Killzone 3 will be Playstation's "Halo"

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Eltormo
Eltormo

990

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#201 Eltormo
Member since 2010 • 990 Posts

Sorry TC but nothing on the PS3 can match Halo. Reach is going to destroy it in every single way possible.Sp4rtan_3

MMM i see you played both games for start to finish,can you tell of why Halo Reach will destroy KIllzone 3,you know with spoiler tags so those who don't want to know about the story and every thing from both games yet.

Avatar image for TheMaryCeleste
TheMaryCeleste

314

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#202 TheMaryCeleste
Member since 2010 • 314 Posts

[QUOTE="Sp4rtan_3"]Sorry TC but nothing on the PS3 can match Halo. Reach is going to destroy it in every single way possible.Eltormo

MMM i see you played both games for start to finish,can you tell of why Halo Reach will destroy KIllzone 3,you know with spoiler tags so those who don't want to know about the story and every thing from both games yet.

I think he's pretty much correct (without being a fanboy). Just like Killzone 2 looked prettier than Halo 3, Killzone 3's graphics will transcend Halo: Reach's. But when it came to everything else (campaign, music, characters, longevity, multiplayer, sales, gameplay, controls), Killzone 2 was cut into small bits. And that's the reason Reach is bound to poop all over Killzone 3.

Avatar image for Episode_Eve
Episode_Eve

16986

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#203 Episode_Eve
Member since 2004 • 16986 Posts

I think the Killzone franchise has a quality that matches the best of the best out there. But becoming a "Halo", "Gran Turismo", or "Call of Duty" takes more than just quality. Marketing and accessibility is what these games do the best (not to take anything away from their quality!).

Killzone 3 could go on to sell millions, but I'm not sure it will sell any more than 5, if it even reaches that mark. In terms of critical success and community adoration, I bet it will fair extremely well :). Killzone 3D inbound!

Avatar image for Eltormo
Eltormo

990

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#204 Eltormo
Member since 2010 • 990 Posts

[QUOTE="Eltormo"]

[QUOTE="Sp4rtan_3"]Sorry TC but nothing on the PS3 can match Halo. Reach is going to destroy it in every single way possible.TheMaryCeleste

MMM i see you played both games for start to finish,can you tell of why Halo Reach will destroy KIllzone 3,you know with spoiler tags so those who don't want to know about the story and every thing from both games yet.

I think he's pretty much correct (without being a fanboy). Just like Killzone 2 looked prettier than Halo 3, Killzone 3's graphics will transcend Halo: Reach's. But when it came to everything else (campaign, music, characters, longevity, multiplayer, sales, gameplay, controls), Killzone 2 was cut into small bits. And that's the reason Reach is bound to poop all over Killzone 3.

Killzone 2 campaign is better that Halo 3,second both games have weakness and strenghts,for exmaple Halo 3 has a more robust set of features online,yet it doesn't feature bots,Killzone 2 lacks online co-op see where i am going.

Saying Halo does everything better is a total lie,Killzone 2 was just not graphics dude,in fact it had better AI that Halo 3 as well and sound as well,but if we go for longevity like you calin Killzone 2 beat Halo 3 and Reahc as well,because on 360 longevity cost $50 a year on PS3 is out of the box,and that is something people love to ignore.

Avatar image for TheMaryCeleste
TheMaryCeleste

314

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#205 TheMaryCeleste
Member since 2010 • 314 Posts

[QUOTE="TheMaryCeleste"]

[QUOTE="Eltormo"]

MMM i see you played both games for start to finish,can you tell of why Halo Reach will destroy KIllzone 3,you know with spoiler tags so those who don't want to know about the story and every thing from both games yet.

Eltormo

I think he's pretty much correct (without being a fanboy). Just like Killzone 2 looked prettier than Halo 3, Killzone 3's graphics will transcend Halo: Reach's. But when it came to everything else (campaign, music, characters, longevity, multiplayer, sales, gameplay, controls), Killzone 2 was cut into small bits. And that's the reason Reach is bound to poop all over Killzone 3.

Killzone 2 campaign is better that Halo 3,second both games have weakness and strenghts,for exmaple Halo 3 has a more robust set of features online,yet it doesn't feature bots,Killzone 2 lacks online co-op see where i am going.

Saying Halo does everything better is a total lie,Killzone 2 was just not graphics dude,in fact it had better AI that Halo 3 as well and sound as well,but if we go for longevity like you calin Killzone 2 beat Halo 3 and Reahc as well,because on 360 longevity cost $50 a year on PS3 is out of the box,and that is something people love to ignore.

Killzone 2's longevity was laughable. People stopped playing that game shortly after its release, whereas Halo 3 entertained people for years.

Avatar image for Eltormo
Eltormo

990

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#206 Eltormo
Member since 2010 • 990 Posts

[QUOTE="Eltormo"]

[QUOTE="TheMaryCeleste"]

I think he's pretty much correct (without being a fanboy). Just like Killzone 2 looked prettier than Halo 3, Killzone 3's graphics will transcend Halo: Reach's. But when it came to everything else (campaign, music, characters, longevity, multiplayer, sales, gameplay, controls), Killzone 2 was cut into small bits. And that's the reason Reach is bound to poop all over Killzone 3.

