Killzone 2, Haters Beware (new online info)

with a greatsingle player and multiplayer, Gears 9.6, Killzone 1 , well you know.

first two wrongs don't make a righ trefferingto you and the other guy, gears one and killzone can't even be compared honestyl one is a ps2 game that came out in 2004 the other is a 360 game that came out when there was no competion around in 2006.Also saying gears had a great sp is going out on a stretch but saying the mp was great is just wrong.

Meh......an 8.5 here.

After watching all recent ingame footage, the AI STILL NEEDS work.

Enemies just stand there, shoot at you and take multiple shots, and then die with rag-doll physics to the ground. I mean seriously, with all the Bluray technology and cell working.......WTF is that?

M8ingSeezun

with a greatsingle player and multiplayer, Gears 9.6, Killzone 1 , well you know.

Iceman2911

first two wrongs don't make a righ trefferingto you and the other guy, gears one and killzone can't even be compared honestyl one is a ps2 game that came out in 2004 the other is a 360 game that came out when there was no competion around in 2006.Also saying gears had a great sp is going out on a stretch but saying the mp was great is just wrong.

it had multiplayer goty, and it didnt get that for no reason.

[QUOTE="zomgwtfbbqlol1"][QUOTE="blitzkid1"][QUOTE="zomgwtfbbqlol1"][QUOTE="blitzkid1"][QUOTE="zomgwtfbbqlol1"][QUOTE="blitzkid1"]EPICs experience with online games >>>> Guerrilla Games Online experience.

blitzkid1

Ask somebody for thier opionin ? LOL .

Im trolling ? Whatever when all is said and done Resistance will be hyped beyond belief and it will flop horribly , nobodys going to be talking about its muiltiplayer , people are still going to be playing gears 2 multiplayerlong after killzones 2 multiplayer, Go hype up your game which is a sequalto a mediocore game.

Iwill have fun gaming with a greatsingle player and multiplayer, Gears 9.6, Killzone 1 , well you know.

u can't really compare killzone 1 with killzone 2

killzone1 had a very small team of dev. and little amounts of money (compared to like 60mil for killzone 2)

and no suport from sony

i think killzone 2 looks great,but how bout we all stfu and wait tell its out befor we start judging

[QUOTE="zomgwtfbbqlol1"][QUOTE="blitzkid1"][QUOTE="zomgwtfbbqlol1"][QUOTE="blitzkid1"][QUOTE="zomgwtfbbqlol1"][QUOTE="blitzkid1"]EPICs experience with online games >>>> Guerrilla Games Online experience.

blitzkid1

Ask somebody for thier opionin ? LOL .

Im trolling ? Whatever when all is said and done Resistance will be hyped beyond belief and it will flop horribly , nobodys going to be talking about its muiltiplayer , people are still going to be playing gears 2 multiplayerlong after killzones 2 multiplayer, Go hype up your game which is a sequalto a mediocore game.

Iwill have fun gaming with a greatsingle player and multiplayer, Gears 9.6, Killzone 1 , well you know.

Comparing a PS2 game (which launched 2004) with a Box game? (that came out 2 years ago) :lol::lol:

It's still got some convincing to do, KZ1 was terribad and it still had all the good previews.

I'll put my Hypometer at 6.0, so hopefully I'll be pleasantly surprised.

TenP

[QUOTE="Iceman2911"]

with a greatsingle player and multiplayer, Gears 9.6, Killzone 1 , well you know.

blitzkid1

first two wrongs don't make a righ trefferingto you and the other guy, gears one and killzone can't even be compared honestyl one is a ps2 game that came out in 2004 the other is a 360 game that came out when there was no competion around in 2006.Also saying gears had a great sp is going out on a stretch but saying the mp was great is just wrong.

it had multiplayer goty, and it didnt get that for no reason.

like I said no competion

[QUOTE="Gamer556"]Are we forgetting that this is Geurilla Games? They've made one decent PSP game. That's it. Killzone 2 is shaping up nicely, but I don't see how you can look at their track record and hype this 9.5.zomgwtfbbqlol1

Developers don't get signed and traded like professional athletes. These guys are mostly the same guys who made the original Killzone and that crappy Vietnam game, although I'm sure the studio has grown a bit since. The real difference this time around is the massive budget they have to work with.

