Leave it to Sony to make Rumble a BIG annoucement.

  • 81 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for -Ninja_Dog-
-Ninja_Dog-

4197

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 -Ninja_Dog-
Member since 2005 • 4197 Posts

Sony is just sad.

I was going to by a PS3 this year.

But I guess I'll wait till early 2009.

Don't get me wrong, rumble is good to have, but why are all the cows excited for what they called "last gen tech" when it was first annouced that the PS3 would nothave rumble.

Sony should just stick with TV/s and Surround sound systems.Leasve the gaming to MS and Nintendo.

Avatar image for apolloluke
apolloluke

1273

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#2 apolloluke
Member since 2006 • 1273 Posts
Sony surround sound systems SUCK.
Avatar image for CJL13
CJL13

19137

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#3 CJL13
Member since 2005 • 19137 Posts
So you're gonna wait because they made it a big announcement?
Avatar image for Magical_Zebra
Magical_Zebra

7960

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#4 Magical_Zebra
Member since 2003 • 7960 Posts
Its just sad...... :shock:
Avatar image for Heith
Heith

1231

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Heith
Member since 2003 • 1231 Posts
Yeah, at this point there is no reason to own a PS3. It's not even the cheapest Blu-Ray player anymore.
Avatar image for MasterC5
MasterC5

2932

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 MasterC5
Member since 2006 • 2932 Posts
it is kinda sad but im glad when I finally get one I can play mgs4 with rumble!
Avatar image for Ragnarok1051
Ragnarok1051

20238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Ragnarok1051
Member since 2007 • 20238 Posts

Sony is just sad.

I was going to by a PS3 this year.

But I guess I'll wait till early 2009.

Don't get me wrong, rumble is good to have, but why are all the cows excited for what they called "last gen tech" when it was first annouced that the PS3 would nothave rumble.

Sony should just stick with TV/s and Surround sound systems.Leasve the gaming to MS and Nintendo.

-Ninja_Dog-

Leave gaming to M$ and Nintendo? Did you forget what Song did with PS1 and 2?

Avatar image for Kaosed
Kaosed

3409

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Kaosed
Member since 2006 • 3409 Posts

sony: rumble is teh sux and teh old!1

1 year later

sony:ps3 to heva rumble!

sony is either retarded, or thinks WE are retarded

Avatar image for tbone29
tbone29

5552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 tbone29
Member since 2004 • 5552 Posts

Well, when PS3 haters made a big deal out of the PS3 having no rumble, what did you expect?

Not to mention, if Sony supports it, of course the Cows will make it seem like a huge announcement.

Avatar image for -Ninja_Dog-
-Ninja_Dog-

4197

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 -Ninja_Dog-
Member since 2005 • 4197 Posts

So you're gonna wait because they made it a big announcement?CJL13

Its just sad they didn't have some real annoucements.

Plus it should have a price drop by then. I hope.

Avatar image for Heith
Heith

1231

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 Heith
Member since 2003 • 1231 Posts
haha, great, Sony had a lousy keynote so now the PS3 sucks againR-Dot-Yung
No company leaves a big announcement out of their Keynote Speaches.. dont expect anything groundbreaking..
Avatar image for -Ninja_Dog-
-Ninja_Dog-

4197

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 -Ninja_Dog-
Member since 2005 • 4197 Posts

it is kinda sad but im glad when I finally get one I can play mgs4 with rumble!MasterC5

When does MGS4 come out in the U.S. ?

Avatar image for Dualshockin
Dualshockin

7826

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 Dualshockin
Member since 2006 • 7826 Posts

Sony is just sad.

I was going to by a PS3 this year.

But I guess I'll wait till early 2009.

Don't get me wrong, rumble is good to have, but why are all the cows excited for what they called "last gen tech" when it was first annouced that the PS3 would nothave rumble.

Sony should just stick with TV/s and Surround sound systems.Leasve the gaming to MS and Nintendo.

-Ninja_Dog-
Not only is your flame-bait lacking that Fanboy finish,it is also quite inaccurate: A rumble enabled Ps3 controller is not a surprise to all of us.
Avatar image for Ragnarok1051
Ragnarok1051

20238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 Ragnarok1051
Member since 2007 • 20238 Posts

[QUOTE="R-Dot-Yung"]haha, great, Sony had a lousy keynote so now the PS3 sucks againHeith
No company leaves a big announcement out of their Keynote Speaches.. dont expect anything groundbreaking..

