Let's be honest, nothing comes close to Uncharted 4's character models

@dynamitecop: Laura does look very good until you get to the weird facial animations, those are just bad. Plus the clipping.

The Xbox one version is like 90% the graphics of the PC version, it looks very good on console already, it's definitely not a game that takes advantage of PC hardware beyond higher res textures and one notch higher environment lod. So if Laura looks better (I would say she does, besides animation), it's not the PS4's fault lol. The game's got an xbox 360 port and it's coming to Ps4 soon.

Basically power means next to nothing anymore and it's all about the development.

@zeeshanhaider said:

@silversix_ said:

@Thunderdrone said:

All that tech and still, nothing beats using as much of the real thing as possible.

L.A. Noire tech should be brought back from the grave and improved. Shits all over UC4 facial animation.

this is like the biggest mystery ever. why no one uses this tech? Its simply incredible. sure, its not needed for every game but imagine having this in a game with a lot of dialogue. Imagine TW3 with this tech... omfg

Yeah and you know how much would it cost for a game a size of Witcher 3? I guess, that's the reason.

Well, at least do it for the main story, not the side quests. Also, it was just an example, i just want to see this tech in other dialogue heavy titles. Nowdays, lips sync is improving but the facial animations are still shit in at least 80% of games being released.

Great looking games stay great looking years after they have been released.

@FreedomFreeLife Why the first three screenshots are terribly compressed? You have to be fair.

So, SONY, current gen 8 console leader wins again. Outstanding,

you see face image and low face quality has nothing to do with compressed. I took 720p full HD images.

Bethesda, take notes.

Sony fanboy's obsession with the LoD 0 models in cutscenes in Uncharted 4 is borderline unhealthy.

I'm not denying that, I feel TPS are incredibly boring compared to FPS. I say the same about gears (hate gears, I dont mind uncharted though).

The genre is just not impressive, FPS are pretty simple but damn TPS are just....

Never denied that their graphics team are top talent.

lol most intense gunfights... christ. I'm not touching this one with a barge pole ....

Crysis and Crysis 2:

I took some screenshots of Uncharted 4:

nothing comes close to Uncharted 4's character models

@dynamitecop: Except you haven't provided any evidence all you have provided is an opionion. UC4 is almost certainly using more polygons per a character not to mention they are also better animated. So your sole advantage to ROTR would be texture resolution and that's strictly the PC version. You talk about the law of diminishing returns and then say UC4 character models are not even half as impressive?

They raised the bar in gameplay aswel. Also, Uncharted 4 can be played in many different ways, I disagree that's it's shallow.

Second, by "intense" I didn't mean difficulty.

Uncharted 4 is great but it's simply not the best out tbh. Other games like Mafia 3 are arguably going to look better. ROTTR is going to look better than U4 as well.

its pretty much all you hear about the game.

@FreedomFreeLife said:

This thread is funny. OP is troll.

"from gameplay"....yet the first UC4 pic is the most used screen from the internet and at no point in time do you see those angles during gameplay.

All the shit talking about Americans being dumb and this is the intellect level of your reply?

I always wondered, sorry if a dumb question, but I wonder if the graphic fidelity is based on the artist's potential more than the graphics card/hardware the system has. Basically, if you hire a bunch of world class artist could they make a better looking game on limited hardware compared to "good" artist who are working with unlimited hardware.

i think the OP hasn't seen a lot of the newer games over the years.

@SecretPolice said:

QB...

Plus as a bonus.. Jacket King as well. lol :P

We're talking about video games and not about TV shows.

Says the fanboy of the weaker system.

He's actually correct, in a crude sense of things. Games have reached such a level of fidelity and polygons that you could literally be running half the amount of them in a player model next to another game and the differences on the surface would appear minimal.

It's all about fine details now, and in games you just can't see them unless you get unnaturally close.

@dynamitecop: Wow, Lara's character model is stunning! It easily shits on Nate Drake's model.

What system?

I agree - that's why graphics have no long-term impact on any game design.