TheMaryCeleste

Killzone 2 campaign is better that Halo 3,second both games have weakness and strenghts,for exmaple Halo 3 has a more robust set of features online,yet it doesn't feature bots,Killzone 2 lacks online co-op see where i am going.

Saying Halo does everything better is a total lie,Killzone 2 was just not graphics dude,in fact it had better AI that Halo 3 as well and sound as well,but if we go for longevity like you calin Killzone 2 beat Halo 3 and Reahc as well,because on 360 longevity cost $50 a year on PS3 is out of the box,and that is something people love to ignore.

Killzone 2's longevity was laughable. People stopped playing that game shortly after its release, whereas Halo 3 entertained people for years.

People still playing Killzone 2 dude,hell Warhawk has like 13,000 community and did not sold half of what Killzone 2 sold,again longevity on 360 cost money,is and add on on 360 on PS3 is free,there is no way around that,also the fact that some one is playing a game for years in nothing say is better than other dude,that is just sad.

Avatar image for TheMaryCeleste
TheMaryCeleste

314

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#207 TheMaryCeleste
Member since 2010 • 314 Posts

[QUOTE="TheMaryCeleste"]

[QUOTE="Eltormo"]

Killzone 2 campaign is better that Halo 3,second both games have weakness and strenghts,for exmaple Halo 3 has a more robust set of features online,yet it doesn't feature bots,Killzone 2 lacks online co-op see where i am going.

Saying Halo does everything better is a total lie,Killzone 2 was just not graphics dude,in fact it had better AI that Halo 3 as well and sound as well,but if we go for longevity like you calin Killzone 2 beat Halo 3 and Reahc as well,because on 360 longevity cost $50 a year on PS3 is out of the box,and that is something people love to ignore.

Eltormo

Killzone 2's longevity was laughable. People stopped playing that game shortly after its release, whereas Halo 3 entertained people for years.

People still playing Killzone 2 dude,hell Warhawk has like 13,000 community and did not sold half of what Killzone 2 sold,again longevity on 360 cost money,is and add on on 360 on PS3 is free,there is no way around that,also the fact that some one is playing a game for years in nothing say is better than other dude,that is just sad.

What does the fact that XBL is not free have to do with this?

Avatar image for Sp4rtan_3
Sp4rtan_3

3495

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#208 Sp4rtan_3
Member since 2010 • 3495 Posts

[QUOTE="Sp4rtan_3"]Sorry TC but nothing on the PS3 can match Halo. Reach is going to destroy it in every single way possible.Eltormo

MMM i see you played both games for start to finish,can you tell of why Halo Reach will destroy KIllzone 3,you know with spoiler tags so those who don't want to know about the story and every thing from both games yet.

I havent played either yet, im just going by how halo 3 destroyed KZ2 so it's natural that Reach will murder KZ3. Idk why people compare the two when Reach is in a hole other ball park then KZ.
Avatar image for TheMaryCeleste
TheMaryCeleste

314

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#209 TheMaryCeleste
Member since 2010 • 314 Posts

I think the Killzone franchise has a quality that matches the best of the best out there. But becoming a "Halo", "Gran Turismo", or "Call of Duty" takes more than just quality. Marketing and accessibility is what these games do the best (not to take anything away from their quality!).

Killzone 3 could go on to sell millions, but I'm not sure it will sell any more than 5, if it even reaches that mark. In terms of critical success and community adoration, I bet it will fair extremely well :). Killzone 3D inbound!

Episode_Eve

If Killzone 3 hits 5 million, then it's a gigantic success (for a PlayStation 3 title).

Avatar image for Zaibach
Zaibach

13466

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#210 Zaibach
Member since 2007 • 13466 Posts

[QUOTE="Episode_Eve"]

I think the Killzone franchise has a quality that matches the best of the best out there. But becoming a "Halo", "Gran Turismo", or "Call of Duty" takes more than just quality. Marketing and accessibility is what these games do the best (not to take anything away from their quality!).

Killzone 3 could go on to sell millions, but I'm not sure it will sell any more than 5, if it even reaches that mark. In terms of critical success and community adoration, I bet it will fair extremely well :). Killzone 3D inbound!

TheMaryCeleste

If Killzone 3 hits 5 million, then it's a gigantic success (for a PlayStation 3 title).

Only halo3 and gears 1 and 2 have passed this mark on the 360 ok buddy

Avatar image for Gamtrix
Gamtrix

804

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#211 Gamtrix
Member since 2010 • 804 Posts
[QUOTE="Eltormo"]

[QUOTE="Sp4rtan_3"]Sorry TC but nothing on the PS3 can match Halo. Reach is going to destroy it in every single way possible.Sp4rtan_3

MMM i see you played both games for start to finish,can you tell of why Halo Reach will destroy KIllzone 3,you know with spoiler tags so those who don't want to know about the story and every thing from both games yet.

