Killzone: Shadow Fall 1080p gameplay video.

[QUOTE="PhazonBlazer"]

I came here expecting Crysis 3 pics. I am disappoint.

GotNugz

thread title clearly says killzone 4:?

I was just expecting hermits to post Crysis 3 pics because they're really insecure about their PCs :P

Ok now I can actually tell that it looks pretty good. With Gametrailers butt footage and whatnot it was just sort of hinted at.
Plays back real framey though. Maybe that's just me.
Noticed this is a different playthrough.

Keep in mind, this was made with only 4GB of RAM available. Sony changed it to 8GB last minute. This looks amazing and it's just a launch title, can't wait to see what devs can pull off 1 year into its release.

 

Here's an extremely high-res screenshot: http://blogs-images.forbes.com/erikkain/files/2013/02/KZ4_Chase1.jpg

XVision84

And completely pointless. The game runs at 1080p by GG's own mouth, why post a 3840x2160 shot? 

[QUOTE="ShadowDeathX"][QUOTE="XVision84"]

Keep in mind, this was made with only 4GB of RAM available. Sony changed it to 8GB last minute. This looks amazing and it's just a launch title, can't wait to see what devs can pull off 1 year into its release.

 

Here's an extremely high-res screenshot: http://blogs-images.forbes.com/erikkain/files/2013/02/KZ4_Chase1.jpg

XVision84

Maybe screenshot wasn't the right word :P.

But that is how the game will end up looking in the end, the hardware pretty much confirms it.

The hardware confirms that it will run at 1080p not a ridiculously high resolution. Also I would put money on the game not looking the same as that by launch.

Framerate dips and terrible gameplay.

Looks great, but console devs have a pretty bad tendency to show something they can't really deliver. The final game usually has downgraded graphics, and those "huge" levels end up being just a non-interactive gimmick.

It would be really great that new KZ actually looks like that. It would represent a great future where console games could get and finally catch up with PC games. For a little while at least.

[QUOTE="XVision84"]

[QUOTE="ShadowDeathX"] Lol 3840 x 2160 "Screenshot"seanmcloughlin

Maybe screenshot wasn't the right word :P.

But that is how the game will end up looking in the end, the hardware pretty much confirms it.

The hardware confirms that it will run at 1080p not a ridiculously high resolution. Also I would put money on the game not looking the same as that by launch.

Man, I know it won't run at 4K Res. Just saying it will be really sharp. We'll see how the game looks by launch, but definitely early next gen I expect graphics like that. Sony took a pretty big jump forward with the specs, what do you guys still expect PS3 graphics? :P

I posted a really high res image because the other ones were all blurry stream feeds. If you find a sharp 1080p screenshot, I'd be glad to edit it in.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CH_F5a_Qbj0

while there is no denying Crysis 3 looks phenominal on high settings, and i know all the techno mubo jumbo aa, deffered rendering, antistropic filter,etc. at the end of the day i use my eyeballs and as far as i can tell KZ shadow fall looks just as good as crysis 3 ultra. it shouldnt surprise anyone remember it's not rendering at 2560x1600 it is 1920x1080

[QUOTE="seanmcloughlin"]

[QUOTE="XVision84"]

Maybe screenshot wasn't the right word :P.

But that is how the game will end up looking in the end, the hardware pretty much confirms it.

XVision84

The hardware confirms that it will run at 1080p not a ridiculously high resolution. Also I would put money on the game not looking the same as that by launch.

Man, I know it won't run at 4K Res. Just saying it will be really sharp. We'll see how the game looks by launch, but definitely early next gen I expect graphics like that. Sony took a pretty big jump forward with the specs, what do you guys still expect PS3 graphics? :P

I posted a really high res image because the other ones were all blurry stream feeds. If you find a sharp 1080p screenshot, I'd be glad to edit it in.

Well if that game does look like that then it's promising for next gen. But it's way too early to tell.

