Lol...Nearly all multiplat games at E3 were running on PC, with 360 controllers

You wany to know what I loath? I loath SNOBBY PC elitiests such as yourself. I loath hermits who have their noses so far up in the air, their head falls backwards and off their shoulders. Realistically, HOW many people out there right now have the hardware to run Watchdogs and Star Wars. We are talking about a very small percentage of PC gamers being able to run those games. So yeah, there are PC parts out there now, that can run them, BUT not many people will have the parts to do so. Also, I guess going by console logic, a PC becomes next gen, every time hardware is upgraded. LOL so if you're a PC gamer, I guess you can start your own next gen at any time, BUT you have to wait for a console's next gen, nefore you start to see TRUE next gen games taking advantage of the advancement in tech, as Watchdogs and StarWars CLEARLY fall into"nexf gen" games as suchhardmicro

[QUOTE="hardmicro"]You wany to know what I loath? I loath SNOBBY PC elitiests such as yourself. I loath hermits who have their noses so far up in the air, their head falls backwards and off their shoulders. Realistically, HOW many people out there right now have the hardware to run Watchdogs and Star Wars. We are talking about a very small percentage of PC gamers being able to run those games. So yeah, there are PC parts out there now, that can run them, BUT not many people will have the parts to do so. Also, I guess going by console logic, a PC becomes next gen, every time hardware is upgraded. LOL so if you're a PC gamer, I guess you can start your own next gen at any time, BUT you have to wait for a console's next gen, nefore you start to see TRUE next gen games taking advantage of the advancement in tech, as Watchdogs and StarWars CLEARLY fall into"nexf gen" games as suchmitu123

Sure they run on PC, they are all prototypes of the games that will come for consoles at launch in late 2013 and forward

For example Agnes demo is a glimpse of what FF15 on xbox 720 and PS4 will look like

PC is where all games are made anyway, showing a game on PC does not mean it will appear on PC

FF is console only for example, Gears 5 will be the same etc

loosingENDS

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

[QUOTE="hardmicro"]You wany to know what I loath? I loath SNOBBY PC elitiests such as yourself. I loath hermits who have their noses so far up in the air, their head falls backwards and off their shoulders. Realistically, HOW many people out there right now have the hardware to run Watchdogs and Star Wars. We are talking about a very small percentage of PC gamers being able to run those games. So yeah, there are PC parts out there now, that can run them, BUT not many people will have the parts to do so. Also, I guess going by console logic, a PC becomes next gen, every time hardware is upgraded. LOL so if you're a PC gamer, I guess you can start your own next gen at any time, BUT you have to wait for a console's next gen, nefore you start to see TRUE next gen games taking advantage of the advancement in tech, as Watchdogs and StarWars CLEARLY fall into"nexf gen" games as suchionusX

I think the reason why The Last of us looked so good was not just the graphics itself. But the animation, the environments, and the small details that most other devs would have dropped, like the blood coming out of his nose as he is getting hit, the facial animation. The voice acting and audio also completes the package.

And if The Last of us was shown using a PC...it would have been too awesome to look at :-).

Martin_G_N

[QUOTE="ionusX"]

[QUOTE="mitu123"] I'm one of those people.=3

hardmicro

which is why 6 year old hardware plays codmw3 at 30fps at the same quality as the pc meanwhile a basic mahcine today can do almost the exact same task at much higher fps.

saying starwars 1313 will be ultra demanding and hardware taxing is like saying that doing grade 1 level math is hard for you.. then again i have a funny imagination about what you were like back in school..

hardmicronobody's answer to 2+2: thomas jeferrson sucka!

[QUOTE="Martin_G_N"]

I think the reason why The Last of us looked so good was not just the graphics itself. But the animation, the environments, and the small details that most other devs would have dropped, like the blood coming out of his nose as he is getting hit, the facial animation. The voice acting and audio also completes the package.

And if The Last of us was shown using a PC...it would have been too awesome to look at :-).

hardmicro

[QUOTE="hardmicro"][QUOTE="ionusX"] especially when you consider that starwars 1313 ran on UE3 the same engine used by UT3, R6V2 and singularity which are f--k OLD

ionusX

which is why 6 year old hardware plays codmw3 at 30fps at the same quality as the pc meanwhile a basic mahcine today can do almost the exact same task at much higher fps.

saying starwars 1313 will be ultra demanding and hardware taxing is like saying that doing grade 1 level math is hard for you.. then again i have a funny imagination about what you were like back in school..

hardmicronobody's answer to 2+2: thomas jeferrson sucka!

[QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]

[QUOTE="FashionFreak"]

C_Rule

Of course it does. You have to be on the drugs if you think otherwise.

[QUOTE="C_Rule"][QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]

Of course it does. You have to be on the drugs if you think otherwise.

Myounage

[QUOTE="C_Rule"][QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]

Of course it does. You have to be on the drugs if you think otherwise.

Myounage

[QUOTE="nameless12345"]Last of Us ran on a PS3 and it looked better than any multiplat.Jebus213

[QUOTE="hardmicro"][QUOTE="Martin_G_N"]

I think the reason why The Last of us looked so good was not just the graphics itself. But the animation, the environments, and the small details that most other devs would have dropped, like the blood coming out of his nose as he is getting hit, the facial animation. The voice acting and audio also completes the package.

And if The Last of us was shown using a PC...it would have been too awesome to look at :-).

ionusX

[QUOTE="hardmicro"][QUOTE="ionusX"] especially when you consider that starwars 1313 ran on UE3 the same engine used by UT3, R6V2 and singularity which are f--k OLD

ionusX

which is why 6 year old hardware plays codmw3 at 30fps at the same quality as the pc meanwhile a basic mahcine today can do almost the exact same task at much higher fps.

saying starwars 1313 will be ultra demanding and hardware taxing is like saying that doing grade 1 level math is hard for you.. then again i have a funny imagination about what you were like back in school..

hardmicronobody's answer to 2+2: thomas jeferrson sucka!

[QUOTE="ionusX"]

[QUOTE="hardmicro"] That doesn't mean anything. For example, The NEXT GENERATION Call of Duty games have been running ON A LAST GENERATION ENGINE lol. Your point is irrelevant ferret-gamer

which is why 6 year old hardware plays codmw3 at 30fps at the same quality as the pc meanwhile a basic mahcine today can do almost the exact same task at much higher fps.

saying starwars 1313 will be ultra demanding and hardware taxing is like saying that doing grade 1 level math is hard for you.. then again i have a funny imagination about what you were like back in school..

hardmicronobody's answer to 2+2: thomas jeferrson sucka!

If you talking about the video, well anything with a graphics card, if your talking about real time redering, well you'll need 3 gtx 580's to do that (roughly about the power of 30+ xbox 360's or PS3's).

If your asking what you need to run games at console capabilities, well anything from an Nividia 8800GT (released November 2006) onwards will do that

This(bullshot):

Does not beat this:

And there's more going on in the SW screen.=3

This(bullshot):

Does not beat this:

mitu123

Kinda hard for Uncharted to beat Uncharted. :P

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

This(bullshot):

Does not beat this:

ChubbyGuy40

Kinda hard for Uncharted to beat Uncharted. :P

stop stating the obvious, this is how it's always been. Why do you think Multiplats like Watch Dogs graphically shat on exclusives like last of us?jimmyrussle117