Yeah because we all know TGS is officially over :roll:

Avatar image for -Ninja_Dog-
-Ninja_Dog-

4197

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 -Ninja_Dog-
Member since 2005 • 4197 Posts

Sony surround sound systems SUCK.apolloluke

...ok...then T.V's and cameras or something.

Avatar image for Magical_Zebra
Magical_Zebra

7960

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#18 Magical_Zebra
Member since 2003 • 7960 Posts
Yeah, at this point there is no reason to own a PS3. It's not even the cheapest Blu-Ray player anymore.Heith
And that was the defense for alot of people. "bu bu bu its teh cheapest blu ray player!" :shock:
Avatar image for ff7isnumbaone
ff7isnumbaone

5352

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#19 ff7isnumbaone
Member since 2005 • 5352 Posts
I like the way sheeps and lemmings act like they were just born this gen. LoL sony should just leave gaming to MS and nintendo.....
Avatar image for MasterC5
MasterC5

2932

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 MasterC5
Member since 2006 • 2932 Posts

[QUOTE="MasterC5"]it is kinda sad but im glad when I finally get one I can play mgs4 with rumble!-Ninja_Dog-

When does MGS4 come out in the U.S. ?

I hear early 2008

Avatar image for berzerk0912
berzerk0912

961

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 berzerk0912
Member since 2006 • 961 Posts
Milk those cows!! Yeee Haaaw!!
Avatar image for Eurobacca
Eurobacca

619

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 Eurobacca
Member since 2007 • 619 Posts
Afrika looks exciting!
Avatar image for -Ninja_Dog-
-Ninja_Dog-

4197

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 -Ninja_Dog-
Member since 2005 • 4197 Posts
[QUOTE="-Ninja_Dog-"]

Sony is just sad.

I was going to by a PS3 this year.

But I guess I'll wait till early 2009.

Don't get me wrong, rumble is good to have, but why are all the cows excited for what they called "last gen tech" when it was first annouced that the PS3 would nothave rumble.

Sony should just stick with TV/s and Surround sound systems.Leasve the gaming to MS and Nintendo.

Dualshockin

Not only is your flame-bait lacking that Fanboy finish,it is also quite inaccurate: A rumble enabled Ps3 controller is not a surprise to all of us.

Flame-bait?

w/e

So why does Sony make it seem like a big deal.

Avatar image for themyth01
themyth01

13924

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#24 themyth01
Member since 2003 • 13924 Posts
Well at least they needed something to offset the home delay.
Avatar image for Dualshockin
Dualshockin

7826

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 Dualshockin
Member since 2006 • 7826 Posts
[QUOTE="Dualshockin"][QUOTE="-Ninja_Dog-"]

Sony is just sad.

I was going to by a PS3 this year.

But I guess I'll wait till early 2009.

Don't get me wrong, rumble is good to have, but why are all the cows excited for what they called "last gen tech" when it was first annouced that the PS3 would nothave rumble.

Sony should just stick with TV/s and Surround sound systems.Leasve the gaming to MS and Nintendo.

-Ninja_Dog-

Not only is your flame-bait lacking that Fanboy finish,it is also quite inaccurate: A rumble enabled Ps3 controller is not a surprise to all of us.

Flame-bait?

w/e

So why does Sony make it seem like a big deal.

Yes,flame-bait. Are Sony truly making it seem like a big deal or are gamers making it a big deal?This is the question.
Avatar image for The_Ish
The_Ish

13913

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#26 The_Ish
Member since 2006 • 13913 Posts

[QUOTE="Heith"]Yeah, at this point there is no reason to own a PS3. It's not even the cheapest Blu-Ray player anymore.Magical_Zebra
And that was the defense for alot of people. "bu bu bu its teh cheapest blu ray player!" :shock:

Wait...it's not anymore?

Oh well...at least there is FFXIII and MGS4 and White Knight Story to look forward too...

Avatar image for -Ninja_Dog-
-Ninja_Dog-

4197

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 -Ninja_Dog-
Member since 2005 • 4197 Posts
[QUOTE="-Ninja_Dog-"]

[QUOTE="MasterC5"]it is kinda sad but im glad when I finally get one I can play mgs4 with rumble!MasterC5

When does MGS4 come out in the U.S. ?

I hear early 2008

Will the DS3 be out by then in the U.S.?

