Bu bu but the PS3 is teh supa computer!
This topic is locked from further discussion.
AAA on Gamerankings, an aggregrate of review sites which is closer to the real quality than one man's opinion.
thrones
Really? I could've sworn each game is AAA on gamerankings...
sam280992
gamerankings is an aggregate of reviews including platform specific magazines and fansites. Besides this is Gamespot so we go by gamespot scores. If you want to go by gamerankings aggregate go to their site
Bu bu but the PS3 is teh supa computer!
ReverseCycology
you act as if the xbox360 doesnt produce low res textures also :| tehh fanboy
lol guess what buddy? I dont careshaggyaz
I would if I was only a console gamer. I would be asking Sony and Microsoft what were they thinking when they put a puny amount of ram in their consoles. I dont mean what the TC said but he has a valid point. Higher resolution textures are missing in a lot of these games that are on the 360 and PC. Its also kind of sad since you can get 2 gigs of ram with good timings for $35 on newegg. I would have rather spent the $35 more on my console for high resolution textures and higher resolutions in general.
Dont kid cows.Deep withion you know you would spend $40 for more RAM to get crazy textures in MGS4.You know that now just let it out already.:lol:Spybot_9And yet I would still take console gaming over PC gaming anyday.
Bu bu teh graphics doesnt mean everything teh gameplay does!:cry:Spybot_9
I know I know that but it still sucks hard.I mean my graphics card has more VRAM then the total RAM in PS3.:lol:Spybot_9
I can play crysis with very high textures without breaking a sweat for that reason.8)Spybot_9
Now tell me consolietes,would you like to have the "option" of upgrading your RAM for $40 and get better textures in MGS4 and future games?Nah dont kid yourself you would in a hearbeat and you know it as well.:lol:Spybot_9
Too bad you cant upgrade a console.:(Spybot_9
Look dude, you can bash this game all you want. But on June 12 nothing is gonna stop me from enjoying this game. Ive been waiting for it since 2005. Im not gonna walk around and stare at everywall 2 inches away, no, im gonna play the hell out of it, while you sit here and bash it. kool-aids
You're not going to stare at wall up close? But... why?!?
[QUOTE="kool-aids"]Look dude, you can bash this game all you want. But on June 12 nothing is gonna stop me from enjoying this game. Ive been waiting for it since 2005. Im not gonna walk around and stare at everywall 2 inches away, no, im gonna play the hell out of it, while you sit here and bash it. Doctor-Salvador
You're not going to stare at wall up close? But... why?!?
Because I dont care how low res the textures are.
[QUOTE="Doctor-Salvador"][QUOTE="kool-aids"]Look dude, you can bash this game all you want. But on June 12 nothing is gonna stop me from enjoying this game. Ive been waiting for it since 2005. Im not gonna walk around and stare at everywall 2 inches away, no, im gonna play the hell out of it, while you sit here and bash it. kool-aids
You're not going to stare at wall up close? But... why?!?
Because I dont care how low res the textures are.
MGS fans don't give a crap how good or how bad this game looks. We just want to experience it and find out the next chapter of the story.
[QUOTE="kool-aids"][QUOTE="Doctor-Salvador"][QUOTE="kool-aids"]Look dude, you can bash this game all you want. But on June 12 nothing is gonna stop me from enjoying this game. Ive been waiting for it since 2005. Im not gonna walk around and stare at everywall 2 inches away, no, im gonna play the hell out of it, while you sit here and bash it. NAPK1NS
You're not going to stare at wall up close? But... why?!?
Because I dont care how low res the textures are.
MGS fans don't give a crap how good or how bad this game looks. We just want to experience it and find out the next chapter of the story.
I was actually being sarcastic.
Bu bu teh graphics doesnt mean everything teh gameplay does!:cry:
I know I know that but it still sucks hard.I mean my graphics card has more VRAM then the total RAM in PS3.:lol:
I can play crysis with very high textures without breaking a sweat for that reason.8)
Now tell me consolietes,would you like to have the "option" of upgrading your RAM for $40 and get better textures in MGS4 and future games?Nah dont kid yourself you would in a hearbeat and you know it as well.:lol:
Too bad you cant upgrade a console.:(
Spybot_9
Most gamers do not play textures...
[QUOTE="thrones"]AAA on Gamerankings, an aggregrate of review sites which is closer to the real quality than one man's opinion.
vicmackey39
Really? I could've sworn each game is AAA on gamerankings...
sam280992
gamerankings is an aggregate of reviews including platform specific magazines and fansites. Besides this is Gamespot so we go by gamespot scores. If you want to go by gamerankings aggregate go to their site
LOL WE? no theres only you and probably another 3 people, and it was decided to use gamerankings, there was a huge poll made about it and gamerankings one... But you wouldn't know anything about that.
[quote="Spybot_9"]I can play crysis with very high textures without breaking a sweat for that reason.8)blitzcloud
[QUOTE="Spybot_9"][QUOTE="bobbetybob"][QUOTE="SSJ_Nega"]Reality sucks I know.MGS4 graphics suck.[QUOTE="Spybot_9"][QUOTE="SSJ_Nega"]Shoo troll, shoo :xPC_X360
Admittedly the textures are poor, but if you think the overall graphics are bad then you're either mad, or spoiled by crysis' graphics.
The second, Hermits need to face that apart from Crysis most of their games don't look much better than consoles best looking games, and that Crysis only looks so good because you need to upgrade your computer to play it on the best settings.
I bought my computer in jan 2007 and I didnt have to upgrade for crysis and I play it fine in very high settings.We know:roll:
Whatever.:roll:Well the only game that benefits from overclocking right now is crysis so whenever I want to play crysis,I run the crysis profile from rivatuner.When games become more and more demanding,i'll give it a permanent overclock.dude. overclock it.
thegoldenpoo
BTW it's a factory Oced card but still has quite a bit headroom for ocing.
The old GTS chips have a MASSIVE overclocking headroom.Those old GTS chips have trouble running Crysis on High. I find your statements near impossible to belive.
Marka1700
The benchmarks you see are running the old GTS with it's stock speeds which are really slow,the reason being that nvdia wanted to justify the extra cost for the GTX with dominance in benchmarks.In reality both the GTS and GTX can run the SAME speeds.Ofcourse the GTX is better but not by as much as benchmarks would lead you to believe.
An overclocked 8800GTS 640MB=Overclocked 8800GT and here's the proof for that.
[QUOTE="jasonharris48"][QUOTE="Spybot_9"]Dont kid cows.Deep withion you know you would spend $40 for more RAM to get crazy textures in MGS4.You know that now just let it out already.:lol:Spybot_9And yet I would still take console gaming over PC gaming anyday.Ok so?? Ok so whats the whole point of this topic?
[QUOTE="Marka1700"]The old GTS chips have a MASSIVE overclocking headroom.Those old GTS chips have trouble running Crysis on High. I find your statements near impossible to belive.
Spybot_9
The benchmarks you see are running the old GTS with it's stock speeds which are really slow,the reason being that nvdia wanted to justify the extra cost for the GTX with dominance in benchmarks.In reality both the GTS and GTX can run the SAME speeds.Ofcourse the GTX is better but not by as much as benchmarks would lead you to believe.
An overclocked 8800GTS 640MB=Overclocked 8800GT and here's the proof for that.
WHAT!!!! GTX will kill any GTS 640mb at high resolution.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment