List of new Nintendo IP's Since 2001

They need a new Advance Wars game for the 3DS and more Fire Emblem games for the 3DS nao!!!!

[QUOTE="me2002"][QUOTE="Michael0134567"]

So we're just gonna dismiss them as new IPs, I'm guessing.

RyanShazam

Lololol.

[QUOTE="super600"]

[QUOTE="me2002"] they also count wii sports and wii fitme2002

Both of those games are pretty good.

:lol:

Sheep have no standards. After 30 years of being fed the same rehashes they have no clue what a real game is.

[QUOTE="RyanShazam"][QUOTE="StrongBlackVine"]

Not really. I played them when all the non-gamers were infatuated with the Wii.

StrongBlackVine

When/where do you think I was playing these shitty Wii games? I didn't buy one. I can sense your desperation.

[QUOTE="StrongBlackVine"]

[QUOTE="RyanShazam"] Wii Sports is a blast to play drunk with your friends... Wait, I forgot Cows don't have friends to play local with.MFDOOM1983

When/where do you think I was playing these shitty Wii games? I didn't buy one. I can sense your desperation.

[QUOTE="RyanShazam"][QUOTE="StrongBlackVine"]

Not really. I played them when all the non-gamers were infatuated with the Wii.

StrongBlackVine

When/where do you think I was playing these shitty Wii games? I didn't buy one. I can sense your desperation.

[QUOTE="MFDOOM1983"]

[QUOTE="StrongBlackVine"]

When/where do you think I was playing these shitty Wii games? I didn't buy one. I can sense your desperation.

RyanShazam

[QUOTE="super600"]

[QUOTE="me2002"] they also count wii sports and wii fitme2002

Both of those games are pretty good.

:lol:

Is it wrong for a person to like games meant for casuals?

[QUOTE="MFDOOM1983"]

[QUOTE="StrongBlackVine"]

When/where do you think I was playing these shitty Wii games? I didn't buy one. I can sense your desperation.

RyanShazam

Wow, I thought he was joking. You are lame.

[QUOTE="RyanShazam"][QUOTE="MFDOOM1983"] Expecting the guy with a giant nintendo themed tattoo on his back to be impartial in this discussion.:lol: 

StrongBlackVine

Wow, I thought he was joking. You are lame.

Lol.

[QUOTE="RyanShazam"][QUOTE="MFDOOM1983"] Expecting the guy with a giant nintendo themed tattoo on his back to be impartial in this discussion.:lol: 

MFDOOM1983

[QUOTE="RyanShazam"][QUOTE="MFDOOM1983"] Expecting the guy with a giant nintendo themed tattoo on his back to be impartial in this discussion.:lol: 

StrongBlackVine

Wow, I thought he was joking. You are lame.

[QUOTE="me2002"]

[QUOTE="super600"]

Both of those games are pretty good.

super600

:lol:

Is is wrong for a person to like games meant for casuals?

[QUOTE="Jakandsigz"][QUOTE="painguy1"]

Nintendo published those games(meaning they gave their own money to have the game made) therefore they belong to Nintendo. If Nintendo didn't pay the money they wouldn't exist. Infamous for example is made by Suckerpunch, but Sony published the game therefore Infamous is a Sony IP. Suckerpunch has in the past released games for the N64. Those games on that list are new Nintendo IP's. 

 

 

painguy1

You can go ahead and look at the history of most of those companies that have their games on that list & their relationship with Nintendo. Even if some of those games aren't owned by Nintendo there are 40 something names on that list many of which are games from second party developers.

[QUOTE="Michael0134567"]

I see plenty of new IPs.

NathanDrakeSwag

Ones that nobody has heard of and fitness games.