I havent played either yet, im just going by how halo 3 destroyed KZ2 so it's natural that Reach will murder KZ3. Idk why people compare the two when Reach is in a hole other ball park then KZ.

KZ2 was a way better game then Halo 3. 90+ MC and best competitive MP.
Avatar image for Anjunaddict
Anjunaddict

4178

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#212 Anjunaddict
Member since 2010 • 4178 Posts

[QUOTE="TheMaryCeleste"]

[QUOTE="Episode_Eve"]

I think the Killzone franchise has a quality that matches the best of the best out there. But becoming a "Halo", "Gran Turismo", or "Call of Duty" takes more than just quality. Marketing and accessibility is what these games do the best (not to take anything away from their quality!).

Killzone 3 could go on to sell millions, but I'm not sure it will sell any more than 5, if it even reaches that mark. In terms of critical success and community adoration, I bet it will fair extremely well :). Killzone 3D inbound!

Zaibach

If Killzone 3 hits 5 million, then it's a gigantic success (for a PlayStation 3 title).

Only halo3 and gears 1 and 2 have passed this mark on the 360 ok buddy

And ODST.
Avatar image for FIipMode
FIipMode

10850

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#213 FIipMode
Member since 2009 • 10850 Posts

[QUOTE="Zaibach"]

[QUOTE="TheMaryCeleste"]

If Killzone 3 hits 5 million, then it's a gigantic success (for a PlayStation 3 title).

Anjunaddict

Only halo3 and gears 1 and 2 have passed this mark on the 360 ok buddy

And ODST.

Has it?

Avatar image for Anjunaddict
Anjunaddict

4178

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#214 Anjunaddict
Member since 2010 • 4178 Posts

[QUOTE="Sp4rtan_3"][QUOTE="Eltormo"]

MMM i see you played both games for start to finish,can you tell of why Halo Reach will destroy KIllzone 3,you know with spoiler tags so those who don't want to know about the story and every thing from both games yet.

Gamtrix

I havent played either yet, im just going by how halo 3 destroyed KZ2 so it's natural that Reach will murder KZ3. Idk why people compare the two when Reach is in a hole other ball park then KZ.

KZ2 was a way better game then Halo 3. 90+ MC and best competitive MP.

Halo 3 has a higher metacritic. Its better.

Avatar image for Anjunaddict
Anjunaddict

4178

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#215 Anjunaddict
Member since 2010 • 4178 Posts

[QUOTE="Anjunaddict"][QUOTE="Zaibach"]Only halo3 and gears 1 and 2 have passed this mark on the 360 ok buddy

FIipMode

And ODST.

Has it?

Not this again :P Im going off vgchartz because i don't know where else to look.

Avatar image for FIipMode
FIipMode

10850

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#216 FIipMode
Member since 2009 • 10850 Posts

[QUOTE="FIipMode"]

[QUOTE="Anjunaddict"] And ODST.Anjunaddict

Has it?

Not this again :P Im going off vgchartz because i don't know where else to look.

Alright then :P

Avatar image for Gamtrix
Gamtrix

804

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#217 Gamtrix
Member since 2010 • 804 Posts

[QUOTE="Gamtrix"][QUOTE="Sp4rtan_3"] I havent played either yet, im just going by how halo 3 destroyed KZ2 so it's natural that Reach will murder KZ3. Idk why people compare the two when Reach is in a hole other ball park then KZ.Anjunaddict

KZ2 was a way better game then Halo 3. 90+ MC and best competitive MP.

Halo 3 has a higher metacritic. Its better.

It's older, KZ is better.
Avatar image for Casboof
Casboof

239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#218 Casboof
Member since 2010 • 239 Posts

[QUOTE="Sp4rtan_3"][QUOTE="Eltormo"]

MMM i see you played both games for start to finish,can you tell of why Halo Reach will destroy KIllzone 3,you know with spoiler tags so those who don't want to know about the story and every thing from both games yet.

Gamtrix

I havent played either yet, im just going by how halo 3 destroyed KZ2 so it's natural that Reach will murder KZ3. Idk why people compare the two when Reach is in a hole other ball park then KZ.

KZ2 was a way better game then Halo 3. 90+ MC and best competitive MP.

Then why isn't it MLG's primary game?

Avatar image for Gamtrix
Gamtrix

804

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#219 Gamtrix
Member since 2010 • 804 Posts

[QUOTE="Gamtrix"][QUOTE="Sp4rtan_3"] I havent played either yet, im just going by how halo 3 destroyed KZ2 so it's natural that Reach will murder KZ3. Idk why people compare the two when Reach is in a hole other ball park then KZ.Casboof

KZ2 was a way better game then Halo 3. 90+ MC and best competitive MP.

Then why isn't it MLG's primary game?

Because Guerilla doesn't sponsor MLG to put KZ2 as it's main game?
Avatar image for Casboof
Casboof

239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#220 Casboof
Member since 2010 • 239 Posts

[QUOTE="Casboof"]

[QUOTE="Gamtrix"]KZ2 was a way better game then Halo 3. 90+ MC and best competitive MP. Gamtrix

Then why isn't it MLG's primary game?

