List of new Nintendo IP's Since 2001

http://kyoto-report.wikidot.com/forum/t-469495

So.....ummmmm....why are people saying they don't make new stuff?

Even if you don't like/agree with 10 or 20 of the stuff on that list there is still like another 20.

I see plenty of new IPs.

Because Nintendo are doomed and they don't ever innovate or try something new. 

I see plenty of new IPs.

Michael0134567

Ones that nobody has heard of and fitness games.

[QUOTE="Michael0134567"]

I see plenty of new IPs.

NathanDrakeSwag

Ones that nobody has heard of and fitness games.

So we're just gonna dismiss them as new IPs, I'm guessing.

[QUOTE="NathanDrakeSwag"]

[QUOTE="Michael0134567"]

I see plenty of new IPs.

Michael0134567

Ones that nobody has heard of and fitness games.

So we're just gonna dismiss them as new IPs, I'm guessing.

Sheep are like the guy who always says "Ummmmm, well, actually..."

Technically correct, but in a completely irrelevant way.

[QUOTE="Michael0134567"]

[QUOTE="NathanDrakeSwag"]

Ones that nobody has heard of and fitness games.

me2002

So we're just gonna dismiss them as new IPs, I'm guessing.

[QUOTE="me2002"][QUOTE="Michael0134567"]

So we're just gonna dismiss them as new IPs, I'm guessing.

StrongBlackVine

[QUOTE="Michael0134567"]

I see plenty of new IPs.

NathanDrakeSwag

Ones that nobody has heard of and fitness games.

Just because you don't like content does not change the fact that they have been making new IP's. There are a few things I don't care for on that list, but that doesn't change the fact that it is a new IP.

http://kyoto-report.wikidot.com/forum/t-469495

So.....ummmmm....why are people saying they don't make new stuff?

Even if you don't like/agree with 10 or 20 of the stuff on that list there is still like another 20.

painguy1

-How many of those games are good?

-How many of those games had big budgets?

-How many of those games had Nintendo's top talent on them?

-How many of those games had proper advertising?

Nintendo puts all its money and best talent on its big name IPs, they dont invest heavily into new IPs, Xenoblade Chronicles was a rare exception, Nintendo didnt even care about that game.

[QUOTE="NathanDrakeSwag"]

[QUOTE="Michael0134567"]

I see plenty of new IPs.

painguy1

Ones that nobody has heard of and fitness games.

Just because you don't like content does not change the fact that they have been making new IP's. There are a few things I don't care for on that list, but that doesn't change the fact that it is a new IP.

Games with no effort shouldn't count.

Whatever works in your favour, I suppose. :roll:

[QUOTE="NathanDrakeSwag"]

[QUOTE="Michael0134567"]

I see plenty of new IPs.

painguy1

Ones that nobody has heard of and fitness games.

Just because you don't like content does not change the fact that they have been making new IP's. There are a few things I don't care for on that list, but that doesn't change the fact that it is a new IP.

New IPs are worthless when they suck.

Whatever works in your favour, I suppose. :roll:

Michael0134567

New IPs are worthless when they suck.

NathanDrakeSwag

That is a subjective statement. Fact of the matter is that ppl have been complaining that Ninty makes no new IP's(that was the argument). They are wrong. 

[QUOTE="NathanDrakeSwag"]

New IPs are worthless when they suck.

painguy1

That is a subjective statement. Fact of the matter is that ppl have been complaining that Ninty makes no new IP's(that was the argument). They are wrong. 

Shovelware does not count.

[QUOTE="Michael0134567"]

Whatever works in your favour, I suppose. :roll:

Cherokee_Jack

That's System Wars. :P

[QUOTE="painguy1"]

[QUOTE="NathanDrakeSwag"]

New IPs are worthless when they suck.

StrongBlackVine

That is a subjective statement. Fact of the matter is that ppl have been complaining that Ninty makes no new IP's(that was the argument). They are wrong. 

Shovelware does not count.

Apparently sheep think it does because its all they have.

[QUOTE="painguy1"]

[QUOTE="NathanDrakeSwag"]

New IPs are worthless when they suck.

StrongBlackVine

That is a subjective statement. Fact of the matter is that ppl have been complaining that Ninty makes no new IP's(that was the argument). They are wrong. 

Shovelware does not count.

A new IP is a new IP. If you want to change the argument to Nintendo's new IP's suck then I'd be inclined to agree with you on some of the IP's listed on that site. But there is no true answer to such an argument since its subjective.

[QUOTE="NathanDrakeSwag"]

[QUOTE="Michael0134567"]

I see plenty of new IPs.

Michael0134567

Ones that nobody has heard of and fitness games.

So we're just gonna dismiss them as new IPs, I'm guessing.

If you want to change the argument to Nintendo's new IP's suckpainguy1

[QUOTE="StrongBlackVine"]

[QUOTE="painguy1"]

That is a subjective statement. Fact of the matter is that ppl have been complaining that Ninty makes no new IP's(that was the argument). They are wrong. 

 

 

NathanDrakeSwag

Shovelware does not count.

Apparently sheep think it does because its all they have.

[QUOTE="painguy1"]If you want to change the argument to Nintendo's new IP's suckCherokee_Jack

That's a differen't argument, and not the target of this thread. I'd agree with you on that argument. My goal here was to prove that those who say Nintendo makes no new IP's are wrong. I achieved that goal.

[QUOTE="Cherokee_Jack"][QUOTE="painguy1"]If you want to change the argument to Nintendo's new IP's suckpainguy1

That's a differen't argument, and not the target of this thread. I'd agree with you on that argument. My goal here was to prove that those who say Nintendo makes no new IP's are wrong. I achieved that goal.

[QUOTE="Cherokee_Jack"][QUOTE="painguy1"]If you want to change the argument to Nintendo's new IP's suckpainguy1

That's a differen't argument

Who's to say it is?

There's such a thing as exaggeration. "Nintendo has no new IPs" could easily be shorthand for what I just said. I think it most often is (disregarding trolls). 

[QUOTE="painguy1"]

[QUOTE="Cherokee_Jack"] How about changing the argument back to what it's always been: Nintendo routinely puts the bulk of their talent and funding into old IP and neglects almost all new IP.Jakandsigz

That's a differen't argument, and not the target of this thread. I'd agree with you on that argument. My goal here was to prove that those who say Nintendo makes no new IP's are wrong. I achieved that goal.

Nintendo published those games(meaning they gave their own money to have the game made) therefore they belong to Nintendo. If Nintendo didn't pay the money they wouldn't exist. Infamous for example is made by Suckerpunch, but Sony published the game therefore Infamous is a Sony IP. Suckerpunch has in the past released games for the N64. Those games on that list are new Nintendo IP's. 

[QUOTE="painguy1"]

[QUOTE="Cherokee_Jack"] How about changing the argument back to what it's always been: Nintendo routinely puts the bulk of their talent and funding into old IP and neglects almost all new IP.Cherokee_Jack

That's a differen't argument

Who's to say it is?

There's such a thing as exaggeration. "Nintendo has no new IPs" could easily be shorthand for what I just said. I think it most often is (disregarding trolls). 

"..neglects almost all new IP" implies that they have new IP's which they aren't going back to which is not the same as Nintendo does not make new IP's

  "Nintendo has no new IPs " would be the shorthand of "Nintendo routinely puts the bulk of their talent and funding into old IP and neglects to make new IP's."

There is a very big difference there. One statement implies that new IP's exist the other does not.

[QUOTE="Jakandsigz"][QUOTE="painguy1"]

That's a differen't argument, and not the target of this thread. I'd agree with you on that argument. My goal here was to prove that those who say Nintendo makes no new IP's are wrong. I achieved that goal.

 

 

painguy1

Nintendo published those games(meaning they gave their own money to have the game made) therefore they belong to Nintendo. If Nintendo didn't pay the money they wouldn't exist. Infamous for example is made by Suckerpunch, but Sony published the game therefore Infamous is a Sony IP. Suckerpunch has in the past released games for the N64. Those games on that list are new Nintendo IP's. 

[QUOTE="Jakandsigz"][QUOTE="painguy1"]

That's a differen't argument, and not the target of this thread. I'd agree with you on that argument. My goal here was to prove that those who say Nintendo makes no new IP's are wrong. I achieved that goal.

 

 

painguy1

Nintendo published those games(meaning they gave their own money to have the game made) therefore they belong to Nintendo. If Nintendo didn't pay the money they wouldn't exist. Infamous for example is made by Suckerpunch, but Sony published the game therefore Infamous is a Sony IP. Suckerpunch has in the past released games for the N64. Those games on that list are new Nintendo IP's. 

[QUOTE="NathanDrakeSwag"]

[QUOTE="StrongBlackVine"]

Shovelware does not count.

me2002

Apparently sheep think it does because its all they have.

Both of those games are pretty good.

[QUOTE="Michael0134567"]

[QUOTE="NathanDrakeSwag"]

Ones that nobody has heard of and fitness games.

me2002

So we're just gonna dismiss them as new IPs, I'm guessing.

[QUOTE="me2002"][QUOTE="NathanDrakeSwag"]

Apparently sheep think it does because its all they have.

super600

Both of those games are ppretty good.

Not really. I played them when all the non-gamers were infatuated with the Wii.

[QUOTE="painguy1"]

[QUOTE="Jakandsigz"] No you didn't half those IPs are not owned by Nintendo.Jakandsigz

Nintendo published those games(meaning they gave their own money to have the game made) therefore they belong to Nintendo. If Nintendo didn't pay the money they wouldn't exist. Infamous for example is made by Suckerpunch, but Sony published the game therefore Infamous is a Sony IP. Suckerpunch has in the past released games for the N64. Those games on that list are new Nintendo IP's. 

You can go ahead and look at the history of most of those companies that have their games on that list & their relationship with Nintendo. Even if some of those games aren't owned by Nintendo there are 40 something names on that list many of which are games from second party developers.

[QUOTE="super600"]

[QUOTE="me2002"] they also count wii sports and wii fitStrongBlackVine

Both of those games are ppretty good.

Not really. I played them when all the non-gamers were infatuated with the Wii.

[QUOTE="me2002"][QUOTE="Michael0134567"]

So we're just gonna dismiss them as new IPs, I'm guessing.

RyanShazam

Nope. Nintendo lack of muliplats makes it the worst by default. No amount Mario will change that.

[QUOTE="StrongBlackVine"]

[QUOTE="super600"]

Both of those games are ppretty good.

RyanShazam

Not really. I played them when all the non-gamers were infatuated with the Wii.

When/where do you think I was playing these shitty Wii games? I didn't buy one. I can sense your desperation.

[QUOTE="me2002"][QUOTE="Michael0134567"]

So we're just gonna dismiss them as new IPs, I'm guessing.

RyanShazam

...PS3's library is crap?

[QUOTE="me2002"][QUOTE="NathanDrakeSwag"]

Apparently sheep think it does because its all they have.

super600

Both of those games are pretty good.

:lol: