Killz-Owned the 360 Graphically AGAIN (Hard Proof)

[QUOTE="NanoMan88"]

[QUOTE="spartan-kratos"] You are showing signs of getting Killz-Owned Brings up sales, gameplay over graphics, etc. Yup you just got Killz-Ownedspartan-kratos

Wait if PC games look better than Killzone 3 does that mean killz-owned got killz-owned? paradox

These console threads make me smile, like two cripples arguing who's wheel chair is superior when there is a third party who can walk but they choose to ignore him.

Wait so why doesn't it count for the PC? Is it cause basically every game on the PC that's a FPS looks better than Flopzone 3?

Digital Foundry:

"While the gameplay delivered, core gamers spoiled by the cutting-edge graphical techniques seen in titles like Killzone 2 really wanted to see what a next-generation Bungie game could deliver. Halo: Reach is that game, an enormous technical leap over its predecessors and competitors on 360 and an exciting example of a first-party exclusive that genuinely pushes the console into new technological territory - something we don't see so often on the Microsoft platform."

Stevo_the_gamer

Games Radar:

"KZ3, with its relentless gunfights and ridiculous set-pieces, easily outshines Reach's comparatively so-so campaign, and looks a hell of a lot prettier in the process."

Edit: Uhuh, let me try it.. pls let me: KILLZOWNED. Nice. 8)

You are showing signs of getting Killz-Owned Brings up sales, gameplay over graphics, etc. Yup you just got Killz-Ownedspartan-kratos

Wait if PC games look better than Killzone 3 does that mean killz-owned got killz-owned? paradox

These console threads make me smile, like two cripples arguing who's wheel chair is superior when there is a third party who can walk but they choose to ignore him.

[QUOTE="johny300"][QUOTE="Funconsole"] Thanks for replying bud. I think I'll just pick up GeOW 1 used tho :)

Funconsole

Lol in my country everything is available early :P, i got a chance to buy KZ3 but didn't have enough money so i got the gears triple pack and KZ2 :), i think you can get gears triple pack on Amazon :).

this thread is about graphics since a lot of lems were saying how crysis 2 would be the console graphics king and it showed that the 360 could put out games that were equal to the ps3'sbest looking games. they were wrong and TC just wanted to rub that in...similiar to how if crysis 2 looked better lems wouldve made threads about how 360 could have the best looking games and ps3 wasnt more powerful. well guess what, another one bites the dust. if you remember after kz2, it was supposed to be a 360 game that would take console graphics king since it used to cycle(360-->ps3-->360-->ps3) but nothing after geow2. its ok though, at least kz3 flopped. 8.5 makes a **** game especially when most of us are buying it for its SINGLE player......

[QUOTE="Stevo_the_gamer"]

Digital Foundry:

"While the gameplay delivered, core gamers spoiled by the cutting-edge graphical techniques seen in titles like Killzone 2 really wanted to see what a next-generation Bungie game could deliver. Halo: Reach is that game, an enormous technical leap over its predecessors and competitors on 360 and an exciting example of a first-party exclusive that genuinely pushes the console into new technological territory - something we don't see so often on the Microsoft platform."

Games Radar:

"KZ3, with its relentless gunfights and ridiculous set-pieces, easily outshines Reach's comparatively so-so campaign, and looks a hell of a lot prettier in the process."

Edit: Uhuh, let me try it.. pls let me: KILLZOWNED. Nice. 8)

[QUOTE="spartan-kratos"][QUOTE="Ironbash"]

A beta is the final edition of the game with bugs you do realise?

Ironbash

Unlike you, I have something called friends and a life

Still not able to reply huh? How terribly sad :roll:

Besides read and weep, killzone 3 may have effects botched all over it, but Crysis 2 is using technology killzone 3 can never comprehend

HDR
---- C2: High quality
---- U2: Filmic, high quality, not as adaptive
---- K3: Not adaptive, ok quality

- Bloom
---- C2: High quality, filmic bloom
---- U2: Good quality
---- K3: Good quality, partially faked

- Lens flares
---- C2: High quality, multiple lens flares
---- U2: non-existent
---- K3: High quality, limited numbers

- Depth of field
---- C2: Extreme quality, actual Bokeh effects
---- U2: High quality, extremely polished
---- K3: Good quality

- Volumetric light scattering
---- C2: Good quality
---- U2: non-existent
---- K3: non-existent

