Leaked Information About Gran Turismo 5 (56k)

I'm not sure if anyone outside of GB will understand what the Top Gear test track is but all my friends who want this are hyped just for that track, me includedhoosier7

At the moment the Top Gear test track is the only reason why I care about this game. If there are crappy Volvo estates in it then that's another reason.

Cars have detail, the tracks arn't a strongpoint.Tobin09

Car models in GT5 are the best Iv'e seen. Hopefully the environment graphics are still placeholders.Marka1700

I am a fan of the gt and forza series but really when I want to play a proper sim the name SIMBIN comes to mind 1st.

[QUOTE="Tobin09"]Cars have detail, the tracks arn't a strongpoint.Rikusaki

Car models in GT5 are the best Iv'e seen. Hopefully the environment graphics are still placeholders.Marka1700

omg i cant wait and i dont feel like buying GT5P now cuz i just got spoiled by this info and i also need a good raceing whell if anone has any sugestions. and y is it that the same person posts some new GT5 info every time lol :P

box0rocks

Buying the game for the Top Gear track alone. Well, not really... I'm just so hyped that I can freaking go around the infamous Gambon's corner. I wonder if they will put the Suzuki Liana and the Chevy Lacetti into the game? Odd cars to request but I WANT THEM.CosbyOwnsStuff

Be interesting to see if anyone can legit beat the Stigs time of 1.44.4 in the Liana without cheating and cutting corners etc. I wonder if we'll have the option to turn the rain on/off too just to make things more interesting??

Cars have detail, the tracks arn't a strongpoint.Tobin09

Wow... no wonder its taken so long to make the damn game. The only track you need is the Nurburgring. It covers basically every kind of corner you can find on a race track.

NeoGAF is claiming BS on these rumors. Rikusaki owned again. :lol:

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=360881

ferrarimanf355

[QUOTE="ferrarimanf355"]

NeoGAF is claiming BS on these rumors. Rikusaki owned again. :lol:

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=360881

Generalmojo

Hey, I'm skeptic, too, about those claims.

*opens rant*

I don't want a gazillion tracks! I want better car physics! Damage! REAL CAR SOUNDS (at least)! Forza does these for me.

I really want GT5, but at the minute the Top Gear test track is the only reason that makes me want to buy it.

*ends rant*

*opens rant*

I don't want a gazillion tracks! I want better car physics! Damage! REAL CAR SOUNDS (at least)! Forza does these for me.

I really want GT5, but at the minute the Top Gear test track is the only reason that makes me want to buy it.

*ends rant*

che5ter666

I would rather have more tracks. Better physics and damage won't increase the replay value at all. Besides, I love what Polyphony is doing with the physics engine. It just makes the cars simply fun to drive.Rikusaki

[QUOTE="che5ter666"]

*opens rant*

I don't want a gazillion tracks! I want better car physics! Damage! REAL CAR SOUNDS (at least)! Forza does these for me.

I really want GT5, but at the minute the Top Gear test track is the only reason that makes me want to buy it.

*ends rant*

Rikusaki

Uh, what? You'd rather have a boatload of tracks than good gameplay mechanics? Okay... :|

And to the dude who reported me, that was not trolling. Just because I offended you by being skeptical of a RUMOR... sheesh...

[QUOTE="che5ter666"]

*opens rant*

I don't want a gazillion tracks! I want better car physics! Damage! REAL CAR SOUNDS (at least)! Forza does these for me.

I really want GT5, but at the minute the Top Gear test track is the only reason that makes me want to buy it.

*ends rant*

Rikusaki

I completely disagree with you...... Ironically.... because of the two values you find no importance in I have well over 700 hours in FM2.....

GT5 could have 1000 tracks and I would not care if the model stays the same as GT5P.....Different tracks will not replace the hollow feeling I get when I play GT5P......it's redundant..... mindless lap turning...and IMO shatters any replay value.....

[QUOTE="Rikusaki"][QUOTE="che5ter666"]

*opens rant*

I don't want a gazillion tracks! I want better car physics! Damage! REAL CAR SOUNDS (at least)! Forza does these for me.

I really want GT5, but at the minute the Top Gear test track is the only reason that makes me want to buy it.

*ends rant*

ferrarimanf355

Uh, what? You'd rather have a boatload of tracks than good gameplay mechanics? Okay... :|

And to the dude who reported me, that was not trolling. Just because I offended you by being skeptical of a RUMOR... sheesh...

[QUOTE="Rikusaki"][QUOTE="che5ter666"]

*opens rant*

I don't want a gazillion tracks! I want better car physics! Damage! REAL CAR SOUNDS (at least)! Forza does these for me.

I really want GT5, but at the minute the Top Gear test track is the only reason that makes me want to buy it.

*ends rant*

masiisam

I completely disagree with you...... Ironically.... because of the two values you find no importance in I have well over 700 hours in FM2.....

GT5 could have 1000 tracks and I would not care if the model stays the same as GT5P.....Different tracks will not replace the hollow feeling I get when I play GT5P......it's redundant..... mindless lap turning...and IMO shatters any replay value.....

Iwas hoping for some news about damage, but aslong as they fix the online its should be a solid game.

[QUOTE="thrillh0"]

Will all those tracks have trees that are really x's?

PBSnipes

[QUOTE="FirstDiscovery"]2D backgrounds = EPIC FAIL GT is a jokeurdead18

Damage =/= Better Gameplay Rikusaki

[QUOTE="ferrarimanf355"]

[QUOTE="Rikusaki"] I would rather have more tracks. Better physics and damage won't increase the replay value at all. Besides, I love what Polyphony is doing with the physics engine. It just makes the cars simply fun to drive.Rikusaki

Uh, what? You'd rather have a boatload of tracks than good gameplay mechanics? Okay... :|

And to the dude who reported me, that was not trolling. Just because I offended you by being skeptical of a RUMOR... sheesh...

[QUOTE="urdead18"][QUOTE="FirstDiscovery"]2D backgrounds = EPIC FAIL GT is a jokepaullywog

[QUOTE="masiisam"]

[QUOTE="Rikusaki"] I would rather have more tracks. Better physics and damage won't increase the replay value at all. Besides, I love what Polyphony is doing with the physics engine. It just makes the cars simply fun to drive.Rikusaki

I completely disagree with you...... Ironically.... because of the two values you find no importance in I have well over 700 hours in FM2.....

GT5 could have 1000 tracks and I would not care if the model stays the same as GT5P.....Different tracks will not replace the hollow feeling I get when I play GT5P......it's redundant..... mindless lap turning...and IMO shatters any replay value.....

I have....

What does "Have you played GT4?"have to do with what I said?:?

Phew! I was just about to not get this game but then I saw Grand Canyon at the bottom as a confirmed track (best track ever in GT4 graphics were amazing should look supurb in GT5)!