I'm not saying Guerilla can't become a great developer. They can. I just think all this hype is jumping the gun a bit.

[QUOTE="TenP"]

It's still got some convincing to do, KZ1 was terribad and it still had all the good previews.

I'll put my Hypometer at 6.0, so hopefully I'll be pleasantly surprised.

zomgwtfbbqlol1

I'm just saying I'm not convinced, like I won't be convinced if they make another Too Human, Lair, or Haze that has good previews. It looks good, but not good enough for the hype it's getting. And for the hype thing? I always hype games low, floppage doesn't happen when you do that.

[QUOTE="zomgwtfbbqlol1"][QUOTE="Gamer556"]Are we forgetting that this is Geurilla Games? They've made one decent PSP game. That's it. Killzone 2 is shaping up nicely, but I don't see how you can look at their track record and hype this 9.5.Gamer556

Developers don't get signed and traded like professional athletes. These guys are mostly the same guys who made the original Killzone and that crappy Vietnam game, although I'm sure the studio has grown a bit since. The real difference this time around is the massive budget they have to work with.

I'm not saying Guerilla can't become a great developer. They can. I just think all this hype is jumping the gun a bit.

Killzone 1

-20 devs

-3rd party

-low budget

-made for PC then rushed to PS2

Killzone 2

-135+ devs

-made for PS3 with loads of time

-1st pary owned by sony

-60million+ dollar budget

no1 is jumping the gun

[QUOTE="zomgwtfbbqlol1"][QUOTE="TenP"]

It's still got some convincing to do, KZ1 was terribad and it still had all the good previews.

I'll put my Hypometer at 6.0, so hopefully I'll be pleasantly surprised.

TenP

I'm just saying I'm not convinced, like I won't be convinced if they make another Too Human, Lair, or Haze that has good previews. It looks good, but not good enough for the hype it's getting. And for the hype thing? I always hype games low, floppage doesn't happen when you do that.

[QUOTE="Gamer556"]

[QUOTE="zomgwtfbbqlol1"][QUOTE="Gamer556"]Are we forgetting that this is Geurilla Games? They've made one decent PSP game. That's it. Killzone 2 is shaping up nicely, but I don't see how you can look at their track record and hype this 9.5.zomgwtfbbqlol1

Developers don't get signed and traded like professional athletes. These guys are mostly the same guys who made the original Killzone and that crappy Vietnam game, although I'm sure the studio has grown a bit since. The real difference this time around is the massive budget they have to work with.

I'm not saying Guerilla can't become a great developer. They can. I just think all this hype is jumping the gun a bit.

Killzone 1

-20 devs

-3rd party

-low budget

-made for PC then rushed to PS2

Killzone 2

-135+ devs

-made for PS3 with loads of time

-1st pary owned by sony

-60million+ dollar budget

no1 is jumping the gun

Too Human

- Microsoft,Silicon Knights

- 1st party owned microsoft

- 80 million dollar budget

-6.0

[QUOTE="zomgwtfbbqlol1"][QUOTE="Gamer556"]

[QUOTE="zomgwtfbbqlol1"][QUOTE="Gamer556"]Are we forgetting that this is Geurilla Games? They've made one decent PSP game. That's it. Killzone 2 is shaping up nicely, but I don't see how you can look at their track record and hype this 9.5.blitzkid1

Developers don't get signed and traded like professional athletes. These guys are mostly the same guys who made the original Killzone and that crappy Vietnam game, although I'm sure the studio has grown a bit since. The real difference this time around is the massive budget they have to work with.

I'm not saying Guerilla can't become a great developer. They can. I just think all this hype is jumping the gun a bit.

Killzone 1

-20 devs

-3rd party

-low budget

-made for PC then rushed to PS2

Killzone 2

-135+ devs

-made for PS3 with loads of time

-1st pary owned by sony

-60million+ dollar budget

no1 is jumping the gun

Too Human

- Microsoft,Silicon Knights

- 1st party owned microsoft

- 80 million dollar budget

-6.0

Yea but they didnt have that many developers thats why it sucked

[QUOTE="blitzkid1"][QUOTE="zomgwtfbbqlol1"][QUOTE="Gamer556"]

[QUOTE="zomgwtfbbqlol1"][QUOTE="Gamer556"]Are we forgetting that this is Geurilla Games? They've made one decent PSP game. That's it. Killzone 2 is shaping up nicely, but I don't see how you can look at their track record and hype this 9.5.REBEL2100x

Developers don't get signed and traded like professional athletes. These guys are mostly the same guys who made the original Killzone and that crappy Vietnam game, although I'm sure the studio has grown a bit since. The real difference this time around is the massive budget they have to work with.

I'm not saying Guerilla can't become a great developer. They can. I just think all this hype is jumping the gun a bit.

Killzone 1

-20 devs

-3rd party

-low budget

-made for PC then rushed to PS2

Killzone 2

-135+ devs

-made for PS3 with loads of time

-1st pary owned by sony

-60million+ dollar budget

no1 is jumping the gun

Too Human

- Microsoft,Silicon Knights

- 1st party owned microsoft

- 80 million dollar budget

-6.0

Yea but they didnt have that many developers thats why it sucked

Is that the best excuse you can come up with ?

[QUOTE="zomgwtfbbqlol1"][QUOTE="Gamer556"]

[QUOTE="zomgwtfbbqlol1"][QUOTE="Gamer556"]Are we forgetting that this is Geurilla Games? They've made one decent PSP game. That's it. Killzone 2 is shaping up nicely, but I don't see how you can look at their track record and hype this 9.5.blitzkid1

Developers don't get signed and traded like professional athletes. These guys are mostly the same guys who made the original Killzone and that crappy Vietnam game, although I'm sure the studio has grown a bit since. The real difference this time around is the massive budget they have to work with.

I'm not saying Guerilla can't become a great developer. They can. I just think all this hype is jumping the gun a bit.

Killzone 1

-20 devs

-3rd party

-low budget

-made for PC then rushed to PS2

Killzone 2

-135+ devs

-made for PS3 with loads of time

-1st pary owned by sony

-60million+ dollar budget

no1 is jumping the gun

Too Human

- Microsoft,Silicon Knights

- 1st party owned microsoft

- 80 million dollar budget

-6.0

[QUOTE="Gamer556"]

[QUOTE="zomgwtfbbqlol1"][QUOTE="Gamer556"]Are we forgetting that this is Geurilla Games? They've made one decent PSP game. That's it. Killzone 2 is shaping up nicely, but I don't see how you can look at their track record and hype this 9.5.zomgwtfbbqlol1

Developers don't get signed and traded like professional athletes. These guys are mostly the same guys who made the original Killzone and that crappy Vietnam game, although I'm sure the studio has grown a bit since. The real difference this time around is the massive budget they have to work with.

I'm not saying Guerilla can't become a great developer. They can. I just think all this hype is jumping the gun a bit.

Killzone 1

-20 devs

-3rd party

-low budget

-made for PC then rushed to PS2

Killzone 2

-135+ devs

-made for PS3 with loads of time

-1st pary owned by sony

-60million+ dollar budget

no1 is jumping the gun

Of course you're jumping the gun. Even with a larger staff, Guerilla Games still hasn't done anything. Plenty of small teams with low budgets that have made great games (ie: Braid), and plenty of large teams with huge budgets have made bad ones (ie: EA). That doesn't prove anything. Until Guerilla Games actually makes something worthwhile, they're still just some studio that made Killzone and that crappy Vietnam game.

