Lens of truth mass effect 2 analysis

[QUOTE="theuncharted34"]

[QUOTE="broken_ops"]ign also said dead space 2 is the new gold standard in survival horror games:lol: ExESGO

? dead space 2 looks awesome though. looks like it put a bigger emphasis on the horror aspect than the first.

It's more empahsis on both really ;)

looks pretty great :)

[QUOTE="XBOXSTRONG"][QUOTE="TintedEyes"] the me2 version on 360 has no dlc includedTintedEyes

also it's funny because in bundles it's usually cheaper, but in this case buying the 360 DLC separate makes it cheaper lmao

"thePS3version required a hefty install which weighed in at 4272 mb and took almost 30 minutes to complete."

this stuff has bugged me this whole gen. no biggie in the long run really just.. y'know, annoying.

[QUOTE="ExESGO"]Did they really use ME3's engine or was it just the minor updated version we all have?theuncharted34

the mass effect 3 engine according to Bioware.

[QUOTE="XBOXSTRONG"][QUOTE="TintedEyes"] the me2 version on 360 has no dlc includedTintedEyes

[QUOTE="TintedEyes"][QUOTE="XBOXSTRONG"] you can get the 360 version with all it's DLC for 45$ compared to the PS3 at 60$XBOXSTRONG

Let's compare.

Xbox 360:

• Two disks; must disk swap twice during the 25-30 hour game.
• Negligible Better performance. (according to Digital Foundry)
• Negligible Better graphics. (according to Digital Foundry)
• No DLC on disks.
• DLC available for download on XBL.
• Can import ME1 character.
• Total Cost with DLC: $44 ($20 for original game, and $24 for the DLC)

PS3:

• One Disk; 5.2GB mandatory install. Wait time aprox. 30 minutes, though results will vary from user to user.
• DLC included on disk.
• No importing of ME1 characters; has 15 minute comic to condense a 30 hour game.
• Total Cost: $60

Conclusion:

• Both versions are damn near identical.
• Xbox 360 version is cheaper.

[QUOTE="soulitane"][QUOTE="TintedEyes"] sure u can go get it, but it isnt included like the ps versionTintedEyes

[QUOTE="TintedEyes"][QUOTE="soulitane"] And the ps3 version has a 30 minute install, which you could probably download most of the DLC in that time.dreman999

Lens of Bias.

Let's compare.

Xbox 360:

• Two disks; must disk swap twice during the 25-30 hour game.
• Negligible Better performance. (according to Digital Foundry)
• Negligible Better graphics. (according to Digital Foundry)
• No DLC on disks.
• DLC available for download on XBL.
• Can import ME1 character.
• Total Cost with DLC: $44 ($20 for original game, and $24 for the DLC)

PS3:

• One Disk; 5.2GB mandatory install. Wait time aprox. 30 minutes, though results will vary from user to user.
• DLC included on disk.
• No importing of ME1 characters; has 15 minute comic to condense a 30 hour game.
• Total Cost: $60

Conclusion:

• Both versions are damn near identical.
• Xbox 360 version is cheaper.

Stevo_the_gamer

If you can get that, then get the xbox version.

If you cant get that, watch this ....http://www.lazygamer.net/mass-effect-2-screw-the-interactive-comic-catch-up-with-these-videos-instead/ Than get the ps3 version.

[QUOTE="DerpyMcDerp"]

More like Lens of Lies.

the-obiwan

[QUOTE="the-obiwan"][QUOTE="DerpyMcDerp"]

More like Lens of Lies.

lol at cows still trying to talk up ME2 on ps3.

it flopped. 8.5/10. floppage. floppety flop. flopping flopper flop.

its not the superior console version, and even if it was, if you were concerned with the superior version you'd get it on PC instead.

[QUOTE="XBOXSTRONG"][QUOTE="TintedEyes"] well in your opinion you might not find it worth it, but its still in the ps3 versionTintedEyes

[QUOTE="TintedEyes"][QUOTE="XBOXSTRONG"] it's pretty much a no brainier that most people wouldn't pay an extra 15$ for it being on one disk or in other cases if people don't want dlc they have that option on 360 as well, so you can save 40$ because you have to get dlc on the PS3 version even if you don't want to pay extra for downloadable contentdreman999

[QUOTE="TintedEyes"]So same graphics and all the dlc, pretty easy to see its the best console versionsonny2dap

[QUOTE="the-obiwan"][QUOTE="DerpyMcDerp"]

More like Lens of Lies.

ubpoker123

If I would have to rank the versions of mass effect 2, it would be - Pc > xbox 360 >> ps3. Because ps3 owners are missing out on a ton with the first mass effect. And when it's a game like this that adds soo much if you've played the first, then I'd say it's a pretty big deal.

[QUOTE="XBOXSTRONG"][QUOTE="TintedEyes"] i get that people might not want the dlc, but it still is included in the ps3 version not to mention the new engine, being on one disc etcTintedEyes

[QUOTE="XBOXSTRONG"][QUOTE="TintedEyes"] and everything else i mentioned, but alright if you say soTintedEyes

[QUOTE="TintedEyes"][QUOTE="XBOXSTRONG"] so in a nutshell, if you don't have 60 bucks to spend and just want to get ME2 then 360 is your choice if you have 60$ to spend then your choice would still be 360 and you save 15$broken_ops

[QUOTE="TintedEyes"][QUOTE="XBOXSTRONG"] ME3 engine which doesn't give it a graphical advantage, disk change is the only thingArach666

the ps3 version has no screen tearing what so ever (v-sync is on). But the 360 version has very little tearing anyways.

[QUOTE="XBOXSTRONG"][QUOTE="TintedEyes"] actually is depends, ars technica for example said it ran smoother on the ps3TintedEyes

[QUOTE="Arach666"]

[QUOTE="TintedEyes"] actually is depends, ars technica for example said it ran smoother on the ps3theuncharted34

the ps3 version has no screen tearing what so ever (v-sync is on). But the 360 version has very little tearing anyways.