- Area lighting
---- C2: Trilinear sampling from irradiance volume, extreme quality
---- U2: Light probes, high quality
---- K3: Light probes, high quality

- Global illumination
---- C2: light propagation via reflective shadow mapping, single bounce, extreme quality
---- U2: non-existent, pre-baked
---- K3: non-existent, pre-baked

- SSAO
---- C2: Ok quality
---- U2: Ok quality
---- K3: Ok quality

- SSGI
---- C2: Good quality
---- U2: non-existent
---- K3: non-existent

- Anti-Aliasing
---- C2: Temporal + Edge Blur, good quality in motion, bad quality in pictures
---- U2: MSAA, great quality overall
---- K3: MLAA, decent quality in motion, great quality in pictures

Go back to your pathetic fail of an attempt at a battlfield copy

Cows bragging about their inferior graphics again.:P

Games Radar:

"KZ3, with its relentless gunfights and ridiculous set-pieces, easily outshines Reach's comparatively so-so campaign, and looks a hell of a lot prettier in the process."

BlbecekBobecek

By SW standards it still flopped

Not to mention Reach is superior in every way except graphics

Its amazing when consolites are obsessed with which system has better graphics yet the PC owns all of them.... If you want good graphics, build a freakin pc, and quit trying to make a console sound like the king of graphics.

The Side Effects of getting Killz-Owned have been very apparent on this thread -New Identified Side Effect of getting Killz-Owned = Cuss words Killz-Ownedspartan-kratos

Crysis 2 looks way better actually, there is no comparisson

Its amazing when consolites are obsessed with which system has better graphics yet the PC owns all of them.... If you want good graphics, build a freakin pc, and quit trying to make a console sound like the king of graphics.

epac_shred90

[QUOTE="WilliamRLBaker"] which one flopped? which one sold more, has more players, had about 20X the kills in its beta? lolStevo_the_gamer

""Games Radar: "KZ3, with its relentless gunfights and ridiculous set-pieces, easily outshines Reach's comparatively so-so campaign, and looks a hell of a lot prettier in the process." "

Thats not about graphics. As for that it doesn't matter I will keep using it against Cows whom laud Killzone 3. they promised AAA *AAAA at one time actually* and it didn't deliver, I will continue to bring up the fact that it flopped.

Crysis 2 looks way better actually, there is no comparisson

Creator_Of_All

[QUOTE="Creator_Of_All"]

Crysis 2 looks way better actually, there is no comparisson

BigBoss255

[QUOTE="BigBoss255"][QUOTE="Creator_Of_All"]

Crysis 2 looks way better actually, there is no comparisson

romans828_2002

Both Black Ops and Halo outscored and outsold Flopzone 3. :lol:

Poor Flopzone.

The Side Effects of getting Killz-Owned have been very apparent on this thread -New Identified Side Effect of getting Killz-Owned = Cuss words Killz-Ownedspartan-kratos

Allow me to correct you:

Flopz-owned. 8.5.

:lol::lol:

To be fair though, Killzone 2 and 3 have very good graphics, even compared to a lot of PC games out there.shakmaster13

360 has no answers for Killzone 3 graphically that's for sure.

[QUOTE="BigBoss255"][QUOTE="Creator_Of_All"]

Crysis 2 looks way better actually, there is no comparisson

romans828_2002

[QUOTE="shakmaster13"]To be fair though, Killzone 2 and 3 have very good graphics, even compared to a lot of PC games out there.TheOtherTheoG

But the point is that Crysis 2 looks miles better, there is nothing to compare really, everything is leaps beyond in Crysis 2, epsecially the lighting

[QUOTE="Masculus"]

It still flopped, lol.

spartan-kratos

Graphical flops? How so?

I agree that Splinter Cell looks average but you would be surprised with how good Alan Wake and Halo Reach look! Also Crysis 2 wasnt released yet and everything shown so far indicate it has a chance to deliver ;)

[QUOTE="TheOtherTheoG"][QUOTE="shakmaster13"]To be fair though, Killzone 2 and 3 have very good graphics, even compared to a lot of PC games out there.Creator_Of_All

But the point is that Crysis 2 looks miles better, there is nothing to compare really, everything is leaps beyond in Crysis 2, epsecially the lighting

[QUOTE="SHR3DD3D"]

Both Black Ops and Halo outscored and outsold Flopzone 3. :lol:

Poor Flopzone.

spartan-kratos

Flopz-owned.