Avatar image for The_Ish
The_Ish

13913

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#28 The_Ish
Member since 2006 • 13913 Posts

Yes,flame-bait. Are Sony truly making it seem like a big deal or are gamers making it a big deal?This is the question.Dualshockin

Sony is making a big deal.

Thats the answer.

Avatar image for -Ninja_Dog-
-Ninja_Dog-

4197

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 -Ninja_Dog-
Member since 2005 • 4197 Posts

Well at least they needed something to offset the home delay. themyth01

More waiting for the cows.

Avatar image for Dualshockin
Dualshockin

7826

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 Dualshockin
Member since 2006 • 7826 Posts

[QUOTE="Dualshockin"]Yes,flame-bait. Are Sony truly making it seem like a big deal or are gamers making it a big deal?This is the question.The_Ish

Sony is making a big deal.

Thats the answer.

I see. When did Kaz Hirai join GameSpot.
Avatar image for G10mgs4
G10mgs4

1490

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 G10mgs4
Member since 2007 • 1490 Posts
when was it a big annoucement, all they said was that rumble was back in the controllers and moved on?
Avatar image for valmonte
valmonte

736

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#32 valmonte
Member since 2005 • 736 Posts
[QUOTE="-Ninja_Dog-"]

Sony is just sad.

I was going to by a PS3 this year.

But I guess I'll wait till early 2009.

Don't get me wrong, rumble is good to have, but why are all the cows excited for what they called "last gen tech" when it was first annouced that the PS3 would nothave rumble.

Sony should just stick with TV/s and Surround sound systems.Leasve the gaming to MS and Nintendo.

Ragnarok1051

Leave gaming to M$ and Nintendo? Did you forget what Song did with PS1 and 2?

Sure didn't. What does that have to do with PS3? Are we to let nostalgia take the place of common sense? Personally, I'm glad to hear DMC4 will have rumble function. But the fact remains that the TC has a point.

It's long been shrugged off by Cows that rumble was unneccessary for the PS3 experience. And that's utter horses***. It was a mistake! Everyone makes them! Sony's been making more then it's share lately! I like Sony. I think in the end they will pull their ass out of the fire and rally the PS3 with a fuller library and another price cut or two.

But Sony's original stance of "Rumble being unneccessary" was ridiculous. And the fact it was supported by so many was ridiculous and further disingenuous. Sony was mired in legal issues with the original Dualshock, so of course they were putting a positive spin on a bad situation. But what excuse do the consumers who backed this utterly stupid contention have? As best I can come up with, it was blatant and insincere damage control. So, while I'm pleased Sony's figured out how to get their rumble situation back on course, the twonks who supported that lame excuse should be ready to suffer a little ribbing over it.

Avatar image for Ragnarok1051
Ragnarok1051

20238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 Ragnarok1051
Member since 2007 • 20238 Posts

[QUOTE="Dualshockin"]Yes,flame-bait. Are Sony truly making it seem like a big deal or are gamers making it a big deal?This is the question.The_Ish

Sony is making a big deal.

Thats the answer.

They made the announcement and moved on, yall are the ones making such a fuss about it.

Avatar image for Ragnarok1051
Ragnarok1051

20238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 Ragnarok1051
Member since 2007 • 20238 Posts
[QUOTE="Ragnarok1051"][QUOTE="-Ninja_Dog-"]

Sony is just sad.

I was going to by a PS3 this year.

But I guess I'll wait till early 2009.

Don't get me wrong, rumble is good to have, but why are all the cows excited for what they called "last gen tech" when it was first annouced that the PS3 would nothave rumble.

Sony should just stick with TV/s and Surround sound systems.Leasve the gaming to MS and Nintendo.

valmonte

Leave gaming to M$ and Nintendo? Did you forget what Song did with PS1 and 2?

Sure didn't. What does that have to do with PS3? Are we to let nostalgia take the place of common sense? Personally, I'm glad to hear DMC4 will have rumble function. But the fact remains that the TC has a point.

It's long been shrugged off by Cows that rumble was unneccessary for the PS3 experience. And that's utter horses***. It was a mistake! Everyone makes them! Sony's been making more then it's share lately! I like Sony. I think in the end they will pull their ass out of the fire and rally the PS3 with a fuller library and another price cut or two.