[QUOTE="painguy1"]

[QUOTE="Jakandsigz"] You have no idea what published means do you? It has nothing to do with the making of the game. Some companies just went to Nintendo and asked to distribute it. Sony Published Infamous? You also add even more to why you have no idea how publishing works. MS Published Gears of War, is it a MS Ip? Crash Bandicoot 2 is published by Sony, why does Activision have the rights? I mena there is so much freaking stupidity here it's hilarious. I can make a whole list of published franchises not owned by the publisher like half of Xseeds games.Jakandsigz

You can go ahead and look at the history of most of those companies that have their games on that list & their relationship with Nintendo. Even if some of those games aren't owned by Nintendo there are 40 something names on that list many of which are games from second party developers.

you can keep doing w/e you want. Every game that appeared originally on Nintendo systems and was exclusively published by Nintendo have only appeared on Nintendo systems. There is an ongoing trend here. It's pretty safe to say that when Nintendo publishes a game with these condintions, they ask for exclusivity. Rare is an exception and only because Nintendo sold their 49% stake in Rare thereby giving up their rights to the IP's they invested in by publishing their games.

[QUOTE="Cherokee_Jack"]

[QUOTE="painguy1"]

That's a differen't argument

painguy1

Who's to say it is?

There's such a thing as exaggeration. "Nintendo has no new IPs" could easily be shorthand for what I just said. I think it most often is (disregarding trolls). 

"..neglects almost all new IP" implies that they have new IP's which they aren't going back to which is not the same as Nintendo does not make new IP's

  "Nintendo has no new IPs " would be the shorthand of "Nintendo routinely puts the bulk of their talent and funding into old IP and neglects to make new IP's."

There is a very big difference there. One statement implies that new IP's exist the other does not.

Again, exaggeration.

When people say "the Vita has no games" they don't mean there are literally no Vita-compatible games on the market. They mean it doesn't have enough exclusive games of high quality to justify buying one.

question is how many new isp did microsoft put out since 2001 lmaooo

Hooray look at all that filler, and lol you have stuff like Excite Truck and Donkey Konga and Luigi's Mansion as new ips. All 3 of them at best would be spinoffs of Excitebike, Donkey Kong, and Mario Bros(admittedly Luigi's Mansion eventually became something interesting in Luigi's Mansion 2).

I was curious to see the output of the Wii and Wii-U released so far (no Wiiware / Japan only) - 

Metacritic scores - 

• Xenoblade Chronicles - (92)
• The Last Story - (80)
• Wii Fit - (80)
• Nintendo Land - (77)
• Wii Sports - (76)
• Pandoras Tower - (74)
• Excite Truck - (72)
• Endless Ocean - (72)
• Disaster Day of Crisis - (69)
• Wii Music - (53)
• Wii Play - (58)
• FlingSmash - (48)

Ummmm ..... yeah. 

because they are afaid of what nintendo is capable of that it might move sony elsewhere ,  cause lets face it , no one was able to top sony besides nintendo lol microsoft couldnt do it -looking at the charts sonys just  less then a m back so ps3 will obviously pass 360 but not wii , and even if it did , it would do so when wii has seen its replacment out face the facts , sw is full of sony supporters and less nintendo /ms supporters because everyone knows sw isnt really relevent to actual news 

because they are afaid of what nintendo is capable of that it might move sony elsewhere ,  cause lets face it , no one was able to top sony besides nintendo lol microsoft couldnt do it -looking at the charts sonys just  less then a m back so ps3 will obviously pass 360 but not wii , and even if it did , it would do so when wii has seen its replacment out face the facts , sw is full of sony supporters and less nintendo /ms supporters because everyone knows sw isnt really relevent to actual news 

mariokart64fan

what are you saying dude? calm yo self. You just went a crazy and uneeded tangent (as usual)

Captain Rainbow :lol:

One of these days I will unbderstand why people try to protect Nintendo.

[QUOTE="painguy1"]

[QUOTE="Jakandsigz"] You have no idea what published means do you? It has nothing to do with the making of the game. Some companies just went to Nintendo and asked to distribute it. Sony Published Infamous? You also add even more to why you have no idea how publishing works. MS Published Gears of War, is it a MS Ip? Crash Bandicoot 2 is published by Sony, why does Activision have the rights? I mena there is so much freaking stupidity here it's hilarious. I can make a whole list of published franchises not owned by the publisher like half of Xseeds games.Jakandsigz

You can go ahead and look at the history of most of those companies that have their games on that list & their relationship with Nintendo. Even if some of those games aren't owned by Nintendo there are 40 something names on that list many of which are games from second party developers.

I'm going down the list, just an unassuming ignoramus on his way.

Luigi's Mansion that's Luigi right there. Might as well make a game called Halo Pinball or Uncharted Garden Grooming and call it a new IP
Pikmin OK
Eternal Darkness: Sanity's Requiem good game
GiFTPiA what?
Donkey Konga that's donkey kong...
Battalion Wars eh, ok-ish game
Geist what?
Chibi-Robo! one game and it sucked
Odama see chibi-robo

Nintendo Wii

Art Style what?
Wii Sports lol
Excite Truck excitebikes much? oh this is with trucks, I get it. completely different
Wii Play even more lols
Endless Ocean OK
Wii Fit massive lols
Wii Music why are these craploads different ip's?
Disaster: Day of Crisis i thought this was cancelled but ok
Captain Rainbow lol
Common sense of people power TV wtf
Tact of Magic never heard of it
FlingSmash that too
Dynamic Slash what is this?
And-Kensaku did this even get outside japan?
Pandora's Tower ok
Kiki Trick heheh
Xenoblade Chronicles good game
The Last Story good game, but that's two jrpg ip's in a row. Not sure if that's a good thing
Zangeki no Reginleiv what?

Wii-Ware I don't know any of those games, so I'm tempted to ask if they're minigame-style games or actual games that could make a decent series

Bonsai Barber
Rock N Roll Climber
PictureBook Games: Pop-Up Pursuit
You, Me and the Cubes
Eco Shooter: Plant 530
Snowpack Park
ThruSpace
Line Attack Heroes
Fluidity

Wii-U

P-100 ok
Panorama View never heard of it
Nintendo Land so a blend of other nintendo IP's is a new nintendo ip? smash may have a free pass, I doubt this does.
X not out yet

Game Boy Advance

Golden Sun OK
Magical Vacation okish
Napoleon dynamite?
Kuririn kururinpa? spotted that weird word in a magazine years ago, never heard it again
Horse Racing Creating Derby sounds shit
Stafy what?
Tomato Adventure lol
WarioWare, Inc.: Mega Microgame$ it's goddamn wario
Drill Dozer nah
Rhythm Tengoku import?
bit Generations who?

Nintendo DS

Polarium the tetris clone?
Nintendogs alright this is getting ridiculous
Jump Super Stars who?
Electroplankton that gimmicky game?
Big Brain Academy eh...ok?
Brain Age see...above?
Clubhouse Games how about a game that does not consist of minigames that can be found online
Magnetica who?
Elite Beat Agents cool
Hotel Dusk: Room 215 this is really nintendo's?
Trace Memory never heard of it
Master of Illusion never heard of it
Slide Adventure MAGKID what?
Soma Bringer what?
Jam with the Band what?
Fossil Fighters who?
Style Savvy how?
Glory of Heracles where?
Friend Collection haha nice one ninty
Walk with me! Do you know your walking routine? this must be the new mario killer
Cooking Guide: Can't Decide What To Eat? and this is the new zelda killer

Dsi never heard of those either
Aura Aura Climber
Art Academy
Kappa Trail
Pinball Pulse: The Ancient Beckons

Nintendo 3ds
Steel Diver don't know it

3DS Ware
Harmo Knight crap
Freakyforms: Your Creations, Alive! ?
Pushmo OK
Sakura Samurai: Art of the Sword don't know it
Dillon's Rolling Western don't know it
Ketzal's Corridors don't know it

So Nintendo does have a list of new IP's, but other than 5 or 6 series, the rest are garbage / minigame style / one-game series. I don't know if that's a good thing.

that list is pretty sad compared to sony and microsoftShoulderOfOrion

[QUOTE="ShoulderOfOrion"]that list is pretty sad compared to sony and microsoftYoshiYogurt

Let's go down the list:

Giftpia: Is not a Nintendo Ip, the creators where even looking for a ocmpany to publish it because Nintendo would not localize it for the U.S. If Nitnedo owned the Ip, they would not have been able to do that. Miyamoto was a producer of Giftpia; Cubivore is a Nintendo IP but Atlus published it outside of Japan; By that logic Demon's Souls isn't a Sony IP.

Odama: is not a Nintendo Ip, they asked Nintendo to publish it because no one else wanted to. They had made games on other systems before usually with low sales.

Endless Ocean: series was approached at nitnendo to publish the game. I mean, Arika, you should know who they are.

Flingsmash: Was an AQ Ip, which was made by Artoon and neede d a publisher as AQ was having hard times, which the Ip is buried (for now) since AQ went under. Nintendo contracted Artoon to make it.

Dynamic Slash: Was asked around for many publishers, but Nintedo decided to take it, not theirs, Nintendo even declined a lot of their games, recently D3 has been their main publisher.

And-Kensaku: Is not even really a game, and I don't think Nintendo really owns it, I would have to go through a couple japanese sites to be sure.

Pandoras Tower: Has nothing to do with nintendo, heck, Xseed brought it to NA or is going to. Same as Giftpia just because some other publisher brings it to North America doesn't mean that Nintendo doesn't own the IP.

Zangeki no Reginleiv: IS the exact same as Dynamic Flash, desperation is growing.

Bonsai Barber: Is not owned by Nintendo.

Wonderful 101/P-100 is most likely not going to be owned by nintedo, either way, it's not even out yet.

X: is also not out yet.

Napoleon: Is not a Nintendo Ip. No involvement.

Kuririn: Does not exist, if you mean Kuru Kuru Kururin, it was Nintendo after SEEKING a publisher.

Tomato Adventure: Now owned by Nintendo. Nintendo contracted Alpha Dream to make it.

Drill Dozer: Gamefreak owns the rights.

That's already 15 games off the list, shall we go further?Jakandsigz

Though one IP on that list that shouldn't belong is Glory of Heracles since it isn't a new IP Nintendo and Paon purchased it when Data East went under Paon is made up of many employees from Data East. The Glory of Heracles that Nintendo published is the 6 title in the series.

Nintendo and Paon also has the rights to Karnov, Chelnov (Atomic Runner), Vapor Trail, and Glory of Heracles.

In short, it's because people are ignorant and stupid fanboys.

reading the list for gamecube and Wii you can EASILY tell how many of those are casual games, mini game compilations and so on.  Or how they just are not really big quality titles.  People want characters who are new additions to the family.  Characters who can stand next to Link, Mario, and Samus.  

Jeez, the amount of damage control.nintendoboy16

It's pretty sad to be in a place where you imagine everyone is more dedicated to the hobby than most, and yet all they do is dismiss games for being obscure, or immediately label games they've never played as bad.

[QUOTE="ShoulderOfOrion"]that list is pretty sad compared to sony and microsoftYoshiYogurt

you donkey konga, luigi's mansion, xenoblade saga....they are offshoots of the same franchises.

handheld gets all the love, so how many of those benefit the wii u?

"Common sense of people power TV"

:lol:

Odama: is not a Nintendo Ip, they asked Nintendo to publish it because no one else wanted to. They had made games on other systems before usually with low sales.Jakandsigz

Wonderful 101/P-100 is most likely not going to be owned by nintedo, either way, it's not even out yet.Jakandsigz

*long list*

So Nintendo does have a list of new IP's, but other than 5 or 6 series, the rest are garbage / minigame style / one-game series. I don't know if that's a good thing.

IveDatedUrMom