Lens of Truth Assassin's Creed 2 Analysis (PS3 vs 360) 360 IS BETTER!

Of course the 360 version is superior yet again.:)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2AWJ4EXeuQY

Theres a surprise :lol: Lens of Truth have no cred, but ill trust them on this one :wink:Nidget

Yeah, like how they gave Batman: AA the win on the PS3, even though that the 360 version has 2xAA, better framerate, among other things. This review, however, seems to be accurate.

[QUOTE="Nidget"]Theres a surprise :lol: Lens of Truth have no cred, but ill trust them on this one :wink:garland51

Yeah, like how they gave Batman: AA the win on the PS3, even though that the 360 version has 2xAA, better framerate, among other things. This review, hoeever, seems to be accurate.

the lighting and shadow effects definitely look better on the 360. Other than that theres really no difference.

wonder if RBG full was on for this video unline the first assassins creed lolstereointegrity

It clearly said that it was on FULL at the end of the video.

Wow, the Playstation version; SUCKED...

XBOX wins this round no contest.

Theres a surprise :lol: Lens of Truth have no cred, but ill trust them on this one :wink:Nidget

Yeah, like how they gave Batman: AA the win on the PS3, even though that the 360 version has 2xAA, better framerate, among other things. This review, hoeever, seems to be accurate.

[QUOTE="Nidget"][QUOTE="garland51"]

Yeah, like how they gave Batman: AA the win on the PS3, even though that the 360 version has 2xAA, better framerate, among other things. This review, hoeever, seems to be accurate.

93soccer

Most of the time yes. On occasion PS3 will get the better looking version though.

Well, that's Ubisoft for ya...

So, now that lensoftruth is accepted here in SW, we can now accept Batman as better on PS3?

Pick a site guys.;)

Of course the 360 version is superior yet again.:)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2AWJ4EXeuQY

KaoSXFACTOR

Well, that's Ubisoft for ya...

So, now that lensoftruth is accepted here in SW, we can now accept Batman as better on PS3?

Pick a site guys.;)

SolidTy

LOT was wrong on Batman: AA being better on PS3. All of the other comparison sites said that the 360 version is superior. It's not about "picking" sites, it's about stating facts.

What's with the color on the PS3 version? Parasomniac

Well, that's Ubisoft for ya...

So, now that lensoftruth is accepted here in SW, we can now accept Batman as better on PS3?

Pick a site guys.;)

SolidTy

[QUOTE="Parasomniac"]What's with the color on the PS3 version? tman93

[QUOTE="SolidTy"]

Well, that's Ubisoft for ya...

So, now that lensoftruth is accepted here in SW, we can now accept Batman as better on PS3?

Pick a site guys.;)

Nidget

That's fine, but whenever a game wins on the other console, all of the sudden it flip flops.:)

Although, their NGS2 article was quite terrible. In the end, I use all the sites I possibly can, and I render a personal judgement.

Batman for instance, had Joker DLC, not to mention exclusive DLC on top of that. DF didnt' even mention the zoomed in camera, etc.

Besides one being brighter, what I watched looked the same in motion.

I just watched it. Holy ******* crap, Batman, the screentearing on the PS3 version is absolutely awful. :|

[QUOTE="tman93"][QUOTE="Parasomniac"]What's with the color on the PS3 version? Broman6015

At 3:48 - 4:00 that is surely the same time of day. The 360 version simply looks better.

[QUOTE="SolidTy"]

Well, that's Ubisoft for ya...

So, now that lensoftruth is accepted here in SW, we can now accept Batman as better on PS3?

Pick a site guys.;)

garland51

LOT was wrong on Batman: AA being better on PS3. All of the other comparison sites said that the 360 version is superior. It's not about "picking" sites, it's about stating facts.

It's about stating facts?? What are you smoking? So your saying LOT is right about the 360 version of AC2 being superior yet you say LOT is wrong with Batman: AA being superior on PS3?? Clearly your just a typical fanboy trolling about. Move along.

[QUOTE="SolidTy"]

Well, that's Ubisoft for ya...

So, now that lensoftruth is accepted here in SW, we can now accept Batman as better on PS3?

Pick a site guys.;)

garland51

LOT was wrong on Batman: AA being better on PS3. All of the other comparison sites said that the 360 version is superior. It's not about "picking" sites, it's about stating facts.

AKA you pick and choose comparsions. :roll:

[QUOTE="Broman6015"][QUOTE="tman93"] As I posted, completely different time of day in game, this game has day/night cycles. KaoSXFACTOR

At 3:48 - 4:00 that is surely the same time of day. The 360 version simply looks better.

Besides one being brighter, what I watched looked the same in motion.

Kahuna_1

[QUOTE="garland51"]

LOT was wrong on Batman: AA being better on PS3. All of the other comparison sites said that the 360 version is superior. It's not about "picking" sites, it's about stating facts.

Blazerdt47

It's about stating facts?? What are you smoking? So your saying LOT is right about the 360 version of AC2 being superior yet you say LOT is wrong with Batman: AA being superior on PS3?? Clearly your just a typical fanboy trolling about. Move along.

AKA you pick and choose comparsions. :roll:

OneLazyAsian

Ah, the denial. Just read through these. What you seem to forget that LOT can at times be wrong, while other sites like Digital Foundry, & B3D forums, aren't & has a lot more credibility than LOT.

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/face-off-batman-arkham-asylum-face-off

http://www.systemwars.com/forums/showthread.php?t=34248

http://forum.beyond3d.com/showthread.php?t=46241

Just pitiful, really. That's the best you two could come up with? Calling me a "fanboy troll," & saying that I "pick & choose" comparisons. Pitiful.

[QUOTE="KaoSXFACTOR"]

[QUOTE="Broman6015"] That's what I figured too. Because if those were both at the same time of day, then wow that would be a massive difference. tman93

At 3:48 - 4:00 that is surely the same time of day. The 360 version simply looks better.

Maybe it only "looked"like morning because that's how the game actually looks?

[QUOTE="Blazerdt47"]

[QUOTE="garland51"]

It's about stating facts?? What are you smoking? So your saying LOT is right about the 360 version of AC2 being superior yet you say LOT is wrong with Batman: AA being superior on PS3?? Clearly your just a typical fanboy trolling about. Move along.

garland51

AKA you pick and choose comparsions. :roll:

OneLazyAsian

Ah, the denial. Just read through these. What you seem to forget that LOT can at times be wrong, while other sites like Digital Foundry, & B3D forums, aren't & has a lot more credibility than LOT.

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/face-off-batman-arkham-asylum-face-off

http://www.systemwars.com/forums/showthread.php?t=34248

http://forum.beyond3d.com/showthread.php?t=46241

Just pitiful, really. That's the best you two could come up with? Calling me a "fanboy troll," & saying that I "pick & choose" comparisons. Pitiful.

But we aren't talking about other reviews. We are talking about LoT. You are picking and choosing which LoT to believe. All of a sudden LoT is correct now but not then? So how are they correct now when you stated that they are not credible? Besides, the Eurogamer comparsion even states that the PS3 held its own even without AA and 2xMSAA. :|

[QUOTE="garland51"]

[QUOTE="Blazerdt47"]

[QUOTE="OneLazyAsian"]

AKA you pick and choose comparsions. :roll:

OneLazyAsian

Ah, the denial. Just read through these. What you seem to forget that LOT can at times be wrong, while other sites like Digital Foundry, & B3D forums, aren't & has a lot more credibility than LOT.

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/face-off-batman-arkham-asylum-face-off

http://www.systemwars.com/forums/showthread.php?t=34248

http://forum.beyond3d.com/showthread.php?t=46241

Just pitiful, really. That's the best you two could come up with? Calling me a "fanboy troll," & saying that I "pick & choose" comparisons. Pitiful.