Everything sounds good on paper and Sony talk a big game, but they did with the PS3 too and it didn't do any of what they promised

I have no idea what the debate is about, do some people sole existence is to disclaim everything 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CH_F5a_Qbj0

while there is no denying Crysis 3 looks phenominal on high settings, and i know all the techno mubo jumbo aa, deffered rendering, antistropic filter,etc. at the end of the day i use my eyeballs and as far as i can tell KZ shadow fall looks just as good as crysis 3 ultra. it shouldnt surprise anyone remember it's not rendering at 2560x1600 it is 1920x1080

GotNugz

Well I think C3 looks pretty damn amazing. It's all in the little details

What I saw in that KZ video didn't come close to what's here. 

[QUOTE="XVision84"]

[QUOTE="seanmcloughlin"]

The hardware confirms that it will run at 1080p not a ridiculously high resolution. Also I would put money on the game not looking the same as that by launch.

seanmcloughlin

Man, I know it won't run at 4K Res. Just saying it will be really sharp. We'll see how the game looks by launch, but definitely early next gen I expect graphics like that. Sony took a pretty big jump forward with the specs, what do you guys still expect PS3 graphics? :P

I posted a really high res image because the other ones were all blurry stream feeds. If you find a sharp 1080p screenshot, I'd be glad to edit it in.

Well if that game does look like that then it's promising for next gen. But it's way too early to tell.

Everything sounds good on paper and Sony talk a big game, but they did with the PS3 too and it didn't do any of what they promised

That's because PS3 had a very distinct architecture, and it had a pretty average GPU (at the time), and it had that split memory pool (not to mention the mere 256mb of RAM for games).

This has no such problems, Sony learned a lot from PS3.

the "on rails" parts look great i.e. when he first flies in, lands and walks onto the tower before the explosion  and then when he jumps onto the helicopter, grabs the rope and flies through the towers ... that is where you can see the great art direction and scale of the backdrops.

However the actual run and shoot parts, the parts where you actually interact with the art assets, looked pretty much standard run of the mill fare to me. Certainly nothing that crash hot visually there.

Looking forward to seeing more of the game itself to see if there is more to it other than pretty backdrops and normal FPS graphics - Still nice to see something on consoles that will actually run at native 1080p resolution at a decent frame rate.

[QUOTE="seanmcloughlin"]

[QUOTE="XVision84"]

Man, I know it won't run at 4K Res. Just saying it will be really sharp. We'll see how the game looks by launch, but definitely early next gen I expect graphics like that. Sony took a pretty big jump forward with the specs, what do you guys still expect PS3 graphics? :P

 

I posted a really high res image because the other ones were all blurry stream feeds. If you find a sharp 1080p screenshot, I'd be glad to edit it in.

XVision84

Well if that game does look like that then it's promising for next gen. But it's way too early to tell.

Everything sounds good on paper and Sony talk a big game, but they did with the PS3 too and it didn't do any of what they promised

That's because PS3 had a very distinct architecture, and it had a pretty average GPU (at the time), and it had that split memory pool (not to mention the mere 256mb of RAM for games).

This has no such problems, Sony learned a lot from PS3.

I'm glad they went for a more PC centric type of architecture. Not only will it make games far easier to develop for the system but the multiplats will be much more improved across all platforms and PC won't be getting such gimped versions anymore 

Looks great, but console devs have a pretty bad tendency to show something they can't really deliver. The final game usually has downgraded graphics, and those "huge" levels end up being just a non-interactive gimmick.

It would be really great that new KZ actually looks like that. It would represent a great future where console games could get and finally catch up with PC games. For a little while at least.

IgGy621985

The ps4 looks like its going to be a beast, that said it will never touch the pc you delusional fanboys need to get a clue. The pc is alwayse going to get upgraded, the ps4/720 will be locked with the hardware they are launched with, you will never win. People are so fkn dense.

this is gonna be my 1st ps4 game HOLY F*** the graphix are gonna be INSANE!!!!!!

That vid is a big improvment on the others I've seen but it's nothing that the PC hasn't been doing for years.