Because Guerilla doesn't sponsor MLG to put KZ2 as it's main game?

Then where do you come off calling it the best competitive MP?

Avatar image for jjccjj92
jjccjj92

641

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#221 jjccjj92
Member since 2010 • 641 Posts

[QUOTE="Sp4rtan_3"][QUOTE="Eltormo"]

MMM i see you played both games for start to finish,can you tell of why Halo Reach will destroy KIllzone 3,you know with spoiler tags so those who don't want to know about the story and every thing from both games yet.

Gamtrix

I havent played either yet, im just going by how halo 3 destroyed KZ2 so it's natural that Reach will murder KZ3. Idk why people compare the two when Reach is in a hole other ball park then KZ.

KZ2 was a way better game then Halo 3. 90+ MC and best competitive MP.

lol, you just said Killzone 2's MP is better than Halo 3's. :lol: :lol: :lol: And just when I thought you couldn't get any more ridiculous. Give it a rest.

Avatar image for TheMaryCeleste
TheMaryCeleste

314

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#222 TheMaryCeleste
Member since 2010 • 314 Posts

[QUOTE="TheMaryCeleste"]

[QUOTE="Episode_Eve"]

I think the Killzone franchise has a quality that matches the best of the best out there. But becoming a "Halo", "Gran Turismo", or "Call of Duty" takes more than just quality. Marketing and accessibility is what these games do the best (not to take anything away from their quality!).

Killzone 3 could go on to sell millions, but I'm not sure it will sell any more than 5, if it even reaches that mark. In terms of critical success and community adoration, I bet it will fair extremely well :). Killzone 3D inbound!

Zaibach

If Killzone 3 hits 5 million, then it's a gigantic success (for a PlayStation 3 title).

Only halo3 and gears 1 and 2 have passed this mark on the 360 ok buddy

I bet ODST, Call of Duty 4, Modern Warfare 2, Grand Theft Auto IV and World at War have, too.

Avatar image for Gamtrix
Gamtrix

804

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#223 Gamtrix
Member since 2010 • 804 Posts

[QUOTE="Gamtrix"][QUOTE="Sp4rtan_3"] I havent played either yet, im just going by how halo 3 destroyed KZ2 so it's natural that Reach will murder KZ3. Idk why people compare the two when Reach is in a hole other ball park then KZ.jjccjj92

KZ2 was a way better game then Halo 3. 90+ MC and best competitive MP.

lol, you just said Killzone 2's MP is better than Halo 3's. :lol: :lol: :lol: And just when I thought you couldn't get any more ridiculous. Give it a rest.

Oh please, KZ2's MP was amazing. Best Map Design this gen, Best Graphics this gen, innovative Warzone mode, Servers, Clan Support, Killzone website full of features. KZ2's MP is way ahead of Halo's.
Avatar image for Casboof
Casboof

239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#224 Casboof
Member since 2010 • 239 Posts

[QUOTE="jjccjj92"]

[QUOTE="Gamtrix"]KZ2 was a way better game then Halo 3. 90+ MC and best competitive MP. Gamtrix

lol, you just said Killzone 2's MP is better than Halo 3's. :lol: :lol: :lol: And just when I thought you couldn't get any more ridiculous. Give it a rest.

Oh please, KZ2's MP was amazing. Best Map Design this gen, Best Graphics this gen, innovative Warzone mode, Servers, Clan Support, Killzone website full of features. KZ2's MP is way ahead of Halo's.

Ok I am not going to argue with an obvious troll anymore.

Avatar image for TheMaryCeleste
TheMaryCeleste

314

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#225 TheMaryCeleste
Member since 2010 • 314 Posts

[QUOTE="jjccjj92"]

[QUOTE="Gamtrix"]KZ2 was a way better game then Halo 3. 90+ MC and best competitive MP. Gamtrix

lol, you just said Killzone 2's MP is better than Halo 3's. :lol: :lol: :lol: And just when I thought you couldn't get any more ridiculous. Give it a rest.

Oh please, KZ2's MP was amazing. Best Map Design this gen, Best Graphics this gen, innovative Warzone mode, Servers, Clan Support, Killzone website full of features. KZ2's MP is way ahead of Halo's.

Killzone 2, in terms of graphics, was trounced by a 2007 game. And its multiplayer is poor, unbalanced and a pure joke compared to Halo 3's, which would explain why people stopped playing it in March 2009.

Avatar image for jjccjj92
jjccjj92

641

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#226 jjccjj92
Member since 2010 • 641 Posts

[QUOTE="Gamtrix"][QUOTE="jjccjj92"]lol, you just said Killzone 2's MP is better than Halo 3's. :lol: :lol: :lol: And just when I thought you couldn't get any more ridiculous. Give it a rest.

Casboof

Oh please, KZ2's MP was amazing. Best Map Design this gen, Best Graphics this gen, innovative Warzone mode, Servers, Clan Support, Killzone website full of features. KZ2's MP is way ahead of Halo's.