[QUOTE="blitzkid1"][QUOTE="zomgwtfbbqlol1"][QUOTE="Gamer556"]

[QUOTE="zomgwtfbbqlol1"][QUOTE="Gamer556"]Are we forgetting that this is Geurilla Games? They've made one decent PSP game. That's it. Killzone 2 is shaping up nicely, but I don't see how you can look at their track record and hype this 9.5.zomgwtfbbqlol1

Developers don't get signed and traded like professional athletes. These guys are mostly the same guys who made the original Killzone and that crappy Vietnam game, although I'm sure the studio has grown a bit since. The real difference this time around is the massive budget they have to work with.

I'm not saying Guerilla can't become a great developer. They can. I just think all this hype is jumping the gun a bit.

Killzone 1

-20 devs

-3rd party

-low budget

-made for PC then rushed to PS2

Killzone 2

-135+ devs

-made for PS3 with loads of time

-1st pary owned by sony

-60million+ dollar budget

no1 is jumping the gun

Too Human

- Microsoft,Silicon Knights

- 1st party owned microsoft

- 80 million dollar budget

-6.0

Get my facts straight the ip is owned by microsoft.

[QUOTE="zomgwtfbbqlol1"][QUOTE="blitzkid1"][QUOTE="zomgwtfbbqlol1"][QUOTE="Gamer556"]

[QUOTE="zomgwtfbbqlol1"][QUOTE="Gamer556"]Are we forgetting that this is Geurilla Games? They've made one decent PSP game. That's it. Killzone 2 is shaping up nicely, but I don't see how you can look at their track record and hype this 9.5.blitzkid1

Developers don't get signed and traded like professional athletes. These guys are mostly the same guys who made the original Killzone and that crappy Vietnam game, although I'm sure the studio has grown a bit since. The real difference this time around is the massive budget they have to work with.

I'm not saying Guerilla can't become a great developer. They can. I just think all this hype is jumping the gun a bit.

Killzone 1

-20 devs

-3rd party

-low budget

-made for PC then rushed to PS2

Killzone 2

-135+ devs

-made for PS3 with loads of time

-1st pary owned by sony

-60million+ dollar budget

no1 is jumping the gun

Too Human

- Microsoft,Silicon Knights

- 1st party owned microsoft

- 80 million dollar budget

-6.0

Get my facts straight the ip is owned by microsoft.

Sony owns Guerilla Games, they made their own engine for Killzone 2, and has plenty of time to work on it about 4-5 years

blitzkid the title says haters beware so why are you here.Iceman2911

[QUOTE="zomgwtfbbqlol1"][QUOTE="blitzkid1"][QUOTE="zomgwtfbbqlol1"][QUOTE="blitzkid1"][QUOTE="zomgwtfbbqlol1"][QUOTE="blitzkid1"]EPICs experience with online games >>>> Guerrilla Games Online experience.

blitzkid1

Ask somebody for thier opionin ? LOL .

Im trolling ? Whatever when all is said and done Resistance will be hyped beyond belief and it will flop horribly , nobodys going to be talking about its muiltiplayer , people are still going to be playing gears 2 multiplayerlong after killzones 2 multiplayer, Go hype up your game which is a sequalto a mediocore game.

Iwill have fun gaming with a greatsingle player and multiplayer, Gears 9.6, Killzone 1 , well you know.

Comparing a PS2 game that had a small team and limited hardware for shooters to a 2006 game with with better hardware and full Microsoft support and Money. Killzone 2 has more money (60 million) and a couple years and full sony support with better hardware.:o

My main problem with Killzone 2 is that EVERY ENEMY LOOKS THE SAME...AHUGECAT

....

yea they all look the same to me....

.....

and? lol MS dosnt own silicon knights, the 80 million dollar budget was form the start of development for the PS1

Sony owns Guerilla Games, they made their own engine for Killzone 2, and has plenty of time to work on it about 4-5 years

zomgwtfbbqlol1

Silicon Knights had plenty of time to work on Too Human your point ?