8.5-ned.

:lol:

Well, I dun agree with the AA score that was given to KZ3, since the game fixed many issues with the first game that was AAA with all its flaws !!!!!

Regardless, I am getting the game, I am very hyped for it.

To be fair though, Killzone 2 and 3 have very good graphics, even compared to a lot of PC games out there.shakmaster13

Uh no unless it is a old game on a dust bunny pc. Oh how is a 8.5 a flop not many games score higher. not even 2 points from a perfect score. Also the reviewer got side tracked by the story and it lost .5 points there or it would have been a 9 easy. I don't get the people here do all they play is 9 reated games as ranked by gamespot ??

[QUOTE="15strong"]

[QUOTE="rybe1025"]8.5VensInferno

Still better than a ..... Uh, There must be a game to compare it to.

lol, good one.

Funny how this thread is about Graphics, but no one dares bring up Graphics, instead they change the subject to scores, sales, CODspartan-kratos

What the heck is this? LMAO :lol:

You mad brah? Seriously that's the vibe I'm getting from you. Do you feel that threatened about a game that is also coming to the PS3? You make no sense.

"No one dares bring up graphics"

I'll be happy to..

1. The LoT article is comparing a retail game to a multiplayer beta, which Crytek already said was an old build of the game. Hardly conclusive.

2. Both games look great and neither of these games are owning the other one. So you saying things like "killzowned" makes you look silly.

3. C2 (360) still beats KZ3 graphically. Crytek has this photorealistic look about their graphics which looks fantastic. On top of that while KZ3 looks great, surprisingly I find the graphics to be a bit inconsistent sometimes (Refer to point 4.)

4. KZ3 has some great looking gun models and lighting but in all honesty it has this weird look about it and others have also mentioned this that some of the structures/polygons almost look like they are moving or breaking up (most notably the edges) when you stand still and look around for a bit. Also there are some areas where the textures look great (mostly up close character and gun models) and other areas where they look a bit weak (some portions of the environment).

Think I'm crazy? Well my friend take a look at the "hard proof" taken straight from the horses mouth, the same site that you are using to claim ownage with :lol:

Digital foundary on the AA in KZ3:

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-vs-killzone-3?page=1

"It's fair to say that there is both good and bad. On the jungle campaign stage, the results are absolutely phenomenal: uncannily good in fact, with virtually no edge-aliasing issues. The MLAA post-processing works beautifully in adding to the organic feel of the level. However, on the more industrial stages, the hard edges and something akin to a specular sheen producesapixel-crawling effect that is not ideal." Based on vids shown of C2 and my time spent in the 360 beta I didn't see any such effect which I myself have seen in the KZ3 SP and MP games and I must say it looks nasty. Digital Foundary saying that the effect is "not ideal" is an understatement and them being nice :lol:

LMAO if you continue reading they start talking about KZ2 and how that game virtually has no AA issues :lol: So it looks like you killzowned yourself from the very site you're trying to claim ownage with :lol::lol: I love it! :lol: Sure they say the game is a step above KZ2 but it's not perfect and nowhere did they say it is graphically better than C2 for you to say "hard proof Killzowned". If anything you're the one that Killzowned yourself based on some of the comments made about the AA in KZ3.

5. This video in 720p is enough for me to say that C2 beats Killzone 3.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lr5lrgHqhIs

That is all :)

[QUOTE="VensInferno"]

[QUOTE="15strong"]

Still better than a ..... Uh, There must be a game to compare it to.

themyth01

lol, good one.

Flopzone 3, at least better than Gran Flopismo 5. :lol:

[QUOTE="spartan-kratos"]Funny how this thread is about Graphics, but no one dares bring up Graphics, instead they change the subject to scores, sales, CODT-razor1

What the heck is this? LMAO :lol:

You mad brah? Seriously that's the vibe I'm getting from you. Do you feel that threatened about a game that is also coming to the PS3? You make no sense.

"No one dares bring up graphics"

I'll be happy to..

1. The LoT article is comparing a retail game to a multiplayer beta, which Crytek already said was an old build of the game. Hardly conclusive.

2. Both games look great and neither of these games are owning the other one. So you saying things like "killzowned" makes you look silly.

3. C2 (360) still beats KZ3 graphically. Crytek has this photorealistic look about their graphics which looks fantastic. On top of that while KZ3 looks great, surprisingly I find the graphics to be a bit inconsistent sometimes (Refer to point 4.)

4. KZ3 has some great looking gun models and lighting but in all honesty it has this weird look about it and others have also mentioned this that some of the structures/polygons almost look like they are moving or breaking up (most notably the edges) when you stand still and look around for a bit. Also there are some areas where the textures look great (mostly up close character and gun models) and other areas where they look a bit weak (some portions of the environment).

Think I'm crazy? Well my friend take a look at the "hard proof" taken straight from the horses mouth, the same site that you are using to claim ownage with :lol:

Digital foundary on the AA in KZ3:

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-vs-killzone-3?page=1

"It's fair to say that there is both good and bad. On the jungle campaign stage, the results are absolutely phenomenal: uncannily good in fact, with virtually no edge-aliasing issues. The MLAA post-processing works beautifully in adding to the organic feel of the level. However, on the more industrial stages, the hard edges and something akin to a specular sheen producesapixel-crawling effect that is not ideal." Based on vids shown of C2 and my time spent in the 360 beta I didn't see any such effect which I myself have seen in the KZ3 SP and MP games and I must say it looks nasty. Digital Foundary saying that the effect is "not ideal" is an understatement and them being nice :lol:

LMAO if you continue reading they start talking about KZ2 and how that game virtually has no AA issues :lol: So it looks like you killzowned yourself from the very site you're trying to claim ownage with :lol::lol: I love it! :lol: Sure they say the game is a step above KZ2 but it's not perfect and nowhere did they say it is graphically better than C2 for you to say "hard proof Killzowned". If anything you're the one that Killzowned yourself based on some of the comments made about the AA in KZ3.

5. This video in 720p is enough for me to say that C2 beats Killzone 3.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lr5lrgHqhIs

That is all :)

Man, spartan-kratos has been owned! :o

[QUOTE="spartan-kratos"][QUOTE="NanoMan88"]

Wait if PC games look better than Killzone 3 does that mean killz-owned got killz-owned? paradox

These console threads make me smile, like two cripples arguing who's wheel chair is superior when there is a third party who can walk but they choose to ignore him.

NanoMan88

Oh so its only a console thing, essentially not mattering at all?

[QUOTE="VensInferno"]

[QUOTE="15strong"]

Still better than a ..... Uh, There must be a game to compare it to.

themyth01

lol, good one.

[QUOTE="VensInferno"]

[QUOTE="SoraX64"] I'm curious, who exactly is getting "Killz-Owned"?theuncharted34

:lol: wow.

When Killz-Owned..... -resort to other games -resort to PC -starts cussing -b..B...b...b.....But Killzone has no gameplay -resort to scores/ sales Yup Killz-Ownedspartan-kratos

When your game flops immensely...

...the enemy has been...

...FLOPZ-OWNED!

:lol:

Keep them coming!

[QUOTE="epac_shred90"]

Its amazing when consolites are obsessed with which system has better graphics yet the PC owns all of them.... If you want good graphics, build a freakin pc, and quit trying to make a console sound like the king of graphics.

MFDOOM1983

Haha, well you could plug it up to ur tv and use a gamepad, although a gamepad for FPS on a PC is epic amounts of fail (for multiplayer anywayz) ;)

[QUOTE="spartan-kratos"]Funny how this thread is about Graphics, but no one dares bring up Graphics, instead they change the subject to scores, sales, CODT-razor1

What the heck is this? LMAO :lol:

You mad brah? Seriously that's the vibe I'm getting from you. Do you feel that threatened about a game that is also coming to the PS3? You make no sense.

"No one dares bring up graphics"

I'll be happy to..

1. The LoT article is comparing a retail game to a multiplayer beta, which Crytek already said was an old build of the game. Hardly conclusive.

2. Both games look great and neither of these games are owning the other one. So you saying things like "killzowned" makes you look silly.

3. C2 (360) still beats KZ3 graphically. Crytek has this photorealistic look about their graphics which looks fantastic. On top of that while KZ3 looks great, surprisingly I find the graphics to be a bit inconsistent sometimes (Refer to point 4.)

4. KZ3 has some great looking gun models and lighting but in all honesty it has this weird look about it and others have also mentioned this that some of the structures/polygons almost look like they are moving or breaking up (most notably the edges) when you stand still and look around for a bit. Also there are some areas where the textures look great (mostly up close character and gun models) and other areas where they look a bit weak (some portions of the environment).