But Sony's original stance of "Rumble being unneccessary" was ridiculous. And the fact it was supported by so many was ridiculous and further disingenuous. Sony was mired in legal issues with the original Dualshock, so of course they were putting a positive spin on a bad situation. But what excuse do the consumers who backed this utterly stupid contention have? As best I can come up with, it was blatant and insincere damage control. So, while I'm pleased Sony's figured out how to get their rumble situation back on course, the twonks who supported that lame excuse should be ready to suffer a little ribbing over it.

Sony tried to get away with a statement and they didn't, they got called on it and now are answering back. And yet there is hate still coming back to them.

Avatar image for The_Ish
The_Ish

13913

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#35 The_Ish
Member since 2006 • 13913 Posts
[QUOTE="The_Ish"]

[QUOTE="Dualshockin"]Yes,flame-bait. Are Sony truly making it seem like a big deal or are gamers making it a big deal?This is the question.Ragnarok1051

Sony is making a big deal.

Thats the answer.

They made the announcement and moved on, yall are the ones making such a fuss about it.

Exactly, they made the anouncement... if they don't plan on making it a big deal they wouldn't have given it it's own anouncement at TGS.

Avatar image for Dualshockin
Dualshockin

7826

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 Dualshockin
Member since 2006 • 7826 Posts
when was it a big annoucement, all they said was that rumble was back in the controllers and moved on?G10mgs4
It's always a big announcement for the competition,seeing as how it is bad news for them.
Avatar image for Ragnarok1051
Ragnarok1051

20238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 Ragnarok1051
Member since 2007 • 20238 Posts
[QUOTE="Ragnarok1051"][QUOTE="The_Ish"]

[QUOTE="Dualshockin"]Yes,flame-bait. Are Sony truly making it seem like a big deal or are gamers making it a big deal?This is the question.The_Ish

Sony is making a big deal.

Thats the answer.

They made the announcement and moved on, yall are the ones making such a fuss about it.

Exactly, they made the anouncement... if they don't plan on making it a big deal they wouldn't have given it it's own anouncement at TGS.

It really wasn't made out to big that big, they knew people like us would do that for them.

Avatar image for Dualshockin
Dualshockin

7826

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 Dualshockin
Member since 2006 • 7826 Posts
Exactly, they made the anouncement... if they don't plan on making it a big deal they wouldn't have given it it's own anouncement at TGS.The_Ish
If this is the damage control,then I am honestly not impressed.
Avatar image for valmonte
valmonte

736

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#39 valmonte
Member since 2005 • 736 Posts
[QUOTE="valmonte"][QUOTE="Ragnarok1051"]

Leave gaming to M$ and Nintendo? Did you forget what Song did with PS1 and 2?

Ragnarok1051

Sure didn't. What does that have to do with PS3? Are we to let nostalgia take the place of common sense? Personally, I'm glad to hear DMC4 will have rumble function. But the fact remains that the TC has a point.

It's long been shrugged off by Cows that rumble was unneccessary for the PS3 experience. And that's utter horses***. It was a mistake! Everyone makes them! Sony's been making more then it's share lately! I like Sony. I think in the end they will pull their ass out of the fire and rally the PS3 with a fuller library and another price cut or two.

But Sony's original stance of "Rumble being unneccessary" was ridiculous. And the fact it was supported by so many was ridiculous and further disingenuous. Sony was mired in legal issues with the original Dualshock, so of course they were putting a positive spin on a bad situation. But what excuse do the consumers who backed this utterly stupid contention have? As best I can come up with, it was blatant and insincere damage control. So, while I'm pleased Sony's figured out how to get their rumble situation back on course, the twonks who supported that lame excuse should be ready to suffer a little ribbing over it.

Sony tried to get away with a statement and they didn't, they got called on it and now are answering back. And yet there is hate still coming back to them.

Well, aren't you a saint? Though I agree with your point, it's a bit hollow. Particularly considering your habit of refering to Microsoft as M$. This seems to be inconsistent with your disdain for kneejerk reactions to consolecompany policy. I mean what's the implication exactly? Microsoft is in business for money? ... duh? Or perhaps you're refering to the fact that Microsoft charges for it's gold membership live package? I don't know exactly where you're coming from to be frank.

But let me be frank. Since Sony is so saintly and disinterested in this money that M$ is obsessed with... are they replacing the old controllers? Can the sixaxis be traded in for a replacement? No? That's... unreasonable and financially unviable for Sony, you say? Hmmm... wonder why there would be hate coming from some of the early adopters? What's a dualshock 3 cost again? I'm not sure... bet it's quite a few months of Xbox live though. M$ indeed!

I agree with you, Rag.Sony is answering back, the way they should. And that's a good thing. But I don't think after a year of parroting "Rumble is outdated" that the cows are being unfairly dealt with in suffering a a day or two of "We told you so"'s. And I don't think Sony is such a weepy little girl that it can't take a little hate for screwing people around for year.

Avatar image for Danthegamingman
Danthegamingman

19978

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#40 Danthegamingman
Member since 2003 • 19978 Posts
US doesn't get the new controller until Spring 2008, which means between April and June. WTH Sony thats 7 to 9 months out
Avatar image for AsadMahdi59
AsadMahdi59

7226

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#41 AsadMahdi59
Member since 2005 • 7226 Posts
theres still four aunannounced games. well i think there was a list of ps3 games at tgs four of which werent known and know what? none of them have been shown yet
Avatar image for The_Ish
The_Ish

13913

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#42 The_Ish
Member since 2006 • 13913 Posts

[QUOTE="The_Ish"]Exactly, they made the anouncement... if they don't plan on making it a big deal they wouldn't have given it it's own anouncement at TGS.Dualshockin
If this is the damage control,then I am honestly not impressed.

Oh it isn't damage control... ;)

Avatar image for Ragnarok1051
Ragnarok1051

20238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 Ragnarok1051
Member since 2007 • 20238 Posts
[QUOTE="Ragnarok1051"][QUOTE="valmonte"][QUOTE="Ragnarok1051"]

Leave gaming to M$ and Nintendo? Did you forget what Song did with PS1 and 2?

valmonte

Sure didn't. What does that have to do with PS3? Are we to let nostalgia take the place of common sense? Personally, I'm glad to hear DMC4 will have rumble function. But the fact remains that the TC has a point.

It's long been shrugged off by Cows that rumble was unneccessary for the PS3 experience. And that's utter horses***. It was a mistake! Everyone makes them! Sony's been making more then it's share lately! I like Sony. I think in the end they will pull their ass out of the fire and rally the PS3 with a fuller library and another price cut or two.

But Sony's original stance of "Rumble being unneccessary" was ridiculous. And the fact it was supported by so many was ridiculous and further disingenuous. Sony was mired in legal issues with the original Dualshock, so of course they were putting a positive spin on a bad situation. But what excuse do the consumers who backed this utterly stupid contention have? As best I can come up with, it was blatant and insincere damage control. So, while I'm pleased Sony's figured out how to get their rumble situation back on course, the twonks who supported that lame excuse should be ready to suffer a little ribbing over it.

Sony tried to get away with a statement and they didn't, they got called on it and now are answering back. And yet there is hate still coming back to them.

Well, aren't you a saint? Though I agree with your point, it's a bit hollow. Particularly considering your habit of refering to Microsoft as M$. This seems to be inconsistent with your disdain for kneejerk reactions to consolecompany policy. I mean what's the implication exactly? Microsoft is in business for money? ... duh? Or perhaps you're refering to the fact that Microsoft charges for it's gold membership live package? I don't know exactly where you're coming from to be frank.

But let me be frank. Since Sony is so saintly and disinterested in this money that M$ is obsessed with... are they replacing the old controllers? Can the sixaxis be traded in for a replacement? No? That's... unreasonable and financially unviable for Sony, you say? Hmmm... wonder why there would be hate coming from some of the early adopters? What's a dualshock 3 cost again? I'm not sure... bet it's quite a few months of Xbox live though. M$ indeed!

I agree with you, Rag.Sony is answering back, the way they should. And that's a good thing. But I don't think after a year of parroting "Rumble is outdated" that the cows are being unfairly dealt with in suffering a a day or two of "We told you so"'s. And I don't think Sony is such a weepy little girl that it can't take a little hate for screwing people around for year.

The whole M$ thing is just habbit for me, nothing personal. People will find things to hate about Sony, it seems to be the "it" thing to do nowadays. Us cows are used to getting ragged on in system wars, so a few days of "We told you so" really won't be that bad.

Avatar image for The_Ish
The_Ish

13913

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#44 The_Ish
Member since 2006 • 13913 Posts

It really wasn't made out to big that big, they knew people like us would do that for them.