Ok I am not going to argue with an obvious troll anymore.

He's a troll alright, I'm just not sure if he's actually self-aware or not. :lol:

Avatar image for Zaibach
Zaibach

13466

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#227 Zaibach
Member since 2007 • 13466 Posts

[QUOTE="Zaibach"]

[QUOTE="TheMaryCeleste"]

If Killzone 3 hits 5 million, then it's a gigantic success (for a PlayStation 3 title).

TheMaryCeleste

Only halo3 and gears 1 and 2 have passed this mark on the 360 ok buddy

I bet ODST, Call of Duty 4, Modern Warfare 2, Grand Theft Auto IV and World at War have, too.

them be some fine multiplats there son, try again next time

Avatar image for Gamtrix
Gamtrix

804

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#228 Gamtrix
Member since 2010 • 804 Posts

[QUOTE="Gamtrix"][QUOTE="jjccjj92"]lol, you just said Killzone 2's MP is better than Halo 3's. :lol: :lol: :lol: And just when I thought you couldn't get any more ridiculous. Give it a rest.

TheMaryCeleste

Oh please, KZ2's MP was amazing. Best Map Design this gen, Best Graphics this gen, innovative Warzone mode, Servers, Clan Support, Killzone website full of features. KZ2's MP is way ahead of Halo's.

Killzone 2, in terms of graphics, was trounced by a 2007 game. And its multiplayer is poor, unbalanced and a pure joke compared to Halo 3's, which would explain why people stopped playing it in March 2009.

Looks better then every 360 game. The MP is > Halo's. Halo is only balanced because it's so generic and simple. They're only adding sprint in Reach? :lol: WOW Classes only now? :lol: Still has ugly graphics? Still no servers? Still playing catchup I see.
Avatar image for Santesyu
Santesyu

4451

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#229 Santesyu
Member since 2008 • 4451 Posts

I am interested in Killzone 3''s MP, since they have changed it to be more COD I am interested in that aspect. Killzone 2 is over hyped I am stuck at the first major boss in the game lol thats going into my trade in list when MOH comes out lol.

Avatar image for monson21502
monson21502

8230

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#230 monson21502
Member since 2009 • 8230 Posts

i think im going to buy halo reach for 360 and kz3 for ps3 instead of getting cod black ops for both systems. i didnt really like kz2 mp but im sure kz3 will be alot better

Avatar image for dark-warmachine
dark-warmachine

3476

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#231 dark-warmachine
Member since 2007 • 3476 Posts

[QUOTE="jjccjj92"]

[QUOTE="Gamtrix"]KZ2 was a way better game then Halo 3. 90+ MC and best competitive MP. Gamtrix

lol, you just said Killzone 2's MP is better than Halo 3's. :lol: :lol: :lol: And just when I thought you couldn't get any more ridiculous. Give it a rest.

Oh please, KZ2's MP was amazing. Best Map Design this gen, Best Graphics this gen, innovative Warzone mode, Servers, Clan Support, Killzone website full of features. KZ2's MP is way ahead of Halo's.

Thefew things I like from this list is Warzone and Clan & Server support but I can't put them above fun Gametypes which was severlylacking in KZ2 compared to Halo3,MW2, and Gears2.They had the standard boring gametype, no creativity/ twist(Gears2), very limited(Halo3/MW2). It's hard to saythis game had a good mp. I'll give them credit for the class system; they were interesting but I honestly believe they could have compressed/merge classes into 3 or 4 well rounded classes. I think they might be taking this approach for K3 or atleast I hope so.

Avatar image for TheMaryCeleste
TheMaryCeleste

314

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#232 TheMaryCeleste
Member since 2010 • 314 Posts

[QUOTE="TheMaryCeleste"]

[QUOTE="Zaibach"]Only halo3 and gears 1 and 2 have passed this mark on the 360 ok buddy

Zaibach

I bet ODST, Call of Duty 4, Modern Warfare 2, Grand Theft Auto IV and World at War have, too.

them be some fine multiplats there son, try again next time

You claimed only three games on the Xbox 360 had sold more than 5 million units, and I proved you dead wrong. Ownage hurts, I know.

No game on the PlayStation 3, perhaps with the exception of Modern Warfare 2, has sold through 5 million units (Prologue's shipped numbers don't count).

Avatar image for HavocV3
HavocV3

8068

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#233 HavocV3
Member since 2009 • 8068 Posts

[QUOTE="TheMaryCeleste"]

[QUOTE="Gamtrix"] Oh please, KZ2's MP was amazing. Best Map Design this gen, Best Graphics this gen, innovative Warzone mode, Servers, Clan Support, Killzone website full of features. KZ2's MP is way ahead of Halo's.Gamtrix

Killzone 2, in terms of graphics, was trounced by a 2007 game. And its multiplayer is poor, unbalanced and a pure joke compared to Halo 3's, which would explain why people stopped playing it in March 2009.