Think I'm crazy? Well my friend take a look at the "hard proof" taken straight from the horses mouth, the same site that you are using to claim ownage with :lol:

Digital foundary on the AA in KZ3:

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-vs-killzone-3?page=1

"It's fair to say that there is both good and bad. On the jungle campaign stage, the results are absolutely phenomenal: uncannily good in fact, with virtually no edge-aliasing issues. The MLAA post-processing works beautifully in adding to the organic feel of the level. However, on the more industrial stages, the hard edges and something akin to a specular sheen producesapixel-crawling effect that is not ideal." Based on vids shown of C2 and my time spent in the 360 beta I didn't see any such effect which I myself have seen in the KZ3 SP and MP games and I must say it looks nasty. Digital Foundary saying that the effect is "not ideal" is an understatement and them being nice :lol:

LMAO if you continue reading they start talking about KZ2 and how that game virtually has no AA issues :lol: So it looks like you killzowned yourself from the very site you're trying to claim ownage with :lol::lol: I love it! :lol: Sure they say the game is a step above KZ2 but it's not perfect and nowhere did they say it is graphically better than C2 for you to say "hard proof Killzowned". If anything you're the one that Killzowned yourself based on some of the comments made about the AA in KZ3.

5. This video in 720p is enough for me to say that C2 beats Killzone 3.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lr5lrgHqhIs

That is all :)

[QUOTE="spartan-kratos"]When Killz-Owned..... -resort to other games -resort to PC -starts cussing -b..B...b...b.....But Killzone has no gameplay -resort to scores/ sales Yup Killz-OwnedSHR3DD3D

When your game flops immensely...

...the enemy has been...

...FLOPZ-OWNED!

:lol:

Keep them coming!

[QUOTE="T-razor1"]

[QUOTE="spartan-kratos"]Funny how this thread is about Graphics, but no one dares bring up Graphics, instead they change the subject to scores, sales, CODomho88

What the heck is this? LMAO :lol:

You mad brah? Seriously that's the vibe I'm getting from you. Do you feel that threatened about a game that is also coming to the PS3? You make no sense.

"No one dares bring up graphics"

I'll be happy to..

1. The LoT article is comparing a retail game to a multiplayer beta, which Crytek already said was an old build of the game. Hardly conclusive.

2. Both games look great and neither of these games are owning the other one. So you saying things like "killzowned" makes you look silly.

3. C2 (360) still beats KZ3 graphically. Crytek has this photorealistic look about their graphics which looks fantastic. On top of that while KZ3 looks great, surprisingly I find the graphics to be a bit inconsistent sometimes (Refer to point 4.)

4. KZ3 has some great looking gun models and lighting but in all honesty it has this weird look about it and others have also mentioned this that some of the structures/polygons almost look like they are moving or breaking up (most notably the edges) when you stand still and look around for a bit. Also there are some areas where the textures look great (mostly up close character and gun models) and other areas where they look a bit weak (some portions of the environment).

Think I'm crazy? Well my friend take a look at the "hard proof" taken straight from the horses mouth, the same site that you are using to claim ownage with :lol:

Digital foundary on the AA in KZ3:

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-vs-killzone-3?page=1

"It's fair to say that there is both good and bad. On the jungle campaign stage, the results are absolutely phenomenal: uncannily good in fact, with virtually no edge-aliasing issues. The MLAA post-processing works beautifully in adding to the organic feel of the level. However, on the more industrial stages, the hard edges and something akin to a specular sheen producesapixel-crawling effect that is not ideal." Based on vids shown of C2 and my time spent in the 360 beta I didn't see any such effect which I myself have seen in the KZ3 SP and MP games and I must say it looks nasty. Digital Foundary saying that the effect is "not ideal" is an understatement and them being nice :lol:

LMAO if you continue reading they start talking about KZ2 and how that game virtually has no AA issues :lol: So it looks like you killzowned yourself from the very site you're trying to claim ownage with :lol::lol: I love it! :lol: Sure they say the game is a step above KZ2 but it's not perfect and nowhere did they say it is graphically better than C2 for you to say "hard proof Killzowned". If anything you're the one that Killzowned yourself based on some of the comments made about the AA in KZ3.

5. This video in 720p is enough for me to say that C2 beats Killzone 3.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lr5lrgHqhIs

That is all :)