BF3 on Ultra is far better

Witcher 2 maxed is better

Metro Last Light will bag it

Crysis 3 maxed leaves pretty much everything that has come before spitting dust

Massive leap from PS360 but nothing that hasn't already been done better.

That vid is a big improvment on the others I've seen but it's nothing that the PC hasn't been doing for years.

BF3 on Ultra is far better

Witcher 2 maxed is better

Metro Last Light will bag it

Crysis 3 maxed leaves pretty much everything that has come before spitting dust

Massive leap from PS360 but nothing that hasn't already been done better.

GarGx1

[QUOTE="GarGx1"]

That vid is a big improvment on the others I've seen but it's nothing that the PC hasn't been doing for years.

BF3 on Ultra is far better

Witcher 2 maxed is better

Metro Last Light will bag it

Crysis 3 maxed leaves pretty much everything that has come before spitting dust

Massive leap from PS360 but nothing that hasn't already been done better.

emgesp

Did you not see the pics posted above? Or are you just ignoring them? Also have you seen Crysis 3 maxed out in front of you rather than screens and youtube videos? 

[QUOTE="emgesp"][QUOTE="GarGx1"]

That vid is a big improvment on the others I've seen but it's nothing that the PC hasn't been doing for years.

BF3 on Ultra is far better

Witcher 2 maxed is better

Metro Last Light will bag it

Crysis 3 maxed leaves pretty much everything that has come before spitting dust

Massive leap from PS360 but nothing that hasn't already been done better.

seanmcloughlin

Did you not see the pics posted above? Or are you just ignoring them? Also have you seen Crysis 3 maxed out in front of you rather than screens and youtube videos? 

wasn't the next-gen leap we were all expecting, but still looks good.

can't touch crysis 3 though. :(

KarateeeChop

For a unfinished game on newly devloped hardware it looks damn good. I predict we will see much more awesome things from PS4 in the years to come that make this look old.

[QUOTE="emgesp"][QUOTE="GarGx1"]

That vid is a big improvment on the others I've seen but it's nothing that the PC hasn't been doing for years.

BF3 on Ultra is far better

Witcher 2 maxed is better

Metro Last Light will bag it

Crysis 3 maxed leaves pretty much everything that has come before spitting dust

Massive leap from PS360 but nothing that hasn't already been done better.

seanmcloughlin

Did you not see the pics posted above? Or are you just ignoring them? Also have you seen Crysis 3 maxed out in front of you rather than screens and youtube videos? 

That vid is a big improvment on the others I've seen but it's nothing that the PC hasn't been doing for years.

BF3 on Ultra is far better

Witcher 2 maxed is better

Metro Last Light will bag it

Crysis 3 maxed leaves pretty much everything that has come before spitting dust

Massive leap from PS360 but nothing that hasn't already been done better.

GarGx1

BF3 is corridor console shooter targeted for DX9 killzone looks better

metro doesn't even look that good on ultra

crysis 3 while gorgeous is still built around last gen consoles no matter what the devs say, they can't magically make the pc game inherintly different

this is also alpha footage running on new dev kit that only had 4GB of ram, the draw distance alone is better than anything you mentioned, while it is not explorable those buildings and cars and water are all being rendered.

[QUOTE="seanmcloughlin"]

[QUOTE="emgesp"] Crysis 3 looks really good, but it's not a massive leap from what we are seeing from Pre-Alpha footage of Killzone 4. emgesp

Did you not see the pics posted above? Or are you just ignoring them? Also have you seen Crysis 3 maxed out in front of you rather than screens and youtube videos? 

Um no :? I didn't mention that post at all. because it's stupid and flawed. Why are you suddenly bringing that up and dodging my question? 

wasn't the next-gen leap we were all expecting, but still looks good.

can't touch crysis 3 though. :(

KarateeeChop

[QUOTE="seanmcloughlin"]

[QUOTE="emgesp"] Crysis 3 looks really good, but it's not a massive leap from what we are seeing from Pre-Alpha footage of Killzone 4. hoosier7

Did you not see the pics posted above? Or are you just ignoring them? Also have you seen Crysis 3 maxed out in front of you rather than screens and youtube videos? 