My main problem with Killzone 2 is that EVERY ENEMY LOOKS THE SAME...AHUGECAT

Not really. different classes = different models

[QUOTE="zomgwtfbbqlol1"]

and? lol MS dosnt own silicon knights, the 80 million dollar budget was form the start of development for the PS1

Sony owns Guerilla Games, they made their own engine for Killzone 2, and has plenty of time to work on it about 4-5 years

blitzkid1

Silicon Knights had plenty of time to work on Too Human your point ?

[QUOTE="AHUGECAT"]My main problem with Killzone 2 is that EVERY ENEMY LOOKS THE SAME...zomgwtfbbqlol1

yea they all look the same to me....

.....

Your pics proved my point - a LITTLE costume change (not even significant) doesn't constitute as different types of enemies.

This game needs more diversity color, level and enemywise otherwise it looks great.

[QUOTE="blitzkid1"][QUOTE="zomgwtfbbqlol1"]

and? lol MS dosnt own silicon knights, the 80 million dollar budget was form the start of development for the PS1

Sony owns Guerilla Games, they made their own engine for Killzone 2, and has plenty of time to work on it about 4-5 years

zomgwtfbbqlol1

Silicon Knights had plenty of time to work on Too Human your point ?

Link ?

[QUOTE="zomgwtfbbqlol1"]

and? lol MS dosnt own silicon knights, the 80 million dollar budget was form the start of development for the PS1

Sony owns Guerilla Games, they made their own engine for Killzone 2, and has plenty of time to work on it about 4-5 years

blitzkid1

Silicon Knights had plenty of time to work on Too Human your point ?

and they failed now your but soar and is complaining about a game on a system you don't even have.Get over kilzone2 looks good and many people agree.

[QUOTE="zomgwtfbbqlol1"]

[QUOTE="AHUGECAT"]My main problem with Killzone 2 is that EVERY ENEMY LOOKS THE SAME...AHUGECAT

yea they all look the same to me....

.....

Your pics proved my point - a LITTLE costume change (not even significant) doesn't constitute as different types of enemies.

This game needs more diversity color, level and enemywise otherwise it looks great.

[QUOTE="blitzkid1"][QUOTE="zomgwtfbbqlol1"]

and? lol MS dosnt own silicon knights, the 80 million dollar budget was form the start of development for the PS1

Sony owns Guerilla Games, they made their own engine for Killzone 2, and has plenty of time to work on it about 4-5 years

Iceman2911

Silicon Knights had plenty of time to work on Too Human your point ?

and they failed now your but soar and is complaining about a game on a system you don't even have.Get over kilzone2 looks good and many people agree.

I dont have too human, and i didnt say killzone 2 looks bad, i said itll flop.

[QUOTE="AHUGECAT"][QUOTE="zomgwtfbbqlol1"]

[QUOTE="AHUGECAT"]My main problem with Killzone 2 is that EVERY ENEMY LOOKS THE SAME...zomgwtfbbqlol1

yea they all look the same to me....

.....

Your pics proved my point - a LITTLE costume change (not even significant) doesn't constitute as different types of enemies.

This game needs more diversity color, level and enemywise otherwise it looks great.

all these guys lookthe same eh ?

[QUOTE="zomgwtfbbqlol1"][QUOTE="blitzkid1"][QUOTE="zomgwtfbbqlol1"]

and? lol MS dosnt own silicon knights, the 80 million dollar budget was form the start of development for the PS1

Sony owns Guerilla Games, they made their own engine for Killzone 2, and has plenty of time to work on it about 4-5 years

blitzkid1

Silicon Knights had plenty of time to work on Too Human your point ?

