LMAO Skyrim is freaking terrible!

  • 147 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for AzatiS
AzatiS

14969

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#101  Edited By AzatiS
Member since 2004 • 14969 Posts

@demi0227_basic said:
@Juub1990 said:

@demi0227_basic: Oh great an appeal to popularity fallacy.

If the point of a video game is to "entertain," and most people find a game "entertaining," perhaps you don't understand that an obscure and differing view doesn't yield any type of fallacy related to popular appeal. There's a degree to with subjectivity through a large part of the popular view becomes objective. Is this painting "good?" What many feel, especially with familiarity with the subject, ends up being generally accurate. Hence why metascore's are a better metric, generally speaking, to establish if somebody may like a particular thing.

I agree with you but dont forget that hype and marketing moving the sheep in this world including video games. You see mediocre games that offering one of the same doing epicly good in sales and in reception in general from gamers and media just because coming from very popular developers or publishers ( check Diablo3 , Destiny and many more are fine examples.

So sometimes you need to see games of what they really are , what they offering versus all others games in same genres and so many other things to consider it great imho.

All in all im in for metacritic average myself but i think industry is moving most out of loyalty and marketing other actually quality.

Look how PAth of exile excels in every single aspect for its genre vs Diablo 3 yet Diablo 3 made record sales and scored great in every site.

Check how destiny considered a crap when its rival WARFRAME did literally everything better for free yet destiny managed to sell well and having bigger population and reception.

Rename Heroes of the storm to whatever name and release it under other publisher than Blizzard and let me know how many of Blizzard fanboys would even bother with it praising it as the best moba ever etc. Do the same for games like Hearthstone and Diablo 3 and tell me if those games would have scored as good or would ever have tens of millions owners.

We all know that they wouldnt. And thats where marketing , brand loyalty, nostalgia and hype comes in.

Gamers and everyone should think out of the box for once imho. Not only for video games but for everything that is out there. Thats what i think. Be open minded about the game you suppose you want to spend money on and let your logic , taste and point of view dictate if you really like something and not if its a Blizzard game or Sony game or theres huge hype around it in media or youre a fanboy blabla.

Avatar image for Ballroompirate
Ballroompirate

26695

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#102 Ballroompirate
Member since 2005 • 26695 Posts

@Juub1990 said:

@Ballroompirate: lol the irony of your posts.

Still better than 100% of your trash posts/topics

Oh look topic 1,354 of "let's talk about how shit Skyrim is", when in reality it's one of the most successful games. You don't like it cool no one gives a ****.

Avatar image for Juub1990
Juub1990

12622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#103 Juub1990
Member since 2013 • 12622 Posts

@Ballroompirate: The fact you're bumping my thread and throwing a fit proves you're wrong.

Avatar image for Ballroompirate
Ballroompirate

26695

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#104 Ballroompirate
Member since 2005 • 26695 Posts

@Juub1990 said:

@Ballroompirate: The fact you're bumping my thread and throwing a fit proves you're wrong.

Throwing a fit? lol nah I enjoying calling out dumbasses

Avatar image for Juub1990
Juub1990

12622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#105  Edited By Juub1990
Member since 2013 • 12622 Posts

@Ballroompirate: Well yeah you're all swearing and bitching. Just don't respond to the thread. Not only you won't give activity to a topic you dislike but you'll also avoid looking like an idiot. Win-win.

Avatar image for blueinheaven
blueinheaven

5567

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#106  Edited By blueinheaven
Member since 2008 • 5567 Posts

@nintendoboy16 said:
@blueinheaven said:
@glez13 said:

Bethesda "RPGs" have never been good for being good RPGs, they also always suffer from bad combat(Fallout 4 is probably the only exception). They are good because they offer a huge big world to explore which results in an experience greater than the sum of it's parts.

Even the one that nowadays people seem to consider a good TES game, Morrowind, is actually an awful RPG, with awful dialogue and quests, and brain-dead combat. The only thing that saves it is that it doesn't hold your hand, it had some unique artistic ideas, and like I said the signature Bethesda open world exploration.

Morrowind was a fantastic RPG okay the combat was functional at best but everywhere you went there was lore and books and a million ways to find out more about the world you were in and the story was at least atmospheric and reaching instead of 'go to loads of waypoints just because then hit the end button' like Oblivion or Skyrim. It was far better than any similar RPG of its time actually there weren't any when it comes right down to it.

Oblivion is an insomniac's dream come true (not that they dream much haha) and Skyrim is just an RPG the way Bethesda thinks RPG's work and they're right if you go back 20 years to terrible production values and horrible dialogue but Oblivion and Skyrim are just piss poor contributions to the genre that Morrowind actually set on fire.

"functional at best" Coming from Morrowind... right. I'm sorry, but it's hardly what I call functional when it's an action RPG that relies on tabletop style combat. I understand it for turn based RPG's like classic Fallout, Final Fantasy, Pokemon, Harry Potter GBC, etc. But for an action RPG? Lol no. It feels broken as hell. Sure, Oblivion and Skyrim's combat weren't great, but at least I get the feeling of hitting something.

And, for me. Playing Morrowind for the first time after playing Oblivion and Skyrim is like starting Goldeneye and Perfect Dark after playing Halo and CoD4.

Morrowind combat really wasn't that bad for the time it was released. I don't know what you expected playing later Elder Scrolls games then going back to a really old one of course it will seem dated. That said, Morrowind can be modded heavily to update it to a huge degree if you spend some time going through mods. Even the combat can be 'fixed' with mods.

In fact most of the Elder Scrolls hate on this thread I suspect is coming from people who played Oblivion and/or Skyrim on console where the endless amateurish drudgery is built into the games and can not be addressed.

Avatar image for Ballroompirate
Ballroompirate

26695

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#107 Ballroompirate
Member since 2005 • 26695 Posts

@Juub1990 said:

@Ballroompirate: Well yeah you're all swearing and bitching. Just don't respond to the thread. Not only you won't give activity to a topic you dislike but you'll also avoid looking like an idiot. Win-win.

If someone acts like a dumbass, I'm calling them a dumbass, also shit isn't against the tos/censor word anymore so I don't GAF. Also it's hard to make myself look stupid when I don't make threads bashing -insert highly praised game and call it terrible- which if it was terrible, then it would be terrible but a game that has sold over 20 million copies is I don't know about you or your absurd out of this world definition of "terrible",but Skyrim is not terrible, hey you don't like it good for here's a shiny sticker that says "I'm special". It must just get your panties in a bunch when you see someone praise Skyrim, ether that or you like to troll people which I wouldn't be calling someone a idiot if I made a thread trying to troll people.

So yea pretend you think you pissed me off somehow when in reality, I LOVE calling out dumbasses who think they are the shit, I do this crap 8 hours a day at work.

Avatar image for Ross_the_Boss6
Ross_the_Boss6

4056

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#108 Ross_the_Boss6
Member since 2009 • 4056 Posts

What year is this

Avatar image for Juub1990
Juub1990

12622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#109 Juub1990
Member since 2013 • 12622 Posts
@Ballroompirate said:

If someone acts like a dumbass, I'm calling them a dumbass, also shit isn't against the tos/censor word anymore so I don't GAF. Also it's hard to make myself look stupid when I don't make threads bashing -insert highly praised game and call it terrible- which if it was terrible, then it would be terrible but a game that has sold over 20 million copies is I don't know about you or your absurd out of this world definition of "terrible",but Skyrim is not terrible, hey you don't like it good for here's a shiny sticker that says "I'm special". It must just get your panties in a bunch when you see someone praise Skyrim, ether that or you like to troll people which I wouldn't be calling someone a idiot if I made a thread trying to troll people.

So yea pretend you think you pissed me off somehow when in reality, I LOVE calling out dumbasses who think they are the shit, I do this crap 8 hours a day at work.

So you're basically telling me I shouldn't have an opinion that disagrees with the masses and if I disagree with them and voice said opinion, I'm an idiot? I'm a dumbass because I think Skyrim is a terrible game, correct? Never mind the fact I gave reasons in the OP and plenty others have agreed and elaborated upon these reasons . Since reviews highly praised that game and it sold a lot, anybody daring to think it's a bad game is a fool who should shut the hell up? I should just follow the herd, think the game is good or shut my trap and forfeit my right to freedom of speech. That's what I got from your post.

Avatar image for Jebus213
Jebus213

10056

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#110  Edited By Jebus213
Member since 2010 • 10056 Posts

I don't see how anyone can defend a bland lifeless open world, a shallow story and terrible combat.

I want those 30 hours of my life back.

Avatar image for jun_aka_pekto
jun_aka_pekto

25255

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#111 jun_aka_pekto
Member since 2010 • 25255 Posts
@Jebus213 said:

I don't see how anyone can defend a bland lifeless open world, a shallow story and terrible combat.

I want those 30 hours of my life back.

Kinda like hanging out here in GS. I want my brain cells back. But, it's not going to happen. ;)

Avatar image for waahahah
waahahah

2462

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 5

#112 waahahah
Member since 2014 • 2462 Posts

@MBirdy88 said:

Well said.

Elder Scrolls games are not about movie-level presentation in an RPG, it's just about being able to do what you want in a fantasy universe, where things like Acting/Animation is not the priority, but the living/breathing setup of the characters and world...

That being said however, BETHESDA have been using an outdated engine for far too long, for a company that has had such high success in both critic and sales, their commitment to improving their production values has been p*ss poor....

I'm really hoping we havn't heard about the next Elder Scrolls because they are finally writing a new engine from scratch or at least heavily modifying to the point where its barely recognisable compared to their previous works.

The problem is the concept is just hard to do, where persistence of everything matters and is memory intensive. Even if they rewrite the engine, unless the design the game without as much persistence then similar issues will arise with a very high probability.

Solving issues with the current engine is far more productive.

Avatar image for Litchie
Litchie

36121

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#113  Edited By Litchie
Member since 2003 • 36121 Posts

@Gallowhand: Great post dude. Same here, couldn't really get into Witcher. Had great times with Bethesda's games.

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#114 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts

And that's why we have mods.

Avatar image for themajormayor
themajormayor

25729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#115  Edited By themajormayor
Member since 2011 • 25729 Posts

Nice atmosphere though

Avatar image for trollhunter2
trollhunter2

2054

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#116 trollhunter2
Member since 2012 • 2054 Posts

I noticed it like 7 or so years ago. Boring game, dull combat.

Avatar image for DragonfireXZ95
DragonfireXZ95

26716

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#117 DragonfireXZ95
Member since 2005 • 26716 Posts

@blueinheaven said:
@nintendoboy16 said:
@blueinheaven said:
@glez13 said:

Bethesda "RPGs" have never been good for being good RPGs, they also always suffer from bad combat(Fallout 4 is probably the only exception). They are good because they offer a huge big world to explore which results in an experience greater than the sum of it's parts.

Even the one that nowadays people seem to consider a good TES game, Morrowind, is actually an awful RPG, with awful dialogue and quests, and brain-dead combat. The only thing that saves it is that it doesn't hold your hand, it had some unique artistic ideas, and like I said the signature Bethesda open world exploration.

Morrowind was a fantastic RPG okay the combat was functional at best but everywhere you went there was lore and books and a million ways to find out more about the world you were in and the story was at least atmospheric and reaching instead of 'go to loads of waypoints just because then hit the end button' like Oblivion or Skyrim. It was far better than any similar RPG of its time actually there weren't any when it comes right down to it.

Oblivion is an insomniac's dream come true (not that they dream much haha) and Skyrim is just an RPG the way Bethesda thinks RPG's work and they're right if you go back 20 years to terrible production values and horrible dialogue but Oblivion and Skyrim are just piss poor contributions to the genre that Morrowind actually set on fire.

"functional at best" Coming from Morrowind... right. I'm sorry, but it's hardly what I call functional when it's an action RPG that relies on tabletop style combat. I understand it for turn based RPG's like classic Fallout, Final Fantasy, Pokemon, Harry Potter GBC, etc. But for an action RPG? Lol no. It feels broken as hell. Sure, Oblivion and Skyrim's combat weren't great, but at least I get the feeling of hitting something.

And, for me. Playing Morrowind for the first time after playing Oblivion and Skyrim is like starting Goldeneye and Perfect Dark after playing Halo and CoD4.

Morrowind combat really wasn't that bad for the time it was released. I don't know what you expected playing later Elder Scrolls games then going back to a really old one of course it will seem dated. That said, Morrowind can be modded heavily to update it to a huge degree if you spend some time going through mods. Even the combat can be 'fixed' with mods.

In fact most of the Elder Scrolls hate on this thread I suspect is coming from people who played Oblivion and/or Skyrim on console where the endless amateurish drudgery is built into the games and can not be addressed.

Most of us actually play on PC with mods, we just call it like we sees it. A spade is a spade, even if it's a broken down piece of shite. Lol

Me, for example, I mod the hell out of Bethesda games. I went back to Morrowind and did the same thing. And yes, the combat did kind of suck, and it was fixed with mods, but I'll still talk about how crappy it was. Same with how crappy the combat, dialogue, story, characters, graphics, etc. are in the newer Bethesda games like Skyrim and Fallout 4.

Much of it can be fixed, but the dialogue and story is something that modders won't bother to work on. They'll just create their own quests and stories, which is understandable, after all. That doesn't mean that many of us don't already mod the shit out of it, though.

Avatar image for bussinrounds
bussinrounds

3324

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#118 bussinrounds
Member since 2009 • 3324 Posts

Best mods for shit like Oblivion/Skyrim (and the only way I'd go near these games) are the complete overhaul ones like Nehrim, Requiem & Enderal.

Avatar image for jhcho2
jhcho2

5103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 2

#119 jhcho2
Member since 2004 • 5103 Posts

Skyrim isn't a shit game by any stretch of imagination. The only problem with the game is that there have been more recent games which did individual aspects of Skyrim better. Souls games have basically almost perfected a combat system for open world games (not trying to get into the semantics of open world here). Witcher 3 almost perfected the side/main quest system for an open world game. Witcher 3 and Horizon Zero Dawn both set a new bar for facial animations. Horizon Zero Dawn set quite a high bar for open world encounters.

After experiencing the best of what the aforementioned games have to offer, I can see why people today will feel like Skyrim is just a mediocre jack-of-all-trades. It has all the ingredients of what a good game needs, but never excels in any one of them in particular.

Avatar image for deactivated-5acbb9993d0bd
deactivated-5acbb9993d0bd

12449

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#120 deactivated-5acbb9993d0bd
Member since 2012 • 12449 Posts

@jhcho2 said:

Skyrim isn't a shit game by any stretch of imagination. The only problem with the game is that there have been more recent games which did individual aspects of Skyrim better. Souls games have basically almost perfected a combat system for open world games (not trying to get into the semantics of open world here). Witcher 3 almost perfected the side/main quest system for an open world game. Witcher 3 and Horizon Zero Dawn both set a new bar for facial animations. Horizon Zero Dawn set quite a high bar for open world encounters.

After experiencing the best of what the aforementioned games have to offer, I can see why people today will feel like Skyrim is just a mediocre jack-of-all-trades. It has all the ingredients of what a good game needs, but never excels in any one of them in particular.

Apples and Oranges comparing Dark Souls combat to Elder Scrolls.

That would be like directly comparing First Person Shooters to 3rd Person shooters...

People need to remember that Elder Scrolls is first and foremost a 1st person perspective game with a barely functioning 3rd person. I never want that to change, I want far more strides to perfect 1st Person combat, its simply more immersive imo.

But yea, I see the overall point.

Avatar image for stuff238
stuff238

3284

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#121 stuff238
Member since 2012 • 3284 Posts

Some games age and get worse over time.

When it released I probably would have given it 9/10. Maybe higher in 2011.

In 2017, I find it more of a 8/10 game. Better games like Witcher 3 came out and now going back to Skyrim 6 years later is hard.

I got through the opening and turned it off. I just didn't feel like exploring.

Avatar image for deactivated-5c746fddbe486
deactivated-5c746fddbe486

193

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

#123  Edited By deactivated-5c746fddbe486
Member since 2017 • 193 Posts

Bethesda is like Naughty Dog they release the same shit to critical acclaim no matter how bad the game is

Avatar image for Juub1990
Juub1990

12622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#124 Juub1990
Member since 2013 • 12622 Posts

@tibua: At least Naughty Dog games work.

Avatar image for Sam3231
Sam3231

3221

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 313

User Lists: 0

#125 Sam3231  Online
Member since 2008 • 3221 Posts

Yep Skyrim is fucking terrible. But I'm sure you'll find plenty of dudes that don't get haircuts to tell you different.

Avatar image for spike6958
spike6958

6701

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#126  Edited By spike6958
Member since 2005 • 6701 Posts

@Juub1990 said:

@tibua: At least Naughty Dog games work.

At least Bethesda's games have gameplay.

Avatar image for GunSmith1_basic
GunSmith1_basic

10548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 21

User Lists: 0

#127 GunSmith1_basic
Member since 2002 • 10548 Posts

If you are into Bethesda games, you are there to be immersed in a big world that feels lived-in. It's about exploring.

But yes, to be fair, Bethesda games have some of the worst writing in video games. A lot of that is the challenge of getting all that done while the devs focus is so heavily on the world. It's also easier to make a well-contained set piece when the game is small and the experience is tightly controlled. It's also true that their writers don't have much skill. There aren't great themes going on, and the characters are pretty flat.

I still love the open world genre above all others. I recognize the limitations in all the games in this genre. They are as the cliche goes, "jack of all trades and a master of none", but imo there is an emergent quality that appears with all these diverse elements blended together.

Avatar image for Juub1990
Juub1990

12622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#128  Edited By Juub1990
Member since 2013 • 12622 Posts

@GunSmith1_basic said:

If you are into Bethesda games, you are there to be immersed in a big world that feels lived-in. It's about exploring.

But yes, to be fair, Bethesda games have some of the worst writing in video games. A lot of that is the challenge of getting all that done while the devs focus is so heavily on the world. It's also easier to make a well-contained set piece when the game is small and the experience is tightly controlled. It's also true that their writers don't have much skill. There aren't great themes going on, and the characters are pretty flat.

I still love the open world genre above all others. I recognize the limitations in all the games in this genre. They are as the cliche goes, "jack of all trades and a master of none", but imo there is an emergent quality that appears with all these diverse elements blended together.

They should hire New Vegas writers.

Avatar image for t0rtured0ct0r
t0rtured0ct0r

20

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#129  Edited By t0rtured0ct0r
Member since 2017 • 20 Posts

Combat is lacking like any Bethesda game but it has a great story.

Avatar image for thehig1
thehig1

7555

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 5

#130 thehig1
Member since 2014 • 7555 Posts

@Juub1990: I agree with what you said, but still love skyrim.

I can get so immersed into the world, and at times it's so bad it's actaully good :)

Avatar image for DragonfireXZ95
DragonfireXZ95

26716

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#131 DragonfireXZ95
Member since 2005 • 26716 Posts

@t0rtured0ct0r said:

Combat is lacking like any Bethesda game but it has a great story.

No. No, it doesn't. Lol It's passable at best, but nowhere near great.

Avatar image for Juub1990
Juub1990

12622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#132 Juub1990
Member since 2013 • 12622 Posts

@t0rtured0ct0r said:

Combat is lacking like any Bethesda game but it has a great story.

@DragonfireXZ95 said:

No. No, it doesn't. Lol It's passable at best, but nowhere near great.

What? The story is complete shit lol. The plot isn't actually terrible but Bethesda's writers are a bunch of amateurs.

Avatar image for uninspiredcup
uninspiredcup

62865

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 86

User Lists: 2

#133  Edited By uninspiredcup
Member since 2013 • 62865 Posts

@Juub1990 said:
@t0rtured0ct0r said:

Combat is lacking like any Bethesda game but it has a great story.

@DragonfireXZ95 said:

No. No, it doesn't. Lol It's passable at best, but nowhere near great.

What? The story is complete shit lol. The plot isn't actually terrible but Bethesda's writers are a bunch of amateurs.

The lore books are actually very good and a few of the side quests in particular directly tie into them quite well.

There's a quest regarding revisionist history and actual history that is quite exceptional, better than anything in the Witcher.

And honestly, anyone shitting on it's combat while praising the Witcher 1, 2 or 3 are either deluded or hypocritical.

Skyrim has some sensible design. If you want to apply a poison potion for example, you can pause the game.

In the Witcher 1/2 you have to prepare before it, for specific creatures using the power of Nostradamus, or dying and loading up again. It's stupid. Bethesda realized this, CDP didn't.

Avatar image for Juub1990
Juub1990

12622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#134 Juub1990
Member since 2013 • 12622 Posts

@uninspiredcup said:

And honestly, anyone shitting on it's combat while praising the Witcher 1, 2 or 3 are either deluded or hypocritical.

Never praised The Witcher's combat which I think is mediocre at best and bad at worst.

Avatar image for uninspiredcup
uninspiredcup

62865

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 86

User Lists: 2

#135  Edited By uninspiredcup
Member since 2013 • 62865 Posts

@Juub1990 said:
@uninspiredcup said:

And honestly, anyone shitting on it's combat while praising the Witcher 1, 2 or 3 are either deluded or hypocritical.

Never praised The Witcher's combat which I think is mediocre at best and bad at worst.

I didn't cite you specifically. Anyone (and they do) will bark to the heavens about The Witcher while refusing to give Skyrim an inch.

Typical gamer nonsense.

Avatar image for DragonfireXZ95
DragonfireXZ95

26716

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#136 DragonfireXZ95
Member since 2005 • 26716 Posts

@Juub1990 said:
@t0rtured0ct0r said:

Combat is lacking like any Bethesda game but it has a great story.

@DragonfireXZ95 said:

No. No, it doesn't. Lol It's passable at best, but nowhere near great.

What? The story is complete shit lol. The plot isn't actually terrible but Bethesda's writers are a bunch of amateurs.

Yeah, that's what I meant. The plot is passable at best. The writing itself is just downright atrocious. We're agreed there.

Most of the characters are really funny, too(not in the haha way). Like, one of them refuses to do something, and then all of a sudden they do a 180 and go along with whatever it is you want without any actual recourse. They actually remind me of the characters in the movie The Room.

Avatar image for WhiteLynx
WhiteLynx

45

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#137 WhiteLynx
Member since 2005 • 45 Posts

Skyrim is playable with mods, but Steam's unauthorized updates ruined all mods compatibility with every their needless update. Therefore I left any attempts to finish the game. ) Currently Steam is blocked on my firewall, but I never return to Skyrim. Just being lazy. )

Avatar image for DragonfireXZ95
DragonfireXZ95

26716

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#138  Edited By DragonfireXZ95
Member since 2005 • 26716 Posts

@WhiteLynx said:

Skyrim is playable with mods, but Steam's unauthorized updates ruined all mods compatibility with every their needless update. Therefore I left any attempts to finish the game. ) Currently Steam is blocked on my firewall, but I never return to Skyrim. Just being lazy. )

You just set it to update manually(when game is launched) in Steam and then only ever launch it using SKSE or F4SE for Fallout 4. Of course, you can't do that with the special edition since the script extender isn't out yet, but this works. I'm currently doing this for Fallout 4 since I don't want their stupid creation club update to break F4SE.

Avatar image for dino7c
dino7c

533

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#139  Edited By dino7c
Member since 2005 • 533 Posts

Skyrim is like a popular band...

They are good, maybe overplayed/over hyped....they don't suck but some people like to be contrary and not enjoy because most others do

If you think Skyrim is terrible you haven't played any terrible games

Avatar image for notacat
NotACat

6

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#140 NotACat
Member since 2017 • 6 Posts

Let's not do that today.

Avatar image for deactivated-5e5d7e6d61227
deactivated-5e5d7e6d61227

619

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#141 deactivated-5e5d7e6d61227
Member since 2009 • 619 Posts

***slow clap*** You hit the nail on the head with this response. I tried playing the Witcher games too, wasn't a fan either.

