshockin"][QUOTE="bad82man82"]

Let us make a memorial for Halo LOL.

JakeT

That's a ridiculous comparison. Halo 3 has made no attempt to be gritty or realistic, which is KZ2's primary focus.

Cleary. Halo is designed to create the feeling of playing in a huge massive world filled with civilization in conflict. Killzone is designed to create an epic and chaotic battlefield the represents a nation on fire.

[QUOTE="JakeT"][QUOTE="Dualshockin"][QUOTE="bad82man82"]

Let us make a memorial for Halo LOL.

Dualshockin

That's a ridiculous comparison. Halo 3 has made no attempt to be gritty or realistic, which is KZ2's primary focus.

Because that would run entirely counter to the graphical style already in place and it would cease to be Halo at that point. You might as well hack on Jak and Daxter or Viva Pinata for not being realistic.

It's already been stated that Killzone has a much higher polycount than gears meaning overrall it has more detail.

swade

Here is an excerpt from 1up's impressions:

The presentation and attention to detail are key. The game doesn't look as good as the 2005 trailer, naturally, but it looks close to as good as any other console shooter. We'd say that currently Gears of War tops it, and a few other titles are on the same visual level, but the game looks extremely nice.

This game looks great so far, but not as good as hyped. I was impressed with the lighting and animations the most, I must say. However, the environment textures are your typical low res PS3 textures. Overall, I would give it a B++. Bout time Sony and Guerilla!!

[QUOTE="Timesplitter14"]Most spectacular game ever. Even if the pre-alpha textures could be better, it's the most graphically impressive game ever. Ok try this : look at the KZ2 trailer then look at the original E3 2005 trailer. You'll see this one looks WAY cooler. And all the other games look slow and bland now...Metroid_Time

Oh come on now, theres a game called Crysis.

I wasn't talking about the graphics, but more about the cinematic feeling with all the stuff going on and the incredible artstyle

[QUOTE="JakeT"][QUOTE="Dualshockin"][QUOTE="bad82man82"]

Let us make a memorial for Halo LOL.

tonythestudent

That's a ridiculous comparison. Halo 3 has made no attempt to be gritty or realistic, which is KZ2's primary focus.

MOD defense force....engage

Do logic and rational points bother you? I'm so sorry.

But it was touted by many as a graphical powerhouse, and so far it does not even come close to Geow in that departmentNorthlandMan

Bungie said a long time ago that they never meant to rival Gears in graphics. They also purposely used less polygons in their models.

Nice looking trailer but why did they have to rip off F.E.A.R and Half Life 2? Still it's a nice artstyle even if it has been done to death already.

[QUOTE="JakeT"]

That's a ridiculous comparison. Halo 3 has made no attempt to be gritty or realistic, which is KZ2's primary focus.

NorthlandMan

But it was touted by many as a graphical powerhouse, and so far it does not even come close to Geow in that department

Touted by whom? A bunch of crazed fanboys?Of course they're going to say that,it's what they do.

Hell, there are a few blind folks, saying that Killzone 2 looks better than Crysis. Are we to believe them?

[QUOTE="tonythestudent"][QUOTE="JakeT"][QUOTE="Dualshockin"][QUOTE="bad82man82"]

Let us make a memorial for Halo LOL.

JakeT

That's a ridiculous comparison. Halo 3 has made no attempt to be gritty or realistic, which is KZ2's primary focus.

MOD defense force....engage

Do logic and rational points bother you? I'm so sorry.

Oh did that hit home? I'm so sorry

[QUOTE="Metroid_Time"]

[QUOTE="Timesplitter14"]Most spectacular game ever. Even if the pre-alpha textures could be better, it's the most graphically impressive game ever. Ok try this : look at the KZ2 trailer then look at the original E3 2005 trailer. You'll see this one looks WAY cooler. And all the other games look slow and bland now...Timesplitter14

Oh come on now, theres a game called Crysis.

I wasn't talking about the graphics, but more about the cinematic feeling with all the stuff going on and the incredible artstyle

Fair enough. It's going to feel more cinemematic though by default because Crysis is a free-roaming FPS.

Why though? Not every game needs to be that way. I thought KZ2 looked awesome, and Halo3 looked awesome as well. We are both gertting treated to fanatastic shooters. Just for once.......can we not agree on this????TheCrazed420

[QUOTE="TekkenMaster606"][QUOTE="BLAUcopter"][QUOTE="TekkenMaster606"][QUOTE="BLAUcopter"]If your going to post pics of gears at least post some some that ACTUALLY resemble what the game looks like...

Killzone still has along way to go to beat gears

BLAUcopter

Want to see what my digital camera can make Twilight Princess look like? Srsly. Bring us framebuffer shots.

ahhh poor fan boys.

Wow, is that the best you could come up with? Pathetic. Posters with 10x more dignity, intelligence, and respect around here have called me worse.

A digital camera shot from your flat panel is going to make anything look godly. Everyone knows that.

Listen loser I dont need to stand up for gears or prove to you it looks godly. All the reviews and awards did that for me, somthing which you can't say for KZ.....