Sorry but no! I've recently become a KZ2 fanboy of sorts. Can't play anything else lately. But comparing it to crysis graphically just ain't gonna happen!
Killzone 2 Vs. Crysis
This topic is locked from further discussion.
yawn 
horrible troll is horrible
Comparing the two games in motion makes an even better case for Killzone 2
Note the horrid animation in Crysis.
You can't talk badly about Crysis because Hermits tend to have meltdowns when they realise that a $400 console has better looking games then their overpriced super rig. And lemmings will jump right on the bandwagon with them since they're still lovin' up on Halo 3 which look honestly looks like an N64 game and they know that nothing on the 360 can compete.
Even though you cherry picked those gifs. Destructible environments > Animation. It actually ADDS to gameplay.Comparing the two games in motion makes an even better case for Killzone 2
Note the horrid animation in Crysis.
You can't talk badly about Crysis because Hermits tend to have meltdowns when they realise that a $400 console has better looking games then their overpriced super rig. And lemmings will jump right on the bandwagon with them since they're still lovin' up on Halo 3 which look honestly looks like an N64 game and they know that nothing on the 360 can compete.
MegajerkNYC
This PWNs both of them,not just because it looks better but because Scrat rules. Now.... /thread
Soz I couldn't find any other Crysis gifs. Nobody makes them because the game does not impress in motion (yes I do own the game).
As for Destructible enviroments being better then animation:
You might be right ;)
Killzone 2's destruction is cosmetic and scripted - yes ive played the bit the bottom gif. Its not comparable to Crysis'sSoz I couldn't find any other Crysis gifs. Nobody makes them because the game does not impress in motion (yes I do own the game).
As for Destructible enviroments being better then animation:
You might be right ;)
MegajerkNYC
[QUOTE="DragonfireXZ95"] Destructible environments > Animation. It actually ADDS to gameplay.lowe0Except that no game, not even Crysis, has good environmental destruction. Look at the GIF of Crysis of the guy being thrown through the wall - it's not actually breaking anything; the bricks are just sliding apart. The same goes for destroying buildings - you can knock down a tin shack easily enough, but a brick of C4 can't take out a cinderblock wall? Everyone's destructability sucks, though DICE's tech in Bad Company 2 sounds like a good start (apparently now you can destroy a building's frame and collapse it, instead of just knocking holes in the wall). Until someone gets it right, it's still just a gimmick (see Red Faction).Because that is a custom map, its not well made - let alone bricks are hard to simulate. What it does show, is how many physics objects there are in just a wall.
As for the destruction of larger buildings - its a design choice, however such structures are much harder to simulate.
And Red Factions destruction *is* good, as far as buildings are concerned its one of the best around, despite its quirks.
Now that we settled that Scrat PWNs all,...end.../thread
Here's a nuke tapping a shack.
thats a TECH Demo, why are you posting this garbage?
Here's a nuke tapping a shack.
Tresca_
Here's a nuke tapping a shack.
Tresca_
Where did you find that? And yeah, that is just something else that PWNs both games.
[QUOTE="Tresca_"]
Here's a nuke tapping a shack.
Trmpt
Where did you find that? And yeah, that is just something else that PWNs both games.
That's from Crysis.Even though you cherry picked those gifs. Destructible environments > Animation. It actually ADDS to gameplay.MegajerkNYC
Soz I couldn't find any other Crysis gifs. Nobody makes them because the game does not impress in motion (yes I do own the game).
As for Destructible enviroments being better then animation:
You might be right ;)
This shows how the Killzone 2 game engine pales in comparison to the CryEngine 2 ESPECIALLY when it comes to physics lol.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YG5qDeWHNmk&feature=related
Behold the 3000 exploding barrels!!
[QUOTE="MegajerkNYC"] Even though you cherry picked those gifs. Destructible environments > Animation. It actually ADDS to gameplay.
DAZZER7
Soz I couldn't find any other Crysis gifs. Nobody makes them because the game does not impress in motion (yes I do own the game).
As for Destructible enviroments being better then animation:
You might be right ;)
This shows how the Killzone 2 game engine pales in comparison to the CryEngine 2 ESPECIALLY when it comes to physics lol.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YG5qDeWHNmk&feature=related
Behold the 3000 exploding barrels!!
Fisrt of ALL. Are you kidding me? This is a joke, KZ2 could easily do something as pointless as that, any game with a decent physics engine could do that. Heck even LBP could do something as simple as that. Second of all, there is no way that the barrels would even stand like that if we were being totally realistic.(early in the trailer it shows that a good portion of them are HANGING off the cliff).
Log in to comment