which do you think will have the better graphics................................ Why did I ask this we already know the answer :P
This topic is locked from further discussion.
which do you think will have the better graphics................................ Why did I ask this we already know the answer :P
This is going to be a very painful thread :(...But we should just hold off until Halo Reach is released...
Ya because graphics matter so much. Which game will sell better? Which shows which one more gamers would rather play Which game will still have a very active online player base a year or two later?which do you think will have the better graphics................................ Why did I ask this we already know the answer :P
BlackTragedy
[QUOTE="BlackTragedy"]Ya because graphics matter so much. Which game will sell better? Which shows which one more gamers would rather play Which game will still have a very active online player base a year or two later?which do you think will have the better graphics................................ Why did I ask this we already know the answer :P
CanYouDiglt
No but they matter in SW.
Ya because graphics matter so much. Which game will sell better? Which shows which one more gamers would rather play Which game will still have a very active online player base a year or two later?[QUOTE="CanYouDiglt"][QUOTE="BlackTragedy"]
which do you think will have the better graphics................................ Why did I ask this we already know the answer :P
BlackTragedy
No but they matter in SW.
To you maybe. Sadly there are to many people now that only care about graphics and that is the only way to judge if a game is good or not. Master Chief has become a game icon because the Halo games are that good. I bet 3/4 the people on here could not even remember the main guy from KZ2 name. I know I have forgottenC'mon now. We have no gameplay for Reach yet. There is no way to do any proper comparison at all yet. But the expectations are high since we are talking about a brand new engine for Reach, and MS has been talking about this being the game that will push the 360 further than it has ever been. I am not a Halo fan, but I would love it to trump KZ2 in graphics (I expect it to kill KZ2 in gamplay, since I really don't think this was Killzones's strong point). This way Sony and it's devs can have some proper competition and continue to push the PS3's graphics even further. Then the cycle will repeat itself and MS will do the same...hopefully.which do you think will have the better graphics................................ Why did I ask this we already know the answer :P
BlackTragedy
[QUOTE="BlackTragedy"][QUOTE="CanYouDiglt"]Ya because graphics matter so much. Which game will sell better? Which shows which one more gamers would rather play Which game will still have a very active online player base a year or two later?CanYouDiglt
No but they matter in SW.
To you maybe. Sadly there are to many people now that only care about graphics and that is the only way to judge if a game is good or not. Master Chief has become a game icon because the Halo games are that good. I bet 3/4 the people on here could not even remember the main guy from KZ2 name. I know I have forgottentf2>any halo,kz2.halo iconic,yea ok....
To you maybe. Sadly there are to many people now that only care about graphics and that is the only way to judge if a game is good or not. Master Chief has become a game icon because the Halo games are that good. I bet 3/4 the people on here could not even remember the main guy from KZ2 name. I know I have forgotten[QUOTE="CanYouDiglt"][QUOTE="BlackTragedy"]
No but they matter in SW.
reynal1287
tf2>any halo,kz2.halo iconic,yea ok....
yes halo is iconic. did tf2's launch look anything like this?
[QUOTE="reynal1287"]
To you maybe. Sadly there are to many people now that only care about graphics and that is the only way to judge if a game is good or not. Master Chief has become a game icon because the Halo games are that good. I bet 3/4 the people on here could not even remember the main guy from KZ2 name. I know I have forgottenCanYouDiglt
tf2>any halo,kz2.halo iconic,yea ok....
yes halo is iconic. did tf2's launch look anything like this?
But that has more to do with the representation of SALES than with the game actually flopping from just being a poor game or review scores. Remember, a game can flop and still sell millions. I am assuming that the TC was referring to review scores rather than sales when speaking of floppage. But of course, I may be wrong. Many people continue to confuse the two.[QUOTE="reynal1287"]
tf2>any halo,kz2.halo iconic,yea ok....
yes halo is iconic. did tf2's launch look anything like this?
But that has more to do with the representation of SALES than with the game actually flopping from just being a poor game or review scores. Remember, a game can flop and still sell millions. I am assuming that the TC was referring to review scores rather than sales when speaking of floppage. But of course, I may be wrong. Many people continue to confuse the two. i wasn't trying to talk about sales or scores. i was under the impresstion that iconic was how well known a series is and therefore remembered. my point being that halo has proven itself to be iconic by having such a huge following. tf2 is a great game and does have its large fanbase, but i doubt it is as popular worldwide as halo. if halo isn't iconic than how is tf2?While were at it, what's the winning lotto ticket numbers for next week?which do you think will have the better graphics................................ Why did I ask this we already know the answer :P
BlackTragedy
[QUOTE="-Red-Cell-"]crysis completely invalidates this argument What about Crysis 2?Reach, it will be the most recent.
johnny27
Crysis has been out since 2007 and it still hasn't been topped. Your point is invalid.Reach, it will be the most recent.
-Red-Cell-
crysis completely invalidates this argument[QUOTE="johnny27"][QUOTE="-Red-Cell-"]
Reach, it will be the most recent.
skektek
The discussion is between Killzone 2 and Halo: Reach. At this point you are just trolling.
What is this your obligatory post when Crysis is mentioned? Without even looking at the context of the ****ing post?If Reach = killzone II in graphics Reach fails
Reach needs to be better in graphics because its a 2010 title
tupapi006
Who said it needs to be better?? I think it looks excellent as it is, and if you get the obligatory size of engagements, and the relative non-linearity in Halo compared to Killzone, then I won't really care.
knowing what the 360 can put out, i think KZ2 will still be the victor.InfiniteBlak
Just curious, but how do you know what the 360 can put out, unless you have actually used a proper dev kit, designed for the 360?? The only right answer is to wait till launch.
[QUOTE="tupapi006"]
If Reach = killzone II in graphics Reach fails
Reach needs to be better in graphics because its a 2010 title
Who said it needs to be better?? I think it looks excellent as it is, and if you get the obligatory size of engagements, and the relative non-linearity in Halo compared to Killzone, then I won't really care.
yeah because Halo games have huge open worlds, lmao.[QUOTE="siddhu33"][QUOTE="tupapi006"]
If Reach = killzone II in graphics Reach fails
Reach needs to be better in graphics because its a 2010 title
InfiniteBlak
Who said it needs to be better?? I think it looks excellent as it is, and if you get the obligatory size of engagements, and the relative non-linearity in Halo compared to Killzone, then I won't really care.
yeah because Halo games have huge open worlds, lmao.Compared to Killzone 2, which is just an exercise in corridors, Yes.
[QUOTE="C_BozkurT_C"]
great graphics =/= great game
siddhu33
Which is why Halo 3 is still played by more than 500,000 people today.
Halo 3 is mediocre. Killzone 2 will still have better graphics, PS3 has better hardware. Halo reach probably won't even be in the category for best looking game of the year, the VGA trailers was far from impressive. With games like The Last Gaurdian, Mass Effect, Heavy Rain, Brink, Mafia II the only reason halo reach will even be looked at is because of the name.Many people think that MS doesn't care about these things. They're wrong. All companies, excluding nintendo, care about graphics. Yes gameplay is always priority but if your system can't match up to key game components of rival games then you're losing.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment