@GrenadeLauncher said:
@heretrix said:
@GrenadeLauncher said:
So why did Insipid8 ignore the fact that XBL was easier to take down then?
Easier = 24 hours, apparently. Nothing to boast about that, matey.
Considering how much of the crap Xbone is dependent on as a selling point (pizza apps - pathetic) it's no surprise it needs to separate it all.
Who cares? Certainly not the people who still can't log into PSN.
The losers who go "muh servers" to justify the Xbone should.
Yeah, I can see how the Xbone's big game of 2014 being a total disaster could upset you, RR360OD.
'So why did Insipid8 ignore the fact that XBL was easier to take down then?'
Because this is not relevent when talking about how long it takes a company to Recover from such an attack you moron, don't get upset becuase it's obvious, yet again , that XBL has better security and recovery from attacks than PSN.
i am sorry dude but it's pretty obvious to anyone with half a brain and an ounce of common sense that XBL has better security So9ftware, more Servers to offload to when under attack and better online security staff.
You understand that with Azure MS has a TON more servers than SONY to absorb any Damage from a DDOS attack right.
You guys are idiots if you think SONY will EVER be able to recover farm an attack as fast as MS, Microsoft invented the First useable browser for the internet and where doing online gaming before SONY even realized that online gaming existed.
It's called experience mate and MS have mmore experience of online gaming in there little finger than SONY has in there entire company.
I also find it funny that you cows will call MS out over the tiniest little thing yet you defend SONY for using out of date servers and security.
Hypocrites to the last man you cows.
Log in to comment