Looks better then every 360 game. The MP is > Halo's. Halo is only balanced because it's so generic and simple. They're only adding sprint in Reach? :lol: WOW Classes only now? :lol: Still has ugly graphics? Still no servers? Still playing catchup I see.

how's that splitscreen/co-op coming along?

by the time Killzone has what Halo CE had back in 2001, Reach will have moved onto campaign matchmaking:lol:

and if KZ's MP was so superior, the staying power of it only manages roughly 1/3 of Halo. and Halo 3 was out over an extra year. can't be that great if it only retains 1/3 as many people as Halo.

Avatar image for TheMaryCeleste
TheMaryCeleste

314

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#234 TheMaryCeleste
Member since 2010 • 314 Posts

[QUOTE="TheMaryCeleste"]

[QUOTE="Gamtrix"] Oh please, KZ2's MP was amazing. Best Map Design this gen, Best Graphics this gen, innovative Warzone mode, Servers, Clan Support, Killzone website full of features. KZ2's MP is way ahead of Halo's.Gamtrix

Killzone 2, in terms of graphics, was trounced by a 2007 game. And its multiplayer is poor, unbalanced and a pure joke compared to Halo 3's, which would explain why people stopped playing it in March 2009.

Looks better then every 360 game. The MP is > Halo's. Halo is only balanced because it's so generic and simple. They're only adding sprint in Reach? :lol: WOW Classes only now? :lol: Still has ugly graphics? Still no servers? Still playing catchup I see.

What's the point in a good-looking game when nobody is playing it?

Avatar image for TheMaryCeleste
TheMaryCeleste

314

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#235 TheMaryCeleste
Member since 2010 • 314 Posts

[QUOTE="Gamtrix"][QUOTE="TheMaryCeleste"]

Killzone 2, in terms of graphics, was trounced by a 2007 game. And its multiplayer is poor, unbalanced and a pure joke compared to Halo 3's, which would explain why people stopped playing it in March 2009.

HavocV3

Looks better then every 360 game. The MP is > Halo's. Halo is only balanced because it's so generic and simple. They're only adding sprint in Reach? :lol: WOW Classes only now? :lol: Still has ugly graphics? Still no servers? Still playing catchup I see.

how's that splitscreen/co-op coming along?

by the time Killzone has what Halo CE had back in 2001, Reach will have moved onto campaign matchmaking:lol:

and if KZ's MP was so superior, the staying power of it only manages roughly 1/3 of Halo. and Halo 3 was out over an extra year. can't be that great if it only retains 1/3 as many people as Halo.

Killzone will never come close to Combat Evolved. That game is one of the greatest ever, on any platform.

Avatar image for jjccjj92
jjccjj92

641

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#236 jjccjj92
Member since 2010 • 641 Posts

[QUOTE="Gamtrix"][QUOTE="TheMaryCeleste"]

Killzone 2, in terms of graphics, was trounced by a 2007 game. And its multiplayer is poor, unbalanced and a pure joke compared to Halo 3's, which would explain why people stopped playing it in March 2009.

HavocV3

Looks better then every 360 game. The MP is > Halo's. Halo is only balanced because it's so generic and simple. They're only adding sprint in Reach? :lol: WOW Classes only now? :lol: Still has ugly graphics? Still no servers? Still playing catchup I see.

how's that splitscreen/co-op coming along?

by the time Killzone has what Halo CE had back in 2001, Reach will have moved onto campaign matchmaking:lol:

and if KZ's MP was so superior, the staying power of it only manages roughly 1/3 of Halo. and Halo 3 was out over an extra year. can't be that great if it only retains 1/3 as many people as Halo.

1/3? Doesn't KZ2 get like 500 players on average nowadays? Whereas Halo 3 is still hitting 150k on a regular basis.

Avatar image for Gamtrix
Gamtrix

804

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#237 Gamtrix
Member since 2010 • 804 Posts

[QUOTE="Gamtrix"][QUOTE="TheMaryCeleste"]

Killzone 2, in terms of graphics, was trounced by a 2007 game. And its multiplayer is poor, unbalanced and a pure joke compared to Halo 3's, which would explain why people stopped playing it in March 2009.

TheMaryCeleste

Looks better then every 360 game. The MP is > Halo's. Halo is only balanced because it's so generic and simple. They're only adding sprint in Reach? :lol: WOW Classes only now? :lol: Still has ugly graphics? Still no servers? Still playing catchup I see.

What's the point in a good-looking game when nobody is playing it?

THere are TONS of full servers up. Beats the hell out of an ugly looking game that's been overmarketed young kids who think they're MLG pros.
Avatar image for TheMaryCeleste
TheMaryCeleste

314

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#238 TheMaryCeleste
Member since 2010 • 314 Posts

[QUOTE="TheMaryCeleste"]

[QUOTE="Gamtrix"] Looks better then every 360 game. The MP is > Halo's. Halo is only balanced because it's so generic and simple. They're only adding sprint in Reach? :lol: WOW Classes only now? :lol: Still has ugly graphics? Still no servers? Still playing catchup I see. Gamtrix

What's the point in a good-looking game when nobody is playing it?