@Gallowhand said:

I often see comparison's between The Witcher 3 and games like Skyrim. Of course some of the writing in the Witcher games is better, because for one thing the developer doesn't have to think or worry about the main protagonist being anything other than the predefined character, Geralt the Witcher with swords and magic. All of the dialogue and responses to you, as the player, are therefore centred around the lore of that occupation and that central character's reputation. By contrast, Bethesda has to cater to not only different genders and races of the main protagonist, but also juggle what kind of responses people in the world would make dependent on which faction you've chosen, or how the way you've played the game is perceived. I would argue it is much harder to write appropriate responses when dealing with a main character that is so variable and fluid.

That aside, yes, some of the quest dialogue and delivery in Bethesda's games (not just Skyrim) can be cringe-worthy at times, and there are a few examples that can be highlighted, like the one posted by the OP. I also feel that sometimes Bethesda has a great idea but does not go far enough with it to the logical conclusion, or allow appropriate long-lasting consequences to actions. They tend to shy away from that, which is a shame. On the other hand, I've completed many quests in Skyrim where I felt the voice acting and dialogue was just fine, and there are a number of memorable characters as a result of that. I've found many of the quests to be enjoyable, and the faction quest lines in particular were well done. I would also say that at least Bethesda tries to offer a decent variety of questing and some interesting side stories to cater to different play styles.

When it comes to combat and/or how you interact with a game, that is always going to be a matter of personal preference. Some prefer a more rigid approach that focuses more on story, while others prefer more freedom and fluidity of gameplay.

Speaking of personal preference, I've never finished a Witcher game. I've tried many times but always lose interest. Why? Because I dislike the central character Geralt and cannot empathise with him in any way. I don't like the way he looks, the way he speaks, or the fact that you're a Witcher and nothing else. If you want to play a predefined 'role' that's fine, but it's not what I look for in a role playing game. I never finished the game Two Worlds 2 for the same reason. Perhaps it's due to my background playing a lot of D&D games back in the day, and having that freedom of choice regarding race/class/gender. Others will intensely disagree, and that's fine, but personally I've had more actual 'role playing' experiences in Bethesda's games than any other, creating many different characters, each of whom I've played in different ways. I like that freedom of expression through gameplay.

Avatar image for Heil68
Heil68

60833

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#142 Heil68
Member since 2004 • 60833 Posts

I loved it at the time and beat it on PC and 360 and was 1 achievement away from perfect score. I dont mind the bugs in a huge open world RPG.

Avatar image for WhiteLynx
WhiteLynx

45

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#143 WhiteLynx
Member since 2005 • 45 Posts

@DragonfireXZ95:

@DragonfireXZ95 said:
@WhiteLynx said:

Skyrim is playable with mods, but Steam's unauthorized updates

You just set it to update manually(when game is launched) in Steam

Steam perform updates anyway. The only way to deny steam - is to block it using firewall. )

Avatar image for trugs26
trugs26

7541

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#144 trugs26
Member since 2004 • 7541 Posts

I played it for the first time fairly recently. Maybe a year ago. It was pretty awesome imo. Sure it's rough around the edges, but what it aims to do well, it does very well.

Avatar image for DragonfireXZ95
DragonfireXZ95

26716

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#145 DragonfireXZ95
Member since 2005 • 26716 Posts

@WhiteLynx said:

@DragonfireXZ95:

@DragonfireXZ95 said:
@WhiteLynx said:

Skyrim is playable with mods, but Steam's unauthorized updates

You just set it to update manually(when game is launched) in Steam

Steam perform updates anyway. The only way to deny steam - is to block it using firewall. )

Nah.

Avatar image for ivangrozny
IvanGrozny

1939

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#147 IvanGrozny
Member since 2015 • 1939 Posts

Oh wow someone dug up a 3 year old thread. A true relic of the past.

Avatar image for BlackShirt20
BlackShirt20

2631

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#148 BlackShirt20
Member since 2005 • 2631 Posts

What a sad life someone lives when they save threads from 3 years ago.

Avatar image for lebanese_boy
lebanese_boy

18050

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#150 lebanese_boy
Member since 2003 • 18050 Posts

This thread is so old it had charizard1605 in it, whatever happened to him?