Link ?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Too_Human

"The game was originally being developed using Epic Games' Unreal Engine 3, but is now being developed using an internal engine. On July 19, 2007, it was announced that Silicon Knights was suing Epic Games due to "breach of contract", including "inadequacies" of Epic's support, service, and cooperation with Silicon Knights concerning Unreal Engine 3"

even gamespot had coverage of this

[QUOTE="AHUGECAT"][QUOTE="zomgwtfbbqlol1"]

[QUOTE="AHUGECAT"]My main problem with Killzone 2 is that EVERY ENEMY LOOKS THE SAME...zomgwtfbbqlol1

yea they all look the same to me....

.....

Your pics proved my point - a LITTLE costume change (not even significant) doesn't constitute as different types of enemies.

This game needs more diversity color, level and enemywise otherwise it looks great.

Once Killzone gets some diversity, then I think it'll be AAA status. For now, looks generic..

Iwill have fun gaming with a greatsingle player and multiplayer, Gears 9.6, Killzone 1 , well you know.

Did you just say gears had a good SP? THe SP sucked so hard it wasn't funny. Story sucked and characters were meh. Also great job comparing a TPS and a FPS and also comparing a this gen game to a last gen game. Im sorry epic cant tell a good story to save thier life. Iv seen the MP for gears 2 and its ok,but if you didn't care for gears 1 online its not changing anyones mind what so ever. Since its basically the same with some tweaks. from what I remember not alot was out on consoles to compete with gears when it came out. So yea it won by default.

[QUOTE="zomgwtfbbqlol1"][QUOTE="AHUGECAT"][QUOTE="zomgwtfbbqlol1"]

[QUOTE="AHUGECAT"]My main problem with Killzone 2 is that EVERY ENEMY LOOKS THE SAME...blitzkid1

yea they all look the same to me....

.....

Your pics proved my point - a LITTLE costume change (not even significant) doesn't constitute as different types of enemies.

This game needs more diversity color, level and enemywise otherwise it looks great.

all these guys lookthe same eh ?

yea they do...

[QUOTE="Iceman2911"][QUOTE="blitzkid1"][QUOTE="zomgwtfbbqlol1"]

and? lol MS dosnt own silicon knights, the 80 million dollar budget was form the start of development for the PS1

Sony owns Guerilla Games, they made their own engine for Killzone 2, and has plenty of time to work on it about 4-5 years

blitzkid1

Silicon Knights had plenty of time to work on Too Human your point ?

and they failed now your but soar and is complaining about a game on a system you don't even have.Get over kilzone2 looks good and many people agree.

I dont have too human, and i didnt say killzone 2 looks bad, i said itll flop.

If you think it will flop then good peace why are you still here at this thread arguing with people don't go looking for fights you will probally get beat up.I don't blame you for having too human

[QUOTE="zomgwtfbbqlol1"][QUOTE="AHUGECAT"][QUOTE="zomgwtfbbqlol1"]

[QUOTE="AHUGECAT"]My main problem with Killzone 2 is that EVERY ENEMY LOOKS THE SAME...AHUGECAT

yea they all look the same to me....

.....

Your pics proved my point - a LITTLE costume change (not even significant) doesn't constitute as different types of enemies.

This game needs more diversity color, level and enemywise otherwise it looks great.

Once Killzone gets some diversity, then I think it'll be AAA status. For now, looks generic..

Iwill have fun gaming with a greatsingle player and multiplayer, Gears 9.6, Killzone 1 , well you know.

finalfantasy94

Did you just say gears had a good SP? THe SP sucked so hard it wasn't funny. Story sucked and characters were meh. Also great job comparing a TPS and a FPS and also comparing a this gen game to a last gen game. Im sorry epic cant tell a good story to save thier life. Iv seen the MP for gears 2 and its ok,but if you didn't care for gears 1 online its not changing anyones mind what so ever. Since its basically the same with some tweaks. from what I remember not alot was out on consoles to compete with gears when it came out. So yea it won by default.

I know right it is like he/she wants to get owned and called a fanboy.

[QUOTE="zomgwtfbbqlol1"]

[QUOTE="AHUGECAT"]My main problem with Killzone 2 is that EVERY ENEMY LOOKS THE SAME...AHUGECAT

yea they all look the same to me....