No because I have nothing else to go off, but the thing is I can play Crysis 3 exactly like what the shots posted look like right now. I don't need to wait 8 months. 

Also games have always gotten slightly worse visuals wise between their initial showings and their final product, it's happened with countless games and this will be no different. Not to mention that it was all smoke and mirrors, giving you a fake sense of scale while hindering you to a tiny play area. Crysis 3 is actually somewhat explorable and much much larger

I thought graphics didn't matter!?

[QUOTE="emgesp"]

[QUOTE="seanmcloughlin"]

Did you not see the pics posted above? Or are you just ignoring them? Also have you seen Crysis 3 maxed out in front of you rather than screens and youtube videos? 

seanmcloughlin

Um no :? I didn't mention that post at all. because it's stupid and flawed. Why are you suddenly bringing that up and dodging my question? 

[QUOTE="KarateeeChop"]

wasn't the next-gen leap we were all expecting, but still looks good.

can't touch crysis 3 though. :(

jman1553

Same, I was expecting a lot less.

Though some people round ehre make it sound like it was a LOT more than what it was. but Cows gonna cow and all that

still waiting on theat list of pc exclusives that will blow away ps4/720 games. let's be honest the big budget games will be multiplat or console exclusive

Doom 4

next RE

Rage 2

cod

BF4

nothing against hermits but they should be happy that next gen consoles won't be as weak as WiiU, because that would hurt them aswell. let's all just laugh at the sheep.

[QUOTE="seanmcloughlin"]

[QUOTE="emgesp"] Are you talking about the pictures comparing 1080p direct capture shots of one of the main characters in Crysis 3 against a zoomed in compressed 720p still of an NPC in Killzone 4? I wouldn't call that a fair comparison. 

emgesp

Um no :? I didn't mention that post at all. because it's stupid and flawed. Why are you suddenly bringing that up and dodging my question? 

Wow someone is a master at dodging questions and trying to change the subject. Yeah not worth my time talking to you, you just ignore everything I post conveniently

[QUOTE="IgGy621985"]

Looks great, but console devs have a pretty bad tendency to show something they can't really deliver. The final game usually has downgraded graphics, and those "huge" levels end up being just a non-interactive gimmick.

It would be really great that new KZ actually looks like that. It would represent a great future where console games could get and finally catch up with PC games. For a little while at least.

GotNugz

I'm saying that those huge levels we saw in that KZ SF demo most likely won't be interactive. You surely won't be able to freely jump around wherever you want. You will get a scripted guide, like it was shown in the demo.

E.g. on this screenshot in Crysis 3 you can get from this position where the dude is currently standing, and to that skyscrapper far away with graphics quality that suprasses KZ SF.

Or here. You WILL be able to get to any location in ARMA 3 if you want with visual quality that surpasses KZ SF. And this is not exactly one of the best ARMA 3 screens I could find. I'm too lazy to find better.

But - if you can do that in KZ SF also - great. I'll be very happy because we can only imagine how sandbox games like GTA will look in future.

still waiting on theat list of pc exclusives that will blow away ps4/720 games. let's be honest the big budget games will be multiplat or console exclusive

Doom 4

next RE

Rage 2

cod

BF4

nothing against hermits but they should be happy that next gen consoles won't be as weak as WiiU, because that would hurt them aswell. let's all just laugh at the sheep.

GotNugz

On what visuals or gameplay? Also you're very naive if you think all the big budget games will be multiplat or console exclusive

[QUOTE="seanmcloughlin"]

[QUOTE="emgesp"] Crysis 3 looks really good, but it's not a massive leap from what we are seeing from Pre-Alpha footage of Killzone 4. emgesp

Did you not see the pics posted above? Or are you just ignoring them? Also have you seen Crysis 3 maxed out in front of you rather than screens and youtube videos? 