THere are TONS of full servers up. Beats the hell out of an ugly looking game that's been overmarketed young kids who think they're MLG pros.

No, there aren't. Nobody plays that game anymore. Nobody gives a **** about Killzone. Get over it and move on.

Avatar image for Gamtrix
Gamtrix

804

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#239 Gamtrix
Member since 2010 • 804 Posts

[QUOTE="HavocV3"]

[QUOTE="Gamtrix"] Looks better then every 360 game. The MP is > Halo's. Halo is only balanced because it's so generic and simple. They're only adding sprint in Reach? :lol: WOW Classes only now? :lol: Still has ugly graphics? Still no servers? Still playing catchup I see. jjccjj92

how's that splitscreen/co-op coming along?

by the time Killzone has what Halo CE had back in 2001, Reach will have moved onto campaign matchmaking:lol:

and if KZ's MP was so superior, the staying power of it only manages roughly 1/3 of Halo. and Halo 3 was out over an extra year. can't be that great if it only retains 1/3 as many people as Halo.

1/3? Doesn't KZ2 get like 500 players on average nowadays? Whereas Halo 3 is still hitting 150k on a regular basis.

No. THat's way off. That's how much are online in a single region. If you add up all the regions + look at people going on and offline theres a huge community.
Avatar image for Gamtrix
Gamtrix

804

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#240 Gamtrix
Member since 2010 • 804 Posts

[QUOTE="Gamtrix"][QUOTE="TheMaryCeleste"]

What's the point in a good-looking game when nobody is playing it?

TheMaryCeleste

THere are TONS of full servers up. Beats the hell out of an ugly looking game that's been overmarketed young kids who think they're MLG pros.

No, there aren't. Nobody plays that game anymore. Nobody gives a **** about Killzone. Get over it and move on.

Sorry bud, you denial doesn't change the facts. You should actually try playing KZ2, you wouldn't touch Halo ever again.
Avatar image for TheMaryCeleste
TheMaryCeleste

314

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#241 TheMaryCeleste
Member since 2010 • 314 Posts

[QUOTE="jjccjj92"]

[QUOTE="HavocV3"]

how's that splitscreen/co-op coming along?

by the time Killzone has what Halo CE had back in 2001, Reach will have moved onto campaign matchmaking:lol:

and if KZ's MP was so superior, the staying power of it only manages roughly 1/3 of Halo. and Halo 3 was out over an extra year. can't be that great if it only retains 1/3 as many people as Halo.

Gamtrix

1/3? Doesn't KZ2 get like 500 players on average nowadays? Whereas Halo 3 is still hitting 150k on a regular basis.

No. THat's way off. That's how much are online in a single region. If you add up all the regions + look at people going on and offline theres a huge community.

Killzone has a community? :lol:

Avatar image for HavocV3
HavocV3

8068

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#242 HavocV3
Member since 2009 • 8068 Posts

[QUOTE="HavocV3"]

[QUOTE="Gamtrix"] Looks better then every 360 game. The MP is > Halo's. Halo is only balanced because it's so generic and simple. They're only adding sprint in Reach? :lol: WOW Classes only now? :lol: Still has ugly graphics? Still no servers? Still playing catchup I see. jjccjj92

how's that splitscreen/co-op coming along?

by the time Killzone has what Halo CE had back in 2001, Reach will have moved onto campaign matchmaking:lol:

and if KZ's MP was so superior, the staying power of it only manages roughly 1/3 of Halo. and Halo 3 was out over an extra year. can't be that great if it only retains 1/3 as many people as Halo.

1/3? Doesn't KZ2 get like 500 players on average nowadays? Whereas Halo 3 is still hitting 150k on a regular basis.

this is based on ratios. and I even gave Killzone the benefit of the doubt. in my situation it has a 10k player population. Guerrilla's website had displayed activity of 200 active games at one point. which suggests it has around 5k-6k players at a time.

so if it's even less than that, it only makes Killzone's situation look worse than it already is. and your 150k figure is exactly what I put down for Halo 3 to get my estimates, good to see I've got the right idea there;)

Avatar image for johnnyblazed88
johnnyblazed88

4240

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#243 johnnyblazed88
Member since 2008 • 4240 Posts

nope that last one wasnt even close this one would have to make a huge leap in players and popularity

Avatar image for johnnyblazed88
johnnyblazed88

4240

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#244 johnnyblazed88
Member since 2008 • 4240 Posts

[QUOTE="Gamtrix"][QUOTE="jjccjj92"]1/3? Doesn't KZ2 get like 500 players on average nowadays? Whereas Halo 3 is still hitting 150k on a regular basis.

TheMaryCeleste

No. THat's way off. That's how much are online in a single region. If you add up all the regions + look at people going on and offline theres a huge community.

Killzone has a community? :lol:

its definitely not huge prolly under 10k while halo has about 100k at a bad time

Avatar image for Gamtrix
Gamtrix

804

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#245 Gamtrix
Member since 2010 • 804 Posts

It's so lol worthy that 360 fans like high player counts when their games have such small player caps :lol: The 360 can't even handle the play caps of PS3 games.