Ragnarok1051

I disagree, looking at how they made the announcement at TGS...they definately think it's a big deal. TGS is bigger than the old E3. I doubt I am wrong because of that... but I don't know what the company's actual strategies are, so I can't speak for them. If you have something to refute my theory, I'd love to hear it

Avatar image for Spartan8907
Spartan8907

3731

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 Spartan8907
Member since 2006 • 3731 Posts

It was made a big deal because everyone made it a big deal.

Avatar image for valmonte
valmonte

736

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#46 valmonte
Member since 2005 • 736 Posts
[QUOTE="valmonte"]

Well, aren't you a saint? Though I agree with your point, it's a bit hollow. Particularly considering your habit of refering to Microsoft as M$. This seems to be inconsistent with your disdain for kneejerk reactions to consolecompany policy. I mean what's the implication exactly? Microsoft is in business for money? ... duh? Or perhaps you're refering to the fact that Microsoft charges for it's gold membership live package? I don't know exactly where you're coming from to be frank.

But let me be frank. Since Sony is so saintly and disinterested in this money that M$ is obsessed with... are they replacing the old controllers? Can the sixaxis be traded in for a replacement? No? That's... unreasonable and financially unviable for Sony, you say? Hmmm... wonder why there would be hate coming from some of the early adopters? What's a dualshock 3 cost again? I'm not sure... bet it's quite a few months of Xbox live though. M$ indeed!

I agree with you, Rag.Sony is answering back, the way they should. And that's a good thing. But I don't think after a year of parroting "Rumble is outdated" that the cows are being unfairly dealt with in suffering a a day or two of "We told you so"'s. And I don't think Sony is such a weepy little girl that it can't take a little hate for screwing people around for year.

Ragnarok1051

The whole M$ thing is just habbit for me, nothing personal. People will find things to hate about Sony, it seems to be the "it" thing to do nowadays. Us cows are used to getting ragged on in system wars, so a few days of "We told you so" really won't be that bad.

People find things to hate about Sony... True, but then this hasn't been a smooth launch year. Those people will get over it eventually. As the price drops and the library fills out in 2008. Add to that, Rumble is a good thing. Like I said, I DO remember the PS1 and PS2, and I was definately a Cow the last generation. I think Sony'll pull itself out. The fact remains though that this was a very poor first year. So like they say... "just wait".

Avatar image for Ragnarok1051
Ragnarok1051

20238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 Ragnarok1051
Member since 2007 • 20238 Posts
[QUOTE="Ragnarok1051"]

It really wasn't made out to big that big, they knew people like us would do that for them.

The_Ish

I disagree, looking at how they made the announcement at TGS...they definately think it's a big deal. TGS is bigger than the old E3. I doubt I am wrong because of that... but I don't know what the company's actual strategies are, so I can't speak for them. If you have something to refute my theory, I'd love to hear it

Sony made other announcements other then this, but do you see them getting hyped? This shows that we hype what they say.

Avatar image for Sup11722
Sup11722

1757

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 Sup11722
Member since 2005 • 1757 Posts

Sony is just sad.

I was going to by a PS3 this year.

But I guess I'll wait till early 2009.

Don't get me wrong, rumble is good to have, but why are all the cows excited for what they called "last gen tech" when it was first annouced that the PS3 would nothave rumble.

Sony should just stick with TV/s and Surround sound systems.Leasve the gaming to MS and Nintendo.

-Ninja_Dog-

Why The Hell Would They Do that When they have a system that sells and has games coming out for it sure no1 cares about rumble but why would they just drop it lol

Avatar image for The_Ish
The_Ish

13913

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#49 The_Ish
Member since 2006 • 13913 Posts
[QUOTE="The_Ish"][QUOTE="Ragnarok1051"]

It really wasn't made out to big that big, they knew people like us would do that for them.

Ragnarok1051

I disagree, looking at how they made the announcement at TGS...they definately think it's a big deal. TGS is bigger than the old E3. I doubt I am wrong because of that... but I don't know what the company's actual strategies are, so I can't speak for them. If you have something to refute my theory, I'd love to hear it

Sony made other announcements other then this, but do you see them getting hyped? This shows that we hype what they say.

Compelling...but I still disagree. I think they think they are making a big deal out of this, and plan to make it a bigger deal in the coming months...or at least Kojima will...
Avatar image for Shomb22
Shomb22

1190

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 Shomb22
Member since 2006 • 1190 Posts
Hmm yeah, well Just leave it to Sony and Nintendo then to come up more ways to push this industry forward in gaming. Some new ideas fail others don't. Way to go M$, keep up the good work!