[QUOTE="GotNugz"]

[QUOTE="IgGy621985"]

Looks great, but console devs have a pretty bad tendency to show something they can't really deliver. The final game usually has downgraded graphics, and those "huge" levels end up being just a non-interactive gimmick.

It would be really great that new KZ actually looks like that. It would represent a great future where console games could get and finally catch up with PC games. For a little while at least.

IgGy621985

I'm saying that those huge levels we saw in that KZ SF demo most likely won't be interactive. You surely won't be able to freely jump around wherever you want. You will get a scripted guide, like it was shown in the demo.

E.g. on this screenshot in Crysis 3 you can get from this position where the dude is currently standing, and to that skyscrapper far away with graphics quality that suprasses KZ SF.

Or here. You WILL be able to get to any location in ARMA 3 if you want with visual quality that surpasses KZ SF. And this is not exactly one of the best ARMA 3 screens I could find. I'm too lazy to find better.

But - if you can do that in KZ SF also - great. I'll be very happy because we can only imagine how sandbox games like GTA will look in future.

I'm certain that Star Citizen and Project Awakened will also be some massive games that rival or look much better than Killzone

I'm certain that Star Citizen and Project Awakened will also be some massive games that rival or look much better than Killzone

NoodleFighter

Yeah, Star Citizen looks incredible, but Project Awakened, nah, not so much. Or perhaps I don't see the greatness behind it. And yeah, I know it will be a UE4 game which was prototyped on UE3, but still... it's way too "Infamous" and "Prototype" which are yesterday news.

 

I'm certain that Star Citizen and Project Awakened will also be some massive games that rival or look much better than Killzone

NoodleFighter

Project awakened looks like ass 

Star Citizen is where it's at

[QUOTE="GotNugz"]

still waiting on theat list of pc exclusives that will blow away ps4/720 games. let's be honest the big budget games will be multiplat or console exclusive

Doom 4

next RE

Rage 2

cod

BF4

nothing against hermits but they should be happy that next gen consoles won't be as weak as WiiU, because that would hurt them aswell. let's all just laugh at the sheep.

NoodleFighter

On what visuals or gameplay? Also you're very naive if you think all the big budget games will be multiplat or console exclusive

i'm not saying all will but most of them will it's the only way to recoup their money they invested. look at all the high end games last gen most of them were multiplat. RE5 had a huge budget aswell as 6, even crysis coultn't resist going multiplat but to be honest the console versions were subpar. and gameplay wise you can't compare a pc with a m/kb and third party gamepads to Wiimote, dualshock 4, 360 pad, Kinect, or wiiu gamepad. not to say all of those are good but pc doesn't have anything like those.

Nice...

[QUOTE="KarateeeChop"]

wasn't the next-gen leap we were all expecting, but still looks good.

can't touch crysis 3 though. :(

emgesp

[QUOTE="XVision84"]

Keep in mind, this was made with only 4GB of RAM available. Sony changed it to 8GB last minute. This looks amazing and it's just a launch title, can't wait to see what devs can pull off 1 year into its release.

 

Here's an extremely high-res screenshot: http://blogs-images.forbes.com/erikkain/files/2013/02/KZ4_Chase1.jpg

topgunmv

The textures will certainly get a lot better.

[QUOTE="NoodleFighter"]

 

I'm certain that Star Citizen and Project Awakened will also be some massive games that rival or look much better than Killzone

seanmcloughlin

Project awakened looks like ass 

Star Citizen is where it's at

UE3 prototype footage, and it looks pretty good to me, they also seem to ultilize a lot of features most devs didn't bother with in UE3 like the water reacting to physics, destructable environments that break apart piece by piece etc.

How hermits can say Crysis 3 looks better than this is beyond me

inb4shots

How hermits can say Crysis 3 looks better than this is beyond me

inb4shots

Vatusus

Shots were in way before you :roll: 

How hermits can say Crysis 3 looks better than this is beyond me

inb4shots

Vatusus

Well, Castle Crashers, LIMBO and Super Meat Boy won't give you that answer. Actually playing Crysis 3 will.