Avatar image for jjccjj92
jjccjj92

641

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#246 jjccjj92
Member since 2010 • 641 Posts

[QUOTE="jjccjj92"]

[QUOTE="HavocV3"]

how's that splitscreen/co-op coming along?

by the time Killzone has what Halo CE had back in 2001, Reach will have moved onto campaign matchmaking:lol:

and if KZ's MP was so superior, the staying power of it only manages roughly 1/3 of Halo. and Halo 3 was out over an extra year. can't be that great if it only retains 1/3 as many people as Halo.

Gamtrix

1/3? Doesn't KZ2 get like 500 players on average nowadays? Whereas Halo 3 is still hitting 150k on a regular basis.

No. THat's way off. That's how much are online in a single region. If you add up all the regions + look at people going on and offline theres a huge community.

You can't even be unbiased with simple facts. The numbers are out there. Whether or not those are US only numbers, unless the other regions have 20 times that each, the KZ2 community is in no way huge. At all.

Avatar image for TheMaryCeleste
TheMaryCeleste

314

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#247 TheMaryCeleste
Member since 2010 • 314 Posts

[QUOTE="jjccjj92"]

[QUOTE="HavocV3"]

how's that splitscreen/co-op coming along?

by the time Killzone has what Halo CE had back in 2001, Reach will have moved onto campaign matchmaking:lol:

and if KZ's MP was so superior, the staying power of it only manages roughly 1/3 of Halo. and Halo 3 was out over an extra year. can't be that great if it only retains 1/3 as many people as Halo.

HavocV3

1/3? Doesn't KZ2 get like 500 players on average nowadays? Whereas Halo 3 is still hitting 150k on a regular basis.

this is based on ratios. and I even gave Killzone the benefit of the doubt. in my situation it has a 10k player population. Guerrilla's website had displayed activity of 200 active games at one point. which suggests it has around 5k-6k players at a time.

so if it's even less than that, it only makes Killzone's situation look worse than it already is. and your 150k figure is exactly what I put down for Halo 3 to get my estimates, good to see I've got the right idea there;)

According to Bungie, 800,000 unique gamers played Halo 3 last night. Pretty solid for a 2007 game.

I wonder how many unique players have played Killzone 2 the last month?

Avatar image for razgriz_101
razgriz_101

16875

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#248 razgriz_101
Member since 2007 • 16875 Posts

[QUOTE="Gamtrix"][QUOTE="jjccjj92"]1/3? Doesn't KZ2 get like 500 players on average nowadays? Whereas Halo 3 is still hitting 150k on a regular basis.

TheMaryCeleste

No. THat's way off. That's how much are online in a single region. If you add up all the regions + look at people going on and offline theres a huge community.

Killzone has a community? :lol:

it has a smaller more niche community, this doesnt mean it doesnt have one.Music scenes taught me its not bout numbers its bout banding together and having fun first and foremost.

Avatar image for HavocV3
HavocV3

8068

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#249 HavocV3
Member since 2009 • 8068 Posts

[QUOTE="HavocV3"]

[QUOTE="jjccjj92"]1/3? Doesn't KZ2 get like 500 players on average nowadays? Whereas Halo 3 is still hitting 150k on a regular basis.

TheMaryCeleste

this is based on ratios. and I even gave Killzone the benefit of the doubt. in my situation it has a 10k player population. Guerrilla's website had displayed activity of 200 active games at one point. which suggests it has around 5k-6k players at a time.

so if it's even less than that, it only makes Killzone's situation look worse than it already is. and your 150k figure is exactly what I put down for Halo 3 to get my estimates, good to see I've got the right idea there;)

According to Bungie, 800,000 unique gamers played Halo 3 last night. Pretty solid for a 2007 game.

I wonder how many unique players have played Killzone 2 the last month?

I'm not going to bother with those figures, I don't think Guerilla even provides them.

Avatar image for dark-warmachine
dark-warmachine

3476

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#250 dark-warmachine
Member since 2007 • 3476 Posts

[QUOTE="TheMaryCeleste"]

[QUOTE="Gamtrix"] Oh please, KZ2's MP was amazing. Best Map Design this gen, Best Graphics this gen, innovative Warzone mode, Servers, Clan Support, Killzone website full of features. KZ2's MP is way ahead of Halo's.Gamtrix

Killzone 2, in terms of graphics, was trounced by a 2007 game. And its multiplayer is poor, unbalanced and a pure joke compared to Halo 3's, which would explain why people stopped playing it in March 2009.

Looks better then every 360 game. The MP is > Halo's. Halo is only balanced because it's so generic and simple. They're only adding sprint in Reach? :lol: WOW Classes only now? :lol: Still has ugly graphics? Still no servers? Still playing catchup I see.

I have to agree atleast in terms of game mechanic; they were toooo tedious and for that reason,I never liked the Halo Series.Not being able to sprint, cook grenadesand too some extent prone, imho anyway, really turned me off from the series, but I always give it credit in terms of community features on consoles. It has most games beat that areaeven tho that isn't a priority to me personally.