.....

Your pics proved my point - a LITTLE costume change (not even significant) doesn't constitute as different types of enemies.

This game needs more diversity color, level and enemywise otherwise it looks great.

how do u know that the whole game is like that

we've only seen one f***** lvl

wait until the game is out befor u start saying things like that

[QUOTE="zomgwtfbbqlol1"]

[QUOTE="AHUGECAT"]My main problem with Killzone 2 is that EVERY ENEMY LOOKS THE SAME...AHUGECAT

yea they all look the same to me....

.....

Your pics proved my point - a LITTLE costume change (not even significant) doesn't constitute as different types of enemies.

This game needs more diversity color, level and enemywise otherwise it looks great.

Way too picky. Why would there be drastically differen't colors for enemy's costumes? They are one army and one type of people with different ranks. This isn't Halo, where there are multiple alien races who are completely different from each other.

Also, we don't know the full range of enemies in KZ2. KZ:Liberation had dogs and enemies that flew on jetpacks. If they add that, it would be drastically different for you.

[QUOTE="AHUGECAT"][QUOTE="zomgwtfbbqlol1"]

[QUOTE="AHUGECAT"]My main problem with Killzone 2 is that EVERY ENEMY LOOKS THE SAME...johnnyboy5000

yea they all look the same to me....

.....

Your pics proved my point - a LITTLE costume change (not even significant) doesn't constitute as different types of enemies.

This game needs more diversity color, level and enemywise otherwise it looks great.

how do u know that the whole game is like that

we've only seen one f***** lvl

wait until the game is out befor u start saying things like that

I can safely say every bad guy in this game will look the same.

[QUOTE="zomgwtfbbqlol1"][QUOTE="blitzkid1"][QUOTE="zomgwtfbbqlol1"][QUOTE="blitzkid1"][QUOTE="zomgwtfbbqlol1"]

and? lol MS dosnt own silicon knights, the 80 million dollar budget was form the start of development for the PS1

Sony owns Guerilla Games, they made their own engine for Killzone 2, and has plenty of time to work on it about 4-5 years

blitzkid1

Silicon Knights had plenty of time to work on Too Human your point ?

Link ?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Too_Human

"The game was originally being developed using Epic Games' Unreal Engine 3, but is now being developed using an internal engine. On July 19, 2007, it was announced that Silicon Knights was suing Epic Games due to "breach of contract", including "inadequacies" of Epic's support, service, and cooperation with Silicon Knights concerning Unreal Engine 3"

even gamespot had coverage of this

You lost all credibility you said the game changed engines so many times and you said a few years back (2007) you just contradicted yourself, i dont have to speak with you anymore.

"then finally a few years back they settled wiht MS, and made it for unreal engine, then epic didnt want that so last year they changed engines"

now stop trolling

[QUOTE="johnnyboy5000"]

how do u know that the whole game is like that

we've only seen one f***** lvl

wait until the game is out befor u start saying things like that

AHUGECAT

I can safely say every bad guy in this game will look the same.

If that is true (no way to tell until the game releases). Then it still wouldn't matter if the game is amazing and fun. Look at Gears 1. Scored very high with minimal enemy designs and a universal grey color pallete.

[QUOTE="johnnyboy5000"][QUOTE="AHUGECAT"][QUOTE="zomgwtfbbqlol1"]

[QUOTE="AHUGECAT"]My main problem with Killzone 2 is that EVERY ENEMY LOOKS THE SAME...AHUGECAT

yea they all look the same to me....

.....

Your pics proved my point - a LITTLE costume change (not even significant) doesn't constitute as different types of enemies.

This game needs more diversity color, level and enemywise otherwise it looks great.

how do u know that the whole game is like that

we've only seen one f***** lvl

wait until the game is out befor u start saying things like that

I can safely say every bad guy in this game will look the same.

well wat do u expect,its an army

in an army,they all dress the same