KZ2, console graphics king...Really?

[QUOTE="Filthybastrd"]

Textures textures textures blablabla.

MortalDecay

[QUOTE="LOLDFRTGERGDMIK"]

eye's tell the truth, the teeth on killzone2 models look like 2d paper cut out sprites lolMr_Apple_Soup

THE TEETH?

THE....TEETH?

well guys, there you have it, GeoW2 has better teeth then KZ2, not better textures, better lighting, better graphics...better teeth

this thread is getting a bit...stupid now...the general agreement is that KZ2 has better graphics...cant we just move on, or do we really need a 300+ post thread on this EVERY OTHER DAY?...

...the teeth :x

[QUOTE="Mr_Apple_Soup"]

[QUOTE="LOLDFRTGERGDMIK"]

eye's tell the truth, the teeth on killzone2 models look like 2d paper cut out sprites lolgodofwarrocksux

THE TEETH?

THE....TEETH?

well guys, there you have it, GeoW2 has better teeth then KZ2, not better textures, better lighting, better graphics...better teeth

this thread is getting a bit...stupid now...the general agreement is that KZ2 has better graphics...cant we just move on, or do we really need a 300+ post thread on this EVERY OTHER DAY?...

...the teeth :x

Got a link to that aswell? How long does it take you to start a new acct when you are doing it so consistently? Must take a while.

a link from where? the human eye can see gears of war has more normal mapping/parallax/bump maps. the textures have more depth the models have more depth. Full support for seamlessly interconnected indoor and outdoor environments with dynamic per-pixel lighting and shadowing supported everywhere http://www.unrealtechnology.com/features.php?ref=rendering Detailed character lighting, using spherical harmonics to composite the light environment and support large numbers of affecting lights at near constant rendering cost. Advanced shadowing, providing full support for four shadowing techniques: Dynamic stencil shadow volumes supporting fully dynamic, moving light sources casting accurate shadows on all objects in the scene. Dynamic characters casting dynamic soft shadows on the scene using projected shadow buffers. Multiple shadow filtering methods are supported including uniform PCF, jittered PCF and VSM. Filtering methods support varying quality settings and are optimized to take advantage of platform-specific features. lol in other words, gears of war lighting could of all been dynamic, but not all lightsources are because it was design choice.godofwarrocksux

Well unless you have actual evidence, you're point is moot at best.

In fact all of your points never seem to b based on fact, but on what you see personally. Which doesn't necessarily make it right.

are you kidding???? big rigs looks better than anything out atm!!! get real sons

lmfao :P

[QUOTE="godofwarrocksux"]a link from where? the human eye can see gears of war has more normal mapping/parallax/bump maps. the textures have more depth the models have more depth. Full support for seamlessly interconnected indoor and outdoor environments with dynamic per-pixel lighting and shadowing supported everywhere http://www.unrealtechnology.com/features.php?ref=rendering Detailed character lighting, using spherical harmonics to composite the light environment and support large numbers of affecting lights at near constant rendering cost. Advanced shadowing, providing full support for four shadowing techniques: Dynamic stencil shadow volumes supporting fully dynamic, moving light sources casting accurate shadows on all objects in the scene. Dynamic characters casting dynamic soft shadows on the scene using projected shadow buffers. Multiple shadow filtering methods are supported including uniform PCF, jittered PCF and VSM. Filtering methods support varying quality settings and are optimized to take advantage of platform-specific features. lol in other words, gears of war lighting could of all been dynamic, but not all lightsources are because it was design choice.-Traveller-

Well unless you have actual evidence, you're point is moot at best.

In fact all of your points never seem to b based on fact, but on what you see personally. Which doesn't necessarily make it right.

[QUOTE="-Traveller-"]

[QUOTE="godofwarrocksux"]a link from where? the human eye can see gears of war has more normal mapping/parallax/bump maps. the textures have more depth the models have more depth. Full support for seamlessly interconnected indoor and outdoor environments with dynamic per-pixel lighting and shadowing supported everywhere http://www.unrealtechnology.com/features.php?ref=rendering Detailed character lighting, using spherical harmonics to composite the light environment and support large numbers of affecting lights at near constant rendering cost. Advanced shadowing, providing full support for four shadowing techniques: Dynamic stencil shadow volumes supporting fully dynamic, moving light sources casting accurate shadows on all objects in the scene. Dynamic characters casting dynamic soft shadows on the scene using projected shadow buffers. Multiple shadow filtering methods are supported including uniform PCF, jittered PCF and VSM. Filtering methods support varying quality settings and are optimized to take advantage of platform-specific features. lol in other words, gears of war lighting could of all been dynamic, but not all lightsources are because it was design choice.primatefac3

Well unless you have actual evidence, you're point is moot at best.

In fact all of your points never seem to b based on fact, but on what you see personally. Which doesn't necessarily make it right.

Why do you keep posting to pictures, you're not proving anything to me. All it shows is that Gears graphics are good. Yet not better than Killzone 2. Anyways you were fun for about 2 seconds of convo, but i'm gona leave this alone now.

[QUOTE="waynehead895"]Opinion. There will never be a graphics king because no one will ever agree on what looks best. jerkface96

You could have not said it any better.

[QUOTE="primatefac3"][QUOTE="-Traveller-"]

Well unless you have actual evidence, you're point is moot at best.

In fact all of your points never seem to b based on fact, but on what you see personally. Which doesn't necessarily make it right.

-Traveller-

Why do you keep posting to pictures, you're not proving anything to me. All it shows is that Gears graphics are good. Yet not better than Killzone 2. Anyways you were fun for about 2 seconds of convo, but i'm gona leave this alone now.

[QUOTE="killzowned24"][QUOTE="gearspwnflopzon"]gears of war 3 all lights fully dynamic FTW LOLDFRTGERGDMIK

Gears vs Killzone.

These threads are becoming boring.

So, you'd be happy if games still looked like Star Fox on the SNES...MortalDecay

oh and in no way cod5 has more things going on-screen than KZ2. That alone shows that you haven't played KZ2 :lol:

[QUOTE="LOLDFRTGERGDMIK"][QUOTE="killzowned24"] LOL, keep dreaming because Epic was just hyping better static lighting as a new feature.ronvalencia

Theres really little difference between KZ2/RE5/GEOW2 and anyone that says other wise cannot be anything short of blind. Whichever has graphics king is a rather little victory because it's only scrapped past.

[QUOTE="gearspwnflopzon"][QUOTE="Nonstop-Madness"]KZ2 doesn't have the best character models but everything else is the best. Uncharted 1 has better character models than KZ2 and Gears 2. Nonstop-Madness

art style owns technicallity, just look at fable 2, beautiful.sts106mat

Actually Fable 2 own KZ2 in lighting, with REAL dynamic shadowed volumetric lighting, vastly bigger world and scale, and of course forests and details beyond anything in KZ2 barren worlds

And of course 50 NPCs around with real AI, than just going from A to B shooting