But we aren't talking about other reviews. We are talking about LoT. You are picking and choosing which LoT to believe. All of a sudden LoT is correct now but not then? So how are they correct now when you stated that they are not credible?

[QUOTE="garland51"]

[QUOTE="OneLazyAsian"]

AKA you pick and choose comparsions. :roll:

OneLazyAsian

Ah, the denial. Just read through these. What you seem to forget that LOT can at times be wrong, while other sites like Digital Foundry, & B3D forums, aren't & has a lot more credibility than LOT.

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/face-off-batman-arkham-asylum-face-off

http://www.systemwars.com/forums/showthread.php?t=34248

http://forum.beyond3d.com/showthread.php?t=46241

Just pitiful, really. That's the best you two could come up with? Calling me a "fanboy troll," & saying that I "pick & choose" comparisons. Pitiful.

But we aren't talking about other reviews. We are talking about LoT. You are picking and choosing which LoT to believe. All of a sudden LoT is correct now but not then? So how are they correct now when you stated that they are not credible? Besides, the Eurogamer comparsion even states that the PS3 held its own even without AA and 2xMSAA. :|

It's just guessing, to be honest with you.

anyone who has posted on this thread trying to argue are the biggest graphic fanboys of all time. im embarrased to be a gamer because of people like the ones in this thread.

/RANT

the only thing i have noticed is the color satuartion which is higher on x360, how did you ppl got that details abt texutres?, performance, they are the same to me.

and seriously from here on, i would rather see a true graphical differences between games, something like KZ2 and L4D2 differences.

anyone who has posted on this thread trying to argue are the biggest graphic fanboys of all time. im embarrased to be a gamer because of people like the ones in this thread.

/RANT

bokiloki

/agree completely

Who cares anymore, I'm more interested in whether exclusives down the pipeline look better than the ps3 stuff.

Multiplats just look better on the xbox 360. Sooner people accept that, the better93soccer

Yeah...but Killzone and Uncharted make EVERYTHING THE 360 HAS look so dull !!!! I don't even care for Assassin's Creed !

Theres a surprise :lol: Lens of Truth have no cred, but ill trust them on this one :wink:Nidget

Typical fanboy comment they have no cred, but because it supports your view you will trust them, however if they said the PS3 version was better they still would have no cred.

[QUOTE="bokiloki"]

anyone who has posted on this thread trying to argue are the biggest graphic fanboys of all time. im embarrased to be a gamer because of people like the ones in this thread.

/RANT

njean777

/agree completely

yep, multiplats go to the 360. Now if only the 360 can beat the ps3 in exclusives, then that'l be a compelling argument;)

[QUOTE="Blazerdt47"]

[QUOTE="garland51"]

It's about stating facts?? What are you smoking? So your saying LOT is right about the 360 version of AC2 being superior yet you say LOT is wrong with Batman: AA being superior on PS3?? Clearly your just a typical fanboy trolling about. Move along.

[QUOTE="OneLazyAsian"]

AKA you pick and choose comparsions. :roll:

Ah, the denial. Just read through these. What you seem to forget that LOT canat times be wrong, while other sites like Digital Foundry, & B3D forums, aren't & has a lot morecredibility than LOT.

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/face-off-batman-arkham-asylum-face-off

http://www.systemwars.com/forums/showthread.php?t=34248

http://forum.beyond3d.com/showthread.php?t=46241

Just pitiful, really. That's the best you two could come up with? Calling me a "fanboy troll," & saying that I "pick & choose" comparisons. Pitiful.

What a shocker nothing really hugly different.Besides 360 being a bit darker with color the games run and play the same. I guess fanboys just need something to help them sleep at night. Which is pretty dam sad. I also wonder if this is the same situation like MW2 where the colors ont he 360 look darker,but that was cause the default setting was different on both system.